Rear Window

Lowetide
August 03 2011 05:00PM

Miles and miles from the lottery, Edmonton's NHL team is drafting good hockey players. That is rarely enough, as we all know that 99% of life's success comes from following through.

A good way to gauge a team's draft success is by counting the number of kids who are developed the old fashioned way: the minors. Seeing a #1 overall pick turn out is great fun, but also expected; even a pick like Sam Gagner should deliver a quality NHL player.

It's the "following through" that makes the difference: taking talented kids and grinding them into useful role players for the National Hockey League. Those men--the tough defensemen, the two way centers, the physical wingers--are extremely valuable to an NHL team.

BENCH STRENGTH

During the twelve year period leading up to the OKC Barons taking to the ice, Oiler fans saw a lot of fits and starts from the club's AHL prospects. Here's a list of Oilers picks and minor league free agents who began their pro careers in the AHL and were good enough to play a game (or more) for the Oilers:

  1. R Georges Laraque 695 games
  2. C Shawn Horcoff 684 games
  3. L Jason Chimera 581 games
  4. C Jarret Stoll 515 games
  5. R Fernando Pisani 462 games
  6. D Marc Andre Bergeron 422 games
  7. D Matt Greene 379 games
  8. D Tom Gilbert 337 games
  9. C Kyle Brodziak 337 games
  10. R Brad Winchester 323 games
  11. R Zack Stortini 256 games
  12. D Alexei Semenov 211 games
  13. G Ty Conklin 200 games
  14. C Marc Pouliot 179 games
  15. L JF Jacques 160 games
  16. C Rob Schremp 114 games
  17. L Patrick Thoresen 106 games
  18. D Theo Peckham 102 games
  19. L Liam Reddox 100 games
  20. L Tony Salmelainen 70 games
  21. R Jani Rita 66 games
  22. D Mathieu Roy 65 games
  23. D Danny Syvret 59 games
  24. G Jeff Deslauriers 58 games
  25. D Taylor Chorney 56 games
  26. G Devan Dubnyk 54 games
  27. D Ales Pisa 53 games
  28. C Tim Sestito 46 games
  29. G Mike Morrison 29 games
  30. D Bryan Young 17 games
  31. C Mike Bishai 14 games
  32. L Michel Riesen 12 games
  33. C Peter Sarno 7 games
  34. D Alex Plante 7 games
  35. D Chris Hajt 6 games
  36. D Doug Lynch 2 games
  37. L Alexei Mikhnov 2 games
  38. R Colin McDonald 2 games
  39. G Mike Minard 1 game
  40. D Johan Motin 1 game

Guys like Tom Poti, Mike Comrie, Ales Hemsky, Sam Gagner didn't play in the AHL and Sebastien Bisaillon played all of his NHL games before he played in the AHL. I didn't count those players.

Results

  1. Over those 12 seasons, the Oilers developed about 1 player per year if we assume an NHL player graduates at 200 games.
  2. The Oilers also have several players "on track" to pass 200 games. I'd count Pouliot, Jacques, Schremp and Peckham as "on track" players.
  3. I think we should agree a lower total seems fair for goaltenders. Let's say 125 games for goalers. That would mean that Dubnyk is "on track" as well.
  4. Total: 13 players at 200 games or more and another 5 "on track" for the 12 seasons. That works out to 1.5 actual NHL players per season.

HARD NOSE THE HIGHWAY

The Oilers under Steve Tambellini have made an effort to employ AHL veterans who can help bring the prospects along. This might include facing tough opposition until the kids find their way, scoring enough goals for the team to be confident and competitive, and serving a mentor role as the boys transition into their pro careers. It's a very important job, one that may have helped Pouliot, McDonald, Jacques, Schremp and others in the last decade.

