100-point season for Nash doubtful

Jason Gregor
July 13 2009 08:18AM

To date 102 different players have totaled 100 or more points in an NHL season (to see the entire list, click here).

Phil Esposito was the first player to score 100 points in a season, when he scored twice in a 4-0 win over Pittsburgh on March 2, 1969. He went on to tally 126 points that year. Two others joined him later that year.

Bobby Hull set a new NHL record with 58 goals and finished with 107 points, while Gordie Howe recorded his first and only 100 point season at the young age of 41. He is still the oldest player to score 100 points in an NHL season. He did score 100 points in the WHA at 44 and 46 years of age.

Wayne Gretzky did it a whopping 15 times, 13 of them in consecutive seasons, and he is the only player to score 200 in a season, tallying 212, 205, 208 and 215. Mario Lemieux (10), Marcel Dionne (8), Mike Bossy (7) and Peter Stastny (7) round out the top five

Esposito, Dale Hawerchuk, Jari Kurri, Guy Lafleur, Mark Messier, Joe Sakic, Steve Yzerman and Bryan Trottier all did six times.

Only five defenceman have reached the century mark, Bobby Orr did it six times in six straight years. Paul Coffey had five 100-point seasons, while Denis Potvin, Al MacInnis and Brian Leetch did it once.

Many feel the ‘80s were the highest scoring era, but the 1992/1993 season had 21 players score 100 or more points.

In 1971 the Bruins had four players reach triple digits in points, Esposito (152), Orr (139), John Bucyk (116) and Ken Hodge had 105. The Oilers had four teammates on three different occasions and the Penguins did it once.

The last player to have three consecutive 100-point seasons was Jeremy Roenick when he scored 103, 107 and 107 in 1992 to 1994. Evgeni Malkin and Alex Ovechkin can match that this coming season if they stay healthy.

44 players did it once; meaning only 58 players in the history of the game have done it multiple times. Denis Maruk had 136 points in 1982, which turned out to be 39 more than he scored in any other season. He had the most points of any guy to do it only once. Vic Hadfield had one great year when he scored 50 goals and had 106 points in 1972, but his next best total was only 73 points.

In the 1978/1979 season Bob MacMillan had the season of his career scoring 108 points with the Atlanta Flames, he never had more than 63 in any other year. The 45-point differential is the largest amongst any player to score 100 points.

Brian Leetch and Joe Thornton had the fewest goals of any 100-point season, finding the twine 22 times. Only Gretzky (23), Adam Oates (23) and (25), Craig Janney (24) and Doug Weight are the others to tally 100 points with 25 or less goals.

I looked into the 100-point season when it was brought up that Rick Nash was being paid for his potential and that he’ll become a 100-point guy soon. Nash’s best total to date is 79 points, and his best junior season was 72 points in 54 games.

The list is lengthy of guys who put up 100 points in junior and never came close to repeating that in the NHL; Patrick Thoresen jumps out in that category.

But how many guys never scored 100 points in junior, but went on to reach the century mark in the NHL? Most of the Europeans haven’t because of the amount of games they played, but I was certain the list wouldn’t be that long amongst players who played major junior, or even in the USHL.

Yzerman had 91 points in Peterborough, before becoming a six-time 100-point guy in the NHL. Phil Esposito had 71 points in 49 games, his only year in the OHL. He also went on to become a six-time 100-point guy, and it was his 5th NHL season the first time he cracked 100 points.

Ron Francis had 48 points in 25 games for Sault Ste. Marie in 1982 before he got called up to Hartford, but he was easily on pace to notch 100 that year in the OHL. Al MacInnis had 84 points in 51 games in Kitchener before getting called up to Calgary during the 1983 season. Jeremy Roenick had 70 points in 28 games for Hull in the QMJHL in 1988/89, while also playing for Chicago that year.

Messier’s best year in the AJHL was 74 points in 54 games. He was never a huge point producer until he got to the NHL. He is a rare exception.

Brendan Shanahan potted 92 points with London, and he only had two 90+ point seasons in the NHL, with his best being 102 in 1994. Charlie Simmer had 99 points with the Greyhounds in the OHL, before rattling off back-to-back 100+ point seasons with the Kings. Eric Staal’s best junior campaign was 98 points before he scored 100 in his 2nd NHL season.

