TIGHTEN UP

Lowetide
December 24 2013 10:09AM

Sam Gagner has had a miserable six months. In late September, the young Oilers center suffered a significant injury and it has taken him forever to come back to something resembling normal. In fact, I'd wager most fans would agree with me in saying last night was the first time we got to see Gagner in his typical role: creative, offensive center with an ability to make plays and contribute to offense. It's been a long road.

IN THE BEGINNING

During the summer, new GM Craig MacTavish identified Gagner as a well-respected man about the Oiler room. This was an issue because there were some bad vibes in the locker room:

  • MacTavish: “It’s incumbent on everybody in that locker-room to really work to provide the type of working environment we want. The type of productive, hard-working, non-complaining culture we want. And I’m going to be diligent in my decision-making in terms of weeding out the complainers.”

The problem with Gagner has never been attitude or offense, but rather defense. After returning too early from the injury, Gagner was the culprit on a legion of goals-against and seemed to be ignoring responsibility and turning away from the slot while allowing free looks for opposition snipers. Galling for fans, and this had to be a major problem for the organization.

I mean, riddle me this: what action DO you take with a player known for intelligent play who is making simple, basic errors? The Oilers were extremely patient—too patient—before relegating him to limited duty on the fourth line. The play didn't improve, but the negative impact was reduced because he was now far from the important part of the game. 

Gagner's Corsi For % this season (5x5) is 47%, a smart improvement over last season's 42.9% (source: Extra Skater) which means he's heading in a better direction when on the ice, but these damn massive breakdowns are causing a frigging in the riggin'.

TIGHTEN UP 

Sam Gagner has never been known as a strong defensive center, and the problems he is encountering this season are his natural weakness. Last night, for the first time this season, Gagner wasn't wearing anything that might reduce his comfort and visibility.

It looked better. In my opinion. And I'm not alone.

  • Bruce McCurdy, Cult of Hockey: #89 Sam Gagner, 7. Strong 200-foot game that included some effective & committed own-zone play. Scored a beauty on a tic-tac-toe play. 11/18=61% on faceoffs.

That's a wonderful bit of prose, well-earned and a long time coming.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

I've always believed the worst time to give up on a player is when he's underperforming because of injury or another identifiable reason (I had to throw that in there because once upon a time Ron Low/Miro Satan). Gagner's performance last night suggests the new free range Gagner is back to last season's levels.

I remain convinced the Oilers should keep Gagner, although perhaps a move to wing is a better option than keeping him at center. Agree?

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on Team 1260.
Avatar
#1 ColourMeImpressed
December 24 2013, 10:12AM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Cheers
63
cheers

I am going to require more than a good performance against a struggling team on its second night of a back-to-back on the road, before I reverse my condemnation of Gagner.

He flat out cheated for points last year, not even trying defensively, to get his contract.

Avatar
#2 Citizen David
December 24 2013, 10:17AM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Cheers
26
cheers

Gagner playing his best is an effective player that can play on my team. The problem is our list of players we want to keep is getting really long which means that help will have to come from free agency, OKC, and personal development.

Avatar
#3 Ivan Drago
December 24 2013, 10:21AM
Trash it!
15
trashes
Cheers
49
cheers

Sure. Gagner can play on my team. On the wing. On the third line. At a reduced salary. Decent one-dimensional player. Not a fit for the needs of the team.

Avatar
#4 Ducey
December 24 2013, 10:28AM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
31
cheers

I'd leave him at center until they can upgrade with someone better. And no, Arcobello is not that player.

Your top 4 wingers going forward have to be Perron, Hall, Ebs, and Yak. They are all more dynamic players than Sam.

Ultimately, he is likely the guy that gets traded. Might as well let him build his value for the rest of the season.

Avatar
#5 Tay C
December 24 2013, 10:29AM
Trash it!
33
trashes
Cheers
23
cheers

He's had a different head coach every year he's been in the league and he still (somehow) manages to progress. His jaw has clearly been an issue all year, he'll be a heluva player yet, I think it should happen when he's still on my team.

Avatar
#6 Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)
December 24 2013, 10:40AM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
32
cheers

Play him at 2C....shelter his minutes.....then when he's hitting his stride. ....trade him at the deadline like you should have done with Hemsky last year!....Not because they aren't good players, but because they are redundant on our team and when they are healthy and playing well they have some value in the trade market.

