THE HUMAN TOLL: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

Robin Brownlee
September 01 2011 11:06AM

With Sidney Crosby's hockey career hanging in the balance because of concussions and Marc Savard's apparently over, the NHL's overdue decision to address headshots in the game is a classic case of being a day late and a dollar short.

Given the alarming number of NHL players who've been forced to retire because of concussions in the past decade and the growing body of medical evidence of the short-term and long-term effects of concussions on the brain, why has it taken having the career of the game's marquee name, Crosby, put in jeopardy to prompt the league to address the issue?

Aside from attention to concussions beyond lip service being a case of better late than never, protocols and rule changes being put in place and contemplated for the 2011-12 season by NHL decision-makers don't go nearly far enough.

How much brain damage in the name of the game, in the name of our entertainment, is enough? How many players will have careers ended and their long-term health and well-being compromised by concussions before the NHL eliminates all head shots?

It can't happen soon enough.

DEVASTATING TOLL

Crosby's struggles with post-concussion symptoms have forced the issue of head shots to the top of commissioner Gary Bettman's list of things to do because he's the biggest name in the game. Having the career of Savard, a very good player but not a household name, cut short in a life-impairing fog has helped to do likewise.

But, considering the long list of players who've been impaired by concussions, it should never have taken this long for the NHL and NHLPA to stop looking the other way and do something about it.

You want a list marquee players who've had their careers cut short by concussions? Off the top of my head, there's Pat LaFontaine, in 1998, Paul Kariya, Eric Lindros, Keith Primeau, Geoff Courtnall and Adam Deadmarsh. Will Crosby be the next? We don't know.

Tough guys? Raitis Ivanans, Matthew Barnaby, Stu Grimson, Gino Odjick, Cam Stewart, Nick Kypreos, Kevin Kaminski and Robin Bawa. Other players forced to retire include Dave Scatchard, Brad Werenka, Jayson More, Dean Chynoweth, Brett Lindros, Steve Rucchin, Jeff Beukeboom, Steven Rice and former Oiler Paul Comrie.

With the risks inherent in the game, that list is certain to grow no matter what rules are put in place -- concussions can and do occur because of physical contact where there is no direct blow to the head. That said, it's the responsibility of the NHL to mitigate those risks.

TIME HAS COME

While rule changes regarding blindside hits to the head and protocols calling for more thorough assessments of players showing any signs of concussion are a start, they don't go far enough.

There is a growing number of people who believe any blow to the head of a player, by blindside hit or otherwise, should be dealt with by penalties and supplemental discipline. I count myself in that group.

That calls into question, among other things, the issue of eliminating fighting, which I've already written about oilersnation.com/2011/3/21/fighting-what-cost-tradition. That's a question I would never have entertained 10 years ago. It's part of the game, after all. If you don't like it, go play badminton, right?

Of course, with the pay scale in the NHL, there will always be young men willing to take whatever risks are involved without a single thought about the long-term consequences. NHL career? Where do I sign up? And there will always be fans willing to buy tickets to watch them do it.

Given the medical evidence and the growing list of casualties, it's time to re-think what's an acceptable level of risk for players. Likewise, what grim realities we're willing to turn a blind eye to in the name of entertainment.

Listen to Robin Brownlee Wednesdays and Thursdays from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. on the Jason Gregor Show on TEAM 1260.

Aceb4a1816f5fa09879a023b07d1a9b4
A sports writer since 1983, including stints at The Edmonton Journal and The Sun 1989-2007, I happily co-host the Jason Gregor Show on TSN 1260 twice a week and write when so inclined. Have the best damn lawn on the internet. Most important, I am Sam's dad. Follow me on Twitter at Robin_Brownlee. Or don't.
Avatar
#1 Archaeologuy
September 01 2011, 11:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
10
props

I still dont understand how the league can allow the hard plastic shoulder and elbow pads. No one can tell me that a safer and softer product cant be made. Even if it only saves 1 player from concussion at least the league can say it took one more precaution towards player safety.

Avatar
#3 Quicksilver ballet
September 01 2011, 11:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
3
props
Robin Brownlee wrote:

"Hockey's fine just the way it is....so its been a rough summer, just carry on like nothing has happened and it'll blow over. This is why they get paid the big bucks."

