Would Jake Gardiner be a good fit for Edmonton?

Jonathan Willis
October 09 2013 09:47AM

So the Jake Gardiner rumours have started up again. CBC’s Elliotte Friedman reports that the 23-year-old defenceman is a topic of conversation between the Leafs and other NHL teams, and given his difficulties getting ice-time from Toronto head coach Randy Carlyle that makes a certain amount of sense.

Does it make sense for the Oilers to be interested?

The Edmonton End

It just might make sense for the Oilers.

Some would argue that, because the Oilers have approximately a million defencemen split between the NHL and the AHL. And they might have a point: while the Oilers’ left side defence is relatively weak at the moment, prospects like Darnell Nurse and Oscar Klefbom and Martin Marincin all play the position. Given enough time, things should work themselves out, and as to the interim that’s what Ladislav Smid and Nick Schultz and Andrew Ference are for.

The case for is pretty straight-forward, though: Gardiner not only has strong potential, but moved out of Carlyle’s system it’s not crazy to think he’s a solid top-four option right now. Gardiner had a solid NHL rookie campaign in 2011-12, playing 21:35 per game for Toronto. Last year he had to wait for his shot, but he was close to the point-per-game mark in the AHL and delivered strong two-way play in 12 regular season games with the Maple Leafs and six more in the playoffs. This is a guy who is ready for a significant role now, and he certainly fits Craig MacTavish’s vision of a mobile defence corps that can also move the puck.

The Toronto End

Here’s how Elliotte Friedman assessed the return the Leafs might be looking for in his report:

If the Maple Leafs do decide to do it, it's going to be for a young asset or assets. So, you have to look at teams with talented young players.

James Mirtle of the Globe and Mail wrote on this topic too. The full article is here, but the gist of the argument is that the Leafs aren’t really a Randy Carlyle team on defence because they lack both physical players and shutdown types. Unfortunately for Toronto, they don’t really have the money to add that kind of player, so instead they have to settle for youth.

A Trade?

Toronto still needs defenders, and Edmonton would need to move some out, but the problem is that aside from Nurse (who can reasonably be excluded from trade discussions) they don’t exactly have a bunch of physical shutdown types they can move; David Musil might be the only guy who qualifies and he likely isn’t good enough to be the centerpiece of a trade with the Leafs. If it’s a Gardiner-specific issue, the Oilers could offer a bigger guy like Martin Marincin (who has a lot of the same skills) or unsigned defender Dillon Simpson, but these are ‘more of the same’ type moves. If not for the money, a guy like Nick Schultz might appeal (as might Ladislav Smid, though the Oilers may prefer to hang on to him), but perhaps that could be worked around if the Oilers took back a contract (such as Nikolai Kulemin).

Still, it’s hard to construct a plausible scenario that would appeal to both teams, so while it might make sense for the Oilers to be interested it’s difficult to see how they get a deal done.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 CM
October 09 2013, 10:04AM
Trash it!
43
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Could we build something around Klefbom?

Avatar
#2 madjam
October 09 2013, 10:50AM
Trash it!
38
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Gardiner can be part of trade for Yak only if Reimer or Bernier are included . Dump Lababarra in package .

Avatar
#3 washed up
October 09 2013, 01:33PM
Trash it!
34
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

Yak to Nashville for Weber,Seth jones, and Rinne. Pull the trigger MacT.

Avatar
#4 Rama Lama
October 09 2013, 10:42AM
Trash it!
25
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Giving up any of our high skilled youth for a softer type defensemen would in my mind be a panic move. We all know that Darnell Nurse will be playing for this team next year and that we have more defensemen than we do playing time.

Trade for no one unless they play centre, are big & mean, with some assembelence of skill.

What we need is goaltending, everyone know that, even Dubby. He is a great back up but we need a starter, someone with balls of steel who can make a save to win a game. I would try and lure Kipper back from retirement........the guy retired way too early.

Avatar
#5 washed up
October 09 2013, 01:43PM
Trash it!
24
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

What! 2 trash's for my Awsome trade idea, must be flames fans. I guess you could throw in Omark and labarbra,to even things out.

