Sudden Sam

Lowetide
July 19 2011 10:33AM

In the decade that began in 1997-98, no Oiler rookie approached the heights reached by Sudden Sam Gagner. Samwise. The young magician posted a big number as a teenager, and has been chasing it ever since. Is Gagner ever going to get better?

By any measure (except for the ones David Staples uses) Sam Gagner is getting better, making progess. Let's begin with the easy stuff, the boxcars:

  • Age 18 79, 13-36-49 (.620 points per game)
  • Age 19 76, 16-25-41 (.539 points per game)
  • Age 20 68, 15-26-41 (.603 points per game)
  • Age 21 68, 15-27-42 (.618 points per game)

You call that progress? Yes, yes I do. Gagner has never played on a good hockey team at the NHL level. Team wins by season were 41, 35, 27 and 25. Team GF totals per season were 235, 234, 214 and 193. So, using the brain God gave us Gagner was in on 20.8% of the offense as a rookie and 21.8% of the offense this past season.

Sam Gagner might appear to be running in place, but he is now the best offensive option at center for the Edmonton Oilers. His 5x5 points-per-60 numbers are heading in a good direction too:

  • 07-08 5x5 per 60m: 1.96
  • 08-09 5x5 per 60m: 1.69
  • 09-10 5x5 per 60m: 1.56
  • 10-11 5x5 per 60m: 1.91

RUN....IT'S MATH!!!!!

My Dad always had a saying that worked during arguments with my Mom. It went something like "if you have to work this hard to prove you're right then you're probably wrong." Not a strong argument, but it drove my Mom crazy and that was the end game (Mom and Dad were happily married btw, couples niggle away at each other. Some of us enjoy it!).

Gabriel Desjardins supplies us with a steady stream of information from year to year at behind the net. If he charged a dollar for every visit he'd own my house. I promise this won't hurt a bit, we're going to look at two measurements here that are easily explained:

CORSI REL

Let's first define Corsi:a stat for all the shots directed for and against while a player is on the ice at even strength. Includes shots, missed shots and blocked shots.

Now Corsi Rel: A players corsi rating versus the rest of his team. Calculated by subtracting the team's collective corsi rating while he's off the ice from his on-ice corsi rating. Can be used to calculate the relative corsi rating of his opponents for quality of competition purposes.

Both definitions and a very nice guide here.

  • 07-08: 0.6 (7th among Oiler F's)
  • 08-09: 6.0 (6th among Oiler F's)
  • 09-10: 10.9 (second among Oiler F's)
  • 10-11: 7.0 (tied for 4th among Oilers F's)

As you can see, Gagner has consistently been among the top 6 F's by this discipline, including last season when he played with the two rookies after Christmas. These CorsiRel numbers are very good, from beginning to end.

ZONE START/END

This measures a lot of things, not the least of which is how much does the coach trust you? During the MacT years with that young 07-09 team Shawn Horcoff didn't see many offensive zone faceoffs (as an example). Pat Quinn and Tom Renney have been less likely to play the percentages but there's still a lot to be learned from the stat. Progress would be a larger positive gap between end and start.

  • 07-08: 52.8/53.9 (+1.1)
  • 08-09: 55.4/49.7 (-5.7)
  • 09-10: 48.8/49.8 (+1.0)
  • 10-11: 50.9/53.4 (+2.5)

Overall a very positive number, with one season off the rails (Horcoff was off by 4 points this past season, as an example). The good thing about this is that the 10-11 number was posted when he was playing with two rookies (Omark and Paajarvi) and shoud bode well for the future.

There are some negatives in the Sam Gagner resume. His PP number was poor this past season, but so was Hemsky's and that guy is a ridiculous PP talent. I'm more inclined to blame the coaching/setup for the failure of the PP (same with PK by the way). His faceoff percentages are poor, and if he's going to have a career at center improvement needs to be made in the discipline.

However, with summer at its peak (it actually happened Sunday. Did you miss it?) I think it's time to put it out there: Sam Gagner is the best offensive option at center for the 11-12 Edmonton Oilers. All of Gagner, RNH, Horcoff and Belanger should post solid crooked numbers, but Gagner's age, resume and skill set suggest that it's a good bet he'll grade out as the best available centerman in offensive situations this coming season.