Have we become this callous? Our entertainment is at stake, so what's a little collateral damage? Do you actually feel this way?

It's this element of real danger that sets the game of hockey above Pro Wrestling Robin. We don't need skaters whipping around the ice all wearing the Hans device. It's fine just the way it is. 11 months ago MacIntyre knocked out Ivanans in the opening game of the year. Most remember that fight moreso than the final score of that game.....just sayin.

Avatar
#4 Archaeologuy
September 01 2011, 12:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
3
props
thepeetso wrote:

Make the rink bigger.

They're still playing on the same size rink they did 50 years ago.

But now the players are on average 6 inches taller, 40 pounds heavier and twice as fast.

There is no space, no time to react and brace yourself. It's no wonder there is so many concussions.

You don't have to go to a European rink size but the time has come to enlarge the ice surface.

What if.

What if the NHL does this and it turns out that what happens is that the game gets even faster because now these elite athletes have more time and space to gear up.

Could that not be seen as something that could increase violent collisions and in turn ratchet up concussions?

Just throwing out a different take on that scenario.

Avatar
#5 Dobolo
September 01 2011, 12:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
3
props

I love how everyone blames the NHL for the concussion issues. Where is the NHLPA on this? They should be the ones that should be beating the drum the loudest to protect their players. Where is the onus on the individual players to play the game with respect and dignity. Stop putting the blame on the NHL entity which is too easy to do and start placing the responsibility within the players hands. If the players really wanted to fix it, they could.

Avatar
#6 positivebrontefan
September 01 2011, 11:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

Young Paul Comrie still has bad days from Post Concussion Syndrome.

Avatar
#7 rahza Ghul
September 01 2011, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

I've always been an advocate of violence in sports. The second these guys step on the ice they know the risks.

I was watching scott stevens hits yesterday...the ones on kozlov, adams would be considered illegal in today game which is BS.

These players will eventually get paid millions for shinny.

Tthe only wreckless actions that occur inthe league are how players are dealt with once they get off the ice. They claim that NHL is a business, well if thats the case the players are thier assets, take care of the assets off the ice and lets them do what they do best on the ice.

Avatar
#8 thepeetso
September 01 2011, 11:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

Make the rink bigger.

They're still playing on the same size rink they did 50 years ago.

But now the players are on average 6 inches taller, 40 pounds heavier and twice as fast.

There is no space, no time to react and brace yourself. It's no wonder there is so many concussions.

You don't have to go to a European rink size but the time has come to enlarge the ice surface.

Avatar
#9 Quicksilver ballet
September 01 2011, 11:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

Hockey's fine just the way it is....so its been a rough summer, just carry on like nothing has happened and it'll blow over. This is why they get paid the big bucks.

The type of changes that need to be made could be a little on the drastic side. Change that could effectively kill the goose that lays the golden eggs for those whose who make a living inside the game of hockey. The powers that be won't dare risk what they've built up here. They just need someone to get killed in the next UFC fight and draw some of this attention away from the game of hockey.

Just be patient, nobody squawked when Eric Lindros was forced to leave the game, why should Crosby be any different.

Avatar
#10 Lego
September 01 2011, 12:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

@Quicksilver ballet

"Hockey's fine just the way it is....so its been a rough summer, just carry on like nothing has happened and it'll blow over. This is why they get paid the big bucks."

I really hate this argument. For every 1 guy that makes it to the NHL there are 1000 guys that play hockey at a high level and never make it to the big show and never make the big bucks. But they have the same rules and have to take the same risks.

If you can name 10 NHLers whose careers (and lives) were cut short off the top of your head then there must be hundreds of minor league players that have the same fate but we never hear about it. What about those guys?

The equipment needs to change, the player attitudes need to change. But most of all the culture needs to change and that starts with the fans.

Avatar
#11 Quicksilver ballet
September 01 2011, 12:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

@gongshow

The NHL is in the business of sporting entertainment. Any comparisons to Bub Slug working on a construction site is foolish.

If the players don't respect each other, all the rules in the world don't matter. The players are only doing what's expected of them. Intensity and finishing their check, for most, if they're not doing both they're not going anywhere in the game of pro hockey.

Avatar
#12 Archaeologuy
September 01 2011, 12:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

@Quicksilver ballet

To be fair, Robin listed 20. So I wouldnt go so far as to say it isnt an issue.

