MIXED BAG

Jason Gregor
June 13 2012 01:49PM

In a bitter twist of irony, the same week that the Oilers bring Craig MacTavish back into the fold, former Oilers Jarret Stoll and Matt Greene hoisted the Cup as members of the Los Angeles Kings. When the Oilers dealt Stoll and Greene to LA for Lubomir Visnovsky, MacTavish agreed with the decision, but yesterday he admitted that in hindsight that was a bad trade.

MacTavish is a smart guy, real smart, and I'm curious to see how he'll be in management compared to being a coach.

When MacTavish was here as a coach, he had a say in some player moves, especially in the last few years of his coaching tenure. It was refreshing to hear MacT admit that the Stoll/Greene trade was a mistake. Those guys aren't superstars, but they are excellent character players, and well respected in the dressing room. The Oilers could use two guys like that to compliment the young stars.

Of course, had the Oilers kept Greene and Stoll they weren't going to make them a contender for the Cup, and even worse, Taylor Hall and Ryan Nugent-Hopkins and this year's first pick wouldn't be here. The key for MacTavish and the rest of management is to learn from that mistake.

In his third stint in the organization; player, coach and now management, he needs to show that he's learned from the mistakes of the past. We all make mistakes, and every management team has made some, but the key is to learn from them and ensure they don't happen again.

MacTavish explained why the time was right to return, and he gave me his thoughts on what his role and contribution within the management framework will be.

"I think there is so much going on in the game today and so much is reliant on the management team to spit out the right decisions that I think you can get spread a little thin with management, and I look forward to jumping into every aspect of the game.

"The job of management is to identify value. Whether you are signing players and understanding what good value is, or whether you are trying to procure players into your organization and identify their value and potential, I need to use the experience I had as a player and coach and hopefully see things in players that make you believe they will improve or thgat you'll get good value for or from them."

The temperament and mindset of a coach is much different than a manager. Coaches want to win, and they rarely have the opportunity to look very far down the road. Very few coaches get to stick through an entire rebuild, ask Tom Renney, and while they might want to develop kids more slowly, the fact is, if a coach doesn't win he rarely sticks around.

MacTavish used to focus solely on the next game, but admits that his mindset will be different now. 

"I think it is natural that you are more patient as a manager. I've always said when I was coaching that is why there are managers, because the coach needs a governor to stifle some of the decisions you make based on the emotion of the game. You have the managers there to try and talk some sense into you in terms of overreaction to certain single events. As a manager you are not as immediately impacted, and from that perspective you are afforded more leeway and patience.

"I think as a coach it is more of a micro environment, where as a manager it is more of a macro environment where you are looking longer term and a little bit more of an abstract fashion, where as a coach you are just trying to win the next game."

DRAFT THOUGHTS

MacTavish has no plans of coming in and telling Stu MacGregor what to do, because MacGregor has done a fantastic job since he took over as head scout in 2008. MacT did give me his thoughts on what teams will be looking for next Friday.

"I think you want the best player, but that doesn't necessarily mean the best player in the next couple years, but the best players 10-15 years down the road. And by franchise players, I mean players that make your organization competitive for 15 years. Players like Sakic and Forsberg in Colorado. They did everything well. They were great leaders, they played well on both sides of the puck, they were very good offensively, physically solid and very good offensively. Detroit had four franchise players; Yzerman, Lidstrom, Datsyuk and Zetterberg who were their best examples of what players need to do to be successful. New Jersey had Brodeur, Scott Stevens and Patrick Elias. Ray Bourque made Boston competitive for 17 years, and those are the types of players you don't want to overlook in this draft by just immediately taking the guy who is great now. It is a deeper decision that just who is the best player at that (now) time."

COACHING

MacTavish knows a lot about coaching, and I asked him what characteristics he thinks the new coach in Edmonton needs to have in order to be successful.