Should Nugent-Hopkins surpass him, it would represent an outstanding debut. Should 89 lose offensive playing time (at EVs and PP) to Horcoff and Belanger, we should consider it a major blow to Gagner's status as a top flight young player ready to emerge as a difference maker.

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on Team 1260.
Avatar
#151 WeepForTheSin
July 19 2011, 05:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
TigerUnderGlass wrote:

Please explain his Qualcomp rating? He spent an entire season comfortably 3rd among centers on his team.

Manny Malhotra

If Kesler wasn't shutting down the opposition in the playoffs, then he has no excuse for his lack of offensive production in round 1, at the very least.

I also must have been watching different games.

Avatar
#152 OilFan
July 19 2011, 06:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Gagner is a average NHL player not a great 2nd line center but not bad either. Do most Gagner fans drink the Kool-Aid ? But but he's only 21 !!! Sam's a smart hockey player but slow as hell, his shot isn't great and brutal at the dot, a defensive liability. I see Gagner playing the wing in the future just not in a Oiler jersey.

Avatar
#153 OilFan
July 19 2011, 06:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Walter Sobchak

Won't it help the rebuild by getting a defense man ? "Had for less" What would Gagner's trade value be ?

So how is Sam going to play easier mins ? Shouldn't that be for the kids with only a season behind them not four ?

Avatar
#154 They're $hittie
July 19 2011, 06:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

What about is +/- and GA over 60 minute numbers. If the puck is going in the right direction, how come those numbers are so low?

Gagner has put up okay numbers on a 30th place team, but when the team gets better talent like RNH, do you think he will still get the same opportunities to produce those numbers? He has to take a big step forward this year, or his window of opportunity will be much smaller, at least in Edmonton.

I believe Gilbert was terrible in his stats too. And he is paid a lot more than Gagner. And has a larger stature to that everyone complains about gagner for. so what is gilberts excuse. He is a few years older too.

Watch replays of the games last year. The oilers got scored on lots and he was on the ice for most of them.

Avatar
#155 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
July 19 2011, 07:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@ Dman09. Looks like Kessler played easier competition in th playoffs as well.

Avatar
#156 OilFan
July 19 2011, 07:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

40 point players are easy to trade for

Avatar
#157 Walter Sobchak
July 19 2011, 07:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Kodiak

All good points, I ignore most stats as well, and I cant argue about foot speed or that he plays on the perimeter or that age is a factor, your correct on all of that.

That being said I don't believe he got the proper development from the Oilers, he hasn't had the trainers or development camps as the others have and the Oilers were so desperate to get him in and play him, he's been through three head coach's,I don't want to use the locker room as an excuse for Gagner but his veteran leadership with exception to Horcoff sucked big time. I think the adjustment period really just started.

I think he should get another year before blowing him off. If he has the same issues you mentioned then we know he wont get better. IMO

Avatar
#158 oscar
July 19 2011, 07:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I love the “he's only 21” line. I wish young age would work as an excuse in the real world “But I've only been working here for four years, cut me some slack!”

Avatar
#159 Kodiak
July 19 2011, 07:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Walter Sobchak

I agree his development was handled very poorly and the team situation as a whole has not been a good one for a young kid. I don't buy that he hasn't had the opportunity to work with our skating coaches regularly and playing a few seasons the kid had to recognize his lack of physical strength. He's got enough money to hire a personal trainer if improving that aspect of his game was important to him.

I don't see his game fitting this team. I can't name one successful team that has a smaller, one dimensional top six center. I think Gagner has a chance to put up better numbers but I can't see him being able to handle the playoff style of game with his skating and size.

I think the Oilers are trying to put together a Boys on the Bus, young, growing up together, maturing together, close knit team and if Gagner doesn't fit a role going forward, move him now for a young Dman that has a chance to be a part of it from the relative ground floor. Winning this season isn't a priority. Trading Sam would hurt us this year, but acquiring a Bogosian type player that is young and has the potential to be something special and a core part of the team in the future would make it worth it.

