The dreaded vote of confidence

Jonathan Willis
November 15 2013 09:42AM

Yesterday, Craig MacTavish spoke to the media about the Edmonton Oilers’ performance. Among other items, he made it clear that he still has confidence in head coach Dallas Eakins.

After uttering similar lines during his availability and stressing the need for stability behind the bench, MacTavish told Bob Stauffer of Oilers Now that he “really couldn’t be happier with the coaching.”

The Vote of Confidence

The interesting thing about the managerial vote of confidence is that it often seems to precede the firing of said coach in short order. There are, I think, a couple of reasons for that.

The biggest is that managers don’t have to give coaches with good records a vote of confidence. Reporters don’t generally ask whether guys like Jon Cooper or Joel Quenneville are going to get fired; it’s obvious that they’re safe. Columnists don’t speculate on the safety of Todd McLellan or Dan Bylsma, at least not when those teams are winning, because there’s no question that the results support their continued employment.

So by the time the manager is in a position to opine on his head coach, there’s something in the record that suggests said head coach should be fired. And as a general rule, the media will always be ready to fire the coach before management is, which means that even when the coach is going to be fired there’s often a period of time when the media thinks he could be and the manager wants to hang on a little longer to see if the coach can turn things around.

The other reason is a simple trick of memory: we tend to remember the contradicition of a general manager supporting his coach and then firing him a week or two later, while we don't necessarily remember the close call that turned out okay.

Eakins

The thing keeping Dallas Eakins safe right now isn’t necessarily Craig MacTavish’s public statement, and it certainly isn’t the record or the underlying performance of his team (both of which are awful at the moment). It’s history.

Too many coaches in Edmonton have fallen by the wayside. The traditional point of reference is Sam Gagner; he’s just started his seventh season with the Oilers and he’s on his fifth head coach. It's ridiculous. 

There has been too much turnover, and other things need to change before the coaching does.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#101 OilCanFan
November 15 2013, 12:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Spydyr wrote:

I agree Arcobello should be playing ahead of Gagner.

Arcobello has been the most pleasant surprise this year.He does play with heart .That being said he is just too small.Moving forward where would you play him.If you have Nuge as your first line center I would like some size with the second line center.Arcobello is not a third of fourth line center.He just does not fit IMHO moving forward.

What they really need is the elusive 3-1 trade with for once in decades the best player coming here.

I don't mind him on the second line or third line depending on what you have. I'd prefer 3 lines of offense maybe with Gordon on the 4th. If we could replace Arcobello with the same thing but bigger, sure; size, heart, and skill should always trump just heart and skill. The issue I see is who will take all the little guys and trade us a bigger Arcobello type?

Avatar
#102 Smokey
November 15 2013, 01:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
Rama Lama wrote:

Just found out Arcabello is sitting..........our most solid player both offensively and defensively, and physically will not be playing.

Yea, coaching is not our problem!

The only thing he hasn't done lately is score. His ice time has gone buy buy after he potted the game winner cause they keep force feeding Gagner time and opportunity. What did Arco do to deserve the benching?

Eakins better not say one thing about accountability or my head will explode. This is about a paycheck and coach who's blind.

Avatar
#103 2004Z06
November 15 2013, 01:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Todd wrote:

I have gone on rants here about how we need to stop going to the games. Its the ONLY way. I haven't been to 1 game all year, and will not spend $1 on a ticket.

But I was just offered free tix tonight. I took them. I can't help it. I'm a recovering addict. My sponsor wasn't around, and I took the hit. HELP ME!

We have all fallen off the wagon a time or too....Stay strong!

Avatar
#104 #Six Rings
November 15 2013, 01:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

The coach consistently talks about accountability. Earning icetime. Deserving your minutes, etc.

And yet, Gagner and Acton are in the line-up tonight and Arcobello isn't. Going by recent history, Gagner will very likely be matched up against the Sharks top line with the predictable results sure to follow.

It's becoming very difficult to take Eakins seriously.

Avatar
#105 Admiralmark
November 15 2013, 01:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

There's no question it's the years of Tambi/Lowe tanking philosophy that has the team so deprived of talent and engrained losing mentality. I do not blame Eakins for that. But Eakins said players would get play time based on merit. So playing Gagner and/or Acton over Arcobello is the opposite of what he said. Should move Gagner to wing where he ALWAYS should of been playing.

Avatar
#106 #Six Rings
November 15 2013, 02:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

"Gagner was on pace for 65 pts last year and finished 34th in scoring for F so yes he's a legit #2 C. "

A "legit" second line center should also have some semblance of defensive awareness and abilities to go along with offensive skills. Does watching the play while standing still make him a "legit" second line center?

Not only has Gagner never topped 50 points in the NHL, after seven seasons he still has the defensive acumen of a bantam player.

To suggest Sam Gagner is a "legit" second line center based on projected point totals for one shortened season while ignoring all of the glaring deficiencies in his defensive game that have been there since day one is nothing short of intentional ignorance.

Avatar
#107 The Swarm
November 15 2013, 04:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

I would be the first to admit this year, thus far, has been a diaster, but I keep hearing how the Oilers re-build has been 8-years. Where did this "8-year" thing originate from? The first obvious observation is that they were 1 game away from winning the cup in 2006, which is 7-years ago, so were they re-building as they went to the final too? It is safe to say 1-year after almost winning the cup, they were not re-building, which would have been the 2006/07 season.  The following two seasons they had winning records and still had the core from their 2005/06 roster (Hemsky, Horcoff, Pisani, Roloson, etc.., with the exception of Pronger and other spare parts).  I wouldn't constitute these years as re-building years either, as they were still chasing the latest free agents and were not focused on the draft at all (largely due to Lowe trying to repeat his success with acquiring Pronger, Roloson, Pecka, and Samsonov).