OKC (so far)

  1. R Linus Omark 51 games
  2. D Jeff Petry 35 games
  3. L Teemu Hartikainen 12 games
  4. C Chris VandeVelde 12 games

Guys like Taylor Hall, Magnus Paajarvi and Jordan Eberle didn't play in the AHL, and I've included Petry in this group because this was his first full pro season. I don't know that we can project any of these kids for 200 NHL games, but they certainly showed some things in year one. There's some outstanding talent among those four names. Anton Lander, Curtis Hamilton and others may soon join the list.

That's a helluva first season.

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on Team 1260.
Avatar
#51 Romanus
August 03 2011, 09:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@a lg dubl dubl

How did he screw up the Smyth trade? He got him for pretty much nothing. Lombardi is a windbag that's likely more pissed about the Penner deal.

Avatar
#52 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
August 03 2011, 10:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
DSF wrote:

I guess big numbers like 82 games X 30 teams confuse you. Unless you have some evidence that the Oilers' team scorers are less likely to hand out hit stats.

Which, of course, you don't so your comments are totally irrelevant.

And, if you're basing his "production" as a tenth overall pick on his rookie season...he's clearly been sub par.

The comment is completly relavant.

LT says he doesn't trust hit totals... Thiers no way to prove it either way, but if guys play 41 games in an arena that has lower standards for hits their numbers will be higher then those that play in arenas with tougher standards.

Pretty simple.

And I don't know what kind of non-sense you are trying to push with your last sentence. A quick look at past 10th overall picks shows he's doing quite well for himself.

I do however agree he's got a long way to go before he proves he'll have a solid NHL career.

Avatar
#53 Paul C
August 03 2011, 11:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Perhaps I missed something in your criteria, but Jordan Eberle did play in the AHL. He played a combined 20 games with the Springfield Falcons in 2008-09 and 2009-10.

Avatar
#54 @Oilanderp
August 03 2011, 11:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
gowi48 wrote:

Hey whats with Stauffer and Oilers lunch. Is it toast

Brutal eh? I don't live in Edmonton and used to listen only via podcasts. There's nothing on the CHED site that I can find.

Kinda completely screwed my daily oilers-related fix.

*pounds his fist in internet anger*

Avatar
#55 Mike Modano's Dog
August 03 2011, 11:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
DSF wrote:

By almost any measure, Paajarvi had a disappointing season for a 10th overall pick.

His P/60 were well south of the rookie crop of 10/11, his plus/minus was near the bottom of the barrel, his shooting percentage trailed at least one rookie defenseman, his 5v4 P/60 was a little better but hardly in the same area code as the top rookies and he was 399th in the NHL for hits per 60 by a forward.

Comparing him to a complete bust like Steve Kelly might pump his tires somewhat, but why not compare him to top 10 draft choices who actaully 'ripped off a season at 19".

Hold off on the coronation.

Let me guess, this is either Robbie Schremp looking for a job or Kevin Prendergast.

Someone just listed you the last 10 years of #10 overall picks, and you gloss over that fact (perhaps you didn't read it) while focusing on other meaningless stats instead.

"By any measure Paajarvi had a disappointing season for a 10th overall pick" Really? If you're looking at the sport of hockey he is doing really well as a 10th overall pick. We just saw the last 10 years of them and he is looking VERY GOOD for his draft position.

Players tend to not be as good in their rookie season as later on in their careers. I thought I'd point out that trend. He finished in the top 15 in the whole league for rookies, many of whom are older than him. His -15 on a team as bad as the Oilers, not being given the most definsive linemates, is very reasonable, I think. There were a lot of Oilers this year in that same position. Defensively he is actually quite good - especially for a 19 year old. He works really hard at it, and anyone can tell he busts his butt coming back in his own zone. How many 10th overall choices can you say that about?

If you're just wanting to treat him (a mistake) as just a player and ignore the fact he was 19, and a rookie, you could do that. His points rank him 178th in the league, which would make him the 6th best forward on an NHL team, averaging it out (you divide by 30, as you like to say), and his goals have him 167th best, which would average out to the 5th best forward on NHL teams. Not bad for his first year.