Avatar
#160 Wax Man Riley
July 19 2011, 07:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

So the question is are the Oilers going to wait for him to break out? If he breaks out at all?

Is he professional enough to continue to train harder than anyone else to make himself into the player he was in junior?

Can that translate to the 'chel?

What is success for Sudden Sam? 60pts a year? #2 cebter? Less than 50 players in the NHL scored 60 or more points last year. Kovalchuk scored 60. Doan scored 60. Ladd scored 59, is he a #2C failure?

Edit: Ok, much more than A question.

Avatar
#161 Wax Man Riley
July 19 2011, 07:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Kodiak

So, by "Bogosian-type player", do you mean Bogosian? As I hear, that will not happen. Plus, would you trade Bogo for Sam? I'm not sure I do that deal. They already have Bryan Little at 5'11" 185lbs "under-performing" with 48pts

Avatar
#162 Kodiak
July 19 2011, 08:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Wax Man Riley wrote:

So, by "Bogosian-type player", do you mean Bogosian? As I hear, that will not happen. Plus, would you trade Bogo for Sam? I'm not sure I do that deal. They already have Bryan Little at 5'11" 185lbs "under-performing" with 48pts

Bogosian is an option. I would do that deal but I understand Winnepeg not. It's just a matter of getting a deal done and obviously potential top pairing D men are tough to acquire. If other GM's were as optimistic about Gagner's future as some on here they should be approaching us.

Avatar
#163 Archaeologuy
July 19 2011, 08:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@spOILer

I didnt think the website was that bad. The iPad App was insanely slow, but they just had an update that made it usable. Either way I havent paid a dime to read the content, so its hard for me to complain.

Avatar
#164 Jimbones
July 19 2011, 08:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I have to agree with LT on this one. Good organizations do not give up on propsects with the pedigree of Sam.

This kid was a 6th overall pick for a reason. Be patient and the cream will rise to the top.

This kid has talent and as he gains experience and the team improves he is going to show it.

Avatar
#165 spOILer
July 19 2011, 09:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Arch,

I know, but, but, but....

lol

For me The Sunms recent change was awful too. I much preferred it before. If I'm on a print site, it is for a reason. The best ones have blurbs or hover over blurbs, load quick, are easy to navigate, restrict animated ads, scale, are word heavy, good writers, great content, don't parrot the corporate view, don't waste clicks. Print is quick, efficient. Video and Audio painfully slow.

Journal scores about a half on writing and another half on content. Problem is, it's a difficult site to be selective about what one reads because of the way it's set up... no blurbs, no authors up front, no dates... it's all about clicking through... And then hitting the muthafrickin Back button. There are so many other better free news sites out there that the saving of the dime becomes very quickly irrelevant.

Avatar
#166 justDOit
July 19 2011, 10:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jimbones wrote:

I have to agree with LT on this one. Good organizations do not give up on propsects with the pedigree of Sam.

This kid was a 6th overall pick for a reason. Be patient and the cream will rise to the top.

This kid has talent and as he gains experience and the team improves he is going to show it.

First off, I agree JB - I'm more than willing to be patient with Gagner, and I chalk more than a little bit of his troubles up to being on such a bad team. Not just 'sorta' bad, but stinking, rotten, G-D AWFUL kinda bad.

And then there's the year or two that he should have spent in the AHL. The only problem with that was, at the time, the Oilers had just declared an affiliation with Springfield, and before had only shared a farm team. Maybe the reasoning behind putting Gagner on the big team was the farm team was in a bit of disarray, and they wanted more control over Gagner's development. A lot of this team's problems can be traced to their apparent lack of appreciation for how the farm is run and managed. Tambi has certainly turned that around.

But not every 6th OA pick turns out, and that's what the detractors are saying - he will be the next coming of Rico Fata (6th overall by the Flambe's in 1998). To me, Cogliano is more of a Fata, because they both share the curse of more speed than their eyes and hands can handle. Gags shows more game, all around, than that.

And Omark was drafted in Sam's year - 97th overall. Now those are the picks that really help build a team!

