Spring Arrives in the Hinterland

Lowetide
March 20 2011 08:27AM

We're at the point in the draft cycle where hockey men use hyperbole to describe the future. Ken Hitchcock has Ryan Nugent-Hopkins as a cross between a young Joe Sakic and a young Pavel Datsyk; Sean Couturier`s last name should be 'Staal' according to the comparables; and Adam Larsson is better than Lidstrom at this age. Apparently.
 

What does it all mean? Hell if I know. As a fan, I like to look at the numbers and try to apply common sense to them. For instance, Adam Larsson is still a kid but is playing in a man's league. So, despite the impressive numbers of RNH and others, we need to pay special heed to what the big Swedish defender is doing now that the playoffs have arrived.

How is he doing? Well. His boxcars are 6gp, 0-2-2 -2 but as with all boxcars it's a black and white photo in dire need of color. Here's the back story on his playoff:

  • Game 1: 24:24 TOI even, 1 shot on goal and 2 hits in a win
  • Game 2: 23:19 TOI -1, 2 shots on goal and 1 hit in a loss
  • Game 3: 22:45 TOI even, 1 shot and 3 hits in another loss
  • Game 4: 24:37 TOI even, 2 shots in a win
  • Game 5: 21:47 TO! 1 assist, 3 shots on goal 2 pims and 3 hits in a win
  • Game 6: 22:14 TOI -1, 1 assist, 3 shots and 2 pims and 1 hit in a loss
  • Game 7: today

He's averaging 23:11TOI during the post-season after averaging 18:44 during the regular season. Here are the Skelleftea blue with their playoff time-on-ice per game:

  1. Adam Larsson 23:11
  2. Tim Erixon 22:11
  3. David Rundblad 20:20
  4. Fredrik Lindgren 20:04
  5. Niclas Burstrom 18:18
  6. Ivan Majesky 15:18

Based on their experience and skill sets, I'd suggest that Rundblad and either Erixon or Lindgren are getting the powerplay minutes, leaving Larsson to evens and PK. We talked about Larsson and his scouting reports here and we know that the Oilers have a laundry list of needs rolling out over the next several years.

As we get closer to the draft--and with the understanding that some of these CHL forwards are kicking out the jams and making big impressions--it is becoming increasingly difficult to argue against Jim Matheson's logic (stated most recently here). Last night, the Edmonton Oilers "hockey winter" reached a climax as the Avalanche drove the Oildrop further down the elevator shaft.

Spring arrives today, and with it the promise of renewal and growth. Staring at the numbers and sifting through the things our good friend math can tell us, Adam Larsson is extremely likely to be the best player available on draft day. Full stop.

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on TSN 1260.
Avatar
#1 book¡e
March 20 2011, 10:04AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

I think they should pick Hall, he is way better than Seguin.

Avatar
#2 Tha Legion
March 20 2011, 08:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

I don't understand why he's rated so high with so little offense but I still like the player.

Avatar
#3 Matt Henderson
March 20 2011, 03:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@Peterborough

Who says there's no 1C? It's not like Larsson is a lock as a 1D. Some have him toppin out as a 2nd pairing guy.

This "End Story" business is BS. There's no Crosby, that doesn't mean there isn't a 1C.

Drafting defensemen with lotto picks is a gamble. "End Story."

Avatar
#4 Kristopher
March 20 2011, 08:40AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@Meers22

and the first fail of the day is...

Avatar
#5 Tha Legion
March 20 2011, 09:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@Lowetide

Hmm, I trust Big Stu, just like last year because I wanted Seguin and after Hall's about 9th game I was happy.

Avatar
#6 The Farmer
March 20 2011, 12:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Just looking at the last few drafts, if they had a do over, do you think Erik Johnson goes as high, or Victor Hedman, the list goes on, I am not saying these players wont develop into superstars, but there is less of a chance. Erik Johnson has already been traded this early in his career. Why not let other organizations grow these elite D and then we can trade for them from our wealth of elite offensive talent when we know just how good the D is going to be.

Avatar
#7 Steve
March 20 2011, 05:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

So Larsson's team won game 7 by a score of 3-2, and are on to the next round of their playoffs. Larsson again had the greatest TOI on his team with 24:47, and he had 2 shots, 0 points, even +/-, and 2 PIM.

