The State of the Defence

Jonathan Willis
November 04 2013 10:38AM

No position represented more of a challenge for Craig MacTavish this off-season than defence. The Oilers general manager made a number of moves to address the situation; some of them have worked better than others.

The Current Top-Six

1. Jeff Petry. I’m no longer surprised by it, but I still struggle to comprehend the level of ambivalence some fans feel toward the Oilers’ best defenceman. Is the all-situations workhorse probably best suited to the two/three slot on a better team? Sure. But as it stands he’s the one guy who does everything well – he skates and moves the puck without being the defensive nightmare others are, and he’s really stepped up his physical game. He’s not the problem, he’s not part of the problem, and if the Oilers had three of him they’d be much better than they are right now.

2. Justin Schultz. Schultz ranks second in total ice-time on the Oilers’ blue line. that’s not an especially misleading figure either, because while Schultz does get massive minutes on the man advantage he’s also the Oilers’ most-used defender at even-strength in terms of ice-time per game (18:11). His talent level is undeniable, but he seems to perpetually be in ‘cheat for offence’ mode, which may work fine in the AHL but has yet to produce the desired results in the majors. No defenceman on the team is getting minutes more slanted to offence, yet somehow Schultz’s on-ice shot rates are miserable. At this point, he’d probably be playing the role of power play specialist on a good team – assuming he wasn’t in the pressbox.

3. Andrew Ference. The first of Craig MacTavish’s defensive fixes, Ference has at times looked overwhelmed. Some of that may be thanks to a regular partnership with Nick Schultz, a partnership that not only puts Schultz on his off-side but also forces Ference to be the primary puck-mover on the pairing. Regardless of the cause, Ference looks to me like a guy who could do what he did in Boston: fill the four slot on a deep blue line.

4. Anton Belov. Craig MacTavish’s other big fix has been a very pleasant surprise. The Russian rookie started slowly, but his play has continually improved – he moves the puck well, gets in shooting lanes, and while understated physically he has a penchant for making smart hits that separate the opposition player from the puck and take him out of the play entirely. On a deep team, Belov would be a wonderful asset on the third pairing; in Edmonton (assuming an injury suffered against Detroit isn’t severe) it wouldn’t be a shock if he eventually slotted in as the team’s top left-side defender.

5. Ladislav Smid. It’s been a bit of a rough year for the big Czech defenceman. He struggled early with Jeff Petry, got bumped down to (an awful) pairing with Nick Schultz, and has since rebounded when reunited with Petry. There have been indications that Edmonton’s new management isn’t sold on Smid, owing to his struggles with the puck; one wonders whether he might not be the centerpiece of a deal that brought back a better defender the other way.

6. Nick Schultz. My personal opinion: Schultz could still excel in a third-pairing role in the right situation, ideally as the left-side defender playing with a solid right-shooting puck-mover. Instead, he’s mostly played with Andrew Ference or Ladislav Smid, and he’s mostly played on his off-side. A high number of own-zone starts probably hasn’t helped matters much, either. He’s an NHL player, but he’s declining and his skill-set is a sub-optimal fit for the Oilers’ current group.

The Reserves

One quick note: the guys below are arranged in order of proximity to a permanent spot on the NHL roster (as judged by me) rather than by their overall potential or anything else.

  • Corey Potter. He’s played pretty well in the AHL early, but he still isn’t 100 percent physically after injuring his back in off-season workouts. I’d be surprised if he doesn’t work his way on to the Oilers roster at some point and stay there.
  • Philip Larsen. Flashy puck-mover has been a point-per-game player for Oklahoma City. He’s a nice fit anywhere from the seven slot on in an organizational depth chart.
  • Denis Grebeshkov. The hope was that a guy who had once been extremely effective for Craig MacTavish in the 4/5 slot would be again. Instead, Grebeshkov got behind the eight ball early thanks to injury and seems to lack the confidence of the coaching staff.
  • Taylor Fedun. All-purpose defenceman lacks size, and I wonder if he’s doomed to being a ‘tweener as a result. He does everything well but his offensive production isn’t what one would hope for from a smallish puck-mover.
  • Brandon Davidson. Defensive defenceman has been asked to do a lot by Oklahoma coach Todd Nelson, and he’s struggled with the workload at times. He does everything pretty well and has some size to boot.
  • Oscar Klefbom. Talent-wise, this guy is clearly the defenceman in Oklahoma to bet on; he has Smid’s strength and physical game but adds puck-moving ability to the equation. He’s also in need of seasoning because he makes questionable decisions sometimes but he’s a credible call-up option if the Oilers run into injury.
  • Martin Marincin. I wonder if Marincin might not be on his way out, just owing to the depth chart above him. He’s a big guy who can move the puck (he was great against the Chicago Wolves on Saturday) but he still has those occasional ugly hiccups and his offensive ability isn’t so amazing that he’s a must-keep player.