You're really stuck on the fact he didn't seem to hit very much. Might that be because he's not a hitter?

I'm just wondering if you're hiding behind statistics instead of just saying you don't like him? If that's the case, just say it then. He was top-10 in the league as a rookie in games played, shots and more importantly, goals. So he got a lot of experience, and thrived in the end.

Oh, and you're right, LT perhaps shouldn't have compared him to Steve Kelly - Steve Kelly was drafted 4 spots before him. The reason I believe it was a good point, however, is that the point he was trying to make is that recent draft choices have been quite good so far. Comparing them to others, including Steve Kelly, drafted in an earlier era by different men were not as successful. You're saying the opposite doesn't make it true.

"Let the coronation begin!"

Avatar
#56 ed in mada
August 04 2011, 03:48AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F wrote:

Lets see some of this MBS guys actually become quality NHL players before we get too excited.

I agree. Not trying to be negative, but at this point there are a lot of SM picks that are showing promise and hopefully will develop but not much more than that. We will know much more in 3 years.

Avatar
#57 book¡e
August 04 2011, 06:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Mike Modano's Dog wrote:

Let me guess, this is either Robbie Schremp looking for a job or Kevin Prendergast.

Someone just listed you the last 10 years of #10 overall picks, and you gloss over that fact (perhaps you didn't read it) while focusing on other meaningless stats instead.

"By any measure Paajarvi had a disappointing season for a 10th overall pick" Really? If you're looking at the sport of hockey he is doing really well as a 10th overall pick. We just saw the last 10 years of them and he is looking VERY GOOD for his draft position.

Players tend to not be as good in their rookie season as later on in their careers. I thought I'd point out that trend. He finished in the top 15 in the whole league for rookies, many of whom are older than him. His -15 on a team as bad as the Oilers, not being given the most definsive linemates, is very reasonable, I think. There were a lot of Oilers this year in that same position. Defensively he is actually quite good - especially for a 19 year old. He works really hard at it, and anyone can tell he busts his butt coming back in his own zone. How many 10th overall choices can you say that about?

If you're just wanting to treat him (a mistake) as just a player and ignore the fact he was 19, and a rookie, you could do that. His points rank him 178th in the league, which would make him the 6th best forward on an NHL team, averaging it out (you divide by 30, as you like to say), and his goals have him 167th best, which would average out to the 5th best forward on NHL teams. Not bad for his first year.

You're really stuck on the fact he didn't seem to hit very much. Might that be because he's not a hitter?

I'm just wondering if you're hiding behind statistics instead of just saying you don't like him? If that's the case, just say it then. He was top-10 in the league as a rookie in games played, shots and more importantly, goals. So he got a lot of experience, and thrived in the end.

Oh, and you're right, LT perhaps shouldn't have compared him to Steve Kelly - Steve Kelly was drafted 4 spots before him. The reason I believe it was a good point, however, is that the point he was trying to make is that recent draft choices have been quite good so far. Comparing them to others, including Steve Kelly, drafted in an earlier era by different men were not as successful. You're saying the opposite doesn't make it true.

"Let the coronation begin!"

Mike - DSF basically spends his time making quasi-rational or irrational arguments to try and goat people into debating him. He then intensely engages for the whole thread. Keep that in mind when you read (or skip over) his posts.

Avatar
#58 cableguy - 2nd Tier Fan
August 04 2011, 07:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
book¡e wrote:

Mike - DSF basically spends his time making quasi-rational or irrational arguments to try and goat people into debating him. He then intensely engages for the whole thread. Keep that in mind when you read (or skip over) his posts.

the DSF handbook basically amounts to:

1) throw out random post re:horcoff,schremp,gagner,mact

2) have BS called

3) ignore those posts

4) throw out more random stuff

5) have that BS called

6) ignore those posts too

Avatar
#59 @Oilanderp
August 04 2011, 08:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

*frantically chases DSF down the street while viewers watch riveted by the Blair Witch low-tech documentary-style camera*

DSF! DSF! How do you respond to the allegations that you are a sh*t distrurber with little substance and a penchant for ignoring the truth?

