Would You Take Dustin Penner Back?

Jonathan Willis
March 06 2012 10:17AM

Dustin Penner is having a horrible season with the Los Angeles Kings. Five goals and 13 points in 48 games isn’t the sort of production Dean Lombardi expected when he traded for him, and it isn’t going to earn Penner – in the final year of his contract – good dollars next season.

Should the Oilers try to sign him to a bargain contract?

Penner’s best season came during 2009-10, a trainwreck of a year for virtually everybody on the Oilers. With Ales Hemsky and Nikolai Khabibulin hurt, AHL-calibre ‘tenders in net and Ryan Potulny on the second line, there was a shortage of good news on the team. Dustin Penner’s 32 goals led the Oilers by a mile (nobody else got 20), as did his 63 points (Sam Gagner, with 41, was the only other player with more than 40), and he had a pretty good follow-up season before getting moved to Los Angeles.

There are some other positives. Penner’s still relatively young; he’s not yet 30. He’s a career 12.6% shooter, shooting at a 5.7% clip this year – in other words, his goal-scoring is likely to rebound. Additionally, issues in his personal life have been made public, issues that might have some bearing on his terrible season. That gives some reason to believe he could rebound next season.

On the other hand, a lot of fans didn’t like Penner even when he was the best offensive player in the lineup. Work ethic has always been something that fans and management have identified as an issue – he was Randy Carlyle’s whipping boy in Anaheim, Craig MacTavish had him on a special exercise regimen in Edmonton, and when Dean Lombardi wasn’t criticizing Jack Johnson he found time to toss Penner under the bus too.

Is the risk of getting an impact player on the cheap worthwhile? Or did you see enough the first time around?

Related Articles

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is Managing Editor of the Nation Network. He also currently writes for the Edmonton Journal's Cult of Hockey, Grantland, and Hockey Prospectus. His work has appeared at theScore, ESPN and Puck Daddy. He was previously founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue. Contact him at jonathan (dot) willis (at) live (dot) ca.
Avatar
#51 mayorpoop
March 06 2012, 11:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

for real this topic is insanity.

Avatar
#52 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
March 06 2012, 11:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
mayorpoop wrote:

for real this topic is insanity.

Insanity is turning your nos up to a quality defensive player with a resonable shot at 20+ goals and 40+ points when you can get him for dirt cheap.

Avatar
#53 book¡e
March 06 2012, 12:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Maybe - I would want to know more about his impact on dressing room chemistry. If he is not particularly disruptive, then I would be happy to sign him.

He could start next year with a clean slate and something to prove. If he is cheap enough, then its not a big deal if he finds himself on the third line for most of the year.

I liked the Penner trade at the time, but I also really like Dustin Penner as a hockey player.

Avatar
#54 TrentonL
March 06 2012, 12:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Penner has been a victim of three things during his time in LA:

1) SH% - 5.5% in LA vs. 12.6% career 2) PDO - .975 on a low on ice sh% of 5.08 3) Tossed in the coach's doghouse because he is big and doesn't look like he is trying.

As far as I am concerned I'd rather take Penner who is effective but having bad luck and has a style people don't like over a Jones who looks like he is doing stuff while falling all over the ice but "tries hard" so he is a fan favorite.

Cue the Jones fanboys who fail to realize that he will score at or less than 20g/35p this year marking his career high vs. Penner who topped out at 32g/63p.

Avatar
#55 mayorpoop
March 06 2012, 12:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F

your definition of reasonable is from 2yrs ago and better. why not go after Cheechoo he got 50 once. or how about Blake he got 40 once.

quality defensive? really? how is his year this year. remember when we all complained he was soft? or lazy? or slow?

let's move on from the recycle mode.

jeez already let's make like a grown up team and make decisions to win.

Avatar
#56 Dman09
March 06 2012, 12:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
TrentonL wrote:

Penner has been a victim of three things during his time in LA:

1) SH% - 5.5% in LA vs. 12.6% career 2) PDO - .975 on a low on ice sh% of 5.08 3) Tossed in the coach's doghouse because he is big and doesn't look like he is trying.

As far as I am concerned I'd rather take Penner who is effective but having bad luck and has a style people don't like over a Jones who looks like he is doing stuff while falling all over the ice but "tries hard" so he is a fan favorite.

Cue the Jones fanboys who fail to realize that he will score at or less than 20g/35p this year marking his career high vs. Penner who topped out at 32g/63p.

agreed, I laughed at the whole Hartnell falls thing because in reality Jones would put him out of business in that stat.