Just Wondering…

Recapping the list above puts some pretty solid conclusions in my mind, ones that I think will be uncontroversial with the readers here. The Oilers have good depth defensively, both in terms of players to fill out the bottom half of the NHL depth chart and in the minor-leagues. If the three through seven slots of your NHL team are filled with Jeff Petry, Ladislav Smid, Andrew Ference, Justin Schultz and Anton Belov, you’re doing awfully well. Having Potter and Grebeshkov and Larsen and Fedun and Klefbom and Davidson and Marincin all available in case a plague hits is an awfully nice luxury, too.

But all those depth players start looking like liabilities when they are forced into positions they simply aren’t ready to play. It’s much the same problem as last year: the top guys are slotting in one pairing ahead of where they would in a perfect world. The Oilers have more options, but they still lack top-pairing guys.

I wonder if one might not be available. A player like Nikita Nikitin or Braydon Coburn would help, but they also suffer from much the same problem Andrew Ference does: while good NHL players, they aren’t likely to fix the top pairing themselves.

The guy I have in mind is signed long-term at a reasonable cap hit. He’s 31, which means he should still have some good years left in him but he also has a wealth of experience. He’s played key minutes for good teams and while he isn’t a classic number one defenceman he’s a pretty solid top-pairing option.

Christian Ehrhoff isn’t a perfect fit, but it’s an imperfect world and I wonder if he isn’t the best alternative available to the Oilers. Shea Weber or Oliver Ekman-Larsson make for fun trade fantasies, but the odds of those teams moving those players have to be considered extremely low – and that’s even assuming Craig MacTavish is willing to move one of his core guys the other way. Ehrhoff, playing on the lowly Sabres and popping up in trade rumours, might be as good as the options get.

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#51 Rheal1
November 04 2013, 11:15AM
Trash it!
15
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
Oil Kings 'n' Pretty Things wrote:

Fortunately for the Oilers, the only players who have a say in the matter are the players who have that right written into their contract.

If I were one of those players, I'd feel like it's time to start looking for a place to live in Edmonton, because that's my job.

I see you are not a NHL player... 'Cause if you were, especially in the southern USA your wife/girlfriend would not be very happy to move to the frozen tundra and you would join a perpetual loser that is the Oilers organization. As well your personal stats would highly likely go down and you would enter a dressing room every single day where a negative atmosphere would prevail.

Avatar
#52 GriffCity
November 04 2013, 11:32AM
Trash it!
17
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Fair enough, you did state that on a good team Petry would be a 3rd defenceman, I don't even believe that to be true. But while you're busy defending your article and attempting to point out the flaws in what im saying, you also said "he stands out as the one guys who does everything well". Well...hmm, I suppose he does turn the puck over pretty well, and he does get burned pretty well, and he does make stupid plays pretty well, so I guess you are correct. You simply cannot make as many mistakes as Petry makes and be told, " you're playing well". It is a sad state of affairs on the Oilers blueline when Petry needs to log 23 minutes of ice time a game. In a game where small mistakes can cost you big points, Petry makes way too many and anyone who knows defence will tell you the same thing. He's not nearly as good as you have just given him credit for.

Avatar
#53 godot10
November 04 2013, 11:54AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Andrew Ference, a 30-something #4-5 at best got the Steve Staios 4-year overpay with the NMC. And you want to add another 2nd pairing at best decliining 30-something defensemen in Ehrhoff with an eternally long contract.

These contracts can't be buried in the minors anymore.

You can maybe live with one of these 30-something guys on eternally long contracts. It is foolhardy to have two of them.

Avatar
#54 GriffCity
November 04 2013, 12:05PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
TigerUnderGlass wrote:

FFS, because he is a #3 playing against #1 competition. If you can't see how that matters you are beyond hopeless.