"I think here it is just a case of getting a guy who can really sell a powerful message, and really help the players young and old in their ability to win. We need somebody who has a dynamic presence that can come in and really communicate that message and inspire this group of players. There has been a lot of negative reinforcement through losing the last few years and we need someone who can come in and wipe that away. You need management to come in and add a few pieces that will really tweak the player's interest going into training camp. Make it seem like a different team, a different element and turn the page on what has been a fairly painful period for Oiler fans and that the horizon looks bright.

"We need someone who can come in and really sell the message that the players are good enough to win. The flucutations that happened last year are examples of a team that when they are winning shows they are really strong, but the minute they start to lose they have a hard time overcoming that. You need somebody who has some good rapport and dynamic personality who can come in here and connect with the young players and inspire them to believe they can win championships."

System play is important, but I found it interesting that MacTavish focused more on the personality of a coach. This team needs a charismatic coach, with a mixture of tough love and support. For the past few seasons, the Oilers haven't had enough talent to compete, but I also felt like too often this team hasn't been mentally tough enough or confident enough.

Before ending our conversation I asked MacTavish what are the two most important areas the Oilers will need to improve on before training camp. 

"I think they are well documented. This game isn't that complicated when you analyze the personnel. We need a little bit of help on the defence, that would be my primary concern at this point. I think the veterans will respond next year to this environment, they need to be better, but my wish list, much like 17,000 people that watched them in Rexall on a nightly basis, will be to try and improve the defence. When we do that I think the team will have a real push forward."

RUMOUR MILL WILL HEAT UP

This was the headline last November, and of course the Oilers and Devils never came close to making any deals, but between now and the draft we'll hear lots of trade rumblings.

  • We've already heard Luke Schenn and the 5th pick from the Leafs for the 1st pick overall. Many said no way they'd do it, but considering I'd rather draft Alex Galchenyuk, if I knew that CBJ, MONT and NYI were going to pass on Galchenyuk I'd seriously consider that deal. I like Galchenyuk a lot, and while Schenn hasn't been great thus far in his career, he is still very young. Ladislav Smid took a long time to develop, and I think Schenn is very similar. He needs a change of address. The Oilers could draft Yakupov, and then if Galchenyuk was available at #5, I'd trade him for the pick and Schenn. My bigger concern is Schenn's contract, because he's already at $3.6 cap hit. 

    P.S...I doubt Leafs would do that considering they need a C more than a scoring winger.
     
  • Todd Nelson was in town interviewing for the head coaching job today. I'm hearing they might have one more interview to conduct before making a decision. I won't be surprised to see a new coach in place before they leave for the draft next Wednesday.
     
  • I spoke to a source in Anaheim and Bob Murray is now starting to look at potential offers for Justin Schultz. Many feel that the closer we get to June 25th the lower the return will be. Many teams are leery of giving up anything of substance just to secure the chance to negotiate with Schultz, because they feel Schultz wants to go to free agency. No team can offer him more money, and I'd be stunned if Schultz and his agent haven't already looked at which teams are a good fit. Why not tell the Ducks who those teams are and see if they can make a deal prior to June 25th.
     

Tomorrow is the Astral Caring for Kids Radio Broadcast from the Stollery Children's hospital. I've had the pleasure of doing my show there for the past six years, and every year I'm in awe of the love and support the staff and parents have for the sick children. The kids are truly inspiring and some tough little SOBs.

I've heard many listeners tell me it is hard to listen to some of the heartbreaking stories, but I hope you find the time to listen in tomorrow. Hopefully you've never had to take your child to the Stollery, and hopefully you never will, but I'd recommend doing a "pay-it-in-advance-donation" just in case you ever have to walk through those doors. You've read Brownlee's story of how the Stollery saved his son Sam's life, and if you've been in his shoes you know how incredibly awesome the doctors, nurses and support staff at the Stollery are.

Tune in, it might make ya tear up, but sports fans love emotion. Don't we? 

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#1 OilerLand
June 13 2012, 01:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I would love to sign Stoll this summer.

In Stu we trust. I want Yak but I'm not an expert. Whoever they call, or however the draft goes I'm going to cheer for that player with all my heart.