Avatar
#167 belly
July 19 2011, 10:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@They're $hittie

If that is intended for me well... I was not trying to be sarcastic in my post. - If you are indeed stating Eberle could be a centermen in the future (since he was amazing in Vegina, Saskatchewan) I agree. If there could be a true 2 way center on the oilers in the future Eberle (if given a shot) is already a year deep and should be given a shot to do so. Noticed how I said 2 way, and not second line. It is all about business. Think about it like a poker game. If we have Eberle playing center and showing up the Oilers 4-year veteran (that we have signed for over 2 mil) how will they ever be able to trade that person to another team? Every team will low-ball you, and the Oilers would not get anything in return. There are special circumstances though.... The Oilers would like to get the best return on investment possible, and right now it has not been about winning hockey games.

Avatar
#168 DSF
July 19 2011, 11:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Just spent a couple of hours chewing the fat with the former GM of the Kitchener Rangers who also was Director of Player Development with Hockey Canada.

Scathing in his assessment of Gagner's sense of entitlement.

Avatar
#169 Wanyes bastard child
July 19 2011, 11:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@DSF

And my girlfriends sister is besties with your ex's and word through the grapevine is you have a small pencil*

*edited for ON's sake

Disclaimer.. sources or it ain't true, just like the guy spouting off a few threads back that he new "reliably" that Hemsky and his girl want out.

Avatar
#170 Kodiak
July 19 2011, 11:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Woodguy wrote:

Here's another fun exercise.

Take some of your favorite centers and look at their 21 year old year.

Here's some:

Jeff Carter 62gp 14g 23a 37pts -17

Hendrick Sedin 82gp 16g 20a 36pts +8

Saku Koivu 82 gp 20g 25a 45pts -7

Patrick Sharp 3gp 0g 0a 0pts

Mike Richards 59gp 10g 22a 32pts -12

Ryan Kessler 82gp 10g 13a 23pts +1

David Krejci 56gp 6g 21a 27pts -3

Sam Gagner 68gp 15g 27a 42pts -17

There are plenty more.

Everyone who expects Gagner to be like those guys today forget how long it takes for NHL players to develop.

Last year we should have been seeing Gagner's 1st or 2nd NHL season. Because the Oiler management have been developmental basketcases up until last year it didn't happen.

Don't hate Sam for it. He's tracking ahead of a lot guys you would love to have on the Oilers.

Jeff Carter: 82GP 46g 38a 84pts +23

Henrik Sedin: 76gp 11g 31a 42pts +23

Saku Koivu: 65gp 14g 30a 44pts -7

Patrick Sharp: 50gp 9g 14a 23pts +1

Mike Richards: 79gp 30g 50a 80pts +22

Ryan Kesler: 82gp 26g 33a 59pts +8

David Krejci: 82gp 22g 51a 73pts +37 (3rd season)

Martin St.Louis: 82gp 33g 37a 70pts +10

Joe Pavelski: 80gp 25g 34a 59pts +5 (3rd season)

Travis Zajac: 82gp 20g 42a 62pts +33 (3rd season)

Paul Stastny: 82gp 28g 50a 78pts +4 (as a 21 yr old, drafted 44th overall the year before Sam)

Sam Gagner: 68gp 15g 27a 42pts -17

Here's another fun exercise, let's compare these players in their fourth NHL season (or prior) when growing pains and age shouldn't be used as an excuse. Age is an excuse because of lack of experience. If you've played 4 years in the league you should have figured out what it's all about by then and what you need to bring to the table.

Avatar
#171 Shaun Doe
July 19 2011, 11:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Kodiak

That's a fine looking Dorado my friend. Did you go fishing in Bolivia?

Avatar
#172 Kodiak
July 20 2011, 12:03AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Shaun Doe

Sure did. Was there this spring. By far the best trip I've done!

Avatar
#173 knobby
July 20 2011, 01:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
David S wrote:
After 4 yrs. I would have guessed he'd be more of a contributor by now. He linemates Cogliano and Nilsson are both gone as failed projects. You have to think he may be next if he can't address his weaknesses and show improvement.

