It's Past Time to Recall Linus Omark

Jonathan Willis
November 03 2013 07:59PM

There is a one-line argument against recalling Linus Omark. It goes like this: he’s a small winger whose primary ability lies in the offensive zone, and the Oilers are a team in need of big wingers who play a solid defensive game.

It doesn’t matter. It’s past time to bring him up.

The Left Wing Depth Chart

Let’s have a gander at the Oilers’ left wing depth chart from last night’s 5-0 loss to the Detroit Red Wings.

On the top line we have Ryan Jones. Jones is an NHL everyman – he can score a bit, hit a bit, kill penalties, and while he isn’t big he isn’t small either. He’s a very good fourth-liner, by which I mean he’s the kind of player who excels in a fourth line role and can step into the top-nine once injuries start hitting.

Nail Yakupov, a natural right wing, played on the second line with Sam Gagner and Ales Hemsky. I like Yakupov a lot as a player, and despite a slow start I’m not particularly worried that he’s the next Patrik Stefan. Initially, I thought playing him at left wing made a lot of sense – he’s a left-handed shot after all, and the team had and has a need at the position. These days, I subscribe to the idea that the best place for Yakupov to find his game is where he’s found it in the past and where he feels most comfortable: on right wing. I also subscribe to the notion that the Oilers need a productive Yakupov at right wing more than they need an unproductive Yakupov at left wing.

A 28-year-old minor-league journeyman fresh off injury filled the third line left wing spot last night. I know that Ryan Hamilton has a history with Dallas Eakins, and more importantly still I know he’s 6’2” tall and weighs 219 pounds. Those virtues do not suffice to explain why a guy with no history of being an NHL player and coming off a long time on injured reserve to boot is getting a top-nine job.

Finally, fourth on the left wing depth chart is Luke Gazdic. The Oilers get out-shot by a ridiculous rate with Gazdic on the ice; but fortunately for him his plus/minus doesn’t reflect that reality because the goalies have turned aside all 37 shots they’ve seen with him on the ice. That doesn’t change the fact that Gazdic is on the ice to hit and to fight rather than because of his ability to score or prevent goals. The argument about whether that sort of role player is an effective part of an NHL team is for another day; suffice to say for now that he isn’t a credible option above line four.

Meanwhile, in the minors

I understand that Linus Omark is a flawed player. I get why, on a healthy Oilers roster, he isn’t a fit – and by that I mean not only do I grasp the argument, I agree with it.

But when the situation changes, things must be reassessed. We have already seen the most cogent argument in favour of Omark right now – the Oilers’ emaciated left wing group. But there’s more. Omark currently leads the Barons with 12 points in 12 games, and he’s producing under some difficult circumstances.

Last night, for example, Omark played on Oklahoma’s top line with C.J. Stretch (an ECHL find last year) and first-year professional Andrew Miller. He typically played against either one or the other of the Chicago Wolves top-two lines – both of which were loaded to the gills with players with NHL experience. The Barons got scoring from all over, but won the game mostly because Omark was able to drive his line to 20-7 shots/missed shots advantage at even-strength.

Omark’s own scoring has been hit-and-miss – a four-point game here, a four-goal game there – but the constant is that his line has generated scoring chances.

Omark is not going to play the heavy game the Oilers would love to see from their next call-up, but then Luke Gazdic and Ben Eager (or, for that matter, Kale Kessy) will and arguing for anyone in that group to get a promotion is crazy. Overall play counts for something, too, and it’s something the Oilers have lacked that Omark can give them.

What I’d “Like” To See

It seems obvious that the Oilers’ forward lineup is going to be a mess until such time as the injury brigade gets back. Taylor Hall and David Perron and Ryan Smyth, not Linus Omark, are the solution to the Oilers’ left wing problems. Until those players return, the Oilers’ lines are going to be ugly.

