There’s No Easy Answer

Jonathan Willis
May 17 2011 08:20AM

 

After two seasons in the basement, I think it would be fair to say that most people – from fans to the media to the folks actually running the team – are ready to see some improvement from the Edmonton Oilers.

The Oilers biggest weakness over the last two seasons has been goaltending. Honestly, picking through the list of Oilers’ weaknesses over the past couple of seasons is a bit like shooting fish in a barrel, so I won’t bother – but even with all those problems, goaltending has stuck out like a sore thumb. Whether it was throwing the Deslauriers/Dubnyk tandem into the fire in 2009-10, or letting Dubnyk sit while Nikolai Khabibulin enjoyed the red light behind him, the Oilers haven’t had solid goaltending since Dwayne Roloson was let go.

There’s a simple, two-part solution to this particular problem: first dump Khabibulin, and second, sign Tomas Vokoun.

Before I get into the mechanics of making that move, I want to show the three year averages for Vokoun, Khabibulin and Dubnyk and then show the likely impact on the Oilers’ goals-against totals.

Three-Year Averages

Player EV SV% PK SV% PP SV%
Tomas Vokoun 0.931 0.889 0.931
Devan Dubnyk 0.914 0.87 1
Nikolai Khabibulin 0.919 0.841 0.927

Immediate Impact

The following table shows three scenarios, each modeled on the Oilers shots-against totals from last season. The first line shows what actually happened last season. The second line shows last season re-vamped using the three-year averages for Dubnyk and Khabibulin, and assuming that Khabibulin got Gerber’s starts. The third scenario uses the shots-against totals from last season, but this time assumes 60 games from Vokoun (his three-year average) and 22 from Dubnyk.

Scenario EV Shots EV SV% EV GA PK Shots PK SV% PK GA PP Shots PP SV% PP GA Total GA
Last Season 2021 0.914 174 495 0.851 74 71 0.972 2 250
Khabibulin/Dubnyk 2021 0.917 168 495 0.852 73 71 0.957 3 244
Vokoun/Dubnyk 2021 0.926 150 495 0.884 57 71 0.95 4 211

So, to summarize:

Last season was a bad one for Khabibulin, and if we assume he regresses to his average performance of the last three seasons, we can expect the Oilers to improve by six goals against – which is the equivalent of a single win. This would move them from 30th in the league to 30th in the league, barring other improvements.

If we plug in 60 games of Tomas Vokoun at his average performance for the last three seasons (behind a terrible Florida defense), we can expect the Oilers to improve by 39 goals – the equivalent of 6-1/2 wins. That would carry the Oilers from dead last to 26th in the NHL, all else being equal.

What’s Involved?

Buying out Nikolai Khabibulin wasn’t an option I’d given much thought to – until I read Scott Reynold’s opinion piece over at Copper & Blue last week. Essentially, the Oilers are still stuck with Khabibulin’s $3.75-million cap hit for the next two years (there’s no getting around the over-35 rule), but they could save themselves $2.5 million in actual dollars while – best of all – no longer having him on the team.

It probably wouldn’t take a lot of dough to sign Vokoun, either – the goalie is almost criminally underrated (fun comparison: in Khabibulin’s single good post-lockout season, the one that convinced the Oilers to sign him, he posted a 0.919 SV% - the same total as Vokoun’s worst post-lockout season). I’d be very surprised if a three-year, $12.0-million offer didn’t get a deal done – it’s less than Vokoun’s making now, but would still be one of the richest UFA goalie offers over the last few years. He’s also easily worth the money – his save percentage is off the charts year-in and year-out, no matter how bad the team he plays for is, and for those who argue he can’t get the job done when the games really matter, I’d point to his record at the World Championships, where he’s 23-4-1 with a 0.942 SV%, which is just slightly better than his work in the 2010 Olympics (3-2-0, 0.936 SV%).

Another fun point with Vokoun is his age – he turns 35 on July 2nd, but thanks to the way the NHL calculates age, he wouldn’t be signing a 35+ contract (the NHL calculates based on a player’s age on June 30 the summer before the contract takes effect).

Is It Worth It?

Yes. Vokoun’s a truly elite goaltender in a poor market, and he’ll be overshadowed by Ilya Bryzgalov and the bogus idea that he isn’t a championship-calibre goalie.

What about the fact that the Oilers are so bad that Vokoun wouldn’t have made a big difference this season? While an issue, the Oilers need to start winning some time, and I can’t think of a better way to knock 39 goals-against off the equation. Using the goaltending numbers from last season, the other way the Oilers could do it would be by preventing a little over 400 more shots.