Mike Gartner recorded 90 points for Niagara Falls in the OHL, and he only ever had more than 90 points three times in the NHL, and just the one 102 point season in Washington. Marian Hossa had 85 points in 53 games for Portland in the WHL, and to date he’s only had one 100-point season.

Paul Maclean had 101 points with the Winnipeg Jets in 1985, but never had more than 79 any other year. His best junior year was 71 points in Hull. Strictly on a statistical basis he is the closest comparison to Nash. John Ogrodnick’s best major junior season saw him score 88 points, and he only had two 80+ points seasons in the NHL, with his best season being 1985 when he produced 105 points. Johnny Bucyk tallied 88 points in 70 games for the Edmonton Flyers in the WHL.

There are seven Hall of Famers, and two guys who might get in when they retire, Shanahan and Roenick that are comparables. Considering Nash hasn’t scored over 80 points in junior or the NHL so far, I think it is a stretch to assume he will become a 100-point player soon. It is possible since Maclean and Ogrodnick have done it, but Nash’s chances are slim.

Neal Broten, Craig Janney, Joe Juneau, Joe Mullen, Doug Weight, Adam Oates, Kevin Stevens and Brett Hull all played college and then went on to 100 point seasons. But only Stevens (2), Oates (4) and Hull (4) did it more than once.

Pavel Bure, Markus and Mats Naslund, Kent Nilsson, Daniel Alfredsson, Jari Kurri, Alex Mogilny, Temmu Selanne, Malkin, Ovechkin, Mats Sundin, Jaromir Jagr, Sergei Federov, Peter Stastny and Hakan Loob are the Europeans who tallied 100.

Vic Hadfield only had 48 games seasons when he played junior, Bobby Hull had 52, Jean Pronovost had 54, Darryl Sittler 54, but he did score 99 points one year and Bobby Orr had 56, although he had two 90+ point seasons in Oshawa. Gordie Howe had 48 points in 51 games for Omaha in the USHL. Due to their low GP totals I didn’t include them.

John Cullen played at Boston College, but he did score 157 points in his only IHL season in Flint. Paul Kariya had 100 points in 39 games for Maine in NCAA. Leetch had 101 points in 28 games for Cheshire in the high school league.

Dany Heatley had 70 goals and over 100 points in 1999 for the Calgary Canucks before playing college. Glenn Anderson scored 131 points in 64 games in the BCJHL for Bellingham. Peter Forsberg had 102 points in only 39 games for Modo Hockey Jr in the Swedish Junior league.

Nash’s career stats to this point don’t justify his new $7.8 million per season contract, and based on the past history of the game it doesn’t look promising that he will ever score 100 points.

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#1 Heatly
July 13 2009, 08:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Agreed!

Avatar
#2 Ogden Brother
July 13 2009, 08:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Looks like someone has an axe to grind with Nash (JK)

That said, I agree. Nash, though a very good player is one of the most overated guys in the league.

Avatar
#3 BigE57
July 13 2009, 08:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

We all know where paying guys for their potential can get us...isn't that right Mr. Penner?

Avatar
#4 LeatherCherrio
July 13 2009, 08:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I saw Riley Nash's picture after reading the title, and thought, "Yeah, that's pretty obvious". Don't think Rick will hit the century mark either.

Avatar
#5 Benjammin
July 13 2009, 08:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I'm assuming your talking about Rick Nash here. Why he picture of Riley Nash? Did Tambolini just give Riley Nash a 7.8 million dollar contract?!

Avatar
#6 OvenChicken8
July 13 2009, 08:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Nash isn't a good enough playmaker to bump his totals over 100pts. He will be a perennial 40 goal scorer but I bet he will never hit over 95pts in a season.

Avatar
#7 Harlie
July 13 2009, 09:02AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

looks like Nash got the old home town overpay. Klowe stylez.

Avatar
#8 DanMan
July 13 2009, 09:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Rick Nash has never been surrounded by enough talent, in the OHL or the NHL, to ever put up numbers he is capable of.

I think in a couple years when Brassard and Filatov blossom, Nash could potentially get 60 + goals and 40+ assists for 100 or more points.

Avatar
#9 Harlie
July 13 2009, 09:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

haha Nash's picture just mutated. Nice!

Avatar
#10 John K
July 13 2009, 09:09AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Overrated? I really doubt that. Watch Nash when he has a true high-skill centerman: he flat out can dominate games. Unfortunately this seems to only be possible when he's playing internationally for Canada.

He's never had a true #1 centerman in his entire career in the NHL.

