Young guns, or just young?

bingofuel
January 18 2008 12:41AM

young-guns.gif

The Edmonton Oilers are a young team, the third youngest in the league. But should the Oilers be considered a good young team?

Looking at the current youth movement in Edmonton, I'm not convinced. Sam Gagner has three goals—I know he's probably one of the best shootout performers in the league, but put five angry millionaires in front of the opponent’s net and the breathtaking moves start to look a lot more like dump-ins. He's only 18 years old and there's certainly room for growth. But take age out of the analysis; Gagner is responsible defensively, smart, great hockey sense and occasionally does something that makes you say “wow.”

I just described Toby Peterson.

Of the others in the group—Robert Nilsson, Andrew Cogliano, Kyle Brodziak, Dustin Penner, Denis Grebeshkov and Ladislav Smid—only Penner looks like a player who could be dominant one day. Don't forget Robbie Schremp, the one-time blue chipper couldn't crack the Oilers line up this year. Ouch.

Certainly all of these players have the potential to develop, but keep in mind every team that isn't winning now will tell you how much they love their young players, and whisper about growing pains and development. Take the Kings for example. They're in 30th place, but with Anze Kopitar, Mike Cammileri, Alexander Frolov, Patrick O'Sullivan, Dustin Brown, Jonathan Bernier and Jack Johnson as their young core, the Kings have a lot more to be excited about than the Oilers.

There are, however, reasons to smile if you're an Oilers fan:

  1. Ales Hemsky: ‘nuff said.
  2. Matthieu Garon: a team as prone to defensive lapses as the Oilers needs a gymnast in goal, and they have one.
  3. Dustin Penner: Started the year to a chorus of uh-ohs, Penner looked more like a white Laraque without the pugilistic resumé than a player worth a first-, second- and third-round draft pick. He deserves a lot of credit for turning it around in year one.
  4. Joni Pitkanen: Can't figure out whether he looks more like a giant baby or Finnish Frankenstein. Cheap shots aside this guy could be the next Scott Niedermayer.
243fa199ff6efc362bf29a17e950b47e
Bingofuel is the handsome cyborg who pulls all the levers behind the curtains of the OilersNation. When he isn't running the site, he's plugged into a wall socket, recharging. Or Brownlee and Wanye are playing "keep away" with him. He gets little to no respect.
Avatar
#1 Tony Danza
January 18 2008, 09:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

My fingers are fighting with each other about which point to discuss first!

1) Please explain to me how Pitkanen could be the next Scott Niedermayer. Pitkannen is an offensive defenseman with limited defensive or physical abilities. He is prone to injury, and has been traded for failing to show consistent effort.

Scott Niedermayer is a defensively sound offensive defenseman who is tough as nails. Anyone who questions the fact that Niedermayer brings consistent effort should look to the game on November 19, 2001. Niedermayer scored 3 goals, had 4 fights, 21 saves 12 penalty minutes and acted as usher in section 111 for most of the third period.

Pitkanen might be a good player, but he is no S.Niedermayer.

Also:

2) The Kings core is WAY crappier than that of the Oilers

3) Toby Peterson is a chump

4) Ladislav Smid is probably one of the most underrated young defenseman in the league. Patrick O'Sullivan? Isn't he the barternder at the Irish Pub Shenanigans.

I'll go get a broom

Avatar
#2 1011011
January 18 2008, 01:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think Tom Gilbert is an awesome young defenceman. The Oilers were right to trade Tommy Salo for him.

I also agree that Pitkannen is no Niedermayer. I cant understand why that Schremp doesnt deserves more of a chance. You never even hear about him anymore

Avatar
#3 time bomb
January 22 2008, 10:17AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Why is Schremp on that poster? He hasn't seen Rexall Place in months, except for during SportsCentre

Comments are closed for this article.