A Brief Point On NHLNumbers.com

Jonathan Willis
April 10 2009 05:45PM

Horcoff

With the Collective Bargaining Agreement negotiated between the NHL and the NHLPA to to end the 2004-05 lockout in effect, the NHL world turned upside down. Suddenly, the high-spending teams couldn’t just throw money at their problems; they were constrained by a salary cap. Every team needed to adapt; salary quickly became the chief consideration in any trade.

Journalists and fans needed to adapt too; in order to understand moves that general managers made, they needed to know the salaries of individual players.

Two different websites moved to provide that information – nhlnumbers.com and nhlscap.com. The latter website has since become affiliated with Eklund, so I generally prefer to use the first one – and I don’t seem to be alone. Unfortunately, some of the folks who make use of the site haven’t figured it out yet.

An excerpt from Tony Gallagher’s piece in the Vancouver Province today:

When you throw in what is now almost a laughably absurd $6.5 million cap hit for Shawn Horcoff over the next four seasons, you wonder how this team is going to be able to do much of anything next year unless they can unload some of these contracts.

Mark Spector also referenced that same 6.5MM cap hit in his column a week ago. The only trouble is that Shawn Horcoff’s contract actually pays him 33-million over six years.

Let’s do the math on that one quickly. 33MM/6years = 5.5MM/year. Why do people keep making this mistake?

The fault would seem to lie with the format of NHLNumbers. When clicking on the Oilers’ team information, this page appears. There, we can see that Horcoff earns 7MM, 6.5MM, 6.5MM, and 6MM over the first four years of his deal. That works out to an average cap hit of 6.5MM.

However, when we click the little arrow on the top right corner of the screen, this page appears. It shows that after those first four years, Shawn Horcoff will only earn 4.0MM and 3.0MM over the next two seasons. This brings the average cap hit down to 5.5MM per season, which is in agreement with the initial reports about Horcoff’s contract.

Why do I bring this up? Because I’ve seen the same mistake made repeatedly at this site, and it irks me. So if anyone here would like to quote contract numbers, please do us all a favour and just hit the little “expand” arrow. Well that, and it’s a good example of how even the mainstream media can mess up basic facts; despite the general professionalism and the education they have, they aren’t perfect either.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is Managing Editor of the Nation Network. He also currently writes for the Edmonton Journal's Cult of Hockey, Grantland, and Hockey Prospectus. His work has appeared at theScore, ESPN and Puck Daddy. He was previously founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue. Contact him at jonathan (dot) willis (at) live (dot) ca.
Avatar
#1 Mike
April 10 2009, 05:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I stand by my comments over at Lowetide's - nhlscap is run by IrishBlues, and he's a phenom with the salary cap.

Besides, see things like Robert Nilsson's contract for errors that nhlnumbers.com seems to never fix.

Avatar
#2 Mr P
April 10 2009, 06:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

JW - I see you have decided to use your man crush Pouliot as yor new photo. LOL

Avatar
#3 Jon K
April 10 2009, 07:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I prefer nhlscap as well, despite the association with hockeybuzz. My only complaint is that it has not been updated particularly well since the trade deadline.

Avatar
#4 Kyle S
April 10 2009, 09:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I believe nhlnumbers.com also has a column called "Ext" that lists the new cap number that takes effect next year for players who've signed extensions. It's the 2nd last column.

Horcoff is correctly stated as being 5.5.

Saves the trouble of doing the math.

Avatar
#5 MattL
April 11 2009, 08:02AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I might explode if I read another yahoo talking about Horcoff's 7mil/year contract. 5.5/yr is bad enough...

Avatar
#6 Cory
April 11 2009, 08:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ MattL: I'm with Matt Horcoff is still over paid by leaps and bounds!!!!!!!!

Avatar
#7 TonyT
April 11 2009, 10:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

If the Oilers liken Marty Reasoner to a poor man's "Joe Sakic", does that Shawn Horcoff a rich man's Marty Reasoner? Just checking.

Avatar
#8 nickxero
April 11 2009, 11:17AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Newspapermen need to learn how to use the internet? In THIS economy? How dare you!

Avatar
#9 Antony Ta
April 11 2009, 01:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

That's because Tony Gallagher and Mark Spector are computer illiterate.

Avatar
#10 The Towel Boy
April 11 2009, 03:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

All this discussion of Horcoff's salary is making me feel poor.

Comments are closed for this article.