Avatar
#6 madjam
October 09 2013, 01:23PM
Trash it!
21
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

Oilers trying to get Weber here , but negotiations are tenuous as he does not know Weber or not he wants to play here . When might OKC get a victory ? 0-2 .

Avatar
#7 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
October 09 2013, 11:46AM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

Might as well renovate the blueline and goaltending during yet another outside looking in season.

Subtracting N.Schultz, Smid and Grabeshkov, while adding Gardiner, Dan Girardi (2014 UFA) and Darnell Nurse next season would save the Oilers about 3-4 mill next year. Let Eakins make that call on Gardiner, he would know all about Jake. Musil and Omark in exchange......done!

7 million for Smid and N.Schultz.....yikes.

Avatar
#8 washed up
October 09 2013, 02:35PM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
pkam wrote:

David Poile has to be heavily stoned to agree to that trade.

And even Poile agree to that trade, we don't have enough salary cap.

Yak and Jones will even out. Weber and Rinne total about 15M. Omark and Labarbera total 1.6M, we need to add at least 13M to stay under the cap. We will need to throw in Hemsky (5M), Gagner (4.8M), then N. Schultz or Smid (3.5M) as well, just to make your trade proposal to be legal.

Not really. I think the oilers have about 5 mil in cap space. So lets throw in Gagner, and Shultz. Keep Hemmer and offer him a contact extension at the end of the year. Arcobello can be second line center. Switch Labrabra for Dubby. Good to go.

Avatar
#9 washed up
October 09 2013, 03:10PM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
oilerjed wrote:

And forget the fact that this would mean that we are giving up on a 24 year old player that is already less then 200pts behind hemsky and catching up quick. With no injury history mind you.

I don't know how anybody could think that signing Gagner to an extension was a good move for the Oilers. Total stupidity on MacT's part.

Avatar
#10 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
October 09 2013, 12:18PM
Trash it!
17
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

I could see how many outsiders could view Yakupov as an extra asset. The way Eakins has used Yakupov could easily be considered indifferent. 3rd line minutes with cameo pp opportunities. Dallas certainly doesn't appear to be a fan from what we've all seen so far. This move alone may have cost the Oilers a victory over the Jets.

Time to get out the blender. 1st) RNH between Hall and Yakupov. 2nd) Eberle between Perron and Hemsky. 3rd) Gordon between Smyth and Arcobello. 4th) Acton between Gazdic and Brown.

Now that the Hall to center experiment has failed. How about giving Jordan, who expressed a willingness to give it a try an opportunity. Putting a pure shooter (64) with a playmaker (93) deserves a good long look. Send Arcobello back to the AHL. Get Eager up here to take his spot on that 3rd line RW.

Avatar
#11 washed up
October 09 2013, 02:37PM
Trash it!
17
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@oilerjed

What team would trade a Top 10 goal scorer for Yakupov?

Avatar
#12 washed up
October 09 2013, 10:57AM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Whatta Mike wrote:

I agree with the guys ahead of me in saying no to getting Gardiner. Although he has skill he is too much more of the same the Oilers have now....no meanness and he lacks big size to easily push out guys away from the net...which is exactly what the Oilers now need for defence.

The Oilers have puck moving guys on the team now with Petry, J. Schultz, Belov, Grebeshkov, even Ference (to a degree) and then there is Potter as well. In the AHL... the Oilers have Klefbom, Gernat, Marancin, Fedun, Hunt, etc, who are mainly bigger (except Hunt) and all can move the puck/pass it up forward easily.

If the Oilers want another defenceman he has to be a type top 1/2 guy or a very good skating big/heavy, mean, tough hard hitting SOB who lets the other team be afraid...very afraid.... in other words a type of Weber, Pronger, Subban, and/or even a Jacob Trouba kid.

BTW, the Oilers do have one top 1/2 defenceman in the future (like Trouba fo the Jets) who is big, mean, has excellent skills and can skate awesome....and his name is Nurse...Darnel Nurse.

So I say no to getting Gardiner.