Would that be the same "Cogliano" that just got a juicy three-year deal slotting him in the top nine of a pretty decent NHL ice hockey team?

"Failed Projects" FAIL.

Lombardi's over-payment is not proof of Cogliano's competency....Dude

Avatar
#174 Archaeologuy
July 20 2011, 06:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@knobby

Lombardi?

Avatar
#175 They're $hittie
July 20 2011, 08:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@belly

no that is not a shot at you. I am just stating that no one thinks eberle is underperforming and he is not much younger and the stats are relatively the same. There have been articles that have shown the difference in eberles play with and without hall. needless to say he is better with hall. Also he was much more protected with his linemates and icetime (other than penalty killing) than gagner every was. And again eberle was older in his debut and not playing center. regardless of the chemistry in the short time, gagners numbers would be better ir he played with hall all year/

Also i think eberle will be a great all around player but why is everyone so keen on his defensive game. he go a few beuaty shorty goals last year but did you see how bad our pk was with him and horcoff on. didnt get better until they were taken off.

Starting at Jrs, Eberle has had the same amount of development time as gagner, they have just have had different paths, and i think it is wrong to crucify gagner because he was on a crappy team and expected to carry an offensive load with the teams best winger consistantly hurt all while trying to maintain his defensive game under three different systems.

Avatar
#176 Walter Sobchak
July 20 2011, 09:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@@Oilanderp

ya, thanks for not sharing your crap with us.

Avatar
#177 Darrenski
July 20 2011, 09:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I believe Gagner is lacking very much in terms of strength and grit. Both of these traits would help him win draws and be better defensively, which is where he is falling short to be a center in the NHL. Even though he is a "skill" guy he needs to be able to win battles and be stronger on the puck. Not to often he goes into a corner and comes out with the puck. I don't get it, the Oil have stronger centers coming up in the system, and they are not 21. Gagner + whatever it takes(a pick or two) should be traded for a top 2 D. I bet ST does this before the deadline. I hope.

Avatar
#178 @Oilanderp
July 20 2011, 09:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Walter Sobchak wrote:

ya, thanks for not sharing your crap with us.

Not getting along with your mother today Wes?

Avatar
#179 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
July 20 2011, 09:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Darrenski wrote:

I believe Gagner is lacking very much in terms of strength and grit. Both of these traits would help him win draws and be better defensively, which is where he is falling short to be a center in the NHL. Even though he is a "skill" guy he needs to be able to win battles and be stronger on the puck. Not to often he goes into a corner and comes out with the puck. I don't get it, the Oil have stronger centers coming up in the system, and they are not 21. Gagner + whatever it takes(a pick or two) should be traded for a top 2 D. I bet ST does this before the deadline. I hope.

Here's the catch though, outside of RNH we likely don't have stronger centers coming up in the system.

Avatar
#180 @Oilanderp
July 20 2011, 10:17AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Nice work Mr. Frog, I guess I am Group B.

Avatar
#181 Kodiak
July 20 2011, 12:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Archaeologuy wrote:

It's not as if these guys werent playing elite organized hockey before they were 21 either. They were also gaining valuable experience playing in the CHL, AHL, and European leagues during those years. The difference is that Gagner was good enough to play in the NHL during those same years.

The argument that Gagner has 4 years experience therefore he should be breaking out is warped. The guys trotted out as breaking out after 4 years in the NHL also had 2 to 3 more YEARS of development time.

It takes TIME and reps to get better. The difference here is that Gagner's time and reps have been taking place in the NHL vs the developmental leagues. It's not like Kesler/Sedin/Krejci/Whomever were sitting stagnant until they made the NHL and THEN the development started. We're talking about several YEARS extra to work on parts of their game with considerably less pressure to deliver.

Years in NHL vs Years Developing shouldnt even be an argument, yet here we are.

So you are saying a 21 year old rookie won't have to make any adjustments in his game, will be used to the speed of the NHL game, understands the physical requirements of the game, and that the CHL and AHL provided him with the best competition to hone his game so a 21 year old rookie is on the exact same learning curve as a 21 year old 4 year veteran? Really? Seriously?

