NHLNumbers Podcast Episode 3

NHLnumbers Podcast
November 30 2011 04:03PM

 

In the third installment of the NHLNumbers podcast, the regular cast including myself, JW and Justin Azevedo is joined by Robert Vollman, Flamesnation contributor and Hockey Prospectus author and one of the senior figures in quantitative hockey analysis. This episode features discussions of the psychological biases and habits that make objective analysis in hockey paradoxically counter-inuitive to the way we see and think about the game.

Segment 1

In the first segment, we talk to Rob about how he got his start in stats circles and some of measures he has created over the years.

Segment 2

In part two, we discuss the various ways statistical analysis clashes with the natural ways people encode and interpret information. Tendencies towards narrative creation and confirmation bias are mentioned. 

Segment 3

Finally we swing back to measures employd by Hockey Prospectus, including GVT (goals versus threshold) and Robert Vollman's own SNEPTS system that uses histroical comparables to project current players potential output.

Whole thing

Get the whole she-bang here.

94ba95fab8740ada4d871df564c355cd
A podcast aimed at investigating advanced stats in hockey.
Avatar
Reply #1 Stocc November 30 2011, 04:09PM
+1 13 props

Behold the mighty FIST of Stocc!

  .----.-----.-----.-----.
 /      \     \     \     \
|  \/    |     |   __L_____L__
|   |    |     |  (           \
|    \___/    /    \______/    |
|        \___/\___/\___/       |
 \      \     /               /
  |                        __/
   \_                   __/
    |        |         |
    |                  |
    |                  |

Avatar
Reply #2 Jerk Store November 30 2011, 04:20PM
+1 1 props

I have a hard time not fu .... er .... fouling paragraphs up. What is this wizardry you command?

Props for one of the few fists I have enjoyed (ya I said it).

Avatar
Reply #3 Archaeologuy November 30 2011, 04:45PM
+1 3 props

There are fists, and then there are FISTS. And that, my friend, was a FIST.

Avatar
Reply #4 Justin Azevedo November 30 2011, 04:48PM
+1 0 props

I'm a little disappointed I was not photoshopped onto penny's body. wrong? of course. but so, so right.

Avatar
Reply #5 Archaeologuy November 30 2011, 04:51PM
+1 0 props

Penny was the reason I hit the jump

Avatar
Reply #6 Tyler November 30 2011, 05:16PM
+1 0 props

LIkelihood aside, what you give up for Bobby Ryan? I've been dying to throw that one out there all day people? What say you?

Avatar
Reply #7 Stocc November 30 2011, 05:55PM
+1 0 props
Jerk Store wrote:

I have a hard time not fu .... er .... fouling paragraphs up. What is this wizardry you command?

Props for one of the few fists I have enjoyed (ya I said it).

I had to put my stuff between some <pre> and </pre> tags to get it to stay the way I wanted it. Learned it the hard way.

Avatar
Reply #8 Robin Brownlee November 30 2011, 05:59PM
+1 0 props

@Tyler

How about Hall, Nugent-Hopkins and Eberle, then. That's unlikely, no?

Avatar
Reply #9 Wanye November 30 2011, 07:17PM
+1 1 props

"This episode features discussions of the psychological biases and habits that make objective analysis in hockey paradoxically counter-inuitive to the way we see and think about the game."

Sometimes I wear my Eberle jersey to bed hoping when I wake up I will be him.

*drools*

Avatar
Reply #10 I tried it at home November 30 2011, 08:56PM
+1 0 props

I dont consider myself a slow person or dumb, really, but that 2nd sentence had my eyes glazed over half way through. I do actually understand what it means, ie we see and believe what we WANT to see and believe, but man, this is dry. *throws on a video of Ryan Jones bashing and crashing **drools happily

Avatar
Reply #11 Vintage Flame November 30 2011, 09:20PM
+1 0 props
Justin Azevedo wrote:

I'm a little disappointed I was not photoshopped onto penny's body. wrong? of course. but so, so right.

I had considered it Jazzy, but I thought you would be mad at me.

Avatar
Reply #12 Rob L December 01 2011, 08:13AM
+1 0 props

Good stuff. Keep it coming. Minor guess: we may hear about the Wild next week/in the future?

Avatar
Reply #13 Graham December 01 2011, 09:22AM
+1 0 props
Tyler wrote:

LIkelihood aside, what you give up for Bobby Ryan? I've been dying to throw that one out there all day people? What say you?

Assuming he is on the market, they are not looking to take much in the way of salaries back, so the Flames would likely have to offer a forward prospect, a defensive prospect and a high pick. Honestly, I think that would require Backlund, Brodie and at least a 2nd round pick... If you are Feaster you would have to think about it... Ryan is a commodity the Flames simply don't have, a true high end / blue chip younger forward.

Avatar
Reply #14 negrilcowboy December 01 2011, 10:03AM
+1 0 props
Graham wrote:

Assuming he is on the market, they are not looking to take much in the way of salaries back, so the Flames would likely have to offer a forward prospect, a defensive prospect and a high pick. Honestly, I think that would require Backlund, Brodie and at least a 2nd round pick... If you are Feaster you would have to think about it... Ryan is a commodity the Flames simply don't have, a true high end / blue chip younger forward.

borg,backlund and a first in 2013

Comments are closed for this article.