However, I think that Oilers brass are a little desperate because of the current state of affairs (29th place team) and will not have the good sense and courage to trade a good player while he's playing good. On the bright side, we have no hope for a playoff push, so there is no need to retain veterans to support a playoff run like we did for that dismal 10 game stretch at the end of last season

So no LT, I do not agree. I sometimes think that the stats guys want to win the CORSI Cup while I want to win the Stanley Cup.

Avatar
#7 Eberle4MVP
December 24 2013, 10:50AM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Cheers
40
cheers

Id keep Hemmer over Gags. He isnt good enough to be on this team long term. He has talant and skill that another team would strongly benefit from, as an addition to a team with size, but we need to move some of the smurfs for some skilled size. He cant get anyone off the puck along the boards like Hemsky can, and a one-game sample of him actually back-checking is not a career made. He simply sucks defensively, and we need better characters to be able to defend since our blueline isnt exactly strong.

We are all guilty of wanting to run Hemsky out of town, but since hes shown that his shoulders are no longer made of glass, he is very much a great part of this team. Secondary scoring, fantastic hands, and a willingness to go into the rough areas, something maybe one or two other Oilers are willing to do.

Trade Gags, or dont re-sign him is my opinion. His role needs to be replaced with some more size.

Avatar
#8 nunyour
December 24 2013, 11:03AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
24
cheers

I will cut him some slack for the broken jaw,but that didn't stop him from back checking,he is to inconsistent,just like Hemsky,every once and awhile you see their A game,you need players that bring it every nite,especally when they make 5 mil a year.Watched a show last night,the coach was giving the team crap,said it's not my job to motivate you,motivate yourself!!!

Avatar
#9 Al 77
December 24 2013, 11:12AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
50
cheers

Sorry Lowetide one good game doesn't erase the 5 or 6 years worth of a sample size of bad face off %,and at best questionable decision making on the defensive end we have seen his entire career so far

Avatar
#10 Sizzay
December 24 2013, 11:16AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
48
cheers

LT,

I respectfully disagree on gagner. There are things to like but not at the point of keeping him. I wanted him traded At his high point last year.

Our top 6 is too small and similar. Nuge, hall, ebs, gagner, yakupov and Perron

We need a two way centre. It doesn't have to be an all star just a responsible player that can contribute 40 to 50 points, like gagner but also play D and add size.

I would much rather ship gagner out then yak or ebs.

Avatar
#11 Rama Lama
December 24 2013, 11:17AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
Eberle4MVP wrote:

Id keep Hemmer over Gags. He isnt good enough to be on this team long term. He has talant and skill that another team would strongly benefit from, as an addition to a team with size, but we need to move some of the smurfs for some skilled size. He cant get anyone off the puck along the boards like Hemsky can, and a one-game sample of him actually back-checking is not a career made. He simply sucks defensively, and we need better characters to be able to defend since our blueline isnt exactly strong.

We are all guilty of wanting to run Hemsky out of town, but since hes shown that his shoulders are no longer made of glass, he is very much a great part of this team. Secondary scoring, fantastic hands, and a willingness to go into the rough areas, something maybe one or two other Oilers are willing to do.

Trade Gags, or dont re-sign him is my opinion. His role needs to be replaced with some more size.

Hemmer is certainly a polarizing figure.........I love when he shows up, but because he plays an individual game, this is unreliable and hard to predict.

If Hemmer could add some upper body strength, he could really be more effective along the boards........right now there is too much pick pocket hockey in his game. We know he can take the punishment........I would like to see him give it for a change?

Maybe we could play him with Gazdic for added muscle and confidence?

Avatar
#12 season not played
December 24 2013, 11:22AM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
28
cheers

Should have traded his rights this past summer. His defficiencies as a player have been well documented.

Avatar
#13 MessyEH!
December 24 2013, 11:42AM
Trash it!
21
trashes
Cheers
29
cheers

Gagner is a turd, you just keep polishing him Lowetide.

I'd rather see him shipped out. His contract is what prevents him from being a second, or third line winger. Too much cash for a one demensional player. If he was 4 million instead of 5 I could see it. I would sign Hemsky to 4 million for 2 more years and trade Gagner for some reasonably priced depth players.

We need to trim the fat to afford a #1 Dmen. We also need some more actual NHL players who make less then 2 million a year.

Avatar
#14 David S
December 24 2013, 11:55AM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
24
cheers

Gagner's defensive liabilities wouldn't be near the problem we're seeing this year if we even had league average D. The fact we don't is simply magnifying his natural Achilles heel.

