Big Decisions: Jarret Stoll and Matt Greene for Lubomir Visnovsky

Jonathan Willis
June 14 2012 08:16AM

More than a few fans of the Edmonton Oilers have been watching the Stanley Cup Finals with some envy. In Los Angeles, both Jarret Stoll and Matt Greene did an excellent job in specific roles, helping the Kings to their first ever Stanley Cup win. The Kings acquired the pair from Edmonton back in the summer of 2008 in exchange for Lubomir Visnovsky.

We’ve previously discussed the way that playing for a good team versus a bad team can shift perceptions of a useful role player – Colin Fraser seemed like a much better fourth-liner in Los Angeles than he did in Edmonton, and to some extent the same effect is happening here.

Prior to this season, Stoll and Greene had never made it out of the first round with the Kings. In the three years before this one, Los Angeles had won a total of four playoff games. Stoll had never come close to recapturing the 68-point form he’d had in Edmonton back in 2005-06 (in fact, this season he picked up six goals and 21 points, worse totals than his rookie year). Greene was improved from his time in Edmonton – where both his discipline and positioning had been questionable – and had rounded into a solid #5 defenseman who could also kill penalties, but even so he wasn’t entrusted with the toughest assignments; the Kings brought in Rob Scuderi and Willie Mitchell to take those.

It’s important not to overstate the contribution of the duo to this year’s championship.

Jarret Stoll remains a physical center who excels on the penalty kill, has good size, and can play a third line role. That’s what he did in L.A., behind Anze Kopitar and Mike Richards. He’s a good NHL player in that role, but he’s also extremely limited – especially offensively. Despite playing 17:06 per game, he finished ninth of the Kings’ top-nine forwards in scoring. At times this season, when the Kings were starving for offense, Stoll was part of the problem. Colin Fraser was more likely to pick up a point on any given even-strength shift. Adjusting for ice-time, Shawn Horcoff contributed 35% more offense than Stoll – and unlike Stoll, Horcoff played top opponents all season long.

I don’t mean to beat up on Stoll here – he’s a very good defensive forward – but it’s important not to misstate what he is. He’s a checking line forward who needs power play time to get points; at even-strength, his attention to defense means that goals are few and far between.

It’s a similar story with Matt Greene. He’s a useful number five defenseman – and I was very impressed with his work on the penalty kill – but the way his coach used him betrays his limitations. Take Game Six against New Jersey. Ilya Kovalchuk played almost 15 minutes of even-strength ice-time; Greene lined up against him for less than two. Alexei Ponikarovsky played just over 11; Greene saw him for six full minutes. It’s a pattern that held true all through the post-season for L.A. – Greene and his regular partner, Alec Martinez, consistently got the bottom-six players from the other team as regular opponents, and consistently spent less time in their own end than the other two defense pairings.

That’s not a slight on Greene; he’s a good third-pairing defenseman. But it’s important to remember that he wasn’t a top-four, Jason Smith-style shutdown option for the Kings. Those jobs went to superior players – Rob Scuderi and Willie Mitchell.

That’s why I think the Oilers made the right decision when they traded for Lubomir Visnovsky. They moved a pair of good support players for a highly-talented blue-liner. It was a trade that made sense at the time, and if they could trade a third-line centre and a third-pairing defender for a talent like Visnovsky today they’d be crazy not to do so.

Visnovsky is not only a top-four defenseman, he’s the exact sort of offensive threat the Oilers have been lacking since they dealt him to Anaheim. In his first year, he picked up 31 points in 50 games. He scored 45 the next year; in 2010-11 he led all NHL defensemen with 68 points. This year he was slowed by injury but still managed to record 27 points, six more than Stoll did. Despite playing for two lousy teams in Edmonton and Anaheim, he’s a plus-21 since leaving L.A.; Stoll and Greene combined are plus-14 despite making the playoffs in three of four seasons with the Kings.

That’s not to say the Kings made a mistake when they dealt Visnovsky. Indeed, it’s hard to imagine he would still be with the Kings today even had they kept him; his salary would have made him an extravagance on such a deep blue line.