Avatar
#8 Peterborough
March 20 2011, 05:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@Matt Henderson

Drafting a centre who likely tops out as 2C with they #1 overall pick would be foolish. This is a weak draft for top end tallent to be sure. But this kid has been drooled over for a long time he has the intangibles that tell the true tale of a real 1D's worth. Plus we are in a position to bring him along not rush him in like Tampa did to Hedman. Someone's gonna love this kid and maybe there is a reason why Colorado lusts after him when they just picked up a young stud on D?

maybe he's the real deal or are they stupid in the mountains too?

Avatar
#10 @NateInVegas
March 20 2011, 09:25AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

The RNH campaigners will be out in full force the next few weeks..

It's too bad Edmonton can't afford to draft and develop this kid, he's gonna be a beauty..

If Tambi wasn't able to land Taylor&Tyler, or Brayden Schenn...

Don't expect the Oilers to magically land another top 10 pick..

This is a 6 year plan not a race for 8th.

Avatar
#11 DBO
March 20 2011, 09:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Build your team from the net out. Dubnyk looks like a solid option going forward. Add Larsson (who at 18 is playing the most minutes on his team in the playoffs. If that isn't a tell on how solid he is and the confidence his coach has in him. Not to mention that he eats up Even and PK minutes something we desperately need), a healthy Whitney and another solid vet and suddenly you have a decent defense. As you pointed out LT, Hall at centre makes a lot of sense, and it allows us to draft BPA with our 2nd 1st rd pick. Add Lander to that centre core, and you can move one of Cogs or Gagner to address other needs. The cupboard is pretty much full with prospects, so hopefully this summer we see some young potential pieces moved to solidify our NHL depth, and not our AHL depth.

I know they wouldn't be world beaters tight now, but if this is our defense going forward, I feel pretty good about our chances to compete.

Whitney-Larsson

Gilbert-Smid

Petry-Peckham

PP - Whitney-Larsson 1st pair. Gilbert-Petry 2nd pair PK - Whitney-Larsson 1st pair. Smid-Peckham 2nd pair.

Draft Larsson, add a vet or two up front, and let Dubnyk play 55 games and we will compete for a playoff spot.

Avatar
#12 michael
March 20 2011, 10:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

RNH. Full Stop. Stop the madness of suggesting we need to draft Adam Larsson.Stop the "I think we a number 1 defence" arguement. We need RNH. The arguement for drafting RNH. Nash. Has he ever had a number 1 center? No. Look at the numbers he puts up. What would they be if he had RNH or a Brad Richards giving him the puck? Hall and Eberle need a complimentary player. They need, not want, need a center who for the next 10 years will get them the puck and lead this team to playoff glory.Do we want to waste this opportunity this draft on a dman? We have been complaining for years about the lack of a number 1 center. Suddenly we fall in love with the idea that we need to get the "franchise dman". PIttsburgh, Detroit,and Chicago won thier CUPs because they were deep at center. Yes you need the dman who can play 23-25 minutes. But last I looked Whitney was capable of producing those kind of numbers. It would be a blunder to let this opportunity pass us by. The only way I see the Oilers drafting Larsson is if they plan on another 30th place finish next season. The almost 14 thousand who watched Friday nights Red Deer vs Oil Kings game got a taste of that future. I don't think any of them would say that RNH is not the player we should take this June. Hall and Eberle need a center. Tell me they don't.

Avatar
#13 John Chambers
March 20 2011, 10:12AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@madjam

I think you've made this comment before ... Like, every time you've ever posted.

Avatar
#15 speeds
March 20 2011, 12:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

LT:

I was just looking at Couturier's stats, and I knew he had a big lead in +/- on his team, but it's crazy how far ahead of his teammates he is.

F Couturier +54

F Palat +36

D Randazzo +20

D Mathieu +20

F Brunelle +17

D Blanchard +14

Those are the only players on his team with a +/- greater than +10.

Avatar
#17 godot10
March 20 2011, 01:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@gord962

//We have a plethora of young forward talent that will be ready in the next 3 years but if defenseman won't be 5 years then what is the point?//

Au contraire. Larsson will be ready to be an impact player just in time as one of Whitney (2 years) and Gilbert (3 years) will likely have to be let go for cap reasons.

A proper rebuild means rebuilding for permanent competitiveness, NOT rebuilding for a window or for a single shot at the Cup.

Avatar
#18 speeds
March 20 2011, 01:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Lowetide wrote:

speeds: excellent point. What do you make of his low shot total relative to his goals scored?