*microphone is slapped out of view as black-gloved hands grab for the camera*

DSF! DSF! Oiler Nationers demand to know! How do you respond?

*struggle for the camera resumes as DSF hops in a white Chev Blazer and peels away*

(cut to static)
[scene]

Avatar
#60 michael
August 04 2011, 08:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
@Oilanderp wrote:

Brutal eh? I don't live in Edmonton and used to listen only via podcasts. There's nothing on the CHED site that I can find.

Kinda completely screwed my daily oilers-related fix.

*pounds his fist in internet anger*

Typical of Ched. They get the number 1 sports show in the city and they don't even post it on thier website. Not even a frakin billboard with Stauff's big old pusss plastered on it. I'll be podcasting Stauffers show myself. Spec's new show should be a trainwreck in the best way. No holds bar when its comes to Spec. With Spec there will be a few animated conversations I think.With Spec he dosen't have to pull his punches because he dosen't work for the Oilers like Stauffer.Plus 630 ched bites. They have a built in audience being the rights holders. If they didn't have those rights who would listen to them. Especiallly Tencer.

Avatar
#61 Mike Krushelnyski
August 04 2011, 09:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

You should have put #mikebishai on that list, guy loves to search himself.

Fun fact, he's this crazy irl: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCQld1IbYMI

Avatar
#62 Ender
August 04 2011, 09:02AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

justDOit wrote:

why doesn't my keyboard have a cents symbol?

¢learly a ¢ase of defe¢tive produ¢t.

Avatar
#63 @Oilanderp
August 04 2011, 09:10AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@michael

Well let me know how i can get a copy if u are making a podcast!

Avatar
#64 Talbot17
August 04 2011, 09:25AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

In regards to past posts, I got to agree if you are the Oilers you got to take a hard look at a potential Webber inquiry at some point. Considering the Oilers invested a decent cap hit into Pronger a couple of years back, and we saw how a big all round defenseman did for our club (via Stanley Cup appearance in year 1 of the Pronger saga) I think its a worthwhile and legitimate thing to consider. I tend to see a lot of the Oilers D being those guys that 'complement' a very good Defensemen who is a workhorse. Gilbert was better with Whitney, then you look at Petry and Chorney coming into the system, a Smid is better paired with a better D, etc.

You will say" yeah but any defensemen is better with a really good D at their pairing", but it is evident the Oilers still need a strong all round D like Webber and I think Detroit realizes this and will be the new home for Webber come trade deadline day if the Oilers don't get their act together.

As for their draft selections, i am high on Marcinen, and I get a good feeling about Teubert too. Teubert reminds me of a second coming of Ryan Whitney, maybe not as offensive minded but a guy you could see playing 20+ minutes a game and be a good shut down D in a playoff series

Avatar
#65 Ender
August 04 2011, 09:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

A lot of people have been connecting Weber with Detroit in the past couple of days. What is this based on? There are 30 teams in the NHL and every one of them would be happy to have Weber wear their sweater. I realize that Detroit has been a very good team for a long time, but that doesn't make it the default home for every stud player in the NHL.

Maybe Weber gets signed in Edmonton, maybe he goes to Detroit . . . . . or maybe, he goes to one of the other 28 teams in the NHL. Odds weigh heavily on the third choice, yes?

Avatar
#66 madjam
August 04 2011, 09:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

ONation far to conservative , negative and pessimistic about this upcoming season . My prediction this year is they will be better than what most of you predict .

This season should see Gagner and Brule (if he can avoid injury bug ) with a major breakthrough . Last years rookies with decent jump in progress . Defence that might even be respectfull . The tools are on the table for entire club to have many positive breakthroughs unlike last few years ! Their should be unprecedented growth throughout the team this season due to new acquisitions and some newbies as well interjected into lineup .