Personally I would have been fine with the Oilers spending 7.8 on a guy like Nash.

Avatar
#11 DanMan
July 13 2009, 09:09AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The talent he has is ridiculous. With a true playmaking center, he could become a perennial 50-goal scorer.

Remember the goal against the 'Yotes?

Avatar
#12 Ogden Brother
July 13 2009, 09:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

John K wrote:

Overrated? I really doubt that. Watch Nash when he has a true high-skill centerman: he flat out can dominate games. Unfortunately this seems to only be possible when he’s playing internationally for Canada. He’s never had a true #1 centerman in his entire career in the NHL. Personally I would have been fine with the Oilers spending 7.8 on a guy like Nash.

Just the fact that he (supposedly) needs a top end line mate to dominate shows how overated he is. Check out AO's linemates his first year, or Malkins this year. Truely top end players don't need the help.

Avatar
#13 Wanye Gretz
July 13 2009, 09:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Personally I thought Bingofuel's Riley Nash joke was well played.

Avatar
#14 patty
July 13 2009, 09:25AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Wanye Gretz: I missed the bus on the Nash joke. Don't you guys think Riley could do it? He was a first rounder, you know.

My balls still hurt when I think about the slapshot that Thor took a couple years ago.

@ bingofuel: Any luck on the rss thing? Brownlee's article on Sakic was buggered for me. It's no problem on the weekends, as I enjoy ignoring my family. But at work, they get mad at me when I pretend they're not around.

Avatar
#15 scorecoff hemmercules
July 13 2009, 09:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The oilers are so boring this summer looks like even Gregor quit writing about them.

Avatar
#16 psycloud
July 13 2009, 09:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

You try getting 60 assists (assuming 40 goals) with Manny Malhotra as your center, and Kristian Huselius hitting the goal post every time he shoots.

As someone who watched the Jackets last season, Nash could have probably gotten 100 points last season if Juice had finished on a quarter of the goalposts he hit.

Avatar
#17 Ogden Brother
July 13 2009, 09:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Ever notice how guys that play with other top end players are only good because of their line mates while other guys that play with average players would be way better if it wasn't for their line mates?

Avatar
#18 myteammytown
July 13 2009, 10:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Ogden Brother wrote:

Ever notice how guys that play with other top end players are only good because of their line mates while other guys that play with average players would be way better if it wasn’t for their line mates?

common sense tells you to go **** your hat

Avatar
#19 Nick Dynasty
July 13 2009, 10:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Ray Ferraro used to always say on Sportsnet broadcasts that Hemmer was on the verge of a 100 point season. Think he'll ever do it?

Avatar
#20 Ogden Brother
July 13 2009, 10:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

myteammytown wrote:

Ogden Brother wrote: Ever notice how guys that play with other top end players are only good because of their line mates while other guys that play with average players would be way better if it wasn’t for their line mates? common sense tells you to go **** your hat

Done and done, suprisingly satisfying.

Avatar
#21 Jason Gregor
July 13 2009, 10:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

psycloud wrote:

You try getting 60 assists (assuming 40 goals) with Manny Malhotra as your center, and Kristian Huselius hitting the goal post every time he shoots. As someone who watched the Jackets last season, Nash could have probably gotten 100 points last season if Juice had finished on a quarter of the goalposts he hit.

I love these comments, "he could have scored 100 with other players". Go to a look at Yzerman and Sakic's career. Some years they had 50 or more points than the 2nd guy on their team. Great players make the players they play with better. And Nash didn't play a ton with Manny Malhotra. I like Nash as a player, but if he is going to be in the category of superstar, then he has to produce regardless of who he plays with.

Avatar
#22 myteammytown
July 13 2009, 10:17AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Ogden Brother:

i figured you would like that

Avatar
#23 Steve
July 13 2009, 10:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Off topic! Gregor my wife swears she saw you sing at Red Piano on Saturday! Is this true? Are you a singer? She said you were good.

Avatar
#24 Fridge
July 13 2009, 10:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Maybe top end players like Nash have to make there line mates better?

Avatar
#25 Jason Gregor
July 13 2009, 10:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Nick Dynasty wrote:

Ray Ferraro used to always say on Sportsnet broadcasts that Hemmer was on the verge of a 100 point season. Think he’ll ever do it?

