The Edmonton Oilers Should Sign Josh Harding This Summer

Jonathan Willis
April 26 2012 07:37AM

Minnesota Wild goaltender Josh Harding earned $750,000 in 2011-12 as the backup to Niklas Backstrom. He’s an unrestricted free agent this summer, and the Oilers should give serious thought to bringing him aboard in time for next season.

But wait! The Oilers already have two goalies under contract for next season! Fortunately, there’s a simple solution to that: buyout Nikolai Khabibulin. A Khabibulin buyout makes sense, not only from a roster perspective, but also from a financial one. Bring Josh Harding in as his replacement.

The Oilers and Harding are a good fit for each other in a few ways. Let’s start with why the Oilers could use Harding.

At 27 years of age, Harding fits with the Oilers core group of players, and if all goes well could spend the next decade as an NHL goaltender. He’s a good goalie now; his save percentage for the woeful Minnesota Wild this season was a sparkling 0.917, and over 117 NHL games he’s posted a career 0.916 SV%.

Given his youth and proven level of NHL ability, Harding would give the Oilers a second strong option in net. This is desirable for a few different reasons. First, the competition for playing time would undoubtedly help push both Harding and Dubnyk. Second, redundancy in goal is always a good thing – in the event one guy gets hurt or struggles, there’s always a second capable guy around to help shoulder the load.

One of the underrated strengths of the glory years Oilers was their depth in net; early on the team had Andy Moog and Grant Fuhr splitting time in net; later on they had Fuhr and Bill Ranford. In all of Fuhr’s years with the Oilers, only once did he play more than 60 games – in 1987-88, when Moog left to play for the Canadian National Team until the Oilers sent him to Boston for Ranford and Geoff Courtnall.

Obviously, it’s far too early to compare a Dubnyk/Harding tandem to Fuhr/Moog, but there’s no denying the value of having a backup who can play regularly.

Still, if Harding has an attractive combination of talent and (relative) youth, why would he be interested in playing in Edmonton?

Part of the reason is the NHL goalie market: the simple fact is that there are more competent goalies available than there are job openings, particularly when the trade market is taken into account.

Beyond that, Harding’s injury history is a big risk for a team looking at him as a starter. A knee injury cost Harding the entire 2010-11 season. He’s missed time with both hip injuries and head injuries, and given that a team might hesitate when penciling him in for 60+ starts.

Edmonton is the perfect middle ground. Harding’s career save percentage is better than that of Devan Dubnyk, and he’d stand a decent shot at taking the starting gig away if he signed with the Oilers, and even if he didn’t he’d still undoubtedly play regularly. Because the Oilers already have Dubnyk, they’d be more willing to gamble on Harding’s health than a team with an untrusted backup would. The Oilers have also done a good job – with Martin Gerber and then Yann Danis – of having a third-string goalie who can play the last few years, so it’s reasonable to expect they’d be prepared in case of injury.

It seems like a situation that would work well for both parties.

This week by Jonathan Willis at Oilers Nation

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
April 26 2012, 12:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

@ nuge2nail

If you think Lander is a better option then Horcoff, I'd say you need the guidance as much as Tambillini.

Avatar
#4 Eulers
April 26 2012, 07:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Jonathan, you forget that Khabibulin has "fire in his belly" and is our MVP. We therefore do not need a young goaltender who can 'stop pucks'. #Ifixedit

Fire the Incompetent Steve Tambellini

Avatar
#5 Spydyr
April 26 2012, 10:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Only a person lacking vision and a comprehension of the CBA in the NHL would make a deal for Bobby Lou

Therefore I expect him to be an Oiler in the near future.

Avatar
#6 Jason Gregor
April 26 2012, 11:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@Jonathan Willis

How do the Oilers save money if they sign Harding? You think he will sign for less than $1.25 million?

They won't save money, and at this point isnt' Harding almost as much of a wild card as Khabibulin.

Harding has had injury issues, but he's much younger. Curious why if they don't save any money, you think Harding is guaranteed upgrade?

Avatar
#7 fuzzy muppet
April 26 2012, 11:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

How do the Oilers save money if they sign Harding? You think he will sign for less than $1.25 million?

They won't save money, and at this point isnt' Harding almost as much of a wild card as Khabibulin.