Avatar
#2 The Towel Boy
June 13 2012, 02:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

I missed the Silver Fox. Glad he's back in the fold.

Avatar
#3 vetinari
June 13 2012, 02:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

I appreciate it that in one interview alone in his first week on the job, MacT admitted that the Stoll/Greene trade was a mistake AND that our focus on the offseason should be on the defence. That seems to be more than what we typically get from Lowe and Tambellini in a normal month or more.

Frankly, I would have been comfortable with Tambi getting the boot and having a MacT (GM)/ Renney (coach) dynamic heading into the season.

Avatar
#4 dawgbone
June 13 2012, 02:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

The 1st for 5th and Schenn only really makes sense if (like you said) they are confident they can get the player they want at 5.

I mean if you have Murray, Dumba and Reinhart as virtually equal and you want one of them, it makes perfect sense to trade down and get a 22 year old defenceman who, despite his issues, might be able to contribute in the next couple of years (remember Smid at 22??). I mean, you are making that pick anyways, why not get an extra dart for the board?

On the flip side, if you like Yakupov as #1, that package isn't enough to sell me on moving off him.

I'd be disappointed if this was a legitimate offer and the Oilers passed and they took one of the defencemen at #1.

Avatar
#5 GSP
June 13 2012, 02:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Gregor...would you hold out for Gardiner & 5th overall from the leafs or would you still rather Schenn & 5th?

Avatar
#6 Marsha
June 13 2012, 02:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Do you have a list of the candidates the Oilers have interviewed for the coaching spot? We heard Nelson's name today....who else has had actual interviews??

Avatar
#7 Ales Hallsky
June 13 2012, 02:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Trading Greene, stoll, and raffi had little to do with hockey

Avatar
#8 The Fish
June 13 2012, 03:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

The Stollery is an amazing place and I will definitely be donating some coin tomorrow.

Avatar
#9 Dman09
June 13 2012, 03:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Marsha wrote:

Do you have a list of the candidates the Oilers have interviewed for the coaching spot? We heard Nelson's name today....who else has had actual interviews??

I was wondering the same thing????? Please say Cooper is on that list.

Avatar
#10 CaptainLander
June 13 2012, 03:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Marsha

Also wondering this, "We need someone who can come in and really sell the message that the players are good enough to win." sounds like a group of players I don't recognize the name of in Norfolk. The more I read about Cooper the more I think he may be the guy.

Avatar
#11 Dman09
June 13 2012, 03:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
CaptainLander wrote:

Also wondering this, "We need someone who can come in and really sell the message that the players are good enough to win." sounds like a group of players I don't recognize the name of in Norfolk. The more I read about Cooper the more I think he may be the guy.

Well his coaching record sure says he is 2:1 win ratio with something like 401-197-37 or something like that. A decade of winning records. Willis did an article earlier this week about him.

Avatar
#12 Archaeologuy
June 13 2012, 03:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

I would have and still would trade Greene and Stoll every day of the week for Lubo.

Avatar
#13 oilersinsider
June 13 2012, 03:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Here's the thing that worries me about Schultz. Unless you're the team he's been wanting to go to for the past however long, there should be some major concerns that this kid is going to be a problem down the road.

Even if you are that team, one has wonder what type of element you'll be introducing into your locker room and what happens at the end of his entry level deal.

I'm no Anaheim fan, and Schultz would be an unbelievable talent but at every turn this kid has shafted the organization who drafted him.

He's told them he'd want to play then he bailed. He isn't allowing them a chance to sign him, he isn't telling them his intention so they can get something without losing him for nothing...

Even though technically he isn't breaking any rules, he just seems like a huge talent but bad apple.

His talent better outweigh his appeared attitude.

Avatar
#14 Quicksilver ballet
June 13 2012, 03:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

MacT said..."I think here it is just a case of getting a guy who can really sell a powerful message, and really help the players young and old in their ability to win. We need somebody who has a dynamic presence that can come in and really communicate that message and inspire this group of players.