Why? Why is it that he is being outclassed by #1 competition? Are we the fans supposed to sit idly by and justify that by saying he is a #3 d-man? Is this some kind of joke? Why then do we have to have this conversation? Why can we not match other teams top fwds with our top d-men? If he simply isnt good enough to be matched against these players then fix it. Dont continue to play him again and again expecting a different result. Do you know what the defenition of insanity is?? Repeating the same action again and again but expecting a different result. This is what its come to in Oil country? Insanity? If you can't see the point that im trying to make then you my friend are the one who is wildly hopeless.

Avatar
#55 Neal
November 04 2013, 12:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Jonathan, the difficulty in acquiring a top pairing D has been well documented. I have no doubt Mac is on the phones now exploring what's out there. But he's dealing from a position of weakness and no doubt knows it. And worse, you know as well as everyone else that the available pickin's are slim indeed. Shouldn't we be examining our system play instead, because we're stuck with these guys for a bit? For exsample, it baffles me that Nick Schultz has gone from a D trumpeted as so positionally sound that he was beat only rarely,to where he is now. What happened? Surely we can improve this...

Avatar
#56 Mikey
November 04 2013, 12:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
GriffCity wrote:

You are really sold on Petry? Lol, anyone who thinks he is a viable number 1 defenceman on any team is either hockey illiterate or just simply not watching. While Petry does have an upside it in no way makes up for his blunders in other areas. For every good thing Petry does, he does 3 things poorly. He is consistently out of position, passing into shooting lanes, missing assignments and playing an overall weak game. Simply because he has made a few body checks this season does not take away from the fact that he gently caresses the other teams forwards in front of the net, clearing no one out of the blue paint and screening his goalie, causing goals against in the process. He turns the puck over at an alarming rate, nearly as much as N Schultz with his patented pass up the ice directly back to the other teams defence. Petry is not to blame for the oilers record but he certainly deserves no credit for playing well either. This is professional hockey and just because you show glimpses of brilliance (Yakupov) does not mean your overall game doesn't stink big time.

The Oilers blue line is a mess and they need at least 2 legit top defenceman to change that. How they attain these players has yet to be determined but the one thing we can say is that the Oilers D are among the easiest to play against in the entire league and your pal Petry fits that mold perfectly. He is easy to play against period.

Did you even read what he wrote? He said Petry is not a number one D, but thats the best the oilers have.

Avatar
#57 DoubleDIon
November 04 2013, 01:29PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
DSF wrote:

Ehrhoff was also the key to Vancouver's league leading PP.

It's never been the same since he left.

I do like Erhoff, but man that contract is lengthy. Erhoff and Myers could be good gets though if the price is reasonable. If you could get them both for Eberle and Smid would you do it?

Avatar
#58 Lochenzo
November 04 2013, 01:53PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I'm on board for acquiring Erhoff. A little leery of the price though. Buffalo is the only seller out there right now. Even Philly is still trying to make their current roster better in the Downie trade. Buffalo got a lot for Vanek.

The Oiler 1st round picks should be off the table. If the Oilers finish bottom 10 this year and also traded away their pick, that would be a disaster upon a disaster. And you can't trade the 2015 pick either. That's the Connor McDavid lottery.

Avatar
#59 Death Metal Nightmare
November 04 2013, 11:09AM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Petry has some real Male Bimbo/Surfer factor to his game. "yo, i'm so sexy, check out my relaxed good looks - WHOOPS - i just drove my Woody into the ocean."

he'd be a 2 with a hall of famer next to him. he'd be a 3/4 otherwise on a competitive team. point being: his game needs to be MASKED like numerous players on this team. this isnt a "team". it's a bunch of complimentary guys waiting for "improvements" to augment their low IQ games.

just way too many weird brain farts. his giveaway pass to no one on the second goal vs. Detroit the other day was another one. trying to be way too fancy through the neutral zone with a soft pass the forward wasnt ready for (and could have been absolutely murdered on at the blue line if it hit his tape). "get the puck deep" F-that. it's sexy time. whoops, 2-0.

Avatar
#60 Rheal1
November 04 2013, 11:31AM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Oil Kings 'n' Pretty Things wrote:

With all the free healthcare up here I guess they could get their feelings checked out on the cheap.

What you're getting at really has nothing to do with anything. If you don't have a NMC/NTC in your contract, your opinion of the destination city does not factor into the discussion.

Additionally, being a professional hockey player involves periodically relocating. That is part of their job.

I'm going to Churchill, MB (an actual frozen tundra) on Friday for work and leaving my girlfriend down south. That is my job, though, so I suck it up and enjoy the polar bears.

"What you're getting at really has nothing to do with anything".

