Anthony Stewart, Andrew Murray and Zach Hamill on Waivers Today

Jonathan Willis
February 06 2012 11:27AM

As per Bob McKenzie, a trio of players with NHL experience are on the waiver wire today. Are any of them particularly interesting?

Anthony Stewart, Carolina Hurricanes

The Hurricanes picked up Stewart for a song this summer, signing the former first round pick to a two-year, $900,000 per year deal. The now 27-year old was originally drafted 25th overall by Florida in 2003, and was coming off a career-best 14-goal, 39-point season with the defunct Atlanta Thrashers. Why was a 6’2” former first-round pick coming off the best season of his career available so cheaply? Why is he available now?

A lot of it has to do with Stewart’s track record. Here are his point totals over the last five seasons:

  • 2006-07: 62 games, 27 points (AHL)
  • 2007-08: 54 games, 31 points (AHL)
  • 2008-09: 59 games, seven points (NHL)
  • 2009-10: 77 games, 31 points (AHL)
  • 2010-11: 80 games, 39 points (NHL)

As a rule, 30-point guys in the AHL don’t suddenly turn into 30-point guys in the NHL. Carolina’s seen that this year – Stewart has 13 points in 50 games played. He’s a guy without the hands to play on a skill line, and he doesn’t have the defensive chops to make it in a checking role (this year, for example, he’s playing a ton of offensive minutes, typically against bad players and is getting outshot worse than almost anyone else on the Hurricanes’ roster). The scoring chances paint an even bleaker picture than the shot clock does.

Stewart’s available now because for the bulk of his professional career he’s shown himself to be an AHL-calibre player. He’s played to that level this season, and that’s probably why Carolina’s sending him down.

Zach Hamill, Boston Bruins

Zach Hamill (no relation) isn’t just any prospect – he was the eighth overall pick in 2007. Unfortunately, he’s basically been backpedalling since his draft year. When the Bruins selected Hamill, he was fresh off a 93-point season in 69 games in the WHL. The next year he barely crossed the point-per-game threshold in the same league, and so it wasn’t a big shock when he managed less than 30 points as a rookie in the AHL.

Hamill’s now in his fourth full professional season. After a relatively strong year for an offensively inept Providence Bruins team in 2010-11, he earned his most protracted NHL stint to date this season – 16 games. During that span, the playmaker has picked up just two assists.

Hamill’s the kind of guy that might yet be able to carve out a role in the NHL for himself, if he can get the scoring to come. It’s a long-shot to be sure, in no small part because despite a strong play-making game Hamill isn’t a shooter – he’s a career 10% guy in the AHL over chunks of four season, and doesn’t fire the puck a lot. He has real playmaking skill, but he needs an extended audition on a team desperate for the help. Additionally, skating has been a major concern going back to draft day – for a smallish offensive guy, Hamill’s just not as fast as he probably needs to be.

There are definite things to like about the player – his play-making, his vision, even his positional smarts at both ends of the ice – but most undersized offensive players without a threatening shot or much speed struggle to translate their offense from the AHL to the NHL. When that AHL-level offense hasn’t been especially good (and in Hamill’s case, it hasn’t), the odds of a lengthy career in the NHL dwindle.

Andrew Murray, San Jose Sharks

While the two guys who went in the first round will get most of the attention, Andrew Murray might be the best of the three on waivers today. If the guy had any scoring talent at all…

That’s been Murray’s issue, going back to his first season as a professional. Murray turned 24 early in his rookie pro season, having just come out of the U.S. college system, and spent two and a half years polishing his game in the AHL before making the jump to the majors, where he’s been for the last 200+ games of his career.

Murray’s big, he can kill penalties, he’s passable on the faceoff circle, he plays the game with an edge, he’s rarely at fault defensively, and he’s basically everything a team could ask for on their fourth line. Not only does Murray hit relentlessly, but he’s one of the most disciplined energy players in the game – in a 220 game NHL career, he has just 36 PIMs. Again, however: if only he could score.  Murray put up 29 points in the AHL as a rookie pro and that number remains his personal best.

Murray spent most of his Blue Jackets’ career as a defensive zone specialist (when he was in the lineup – everywhere he’s gone he’s been an end-of-roster kind of guy) and for that reason it wouldn’t surprise me if he ends up in Vancouver; he just looks like a perfect fit for their fourth line and his lack of offense and relatively low profile might allow him to sneak by other teams. He’s a useful NHL’er right now, in a specialized role, and that’s not something one can say about a lot of guys with scoring totals that low.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 Eulers
February 06 2012, 11:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Oil's response should be: Pass, Pass, Pass.

Here's hoping we can beat the Leafs tonight, so I can give my sister a hard time. It's a family embarrassment that she's a Leafs fan, but then most of them are Flames fans.

Also, FIST.

Avatar
#2 bookofloob
February 06 2012, 11:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I initially thought it was DOUGLAS Murray, and I was all "whoa" about it

Avatar
#3 misfit
February 06 2012, 11:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Considering "being a 1st round pick" seems to be the first thing this Oilers management team looks for when aquiring a player regardless of how long ago or what he's done since, I wouldn't be surprised to see either Hamil or Stewart picked up. Not that we need either player.

Stewart has size as well, so he's got to be close to a lock, I'd think.

Avatar
#4 Mike Krushelnyski
February 06 2012, 11:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Murray or Hamill might be interesting at 4C. It would finally let us send Lander down to OKC for some big time minutes and to help solidify the glorious Calder Cup run!

Avatar
#6 TonyT
February 06 2012, 12:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I'd be interested in Stewart if only for his size.

Avatar
#7 Graham
February 06 2012, 12:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Hamill might be worth a gamble, but then again, the Flames have a number of smaller centers and are pretty much at the 50 contract limit.

T

Avatar
#8 oilbaron
February 06 2012, 12:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

id take hamill, still has allot of upside.

the kid only has 20 games of nhl experience. He only has 4 points but he is a +5

Avatar
#9 justDOit
February 06 2012, 12:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@TonyT

Why not keep JFJ then?

Avatar
#10 wawful
February 06 2012, 01:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Stewart - He's signed on a one-way contract through to the end of next season. He's just not worth the cap hit if all he's going to do is add depth to somebody's farm team. He'll probably go unclaimed.

Hamill - Two-way contract that's up at the end of the season. He's young enough that he could still have some upside and there's absolutely no risk to picking him up. Pretty much the only decision to make is whether or not you can afford to bench somebody in order to give this guy a cup of coffee and see if new surroundings spark anything. Hamill is the most likely of these three to be picked up in my books. He's a good free roll of the dice.

Murray - Two-way contract that expires this season. He's a what you see is what you get sort of player. I'd say he has good odds of being picked up by a team looking for some cheap playoff depth, but he's not a potential steal like Hamill could be.

Avatar
#11 John Lofranco
February 06 2012, 02:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I remember watching Stewart play as a midget, ironically with the North York Canadiens. He was always a presence. But I suppose that anyone who makes it to the NHL had to have been a presence in his midget year.

What the heck happened to Hamill? Does a change of scenery help him?

I don't really see the Leafs getting in on any of these guys, but I am interested to see what happens: is it the end of the line, or a fresh start?

Avatar
#13 Time Travelling Sean
February 06 2012, 08:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Mike Krushelnyski wrote:

Murray or Hamill might be interesting at 4C. It would finally let us send Lander down to OKC for some big time minutes and to help solidify the glorious Calder Cup run!

O'Marra.

Comments are closed for this article.