Right now it looks like a long shot. He's never had an 80 point season either, and the Oilers PP is never good enough that he can get a few extra, easy bonus points here and there. Hemsky needs to take his game to the next level on a more consistent basis. He was unreal for that ten game stretch last year, but in order to have a 100 point season he'll have to play like that for close to 60 games.

Steve wrote:

Off topic! Gregor my wife swears she saw you sing at Red Piano on Saturday! Is this true? Are you a singer? She said you were good.

Unfortunately your wife is correct I did one song. I'm no singer. It was a bit of a challenge from the manager. But I'm no singer, and it won't be happening again anytime soon. She must have been a bit tipsy..ha

Avatar
#26 psycloud
July 13 2009, 10:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Jason Gregor: The first line center in Columbus was a bit of a revolving door situation, but he did play a good chunk of the second half of the season with Manny, after Brassard got injured and they moved Umberger to wing.

Anyway, I get your point, and no, he's not likely to be a 100 point scorer. He'll score you goals, but he's not a passer. He has a tendency to try to do too much on his own from time to time. I do think it's quite a bit harder to rack up assists on a team that doesn't have many finishers, though. Not much help from his center for about half the season, his other winger hit the post eleventy billion times over the course of the season, and there were absolutely no options on the back end (where Fedor Tyutin led them with nine goals).

It is worth noting that despite being a goal scorer, he led the team in assists.

I think the Gaborik deal may have hurt Howson in negotiations, because he's put up similar numbers over his career. In any case, if you're Scott Howson, you pay what you need to keep Rick Nash in Columbus. I agree that it was probably a bit of an overpayment, but he (at least for now, deservedly or not) is the franchise in that city.

Avatar
#27 Wanye Gretz
July 13 2009, 10:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Steve wrote:

Off topic! Gregor my wife swears she saw you sing at Red Piano on Saturday! Is this true? Are you a singer? She said you were good.

Good heavens. My ears bleed at the very thought.

Avatar
#28 ronaldo
July 13 2009, 11:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Is $7.8M an overpay? Sure. But what I don't understand is why oiler fans would think it is outrageous. It would take this level of salary to get this level of player to "choose" Edmonton. I'm sure Columbus is not at the top of players' lists either (it is warmer then Edmonton though), so you need to keep in mind $7.8M = player salary + location compromise.

Avatar
#29 bdubya
July 13 2009, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Not that this will ever be an NHL line but didn't nash put up a ridiculous amount of points playing with heatley and getzlaf at the world's? Maybe he does just need a set up man ala getzlaf. Can't be worse than umberger.

Avatar
#30 Jonathan Willis
July 13 2009, 11:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

On the other hand, Nash is hardly the only player in this category; the overpayment on his contract is pretty similar to the overpayment on Eric Staal's contract (8.2 million).

Sure, Staal has 1 100-point season, but he a) plays in the Southeast and b) is the only forward in the NHL to average less than 100 points per season over the past three years (76) while being paid more than 8-million dollars.

Avatar
#31 psycloud
July 13 2009, 11:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Jason Gregor wrote:

Go to a look at Yzerman and Sakic’s career. Some years they had 50 or more points than the 2nd guy on their team.

I did a little playing with the numbers, and, interestingly enough, Columbus had the third biggest margin in the league in terms of points scored by their leading point getter over their second leading point getter.

Shane Doan (PHX) had 27 more than the next guy. Pavel Datsyuk (DET) had 24 Rick Nash (CBJ) had 23 Alex Ovechkin had 22

And the league average was a difference of 9.4 points between the number one guy and the number two guy. Based on these numbers, Rick was getting the job done just fine. (Granted, you can obviously make numbers say whatever you want them to. If Malkin didn't have Crosby and still managed to put up 100 points, he'd have been 50 points better than the next guy.)

Avatar
#32 Jason Gregor
July 13 2009, 11:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Jonathan Willis:

The purpose wasn't to state Nash is a bad contract, but to focus on the possibility of him scoring 100 points in a season.

Staal's contract looks just as bad, but he at least took his team to the Cup, and is a force when they get in the playoffs. Nash has made the playoffs once, and hasn't won a round. I agree Staal hasn't produced nearly as well since his 100 point season, but he got paid on what he had done already, where as Nash hasn't done anything to merit his deal. Both are very good players, but they don't come close to Malkin, Crosby or Ovechkin and shouldn't be paid close to what those three get.