I don't know what to make of his shooting percentage, because I don't have a lot of people to compare it against as the OHL and WHL don't track it. I'd check it against his number last year, but for some reason last year's don't seem to be up on the Q site.

Is it normal for players to shoot at 16-20% in junior, and then drop to 12-13% as they move into leagues with better goaltending? I don't know.

But, for comparison:

Huberdeau - 42 goals on 195 shots = 21.5% Couturier - 36 goals on 221 shots = 16.3%

Avatar
#19 JaroslavPouzar
March 20 2011, 01:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

great post...

sign and trade for d-men... let someone else develop them over 3 years. Doughty is the exceptioon to top 5 D men taken in the top 5 over the last 5 years tyo make a stong impact... RNH is the guy we need. I saw him snipe a goal last night that only a future NHL stud can score. Take the governor off Hall and Eberle by giving them RNH...

Avatar
#20 Matt Henderson
March 20 2011, 01:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I would like to know more about Landeskog. His numbers alone dont scream #1 overall pick at all. He's not even close to the leading scorer on his own club. He's been injured and he's at about a 1.27 PPG, but compared to Strome's 1.63 PPG, RNH's 1.54 PPG, or Couturier's 1.67 PPG he's way off pace.

He must have some serious supporters to rank him #1. The math doesnt add up for me, so there has to be a lot more about the kid than his production.

I cant help but think GL #1 would be a mistake. I need some convincing that this guy is #1 material.

Avatar
#21 godot10
March 20 2011, 02:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F

Erik Johnson has had a major injury after he was drafted, that cost him a full season.

Major injuries affect development.

Avatar
#22 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
March 20 2011, 02:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
godot10 wrote:

Erik Johnson has had a major injury after he was drafted, that cost him a full season.

Major injuries affect development.

Ya I realize that, doesn't change the fact that all the evidence points to forwards being the far safer pick in the early first round.

Avatar
#23 Peterborough
March 20 2011, 05:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

exactly how long did lidstrome take? How long did Hedman take to lead his team in average time on ice? We need this guy and you can't trade for them. Gotta get them and hold on and not let go and just hope like crazy there isn't some horrible "incident" and his wife makes him leave town. :)

Avatar
#24 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
March 20 2011, 07:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Peterborough wrote:

exactly how long did lidstrome take? How long did Hedman take to lead his team in average time on ice? We need this guy and you can't trade for them. Gotta get them and hold on and not let go and just hope like crazy there isn't some horrible "incident" and his wife makes him leave town. :)

History actually tells us that you can trade for him.

Hell the Oilers themselves had trade for 4 guys since the lockout that are considerd 1st pairing guys (at least)

Avatar
#25 NamelessNed
March 20 2011, 08:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I'm in the same boat as most, not sure if using top pick for a dman is a great idea. I like the Larsson/Lidstrom comparison but the thing that bothers me is Lidstrom was drafted in the 3rd round, 53rd overall. Either way I have faith that Stu will make the right choice. Hope Steve and Kevin can make a few right choices in the off season to help this team

Avatar
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
ricky p wrote:

We always talk best logic on this site. We try to pick the best pick, to fill the big needs. What make the best sense for the Oilers? You can not count on Lowe and Dithers to make good moves the majority of the time. For every good move we have three bad moves that move us backward.

Unfortunately, the Oilers can not come out of their "hockey winter" with the Mr. Dither's and the President. As fans we drink the koolaid and believe we can not sign or trade for a center that is better than Horcoff or Gagne. Money talks and bulls*@*"t walks. We have money, sign someone that can play first line, until we grow something out of the stable. We get beat night after night because Horcoff gets beat night after night. He is now a third line center. Use him there.

We drink the koolaid and believe a quality defenceman will not sign or be acquired in a trade. That is crap too.

So if we want to draft Larsson, do it. Don't rush him and let him grow. In the mean time, go get a better center than Horcoff. Sign him for three years, until we are fighting for the playoff spots. If we don't, hello 30th place again next year.

You make no sense, Gagne is not a center and he doesn't play for the Oilers.

Avatar
#27 Brownlee loves the word meow
March 21 2011, 12:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

p.s.

meow

Avatar
#28 Meers22
March 20 2011, 08:33AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

And the fist pick in the draft is.... Adam Larsson!