In the meantime, though, I think the best deployment of personnel probably looks something like this (ordered by quality of competition):

1. Ales Hemsky – Ryan Nugent-Hopkins – Jordan Eberle. The Oilers don’t really have a power-vs.-power line; Taylor Hall or David Perron is needed to give them one. Of the bad available choices, though, Ales Hemsky seems like the best fit. He’s had the power-vs.-power job before, he’s a veteran guy, and he actually looked pretty good when Tom Renney spotted him here back in 2011-12.

2. Ryan Jones – Boyd Gordon – Mark Arcobello. The Oilers’ don’t really have the pieces for a strong defensive “third” line either. Gordon is a fit as that line’s centre, Arcobello gives the line a second faceoff man, and while Jones isn’t an ideal fit he’s been okay in previous incarnations of this line (the Smyth – Horcoff – Jones trio doing a nice job at points).

3. Linus Omark – Sam Gagner – Nail Yakupov. I know. This is an all-offence line, geared toward offensive zone starts and deployed against the other team’s bottom-six. It gives Yakupov a chance to play offensive minutes at his natural position, Gagner a chance to ease back into the lineup and both of them a third player in Omark who can help drive offensive results.

The comments section may disagree, and honestly I’m not wild about it myself: there’s no combination of forwards that I particularly like right now for the Oilers. But what I do think is that regardless of how the lines are arranged, Linus Omark stands a better chance of getting the job done in the top nine than a couple of players the Oilers currently have there and a far better chance than any of the potential fourth-line promotions.

Even if it’s something as simple as sticking Omark in the Jones’ slot on the top line, bumping Jones down to the Gordon line and sending Hamilton to Oklahoma on a conditioning stint, I think the Oilers are better off with the guy who is driving results in Oklahoma than they are with the current crop of candidates.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 vetinari
November 03 2013, 08:02PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
48
cheers

Release.... The Kraken!

(or failing that, call up Omark -- why should he miss out on the fun?)

Avatar
#2 Stack Pad Save
November 03 2013, 08:11PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
39
cheers

But Willis, your using logic to dictate your lines. You tried to remove bias from forming your decision. Expecting anyone within the Oilers organization to do the same would be ludicrous.

I am to the point where I don't care if the Oilers suck more. I think the Oilers should fail for the next 2 years and get McDavid personally. If we can watch the last 2 games, and still find time to blog about the Oilers we can stomach the wait for McDavid.

Avatar
#3 R U Kidding Me!
November 03 2013, 08:17PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers

Linus Omark, our savior!

Avatar
#4 Oilcan
November 03 2013, 08:18PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
25
cheers

Would rather see: gagner-RNH-eberle, jones-Gordan-hemsky, omark-arco-yakupov

Avatar
#5 D
November 03 2013, 08:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
18
cheers

JW, what is this "driving results" term all about? As a fan of the Oilers, I've never heard of this.

Avatar
#6 David Staples
November 03 2013, 08:23PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
64
cheers

How about Arcobello at centre, Gagner on the wing, at least until Gagner has enough wind to actually, you know, backcheck?

Avatar
#7 Lowetide
November 03 2013, 08:23PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
58
cheers

The Omark decision is beyond curious. Excellent article, Jon.

Avatar
#8 bulldog12
November 03 2013, 08:23PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
38
cheers

Omarks down fall is his defensive game How could it possibly be any worse than the rest of these stooges Maybe Omark will show a little desperation enthusiasm heart that could rub off on the rest of them What would it hurt to give him a shot what's one more loss

Avatar
#9 Racki
November 03 2013, 08:24PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
24
cheers

That line 3 will likely be good for a line change while the puck is heading towards the defensive zone. And I'm with David on the suggestion to put Arco back at C.. it was working better with him there.

Avatar
#10 Jordan1126
November 03 2013, 08:25PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
40
cheers

Would rather just see EFFORT and HEART before we worry about line combos.

Without that it really doesn't matter does it. They can draw sticks for lines for all I care but until they show that they care, they won't win. Period.

