GDB 24.0: THREEPEAT

Jason Gregor
November 21 2013 01:06PM

I know that a threepeat is usually associated with winning three consecutive championships, but right now a three-game winning streak for the Oilers is as rare as a threepeat, so you need to start somewhere.

The Oilers dominated the Blue Jackets on Tuesday, and while a 7-0 drubbing is unlikely, if the Oilers play with the same speed, tenacity and determination they should defeat the Florida Panthers. However, as the Vancouver Canucks learned, you can't take anyone lightly, and I'd hope that the 29th place Oilers aren't looking at the 28th place Panthers as an easy opponent.

Tuesday was only one game, but the only way you can start a streak is by winning and tonight the Oilers have to build on that strong performance. They Oilers scored first for the first time in ten games. Their PP continues to produce, and they didn't give up any quality chances.

They aren't going to score seven goals every game, and they aren't going to rack up shutouts weekly, but they can find some ensure they have consistency in their game. It is what they lack the most. If the majority of players can learn to play with consistency, then, and only then, can we start to discuss actual progress.

Everyone from the fans, players, coaches, management and media knows the Oilers don't have the right mix of players to be an elite contender, and Craig MacTavish can't fix that overnight, but the players can learn to play with consistency.

The players have to realize that acquiring a top-pairing D-man or some size in their top-nine won't magically solve their problems. It won't instill uniformity in their game; they need to instill it now so when MacTavish adds pieces to the puzzle this team is ready to legitimately be competitive.

Obviously they want to win, but I don't believe they will start winning regularly until they learn to play with conviction, consistency and determination on a nightly basis.

They did that on Tuesday and now they need to do it tonight against a team they are capable of beating.

LINEUP

Hall-RNH-Eberle
Yakupov-Gagner-Hemsky
Smyth-Gordon-Perron
Jonesuu-Acton-Gazdic

Belov-J.Schultz
Ference-Petry
N. Schultz-Potter

Dubnyk

After consecutive victories there is no reason to change the lineup. Eakins will stick with five forward on his first PP unit, but suggested that might only last a few more games. There is a risk if they give up an odd man rush, but Eakins said that shouldn't happen, and the upside it immense with the creativity of the five forwards. In their last eight games the Oilers are 9 for 25 on the PP. Whatever combination they've used has worked.

QUICK HITS...

  • Ryan Smyth and Ales Hemsky are the only players still on the Oilers who played in the Heritage Classic ten years ago. Smyth said the biggest challenge was the temperature change. The benches were extremely warm with the heaters, but then you'd go on the ice and it was -22. He loved the experience and is hopeful the young kids will get to experience an outdoor game.
     
  • I'm hearing the Oilers and the NHL are looking at another outdoor game in Edmonton within the next two or three years.
     
  • Steve Staios tied a career high with three points in the 2003 Heritage Classic. Staios had a goal and two assists and was named 2nd star. He's had five three point games in his career and he had three that season.
     
  • The Oilers placed Steve MacIntyre on waivers today. Not much of a surprise considering he hasn't played one game this season and Luke Gazdic has played well in Macintyre's role. I asked Eakins about Gazdic and why he feels it is necessary to have a tough guy in the lineup.

    "I think it is important right now for our group. I know there is a lot of people out there who think that (fighting) has nothing to do with the game, but they've never stood on the bench and seen how it ignites your bench. I think it is important for all of our players to stand up for each other. It shows you care, especially when you come to one of your guy's defence. I think that goes a long, long way to your group's closeness. The way they will fight for each other, and I don't mean fist fight, I mean they are all pulling on the same rope.

    One of my favourite teams to watch the past few years is the Bruins. You touch one of their guys and five or six guys are waiting for you. That shows a team that is extremely close. There are no scrums where you have two or three guys skating around looking in the stands, everyone is in there supporting each other. You don't have to be big and tough to do that, you just need to stick up each other."
     
  • I then asked Eakins if he thinks his team has enough of a pack mentality, or is he trying to instill that?

    "It is something we are pushing to have happen, but we have gotten way better at since day one. There would be a scrum before and we would have three or four guys sitting back thinking the refs will get in there, but now we are starting to see guys jump in.

    A few games ago against Dallas, their agitator, Roussel, was fooling around with Potter and here comes Taylor Hall and he gives him a swat, chases him away and I was like, 'Yes, I love that from our team.'

    That resonates on the bench. That's why I find it interesting hearing people's views on violence in hockey that say it does nothing to the game, but maybe we should invite them down to the bench and see what it does to the guys who are getting ready to go out on the ice."
     