Avatar
#182 Kodiak
July 20 2011, 03:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Archaeologuy wrote:

No, I'm saying a 21 year old rookie will have had 3-4 more years of development time to work on aspects of his game before entering the league with lower expectations than a 21 year old 4 year NHL vet.

Really. Seriously.

Look at Eberle's numbers and look at Gagner's numbers. Do you feel the same about them? Because they produced roughly the same, except Eberle did it playing with better players.

If there are no advantages to playing 4 years in the NHL as opposed to playing in Jr and the AHL, why would there be increased expectations? Just admit a 4 year NHL veteran should be farther along in his development than someone playing Jr/AHL hockey even if they are the same age.

By your thought process, all players are supposed to improve at the same rate at the same age, regardless of experience and I don't buy that.

Enough with the Gagner was stuck with rookies and therefore has an excuse BS. He played half the season with Hemsky, some with Hall and some with Penner. Eberle played with another rookie and Horcoff, who you suggest isn't the offensive dynamo Gagner is. I see why you want to compare Eberle and Gagner to prove your point, Eberle is already a better player on both sides of the puck. It must be all his extra time in Jr. , right?

Avatar
#183 SuntanOil
July 20 2011, 04:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Wanyes bastard child

Far be it from me to ever defend DSF, still it takes little effort to put two and two together to know who he is referring to. If you need to know, this link should give a final clue: http://www.hockeycanada.ca/index.php/ci_id/10124/la_id/1.htm

It's a credible enough name, yet hearing that an amateur hockey official feels an NHL player has a sense of entitlement is not really surprising. What is more curious is to why Gagne's name came up at all.

Avatar
#184 Kodiak
July 20 2011, 04:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Archaeologuy wrote:

I'm comparing them because they put up almost equal numbers but one is a star on the rise and the other has plateaued and wont amount to anything (according to you). Jordan Eberle is not heads and tails better than Gagner defensively, you just think that because you have much lower expectations for him than you do for Gagner.

I never said there werent advantages to playing in the NHL, but what advantages there are for developing your game in the NHL dont make up for extra years to work on deficiencies with little to no pressure.

By my thought process players do NOT improve at the same rate, but they do keep improving past the age of 21 no matter how many years they played in the NHL.

By YOUR thought process all players should develop equally based on years in the league, completely ignoring the total amount of development post draft or physical maturity. It's completely unrealistic.

Where have I ever said Gagner won't amount to anything? Please enlighten me as to when I ever suggested that? There's a difference between suggesting he doesn't fit a role here and saying he won't amount to anything? (you aren't his Mom are you?)

I'm not counting on Eberle being a star but I do think he has a higher ceiling than Gagner because of his more rounded skillset and yes, I feel Gagner has plateaued. Nice touch on telling me why I feel the way I do, you are starting to sound like my wife.

I've never suggested Gagner won't improve either but I don't think its realistic to expect big improvements in his skating and physical abilities after 4 primetime improvement years in the NHL have gone by with marginal improvements to date. And yes, I feel he needs to improve his game a lot for him to be a second line center on a Cup contending team.

Can you name one center on a cup contending team that has Gagner's skillset and style of play? Do you think beyond his maybe 50ish points that he will ever improve enough to be as solid defensively as Kesler, be as effective on faceoffs as Bergeron, be able to kill penalties efficiently, or strong enough to handle the tough, grinding playoff games? I don't and I also don't see one dimensional 2nd line centers on successful teams.

Avatar
#185 Kodiak
July 20 2011, 05:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
TigerUnderGlass wrote:
Enough with the Gagner was stuck with rookies and therefore has an excuse BS. He played half the season with Hemsky, some with Hall and some with Penner.

You did see the splits Lowetide posted showing Gagners numbers early in the season, when he played with the guys you just mentioned, and his numbers after teaming up with Omark and Paajarvi didn't you?

You're right though, he did play with those guys, and he was having a very good season until he had to go and try to float 2 rookies by himself.

Gagner got primetime PP minutes and didn't do a whole lot with it so it looks like maybe it was a case of the rookies not being able to carry him 5x5 like Hemsky and Penner did moreso than him not being able to carry the rookies.

