GDB 24.0: THREEPEAT

Jason Gregor
November 21 2013 01:06PM

I know that a threepeat is usually associated with winning three consecutive championships, but right now a three-game winning streak for the Oilers is as rare as a threepeat, so you need to start somewhere.

The Oilers dominated the Blue Jackets on Tuesday, and while a 7-0 drubbing is unlikely, if the Oilers play with the same speed, tenacity and determination they should defeat the Florida Panthers. However, as the Vancouver Canucks learned, you can't take anyone lightly, and I'd hope that the 29th place Oilers aren't looking at the 28th place Panthers as an easy opponent.

Tuesday was only one game, but the only way you can start a streak is by winning and tonight the Oilers have to build on that strong performance. They Oilers scored first for the first time in ten games. Their PP continues to produce, and they didn't give up any quality chances.

They aren't going to score seven goals every game, and they aren't going to rack up shutouts weekly, but they can find some ensure they have consistency in their game. It is what they lack the most. If the majority of players can learn to play with consistency, then, and only then, can we start to discuss actual progress.

Everyone from the fans, players, coaches, management and media knows the Oilers don't have the right mix of players to be an elite contender, and Craig MacTavish can't fix that overnight, but the players can learn to play with consistency.

The players have to realize that acquiring a top-pairing D-man or some size in their top-nine won't magically solve their problems. It won't instill uniformity in their game; they need to instill it now so when MacTavish adds pieces to the puzzle this team is ready to legitimately be competitive.

Obviously they want to win, but I don't believe they will start winning regularly until they learn to play with conviction, consistency and determination on a nightly basis.

They did that on Tuesday and now they need to do it tonight against a team they are capable of beating.

LINEUP

Hall-RNH-Eberle
Yakupov-Gagner-Hemsky
Smyth-Gordon-Perron
Jonesuu-Acton-Gazdic

Belov-J.Schultz
Ference-Petry
N. Schultz-Potter

Dubnyk

After consecutive victories there is no reason to change the lineup. Eakins will stick with five forward on his first PP unit, but suggested that might only last a few more games. There is a risk if they give up an odd man rush, but Eakins said that shouldn't happen, and the upside it immense with the creativity of the five forwards. In their last eight games the Oilers are 9 for 25 on the PP. Whatever combination they've used has worked.

QUICK HITS...

  • Ryan Smyth and Ales Hemsky are the only players still on the Oilers who played in the Heritage Classic ten years ago. Smyth said the biggest challenge was the temperature change. The benches were extremely warm with the heaters, but then you'd go on the ice and it was -22. He loved the experience and is hopeful the young kids will get to experience an outdoor game.
     
  • I'm hearing the Oilers and the NHL are looking at another outdoor game in Edmonton within the next two or three years.
     
  • Steve Staios tied a career high with three points in the 2003 Heritage Classic. Staios had a goal and two assists and was named 2nd star. He's had five three point games in his career and he had three that season.
     
  • The Oilers placed Steve MacIntyre on waivers today. Not much of a surprise considering he hasn't played one game this season and Luke Gazdic has played well in Macintyre's role. I asked Eakins about Gazdic and why he feels it is necessary to have a tough guy in the lineup.

    "I think it is important right now for our group. I know there is a lot of people out there who think that (fighting) has nothing to do with the game, but they've never stood on the bench and seen how it ignites your bench. I think it is important for all of our players to stand up for each other. It shows you care, especially when you come to one of your guy's defence. I think that goes a long, long way to your group's closeness. The way they will fight for each other, and I don't mean fist fight, I mean they are all pulling on the same rope.

    One of my favourite teams to watch the past few years is the Bruins. You touch one of their guys and five or six guys are waiting for you. That shows a team that is extremely close. There are no scrums where you have two or three guys skating around looking in the stands, everyone is in there supporting each other. You don't have to be big and tough to do that, you just need to stick up each other."
     
  • I then asked Eakins if he thinks his team has enough of a pack mentality, or is he trying to instill that?

    "It is something we are pushing to have happen, but we have gotten way better at since day one. There would be a scrum before and we would have three or four guys sitting back thinking the refs will get in there, but now we are starting to see guys jump in.

    A few games ago against Dallas, their agitator, Roussel, was fooling around with Potter and here comes Taylor Hall and he gives him a swat, chases him away and I was like, 'Yes, I love that from our team.'

    That resonates on the bench. That's why I find it interesting hearing people's views on violence in hockey that say it does nothing to the game, but maybe we should invite them down to the bench and see what it does to the guys who are getting ready to go out on the ice."
     
  • I've been critical of the Oilers overall lack of toughness for years, and not just fighting. I have noticed they are slowly getting better at standing up for one another, and that is a necessary step to showing a willingness to do whatever it takes to win.
     
  • For the past five years, I've participated in the Junior Chamber International of Edmonton Holiday Hamper program. You sign up and they place you with an underprivIleged family. They supply a grocery shopping list and you go buy the food and one small present for each member of the family. You then deliver the hamper to their house.

    It has made Christmas much more enjoyable for me, because it truly is about giving. The JCI is hoping to help 750 families this year and they need about 250 more people to sign up. This is a great bonding experience for your family and a great way to show your children how to help others in need. If you are interested in helping out go to www.holidayhamper.ca and click on hamper. They are hoping to fill the spots by December 1st.
     