Besides, the big flaw with assuming things will stay the way they are is that they don’t. The Oilers should be better at scoring goals next season – despite firing all the guys people hated and bringing in a new coach and a bunch of offensively-talented youngsters, they actually lost 20 goals from 2009-10, so there’s nowhere to go but up (though of course I said that last year, too).

The Oilers need to try and start winning eventually. This is a big first step.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is Managing Editor of the Nation Network. He also currently writes for the Edmonton Journal's Cult of Hockey, Grantland, and Hockey Prospectus. His work has appeared at theScore, ESPN and Puck Daddy. He was previously founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue. Contact him at jonathan (dot) willis (at) live (dot) ca.
Avatar
#51 Ca$h-Money
May 17 2011, 12:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Not buying it Obbie.....

What people are saying is that the goalteding is a mess and needs adjusting *along with* some depth brought in on the backend and down the middle.

Give Nikolia those same benifits as you mentioned and he's as good as Vokoun would be. Put Vokoun on last yrs Oiler team and he surely would've sucked as well.

I really don't know how someone who is convinced that 2 second line centers are the problem, but doesn't take issue with a starter having one of the worst SV%'s in the league.

I'm gambling here. Just rather take my chances that having the opportunity to grab a second center in that top five group this summer will end up being better than what's going the other direction. We've got enough "support" or projected third line players, just want to cash in on some of those for that second shot at someone who could be a top 6 player.

So Vokoun on last yrs. Oilers team would've been just as bad as Khabibulin?

By that logic, Dubnyk on the Florida Panthers would have been the hands down favourite to win the Vezina, and Gerber would be collecting 15million dollar/season offers from every team in the league as a UFA.

Avatar
#52 Quicksilver ballet
May 17 2011, 12:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Ca$h-Money wrote:

So Vokoun on last yrs. Oilers team would've been just as bad as Khabibulin?

By that logic, Dubnyk on the Florida Panthers would have been the hands down favourite to win the Vezina, and Gerber would be collecting 15million dollar/season offers from every team in the league as a UFA.

If those irrelevant numbers tell the truth then by all means sign your Martin Gerber to a 15 million dollar deal. Who gives a rats arse about Dubnyk then...

The kid played 25 nothing games on the lousiest team in the league and finsihed with a sub .500 record. Tell me how this impresses you in anyway shape or form?

Avatar
#53 Archaeologuy
May 17 2011, 12:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Quicksilver ballet

Save Percentage is not an irrelevant number. That is Universally agreed upon by everyone except you, I guess.

Avatar
#55 Quicksilver ballet
May 17 2011, 01:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Jonathan Willis wrote:

@ Quicksilver:

Judging goalies by win totals is incredibly misguided.

That's the kind of thinking that gets Andrew Raycroft on the cover of The Hockey News.

Not sure he had much choice in the matter JW, usually happens to Calder trophy winners, doesn't it?.

Avatar
#56 SurfacetoAirMissile
May 17 2011, 01:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Voukoun.... no thanks. Instead take one of the training wheels off of Duby and give him a shove. (40ish games) If he makes to the end of the block with only falling off and skinning his knee a couple of times then by next year he can take the other training wheel off and be the man.

Avatar
#57 K
May 17 2011, 01:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

We need a 108 goal differential increase to make the playoffs. I excpect 30 more from the kids. If goaltending can get us 39 we need about 39 more. How much can we realistically expect a 3c (Belanger) and a top d would get us?

Avatar
#58 spOILer
May 17 2011, 01:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

1. I don't think we have any confirmation from anywhere that there are any nominal savings to buying out NK. The formula might well be that you pay him what you signed him for and his full cap hit counts. He might as well be on the roster somewhere.

2. There are other teams possibly looking for vet #1 goalies and there aren't many quality choices available: COL, PHA, PHO, WAS, FLA themselves. He's likely going to want to play for a contender or not move. And it is utterly daft to think he's under-rated by NHL professionals.

3. FLA paid a tremendous price to Nashville for Vokoun based on an identical philosphy to the one expressed in the OP above--that stellar netminding will shave off GA and add wins. Where has it gotten them?

4. I'm not convinced the analysis in the OP is correct. Do we have any evidence that we can move goalies and their SPs will remain the same? Maybe we do, I honestly don't know. But since we're talking about alleviating goals against, and since that is a team stat and since the rest of the team is essentially the same, can we expect goals against per game to change that much?