That being said, if your MacT do you call up the Jets and see if their interested in a Yakupov for Trouba straight across. I think this trade could make sense for both teams. I could see a pair of him and Nurse drastically changing the complexion of the oilers defense.

Avatar
#13 Spoils
October 09 2013, 10:58AM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

trashed! ignore the long post- my point is:

watching Pronger march us to game 7 should point out the value of a true top guy. so basically you just have to tie for the half game he doesn't play.

if Klef-Nurse-JSchultz isn't going to do it, we should make the trade now while they have potential value - and we should be happy to give up one of our star forwards.

Stud D is that valuable.

Would Nashville make a move?

Avatar
#14 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
October 09 2013, 12:43PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@Jonathan Willis

While we're talking Toronto...

How was it Kessel got an 8 yr deal when that was supposedly limited to teams whom originally drafted the player? Thought he was limited to 7 since he was drafted by Boston and not Toronto.

Avatar
#15 washed up
October 09 2013, 03:38PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
oilerjed wrote:

What was wrong with the signing? If we hadnt signed Gags who would you have replaced him with?

Grabovski. Does everything Gagner does, and would have cost 1.8mil less.

Avatar
#16 bdiddy18
October 09 2013, 10:35AM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Allowing 15 GA in three games how could you not be considering a trade on D.

if MAC T is already looking..then kudos for addressing it before it becomes a nightmare... with Tambo he'd wait until next year to address it.

Avatar
#17 The Oilers Shot Clock
October 09 2013, 01:17PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@916oiler

If Yak was on the table, we could get a lot more than that. If a gun was to my head and I had to trade the kid, I'd send him to Washington for Carlson and Wilson. Carlson is locked in at 3.9 untill 17/18 without a no trade clause. I would consider that. Washington would consider that.

Avatar
#18 Spoils
October 09 2013, 10:30AM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

I'd be leery of Gardiner. The Oilers have enough non-physical D-men. They need to add a puck mover, but one with size and strength, which Nurse should be.

I understand the argument he'd be an upgrade, potentially, over N.Schultz, but long term I think Nurse and Klefbom because of their size and skillset will be better to fill in holes on the backend.

If Leafs want to trade him for a prospect then I'd seriously look at it, but in Toronto they speculated about Yakupov. Seriously. Laughable.

There has been a lot of chatter about the millions of bottom 4D we have. As much as I loved the 4 goal 3rd period, we aren't contending this year.

Still, I believe it is time to mortgage the future (draft picks and players that won't be on the team in 3years). Trading guys that have potential before they underwhelm is one of the great ways a GM can add value.

Aren't we expecting the D to look like this when we win a cup? Klefbom was 1st team allstar at the WJC (so in the company of Alex Pietrangelo Erik Karlsson PK Subban Drew Doughty Kris Letang Ryan Suter). Nurse was a "young larry robinson" at camp.

Nurse- Klefbom Schultz- Petry Smid- (Marincin/Simpson/Gernat etc.)

If Klefbom is not the #1 guy let's package him up and trade him, but to get a bona fide #1 like a Pronger, we'll be forced to give stuff up (like maybe even a Gag, Yak or Ebs).

Priority this year should be making the call on whether or not Nurse/Schultz/Klefbom can be first team NHL All Stars norris winning cup champs.

goaltending and puzzle pieces(Gazdic(s) for example) are the trades we need to make immediately.

Avatar
#19 madjam
October 09 2013, 12:29PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

MacT. run out of viable trade options unless he exposes top 6 youngsters . Same problem Tams had . Coaching making little to no difference , which should not be much of a surprise . MacT. had one good trade in Perron -at least it appears to be for now , which is good for us . Top 6 either gets to another level , or we lounge again in cellar of league .

Avatar
#20 The Oilers Shot Clock
October 09 2013, 01:17PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@916oiler

If Yak was on the table, we could get a lot more than that. If a gun was to my head and I had to trade the kid, I'd send him to Washington for Carlson and Wilson. Carlson is locked in at 3.9 untill 17/18 without a no trade clause. I would consider that. Washington would consider that.