But the Oilers made a move that benefitted their team when they pulled the trigger on that deal, sending away depth players – good depth players, but depth players all the same – to address a position of need, a position that still needs to be addressed in the worst way. It was the right call.

Post-script: This piece was written prior to my reading Craig MacTavish's thoughts on the Visnovsky trade. I'm still not convinced; for all the virtues of both Stoll and Greene, Visnovsky was easily the best player in the deal and the kind of piece the Oilers have consistently needed since Pronger's departure.

Previously in this series

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 Oilcruzer
June 14 2012, 08:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I would have made that trade too.

Avatar
#2 dawgbone
June 14 2012, 08:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Now the question is Stoll & Greene or Whitney?

Avatar
#4 Tracie
June 14 2012, 08:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Thanks for breaking this down for us Jonathan! Great article!

Avatar
#5 Peter
June 14 2012, 08:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Using only paper stats only tells one side of the story. Stoll and Greene were great leaders, and I know you think this has no value, but sorry you are wrong.

Glue guys are key to winning, and the Oilers have none of them. Stoll would be a perfect fit here. Wins draws, good in own zone and would be heavy right handed shot on PP.

You can say you'd rather have Visnovsky than Stoll and Greene cause he's, in your eyes, the better player, but facts are facts. Oilers didn't improve with Visnovsky on team.

And 35 of his 63 points over two years came on PP with Oilers. He needed PP to score just like Stoll.

Visnovsky doesn't seem to help teams win. Which is biggest key in my books. If he was as dominant as some suggest his teams would have had more success, but when he's your #1 D, teams haven't won. What does that tell you?

Avatar
#6 MJNation
June 14 2012, 08:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Let's stop living in the past and move forward with the superstars of tomorrow. I loved Stoll We lost him. It's the nature of the beast now. Life changed after the Greatest One EVER was traded

Avatar
#7 OB1 Team Yakopov - F.S.T.N.F
June 14 2012, 08:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Amen JW, amen.

1/2D >>>> 2/3C + 5D

Avatar
#8 Cody anderson
June 14 2012, 08:40AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

If Whitney is healthy there is no question. On this team right now Stoll would be an upgrade on our 4th line centre and Green would be an upgrade on our 3rd deffensive pairing. 4th line centres and 3rd pairing defenseman are much easier to come by than a 1b/2a pairing defenseman. If Whitney regains his form and remains healthy he is one of our best defenseman, and those top pairing, minute munching defensemen are the main point of need on this team.

Avatar
#9 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 08:45AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Hey JW,

I'm curious, does Visnovsky always play against other teams best players? I haven't looked it up, but I'd like to know.

He's one of the nicest guys I've ever interviewed, but when I watched him I never felt like he controlled a game.

Straight up he's better than both, but when I look at intangibles of them, I think they do more small things to help a team.

Turns out it was better for Oilers they didn't keep those two, cause they wouldn't have Hall or RNH most likely.

Avatar
#10 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 08:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Cody anderson wrote:

If Whitney is healthy there is no question. On this team right now Stoll would be an upgrade on our 4th line centre and Green would be an upgrade on our 3rd deffensive pairing. 4th line centres and 3rd pairing defenseman are much easier to come by than a 1b/2a pairing defenseman. If Whitney regains his form and remains healthy he is one of our best defenseman, and those top pairing, minute munching defensemen are the main point of need on this team.

You'd take Horcoff over Stoll? Disagree.

Avatar
#11 Rick
June 14 2012, 08:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Maybe I'm splitting hairs on the wording but the Oilers definately didn't make the right decision on that trade.

They made a good trade based on talent or on paper but it clearly was not the 'right' trade for this team.

And to be clear I liked the deal at the time and I still like Lubo more than any player involved (I like all three) but it wasn't a good deal for the organization.

One detail that I go back to when thinking about that trade was Stoll's concussion problems. At the time he was moved it looked like there was a very real chance he would never be the player he was 2 years earlier. In the end he fully recovered and I am glad for him that he did but it does change the circumstances of the time when you think back.