I wouldnt rewrite the rule book before I exhausted every equipment change under sun, but I wouldnt say there isnt a problem either.

Avatar
#13 mayorpoop
September 01 2011, 02:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props
Archaeologuy wrote:

You know why Olympic hockey is so good? Because there arent 30 teams and the best in the world are assembled.

...and it certainly doesn't hurt that there are stricter rules and different rules.

Avatar
#14 Wäx Män Riley
September 01 2011, 05:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

I don't want contact banned, but harsher penalties for dangerous hits could be seen. Or different equipment could be a start.

Avatar
#16 freeze
September 01 2011, 11:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

@Archaeologuy

Exactly! It's not like the shoulder caps are for protection from the puck! I'd also advocate removing the plastic cap from elbow pads too.

Avatar
#17 Jordan Nugent-Hallkins
September 01 2011, 11:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

About the suspension = injury time thing, a good point has been raised in the past: what happens when Stamkos or another big name goes to tip the shoulder on a third line plug, and the guy has his head down, takes it in the face, and goes down for several weeks? I agree that headshots need to be banned completely, but I don't think the length of recovery is a good stick by which to measure the suspension.

I think there needs to be an offense system. First offense - suspension and fine, second offense - double the first, third offense, season suspension maybe?

Avatar
#18 Ned Braden
September 01 2011, 11:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

@ Arch

Those products are already available and being forced into use in the OHL this year.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/hockey/ohl-institutes-soft-cap-pads-for-upcoming-season/article2149107/

The NHL has never been a leader in this field. Maybe with Shanny starting to get involved things will change. I remember when Shanny retired Cherry showed the shoulder pads he wore through out his career and compared them to the new ones the guys are wearing. Scary difference.

Avatar
#19 Tony
September 01 2011, 11:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

I am not certain what we are protecting here; while intentional hits to the head are being addressed we are now trying to remove any sort of accidental contact. Could you imagine if every sport/event changed the rules every time an injury occurred. Maybe NASCAR racing would have a speed limit of 50 mph due to the potential of injury during a high speed collision. There are certain risks that are understood by those that make a living playing professional sports at the highest levels.

Avatar
#20 Westcoastoil
September 01 2011, 12:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

As much as the league gets grief for doing nothing, and equal culprit here is the PA. Why are they not standing on a box holding up soft shoulders/elbow pads and pressuring the league to bring them in? The PA should also be pushing for stiffer suspensions, but they have always chosen to back the instigator and not the victim of an accident...who is also a PA member. The handful of games lost to suspension over the last 10 years is nothing compared to the number of games/careers lost to concussions.

The PA has taken no significant steps to work with the league to try and improve their own safety. It's about time they started being responsible and accountable for their inaction.

Avatar
#21 Vintage Flame
September 01 2011, 01:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Great article Robin. Even with the players you listed off, I'm sure there are more. A quick google search brought me to this page.

Concussions are a problem that are not a fad, or going away. They are getting worse by the year.

Is it an increasing lack of respect amongst the NHLPA members, or just the fact that the equipment is out-pacing the game.. who knows. Probably a little of both.

I like the OHL's decision to ban the hard cap shoulder and elbow pads, and I sincerely hope the NHL moves on this quickly, if not immediately.

Avatar
#22 Archaeologuy
September 01 2011, 01:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

@mayorpoop

On the topic of sport, I must disagree, but I dont feel conflicted watching violent collisions in sport. Some obviously dont feel the same way.

I think that rule changes should be the last resort. Something done after all other measures have been taken. I love the tradition of sport, so rule changes give me fits.

Avatar
#23 ChinookArch
September 01 2011, 01:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

The number of people advocating fighting in hockey and unnecessary hit's to the head here is surprising.

I like to watch hockey fights, but not at the expense of losing the flow of the game, which is what fighting does. I like to watch fast, hard hitting games, but limiting where and when hits can occur won't jeopardize the physicality of the hockey. There is no need reason for crushing unsuspecting players in vulnerable areas or targeting their heads. And after 30+ years of watching NHL hockey, I'm finally changing my position on fighting. Fighting needs to be eliminated.

