THE PLAN: STAY THE COURSE

Robin Brownlee
February 14 2012 06:09PM

I'm not sure what Steve Tambellini's plan to rebuild the Edmonton Oilers involves exactly, aside from making lottery picks at the NHL Entry Draft year after year, but he reiterated again today that he's sticking with it. Whatever that, ahem, is.

With the NHL trade deadline looming Feb. 27 and the Oilers looking like a lottery lock for the third straight summer, there's no question Tambellini is going to get some calls from his peers around the league. You know, do-gooders looking to help him out by taking prospects and young players off his hands in exchange for help here and now. Sucker deals.

And while that might be tempting for a GM who critics suggest has shown little more than the ability to leave the tough calls to Stu MacGregor and build the Oilers into a fixture in 30th place, Tambellini didn't sound like a man desperate to do something to placate fans and save his own job 55 games into what has been a disappointing season. A season destined to fall short of expectations stated when it began.

In fact, Tambellini sounded very much like a man with a contract extension signed and sealed, if not yet officially delivered from owner Daryl Katz by way of public announcement. That, or Tambellini is completely oblivious to calls for his head by many fans, a sizeable segment of whom consider his jug largely devoid of ideas about how to properly build a team.

Sucker deals? You think Tambellini a rube?

RESIST TEMPTATION

Tambellini didn't deliver much in the way of surprises when he faced media gathered at Millennium Place today.

-- Of course Tambellini is trying to sign Ales Hemsky before he gets to free agency July 1. And while Tambellini wouldn't discuss details, it goes without saying he'll do everything possible get a contract done. As long as "everything possible " doesn't involve more than offering a two-year deal when he knows Hemsky will bolt if a doesn't get a long-term pact, say four or five years – my words, not his. That writing is on the wall.

-- Tambellini says he isn't looking to move Ryan Smyth as a rental to a contender. No need for another tearful scene at the airport. Besides, Smyth has a no-move clause and he didn't orchestrate a trade back to Edmonton "for family" reasons last summer only to look like a liar-liar-pants-on-fire guy by playing the opportunity card now and then returning next fall.

-- Might Tambellini trade Nikolai Khabibulin and give Devan Dubnyk the run of the goal crease? Sure, he might, but to hear him tell it, that's unlikely. Unless, of course, there's something that makes sense in the long term, which was pretty much the theme of Tambellini's answers today. He is, if nothing else, consistent.

The scrum with Tambellini had pretty much broken up as the pack shifted to corner Hemsky and ask him how badly he wants to remain a member of the Oilers – my take is the ONLY chance he'll stay is if Tamby has a stroke and offers a contract that runs through 2017 or so – when I asked about the sucker deals and if he'll give into temptation.

THE BIG PICTURE

"Is it hard? Yes, at times it is hard," Tambellini said when I asked him about taking shortcuts to contention. "But the courage to stick with the plan is organizational wide.

"We know where we're going. We know what we have. We know all the good things that are happening within the organization from our drafting to Oklahoma City, where we're in first place, to this team.

"Maybe we don't have the results that we wanted, but we know the team is better. We look at the elite talent that is here. This team went from the bottom of the league in special teams to, I think, what are we, second or third in the league in power play? That's telling me there's elite skill and a mind that can think at that level here.

"Our penalty killing. I think that was toward the very bottom of the league, too. I believe we're 11th or 12th right now. There's a commitment to defense and sacrifice. We know there are good things happening. We don't see the results yet, but I know the direction we're going in. We'll be successful."

So, no goofball, big-splash stuff – Rick Nash comes to mind -- to impress the guy who signs the cheques or to toss the fans a bone? No giving into the whispering of sweet-nothings by other GMs in the next 14 days?

"I know I'll get the calls," Tambellini said. "How, by moving some of our young players, it's going to help me get better, somehow, but I think you have to be aware of that."

See? Everything is fine. Right on schedule. Stay the course.

Listen to Robin Brownlee Wednesdays and Thursdays from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. on the Jason Gregor Show on TEAM 1260.