Avatar
#12 oilers2k12
June 14 2012, 08:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I can see Belanger getting dealt to next years stanley cup champions where he will be known for his high faceoff winning percentage, reliable defensive play, and be key to a teams penalty kill..

Avatar
#15 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 08:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Jonathan Willis

He also played lots with Perry on PP and EV, which didn't hurt. He has huge ups and downs in his point totals...Goes three years as 30 or 40 guy, then spikes to 68, then back to 27. Strange..

He's clearly better player, but I've never seen him be a difference maker in playoffs, which is what you want from you #1 D.

Avatar
#16 Dman09
June 14 2012, 09:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

You'd take Horcoff over Stoll? Disagree.

I don't think I could make an accurate decision without seeing Horcoff playing the same role as Stoll. Horcoff has been playing a bigger role and would think his numbers would drop in a role similar to stolls.

Avatar
#17 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 09:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Jonathan Willis

JW,

Bourque led his team to two Cup finals, and lost to one of greatest teams ever. He won lots, just not the Cup.

Visnovsky hasn't made it past first round since rookie season. I wouldn't compare him to Bourque.

Same with Gretzky, lost in final.

To me winning, isn't just winning Cup, but having your team competitive year after year, which Bourque did.

No one player can win by himself, but isn't Visnovsky not close to Bourque.

When you look at D-man making $5.5 million, outside of Bouwmeester, Lubo has least amount of success.

Lidstrom, Niedermayer, Pronger, Keith and even Campbell got his team to playoffs this year.

Over the years, Lubo never was a guy who impacted the game like others in his payscale. IMO.

For the record, I think Vis is better straight up than Stoll or Greene, but I think he's overrated.

Avatar
#18 EasyOil
June 14 2012, 09:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Jonathan Willis

Would you sign Jarret Stoll on July 1st? Not sure he'd want to come back to the Oilers, but from our point of view he'd represent a huge upgrade on Belanger surely.

As for his offensive output, whilst I agree he needs the PP to score, it looks to me like he had a Belanger-type season - nothing went his way and historically he's a much better scorer than this year shows. I haven't looked at the deeper numbers, but I can't imagine that Stoll's ability on offence just vanished. What was his PP time the last 3 years when he had 40+ points?

Avatar
#19 Eddie Edmonton
June 14 2012, 09:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

He also played lots with Perry on PP and EV, which didn't hurt. He has huge ups and downs in his point totals...Goes three years as 30 or 40 guy, then spikes to 68, then back to 27. Strange..

He's clearly better player, but I've never seen him be a difference maker in playoffs, which is what you want from you #1 D.

What exactly is strange? Most D-Man points come from second assists. I don't understand what is so strange?

Difference maker in the play-offs? I doubt you seen him in the play-offs and thought that. I doubt he's been in more than 2-3 play-offs series. Which series and year are you refering to?

Hockey is a team sport. Perry, Getzlaf and Ryan are the drivers for his team, not Lubo. How does the lack of success by the team fall on him?

Avatar
#20 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 09:17AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Peter

I'd agree on the "glue guys" part. To me that was biggest mistake Oilers made. They got rid of all their middle tier guys.

Of course they needed high-end guys, so I understand why they made the deal, but they didn't have enough good middle guys to replace Stoll and Greene.

That is the problem when you have no depth, if you make a deal it is hard for to actually be better, since they improved one area, high-end skill, but then didn't have anyone to take over for Stoll.

Although they did have Brodziak, but of course they made awful decision and traded him instead of Pouliot. Ugh.

Avatar
#21 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 09:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Eddie Edmonton

Eddie he hasn't been in playoffs, thanks for proving my point that he doesn't lead teams to victory.

Also elite D-men don't jump by 30 points one year and then go back down. Most stay fairly consistent.

Go look at Pronger, Niedermayer and Lidstom...point total fairly even, rather than odd 30 point increases...

And I did watch Visnovsky last year for Ducks...Wasn't a guy who controlled play like many true #1s.

Avatar
#22 Dman09
June 14 2012, 09:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

Eddie he hasn't been in playoffs, thanks for proving my point that he doesn't lead teams to victory.