Avatar
#30 ricky p
March 20 2011, 08:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

We always talk best logic on this site. We try to pick the best pick, to fill the big needs. What make the best sense for the Oilers? You can not count on Lowe and Dithers to make good moves the majority of the time. For every good move we have three bad moves that move us backward.

Unfortunately, the Oilers can not come out of their "hockey winter" with the Mr. Dither's and the President. As fans we drink the koolaid and believe we can not sign or trade for a center that is better than Horcoff or Gagne. Money talks and bulls*@*"t walks. We have money, sign someone that can play first line, until we grow something out of the stable. We get beat night after night because Horcoff gets beat night after night. He is now a third line center. Use him there.

We drink the koolaid and believe a quality defenceman will not sign or be acquired in a trade. That is crap too.

So if we want to draft Larsson, do it. Don't rush him and let him grow. In the mean time, go get a better center than Horcoff. Sign him for three years, until we are fighting for the playoff spots. If we don't, hello 30th place again next year.

Avatar
#31 Tha Legion
March 20 2011, 08:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Lowetide

So basically he wouldn't put up Alex Pietrangelo's offense in his prime? hmmm, I was a Couturier man, but now I'm leaning towards RNH, which suprises even me.

Avatar
#32 Meers22
March 20 2011, 08:54AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Kristopher

Until mid January when injures started to pile up the two greatest needs on the Oilers were the need for a top 2 defenseman, and a first line centre. Although, I do not believe, like some, that Tyler Piklick is the answer, I still think that Edmonton needs to go with a defenseman. Top defensemen are rare and hard to come by.

Avatar
#35 John Chambers
March 20 2011, 09:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

It might be interesting to see what other teams picking in the top 5 feel their needs are. For example, given that The Avs have Stastny and Duchesne as their top 2 C's, what interest do they have in the 'Nuge if we're poised to take Larsson.

I was hypothesizing scenarios where we would trade for The Av's pick, but we don't have anything they want outside guys we're not willing to trade.

But, if Stu is intent on drafting a C, perhaps we swap picks with the Avs and get them to include O'Reilly or their 1st in 2012.

Avatar
#36 madjam
March 20 2011, 10:10AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

JACKASS FIVE - The Oilers fifth sequel in the 1/2 decade old ring around the toilet bowl . Oiler cult fans lining up in droves for the next season of NHL hockey Oiler style ! The Spoof produced by Lowe and Directed extra ordinarily by Tambellini heads into it's fifth season of sellouts with a cult of fans whom can't wait for the next rendition of this classic series . Will Renney still be in charge of set direction ? Next years show may be an Oscar perfomance if they can pull off another year of sold out performances . Owner of studio of Katz Productions must be thrilled with the results his managerial and script people have made this series so popular . What new actors will be cast into next years show that will tantillate the fancy of previous spoofs ?

Avatar
#37 godot10
March 20 2011, 10:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

RNH gets a disproportionate share of his points on the PP. At even strength he is thoroughly mediocre. His goal scoring rate at even strength is poor for a so-called elite prospect. His assist production at even strength is ordinary for a so-called elite prospect.

Courturier, in particular, and Larsson( to a lesser degree) are suffering from the recency effect. New bright shiny things attract greater attention, and one begins to see the imperfections in things that have been around awhile.

I'm on Team Larsson. 20-25 minute per game defensemen that can play in ALL situations are rare and beautiful things.

Opportunities to snag a defenseman are much rarer than the opportunity to snag a centre. Centres are also much more available in the trade market.

Avatar
#38 @NateInVegas
March 20 2011, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

The Avs would be thrilled to get Landeskog or Larsson...

Avatar
#39 Shapeman
March 20 2011, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Hmmm now that I think about it I could almost see us not picking a defenseman becaus next year the top 5 is supposed to have 2 really good defenseman from the WHL in Griffin Reinhart and that other kid whose name escapes me...

Avatar
#40 DSG
March 20 2011, 10:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Larsson is the guy you pick if you go #1, #2 you pick Landeskog. They are the best players out there and you can't argue with the fact the Oilers need a stud defenceman. Is it a more pressing need than a centerman? I would say they are even but you are getting a shot at a stud defenceman not a superstar centerman so you take it. RNH is a couple of years away from being NHL ready and Couturier has a skill set that isn't matching with #1 center. Strome is going to be the best forward out of this draft in 5 years time.