Avatar
#33 Jason Gregor
July 13 2009, 11:40AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

psycloud wrote:

And the league average was a difference of 9.4 points between the number one guy and the number two guy. Based on these numbers, Rick was getting the job done just fine. (Granted, you can obviously make numbers say whatever you want them to. If Malkin didn’t have Crosby and still managed to put up 100 points, he’d have been 50 points better than the next guy.)

He is clearly their best player, that is obvious, but he isn't close to being a 100 point guy...heck he hasn't even been an 80 point guy. Until Nash produces big numbers, regardless of his teammates, he shouldn't be in the elite category.

And while he did outscore his teammate by 23 this year, it was only eight points the year before that. In 2006 and 2007 he was 2nd on his team behind Vyborny, and in 2004 he was only four points ahead of Vyborny. So really only one year has he truly dominated his own teammates in scoring.

Avatar
#34 ScubaSteve
July 13 2009, 11:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Jason Gregor wrote:

I love these comments, “he could have scored 100 with other players”.

I agree, that he "could" get 100 with better linemates, but a player that does that, does not deserve this size of contract.

I also agree that Nash was paid a premium for being the face of the franchise. That being said, if Nash doesn't score at least 50/40 this year, the contract looks even worse. With this precedent set, what will be the asking price from Braussard, Filatov,or Mason?

Avatar
#35 Jack Bauer
July 13 2009, 11:56AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I think Iginla can be thrown into the category of Sakic and Yzerman as a guy who scored 100 points while playing on a garbage team.

I agree with the assessment that great players make other greater in reference to Hemsky. And while Hemsky is a good player, he is far from great. The fact that we "need to find that left winger that suits Hemsky" shows that in my opinion.

Avatar
#36 Tull
July 13 2009, 11:56AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

What a ridiculous article. Its a dump of research with a Rick Nash title.

Sure he's overpaid, but so is Horsecoff, Eric Staal, Paul Stastny, Brad Richards, Gomez, Drury, Gaborik, Briere, Nylander etc etc etc. The guy put up 79 points playing with centre RJ Umberger (who put up 46).

07-08: Nash puts up 69 points. Take your pick of centres who he played with - highest guy on the team was peca at 34 points...

06-07: Nash 57 points, played with a mix of centres, but the aging fedorov had the highest total of 42 points...

05-06: Nash 54 points, similar to 06-07, played some with Fedorov who put up 44 points. Key to this season was Nash was limited to 54 games.

This guy is a bonafide NHL star, no matter what kind of stats you can pile against him. He's a beast, and if the jackets can put together a half decent first line - he would be in the 100 range now.

You're a great spinster J.Gregor, I'm sure you can spin the numbers just as confidently to show Nash as a top player.

Avatar
#37 Jonathan Willis
July 13 2009, 12:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Jason Gregor wrote:

Both are very good players, but they don’t come close to Malkin, Crosby or Ovechkin and shouldn’t be paid close to what those three get.

Agreed.

Avatar
#38 Penner's 2nd Chin
July 13 2009, 12:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

It's absolutely hilarious that Gretzky was pacing 200+ while the 100-point plateau was/is still a fairly exclusive club.

Avatar
#39 MattN
July 13 2009, 12:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Cap Hits for LW in 10/11

1. AO - 9.538 2. Nash - 7.8 3. Heatley - 7.5 4. Gaborik - 7.5 5. Vanek - 7.143

That is about the order I would draft them in as well.

Avatar
#40 ronaldo
July 13 2009, 12:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

MattN wrote:

Cap Hits for LW in 10/11 1. AO - 9.538 2. Nash - 7.8 3. Heatley - 7.5 4. Gaborik - 7.5 5. Vanek - 7.143

Just imagine if Vanek's offer sheet was not matched: no Pennergate, no Nylandergate, no Hossagate, no Heatleygate. What would we have to talk about?

Avatar
#41 scorecoff hemmercules
July 13 2009, 01:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ ronaldo:

Wow, now that you mention it makes me wish we ended up with him. That cap hit is pretty serious though for a 65 point guy.

Avatar
#42 Ender the Dragon
July 13 2009, 01:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Tull wrote:

This guy is a bonafide NHL star. . . You’re a great spinster J.Gregor, I’m sure you can spin the numbers just as confidently to show Nash as a top player.

You seem very confident; can you?

Avatar
#43 jeanshorts
July 13 2009, 01:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

ronaldo wrote:

Just imagine if Vanek’s offer sheet was not matched: no Pennergate, no Nylandergate, no Hossagate, no Heatleygate. What would we have to talk about?