Also elite D-men don't jump by 30 points one year and then go back down. Most stay fairly consistent.

Go look at Pronger, Niedermayer and Lidstom...point total fairly even, rather than odd 30 point increases...

And I did watch Visnovsky last year for Ducks...Wasn't a guy who controlled play like many true #1s.

Just out of curiosity did you look at the games player in each of those season totals? I'm with you though I don't view him as an elite level defenseman. For me he would be more of a #3 with lots of PP time.

Avatar
#23 Matt Henderson
June 14 2012, 09:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Thank you JW.

This was my exact argument in the Mixed Bag comment section. It's like you tapped into my mind here.

To add something. This type of player, a Top 2 D who is adept at moving the puck, is exactly the type of player the Oilers are rumoured to be asking for in return for the 1st overall pick. And they already got him once in exchange for two 3rd line players.

Avatar
#24 jooks
June 14 2012, 09:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

The oil took a stab at getting an offensive dman at a time when they needed one and were relatively good at finding grinders/glueguys (based on previous history with klo running the show). Since then (coincidentally or not coincidentally after Tambo has been running the show) they've worked themselves into a position of being able to grab elite level players via the draft but seemingly inept at procuring grinders/glueguys, hence our continuous lament for guys like Stoll and Greene. Seems to me we should be employing the proper management who CAN find these guys effectively. Perhaps hiring Mac-T is a step in the right direction.

Avatar
#25 Eddie Edmonton
June 14 2012, 09:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Jason Gregor

I'm not saying Lubo is a leader. I'm not even saying he is an elite #1 D-Man. You compare him to Lidstrom, Pronger and Niedermayer. Name me one person or a GM in the world that would trade you Lidstrom/Pronger/Niedermayer for Stoll and Greene?

Just so I understand: you're blaming Lubos team lack of success on his point total? Nothing to do with the group that surrounds him, just his point total?

Lubo is a #2 D-Man and should be on any team. Maybe he just never had a right team to win on, like Ray.

Avatar
#26 TigerUnderGlass
June 14 2012, 09:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Jason Gregor

Visnovsky hasn't made it past first round since rookie season.

Do you believe this has nothing to do with playing for bad teams his whole career?

An argument that a team would be better having him as their second best defenseman makes sense.

The argument that since you want someone better as number one he should be traded for 2 3rd line/3rd pairing guys does not.

When you look at D-man making $5.5 million, outside of Bouwmeester, Lubo has least amount of success.

Other unsuccessful Defensemen with large cap hits next year include:

Andrei Markov - 5.75 Myers, Tyler - 5.5 James Wisniewski - 5.5 Byfuglien (as a defenseman) - 5.2 Wade Redden - 6.5 Dion Phaneuf - 6.5

We can probably expect to add Wideman and Garrison to the list as well.

Avatar
#27 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 09:44AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Eddie Edmonton

He was paid like elite #1 and he never was one is my point.

Bourque was main reason Bruins were competitive.

OF course no one would trade Stoll/Greene for Lubo, which illustrates my point. Never was #1 D-man, but been paid like one for years. And he's not a guy you build around. Better than Stoll and Greene individually, no question, but he history proves he doesn't help his team win.

Avatar
#29 DSF
June 14 2012, 09:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

The problem with the the trade wasn't the player but the timing.

The Oiler brass should have been building a young defense not trading away two relatively young players for an aging puck mover.

And, of course, they compounded the error when the traded Visnovsky for Whitney without due consideration for his medical history.

Avatar
#31 Eddie Edmonton
June 14 2012, 09:54AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

He was paid like elite #1 and he never was one is my point.

Bourque was main reason Bruins were competitive.

OF course no one would trade Stoll/Greene for Lubo, which illustrates my point. Never was #1 D-man, but been paid like one for years. And he's not a guy you build around. Better than Stoll and Greene individually, no question, but he history proves he doesn't help his team win.

Horcoff is paid like he is the #1 in the league. It is not Horcoffs fault, just like it isn't Lubos fault what he gets paid. What GMs decided to pay them falls on them and not the players.