Of all the candidates interested in the Oilers coaching position, i think Jon Cooper, like Nail Yakupov, has seperated himself from the pack. Krueger and Cooper would make fine co-coaches.

Avatar
#15 Weasel Wellwood
June 13 2012, 03:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Mr. Vegas says:

i) The over under on when MacT replaces B'wana Steve is 1 year.

ii) Kreuger: 2:1; Sutter 3:2; Cooper: 119:1.

iii) Oilers active from July 1 onward is even money; Oilers successfully active from July 1 onward is 4:1 against.

iv) Oilers playoff hopes in 12-13: 5:1; Oilers playoff hopes in 13-14: Even money.

v) Oilers trading up in 12 draft: Even money.

vi) Brownlee being asked to assume Oilers Presidency: 2 to the 231 power against.

Avatar
#16 Shredder
June 13 2012, 03:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Based on MacT's comments it looks like the Oilers will be taking Ryan Murray (since he was invited to town). I say this because every example he gave had a dman involved in the group...(Det - Lidstrom, NJ - Stevens, Bourque in Bos, and while he didn't use one with the Col guys, there was certainly good defense on that team, along with the best goalie ever at the time). I wouldn't even be surprised if they took Murray #1 overall, although they could just as likely deal the pick as well.

Avatar
#17 EL PRESIDENTE
June 13 2012, 04:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Take YAK and don't look BACK.

Avatar
#18 Evilas
June 13 2012, 04:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

When they say dynamic personality, does anyone think Sutter? I think Jon Cooper.

Again as I had commented earlier this week, my money is on Cooper, and I expect them to make an announcement by the 20th.....I have been thinking about this a lot, and it would be the best move to keep Kreuger on as an assistant/associate coach.

I do expect them to pick Nail, but I also expect them to make some noise on the 22nd. I think at least 1 forward will be in play, and maybe even 4....Gagner, Hemsky, Belanger, Eager. And possibly Peckham, Omark. Don't want to see it, but PRV and one or two of our d prospects might be moved as well. If so, hopefully we get that big #2 Center and a top pairing dman or two. I also think Morgan Rielly is going to be the closest thing to Paul Coffey this league will see in a long time. I would love the Oil to grab him.....

Avatar
#19 Quicksilver ballet
June 13 2012, 04:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

MacT said..."I think you want the best player, but that doesn't necessarily mean the best player in the next couple years, but the best players 10-15 years down the road. And by franchise players, I mean players that make your organization competitive for 15 years.

WTF. From an organization that has trouble selecting kids who are still in the game 5 yrs post draft, how are they suddenly able to know which prospect is going to be better 10-15 yrs down the road? Do the Oilers have a new crystal ball nobody knows about?

Avatar
#21 EL PRESIDENTE
June 13 2012, 04:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I'm looking for an Oiler fan that works at the valley zoo and has access to the back paddock animals, I need to borrow a Yak so I can tie it to Tambo's front door this weekend.

Avatar
#22 Archaeologuy
June 13 2012, 04:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

@Archaeologuy

Pretty sure Lombardi would laugh you in the face if the Ducks wanted Greene and Stoll for Visnovsky now.

1) Stoll is UFA. Lombardi would be so lucky to get an offer for him.

2) Stoll and Greene played 16 minutes a night in the regular season. 3rd line/3rd pairing through and through. Very physical. Played a role no doubt. Visnovsky played 20 minutes a night in an injury shortened year.

3) Stoll and Green finished a combined +6 on an eventual cup winner. Lubo was +7 on the lousy Ducks.

4) Lubo outscored both of them in points with 27. Prorated over 82 games he would have almost tied their combined production. When you trade for a guy like Lubo you are trading for offense from the backend.

5) Lubo had his worst season since the lockout. He has, with regularity, scored more than 40 points a season for years.

I would trade 2 plug 3rd liners for Lubo any day of the week. Even ones who are getting the Stanley Cup bump in terms of overvaluation.