Avatar
#57 Robin Brownlee
March 06 2012, 12:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

"Penner has been a victim . . ."

Poor Dustin Penner. Again.

Avatar
#58 Dman09
March 06 2012, 12:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Aunt Jemima wrote:

I WOULD TAKE PENNERCAKES OVER PRV ALL DAY ER DAY CAN'T STOP WON'T STOP

Why does everyone think that PRV is that good and deserving to be an oiler? If he's really that good should he be killing it in ahl? It's time to wake up and smell the winterbreeze.

I'm a big PRV fan and I do think he will be a good NHL player some day but as of right now he has not earned a place on the team and it shouln't be handed to him. Players need to earn their NHL time esecially with the amount of money they make.

Avatar
#59 Pucker
March 06 2012, 12:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Sign him to a reasonable contract then trade him for a first round draft pick.

. . . someone will sign him for an overpay potential based contract. Pass.

Avatar
#60 Dyckster
March 06 2012, 12:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Robin Brownlee wrote:

“He’s at the crossroads of his career. He can choose with his athletic ability to be one of the dominant power forwards in the National Hockey League or he can be a dominant number four hitter for the El Cid Lounge in a men’s softball league.”

--Dean Lombardi on Penner

Penner still hasn't figured it out. And you can probably plug in a dozen names of coaches and teammates who've echoed the same sentiment about Penner over the past 5-7 years.

Please, enough with excuses why Penner is having such a terrible season with the Kings. Was his marriage on the rocks two years ago? Three? How about when he was single? And poor Penner, when he first got to Edmonton he was still tired from a short summer after a Stanley Cup run with Anaheim. You can't expect a guy to earn his salary after that. Mac-T was mean to him. The dog ate his homework. What is this, Enablers Anonymous? Please, move on.

Besides, the El Cid Lounge will want draft picks for his rights.

~Soooooo you think The Oil should give it a shot then, Robin?~

Avatar
#61 TrentonL
March 06 2012, 12:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
mayorpoop wrote:

your definition of reasonable is from 2yrs ago and better. why not go after Cheechoo he got 50 once. or how about Blake he got 40 once.

quality defensive? really? how is his year this year. remember when we all complained he was soft? or lazy? or slow?

let's move on from the recycle mode.

jeez already let's make like a grown up team and make decisions to win.

You don't think he is quality defensively? Why not? With Penner on the ice SF/SA is 29.2/24.7 with Penner off the ice the Kings are at 27.8/25.1.

So they shoot more at the opponents net and take fewer shots against when he is on the ice. Sounds like a bad defensive/lazy player to me.

Yeah he is soft...in the 4 seasons he played for Edmonton he ranked 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 4th in hits by forwards....you are right.

Avatar
#62 Fresh Mess
March 06 2012, 12:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

The Oilers are incapable of giving out Value contracts.

A value contract for Penner would be a 2 way 1 million NHL/ 150 grand AHL deal.

Lowe/Tambo would probably give him 4 million per, and exclaim to the media that he took a pay cut to come back here.

Avatar
#63 Dman09
March 06 2012, 12:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
TrentonL wrote:

You don't think he is quality defensively? Why not? With Penner on the ice SF/SA is 29.2/24.7 with Penner off the ice the Kings are at 27.8/25.1.

So they shoot more at the opponents net and take fewer shots against when he is on the ice. Sounds like a bad defensive/lazy player to me.

Yeah he is soft...in the 4 seasons he played for Edmonton he ranked 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 4th in hits by forwards....you are right.

I've always viewed hitting on a team as contagious, when people start hitting the majority of the team starts to follow. Also with Penner, you know what you're signing. If you want a guy that can physically take over a game then look else where but if you want a guy that can consistently move the puck up the ice and usually put up approx 50 point seasons then go for him. MPS doesn't hit guys either but you don't see people ragging on him the way Penner gets ragged on.

Avatar
#64 mayorpoop
March 06 2012, 12:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@TrentonL

such a marginal shots per game doesn't change my mind. we didn't get enough from here when we had him and we were quick to crucify him at that time.

i just don't get it.

Avatar
#65 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
March 06 2012, 12:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
mayorpoop wrote:

your definition of reasonable is from 2yrs ago and better. why not go after Cheechoo he got 50 once. or how about Blake he got 40 once.

quality defensive? really? how is his year this year. remember when we all complained he was soft? or lazy? or slow?

let's move on from the recycle mode.

jeez already let's make like a grown up team and make decisions to win.