Avatar
#60 Tapdog
May 17 2011, 01:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Ender wrote:

As long as we're talking about goaltending, I'm going to bring up the subject of Gerber. What are we doing with him?

I recognize that his 100% win record and his .958 PCT in the Show this year is completely unsustainable. I know that long-term, he's not starting-goalie material for the Oilers. Nonetheless, he's a great option for OKC and he's proven that he can come up when he's needed and do a respectable job.

The guy is a UFA. Should we not be throwing some dollars at Gerber to bring him back for another couple years? He's pulling better numbers than JDD (who is also a UFA) and he's only 35; the man has some hockey left to play. I'm thinking it might as well be for us.

Gerber feels that he could have a shot at a backup position in the NHL and a one way deal. I am sure if that closes up he will entertain the thought of being back in OKC.

They were talking about this a few weeks back on Oilers Lunch!

Avatar
#61 Ender
May 17 2011, 01:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
SurfacetoAirMissile wrote:

Voukoun.... no thanks. Instead take one of the training wheels off of Duby and give him a shove. (40ish games) If he makes to the end of the block with only falling off and skinning his knee a couple of times then by next year he can take the other training wheel off and be the man.

You know, this past season everyone was shouting awfully loud for Dubnyk to be the starter or at the very least get equal playing time and be the 1A/1B. Was that only because we were going to lose anyway so it didn't matter? Now that we're in danger of winning a few games this coming season, DD isn't good enough to stand in our net anymore?

I like the idea of Vokoun or another well-established top goalie in our net as well as anyone. The thing is, though, if Dubnyk is supposed to be the goalie of the future for this team, he does need to be passed the reins at some point. Otherwise, we're just developing a career backup. Is that what we're doing here? Growing someone to tend twine when the starter is sick or tired?

I like the idea of winning as much as the next guy. Opinion is split as to whether we have the team to make the playoffs in 11-12. I'd like to see it and some of these young guys give me reason to think we can do it, but I honestly didn't see 30th-place in the cards last summer either. The point is . . . if we're destined to finish 10 or 11 in the conference next season anyway, having Dubnyk start 50-60 games might not be the worst thing in the world. If he struggles, he still hasn't cost you much and you can get ready to jettison him and find your real goalie for 12-13 when expectations will definitely be playoffs or better. If he suprises and carries you to the playoffs this season, then you know he's for real and all your rookies have some faith in him going into a season that matters.

Forget the whale-hunt. Put DD in net and have a couple of veterans behind him (Khabi/Gerber) to keep us from being a complete freak-show if he falters. We had a very long wait trying to separate the wheat from the chaff between DD and JDD. Assuming that process had any kind of merit and we now have the wheat, it's time to put it to the test.

Avatar
#62 Ender
May 17 2011, 01:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

[double-post]

Avatar
#63 dawgbone
May 17 2011, 02:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

If those irrelevant numbers tell the truth then by all means sign your Martin Gerber to a 15 million dollar deal. Who gives a rats arse about Dubnyk then...

The kid played 25 nothing games on the lousiest team in the league and finsihed with a sub .500 record. Tell me how this impresses you in anyway shape or form?

How many goals do you expect Dubnyk to score?

Wins just aren't based on the goaltender. It would be nice if goalies could save the games that they give up 4 goals for when their team scores 5 and saves the shutouts for when their team scores just 1 but that's not how it works.

Avatar
#64 Jordan
May 17 2011, 03:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The solution to all problems Khabbibulin is as follows: 1 – Trade him to any really cash-strapped team for a draft pick/prospect/bad contract we don’t care about that fills a hole (whatever we can get or they don’t want) 2 – That team makes a deal with some KHL Squad for him to “retire” and play in Russia for the duration of the contract. He doesn’t show up, said NHL team doesn’t pay him, but keep the salary cap, so they dont need to spend as much to reach the floor 3 – The Oilers send him a care package of Rexall Suppliments and good vodka so there’s no hard feelings 4 - Sign Vokoun

Avatar
#65 Dog Train
May 17 2011, 04:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The title says it all, there is no easy answer. The goaltending certainly needs to be better going forward but we could end up back at square one by signing another aging goaltender. One of Dubnyk, Roy or Bunz should hopefully become a number 1 guy in time so I wouldn't be in favour of paying a goaltender who isn't on our roster anymore and another one over 35. Is there any way that Khabi's legal issues force our hand? Unfortunately, given how management and coaching has praised the Bulin Wall, I doubt that we will see a different NHL goaltending tandem for the Oil next season.