This applies to your rebuttal. I'd agree to disagree with your reasoning. I bet that 99% of NHL players with NMC have Edmonton in it. For the reminder their agents would resist any trade of their client to Edmonton. You'd think with all our talented young players that would attract more interest, right? I bet Justin Schultz bitterly regrets not staying in Anaheim by now.

Avatar
#61 andrewmk20
November 04 2013, 12:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@They're $hittie

While talented that is an extremely young dcore. They need at least another experienced dman to play in their top pairing or we get a repeat of this season. They need a legit experienced dman to calm down the game and control the pace.

Avatar
#62 K_Mart
November 04 2013, 01:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@CHT get a clue

Avatar
#63 pkam
November 04 2013, 02:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
DSF wrote:

That contract is why Gillis, reluctantly, let Ehrhoff go.

But, with the changes in the CBA that would require Buffalo to deal with the cap charges if he retires early, the contract is not an issue at all.

You'd be hard pressed to find a better D at a $4M cap hit.

But I doubt he would want to leave one mess in Buffalo for another one in Edmonton.

The worst part of Ehrhoff's contract is the 1st 2 years. Once the 1st 2 years are over, his contract is one of the best in the league.

Ehrhoff's contract is not the same as Luongo's. Luongo will be 43 in the last year of his contract, Ehrhoff will be 38 only. Big difference.

And top pairing defenseman at 38 are signing for 4M+ this off season. I didn't see any team signing 38+ goalie to 5M+.

If a 1st rounder is all it takes to acquire him, it is a no brainer for any team.

Avatar
#64 Tikkanese
November 04 2013, 03:44PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@JW

The problem with Petry is, even if he is our best defenceman(I would vote for Ference, he never stops competing), that just further shows what a sad state our defense is in. I think you are being generous saying Petry would be "probably best suited to the two/three slot on a better team". To me, he'd be bottom pairing on a contender.

I counted four goals against the last two games that Petry was the main cause of.

We do have depth 4-12, all pretty much interchangeable and none of our D currently are top pairing worthy. Waiting 3-4 years for Klefbom and Nurse to become reliable top pairing worthy is going to be painful. Hopefully Mactavish makes something happen.

Avatar
#65 S cottV
November 04 2013, 11:19AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
GriffCity wrote:

You are really sold on Petry? Lol, anyone who thinks he is a viable number 1 defenceman on any team is either hockey illiterate or just simply not watching. While Petry does have an upside it in no way makes up for his blunders in other areas. For every good thing Petry does, he does 3 things poorly. He is consistently out of position, passing into shooting lanes, missing assignments and playing an overall weak game. Simply because he has made a few body checks this season does not take away from the fact that he gently caresses the other teams forwards in front of the net, clearing no one out of the blue paint and screening his goalie, causing goals against in the process. He turns the puck over at an alarming rate, nearly as much as N Schultz with his patented pass up the ice directly back to the other teams defence. Petry is not to blame for the oilers record but he certainly deserves no credit for playing well either. This is professional hockey and just because you show glimpses of brilliance (Yakupov) does not mean your overall game doesn't stink big time.

The Oilers blue line is a mess and they need at least 2 legit top defenceman to change that. How they attain these players has yet to be determined but the one thing we can say is that the Oilers D are among the easiest to play against in the entire league and your pal Petry fits that mold perfectly. He is easy to play against period.

One shift may not be a general indicator but the killer in the Red Wing game was an awful shift by Petry. A top 2 d man or any d man cannot take an "all in" chance on a bouncing puck with an opposition forward behind him. Then - Eakins leaves him out (a bad decision in hindsight) and Petry throws a tentative lame duck ugly pass up the middle creating an immediate and dangerous counter attack. Back checking forwards add to the gaffe by looking at the puck and not picking up the Red Wing trailer. A bad start was the last thing this depleted and demoralized group needed, particularly from a solid top 2 d man....

Avatar
#66 **
November 04 2013, 11:29AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

The first goal from the red wings the other night is the reason why I don't go head over hills about Petry. For all he does right he seems to make stupid mistakes like that one and most of the time they end up in his net. Or like an own stick deflection in one of the first games that beat Dubnyk from the blue line. If Petry is compared to the rest of the Oilers D men, yes is is the best probably, but how is this team going to improve at all if it goes by that type of comparison. Compare him to the rest of the league, and at best he is a top 4 guy. He will probably end up playing on a third pairing for most of his career.