Harding has had injury issues, but he's much younger. Curious why if they don't save any money, you think Harding is guaranteed upgrade?

At this point, a garbage can is an upgrade on Khabibulin.

If the Oilers are serious about winning, NK will never play another game for them.

Avatar
#9 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
April 26 2012, 01:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@ Infinibuild

As others mentioned, asking the team to upgrade two defenders and a goaltender in the summer shouldn't be too much to ask.

Avatar
#11 Hemmercules
April 26 2012, 07:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Tamblo give up on his superstar? Never! He somehow defends that geezer when everyone and their dog knows he needs to be bought out. Love to have Harding but I don't think Tambo is capable of pulling off a smart move like that.

Avatar
#12 Ken
April 26 2012, 07:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I don't agree - Khabibulin will assist in Yakupov's transition to Edmonton.

Also - The Oilers have two excellent young goalies in the system.

Avatar
#13 russ99
April 26 2012, 08:05AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I wonder if the Oilers are on Luongo's trade list...

We'd rid ourselves of a big contract (Horcoff?) and send prospects and picks (not including this year's #1) and be set in goal.

Then buy out Khabi this summer if nobody wants him in a deal.

Avatar
#14 CC
April 26 2012, 08:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

If the market price for Harding is driven down by the potential availability of Luongo, Kipper, Tim Thomas as well as Vokoun. Then it makes sense if it's for the right term and price.

My gut it telling me that Harding goes to Columbus though, they won't be able to land one of the above players and unless they get a goalie for Nash he give Harding the best opportunity to start in the NHL.

Another option I would like is for the Oilers to buy-out Khabibulin and bring in two quality AHL goalies such as Yan Danis & Anton Khudobin (25 years old). Khudobin has had SV% of .919 this past year & .920 (Providence) / .911 (Houston) the year before. If the Bruins keep Thomas & Rask next year then Khudobin is in the minors again sharing time with Bruins prospect M. Hutchinson. He's looked good in the NHL with a career SV% of .961 in 7 games. His main issue is size.

Avatar
#15 justDOit
April 26 2012, 08:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
russ99 wrote:

I wonder if the Oilers are on Luongo's trade list...

We'd rid ourselves of a big contract (Horcoff?) and send prospects and picks (not including this year's #1) and be set in goal.

Then buy out Khabi this summer if nobody wants him in a deal.

Luongo's wife is from the Tampa area, and he still owns property there, so I'd say the chances of him agreeing to that trade would be ice cold.

I like the idea of signing Harding, and I believe people here are reading too much into Tambi's comments on him. He can't really come out and say, "Yeah, Nik played poorly for us this year, other than the first 10 games or so, but we're stuck with him until we find a sucker to trade him to or buy him out."

He has to 'pump Nik's tires' for a few reasons, one of them being that he just might need Khabby next season, and doesn't want a disgruntled, aging goalie with confidence issues.

It's like this: I'd love to be driving my old Toyota next year - but if I get the chance to sign a new one this summer, it's a done deal!

Avatar
#16 TrentonL
April 26 2012, 08:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

If this team had any intention of making the playoffs next season this would be a no-brainer. Unfortunately that is a better label for our inept GM.

Avatar
#17 Dipstick
April 26 2012, 08:28AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Ken wrote:

I don't agree - Khabibulin will assist in Yakupov's transition to Edmonton.

Also - The Oilers have two excellent young goalies in the system.

I'm sure Nail will like hanging out with grampa.

Avatar
#18 J-Dogg
April 26 2012, 08:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Even if Luongo's contract was a long 5 years as opposed to an unwieldy 9 remaining years, I'd rather not pick up the anti-clutch goalie who only seems to play at an elite level when it doesn't really matter.

Avatar
#19 Dman09
April 26 2012, 08:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

#1 I wouldn't want Lou as our goaltender even if we could get hime. I don't think he would fit in with the dynamics of the team.

I believe we have 2 AHL goalies who's contracts are ending. So I propose that the Oilers sign Harding and have the three compete in training camp and pre-season. You want to stay in the NHL earn it. The Likely outcome would be Bulin going down to OKC which isn't a bad idea, he would be a great mentor to one of Propects likely to be with OKC next season.

Also Nail has already played two years in Canada, I don't think he needs another Russian to help him fit in I think he will do just fine on his own and with his own age group.