He needs to hit 20 this year to think it's resonable he hits 20 next year?

Ridiculous

Soft/lazy/slow doesn't mean poor defensively

This is a decision to win, using a prospect in that spot instead would be a decision to lose.

Avatar
#66 Bryzarro World
March 06 2012, 12:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

PENNERCAKES!!!!!

Avatar
#67 Bryzarro World
March 06 2012, 12:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Or Pencakes!!

Avatar
#68 Oiler AL
March 06 2012, 12:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Tabilini's best ever deal was moving Penner to L.A. Penner is a big lazy, over weight slug. He could not keep up with the young guys on this team, his back checking is non exsistant, and he shows up every 8 games or so. This guy can hardly complete one shift, out of air making run for the players bench ASAP. He most always was slow and late on the play, arriving Tuesday afternoon [ on a Sunday game ].Yes he had 30 goals, most of his goals were on the PP, where he would park is wide butt and wait for pucks to bounce off his body. That what we have Smyth for. Can't believe all these posters wanting him back, makes me wonder what and how you watch games. You can bet.. L A wont be signing him He will be in the Manitoba Beer League next year , where he belongss

Avatar
#69 DieHard
March 06 2012, 12:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I give it my blessing. ST , you may sign him. 1 year tryout (2M). Third line to start and may go up or down depending on his mood.

Avatar
#70 rindog
March 06 2012, 12:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Oiler AL wrote:

Tabilini's best ever deal was moving Penner to L.A. Penner is a big lazy, over weight slug. He could not keep up with the young guys on this team, his back checking is non exsistant, and he shows up every 8 games or so. This guy can hardly complete one shift, out of air making run for the players bench ASAP. He most always was slow and late on the play, arriving Tuesday afternoon [ on a Sunday game ].Yes he had 30 goals, most of his goals were on the PP, where he would park is wide butt and wait for pucks to bounce off his body. That what we have Smyth for. Can't believe all these posters wanting him back, makes me wonder what and how you watch games. You can bet.. L A wont be signing him He will be in the Manitoba Beer League next year , where he belongss

So we have resorted to criticizing the types of goals players score?

30 goals are 30 goals...

If he could be signed to $1.5 per season or less, I would support it.

Avatar
#71 Oilers21
March 06 2012, 12:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I advocated keeping him before he was traded, so I'd take him back on a value contract. His 2008/9 season was terrible but his 2009/10 season was a real bright spot for us; pretty comparable to a typical Rick Nash season, who everyone views as a massive superstar despite never breaking the 80-point mark, and only breaking 70 once. Look, I'm not saying the 2 players are equal, and obviously consistency is an issue for Penner, but if Nash is worth 7.5 million (his LOWEST salary until 2018!) and we can sign Penner for around $2 million/year, then I would say that's value for sure.

Avatar
#72 mayorpoop
March 06 2012, 01:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F

for some unknown reason i am going to humour this conversation.

who do you replace him with?

for how long do you sign him? is he a vital part of your re-build? is Lomabardi dumb enough to trade for him twice?

what does he bring today that we need? what does he bring next year that we need?

AND for my part i already think we are making decision to lose and Penner has no part in that. poooooor management does.

Avatar
#73 Wll Colford
March 06 2012, 01:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I think his production numbers were fine for how much money we gave him. But watching him play was so frustrating. He just kind of glides around, doesn't back check worse than Hemskey, and just looks like he doesn't care. Now we have Smyth who I'd have on the roster over and above Penner any day of the week. Plus with Eager and Jones, we have bigger guys that play with some energy and heart.

Avatar
#74 rindog
March 06 2012, 01:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Archaeologuy wrote:

My only question would be where to place him. If the Oilers draft a forward this year then we're all out of top 6 spots and I think Smyth gets the 3LW spot. And that ignores the possibility of actually playing Paajarvi in the NHL.

Draft a defenseman and I'd be open to the idea on a short and uber cheap deal.

I liked Penner, but spending 1 minute talking to Penner's agent on July 1 means 1 minute away from a defenseman's agent.

No forward drafted, defense taken care of, and on the cheap I'd do it.

I am thinking that Penner would slot in perfectly as a 3rd line winger (R or L) if he came cheap.

4-93-14 91-Grig-83 94-20-27 55-10-28 (until we can bury Horcoff somewhere and move lander to 3C and Belanger down to 4C)

Gagner and Omark (if he is worth anything) could be used (along with a draft pick/prospect) to acquire a top 2 defender (this mught be wishful thinking on my part?).