We will be competitive , have a good shot at playoffs this season and possibly more .I expect to be right again on my prediction for our team this season , just like i was the last 3 seasons .

Avatar
#67 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
August 04 2011, 09:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
madjam wrote:

ONation far to conservative , negative and pessimistic about this upcoming season . My prediction this year is they will be better than what most of you predict .

This season should see Gagner and Brule (if he can avoid injury bug ) with a major breakthrough . Last years rookies with decent jump in progress . Defence that might even be respectfull . The tools are on the table for entire club to have many positive breakthroughs unlike last few years ! Their should be unprecedented growth throughout the team this season due to new acquisitions and some newbies as well interjected into lineup .

We will be competitive , have a good shot at playoffs this season and possibly more .I expect to be right again on my prediction for our team this season , just like i was the last 3 seasons .

Got this saved on a word dock for when you start your 6 months of complaining about the team/managment... sometime around mid Oct.

Avatar
#68 har de har har
August 04 2011, 10:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F wrote:

Got this saved on a word dock for when you start your 6 months of complaining about the team/managment... sometime around mid Oct.

TOO FUNNY

Avatar
#69 TigerUnderGlass
August 04 2011, 10:24AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Ender wrote:

A lot of people have been connecting Weber with Detroit in the past couple of days. What is this based on? There are 30 teams in the NHL and every one of them would be happy to have Weber wear their sweater. I realize that Detroit has been a very good team for a long time, but that doesn't make it the default home for every stud player in the NHL.

Maybe Weber gets signed in Edmonton, maybe he goes to Detroit . . . . . or maybe, he goes to one of the other 28 teams in the NHL. Odds weigh heavily on the third choice, yes?

Are you saying you will give me 29-1 odds on Weber signing in Detroit?

Avatar
#70 @Oilanderp
August 04 2011, 10:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

With all this talk of making offer sheets, and given that the Oilers will have some prime offer sheet candidates against them in a few years, I'd be interested in seeing an examination done on how long the 'ill-will' (if any) lasts between GMs once an offer sheet is made on one of their young stars. More precisely, if say the Oil make an offer on Weber next year, what chance is there that we can see the Preds trying to pick one of our stars in 2 years?

is there enough of a correlation to stay away from making an RFA offer sheet?

Avatar
#71 Dman09
August 04 2011, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
TigerUnderGlass wrote:

Are you saying you will give me 29-1 odds on Weber signing in Detroit?

That might be worth the bet but it also depends on Weber, maybe he feels a younger developing team may be better suited as they are hungry for the cup and the playoffs. Or maybe he wants location and will be looking for a deal in Cali.

Avatar
#72 Dman09
August 04 2011, 10:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
@Oilanderp wrote:

With all this talk of making offer sheets, and given that the Oilers will have some prime offer sheet candidates against them in a few years, I'd be interested in seeing an examination done on how long the 'ill-will' (if any) lasts between GMs once an offer sheet is made on one of their young stars. More precisely, if say the Oil make an offer on Weber next year, what chance is there that we can see the Preds trying to pick one of our stars in 2 years?

is there enough of a correlation to stay away from making an RFA offer sheet?

I think you might see the offer sheet structure change for the next CBA. GMs find offers sheets on star players to be pointless because you give up so much and still have to pay full price. It only seems to work on players with lower salaries where the compensation makes sense.

Avatar
#73 TigerUnderGlass
August 04 2011, 10:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Dman09 wrote:

That might be worth the bet but it also depends on Weber, maybe he feels a younger developing team may be better suited as they are hungry for the cup and the playoffs. Or maybe he wants location and will be looking for a deal in Cali.

Certainly other factors come into play, but the point is that not all teams have an equal chance at signing a player like that. There are at most a handful of teams the could realistically sign him.