Avatar
#23 Fresh Mess
June 13 2012, 04:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I've been saying all along. Trade the pick.

Avatar
#24 Jasmine
June 13 2012, 05:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Shredder wrote:

Based on MacT's comments it looks like the Oilers will be taking Ryan Murray (since he was invited to town). I say this because every example he gave had a dman involved in the group...(Det - Lidstrom, NJ - Stevens, Bourque in Bos, and while he didn't use one with the Col guys, there was certainly good defense on that team, along with the best goalie ever at the time). I wouldn't even be surprised if they took Murray #1 overall, although they could just as likely deal the pick as well.

So were Yakupov and Grigorenko. Yakupov was the only one who was invited to have dinner with Katz.

Avatar
#25 OilDoug
June 13 2012, 05:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Mr. Gregor...........any chance the Oil place offers to Stoll or Penner this off season?

I think Ryan Smyth needs to go.

Avatar
#26 BlueMile
June 13 2012, 05:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Archaeologuy

@ Archaeologuy, after 12 years in the NHL, Lubo has played 70+ games 5 times, and 60+ games 7 times. Always wanted to keep him instead of trading him, but the guy plays a style that gets him injured frequently. Good offensive defenseman, but at the time, he got traded for a player (Whitney) with a similar injury history and ppg average, who is 7 years younger and significantly bigger. Might be a lateral move, but not exactly a loss.

Point being: Visnovsky and the term "injury shortened year" in the same sentence are expected, at least with Whitney, time is on our side.

Avatar
#27 Mutt Heatly
June 13 2012, 05:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

OT:

Does Ralph Krueger remind anyone else of Badger Bob?

Avatar
#29 TigerUnderGlass
June 13 2012, 05:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

@Jason Gregor

Teams need certain players to win. No team wins with just skilled players. You always seem to think that is all you need.

No team wins with just skilled players because no team can afford to fill a lineup with just skilled players.

3rd line players play the way they do because hey are not as good at hockey and need to make up for it, not because of any mystical combination of styles required on a roster.

if Vis was so great for playoffs how come he's only won one playoff round his ENTIRE career.

Are you really asking why he didn't single handedly carry the teams he played for on a playoff run? Has any player ever done that?

3rd line plug...Again you undervalue.

They are 3rd line players because they are not as good. If they were they would be on a different line.

It isn't just about icetime and points. You think Visnovsky is better than Jack Johnson. Kings traded him away and won...

I don't know what you are getting at here. Jack Johnson is a terrible defenseman and getting rid of him likely helped their playoff run tremendously.

I should also add that wanting a good 3rd line center does not make the 3rd line center more important than you #1 defenseman. There is no logical connection between those two thoughts.

Avatar
#30 Archaeologuy
June 13 2012, 05:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

@Jason Gregor

Yeah but here we are years later and laughing at the idea of trading Stoll and Greene for Lubo. Meanwhile everyone and their dog wants the Oilers to get a top pairing puck moving defenseman. AND we're debating trading the 1st overall pick for one!!

We traded 3rd line players for that exact player a few years ago. Now we're looking back at that trade like it was bad.

Avatar
#31 Evilas
June 13 2012, 06:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

We all know that teams with depth go far in the playoffs, so if you can trade away for 2 roster players, while giving up one, then theoretically you are ahead. I think this is Gregor's argument.

I thought before that trade that Stoll was leaving soon, because of his new main squeeze, Rachel Hunter. Are they still together?

Avatar
#32 Oilcan
June 13 2012, 06:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I hope the Oilers take Yakupov at first overall but just spitballin here but if the Oilers trade 1st overall to the leafs for Gardiner and 5th overall I think that is a pretty sweet deal for the Oilers, add to the fact that getting Gardiner probably makes the Schultz a lock for the Oilers, so the Oilers were able to get 2 pretty good defenseman (And top 4 in no time possibly top 2) for a drop to #5 where they get the leftovers of either Grigerenko, Galchenyuk, Murray or Forsberg. I would take the deal for the Oilers even taking Murray then let him develop another year in the WHL or play bottom pairing to develop:

D:

Smid-Petry Whitney-N Schultz Gardiner-J Schultz

Is a nice d core with potential. Allows Musil, Klefbom and Marincin to develop properly and fill in for Whitney and Schultz when they leave.