Avatar
#20 jr_christ
April 26 2012, 09:05AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I know i certainly stand alone in my next comment...

I think Edmonton should consider Luongo :)

That is all.

Avatar
#21 Rama Lama
April 26 2012, 09:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

JW, what would Khabibulin, fetch on the market........I'm thinking trade this guy for a second round draft choice, and make Denis our back up.

Based on his play in the AHL, he deserves a chance.

Avatar
#22 rindog
April 26 2012, 09:28AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

What would Khabibulin's buyout $$$ be?

Avatar
#24 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
April 26 2012, 09:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

A UFA elibible goaltender who's making less than one mill per season? Nothing says you've arrived in the NHL better than being in the situation Harding is. The kid can't even stay healthy. Your sense of humor is on display in this effort Jonathan. Whats better than two goalies that struggle to stop the puck/stay healthy.....3 goalies can botch this up just as easily as two can. Pass on Harding, thanks.

Plug the 1 and 2 holes on the Oilers blueline before making a deal for a goaltender if need be. If the Oilers don't bring in a couple candidates for the #1 and #2 spots on the blueline, it won't matter who's playing goal here. A bottom ten finish is a lock if they don't fill those 1 and 2 spots.

Personally, i'm pulling for another work stoppage this coming season. The decision on who to draft is removed from the Oilers grasp if they keep having to select first overall. It's doing wonderful things to our top 6. MacKinnon without having to watch this team struggle for yet another year is the perfect storm.

Update: only 341 shopping days left till Shea Weber is a UFA.

Avatar
#25 PeOiler
April 26 2012, 09:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Willis Nation!

Avatar
#26 Infinibuild
April 26 2012, 09:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:

@ Infinibuild, rindog:

There's a link in the article detailing why a buyout makes perfect sense. It's got nothing to do with emotion - it has to do with the fact that the Oilers could save $1.25 MM buying him out, and that they can replace him for less than that. That's it.

Yes but you assume there is zero cost in terms of goodwill in a buyout. Perhaps thats true...

My point is that in 2012-2013 who cares about 1.25 million in savings VS the cost of shifting focus from what really matters (D and size up front) as well as some potential hard feelings.

Worry about goalie next year. Or this year at trade deadline. Maybe someone better will come up, I just don't see any reason to move now.

Avatar
#27 Team EHH
April 26 2012, 09:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I thought Khabi is ineligible for buyout because of his age when he signed his contract (35+) so that it would cost the Oilers the entire $3.75 million.

It makes more sense to me to try and deal him at the deadline for an asset to help the club.

Avatar
#28 steveb12344
April 26 2012, 09:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Give up the pipe dream guys.. Management has made it clear they will be honouring Habby's last year of his contract

We all know his days of being a solid #1 tender are behind him. It seems as though we will get one more year of him in a backup/mentor role.

He usually starts the season on fire, so maybe he gets 8-10 games early. Then another 15-20 the rest of the way, with a short leash though as management also has said they will be trying to make playoffs this year.

It might not be so bad like that. I also believe they intend on leaving a roster spot available for the eventual emergence of Roy or Bunz.

As far as Harding goes, be very leary of goalies from defencively oriented teams... Bryzgalov anyone?

What do you think the numbers would look like if Dubey played for minni, and harding with the oilers the last 2 years? I would bet they would be much different. You have to wonder how would Dubey look on Nashville or maybe Pheonix.

Lastly.. There is absolutely 0% chance Loungo ever sports the oildrop so just forget it!

Avatar
#29 rindog
April 26 2012, 09:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

So assuming Harding would sign for $750K, the Oilers would be saving themselves $500K in salary and be exchanging Khabibulin for Harding?

Just doesn't seem like a meaningful deal at this time...

Is there anything wrong with keeping Khabibulin's veteran presence for this last year and then address the back-up" goaltender the season after?

Avatar
#30 Team EHH
April 26 2012, 09:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Sorry. I checked the link and see that $1.25M could be saved ...but no asset in return.

I still don't agree that buying out Khabi is the best option for the club. I think it is better to put energies and money into building the defence, and acquire effective size and strength on the wings.