Avatar
#74 Ender
August 04 2011, 10:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
TigerUnderGlass wrote:

Certainly other factors come into play, but the point is that not all teams have an equal chance at signing a player like that. There are at most a handful of teams the could realistically sign him.

Vegas wouldn't give 29:1. I'd go as high as 15:1. I understand your point, but any team can make room; it's just a matter of how bad the team wants him over what they're willing to give up.

If your argument is that the Winnipeg Jets could never hope to sign Weber, then maybe Oilers fans should stop beating the 'sign Weber' drum as well.

Avatar
#75 Quicksilver ballet
August 04 2011, 11:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
TigerUnderGlass wrote:

Certainly other factors come into play, but the point is that not all teams have an equal chance at signing a player like that. There are at most a handful of teams the could realistically sign him.

Detroit always seems to be in everyones top three, i was hoping Edmonton would be on that expanded list of 6. As long as we make his acceptable destination list the Oilers may have a shot at a trade and sign when the time comes. Have to think Edmonton could get back on that A list (top 3) in the next 12-18 months, so the Shea Weber to Edmonton talk is tolerable as far as i'm concerned. Weber may not be moved for atleast 12 months anyways. In that time frame, Edmonton will have as good a shot at making a deal for Weber as anybody.

Avatar
#76 Dman09
August 04 2011, 11:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Ender wrote:

Vegas wouldn't give 29:1. I'd go as high as 15:1. I understand your point, but any team can make room; it's just a matter of how bad the team wants him over what they're willing to give up.

If your argument is that the Winnipeg Jets could never hope to sign Weber, then maybe Oilers fans should stop beating the 'sign Weber' drum as well.

I still think it has more to do with what Weber wants than what teams are willing to offer him. If he wants to be somewhere warm and sunny and thats what matters the most to him then Edmonton, WPG, and even Detroit will have no chance of getting him no matter what they offer.

Avatar
#77 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
August 04 2011, 11:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think people look at Det as a destination for Weber because you'd think Lidstrom will retire one of these days.

Avatar
#78 Talbot17
August 04 2011, 11:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think Webber could potentially see the value of joining a team like Detroit who has a history of 'appreciating' Elite D in this league ( a la Lindstrom, Kronwall to an extent) and if that Nashville hate exists, Detroit is in that division...course if they don't go to the East Conf. or NSH to East either.

The Oilers got to consider him. He never seemed tired in the playoffs against Vancouver and to me is top 3 best D in league

Avatar
#79 Bob Cob
August 04 2011, 11:24AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Why is it important how many hits MPS has or where he is ranked in the league? Just becuase MPS doesn't go out of his way looking to make the big hit, like so many Defensemen do, example Dion Phaneuf, doesn't mean MPS is soft. I bet he will hit when given the chance, besides he is a rookie, has to learn the NA style of game and adjust to the size of the rink. He will be a 25 goal, 60-70 pt guy, he showed flashes last year. Give the kid a break, its no wonder players want to leave Edmonton.

Avatar
#80 Ender
August 04 2011, 11:33AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Owen Nolan (cover of NHL2001) to tryout for the Canucks this season.

At 39, that's a bit of a stretch, no? Is that really how he wants to end things? 40 games on a checking line in Vancouver?

Avatar
#81 mayorpoop
August 04 2011, 11:48AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

i would have little to no doubt weber would sign for less in detroit, pending they are still competitive, at less money than the arbitrator just gave him. some guys just want to win and maybe im out to lunch but he seems like that type of player.

he can have his cake and eat it to.

Avatar
#82 TigerUnderGlass
August 04 2011, 11:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Ender

I understand your point, but any team can make room; it's just a matter of how bad the team wants him over what they're willing to give up.

Yes and no. I would suggest that somewhere near half the league would represent teams he would not want to go to. Then, of the teams he would approve of, some would not be interested due to either cap concerns or personnel already in place. I would suggest Chicago as an example of a team that would not be interested in Weber.

If your argument is that the Winnipeg Jets could never hope to sign Weber, then maybe Oilers fans should stop beating the 'sign Weber' drum as well.