Avatar
#67 Zarny
November 04 2013, 03:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
DSF wrote:

That contract is why Gillis, reluctantly, let Ehrhoff go.

But, with the changes in the CBA that would require Buffalo to deal with the cap charges if he retires early, the contract is not an issue at all.

You'd be hard pressed to find a better D at a $4M cap hit.

But I doubt he would want to leave one mess in Buffalo for another one in Edmonton.

The cap recapture penalty follows the player which makes Ehrhoff less attractive.

Edit: Checked Ehrhoff's contract and it's only front-end loaded for the first 2 years so no worries. My bad.

Avatar
#68 Lochenzo
November 04 2013, 03:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I was refering to the assets we'd have to give up for Ehrhoff. 2014 and 2015 1st round picks should be off the table. 2014 because we're already projecting for a top 5 pick (yeehaw!) and 2015 because of Connor McDavid.

Buffalo doesn't have to deal Ehrhoff this year, if ever. They can afford to be patient and try to get somebody to overpay.

Avatar
#69 Cynic
November 04 2013, 03:59PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Keep gobbling, David S.

Avatar
#70 acg5151
November 04 2013, 05:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Ehrhoff has good possession numbers usually on an awful team. Prone to defensive errors and misses the net a lot - but a solid #1 option and power play quarterback. When he left Vancouver it left a void that wasn't filled until Jason Garrison. If the Sabres want to offload him, the Oilers could do a lot worse.

Avatar
#71 Tikkanese
November 05 2013, 09:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Sidd wrote:

Brian Burke was soo right about Kevin Lowe.

Wonder how Lowe feels now with Burke in his division.

Resign Kevin L do the Oilers fans a favor.

Maybe it is time to cheer for Calgary.

It is never time to cheer for Calgary. Ever.

Avatar
#72 Will
November 04 2013, 11:45AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I suppose the whole being a puck possession team isn't really working out too well without that top pairing defender. I hate to say it but I think it's time to look at moving one of the kids. I continue to hate to say it but I think you have to send out Yak.

I love what the kid brings to the team and his enthusiasm for Edmonton, but I think he could net something really solid on his pedigree and potential alone. I'm thinking Yandle out of Pheonix and picks.

Avatar
#73 They're $hittie
November 04 2013, 11:50AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Next Years D

Petry - Nurse

Schultz - Ference

Eblad - Klefbom

Belov

Useful pieces can be gotten out of Smid, and with those three young first round pick Dmen, we can afford to trade Marancin for 3rd line Help.

EDIT: However do not trade Marancin unless you draft Ekblad. If not look at moving pieces like Gernat, Lalegia, etc. I would wait on Gustafson as he is in Sweden and no one knows what to make of that league. Could have a player, or a dud.

Avatar
#74 Romulus' Apotheosis
November 04 2013, 11:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

http://www.capgeek.com/player/121

IIRC the problem with Ehrhoff (aside from the one DSF mentions) is similar to Weber's in one respect. The Sabres have already paid him a lot of cake in that upfront contract.

The other thing is that he is highly likely to retire before that contract expires and IIRC the Sabres would be on the hook for the recapture not the team he retires from. (IIRC where I read this).

Nikitin is a nice option and Belov knows him well. But he's going to be a UFA… that effects things.

Tyutin should be a target too.

Avatar
#75 pkam
November 04 2013, 02:26PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Lochenzo wrote:

I'm on board for acquiring Erhoff. A little leery of the price though. Buffalo is the only seller out there right now. Even Philly is still trying to make their current roster better in the Downie trade. Buffalo got a lot for Vanek.

The Oiler 1st round picks should be off the table. If the Oilers finish bottom 10 this year and also traded away their pick, that would be a disaster upon a disaster. And you can't trade the 2015 pick either. That's the Connor McDavid lottery.

I am not one bit worry about his contract. Erhoff is only 31 years old and he has 7 years left on his contract after this season. So he will be 38 in the last year of his contract. He should still be able to play if healthy. The worst part of his contract is the first 2 years. 4M now is already a great salary and cap hit, and in 2-3 years, 4M will be a steal. Not to mention the actual salary is just 1M in the last 3 year.

Didn't the Stars just signed Gonchar recently for 5M at age 39? Just imagine how much a 35+ defense will be in a few years.

Erhoff is more of a #2/3 defense, but he is better than all we have at the moment. If he is willing to come to Edmonton and only cost us a 1st round pick, I'll do it in a heartbeat. I'll take him over Phaneuf any day and didn't the Leafs fans say it will cost us Yakupov and some asset for Phaneuf.