Olympic hockey has consistently been the most entertaining brand of play, especially since NHL'rs were invited to play. It involves NO fighting and the violence (read cheap hits) are minimal compared to the NHL. The NHL game has changed, it will continue to change. I'm only one vote, and my vote does really count anyway - so cool your jets. That said, the day will come when my wish-list will come to be. I for one hope it will be sooner than later.

Avatar
#24 Archaeologuy
September 01 2011, 01:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

@ChinookArch

You know why Olympic hockey is so good? Because there arent 30 teams and the best in the world are assembled.

Avatar
#25 gongshow
September 01 2011, 01:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

The NHL is in the business of sporting entertainment. Any comparisons to Bub Slug working on a construction site is foolish.

If the players don't respect each other, all the rules in the world don't matter. The players are only doing what's expected of them. Intensity and finishing their check, for most, if they're not doing both they're not going anywhere in the game of pro hockey.

1) So persons employed by the 'sporting entertainment' industry should be treated differently than you or I in terms of safety. Every job carries with it some degree of inherent risk - hockey more than most. However, to ignore any opportunities to reduce the risk further just because it is 'sporting entertainment' is ridiculous.

By your logic, boxing should have stayed bare-knuckled and arena sports should still include lions, because that's what the fans want.

2) I agree with you that players are doing what's expected of them (intensity and finishing checks). That's what's especially great about playoff hockey.

However, respect or not, if you change the rules to outright ban headshots, you can still finish your check the same as always. How many times does a headshot occur in a season that doesn't look like it was intentional? Most head shots are dirty and they are predatory. Generally, you'll see a guy like Torres leave his feet or it's a predatory blind-side hit. Do you not believe that Raffi Torres isn't smart enough to land his hits on the shoulders or body of his opponents?

By making ALL headshots illegal, you're simply changing from a judgement call to an black or white (yes, the ref still must see the hit). No different than adding goal cameras or delay of game penalty for shooting over the boards.

Avatar
#26 Trevor
September 01 2011, 01:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

"Just be patient, nobody squawked when Eric Lindros was forced to leave the game, why should Crosby be any different."

There's a number of reasons. Top of the list is that understanding of concussions and their long term effects has grown in recent years.

Look up chronic traumatic encephalopathy. The effects usually don't manifest until after a player's career is over. Most of the work done on CTE has been focused in football and boxing, but Probert and Reggie Fleming both have been shown to have had CTE. As more pro athlete brains are donated to science, the better our understanding will be, but right now, repeated head trauma causes CTE, the effects of which are horrible.

The unfortunate thing about CTE is that it cannot be diagnosed until after the person affected with it has died.

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Helmets were once seen as being unnecessary and 'ruining the sport', yet now they are mandatory. Times change.

Avatar
#27 Zamboni Driver
September 01 2011, 02:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

We always said, "Does someone need to die before...?"

or

"Does a star have to go down?"

Well that's two for two.

The MSM now (finally) are coming around to this being a problem. Maybe now we can actually start talking about REALLY protecting players vs. worrying about the "Pussification" of hockey.

The macho b.s. that has been pervasive (and still is now when it comes to people defending the meaningless lunkheads and their pre-planned fights), maybe now is starting to change.

Avatar
#28 Archaeologuy
September 01 2011, 03:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
mayorpoop wrote:

...and it certainly doesn't hurt that there are stricter rules and different rules.

I would love to see a fight break out between Team Russia and Team Canada.

I dont see how those rules would help it at all in an 82 game season, but in the spirit of the Olympics I understand the rules.

Reduce the league to 12 teams like the Olympics and hold a draft. Watch the level of hockey increase exponentially. Taylor Hall will be lucky to play on the 2nd line in that scenario.

Strict rules dont help the Olympics, the fact that the teams are all star calibre and in a short tournament makes the Olympics incredible. The lack of physical play is just something we endure during that time.

Avatar
#29 rubbertrout
September 01 2011, 03:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

@ChinookArch

I really don't get why people throw out a 3 week tourney of the best of the best as an example of how NHL hockey should be.

We have an 82 game season. As sad as this may be, on a November Tuesday night game against Minnesota, half of the crowd only gets excited about a fight, a shootout or a huge hit. To compare the thrill of a short tournament of best on best with the everyday grind of the NHL season is a bit much. It doesn't make the normal fan seem that sophisticated but without a great TV deal the NHL is a gate driven league and keeping the people who fill the seats happy is a big part of the league's success or failure.