6-new D 5-15 25-58/44/24

Is that a horrible roster?

Avatar
#75 Evilas
March 06 2012, 01:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Penner RNH Eberle, Hall xx Hemsky (or Hartikainen and move Hall to C), Omark Lander PRV, Smyth Horcoff Eager

Gagner, Belanger, Jones included in deals for a top D-man/goalie

If you can sign Penner to a max $1.75/yr over 2 yrs.

This gives everyline size and therefore more room for the skilled guys and someone to knock in rebounds.

Avatar
#76 Zamboni Driver
March 06 2012, 01:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I was going to say "no offense", but everyone knows what that prefaces...

This is the single most moronic suggestion ever hatched.

Penner is going to be off spending his money in Ontario somewhere, nowhere near the NHL.

People in this City need to start giving their heads a collective shake.

There are...in fact....OTHER HOCKEY PLAYERS IN THE WORLD not just those who used to play here.

Avatar
#77 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
March 06 2012, 01:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
mayorpoop wrote:

for some unknown reason i am going to humour this conversation.

who do you replace him with?

for how long do you sign him? is he a vital part of your re-build? is Lomabardi dumb enough to trade for him twice?

what does he bring today that we need? what does he bring next year that we need?

AND for my part i already think we are making decision to lose and Penner has no part in that. poooooor management does.

Are you asking who he replaces?

I count 3 wingers that are hands down better then Penner, 1 that is probably better and 1 that you could maybe make a case for.... so I don't think finding a spot for him would be too hard.

I'd sign him for prefferably 1 year, 2 years max.

What does he bring that we need? goals and solid defensive play....pretty simple answer.

Avatar
#78 edmonton Sux
March 06 2012, 01:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Why would he come back to your craptacular city ? Hilarious everybody here assumes its up to the oilers if they want him back. hahah.... last i remember free agent love to sign there ... errr wait.. have fun finishing last again.

Go Nucks !

Avatar
#79 mayorpoop
March 06 2012, 01:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Zamboni Driver wrote:

I was going to say "no offense", but everyone knows what that prefaces...

This is the single most moronic suggestion ever hatched.

Penner is going to be off spending his money in Ontario somewhere, nowhere near the NHL.

People in this City need to start giving their heads a collective shake.

There are...in fact....OTHER HOCKEY PLAYERS IN THE WORLD not just those who used to play here.

^^^THIS.

Avatar
#80 mayorpoop
March 06 2012, 01:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F

yes goals. sure. you count 3 wingers but don't name any and what do we get for them and can we get rid of them?

he is neither a true bottom six player (see slow, lazy, soft) nor is he a true top six player (see also slow, lazy, soft).

yes we need more middling players.

i'm stunned by the defence of this idea. stunned.

Avatar
#81 mayorpoop
March 06 2012, 01:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@mayorpoop

sorry just want to make sure you understand there was direct implied sarcasm when i said the word GOALS and SURE.

Avatar
#82 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
March 06 2012, 01:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
mayorpoop wrote:

yes goals. sure. you count 3 wingers but don't name any and what do we get for them and can we get rid of them?

he is neither a true bottom six player (see slow, lazy, soft) nor is he a true top six player (see also slow, lazy, soft).

yes we need more middling players.

i'm stunned by the defence of this idea. stunned.

What on earth are you talking about? It's like your posts are in code.

We've got 3 wingers better then Penner, 5 at most.

That means we've got 3-5 wingers that are worse then Penner.

Replace the inferior players with a superior player.

Pretty simple way to improve your team.

Avatar
#83 edmonton Sux
March 06 2012, 01:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

haha oil fan, or should I say Islanders west, do anything relevant last 5 yrs ?

Avatar
#84 TrentonL
March 06 2012, 01:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Oiler AL

Not sure what your definition of most is, but in his 32 goal season only 9 were on the PP. In his career 45g of 133g have been on the PP....also not most.

By comparison, Jordan Eberle this season so far has 29 goals, 9 of which have been scored on the PP. Hall has 12/23 on the PP. Guess we don't need those guys either because we have Smyth.

Avatar
#85 edmonton Sux
March 06 2012, 01:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Right so in other words nothing, polishing cups ? referring to your job at jersey city in West Ed I assume, its were most of you oil fans are employed right ?

Avatar
#86 mayorpoop
March 06 2012, 02:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F

you say "code" i say plain english.

who are the wingers? name them and tell me how we get rid of them and their contracts.