Avatar
#42 DSG
March 20 2011, 10:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

On a totally different tangent... With the Barons in the lineup we actually looked more like a hockey team. Guys with size, that have varying puck skills (higher level of puck skil than JFJ, which isn't saying much) and can skate. What stuck out was the smaller guys flying around this ice without the puck... Reddox looked effective and Cogliano looked like his usual ineffective self. Fans are begging for this team to make some decisions and it is becoming more obvious each passing game... We need to cut bait on our smaller forwards to get to a manageable level... I think that leaves Eberle and Gagner on the team... That is about it...

Personally, I think Cogs is a terrible hockey player... Every time I watch him attempt to play hockey by skating real fast my opinion gets stronger... Seriously, I think there is a chance this guy will be out of the NHL in 3 years.... Will be an interesting summer for him.. His 1 year/1 million deal is up and I can't see a reason why the team would resign him to a contract that is any richer... I just hope he is playing somewhere else.

Avatar
#43 Dominoiler
March 20 2011, 10:54AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

i Dont understand the love for RNH.. Thank you Godot for reiterating the argument against RNH, without out even mentioning how slight he is.. that can change, but it will take years.. (that prob shouldnt be an issue, but in my opinion that does bring him down when compared to Larsson already being able to compete with men..)

BPA.. the Oil still have a few more years of drafting high to fill 'need'..

Avatar
#44 speeds
March 20 2011, 11:01AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I don't really get it LT. Maybe Larsson is the BPA, maybe he isn't, but I don't see how you get there from your article? His playoff ice time numbers are very impressive for a draft eligible player, but how does that on its own, full stop, make him the BPA when compared to others in the draft?

Avatar
#45 Ken
March 20 2011, 11:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

This team needs help right now.History shows defencemen take much longer than forwards to develop and some of the best defencemen come from the 2nd round. Of the top 10 projected 2011 draft players 5 are forwards and four of the forwards are centers.Three of the centers have over a 100pts and Couturier has 96 with one game remaining.If you look back at the last three drafts all the players with over 100pts are impact players. At the world junior the canadians ran at Larsson and he seemed to wilt.Unfortunatly RNH didnt get a chance to showcase his talent at the worlds but at the prospect game he outshone all the forwards.RNH is the answer for the Oil

Avatar
#46 Raine Snow
March 20 2011, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

It's hard not to like Nugent Hopkins. Another dominating game last night with 2 goals. He had some trouble holding the blue line on the powerplay and caused a couple turnovers, but overall the most complete player I've ever watched at his age. Both of his goals were displayed his raw skill, an absolute Joe Sakic like sniper in the top corner and his patient Datsyuk like deke for his 2nd. There aren't too many players, especially at his age, who plays such a dominating offensive game but is always defensively conscious. It's a rare combination and that is why he is being compared to the players he is.

I wish I could catch some games of Larsson, but geographically it hasn't been possible.

Avatar
#47 Matt Henderson
March 20 2011, 11:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Matheson didn't really lay out his reasoning behind why he thinks the Oil need a defenseman over a Centre. I, personally, can't think of any way the depth at C isn't worse than the depth at D.

The teams best prospects down the middle are Lander and Pitlick. Lander isn't projected to top out very high and Pitlick isn't even playing Centre, he's a RW.

Add to that sad depth chart the argument that you can't build a winner without depth at Centre and I'm sold that the Oil NEED a centre well before another defenseman. Of course if Stu says Larsson is the guy then he must have good reason, but the Oil desperately need one of those Centres to prove himself as the BPA.

The Oil could become the new Nashville and produce defenseman like they're on a Ford assembly line, but it won't win them games in the playoffs. No All-Star Centre, No Stanley Cup.

Avatar
#48 gongshow
March 20 2011, 11:45AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

LT - Any idea what sort of faceoff man RNH is? I can't find WHL faceoff stats anywhere. Also, RNH shows as +29 for this season. Again, I can't find team +/- for the Rebels, but doesn't this show that even if the majority of his points come on the PP, he's still a solid two-way contributor?

Avatar
#50 speeds
March 20 2011, 11:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

If you see Larsson as the BPA, why would you rather have Couturier?

Or do you mean that you think Larsson is the best player RIGHT NOW, while Couturier is a better bet to be better in the future?

Or, is it just a case of preferring the C to the D if they are pretty close in your mind?

Comments are closed for this article.