@ Archeologuy

I agree 100% on the equipment. I think changing the ice surface is a pipe dream and doubt that more ice space will make much of a difference. If they want to try this in the AHL to get some data to back it up I'm all for it.

Avatar
#30 Wäx Män Riley
September 01 2011, 03:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
Mason Storm wrote:

Good luck convincing 30 owners to pay to take away seats in their rinks. Especially places like New Jersey, where they just opened a multi-million dollar facility.

Mr. Pichette wrote:

Make the rink bigger. They're still playing on the same size rink they did 50 years ago. But now the players are on average 6 inches taller, 40 pounds heavier and twice as fast. There is no space, no time to react and brace yourself. It's no wonder there is so many concussions. You don't have to go to a European rink size but the time has come to enlarge the ice surface.

How about making the lines bigger? Change the blue lines and the center line from 1' to 3'. It increases the size of the playing surface (length anyway) without losing seats.

Avatar
#31 Quicksilver ballet
September 01 2011, 05:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Fireman die long before their time. Miners die long before their time. Some of our military die long before their time. What's wrong with the game of hockey giving its share as well.

The one constant that comes with living in the free world is that we're all guilty of the choices we've made. Hockey players are just people too.

Avatar
#32 Wäx Män Riley
September 01 2011, 06:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

And every hockey player accepted the risks for the sake of that contract. Nobody is forcing these kids to participate. Hockey players knowingly risk their lives for the sake of the standard of living it will afford them, nothing more.

Virtually all of the players on your list knowingly/willingly engaged in the most dangerous part of the game. For some, this may have been the reason they were fortunate enough to wear an NHL jersey in the first place.

I'm sympathetic towards the 3 families affected during this difficult summer but these are just isolated incidents that by coincidence happened within 3 months of each other. Contrary to popular belief, the sky isn't falling.

Considering this article was written by the president of the Rudy Poeschek fan club, thank you for another spirited effort Robin.

I think the argument is also about the price players have to pay for your entertainment.

If your son/daughter/cousin/nephew/friend was debilitated due to the carelessness happening during a fun game, wouldn't you want something done? Knowing that it more than likely could have been prevented? Or would you just look at that person and say "Tough Sh*t. you knew the risks, now walk it off!"

"But QSB, I can't feel my legs"

Avatar
#33 Quicksilver ballet
September 02 2011, 10:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

@Vintage Flame

3 guys died and many more will continue to perish as years go by, get used to it. We are all guilty of the choices we've made in life, how we depart this world is unique to every persons decision they've made. These guys as well as ourselves are fortunate that we even have the freedom to choose our own path.

It's easy to come around and hurl an insult and depart before backing it up. What can we expect from just another idiot from Calgary.

Please feel free to come by and throw another rock and run you little pansy.

Avatar
#34 Wäx Män Riley
September 02 2011, 12:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Well......

...On a lighter note, how about that Ebola virus?

Man, that sucked

Avatar
#35 ChinookArch
September 02 2011, 05:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

@rubbertrout

"How can you possibly compare a 3 week tournament of best on best that happens every 4 years with an 82 game season?"

For the sake of argument I granted you this point, let's move on.

I believe your right about fights being a draw to some fans of the game, and I'm sure some owners and organizations worry about loosing revenue if the NHL eliminated fighting. I think this is wrong- headed, it may have been a realty 20 years ago, maybe even 10 years ago, but do you really think that fans watch hockey for the fights. Why bother with so many good alternatives? If a guy needs to get a fight fix he can become an MMA fan. I just don't buy the idea that fighting is needed to draw fans anymore. The ON FN forum may not be scientific or even representative, but I bet not one person advocating fighting in the NHL would quite watching, if it was banned. I also believe that smaller skilled players would begin to become a common fixture in the league, adding to the overall skill level of all pro leagues, if we got rid of fighting.

Avatar
#36 ChinookArch
September 02 2011, 07:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

@Quicksilver ballet

What ever floats your boat.

Avatar
#37 Eulers
September 01 2011, 11:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Robin, thanks for your forceful stand!

I'd always thought bitterly that Crosby would have to go down for the NHL to get serious about concussions. Sadly, even this was insufficient.