Bourque made Bruins competative not champions. Avalanche made Bourque a champion.

You misread my comment. I was saying that Lubo is not Pronger or Lidstrom due to the fact that neither one of the two players would be gotten for Stoll and Greene, Lubo was.

I don't think it is fair to judge a player by the success of their team, ex: Ilya and Thrashers.

Avatar
#32 Cody anderson
June 14 2012, 09:55AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Hey Jason, because of Horcoff's salary absolutely I would take Stoll over Horcoff. Other than that I would think they are very comparable players.

Do you think Stoll is a better player? If so, which aspects of his game are signifigantly better. I think horcoff is an efficient 3rd line centre. not the best in the league but certainly not the worst.

I do think Stoll is better physically which could be used on this team.

Avatar
#33 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 10:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Jonathan Willis

Yes Jon, but he eventually made his teams competitive. Visnovsky never has. Not sure why you don't see this. Compare him to other D-man in his pay scale and show me others who had as little success as him.

Also Mario only missed playoffs in his first FOUR years, not six. He made playoffs in his 5th year, the year he scored 199 points.

And I don't hate the player, just pointing out that he hasn't been a difference maker. Sometimes better players, don't make teams better.

Avatar
#34 TigerUnderGlass
June 14 2012, 10:01AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

Eddie he hasn't been in playoffs, thanks for proving my point that he doesn't lead teams to victory.

Also elite D-men don't jump by 30 points one year and then go back down. Most stay fairly consistent.

Go look at Pronger, Niedermayer and Lidstom...point total fairly even, rather than odd 30 point increases...

And I did watch Visnovsky last year for Ducks...Wasn't a guy who controlled play like many true #1s.

Niedermayer had a stretch that went 35-57-46-38.

Lidstrom had a stretch where he went from 62, down to 38, and then back way up to 80.

Prongers only 60+ season was bookended by 40+ point seasons.

Frankly, I don't know why you made this comparison. Nobody has argued that Visnovsky is as good as these guys anyways. We are arguing that he is more valuable than 3rd line/3rd pairing players.

Avatar
#35 Cody anderson
June 14 2012, 10:03AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Another question. If we signed Stoll for a reasonable contract and traded Belanger who would you put on the 3rd line/4th line?

If I was unable to trade Horcoff and his salary I would keep him on the third line and put Stoll on the 4th line where that physicality is even more important.

Avatar
#36 blueorangekoolaid
June 14 2012, 10:05AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Saw what looked like a silly proposition at first but as I thought of it a bit more, it started to intrigue me. Gags and Smid to Anaheim for 6th overall and rights to J. Schultz. It seems to make sense to me value wise, might have to throw in a mid-round draft pick or something to make all sides happy but what does everyone think?

Use 6th to draft either another D-man like Reinhart, Dumba or Reilly (whoever is available) or possibly one of the C still available (Galchenyuk or Grigorenko). Could still use number 1 on Yakupov or trade it for more proven assets or that Toronto package (Schenn + 5th).

Gags, Smid, 1st for 5th, 6th, J. Schultz and L. Schenn seems like a reasonable arrangement. Draft Galchenyuk and one of Dumba, Reilly or Reinhart. Try and sign UFA Penner, rebuild complete? Maybe my blue and orange koolaid is too strong.

Hall, RNH, Ebs Penner, Galchenyuk, Hemsky Smyth, Horc, Jones Eager, Belanger, Petrell

Hall and Penner could interchange if chemistry is better

MPS, Lander, Harti in OKC

Whitney, J. Schultz N. Schultz, Petry Sutton/Peckham/Potter/Fedun/Teubert

D pipeline will be solid with new kid plus Klefbom, Musil, Gernat, Marincin etc.

A novel for a comment but it feels good to get it out there. I like to think it's not completely homer-ish this proposal.

Avatar
#37 TigerUnderGlass
June 14 2012, 10:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Jason Gregor

Compare him to other D-man in his pay scale and show me others who had as little success as him.