Avatar
#11 Fisher
November 03 2013, 08:26PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
25
cheers

Or better yet, showcase the hell out of Linus. We're not gonna make the playoffs this year, and he's not resigning. Why not put him into a position to possibly do something, hope like hell he catches fire, then hope a trade market for him pops up, trade him to a team starving for offence, (hopefully in a package deal) and pick up a D man.

Avatar
#12 Jordan1126
November 03 2013, 08:30PM
Trash it!
24
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

@Fisher

It's too bad he doesn't have top six size or bottom six grit. Just like the majority of our players. Nobody is going to give up a solid 1-2 D man for Linus plus. There is no market for this kid. He can't even crack our ahl version of the oilers. Who would want him

Avatar
#13 Death Metal Nightmare
November 03 2013, 08:33PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

this organization is getting excessively annoying with how they hand out jobs and who they give opportunities.

they see mediocre players as leaders and develop hilarious biases towards players that arent that good. they throw other players under the bus.

the "wise" in their ivory tower of hockey knowledge and "experienced winning as players" really are looking like a steaming pile of feces.

Avatar
#14 Craig1981
November 03 2013, 08:34PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
23
cheers

I feel like it won't hurt. Eakins said that they have lost confidence. Bring in a few players that have it right now. Send down the ones that don't.

Avatar
#15 Sandra
November 03 2013, 08:41PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
21
cheers
David Staples wrote:

How about Arcobello at centre, Gagner on the wing, at least until Gagner has enough wind to actually, you know, backcheck?

Agreed! I question some of the decisions Eakins makes.

Avatar
#16 David S
November 03 2013, 08:42PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
29
cheers

Linus Omark – Sam Gagner – Nail Yakupov

*Suddenly feels gonch tightening*

Avatar
#17 BorjeSalming-IanTurnbull
November 03 2013, 08:47PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

I think the team has quit on the Coach. When the head coach doesn't even bother to go on the ice during practise to get a face to face experience with his team?? This I don't understand.

Shut out two straight and you have Ryan Jones playing top six minutes when you could insert Omark and he'll work his bag off and chip in on the score sheet. A no brainer.

Also an observation that bugs the hell out of me. When I played the game I was taught at a young age to keep the stick on the ice at all times. When Yakapov doesn't have to puck his stick is always up by his hip?? Big time grinds my gears when even in the NHL the fundamentals still need to be taught to 1st overall picks

Avatar
#18 DSF
November 03 2013, 08:47PM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
David S wrote:

Linus Omark – Sam Gagner – Nail Yakupov

*Suddenly feels gonch tightening*

Stamkos is already smiling.

Avatar
#19 Jordan1126
November 03 2013, 08:47PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers
David S wrote:

Linus Omark – Sam Gagner – Nail Yakupov

*Suddenly feels gonch tightening*

If your anything like the oilers then you don't have to worry about the gonch tightening because chances are you were "unprepared" and forgot to put some on.

Avatar
#20 Cameron
November 03 2013, 08:51PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
46
cheers

I love it when Omark is once again a topic on ON. He really has an army of closet followers and as I have said before, gets more reaction than DSF on this site. I think that Linus however, has been "Sourayed" and therefore unlikely to be looked at.

Does anyone actually think he could make this team any worse?

Avatar
#21 canucknnv
November 03 2013, 08:51PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
36
cheers

The Oilers management don't have enough karma and goodwill in their accounts to be dicks to a player just for the sake of being dicks.

If they had no intentions of using him for the last few years and especially now, release the poor kid and quit burning a contract on the 50 man for nothing.

Dicks.

Avatar
#22 Jordan1126
November 03 2013, 08:52PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers
canucknnv wrote:

The Oilers management don't have enough karma and goodwill in their accounts to be dicks to a player just for the sake of being dicks.

If they had no intentions of using him for the last few years and especially now, release the poor kid and quit burning a contract on the 50 man for nothing.

Dicks.