Avatar
#186 Oilcan
July 20 2011, 05:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I like Gagner and I think he can improve (This is his make or break year 5 seasons in he should have it figured out) but at the same time I dont think the argument should be is Gagner a good player (He clearly is) but is he the right fit for the Oilers? And that is where I have my doubts, but if RNH shows he is the number one center and we are stuck with Horcoff (Like what he brings hate the contract) and we have Belanger and Lander for 2013 than Sammy doesn't fit but should bring a valuable piece on D.

I still want the Oilers to swing a deal with the rangers for Dubinsky then I would trade Gagner this year for a top 4 Dman.

Avatar
#187 They're $hittie
July 20 2011, 06:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

i am starting to think that horcoffs contract may soon be trable once the cap hit is higher than the salart. those cap floor teams are always looking for those contracts and a veteran with experience and a two way game. if we find a gm looking to save his skin and doesnt have much to spend this may work.

the next question is, in the 12-13 season is horcoff needed on the oilers

Avatar
#188 OilFan
July 20 2011, 08:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@They're $hittie

It depends on how Gagners season goes.

Avatar
#189 They're $hittie
July 20 2011, 09:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
OilFan wrote:

It depends on how Gagners season goes.

agreed and that is why i posted it in this article.

Avatar
#190 Woodguy
July 20 2011, 09:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Kodiak wrote:

Jeff Carter: 82GP 46g 38a 84pts +23

Henrik Sedin: 76gp 11g 31a 42pts +23

Saku Koivu: 65gp 14g 30a 44pts -7

Patrick Sharp: 50gp 9g 14a 23pts +1

Mike Richards: 79gp 30g 50a 80pts +22

Ryan Kesler: 82gp 26g 33a 59pts +8

David Krejci: 82gp 22g 51a 73pts +37 (3rd season)

Martin St.Louis: 82gp 33g 37a 70pts +10

Joe Pavelski: 80gp 25g 34a 59pts +5 (3rd season)

Travis Zajac: 82gp 20g 42a 62pts +33 (3rd season)

Paul Stastny: 82gp 28g 50a 78pts +4 (as a 21 yr old, drafted 44th overall the year before Sam)

Sam Gagner: 68gp 15g 27a 42pts -17

Here's another fun exercise, let's compare these players in their fourth NHL season (or prior) when growing pains and age shouldn't be used as an excuse. Age is an excuse because of lack of experience. If you've played 4 years in the league you should have figured out what it's all about by then and what you need to bring to the table.

Kodiak,

Read this:

http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2010/1/21/1261318/nhl-points-per-game-peak-age

Avatar
#191 Smythyyyy
July 20 2011, 10:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Dman09 wrote:

What about maybe Gagner, a defensive prospect like Chorney and draft picks too San Jose for Brent Burns.

Why would you do that? Brent Burns is a UFA next year.

Avatar
#192 Zarny
July 22 2011, 10:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

In Sam's defense the team was a lot worse the previous 2 years than his first two.

He's had 4 years of 2nd line production. He'll have to take the next step soon to be a bona fide 1st line C.

Avatar
#193 FastOil
July 23 2011, 11:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Archaeologuy wrote:

I'm comparing them because they put up almost equal numbers but one is a star on the rise and the other has plateaued and wont amount to anything (according to you). Jordan Eberle is not heads and tails better than Gagner defensively, you just think that because you have much lower expectations for him than you do for Gagner.

I never said there werent advantages to playing in the NHL, but what advantages there are for developing your game in the NHL dont make up for extra years to work on deficiencies with little to no pressure.

By my thought process players do NOT improve at the same rate, but they do keep improving past the age of 21 no matter how many years they played in the NHL.

By YOUR thought process all players should develop equally based on years in the league, completely ignoring the total amount of development post draft or physical maturity. It's completely unrealistic.

Arch,

Eberle can skate effectively.

Gagner cannot skate effectively.

This is the heart of the matter.

It is why Eberle is as good or better after 1 season, which to me is not ok.

Comments are closed for this article.