THE FUTURE....

GAME DAY PREDICTION: THREEPEAT, THREEPEAT, THREEPEAT... Oiler fans aren't used to witnessing a three-game winning streak, but it will happen tonight. Oilers win 4-2.

OBVIOUS GAME DAY PREDICTION: After a big win the 50/50 will be back above $65,000. Winning makes fans feel better and willing to poney up some more cash in hopes of winning.

NOT-SO-OBVIOUS GAME DAY PREDICTION: Anton Belov, Nick Schultz and Sam Gagner are the only Oilers who have played 10 games and haven't scored. Gagner ends his drought tonight, and Belov shocks all of us as he decides to actually shoot the puck. He fires a career-high four shots on goal and scores his first NHL goal.

RECENTLY BY JASON GREGOR 

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#202 John Kirsch
November 21 2013, 03:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

Oilers rock them tonight 36-0. Which by the way is the temperature difference between Miami and Edmonton at the moment...

Edmontonian sipping cocktails on the beach in Key West!

Woot

Avatar
#203 smiliegirl15
November 21 2013, 04:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Thanks for the link to JCI. I am now a Holiday Hamper Elf!

Hopefully the confidence they've gotten in the last couple games will carry the Oilers into this game too. We know they have the ability and talent to do better.

Avatar
#204 madjam
November 21 2013, 04:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Chances are it is going to be much more than just a 3-pete . The oil is ignited .

Avatar
#205 westcoastoil
November 21 2013, 05:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
DSF wrote:

If I were Tallon, I'd run Barkov #1, Bjugstad #2. Matthias #3 and Goc #4 down the middle and, when Trocheck (over a PPG in the AHL) is ready, deal Matthias.

You have to remember the Panthers also have Quinton Howden in the AHL although he's not lighting it up.

Nice problem to have.

packaging some D - Marincin or Fedun if that's who they want - and getting back some C depth would be a good move for both clubs. The added bonus for Edm. may also be that clearing out some of the D logjam may help in signing Simpson, although he could still bolt if he wanted to.

Avatar
#206 bulldog12
November 21 2013, 06:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

I don't understand Arco sitting in the press box Second on team for face offs,near the top on hits,and points. Try some actual skill mixed with some size on the 4th line and see how they do. Arco can kill penalties,take D zone face offs and move up the lineup if someone's having an off night ( Hemsky) Acton doesn't do nothing for me, as Mac T says the most you can hope for is to be a non factor. That’s Acton to a t.

Avatar
#207 Tim in Kelowna
November 21 2013, 07:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Good read, Gregor. It's nice to finally be able to read positive articles about the Oil. I love Eakins' take on toughness/violence in hockey, and it is good to see the Oilers take the body a bit more and not back down from a physical challenge.

I'm hopeful for tonights game because they haven't been quite so cavalier in their own zone lately, and they have been less predictable in the offensive zone.

I've noticed a drop off in the number of sloppy drop-passes at the blue-line. The drop-pass turnovers really piss me off. Turnover reduction has been a key to the teams last 4 periods. Here's hoping they can keep it up!

Avatar
#208 Tim in Kelowna
November 21 2013, 07:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Good read, Gregor. It's nice to finally be able to read positive articles about the Oil. I love Eakins' take on toughness/violence in hockey, and it is good to see the Oilers take the body a bit more and not back down from a physical challenge.

I'm hopeful for tonights game because they haven't been quite so cavalier in their own zone lately, and they have been less predictable in the offensive zone.

I've noticed a drop off in the number of sloppy drop-passes at the blue-line. The drop-pass turnovers really piss me off. Turnover reduction has been a key to the teams last 4 periods. Here's hoping they can keep it up!

Avatar
#209 GK1980
November 21 2013, 07:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Oilers always act and talk "reactionary". Reacting to the opposition. How about for once the oilers decide the pace if the game. How about they set the time go once. Haven't seen that since the late 90's playoffs.

Avatar
#210 Hauk15
November 21 2013, 07:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Brryyyzzz!!

Avatar
#211 YFC Prez
November 21 2013, 07:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Ya hockey!!!!! Just looking at the panthers record. 3 wins in last 4. Beat the Avs , ducks and nucks. Go oilers , not going to be easy.

Avatar
#212 YFC Prez
November 21 2013, 07:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
YFC Prez wrote:

Ya hockey!!!!! Just looking at the panthers record. 3 wins in last 4. Beat the Avs , ducks and nucks. Go oilers , not going to be easy.

Woo hoo EBBS...... That looked very easy!!

Avatar
#213 vetinari
November 21 2013, 07:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Ebs for the score!

Avatar
#214 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 07:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Nuge with his best MacT impression, playing without the lid. Love it.

Avatar
#215 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#216 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#217 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#218 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#219 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#220 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#221 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#222 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#223 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#224 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#225 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

99 reserved for Gretzky

Avatar
#226 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#227 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#228 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#229 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#230 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#231 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#232 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#233 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#234 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#235 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#236 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#237 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#238 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#239 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#240 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#241 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#242 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#243 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#244 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#245 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#246 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#247 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#248 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#249 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Avatar
#250 Mike Krushelnyski
November 21 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Though you'd think when he's got the other guy's stick stuck in his visor for 30 seconds, the high sticking penalty is kind of implied.

Comments are closed for this article.