Avatar
#21 Jay Gray
October 09 2013, 09:53AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
45
cheers

No

Avatar
#22 Will
October 09 2013, 10:22AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
30
cheers

Is there any validity to these, or is this just Bob Mac speculating on how the Oilers need better defence. Because from my perspective, everyone seems to be going off that without getting any word from Mac T on whether he is looking to make this deal.

Because it really seems like TSN is just trying to make news. I thought our D was outstanding against Winnipeg, Dubnyk single handily lost that game for the Oilers. Vancouver I can't really speak to but I would be surprised if it had nothing to do with the fact Hall and Arcebello were up against Henrick and Kesler. As for New Jersey, yes. I mean maybe our D is still struggling a little bit, but compared to last year where we'd be hemmed in for ages, and couldn't get the puck out or make an outlet pass, it's not even close.

Point being we've won one game of three, we still have key players injured. Belov was always going to take a little bit of time to adjust. And we need our goalies to make some of the saves they've been giving up. Take away Dubnyks really bad goals and suddenly we've given away 10 goals in 3 games, and won at least two of them.

As for Gardiner in Edmonton. Meh, I would rather give our defence a bit more time to see what they can do.

Avatar
#23 Hammers
October 09 2013, 10:37AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Face it if we want an upgrade we have to trade Smid . The most you get for N.Schultz is a 2nd rd pick at the deadline .Belov goes with Petry . Trade Smid + Fedun for Coburn @ Philly OR Smid + 2AHL players for Tyutin or that level of player.I like Smid but he is the best answer in an upgrade trade for a "D" . Agree that Gardiner is not the answer.

Avatar
#24 Geoff
October 09 2013, 10:38AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

To state the obvious if Edmonton trades for a Dman it's gotta be a top D man with size and defensive shutdown ability. That kind of trade would involve one of our awesome forwards which would be one of Yakupov and Eberle. Top D guy and a 3rd line RW for Eb/Yak and one of our younger Dmen would be most likely in my opinion and MacT said he wanted to be bold so it's probably a likely scenario if the guys can't tighten up their defense :(.

Avatar
#25 DOMINATOR
October 09 2013, 11:28AM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Jay Gray

THATS ANOTHER NO . HOW ABOUT CAM WARD NEEDING A NEW ADDRESS .

Avatar
#26 madjam
October 09 2013, 04:03PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Hall, Eberle , Gagner , Petry ,second round pick and Dubnyk for Toews , Keith , Seabrooke and good old Khabby back . Now to find a number one goalie .

Avatar
#27 madjam
October 09 2013, 05:57PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Oiler Al wrote:

First I think Leafs are giving up to early on Gardnair,unless he has health issues, ON the other hand why would Oilers need him, we have the other pea that came from the same pod, in Jr. Schultz . I think one of these is enough, even though Schultz is much better , but they both came from the same school...and system. Kinda shows on the ice today.

Oilers need a heavy , hitting D man , that can skate. PS SMid is a poor imitation of one.

We already have one , but they sent him back to juniors because of the money and cap issue . Nurse is the one I speak of .

Avatar
#28 Jason Gregor
October 09 2013, 09:59AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
85
cheers

I'd be leery of Gardiner. The Oilers have enough non-physical D-men. They need to add a puck mover, but one with size and strength, which Nurse should be.

I understand the argument he'd be an upgrade, potentially, over N.Schultz, but long term I think Nurse and Klefbom because of their size and skillset will be better to fill in holes on the backend.

If Leafs want to trade him for a prospect then I'd seriously look at it, but in Toronto they speculated about Yakupov. Seriously. Laughable.

Avatar
#29 Oilers need Ogie Ogilthorpe!
October 09 2013, 10:32AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers

Sorry, double posted. Real comment is next. I feel shame

Avatar
#30 Oilers need Ogie Ogilthorpe!
October 09 2013, 10:32AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

I agree with everything JG said. I don't see how we improve by adding 3-4 type, non-bruising defenders. From where I sit, any moves right now should revolve around getting bigger/tougher.