Avatar
#66 Ca$h-Money!
May 17 2011, 05:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

If those irrelevant numbers tell the truth then by all means sign your Martin Gerber to a 15 million dollar deal. Who gives a rats arse about Dubnyk then...

The kid played 25 nothing games on the lousiest team in the league and finsihed with a sub .500 record. Tell me how this impresses you in anyway shape or form?

You miraculously fail to understand the simple logic in my post.

1) YOU are saying that Khabibulin is at least as good as Vokoun based on the fact that Khabibulin, while his numbers were worse, played on a worse team.

2) IF WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, then by the same logic, Dubnyk and Gerber must be SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER than Vokoun because they were substantially better than Khabibulin while playing on the same team. Sure, Gerber only played 3 games, so get rid of him. Dubnyk played a similar amount of games to Khabibulin, so the comparison is valid.

Logic wins every time there big guy.

Avatar
#67 Quicksilver ballet
May 17 2011, 05:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Ca$h-Money! wrote:

You miraculously fail to understand the simple logic in my post.

1) YOU are saying that Khabibulin is at least as good as Vokoun based on the fact that Khabibulin, while his numbers were worse, played on a worse team.

2) IF WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, then by the same logic, Dubnyk and Gerber must be SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER than Vokoun because they were substantially better than Khabibulin while playing on the same team. Sure, Gerber only played 3 games, so get rid of him. Dubnyk played a similar amount of games to Khabibulin, so the comparison is valid.

Logic wins every time there big guy.

Most of these numbers you guys are referring to just symbols of success, used by those who are yet to prove themselves. It's a little simpler for me, Khabibulin can play and Dubnyk is yet to show he can carry the load. This is why we seen 35 start 2/3rds of the games last yr, Renney started the goalie whom he felt gave his team the best chance to win.

Logic in numbers and logic in on ice abilities are two different things. Khabibulin returns to form and Dubnyk plays yet fewer games next season.

Avatar
#68 Ender
May 17 2011, 05:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Dog Train wrote:

Is there any way that Khabi's legal issues force our hand?

Long story short, no. That ship has sailed; if the Oilers were going to do something in that vein, they'd have done it long since. If that possibility ever existed, they're stuck with him now.

Avatar
#69 robinrussia
May 17 2011, 07:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I think the final decision will come down to actual money. Tambi can't afford to park Souray and Khabi's contracts in the AHL or buy both them out. That's the kind of money that would get a GM Fired! Along with Nilssons salary.

I know Katz has deep pockets, but even billionaires don't like to throw that much money away.

Khabi will be here next year unless he's 1) in Jail and 2) can't get entry into Canada due to a criminal record. IMO, the 2nd scenario is preferable, as he would be in breach of his contract and he could be suspended with out pay nor counting against the cap.

Avatar
#70 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
May 17 2011, 07:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

The only numbers that matter are the wins, both were sub .500 in that category. Lets not put this dog poo on the table and try to analyze whats in it.

Dubnyk showed me something with 10 days to go in the season. He went up against the Calgary Flames with a chance to put a nail in their coffin and blew it bigtime. A 4-1 lead 5 minutes into the third and he gassed it. It's really strange that this is the only loss i remember from all of last year. As bad as Khabby played all yr the only one i remember is this HNIC Dubnyk loss.

Quite possibly the most bizzar person I've ever come accross.

Avatar
#71 Team Hall
May 17 2011, 08:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

This isn't even a debate. The Oilers are going into next year with a tandem of Khabby and Doobie, they've already said as much. Its not even the worst tandem in the league, so we have bigger fish to fry. Now, about signing a UFA defenseman who can defend...and a guy who can win a faceoff...

Avatar
#72 Crash
May 17 2011, 11:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Team Hall wrote:

This isn't even a debate. The Oilers are going into next year with a tandem of Khabby and Doobie, they've already said as much. Its not even the worst tandem in the league, so we have bigger fish to fry. Now, about signing a UFA defenseman who can defend...and a guy who can win a faceoff...

I'm with you Team Hall and somewhat agree with QS...forget about the goaltending, hand DD the starters job or at least split the games. The last thing the Oilers need to worry about is the goaltending tandem...it's fine the way it is.

I agree with those that say there's no point in adding some other starting vet netminder and pushing DD further back...he's starting to come, so let that trend continue, give him more games. It would be nice to add a top 3/4 d-man if possible, some toughness in the bottom six and most of all stay healthy for a change.