  • I've been critical of the Oilers overall lack of toughness for years, and not just fighting. I have noticed they are slowly getting better at standing up for one another, and that is a necessary step to showing a willingness to do whatever it takes to win.
     
  • For the past five years, I've participated in the Junior Chamber International of Edmonton Holiday Hamper program. You sign up and they place you with an underprivIleged family. They supply a grocery shopping list and you go buy the food and one small present for each member of the family. You then deliver the hamper to their house.

    It has made Christmas much more enjoyable for me, because it truly is about giving. The JCI is hoping to help 750 families this year and they need about 250 more people to sign up. This is a great bonding experience for your family and a great way to show your children how to help others in need. If you are interested in helping out go to www.holidayhamper.ca and click on hamper. They are hoping to fill the spots by December 1st.
     

THE FUTURE....

GAME DAY PREDICTION: THREEPEAT, THREEPEAT, THREEPEAT... Oiler fans aren't used to witnessing a three-game winning streak, but it will happen tonight. Oilers win 4-2.

OBVIOUS GAME DAY PREDICTION: After a big win the 50/50 will be back above $65,000. Winning makes fans feel better and willing to poney up some more cash in hopes of winning.

NOT-SO-OBVIOUS GAME DAY PREDICTION: Anton Belov, Nick Schultz and Sam Gagner are the only Oilers who have played 10 games and haven't scored. Gagner ends his drought tonight, and Belov shocks all of us as he decides to actually shoot the puck. He fires a career-high four shots on goal and scores his first NHL goal.

RECENTLY BY JASON GREGOR 

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#151 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#152 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#153 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#154 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#155 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#156 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#157 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#158 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#159 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#160 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#161 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#162 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#163 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#164 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#165 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#166 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#167 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#168 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#169 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#170 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#171 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#172 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:02PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#173 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:02PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#174 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:02PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#175 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:02PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#176 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:02PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#177 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:02PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#178 Johnnydapunk
November 21 2013, 09:22PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
YFC Prez wrote:

Almost 2 full games without giving up a goal. Cut him some slack on that one. A little lucky shot by upshall.

I accept that it was a bit of a harsh, borderline prickish in the heat of the moment comment, it's not that he let in a goal, that never gets to me too much, but he just lets in these weird goals that are a mystery how they go in, those goals make me crazy. I still don't know how that went in...

But yeah, I shouldn't be adding to the negativity pile too much as there is already an insane amount here and it doesn't help adding to it.

Avatar
#179 gongshow
November 21 2013, 11:56PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
ubermiguel wrote:

It's the mustaches. The Oilers must keep them after November.

Moustaches for remainder of season? Yes! And then swing a trade to get that Teddy Peckham guy back. Epic 'stache.

Avatar
#180 camdog
November 22 2013, 09:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@pkam

Against Columbus they got their 10 minutes.

I just don't understand based on the last 3 games, which forwards on the top 3 lines need to be sat, so the 4th liners can get more minutes?

When things begin to slide, Arcobello well get his games and he will get his minutes.

Avatar
#181 pkam
November 22 2013, 10:23AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
camdog wrote:

Against Columbus they got their 10 minutes.

I just don't understand based on the last 3 games, which forwards on the top 3 lines need to be sat, so the 4th liners can get more minutes?

When things begin to slide, Arcobello well get his games and he will get his minutes.

You want to roll 4 lines when possible. Usually the 2 top lines get about 18 minutes, the 3rd line get about 14 minutes and the 4th line get 10 minutes.

In other words, you don't sit the top 9 to give the 4th line the 10 minutes. It is when things do not work out that you sit the 4th line to give the extra minutes to the top 9, and more likely the top 6 who are more likely to create more scoring chances.

Avatar
#182 S cottV
November 21 2013, 03:57PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
DSF wrote:

Chicago is still looking for a #2C so I doubt they would move McNeill if they think he has that potential.

The thing with Florida is they are just loaded with young C's (remember Huberdeau was also a C in junior) so, for the right deal, I think they might move one.

Really like the Mark McNeil idea, if a way to make it work with Chicago. Has nice much needed size for the middle and a local kid who would probably love to play here. Also has considerable skill and potential to perhaps be a future 2nd line centreman with continued development.

Avatar
#183 Old School G
November 21 2013, 05:36PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
DSF wrote:

It's what a good GM would do.

We'll see.

I have not the slightest clue what kind of game Matthias plays, who are some comparables?

Avatar
#184 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#185 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#186 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#187 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#188 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#189 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#190 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#191 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#192 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#193 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#194 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#195 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#196 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#197 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#198 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#199 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#200 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Comments are closed for this article.