Aceb4a1816f5fa09879a023b07d1a9b4
A sportswriter since 1983, Brownlee covered the Oilers for The Journal and The Sun from 1989 to 2007. These days, he writes for the Canadian Press and Oilersnation and co-hosts the Jason Gregor Show on TEAM 1260 twice a week. Most important, he is Sam's dad. You can follow me on Twitter at @Robin_Brownlee.
Avatar
Reply #51 Pucker February 15 2012, 12:58PM
+1 0 props
mayorpoop wrote:

the best thing the Oilers organization has going for them is the fan base. the worst thing the Oilers organization has going for them is their complete disregard for that fan base.

i, for one, do not need to be made aware of every deal behind the doors or the specifics of contract/trade talks. what i would like is some truth. i would enjoy the PR to be honest to a smart, if not critical, fan base. all (aside from the odd troll) memebers of Oilers Nation deserve not excuses or empty promises but a glimpse of hope. WE buy the tickets for the games, WE spend the money on over priced food/drink at games, WE buy the merchandise and wear it proudly, and WE teach our kids that no other hockey teams matter. Oilers and nothing else.

stop telling me what you are going to do and show me that you are doing it.

I agree.

Last lock out when Hamilton Bulldoges moved here, the Oiler's assured us it would be for the long term. I didn't believe this and it still upsets me that I was correct. . Tambellini - twice in the past two years, telling us how good the Oiler's will be in the near future. Both times a fail. . It's discouraging the organization can continue to lie to its customers and get away with no repurcussions. I guess with a monopoly, maintaining respect within Edmonton/Alberta is not part of their agenda.

Avatar
Reply #52 Team Hall February 15 2012, 01:20PM
+1 0 props

Stay the course. Year 3 of the rebuild and already we are turning the boat around? Come on people. We are almost there. Don't give up now. Draft, draft draft, develop, tweak and voila. We are the LA Kings. Minus a brutal Penner deal.

Avatar
Reply #53 Lochenzo February 15 2012, 01:34PM
+1 0 props

Yes, no short cuts. I've heard some suggestion that the Oil dangle their lottery pick this year to grab a Dman. I say no to that plan. We will get a very talented, young player with that pick that will be with us for many years.

The Leafs kinda remind me of the quick fix years that the Oilers went through. Lots of expensive contracts, gave up some picks to make it happen. The Oil were right up against the cap yet were a bubble playoff team at best. Not unlike the Leafs this year. Can the Leafs win the Cup with this current plan? A small maybe, that keeps getting smaller with each passing year.

I saw this year as our last chance to nab a top 10 pick for a while. Keep this pick, but the pressure is on for this team to take a big step next year.

Avatar
Reply #54 Love Monkey February 15 2012, 01:54PM
+1 0 props
Clarkenstein wrote:

Steve... nobody gives a rats a$$ that your AHL team is in first place. Nice, but not important in the big picture. This guy AND his goofy boss Klowe couldn't find their own ar$ehole with both hands and fish hooks!!

Actually, the success of the farm team is very much related to the Oilers’ eventual success. Last year’s Binghamton Senators won the Calder Cup and many of those players are part of Ottawa’s resurgence this season. The two previous years, and 3 out of the previous 5 Calders were won by the Hershey Bears (they also lost in the finals in the middle too) and while Washington hasn’t translated it into a Stanley Cup, they’ve been dominant for a few years now with talented players they graduated, not to mention Bruce Boudreau. What about the Chicago Wolves who won the Calder in 2008? Many of those same players took the Canucks to Game 7 last year. Or the Hamilton Bulldogs of 2007? The habs, despite losing in the first round, were the top team in the East the following year. And lots of those guys were key in the Habs’ run to the third round a couple years ago. And they were looking ok last year in the playoffs too up 2-0 over Boston heading back to Montreal. Of course the Bruins went on to win the series and the Cup but the point is that elite farm teams tend to result in, at a minimum, decent-to-excellent regular season runs and quite often playoff success. I’ll take “great regular season with a chance of playoff glory” over crappy farm system with no internally developed talent.

Avatar
Reply #55 RexLibris February 15 2012, 03:22PM
+1 0 props

@Love Monkey

Well said. Anyone who doesn't draw a connection between the success of a farm team (you know, that place where your draft picks play to develop their game) and the success of the parent club should take a good look at the impact Darryl Sutter's moves have had on the Flames. Or perhaps, given our opponent this evening, a closer look at the recent success, or lack thereof, of the Toronto Marlies and the impact that has had on the Leafs.

Buying talent was tried. It failed. Trading for talent only works if you have something people want (something many Flames fans who suggest Stajan should be included in a deal for Nash haven't yet grasped). So, what's left? Build your own stars! What a novel idea!

Tambellini and Lowe have more success on their resume than many GMs out there right now. It hasn't worked out well in the past six years and many mistakes have been made and thankfully some have been avoided (Nylander and Vanek), but there is perhaps, just perhaps, a reason these guys got their jobs in the first place.

Besides, if GM-ing a team were easy, Mike Milbury would still be doing it.

Comments are closed for this article.