They can't let him go. They need someone to play piano for Charlie browns christmas next month

Avatar
#23 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
November 03 2013, 08:54PM
Trash it!
20
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

1 or 2 pts on this next trip should keep 30th within striking distance.

Short term pain, long term gain. Stay the course!

Avatar
#24 oilers1168
November 03 2013, 08:55PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
32
cheers

Arco in a short time has convinced me he is a better center on a small sample so lets have him there with Yak and Linus.

Linus has matured and deserves an opportunity even if it is to show case him for a trade or a packaged trade.

Avatar
#25 canucknnv
November 03 2013, 08:56PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
23
cheers

@Jordan1126

I'm sure Katz would love to spend Omarks 600k on the 37 head coaches still on the payroll.

Avatar
#26 reaperfunkss (2nd tier fan)
November 03 2013, 09:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
24
cheers

Arco is dying on the wing

Avatar
#27 Dog Train
November 03 2013, 09:09PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers

This organization is too proud to call up Omark. I would be in favour of calling him up but it wouldn't surprise me in the least if another injured forward leads to Andrew Miller getting called up. It's ridiculous, management talks about Omark needing to work on his defensive game (not saying he doesn't) while guys like Gagner get a bunch of minutes because they were high draft picks. Results matter, except for the Oilers apparently.

Avatar
#29 DSF
November 03 2013, 09:19PM
Trash it!
20
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:

Isn't he more likely to be upset that Linus Omark is back in his nice, respectful league?

I'm sure he'll show his displeasure by pumping 2 or 3 goals against that line.

You pegged them as a 3rd line but remember who gets last change on the road.

Avatar
#30 Bryan in SK
November 03 2013, 09:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
25
cheers

I've had a headache since the puck dropped last night. Yet, I can't believe I'm sitting here at my computer reading Oilers blogs again! Talk about Stockholm Syndrome.

I wish I could be cured from this disease.

Avatar
#31 Clayton Abernathy
November 03 2013, 09:28PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

Have things gone that bad for Oiler fans that they actually think Linus Omark is the team saviour? WOW.

Avatar
#32 DSF
November 03 2013, 09:29PM
Trash it!
24
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
Clayton Abernathy wrote:

Have things gone that bad for Oiler fans that they actually think Linus Omark is the team saviour? WOW.

Yes.

Avatar
#33 Oiler Al
November 03 2013, 09:29PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

Thinking outside the box a bit, but seeing has how the forward depth is short and depleted, Why not bring up a Dman from OKC and see how Schultz Jr. would do playing forward/. Worked for Burns in San Jose. {unless Schultz is injured still..)

Avatar
#35 Ken
November 03 2013, 09:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

Watched the oilers for years. i'm very frustrated with whats happening to the team this year. Just for fun bring up the whole OKC Barons team to give it a go. Just might get some wins.

Avatar
#36 Zarny
November 03 2013, 09:38PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers

Recalling Omark could be a good move.

No, he isn't the answer long term; but short term he could provide a spark and some excitement.

And whether it's this week, Christmas, the trade deadline or the draft MacT will have to execute some bold moves. That requires currency. You gotta give something to get something.

If Omark can establish himself as an NHL player you can package him in a deal or trade someone higher on the depth chart.

Avatar
#37 Yeah For Sure
November 03 2013, 09:42PM
Trash it!
31
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers
David S wrote:

Linus Omark – Sam Gagner – Nail Yakupov

*Suddenly feels gonch tightening*

You can never have too many SOFT MIDGET FaIRY DAFODILS in your lineup right??? I stood next to Lander and Omark at a pre-season game, it was like standing next to two little grade sixes at recess! NO MORE MIDGETS PLEASE!!!

Avatar
#38 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
November 03 2013, 10:01PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Calgary Flames- 3rd lowest payroll in the league. Over 12 million in cap space.

Colorado Avalanche- 2nd lowest payroll in the league and 12.5 in cap space remaining.

....and just like animal livestock, carrots are murdered (forcibly removed from their cozy living environment) so they can be processed and consumed by humans and some horses.