Avatar
#31 Cobalt
April 26 2012, 10:13AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Although it's hard to argue with the financial side of buying out Khabby, there may be more to it than meets the eye. He's not terrible as most would like to suggest and perhaps he brings value in areas that some of fail to recognize. To have a back-up with his demeanor and experience (including a Stanley Cup) is not worthless, and in fact may be part of the plan with such a young squad. Additionally, with Yakupov likely coming into the mix next year Khabby could act as a great mentor to him and ambassador for the City. It's not quite as simple as signing another russian ufa or hiring a translator.

On the flip side, to suggest Harding is the answer is doing so without knowing the full story. What do his teammates think of him? Is he coachable? How will he work with Dubnyk? With a young, impressionable group these are important questions to the know the answer to. To save a little money in buying out Khabby when cap space doesn't matter next year, I'd argue that it's more of a gamble to try and sign a guy like Harding than sticking with Khabby for one more year and giving him ~30 starts.

Avatar
#32 baggedmilk
April 26 2012, 10:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Out of curiosity, how many times have you watched Harding play live? Love the saw him good scouting.

Avatar
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

My problem with Harding is you have no idea how good he is as a starter. He's numbers have been all over the board in Minny and even Hackett had good numbers there this year.

Harding on a 1-2 year probably isn't a bad thing, but to think he will solve problems is a bit much.

There is nothing to make me believe he is a better than Dubnyk either. Sure Harding has better numbers, but we are splitting hairs if we think Harding's .917 makes him better than Dubnyk's .910. Especially given the teams.

Avatar
#34 Dman09
April 26 2012, 10:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Ogden Brother Jr. - Team Strudwick for coach wrote:

My problem with Harding is you have no idea how good he is as a starter. He's numbers have been all over the board in Minny and even Hackett had good numbers there this year.

Harding on a 1-2 year probably isn't a bad thing, but to think he will solve problems is a bit much.

There is nothing to make me believe he is a better than Dubnyk either. Sure Harding has better numbers, but we are splitting hairs if we think Harding's .917 makes him better than Dubnyk's .910. Especially given the teams.

Bulin was 53rd in save% over the entire league. So let put that in perspective. That means that almost every other team in the league had a starting and backup goalie that was better than Bulin even after his hot start. I could care less about the dollar values, money saved or spent. The fact remains that if this teams wants to win, they can't do it if every team in the league is getting better goaltending. Listen to Hall the kid wants to win and wants to win now. Keeping Bulin is like giving Hall dull skates and refusing to sharpen them for him.

Avatar
#35 DieHard
April 26 2012, 10:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Jonathan Willis

Your logic is sound. Khabibulin can either retire with 1.25M for the next 2 years or try for another contract as well. I don't believe there would be any hard feelings, I think Khabby knows the direction of the Oilers and he's just not cutting it. Try to sign Harding to a 3 year deal. It's a good age mix with Dubnyk/Harding. They can duke it out while we hopefully develop our goalie prospects to replace one of them in 3 years time or so.

Avatar
#36 dawgbone98
April 26 2012, 11:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@rindog

What's the purpose of Khabi's veteran presence when it literally costs the oilers wins?

And at some point, the Oilers have to start winning hockey games. The ELC's for Eberle and Hall both end next year, you really need something to show for it.

Bring another reliable goaltender and a couple of decent defencemen and go from there. Harding fits that bill.

Avatar
#37 dawgbone98
April 26 2012, 11:10AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Gregor, Khabibulin has statistically been one of the very worst goaltenders since the lockout. He's got a 3-33 record combined in the 2nd half of the last 2 seasons.

He's simply terrible, and there's almost no doubt that Harding is a better bet for next year and the near future.

Avatar
#41 striker777
April 26 2012, 11:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Very astute comment regarding needing Khabi to smooth Nail's introduction to NHL. This is something that I feel Oilers management never understood about Russian players.

If handled properly, it could turn into a gift that keeps on giving, because these guys get a better scoop on other Russian prospects, like Ovechkin's feedback to draft Kuznetsov late in the first round. That kid could be their Jordan Eberle.

Amazed at how deep some fans on here think. Love it!

Avatar
#42 David S
April 26 2012, 11:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Interesting how so many guys are saying "Leave the goaltending alone. It's fine for right now." while we watch playoff game after playoff game where it's blatantly obvious good goaltending is one of the keys (if not the primary one) to winning games.