Avatar
#87 Muji 狗
March 06 2012, 02:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I like Penner. He's a funny guy. He handles the haterz with grace and humour (tho handling it with improved play would be better..).

For his sake, it'd be cool if the Ducks signed him on the cheap, reunited him with Getzlaf and Perry, and rejuvenated his career.

Avatar
#88 Marshall Law
March 06 2012, 02:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

If he's dirt cheap and available, it would be nuts not to bring him back. There would be zero risk to signing him to a one year deal. His teammates love him and he would bring size to the top 6 (or 9, I guess). Oiler fans love to hate on him but there wasn't a more productive guy on the team during his tenure in Edmonton. He doesn't fit in LA. He's had reasonable success in Edmonton.

Avatar
#89 Jason
March 06 2012, 02:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

It all comes down to the cost for me. If the price is right, then I think Penner could fit.

Hall / Nugent-Hopkins / Eberle

Paajarvi / Gagner / Hemsky

Smyth / Horcoff / Penner

Eager / Lander / Jones

... Or something along those lines. Paajarvi and Penner could likely be swapped back and forth too since both of them have had experience playing both RW and LW.

He brings a different element to the lineup than Linus Omark would. And he has shown he has the ability to score goals. If he was willing to sign for somewhere in the 2.0 - 2.5 million per season for a couple of years, I think I'd strongly consider it.

Avatar
#90 The Beaker
March 06 2012, 02:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
edmonton Sux wrote:

Right so in other words nothing, polishing cups ? referring to your job at jersey city in West Ed I assume, its were most of you oil fans are employed right ?

Would you rather help your Uncle Jack off a horse or help your uncle jack off a horse?

betchu wish ye remembard grmmar frum skool ehh?

Avatar
#91 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
March 06 2012, 02:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
mayorpoop wrote:

you say "code" i say plain english.

who are the wingers? name them and tell me how we get rid of them and their contracts.

Wow, should be pretty self explanatory.

Hall/Ebs/Hemsky hands down better

Smyth probably better

I guess you could make a case that Jones is better

That leaves Eager/Hordichuk/Petrell as inferior players

Hordi and Petrell's contracts expire at the end of this year

Avatar
#92 edmonton Sux
March 06 2012, 02:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@ The beaker

Haha oiler Douche, please dont make fun of my grammar I cant take it no more.

Or is it make fun off ? hhmmm

Avatar
#93 Starving Student
March 06 2012, 02:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I see Penner back in Anaheim.

Avatar
#94 Lochenzo
March 06 2012, 02:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

How about bringing back Jarret Stoll? You always want a righty and a lefty for the faceoff circle. It would mean that we'd have to move a centre, but there's going to be some moving parts anyways if the Oilers are going to trade for a top 2 Dman.

Avatar
#95 Oiler AL
March 06 2012, 02:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@TrentonL

I'd sooner bring Stortini back, might be short on talent, but at least he has heart and is breathing. If Penner was such a great player, dont you think LA would have resigned him. They saw in a few weeks [ slow, lazy slug ] what took Oilers 3 years to realize., and now people want him back. His only hope is a place like Columbus at $1.5 per year .

Avatar
#96 TrentonL
March 06 2012, 03:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Oiler AL

I shut you down about your Penner's PP goals comment and you come back with he is still lazy and slow and you would rather have Stortini back?

Good argument, well thought out.

If Penner is so lazy/useless why does the puck consistently go in the right direction when he is on the ice/why is his team better when he is on the ice than off it?

FYI, Edmonton once upon a time thought that Dan Cleary and Kirk Maltby were disposable players Detroit thought otherwise.....

Avatar
#97 Millertime
March 06 2012, 03:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Penner's breakout year was under Quinn where he started on the third line with Brule. (Quinn wanted crust on each line and for some players to play a rougher style then they are accustomed to, hence the injuries and the fall for HAll, but I digress). I see no reason why he would not excell in a third line role at third line dollars. He will exceed third line expectations. Would he come back?

Avatar
#98 Beevbo
March 06 2012, 03:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Seen enough!!

Avatar
#99 smiliegirl15
March 06 2012, 03:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Too bad you can't have performance based bonuses. Honestly I think it would fix a lot of crappy players if they were paid based on their performance.

I think Penner with RNH and Eberle would be a good thing. Those two have good chemistry and Penner would compliment them. I like Hall with them but I think I like Hall with Hemsky better.

Avatar
#100 Wäx Män Riley
March 06 2012, 04:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
nunyour wrote:

don't we have enough slow lazy players?

who?

Comments are closed for this article.