Avatar
#39 Rob Gilgan
November 03 2013, 10:08PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Linus Omark is a wizard. Building a team ‘the NHL way’ doesn’t seem to be producing the desired result. Let him go dazzle and inspire. Can’t hurt at this point - and I’ll actually watch a game if he’s in the lineup. And after last night, that’s not something that’s likely to happen very often.

Avatar
#40 OilDieHard
November 03 2013, 10:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
Oiler Al wrote:

Thinking outside the box a bit, but seeing has how the forward depth is short and depleted, Why not bring up a Dman from OKC and see how Schultz Jr. would do playing forward/. Worked for Burns in San Jose. {unless Schultz is injured still..)

^he might do well, but he'd just be another buttery soft forward. (one who could produce mind you)

Avatar
#41 Ari Gold
November 03 2013, 10:14PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers

Should the Oilers bring him up. Yes.

In the grand scheme of things that is this season: will it matter? No.

Does this organization deserve fans like us? No.

Linus Omark is like taking a Tums to appease your gastric tumour. You need surgery, cut the damn thing out.

Did Calgary beat the defending SC champs in Chicago? Yes.

Avatar
#42 OilDieHard
November 03 2013, 10:14PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
Yeah For Sure wrote:

You can never have too many SOFT MIDGET FaIRY DAFODILS in your lineup right??? I stood next to Lander and Omark at a pre-season game, it was like standing next to two little grade sixes at recess! NO MORE MIDGETS PLEASE!!!

^but just to add to that ton of fun, some would like to try the buttery soft Justin Schultz at forward....

Avatar
#43 72Ken
November 03 2013, 10:21PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

For all you Omark haters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=aBdO66187Os

Avatar
#45 Naky
November 03 2013, 10:40PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

Omark can't possibly make this team any worse than it already is right now. It's already a defensive mess to the point where comparing it to junior level is insulting junior players. To make matters worse, we can't seemingly score any more either. If there was ever a time for him to shine in a 'couldn't possibly be worse' scenario, this is definitely it.

Avatar
#46 oilers2k10
November 03 2013, 10:42PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers
David Staples wrote:

How about Arcobello at centre, Gagner on the wing, at least until Gagner has enough wind to actually, you know, backcheck?

I'm confused myself why the coach would put a guy who has been good at both ends of the ice and can win his share of faceoffs on the wing in favour of an NHL veteran that consistently struggles at the center position..

Avatar
#47 derrickhands
November 03 2013, 10:45PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I've missed watching one game and Omark is playing as a individual, that tends to hold on to the puck way too long. He's the last thing the Oilers need, they have to many puck hogs as it is. I notice you failed to mention the Friday game against the Chicago Wolfs where he was shutout and was almost non existent. You never know when Omark will show up to play and you want him to be recalled.

Avatar
#48 jack
November 03 2013, 10:48PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

you must be kidding, omark is like minus 50 on the barons, worst idea of all time, so what if he has 10 goals, hes been on for like 60 or whatever

Avatar
#49 VK63
November 03 2013, 10:57PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers
David Staples wrote:

How about Arcobello at centre, Gagner on the wing, at least until Gagner has enough wind to actually, you know, backcheck?

Are you sure 89s back checking issue is "wind" related.

If so... theres a lot of oilers with wind issues.

Well I guess only the ones with a vowel in their name.

Avatar
#50 Naky
November 03 2013, 11:11PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

@jack

So what you're saying is that he'd fit right in with the current bunch, except that he'd actually manage to score. Still sounds like an upgrade to me. If nothing else on a team with confidence issues, it might be interesting to see a player with no shortage of it do his best to make it rub off on the rest.

Hell, we're all actually wondering if it wouldn't be a good thing to have priests exorcise the dressing room or whatever the heck it is that Gregor was yammering on about in that article a week or so ago. Is Omark really that much of an 'out there' thing these days?

Comments are closed for this article.