Remember, it is a relatively weak draft class and no McDavid.

Avatar
#76 godot10
November 04 2013, 03:24PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:

Ehrhoff's been a pretty legitimate top-pair guy for years now. Vancouver won the Presidents' Trophy and went to Game Seven of the Stanley Cup Finals in a year where no other defenceman on the team played more minutes than Ehrhoff. There's also little evidence he's declining.

You could have said pretty much exactly the same thing when the Oilers acquired Lubomir Visnovsky; you would have been wrong then too.

My point was not the Ehrhoff was bad, it is just that with the hard cap and no ability to bury contracts anymore it is foolhardy to have two 30-something 2nd pairing D on eternally long contracts.

MacT could have traded for Ehrhoff in the summer instead of signing Ference. I would have been fine with that.

You can't have both though. Too risky. MacT got into bed, unfortunately, with Ference. Trending to 3rd pairing already after 15 games. 3 more year. NMC. Captain on the bench in all game critical situation leading from behind.

Avatar
#77 northof51
November 04 2013, 03:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@DSF

on Ehroff not wanting to leave Buffalo for our train wreck in Edmonton...

Do you know the details of his NMC and modified No Trade? I too doubt he'd want to come here if he didn't have to.

Avatar
#78 nunyour
November 05 2013, 09:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:
If MacTavish has done a reasonable job, then why are the Oilers last in the west?

Like you, I advocate changing GM's every 20 games. If they can't fix the team in that span FIRE THE DEAD WEIGHT.

If the players and the makeup of the team aren't good enough, then that falls on the GM.

Like you, I advocate wholesale personnel change every 20 games. That's how Chicago won, and by golly that's how Edmonton will do it.

If the coach isn't good enough, then that falls on the GM too.

Like you, I also advocate firing the coach every 20 games. If he can't get the job done in that span, he's clearly not good enough.

It is not Tambellini's fault either because the team has regressed since Tambellini's record.

Right. Steve Tambellini's Devan Dubnyk performed exactly the same as 2013-14 Devan Dubnyk.

Now: who's fault is it for MacTavish being GM?

I'd guess ownership...

Kevin Lowe.

Oh.

Now: Why is Kevin Lowe still in the organization after arguably the worst tenure in the NHL?

I'd guess because he got promoted upstairs and then when Steve Tambellini went and hired Pat Quinn and Nikolai Khabibulin it wasn't seen as Lowe's fault.

Because of patronage and the culture of entitlement that teems within the organization. There is no accountability.

Oh. Well Pat Quinn Kevin Prendergast Tom Renney Steve Tambellini Ralph Krueger, uh, Craig MacTavish will be happy to hear that.

That's the real problem with the Oilers that has undergirded the spectacular failure for the past 10 years.

Ten years?

Until that is fixed, more of the same.

And here I thought it was as simple as hiring a bad general manager and it taking time to fix that.

If we had a legit starting goalie to start the year we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Avatar
#79 2004Z06
November 05 2013, 10:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Cold Hard Truth wrote:

Oh really?

If MacTavish has done a reasonable job, then why are the Oilers last in the west?

If the players and the makeup of the team aren't good enough, then that falls on the GM.

If the coach isn't good enough, then that falls on the GM too.

It is not Tambellini's fault either because the team has regressed since Tambellini's record.

Now: who's fault is it for MacTavish being GM?

Kevin Lowe.

Now: Why is Kevin Lowe still in the organization after arguably the worst tenure in the NHL?

Because of patronage and the culture of entitlement that teems within the organization. There is no accountability.

That's the real problem with the Oilers that has undergirded the spectacular failure for the past 10 years.

Until that is fixed, more of the same.

So I take it from your comments that you were hoping the GM turn over the entire team in one summer?

He made 8 moves over the summer by my count. That in itself is huge compared to his predecessor.

5 of the 8 deals appear to be working out thus far (Belov, Gordon, Perron, Ference, Horcoff)

The draft arrows appear to be good as well. Nurse, Chase, Yakimov etc all appear to be on their way.

All in all say he has done a pretty good job.

He also agressively pursued a big top 6 forward (Clarkson), A goalie (Schneider, Raanta, Bernier, Bishop and rumor has it still after Hiller. He also actively pursued Coburn in Philly.

Contrary to what you may think, He knows what the problems are and is making efforts to fix them!

Comments are closed for this article.