The Oilers go from a position of weakness to strength.

Avatar
#33 oilers2k12
June 13 2012, 06:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

I wont trust Stu until someone other than Ebs, Hall, and RNH becomes a key contributor on this team, players need time to develope I'll give him that, but as of now I'm not gonna be part of this "in Stu we trust" faction.. Yeah he hit a homerun with Eberle..great, one steal in five years, now what else can he do? (yes there may be more in the system, but as of today we dont know if anyone that hes drafted will have an impactfull nhl career, great to dream, but I want proof)

Avatar
#34 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
June 13 2012, 06:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

The only issue now with Lubo vs Stoll/Green would be the same issue from 4 years ago. You are giving up 5 years in age.

Other then that you always trade the 2/3C + 5D for the 1/2D

Avatar
#35 John Chambers
June 13 2012, 06:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@TigerUnderGlass

Wow, you crushed that. Accurate, concise, and conclusive. Well argued, well played.

Avatar
#36 Butters
June 13 2012, 06:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

The comment Mac T made about taking the player who will be the best player in 10-15 years worries me. That's sounds like a dman to me.

Avatar
#39 GVBlackhawk
June 13 2012, 07:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

MacT said..."I think you want the best player, but that doesn't necessarily mean the best player in the next couple years, but the best players 10-15 years down the road. And by franchise players, I mean players that make your organization competitive for 15 years.

WTF. From an organization that has trouble selecting kids who are still in the game 5 yrs post draft, how are they suddenly able to know which prospect is going to be better 10-15 yrs down the road? Do the Oilers have a new crystal ball nobody knows about?

My thoughts exactly. They should start with making the playoffs. 10-15 year timelines? That's just dumb.

Avatar
#40 Harlie
June 13 2012, 07:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
The Fish wrote:

The Stollery is an amazing place and I will definitely be donating some coin tomorrow.

Right on Fish, I'll be in for a hundy. I also challenge the rest of the ON ologosphere to match or take the beats!

I'm loving MacT's interviews. He gives more info than número 3 "Tambi"

Avatar
#41 Mitchell
June 13 2012, 07:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Usually I disagree with Gregor, but he just crushed Tiger. Kings didn't need Visnovsky to win, and skill comes in variety of ways, not just offensively.

I wonder if this means the real Tiger, Mr. Woods has no chance this weekend? Hope so.

Avatar
#42 TigerUnderGlass
June 13 2012, 07:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Jason Gregor

Teams can't afford it? Really? So in the pre-lockout days, which existed for decades teams didn't do it for finances.

You tell me. Does 'no cap' = 'Unlimited budgets'?

Would the '88 Oilers take Nieuwendyk for MacTavish, despite the lack of 3rd line-ness?

Would Detroit take Eberle for Helm or is Eberle not 3rd line-y enough?

There is an argument floating around that a team with 4 Gretzky-Kurri lines couldn't win a cup. That argument is an embarassment to logic.

The role of any hockey player is to outplay the opponents in front of them. There is no formula as to how this must be done.

Many skilled guys aren't willing to kill penalties, or battle for pucks in the corners.

So now skill is synonymous with lazy? I didn't say a team can win with 4 lazy skill lines, I said they can win with 4 lines of superior hockey players.

Johnson is much younger, I wouldn't write him off yet, but my point was he is just like Visnovsky, so why would LA prefer Visnovsky. They dealt Johnson and won, they didn't need Visnovsky to win. They needed Stoll in his role and Greene in his. Visnovsky wouldn't play Greene's role. He wasn't going to kill penalties.