Obviously, completely eliminating concussions from the game is impossible. However, I'm appalled that the league is not grabbing all the low-hanging fruit (headshots ban, softer equipment) it can.

My love for the game hangs in the balance here.

Avatar
#38 Ilya Byakin
September 01 2011, 11:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Concussions are devastating... As a junior B player, I had a couple and the headaches after wards were very tough to deal with... and that was in the jungle at much lower speed and less power.

I believe the NHL must do something about it. I would like to see the league put the players in cages, and make make mouth guards mandatory.

The league should also put some money into a study on how to improve helmets, elbow pads, and shoulder pads. They need to work with the companies that produce the equipment.

Farrell shoulder pads are a good example of pads that might reduce the impact of taking a shoulder to the head. The compression block technology should distribute some of the impact. Check out the image...

http://www.prohockeylife.com/hockey-shoulder-pads-senior-hockey-shoulder-pads-c-3_26_87/farrell-h600-sr-hockey-shoulder-pads-p-3439

Avatar
#39 madjam
September 01 2011, 11:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

A dangerous play rule would go a long way to lesson major injuries . Couple that with having offender suspended same amount of time it takes for for victim to get back - plus a little extra time for doing it in first place and you'll find players hitting in less vulnerable areas . Culture would change radically for the better if time they spent equalled or greater than victim !

Avatar
#40 Quicksilver ballet
September 01 2011, 11:55AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
thepeetso wrote:

Make the rink bigger.

They're still playing on the same size rink they did 50 years ago.

But now the players are on average 6 inches taller, 40 pounds heavier and twice as fast.

There is no space, no time to react and brace yourself. It's no wonder there is so many concussions.

You don't have to go to a European rink size but the time has come to enlarge the ice surface.

Well said Mr. Pichette.

Avatar
#41 gongshow
September 01 2011, 12:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The NFL understands that it has to protect it's assets from injury and has made some key rule changes that help to protect players without changing the game.

Why the NHL can't get it's $hit together and even make the small changes to protect the players/employees/assets is beyond me.

A small start would be to follow the OHL and mandate padded elbow and shoulder pads.

Also, I don't understand the rational as to why they can't make all head shots illegal. Who cares if it's a blindside hit or not.

Unless the player being hit ducks to avoid a hit (thus moving themselves into a vulnerable position), make it illegal to hit the head. Case closed. Penalty every time, with leeway to add suspensions for headshots coupled with charging etc.

Eliminating headshots would take nothing away from the game and protect the guys who play the game.

I've had at least good 4 concussions playing hockey and other sports, with the last two gimping me for extended periods of time. For all except the last one, neither myself nor the team staff knew enough to pull me from play and I might have missed a single shift at most. I would expect that my experience is not unlike many hockey players, but I look at guys like Lafontaine, Savard, Comrie etc and it's scary even when you don't consider the long term effects.

For anyone who stands behind the argument of 'well they get paid millions and if they don't like it, they can leave' - that's idiotic. How much you get paid is irrelevant. Outside of sports, any worksite that was not taking proper precautions to prevent injuries as serious as this would be shut down.

Along those same lines is the argument of 'why don't you just eliminate all contact and have a game for pussies and communists'. Sure, lets go back to the good old days where stick swinging was still part of the game. That was awesome and I can hardly stomach watching a game these days without witnessing a good 5 iron to the temple.

I am a lifelong hockey player,fan and now a hockey dad I have always enjoyed well-played, tough, old time hockey. However, it has taken watching my hockey addicted boys moving up in the sport to make me realize that something has to change.

Finally, I suppose that the crux of the matter for the NHL (and hockey in general) is that how do you penalize headshots from body contact, yet still allow headshots made by fists in hockey fights. I don't know how the leagues can rationalize this, but I certainly hope that they can find a way before we lose more players from the game.

Avatar
#42 gongshow
September 01 2011, 12:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ Dobolo

I agree whole heartedly on the NHLPA issue not taking any responsibility on the issue.

However while other leagues generally look to the NHL for guidance, it is shocking that no other leagues have made any changes (save for the OHL's announcement this week). Below the NHL, you can't expect the players to force the issue - be it at the junior level or otherwise.

Avatar
#43 Mason Storm
September 01 2011, 12:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
thepeetso wrote:

Make the rink bigger.