I'd also hate to give up a prospect like Musil. It sounds like he has the tools to fill a void on the team, with one key weakness. I hope the coaches and player development personnel have him working on his skating on a daily basis. Whether it's sprints after every game/practice or dry-land training, I believe players can get faster through hard work. It may take a couple of years, but if he wants an NHL shot, he's probably going to have to commit to improving his foot speed.

Last, in full agreement with Gregor about Yakupov. Trading him for a 3-4 D man is out of the question. Starting to wonder though, (can't blame JG for this idea) if we could get Bernier (+?) for yakupov, if that might be worth it. Knee jerk? Yup, but IF Dubbs isn't the answer, then we need to find a franchise goalie sooner rather than later

Oh yeah... And Omark for Weber

Avatar
#31 pkam
October 09 2013, 02:17PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
washed up wrote:

What! 2 trash's for my Awsome trade idea, must be flames fans. I guess you could throw in Omark and labarbra,to even things out.

David Poile has to be heavily stoned to agree to that trade.

And even Poile agree to that trade, we don't have enough salary cap.

Yak and Jones will even out. Weber and Rinne total about 15M. Omark and Labarbera total 1.6M, we need to add at least 13M to stay under the cap. We will need to throw in Hemsky (5M), Gagner (4.8M), then N. Schultz or Smid (3.5M) as well, just to make your trade proposal to be legal.

Avatar
#32 They're $hittie
October 09 2013, 09:53AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
63
cheers

Don't Leafs fans and Toronto media think Yak is the return?

I thought B.C. was where all the good bud was.

Avatar
#33 Whatta Mike
October 09 2013, 10:16AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers

I agree with the guys ahead of me in saying no to getting Gardiner. Although he has skill he is too much more of the same the Oilers have now....no meanness and he lacks big size to easily push out guys away from the net...which is exactly what the Oilers now need for defence.

The Oilers have puck moving guys on the team now with Petry, J. Schultz, Belov, Grebeshkov, even Ference (to a degree) and then there is Potter as well. In the AHL... the Oilers have Klefbom, Gernat, Marancin, Fedun, Hunt, etc, who are mainly bigger (except Hunt) and all can move the puck/pass it up forward easily.

If the Oilers want another defenceman he has to be a type top 1/2 guy or a very good skating big/heavy, mean, tough hard hitting SOB who lets the other team be afraid...very afraid.... in other words a type of Weber, Pronger, Subban, and/or even a Jacob Trouba kid.

BTW, the Oilers do have one top 1/2 defenceman in the future (like Trouba fo the Jets) who is big, mean, has excellent skills and can skate awesome....and his name is Nurse...Darnel Nurse.

So I say no to getting Gardiner.

Avatar
#34 Cody anderson
October 09 2013, 10:33AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

I don't see him as an upgrade in our top 4.

With the young up and comers I don't look at him unless it is a steal. Of course I would look at a trade of Musil or N Schultz for him, but one is not proven and one is too expensive.

Does not look like a fit.

Avatar
#35 madjam
October 09 2013, 11:21AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

We have to evaluate whether our top 6 (Hall, Hopkins, Eberle ,Gagner ,Yakupov and J.Schultz ) is the right mix to go forward with . So far it is looking like maybe not all of them . To much skill and little much else . Chemistry is an issue as it is very sporadic with top group . Rangers used to buy all the skill at one time , and they seldom won much .

Avatar
#36 Spoils
October 09 2013, 11:28AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Ryan2 wrote:

We shipped out a decent sized, soft, puck moving d-man in Gilbert a year and a half ago so why bring in another one to add to the pile?

It is way too early in the season to be talking about mortgaging the future. The best course of action right now is for MacT to be patient for a bit and let the team gel. There was a decent amount of turnover, another new system for the players to learn, and the team started with their top 2 centers on the IR. I did not expect the Oilers to be a playoff team this year (and stated so), and deep down I doubt that MacT did either. There are still too many pieces missing.