This I agree with completely. I don't see the Oilers as a realistic destination unless they take an unexpectedly big leap forward this season.

It doesn't mean we shouldn't look into things though. I have a real problem with the fact that reportedly no teams even approached Stamkos before he signed, and none have approached Doughty. As a GM how do you not at least make a phone call about guys like that?

Avatar
#83 Mike Krushelnyski
August 04 2011, 01:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Ender wrote:

Owen Nolan (cover of NHL2001) to tryout for the Canucks this season.

At 39, that's a bit of a stretch, no? Is that really how he wants to end things? 40 games on a checking line in Vancouver?

He just wants to take one final shootout so he can call his shot, then immediately retire.

Avatar
#84 DSF
August 04 2011, 02:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Detroit has four defensemen hitting UFA status next season...Lidstrom, Stuart, Kronwall and Commodore.

Weber could easily slide right into that lineup.

Avatar
#85 Dman09
August 04 2011, 02:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@TigerUnderGlass

They were restricted, your not allowed to.

Avatar
#86 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
August 04 2011, 02:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Dman09 wrote:

They were restricted, your not allowed to.

~Which makes it even more impressive that all those other RFA's were able to agree to contracts with new teams... when the team wasn't allowed to contact them.~

Avatar
#87 Ender
August 04 2011, 02:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
DSF wrote:

Detroit has four defensemen hitting UFA status next season...Lidstrom, Stuart, Kronwall and Commodore.

Weber could easily slide right into that lineup.

The Tampa Bay Lightning have four UFA's coming up during the same period, and an RFA too. I guess he could 'slide right into that lineup' as well.

Except, why would you want to? Wouldn't you much rather go to a completely solid team who just needed that one last piece to win a Stanley (ie. you) than one that was in complete flux and was turning over their entire defensive core?

I suspect Weber could 'slide right into' a number of teams and do very well. If your point is that Detroit will need him, well, who doesn't?

Avatar
#88 dawgbone
August 04 2011, 02:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
TigerUnderGlass wrote:
I understand your point, but any team can make room; it's just a matter of how bad the team wants him over what they're willing to give up.

Yes and no. I would suggest that somewhere near half the league would represent teams he would not want to go to. Then, of the teams he would approve of, some would not be interested due to either cap concerns or personnel already in place. I would suggest Chicago as an example of a team that would not be interested in Weber.

If your argument is that the Winnipeg Jets could never hope to sign Weber, then maybe Oilers fans should stop beating the 'sign Weber' drum as well.

This I agree with completely. I don't see the Oilers as a realistic destination unless they take an unexpectedly big leap forward this season.

It doesn't mean we shouldn't look into things though. I have a real problem with the fact that reportedly no teams even approached Stamkos before he signed, and none have approached Doughty. As a GM how do you not at least make a phone call about guys like that?

Because Burke will scream at you and you'll feel shame.

Avatar
#89 Ender
August 04 2011, 03:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I confess to some curiosity surrounding the picture at the head of this article. I didn't recognize the guy, so I looked at the properties and then ran a search-engine on the result "Burr".

I didn't come up with anything on the guy, but I was introduced to a Rachel Burr. She was worth the search time. Thanks, Lowetide, but maybe you posted the wrong Burr by accident?

Avatar
#90 Wax Man Riley
August 04 2011, 03:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
madjam wrote:

ONation far to conservative , negative and pessimistic about this upcoming season . My prediction this year is they will be better than what most of you predict .

This season should see Gagner and Brule (if he can avoid injury bug ) with a major breakthrough . Last years rookies with decent jump in progress . Defence that might even be respectfull . The tools are on the table for entire club to have many positive breakthroughs unlike last few years ! Their should be unprecedented growth throughout the team this season due to new acquisitions and some newbies as well interjected into lineup .

We will be competitive , have a good shot at playoffs this season and possibly more .I expect to be right again on my prediction for our team this season , just like i was the last 3 seasons .