Are you ignoring me now :) (smiley face denotes kidding around)

Andrei Markov - 5.75 Myers, Tyler - 5.5 James Wisniewski - 5.5 Byfuglien (as a defenseman) - 5.2 Wade Redden - 6.5 Dion Phaneuf - 6.5 We can probably expect to add Wideman and Garrison to the list as well.

also:

Also Mario only missed playoffs in his first FOUR years, not six

huh?

JW Wrote:

Mario Lemieux made the playoffs once in his first six seasons;
Avatar
#38 TigerUnderGlass
June 14 2012, 10:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Cody anderson wrote:

Another question. If we signed Stoll for a reasonable contract and traded Belanger who would you put on the 3rd line/4th line?

If I was unable to trade Horcoff and his salary I would keep him on the third line and put Stoll on the 4th line where that physicality is even more important.

The only problem with this is that the Edmonton Oilers do not believe in having good hockey players on the fourth line.

Avatar
#39 Cody anderson
June 14 2012, 10:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

blueorangekoolaid........OH my god.......Thank god you are not the GM. This would be a horrible trade!!!!!!!!

We are short Dman and you want to trade one of our best plus our second line centre for an unproven Dman that in all likelyhood hwill take 5 years to develop and may nver be as good as Smid.

This is crazy talk! Unless they met with Schultz first and he agreed to sign this is one of the worst trades i have ever heard of.

His rights could easily be gotten for Omark, or another faltering prospect and a conditional draft pick (most likely 2nd or 3rd round)

Avatar
#40 rindog
June 14 2012, 10:12AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Gregs,

The problem is...

At the time, the coach overused alot of the "glue guys" and put them in roles they were not capable of playing.

I understand that a part of it may have been due to lack of top end talent throughout the roster, but I still feel that those guys are gone because the coach didnt set them up for success.

Avatar
#41 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 10:12AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Eddie Edmonton

One team wins the Cup every year, so if a team loses the final, they aren't good. As if.

Bourque went to two finals, and had Bruins in playoffs every year, 19 of 21 seasons.

Visnovsky missed playoffs 7 years in a row. He played most minutes on his team most of the those years. He had chance to influence game more than most, and he didn't do enough to get them even into the playoffs.

The reason Lubo was traded for them, and for Whitney is because he isn't as valuable as people think. History shows it. He doesn't help teams win consistently.

Avatar
#42 blueorangekoolaid
June 14 2012, 10:17AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Cody anderson

6th overall is there too. I'm not saying it's a no-brainer but I think there is merit to it. and I figured including J. Schultz would absolutely include working out a deal with him first. I know Smid and Gags have quality but I think L. Schenn could play Smid's game too and he's 5 years younger. So having 5th and 6th overall plus Schenn and J. Schultz under contract is worth that price to me. It's all good if you wouldn't. Neither of us are GM, just a discussion starter.

Avatar
#43 Cody anderson
June 14 2012, 10:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Tiger, I don't think it is that we don't believe it as much as we have no depth.

we simply do not have 4 lines of NHL players or 7 NHL defensemen.

We do require some big bodied grit on the 4th line and in my opinion a willing feared enforcer that can at least be dressed against certain teams. Our good players are small enough we do need some protection for them. The problem is we have been signing or promoting a full line of AHL, or enforcer, or castoffs that are not capable skillwise of keeping up. One player you can live with.....but a full 5 is way too much of a liability.

Cap room always comes into play as well. If Stoll or another physical but reasonably good player would sign an affordable contract I have to believe the Oil would jump at it....even for their 4th, otherwise there is more trouble than we all believe.

Avatar
#44 TigerUnderGlass
June 14 2012, 10:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

One team wins the Cup every year, so if a team loses the final, they aren't good. As if.

Bourque went to two finals, and had Bruins in playoffs every year, 19 of 21 seasons.

Visnovsky missed playoffs 7 years in a row. He played most minutes on his team most of the those years. He had chance to influence game more than most, and he didn't do enough to get them even into the playoffs.

The reason Lubo was traded for them, and for Whitney is because he isn't as valuable as people think. History shows it. He doesn't help teams win consistently.