As far as trading the prospects, this team is still 2 years away from being a solid playoff tem let alone a cup contender, if it ever will be.Why waste young assets now on a stopgap player or two that will not make much of a difference at all? Right now the Oilers need to develop system depth (which is sorely lacking at forward) in order to fill roster holes with solid and cheap young players in the future. This is the Detroit model that has been copied in Chicago, and with Nuge, Hall and Ebs locked in longer term as cornerstones the Oilers could follow this model as well. I know that the fans are restless, but it will take two years to clean up Tambi's mismanagement of the roster, if not 3.

I am not saying Gardiner is right. I am saying we should be thinking about whether or not Klef etc. are. and not be afraid to trade while they have mystique.

I am saying we should aim to win in 3-5yrs and so trading draft picks (maybe not this year) and packages of prospects to get a puzzle piece who will fit that time frame (top goalie/#1D) makes sense to me.

I like the idea of the Detroit model, but if Edmonton is structurally challenged e.g. small market, then focusing on windows of years to win seems smart. Strikes me one of those windows is coming up.

Avatar
#37 washed up
October 09 2013, 04:11PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
pkam wrote:

Didn't the Leafs sign Grabovski to 5.5M, even 2 years ago? Gagner had 65 pts (prorated at 82 games) last season. Did Grabovski has any year more than 60 pts? If Gagner's 4.8M contract is stupid, how do you describe Grabovski's 5.5M contract?

Grabovski was a Leafs when we signed Gagner. Without a crystal ball, how do we know for sure Leafs will waive him? Do you really think the Leafs will waive him if they failed to sign Bozak? Hindsight is easy, isn't it?

If the Leafs didn't waive him, are you going to trade Gagner for him?

Even you believe the Leafs is going to waive him, how do you know for sure he will sign with us at 3.0M?

Grabovski, got bought out around the 4th of July. Gagner didn't sign his extension until the end of July. I'm just using the number he signed in Washington. P.S, no way Gagner gets 65 points in a season.

Avatar
#38 washed up
October 09 2013, 04:12PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@madjam

I like your trade proposal. BOLD

Avatar
#39 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
October 09 2013, 09:36PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@djc

Guess I sure hit that nail on the head when i mentioned the bitterness thing, eh.

You're living proof of that old adage. It's best a fool remain silent, than speak and remove all doubt. Be well loser.

Avatar
#40 Cody anderson
October 09 2013, 10:36AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

@Oilers need Ogie Ogilthorpe!

Unless a top young goalie prospect falls in our lap I think you have to give Dubnyk the benefit of the doubt and let him work himself out of the funk he is in.

2 games in he has not looked like the goalie he has shown himself to be the last couple of years. Way too early to give up major assets for something that may not be an improvement over what we already have.

Avatar
#41 WhattaMike
October 09 2013, 11:03AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

I also want to add to my post earlier (#5) in that the Oilers do have Phillip Larsen as well who is even better i think than Gardiner at this stage and he is a little bigger too and only 23 yrs old. Then there is Dillon Simpson as well who is doing very well in his university league.

The Oilers do need more accent/accessory pieces to the team now.... and on defence... it is of adding big heavy tough mean guys who can skate well, hit hard, and have very reasonable passing abilities to move the puck.

N. Schultz will be leaving this yr in my opinion as he is old(er) and his limited type skill can be replaced by a cheaper younger very good player/prospect in the Oilers system (Davidson, Musil, etc).

Gardiner does not fit the bill as being needed or better than what the Oilers have on the team and/or in the system.

Last is that TSN and/or the Leafs are LOONY TUNES to think Yakupov is of equal type trade material to what they want or have.

First is that Hemsky is 30 yrs old and in his last big yr contract ($5 mil) and as good as he looks right now, Yak is 20 yrs only and he is going to replace him shortly as he learns more. Yak even has a better harder shot than Hemsky, is as fast (if not faster) as Hemsky, can score goals better than Hemsky, etc. he even hits more as much than Ales and I think he is a better PP.

Example is that Hemsky has only 1 hattrick since he joined the league (one in 10/11 yrs) and Yak got his first already in his first season. Case closed.