If we really want to get back to winning next year rather than hacking through the season waiting for high draft picks we'll have to do something about goaltending. Hell man, Danis and Dubnyk would be a solid upgrade IMO, with Khabby our new $3.75M goalie coach.

Avatar
#43 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
April 26 2012, 11:37AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Mind boggling that people are arguing against bringing in another goalie.

Outside of a 8 - 10 game stretch (or whateve ever it was) Bulin was once again one of the worst goalies in the league.

If we want to win, bring in someone else. If we want another lott pick, go with Bulin again.

Pretty simple.

Avatar
#44 nuge2nail
April 26 2012, 11:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

To BE CLEAR ( IF STEVE luckily reads this)

Directions for the offseason - since you clearly need them.

Offense: 1.Draft Yakupov 30/40 goals a season helps win games. 2. Buyout/trade Horcoff (Lander, Belanger are better options) depending on the amensity clause in the new CBS - if not keep him as a 3rd liner and drop his minutes by 1/3 or find a coach who will. Too much offense is never a problem, injuries happen, be dynamic and skilled upfront.

Defense: 1. Sign 2 of Garrison, Carle, Wideman, Schultz(anaheim) and move everyone down the depth chart. A defense built of 3/4 guys can be solid(Canucks as an example) you dont need a #1. 20+ teams in the NHL operate without a Weber, Chara or Lidstrom.

Goaltending:Sign or trade for Lindback/Enroth/Thomas/Vokoun/Bernier/Harding/Luongo

2012 Lineup:

Hall Gagner Hemsky Yakupov Hopkins Eberle Smyth Horcoff Jones Hartkainen Belanger Eager

Petry Smid Garrison Wideman Whitney Shultz

Dubnyk/Lindback

Avatar
#45 DieHard
April 26 2012, 11:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Lexi wrote:

I believe upgrading the goaltending is the least important issue for the Oil in this offseason. I think if the Oilers can acquire 1 legit top 4 dman and 1 legit top 6 dman and they should be able to compete for a playoff spot. It should be a buyers market this year compared to last for dmen as I count at least 15 UFA who should be effective NHL top 6 guys that could be had for affordable contracts.

I don't think we should underestimate the value of having a Russian or two around to help Yak. In the salary cap NHL there is no more valuable asset that a first overall pick and for an 18 year old kid having someone who he can talk to in his own language and knows his culture could be quite valuable. (for this reason I think they should go hard for Tyutin who might be too expensive for Columbus and they will probably no longer need a Russian mentor)

The Yak has been in NA for 2 years now. I think the teenager will be comfortable with other teenage players. He's not a baby.

Avatar
#48 Lexi
April 26 2012, 12:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Yak lived with the Russian speaking family of his best friend and teammate Galchynuk. I think we forget these players are human and underestimate how hard breaking into the NHL is for guys who are from other countries and he will be dealing with not being the best player on his team for the first time in his career and the ups and downs of being a rookie so having a Russian on the team could be very valuable.

The NK contract was a disaster, but I do believe he can be adequate as a backup for 20 games this year. There's a reason guys are backups, they aren't that good. If there is one thing I learned from this playoff is that goaltending is a crapshoot and I believe DD is a legitimate top 20 goalie and that will be a good enough to contend for a playoff.

Avatar
#49 db7db7db7
April 26 2012, 12:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Team EHH wrote:

I thought Khabi is ineligible for buyout because of his age when he signed his contract (35+) so that it would cost the Oilers the entire $3.75 million.

It makes more sense to me to try and deal him at the deadline for an asset to help the club.

You're right As per CapGeek: Nikolai Khabibulin has a 35-plus contract (see our FAQ for a detailed explanation). A buyout of his contract will save the team in actual dollars but not in cap dollars. The total buyout cost is $2,500,000 spread over 2 years. His contract was originally valued at $15,000,000 beginning in 2009 and ending in 2013, with $3,750,000 remaining from the buyout year forward. The following is a season-by-season breakdown of the buyout. The "buyout" column shows how much the team must pay the player in each season of the buyout

Avatar
#50 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
April 26 2012, 12:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@ rindog

Why on earth is the playoffs not the absolute goal this coming year?

We're trending on worst team in history with this last three year stretch, time for the excuse to go away.

Comments are closed for this article.