This still makes no sense. Johnson and Visnovsky are nothing alike. Visnovsky is very good, Johnson is terrible. Greene's role is "kill time and don't get scored on until the good players get back on the ice". Visnovsky's role is "good player".

No, I was pointing out that if he is your #1 D-man you likely won't win, because he isn't a legit #1

Fine. Call him a #2. He is still more important than either of those guys.

And if you'd actually read rather than look to just bitch, you'd notice that I said Arch undervalued importance of a solid #3 centre

Really? A tad unfair, but you know this. I'll address your point anyways.

You said he undervalued because he suggested a #1 D was more important than 3rd liners. The obvious implication is that you believe the #1 D is NOT more important.

The Kings wouldn't have traded Stoll and Greene for Visnovsky at the deadline. No chance.

Why are you comparing making that deal now with making it 4 years ago? Of course they wouldn't do it now, he's 35 years old.

Guys like Stoll and Greene can be found every year. Guys like Visnovsky cannot.

Avatar
#43 TigerUnderGlass
June 13 2012, 07:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Mitchell

skill comes in variety of ways, not just offensively.

Who suggested that offensive skill is the only kind? It certainly wasn't me. What conversation are you reading?

Avatar
#44 oilers2k12
June 13 2012, 07:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@GVBlackhawk

Not sure if you can seperate "best player in 10-15 years from now" with consensus number one today.. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that Yakupov wont be every bit as good as Stamkos, the guy broke Stamkos junior rookie scoring record..

If Yakupov was born in North America and doubt as to whom oilers are taking number one wouldve ended the day they won the lottery.. dont tell me that somehow oilers scouts know better than 99 percent of scouts out there, and how can you predict how good someone will be 10 years from now? Yaks has a great attitudem plays physical, wants to be here, and is clearly the bpa(we dont know about galchenyuk due to injury) so its easy, yakupov it is.

Avatar
#45 2:00 AM
June 13 2012, 07:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Imagine if Tambellini informed us of the things Mact has informed us of in the short time hes been back. One thing i am definitely looking forward to is at least knowing the basic short term plan. Mact will serve as the public media interview guy bc tambi and lowe are terrible at that/

Avatar
#46 Max Powers - Team HME Evans
June 13 2012, 08:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I officially apologize to our lord and saviour, MacT, for being part of the BBM. I was wrong, so so wrong.

I've changed. I promise.

Avatar
#48 Ed in Mada
June 13 2012, 08:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

A very interesting discussion about the value of 3/4 liners.

The seemingly obvious conclusion that a team of 1/2 liners will be better than a a "conventional mixed team" may not always be sopported by history.

After their 1st cup the Oil traded away Ken Linseman who would have been by far the most tallnted 3rd line center (after Gretzky and Messier) in the league. Why did they do this? Economy measure or that the Rat couldn't provide 3rd line skills or wouldn't accept a 3rd line role?

On the great Hab teams of the 70s Doug Jarvis, the defintion of a 3rd line center, would frequently log bigger minutes in playoffs than the the so called "2nd line center". Between match up with the other team's first line and PK Jarvis frequnetly logged near 20 minutes per game,even though he was a solid 5 goal a year man.

The comment about Nuwendyke and Mctavish is quite selective. Nuwendyke was a very complete player, could score, had physical presence and defensively sound. Yes he could play any forward role. However, could Craig Janney (the Bruin's 1st line center in two cup finals) have transitioned as easily?

Avatar
#49 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
June 13 2012, 08:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Jason Gregor

But many skill guys are willing to and do kill penalties + dig out pucks. In fact I'd bet most teams get a high % of their penalty killing from their top two lines.

Avatar
#50 GVBlackhawk
June 13 2012, 08:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Harlie wrote:

Right on Fish, I'll be in for a hundy. I also challenge the rest of the ON ologosphere to match or take the beats!

I'm loving MacT's interviews. He gives more info than número 3 "Tambi"

I just donated a grand to the cause. One of the best charitable donations a person can ever make.

Comments are closed for this article.