He will also need to be paid as like Hall, Ebs, RNH soon and that is where the money from Hemsky is gonna go IMO.

So those who suggest trading for Yakupov to the Leafs...for Gardiner or Bernier???? Go back to sleep and have more other dreams....

Avatar
#42 They're $hittie
October 09 2013, 11:44AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Two comments this week and I am supporting 94-4 for a total +90 on my Dalkin score.

Watch all the trashes come in to wreck it now.

LOL.

NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE

Avatar
#43 pkam
October 09 2013, 11:53AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Who comes up with this joke of trading Yak straight for Gardiner should has his brain examined.

The only Leafs forward with similar quality of Yak is Kessel. You can argue Yak is unproven but he definitely has better potential than Kessel. Yak's rookie season stat is about as good as Kessel's 3rd season, the year that Leafs paid a big ransom to acquire him from Boston. Yak will probably rival Kessel current stats in a year or 2 and move ahead of him after that. Kessel is coming out of his RFA and get 8M next year. Yak still has 2 years left in his ELC and 4 years of RFA.

The Oilers defenders with similar quality of Gardiner are J. Schultz and Petry. I believe the Leafs wanted J. Schultz but the Ducks refused so they settled for Gardiner.

Does he think the Leafs will trade Kessel straight for J. Schultz? If he doesn't think so, how does it make any sense for the Oilers to trade Yak, a better version of Kessel, straight for Gardiner, a similar player to J. Schultz.

If they want Yak, simple, 2 1st rounders and a 2nd rounder. Gardiner may get the Leafs a late 1st rounder. So Gardiner plus a 1st and 2nd rounder for Yak, if we are interested in Gardiner.

Avatar
#44 Manfly
October 09 2013, 12:25PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

if we had a chance to get Jake Gardiner here, i'd still like to see the Oilers do it, though he may not be exactly what they are looking for (Shea Weber?), still very talented. and we'd probably indeed need to take another contract from the Leafs and make it a multi player deal. if it cost us Martin Marincin and David Musil and whatever else the Leafs wanted that the Oil were willing to part with, then i'm OK with it.

Avatar
#45 washed up
October 09 2013, 02:56PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

@Next up, is Connor McJesus.

Total sarcasm. 90% of the comments on this site are mind boggling. Although there are some on here that make some really good points. It's just funny how lots want to change the dynamic of the team because there is to much of the same thing, but as soon as someone puts one of the skilled forwards not named Omark in a trade, said person must be on crack.

Avatar
#46 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
October 09 2013, 04:43PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

@OilClog

If you survived the Gretzky deal in 88, i'm sure you'd live to tell the tale of a Yakupov deal. It doesn't get any worse than that Gretzky deal. Time tested and true Oiler fans have seen their share of deals where the best player in the deal was always leaving this city.

I can really see why the Harry and djc types are just so bitter nowadays. They've got nuthin!

Avatar
#47 OilClog
October 09 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

What did the Oilers give up to get Pronger... And here ON is suggesting giving up one of the top talents on this team to get another Pronger... How do we get a GM that pull a trade off like that first Pronger trade again.. This place can make heads explode, ridiculous.

Avatar
#48 CaptainLander
October 09 2013, 10:17AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

@CM

I think Klefbom (living to potential say by next year) has a skill set more to what the Oil need vs Gardiner. I think he could bring more defensively then Gardiner. If things are not wherr the need to be with Klefbom by the end of this year then I consider it.

Avatar
#49 Archaeologuy
October 09 2013, 10:36AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers

Gardiner would be nice to get for peanuts (not gonna happen), but the Oilers need someone better than top 4 to get a real upgrade IMO.

They arent missing 2nd pairing players, they are missing top pairing guys.

Avatar
#50 Cody anderson
October 09 2013, 10:39AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

@bdiddy18

It's 3 games in, and the goalies have not looked good. I am confident this is the best D we have had in years. There are certainly some kinks to work out. New players, new coach, new system, but I think you have to give them 10-15 games to work it out.

Comments are closed for this article.