How much we are overpaying Vanek. Come on guy, we're Oiler fans. We'll always find something to complain about.

Avatar
#44 The Menace
July 13 2009, 01:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Tull wrote:

Sure he’s overpaid, but so is Horsecoff, Eric Staal, Paul Stastny, Brad Richards, Gomez, Drury, Gaborik, Briere, Nylander etc etc etc.
Why only the deprecating nickname to Horcoff? Here's a few to get you started: how abour Marion Gabnodick; Brad Prickchards; or Paul Spazny?
Avatar
#45 Jason Gregor
July 13 2009, 02:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Tull wrote:

You’re a great spinster J.Gregor, I’m sure you can spin the numbers just as confidently to show Nash as a top player.

Please do so. There is nothing that shows he is in the Elite category. Nothing. What does comparing his numbers to the other centres on his team prove by the way?

Avatar
#46 Hemmertime
July 13 2009, 02:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Jason Gregor:

We talk about Hemmers contract being a steal at 4.1 mil, lets say he is worth about... 5.5-6? I think that is fair, 6 mil would be a decent benchmark (Smytty makes more). Hemsky puts up slightly more points on average than Nash - but Nash doubles Hemmers goals. So in my opinion Nash is worth 6-7 per year at the high range - although personally I would have tried for one of those nice Detroit cap friendly contracts with similar money to Hossa. But the overpayment is only 1-1.5 mil cap hit, and that 1.5 mil is for the potential of him getting better.

We overpay Horcoff 1-1.5 mil. I would rather overpay a goal scorer who has a history of success on my team that extra amount, but 1-1.5 seems to be the "home team boost" for non-competitive teams.

Avatar
#47 Hemmertime
July 13 2009, 02:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

ronaldo wrote:

Just imagine if Vanek’s offer sheet was not matched: no Pennergate, no Nylandergate, no Hossagate, no Heatleygate. What would we have to talk about?

Oiler fans, we will talk about Stortinis training, how Khabibulins reaction time seems to have slipped 0.002 seconds on average (I bet Willis is watching video with a stopwatch right now), or about whether or not Theo Peckam has a legit shot at being our 6th-7th D man.

Hell, if Oilers.com is to be believed, we would even be interested in which players prefer Waffles to French toast, hot dogs to hamburgers and Aspen to Hawaii... I bet we could fill up at least 100 comments on that in the middle of an Edmonton August.

Avatar
#48 Jason Gregor
July 13 2009, 02:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Oilers just released their preseason schedule... Sept 15th @ Calgary. Sept 16th v. Islanders.

Sept 18th v. Florida Sept 19th @ Vancouver

Sept 20th @Islanders (game will be played in Saskatoon) Sept 23rd v. Calgary

Sept 24th @ Tampa Bay (game will be played in Winnipeg) Sept 27th v. Vancouver

Avatar
#49 Jason Gregor
July 13 2009, 02:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Hemmertime wrote:

We overpay Horcoff 1-1.5 mil. I would rather overpay a goal scorer who has a history of success on my team that extra amount, but 1-1.5 seems to be the “home team boost” for non-competitive teams.

It seems almost every teams pays more for certain players. The Rangers always gets UFAs and they always overpay for them. Gomez, Redden, Drury..etc...

It is hard to base exactly what Nash is worth, but for every overpayment a team has, they need to have a few "steal of a deal" contracts to make up for it.

I don't understand why guys get so defensive about Nash's value on here. The fact is he hasn't done anything to be paid as an Elite player, and based on the history of the game, and his stats, he will need to take his game to a level he has yet to achieve to become a 100 point player. He might, but the odds aren't in his favour based on what he has done to date.

I think if Nash was $6 million guy we'd think that was a fair contract.

Avatar
#50 Ed
July 13 2009, 02:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Jason Gregor wrote:

Oilers just released their preseason schedule… Sept 15th @ Calgary. Sept 16th v. Islanders. Sept 18th v. Florida Sept 19th @ Vancouver Sept 20th @Islanders (game will be played in Saskatoon) Sept 23rd v. Calgary Sept 24th @ Tampa Bay (game will be played in Winnipeg) Sept 27th v. Vancouver

Thanks...does that mean the season will start October 1st..I hope so...only 11 weeks until we see what Pat Quinn can do behind the bench.

Comments are closed for this article.