To be fair, regarding your last sentence, a trained platypus could predict the Oil at the bottom of the league and out of the playoffs the last few years. Even Vancouver fans said that....

Avatar
#91 Wax Man Riley
August 04 2011, 03:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Ender wrote:

Owen Nolan (cover of NHL2001) to tryout for the Canucks this season.

At 39, that's a bit of a stretch, no? Is that really how he wants to end things? 40 games on a checking line in Vancouver?

....and choking in the playoffs....

Avatar
#92 Wax Man Riley
August 04 2011, 03:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Weber... what about Boston? If I were Weber, I'd look into it.

San Jose? Detroit (my guess is that Detroit will pursue him aggressively with Lidstrom retiring.

Avatar
#93 Wax Man Riley
August 04 2011, 03:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Wax Man Riley wrote:

To be fair, regarding your last sentence, a trained platypus could predict the Oil at the bottom of the league and out of the playoffs the last few years. Even Vancouver fans said that....

madjam wrote:

We will be competitive , have a good shot at playoffs this season and possibly more .I expect to be right again on my prediction for our team this season , just like i was the last 3 seasons .

My prediction? Same thing I predict every year. They will win the Stanley Cup and the parade will start in Clareview and end in Terwillegar. I have already ordered the confetti to be thrown from the tops of buildings of downtown as the parade comes down Gretzky to 112 ave to 19 st to Jasper and onward.

Edit: forgot to mention that they will play The Jets in the SCF

Avatar
#94 John Chambers
August 04 2011, 03:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Ender

I think the idea being that Detroit has a lot of money coming off the books for next year and will want to re-build their D.

But to your point - who wants to play for a Red Wings team that will see both Lidstrom and Rafalski absent for 2012 and beyond?

Tiger had a good point - maybe this is the year to really aspire to get out of the draft lottery to prove to the UFA class that the Oil are the team of the future and their best shot at a Stanley is with us.

Avatar
#95 Dan the Man
August 04 2011, 03:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Ender wrote:

I confess to some curiosity surrounding the picture at the head of this article. I didn't recognize the guy, so I looked at the properties and then ran a search-engine on the result "Burr".

I didn't come up with anything on the guy, but I was introduced to a Rachel Burr. She was worth the search time. Thanks, Lowetide, but maybe you posted the wrong Burr by accident?

That would be Raymond Burr, who starred in the Hitchcock classic "Rear Window".

Avatar
#96 Ender
August 04 2011, 03:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Dan the Man

While the tie-in now makes sense (Lars Thorwald), I still think it was a reverse-freudian slip on the part of LT. ;-)

Avatar
#97 DSF
August 04 2011, 04:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Ender wrote:

The Tampa Bay Lightning have four UFA's coming up during the same period, and an RFA too. I guess he could 'slide right into that lineup' as well.

Except, why would you want to? Wouldn't you much rather go to a completely solid team who just needed that one last piece to win a Stanley (ie. you) than one that was in complete flux and was turning over their entire defensive core?

I suspect Weber could 'slide right into' a number of teams and do very well. If your point is that Detroit will need him, well, who doesn't?

Of course everyone "needs" him, including Nashville, but it's pretty obvious that he wants to join a winner.

Detroit, Tampa, Boston and San Jose, Vancouver and Washington would seem like the odds on favorites.

Avatar
#98 Dan the Man
August 04 2011, 04:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Ender

I just googled Rachel Burr, she's slightly hotter than Raymond.

Avatar
#99 Westcoastoil
August 04 2011, 04:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Dan the Man wrote:

I just googled Rachel Burr, she's slightly hotter than Raymond.

Sweet Jesus, thanks for that afternoon pick me up!

Avatar
#100 pelhem grenville
August 04 2011, 04:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
pelhem grenville wrote:

...fist Raymond Burr art...very nice...reading now

comment#4

Comments are closed for this article.