Avatar
#73 striker777
May 18 2011, 02:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I am against buying out anybody this season. There is simply no point. If we sign Vokoun, then only for 1 year (overpay him), while Khabibulin is in the minors, then trade Vocoun at the trade deadline to a contender for their 1st round pick. Bring back Bulin to finish the season. I project us finishing between 10-12th place next season. Then we have 2 first-round picks and don't have to buy out Bulin.

Avatar
#74 dawgbone
May 18 2011, 08:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Most of these numbers you guys are referring to just symbols of success, used by those who are yet to prove themselves. It's a little simpler for me, Khabibulin can play and Dubnyk is yet to show he can carry the load. This is why we seen 35 start 2/3rds of the games last yr, Renney started the goalie whom he felt gave his team the best chance to win.

Logic in numbers and logic in on ice abilities are two different things. Khabibulin returns to form and Dubnyk plays yet fewer games next season.

Khabi returns to what form?

He's statistically the worst goaltender in the NHL since the lockout (amongst goalies who have played all 6 years).

He's also injury prone and getting older. What form do you expect him to revert to?

And I don't think Renney thought Khabibulin gave them the best chance to win. It was more along the lines of trying to salvage this disaster of a contract.

Avatar
#75 dawgbone
May 18 2011, 08:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Crash wrote:

I'm with you Team Hall and somewhat agree with QS...forget about the goaltending, hand DD the starters job or at least split the games. The last thing the Oilers need to worry about is the goaltending tandem...it's fine the way it is.

I agree with those that say there's no point in adding some other starting vet netminder and pushing DD further back...he's starting to come, so let that trend continue, give him more games. It would be nice to add a top 3/4 d-man if possible, some toughness in the bottom six and most of all stay healthy for a change.

Who is a worse tandem?

The only worse tandem I can think of is the Islanders post-Roloson, and that's just based on name recognition, not actual play.

Avatar
#76 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
May 18 2011, 08:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Crash wrote:

I'm with you Team Hall and somewhat agree with QS...forget about the goaltending, hand DD the starters job or at least split the games. The last thing the Oilers need to worry about is the goaltending tandem...it's fine the way it is.

I agree with those that say there's no point in adding some other starting vet netminder and pushing DD further back...he's starting to come, so let that trend continue, give him more games. It would be nice to add a top 3/4 d-man if possible, some toughness in the bottom six and most of all stay healthy for a change.

Thier is no rational, resonable way you can argue a tamdem is "fine the way it is" when one guy is putting up some of the worst numbers in the league.

Avatar
#77 Team Couturier
May 18 2011, 08:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Well, that Anderson/Budaj tandem was pretty bad, as was the Philly merry go round. Just two examples. Besides, when you have one good goalie and one poor one, that can't be the worst tandem, remember the Conkanen project?

Avatar
#78 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
May 18 2011, 08:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Team Couturier wrote:

Well, that Anderson/Budaj tandem was pretty bad, as was the Philly merry go round. Just two examples. Besides, when you have one good goalie and one poor one, that can't be the worst tandem, remember the Conkanen project?

Flyers goaltending actually had really solid regular season numbers, it was just a PO meltdown.

You're right, Colorado's was probably equally as bad (finished 2nd last oddly enough) but I bet you wont find a bunch of Colorado fans saying the goaltending was fine the was it is.

Avatar
#79 Henry
May 18 2011, 09:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Why would Vokoun want to go to Edmonton instead of say Denver?

Avatar
#80 JB
May 18 2011, 09:25AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Henry wrote:

Why would Vokoun want to go to Edmonton instead of say Denver?

$$$$ and term one would think.

Avatar
#81 VMR
May 18 2011, 09:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Ender wrote:

Dog Train wrote:

Is there any way that Khabi's legal issues force our hand?

Long story short, no. That ship has sailed; if the Oilers were going to do something in that vein, they'd have done it long since. If that possibility ever existed, they're stuck with him now.

Dont think there ever was anything they could do. He never missed a day of work so it's not like they could suspend him for not reporting.

We all seem to recognize how bad Khabi has been but I'm not sure the team does. Renney continued to throw him out there, the media seemed to not notice his bad rebounds and the soft goals he gave up instead focusing on his occasional highlight reel saves. I'd be really surprised if we see any change this offseason because to bring someone else in we'd have to ditch Khabi and I cant see Tambo doing it.