It still sounds like you are saying one of two things:

1. #1 Defenseman should be able to take team to playoffs regardless of team; or

2. #2 defensemen don't help teams win games.

I know this isn't what you mean, but these are the implications of the arguments you are making.

You can probably stop with all the "#1 D-men do this," and "#1 D do that." Whether he is a #1 or #2 is completely irrelevant to the question at hand. I am perfectly happy to accept that a team would be better if he was their #2 than if he was their #1, because it means they are a better team.

It still doesn't mean that as a #2 he is less valuable than pluggers.

Avatar
#45 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 10:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@TigerUnderGlass

I sent a response earlier..WTH...

Markov got to 2nd round of playoff four times. Redden went to Cup final. Myers has never made $5.5 million yet, contract kicks in this year, but nice try.

Lubo made $5.6 when cap was $54 million, Wiz got his awful deal when cap was $64. He's also only had it for one year.

Byfuglien has only had one year at his contract. So a tad early to compare him to a guy who has done nothing for five years.

So you want to put Phaneuf in category with Lubo that is fine, but Phaneuf has already made playoffs more than Lubo.

If you can show me how Lubo is a difference maker I'd like to see it.

He's overrated.

Avatar
#46 TigerUnderGlass
June 14 2012, 10:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Cody anderson

The problem is we have been signing or promoting a full line of AHL, or enforcer, or castoffs that are not capable skillwise of keeping up. One player you can live with.....but a full 5 is way too much of a liability.

We have a winner.

There have been better players available for the fourth line but they choose instead to do what you just outlined above.

Why is that?

Avatar
#47 Cody anderson
June 14 2012, 10:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I would not even consider the 5th and Schenn for the 1st. If they did Gardiner Shcenn and the 5th then we have a deal. At very least i would want Gardiner, 5th, and another pick.

I think in time if we got lucky and developed well Schenn may be similar to Smid, but he is a long way off right now. Also Smid improved a tonne this year. Who knows if he has reached his ceiling. I would not consider trading Smid for the 5th pick or any defenseman in this draft.

Smid wants to stay here. He loves Edmonton and I believe will take a hometown discount to stay long term. If Schultz would sign here if we dealt for him, Then we would have an awful good chance signing him on July 1. I would have to think a much better chance with a stronger team by not giving up good current assets for potential future assets.

Avatar
#48 TigerUnderGlass
June 14 2012, 10:29AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

I sent a response earlier..WTH...

Markov got to 2nd round of playoff four times. Redden went to Cup final. Myers has never made $5.5 million yet, contract kicks in this year, but nice try.

Lubo made $5.6 when cap was $54 million, Wiz got his awful deal when cap was $64. He's also only had it for one year.

Byfuglien has only had one year at his contract. So a tad early to compare him to a guy who has done nothing for five years.

So you want to put Phaneuf in category with Lubo that is fine, but Phaneuf has already made playoffs more than Lubo.

If you can show me how Lubo is a difference maker I'd like to see it.

He's overrated.

Ooops, did I miss it or did it get lost? Sorry if I missed it.

Redden was so successful he's out of the league.

Markov - a few second round appearances is hardly a massive success.

Wiz, Buf, and Myers - Did you just move the goalposts? Doesn't matter. All three were given the deals they were given because they were deemed to be worth the money.

Avatar
#49 mayorpoop
June 14 2012, 10:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

anyone have streaming info on Euro soccer. Crotia vs Italy.

help a member out.

Avatar
#50 Jason Gregor
June 14 2012, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@TigerUnderGlass

No, somehow it didn't post...Wanye is dead. Myers hasn't made the money yet, how can you say he's in same boat. If he makes playoffs next year and wins around, he's already ahead.

You can't compare a guy who has yet to make the actual money.

And in four years, when Wiz and Buff have had five years at that coin, if they haven't done squat I will put them in that category, but can't say they are same as him.

Also Wiz and Buff will kill penalties, and be physical down low. Lubo was never that guy. He's one-dimensional.

Comments are closed for this article.