That brings us to the 2009/10 season, when clearly they began to stop chasing free agents (Vanek, Hossa, Nylander, Heatley) and build the team again through the draft.  That would be 4 years ago, so the 8-year re-build is "just a little bit outside".

The blue print for the shift in strategy was the Hawks, who last qualified for the playoffs in 2001/02 prior to their break out season in 2008/2009, which is 7-years.  It's interesting to note when the key pieces of their Stanley Cup team were drafted or signed:

2002 - Keith drafted  2003 - Seabrook/Byfuglien drafted 2006 - Toews drafted 2007  - Kane drafted 2008 - Campbell signed 2009 - Hawks have first winning record since 01/02 2010 - Hawks win the Cup

So you can see, it doesn't happen overnight.

Avatar
#108 match16
November 15 2013, 04:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
Lowe Expectations wrote:

This team simply put has too many perimeter players. Not that players like this can't be valuable to a team, this one is overloaded with them. For me, other than Hall & RNH every other player on the current roster is available for trade. It's time to start the overhaul of this roster, as the way it's currently built will never be successful.

I don't know why the management of the Oilers would be so afraid of trading some assets. One of the reasons you draft the most talented player available rather than for positional need is that the more talent a player has the more value in return you'll receive.

This. That 5 on 3 vs Dallas was a perfect example. ALL 5 guys were on the perimiter... Even though Hall fed Perron with a nice pass in the slot, Lehtonen had clear vision and was able to easily snag the puck out of the air. Need some bodies in front...

Avatar
#109 birdieman
November 15 2013, 04:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

@75ers

I think Tom Renny had these kids on the right track. Oh have you heard messier is back in the fold...go figure.

Avatar
#110 Johnnydapunk
November 15 2013, 08:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

They just mentioned that Bryzgalov has been shelled for 5 goals in 27 shots in his first AHL game, oh dear....

Avatar
#111 Pouzar99
November 15 2013, 08:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

In MacT's own words - "If you have to ask the question, you know the answer."

Avatar
#112 Bryzarro World
November 16 2013, 05:21AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
2004Z06 wrote:

Free tickets or not, I have not and will not go to a game. That is the main problem here. People bitching about change at the top yet still selling out the building.

And before the Tier one fans comment, no one is asking you to give up your season tix, just boycott a game or two.

The images on T.V. of a half empty building (normally standing room only) combined with the loss in parking/concession/merchandise revenue would send a very clear message to ownership.

Further to that a petition was put forward to have Lowe fired. Last count 58 signatures!!!

Have yet to hear the "fire Lowe" chants reverberating through my television speakers as well. Has anyone walked into the Oilers office demanding a refund?

Step up, or shut up!

Gave mine up 2 years ago. I've had them for 14 years and they were in the family since 1980. Had enough of this garbage. 10g plus a year for excuses is more than I can handle. I'll travel more instead of staring at a screen and wishing I played hockey.

More to life than watching a bunch of chickens running around without heads men...

Avatar
#113 Bryzarro World
November 16 2013, 05:48AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
#Six Rings wrote:

"Gagner was on pace for 65 pts last year and finished 34th in scoring for F so yes he's a legit #2 C. "

A "legit" second line center should also have some semblance of defensive awareness and abilities to go along with offensive skills. Does watching the play while standing still make him a "legit" second line center?

Not only has Gagner never topped 50 points in the NHL, after seven seasons he still has the defensive acumen of a bantam player.

To suggest Sam Gagner is a "legit" second line center based on projected point totals for one shortened season while ignoring all of the glaring deficiencies in his defensive game that have been there since day one is nothing short of intentional ignorance.

Looks like Zarny just got fed its lunch... lmfao!!

Avatar
#114 Murray
November 16 2013, 05:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@75ers

OK the way I see it is the oilers have drafted very poorly, The picks they made suck, can not play together with no chemistry, and that is the coaches fault , thanks

Avatar
#115 Hammer
November 16 2013, 09:22AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Option# 1 Oilers trade Gagner, Hemsky, 1st round for Weber

Option#2 Oilers trade Gagner, Hemsky, Eberle for Weber

Lets wait and see!!!

Avatar
#116 Dockstaff
November 16 2013, 12:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
75ers wrote:

Look who's coaching these talented offensive kids. No wonder they don't have a chance. Goals build confidence, confidence builds desire, desire builds a team. With no goals we have no hope for this group.

1. Eakins - NHL Career grinder 2. MacT - NHL Career grinder / checker 3. Lowe - NHL Career Defensemen 4. Steve Smith - NHL Career Defensive Defensemen 5. Kelly Buchberger - NHL Career grinder 5. Keith Acton - Checking Faceoff Guy 6. Fred Chabot - Carrer AHL Goalie

Not one talented offensive minded guy in the bunch. Swarm, how stupid, sounds like something from JR High Girls Basketball (No offence intended) those girls play with more heart than this hockey team.

This makes absolutely zero sense. Quenville - defensive defenseman, 190 career pts; rest of Blackhawk coaching staff were defense and grinders, Stan Bowman never played pro hockey; Bylsma - gridner/forward; Hitchcock - never played, most defensive minded coach in the league, all five Sutter brothers, the list goes on. In fact the high scoring players turn coaches/GMs normally do rather poorly.

Try again

Avatar
#117 Dockstaff
November 16 2013, 01:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@OilCanFan

Hall isn't a "small" guy. At 6'1, 190 he's the same size as about half the guys in the league and will get bigger as he matures.

Arcobello has earned his place. One of the few guys on that team that hasn't been given anything and had to fight for every minute he's played. Move him to 2nd line C, and Gagner to the wing!!

Comments are closed for this article.