Avatar
#82 Quicksilver ballet
May 18 2011, 10:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Believe it or not i think Khabibulin will land himself another contract after this one's concluded, can even see it happening here.

If Tambellini can convert that 19th into a top 6 selection, everything changes. He'll surround those kids with a few vets and compete for a playoff spot this year. Khabby's a better goaltender if the puck is in the other end for half the game instead of it being in the Oilers end for three quarters of it.

Avatar
#83 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
May 18 2011, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Believe it or not i think Khabibulin will land himself another contract after this one's concluded, can even see it happening here.

If Tambellini can convert that 19th into a top 6 selection, everything changes. He'll surround those kids with a few vets and compete for a playoff spot this year. Khabby's a better goaltender if the puck is in the other end for half the game instead of it being in the Oilers end for three quarters of it.

Nothing changes if your "starter" stops 89% of the shots he faces.

Avatar
#84 Ned Braden
May 18 2011, 11:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Vokun's last two years save % (.922 and .925) and GAA (2.55 and 2.55)

Rehabby last two years PRIOR to new contract with Oilers, save % (.919 and .909) and GAA (2.33 and 2.63).

Oh also Vokun's injury report from the last 12 months 2011/04/06 Missed 3 games (back spasms). 2011/03/29 Back spasms, day-to-day. 2011/01/25 Missed 1 game (undisclosed). 2011/01/23 Undisclosed, day-to-day. 2010/04/11 Missed the last 2 games of the regular season (back injury). 2010/04/08 Back injury, day-to-day.

Definition of insanity : doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...

Avatar
#85 speeds
May 18 2011, 12:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Ned Braden wrote:

Vokun's last two years save % (.922 and .925) and GAA (2.55 and 2.55)

Rehabby last two years PRIOR to new contract with Oilers, save % (.919 and .909) and GAA (2.33 and 2.63).

Oh also Vokun's injury report from the last 12 months 2011/04/06 Missed 3 games (back spasms). 2011/03/29 Back spasms, day-to-day. 2011/01/25 Missed 1 game (undisclosed). 2011/01/23 Undisclosed, day-to-day. 2010/04/11 Missed the last 2 games of the regular season (back injury). 2010/04/08 Back injury, day-to-day.

Definition of insanity : doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...

You haven't answered how Khabibulin and Vokoun are similar, outside of age. And you have selective chosen endpoints to appear to strengthen your argument - feel free to note the seasons prior that, where Khabibulin had seasons of .902 in 06/7 and 0.886 in 05/6 and Vokoun had seasons of 0.919 in 07/8 and 0.926 in 08/9, or the past 2 years where Khabibulin has a combined sub 0.900 sv% which is relevant in deciding whether it makes sense to consider replacing Khabi.

There are reasonably arguments against signing Vokoun to an overpay, short team deal (I'm for the idea of signing Vokoun to such a deal, but as always it depends what other options are avaialble), but one of them isn't "he's kinda the same age at the time of the prospective signing as was Khabibulin".

Avatar
#86 Quicksilver ballet
May 18 2011, 01:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F wrote:

Nothing changes if your "starter" stops 89% of the shots he faces.

Those were last years facts. Adding a blueliner(s) to go with maybe Smyth and Hartnell, this is a different hockey club.

I'd still try and work a miracle and turn that 19th into a second shot in that top 6.

Avatar
#87 Ned Braden
May 18 2011, 02:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ speeds

I am fine with replacing Habby, his time here has been an unmitigated disaster. I was not trying to defend him or justify his signing. But why replace him with another 35 year old goalie, who is only going to sign on with a team to be a starting goalie?

This team is in rebuild mode. Why not allow Dubynk to be the starter. Let him play 55-60 games and see how he handles it. I would much prefer that to signing of another goalie.

Avatar
#88 speeds
May 18 2011, 02:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Ned Braden wrote:

@ speeds

I am fine with replacing Habby, his time here has been an unmitigated disaster. I was not trying to defend him or justify his signing. But why replace him with another 35 year old goalie, who is only going to sign on with a team to be a starting goalie?

This team is in rebuild mode. Why not allow Dubynk to be the starter. Let him play 55-60 games and see how he handles it. I would much prefer that to signing of another goalie.

I am fine with the second paragraph if that's what the team decides to do. If they've decided internally that they will give Dubnyk 60+ games UNLESS Khabibulin stands on his head and forces them to give him more games, I can't say that's a crazy idea for a rebuilding club, especially if the money you would have spent on Vokoun could then be applied to add a quality F, or D, or two.

Comments are closed for this article.