They're still playing on the same size rink they did 50 years ago.

But now the players are on average 6 inches taller, 40 pounds heavier and twice as fast.

There is no space, no time to react and brace yourself. It's no wonder there is so many concussions.

You don't have to go to a European rink size but the time has come to enlarge the ice surface.

Good luck convincing 30 owners to pay to take away seats in their rinks. Especially places like New Jersey, where they just opened a multi-million dollar facility.

Avatar
#44 Gerald R. Ford
September 01 2011, 12:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Archaeologuy

I suppose that the potential for the degree of severity per instance to increase is there. That's a definite possibility. Conversely, I believe that there exists a greater potential to decrease the NUMBER of collisions, overall. I guess it's like a highway. Sure, if you get smoked on the Henday, it'll be a lot worse than on a residential road (or, it SHOULD be, anyway). But, if you have enough lanes, they're wide enough, and you look out for the idiots, you should be OK, no matter what the speed.

The point is, ultimately, that making the rinks bigger seems to be a logical step in the right direction, and it's something that is definitely in the power of the owners to do. That is, if they want to put their money where their mouths are and step up for their employees, and sacrifice the revenue from those first few rows of seats. Plus, the upgrade costs involved to either make those seats available for other events, or remove them permanently.

Will it solve this problem by itself? Nope. But, it's worth a look. You just cannot keep having the players become exponentially bigger, faster, and stronger year after year after year, and have the ice surface area remain constant. It's irresponsibly negligent.

Avatar
#45 Quicksilver ballet
September 01 2011, 12:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Lego

I can't give you that list of 10 players whose career has been cut short because of concussions..... that is why it ISN'T a problem.

Avatar
#46 SportsDad
September 01 2011, 12:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

My son's minor hockey website has this video posted about the new head shot rule and what is allowed and what kind of penalty to expect when you do something wrong. I sat down with my son and explained how head shots are serious and there is nothing fun about ending a career and seriously hurting someone. I hope they enforce this rule, to me it looks pretty good. Starting the players thinking in minor hockey to be consious if head shots, intentional and incidental, will only help.

Here is the video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKHkeJTrRbQ&feature=youtu.be

Sorry, I am not sure how to link it, maybe a site guru can edit this to do it :)

Avatar
#47 pelhem grenville
September 01 2011, 12:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Q said..."If the players don't respect each other, all the rules in the world don't matter..."

this is the crux of the matter...

or bring back the redline...slow it all down

Avatar
#48 Quicksilver ballet
September 01 2011, 12:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Archaeologuy wrote:

To be fair, Robin listed 20. So I wouldnt go so far as to say it isnt an issue.

I wouldnt rewrite the rule book before I exhausted every equipment change under sun, but I wouldnt say there isnt a problem either.

You're right Archie, i failed to grasp that when i skimmed the article.

An expanded ice surface and reduced elbow and shoulder pads would make a world of difference without changing the rules.

Avatar
#49 mayorpoop
September 01 2011, 12:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
rahza Ghul wrote:

I've always been an advocate of violence in sports. The second these guys step on the ice they know the risks.

I was watching scott stevens hits yesterday...the ones on kozlov, adams would be considered illegal in today game which is BS.

These players will eventually get paid millions for shinny.

Tthe only wreckless actions that occur inthe league are how players are dealt with once they get off the ice. They claim that NHL is a business, well if thats the case the players are thier assets, take care of the assets off the ice and lets them do what they do best on the ice.

then why have any rules at all?

~i mean come on they know the risks and assume them when stepping on the ice.~

ignorance is bliss is it?

Avatar
#50 mayorpoop
September 01 2011, 12:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Hockey's fine just the way it is....so its been a rough summer, just carry on like nothing has happened and it'll blow over. This is why they get paid the big bucks.

The type of changes that need to be made could be a little on the drastic side. Change that could effectively kill the goose that lays the golden eggs for those whose who make a living inside the game of hockey. The powers that be won't dare risk what they've built up here. They just need someone to get killed in the next UFC fight and draw some of this attention away from the game of hockey.

Just be patient, nobody squawked when Eric Lindros was forced to leave the game, why should Crosby be any different.

hockey's not fine the way it is. if it was so perfect, why do we talk about he same things year after year as being problems/issues/concerns?

Comments are closed for this article.