However D can be taught and from what I've seen, he's trying within the limits of a (very) difficult injury. As the season goes on and the new systems become instinctual and he fully heals, just watch him improve.

First night without the dog collar and he's a far better player. Yeah, small sample size but the difference was noticeable. Where did he score his goal last night? That's right, in the "high danger/greasy" part of town. And how many players do we have that'll go to those areas, you know, where most goals are scored?

All you guys are hot to trade a high value player (yes, he is), but if his game comes back and improves (which it will - he's 23 FFS) you better be sure you get fair value for the player he can be, not the player he's been for half an injury throttled season.

Avatar
#15 John Chambers
December 24 2013, 11:58AM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers

Gagner costs too much for a 2nd or 3rd line C.

I wouldn't trade him if the return was nothing, but in agreement with LT we need a different look for #2 C.

Avatar
#16 Rama Lama
December 24 2013, 12:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

Allan I was wondering if you could comment on the "strategy change", on the special teams?

Playing regular defencemen on the PP was a huge shift for Eakins and it paid off.......the PP looked very good with regular defencemen in stead of having a bunch of forwards out there. Same on the PK .......having a regular PK line was very effective .

I hope that this is a permanent change for the Oilers. It looked good by the eye and the score.

Avatar
#17 Spydyr
December 24 2013, 12:06PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers

Trade him as part of a package for either a top four defensmen or a real 2C.

Avatar
#18 David S
December 24 2013, 12:07PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers
John Chambers wrote:

Gagner costs too much for a 2nd or 3rd line C.

I wouldn't trade him if the return was nothing, but in agreement with LT we need a different look for #2 C.

Just curious. What's the average value of a 2LC who can bring you 50 points or so?

Avatar
#19 Spydyr
December 24 2013, 12:09PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
18
cheers
David S wrote:

Just curious. What's the average value of a 2LC who can bring you 50 points or so?

With a career minus sixty something?

Not 5 million.

A goal prevented is worth as much as a goal scored. There are better options on the Oilers to score. Not so many options in preventing them.

Avatar
#20 Serious Gord
December 24 2013, 12:10PM
Trash it!
20
trashes
Cheers
21
cheers

Should have traded his a$$ two years ago.

MacT should have traded him the day he (officially) became GM but instead he declared him to be a cornerstone player and signed him to a millstone contract.

Putting him on the wing is worse than useless - he's too small to dig for the puck. Third line centre on a top tier team at best.

Avatar
#21 David S
December 24 2013, 12:10PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

And I'm not talking about the average value of a 2LC regurgitated from the discard pile who might, MIGHT be as good as the one we already have.

And no, Arco at 20 or so games in isn't going to be the answer alot of you guys think he might be. At least not to a NHL GM making the call.

Avatar
#22 David S
December 24 2013, 12:12PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Spydyr wrote:

With a career minus sixty something?

Not 5 million.

A goal prevented is worth as much as a goal scored. There are better options on the Oilers to score. Not so many options in preventing them.

So what you're saying is you know more than MacT or he's basically unmovable, in which case this argument is moot.

Avatar
#23 Spydyr
December 24 2013, 12:13PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
22
cheers
David S wrote:

So what you're saying is you know more than MacT or he's basically unmovable, in which case this argument is moot.

Everyone is movable.

Gagner should have been moved years ago.

Avatar
#24 JJ
December 24 2013, 12:16PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Why does the URL say "landers-future" when the article is about Snowpants? I think someone dun goofed.. Unless there's some tomfoolery going on.

Avatar
#25 Taylor Gang
December 24 2013, 12:18PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
22
cheers

Trade Gagner to a team that is looking to sacrifice a two way centre for some offense

Avatar
#26 BLAKPOO
December 24 2013, 12:26PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers
Spydyr wrote:

With a career minus sixty something?

Not 5 million.

A goal prevented is worth as much as a goal scored. There are better options on the Oilers to score. Not so many options in preventing them.

Say what you want about Gagner, just don't back up your argument with +/- stats.

It cheapens us all.

Avatar
#27 gcw_rocks
December 24 2013, 12:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers

IF the Oilers keep Gagner, he should be moved to the wing. That said, this team needs to trade a forward for a defender and Gagner's name should be on the list of available players. Nothing about his game is so special the team couldn't survive without him, especially if the return is a top pairing defender.

Avatar
#28 OilClog
December 24 2013, 12:37PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Gags on the wing wouldn't be equal or an improvement to what we already have on the wing.. I would prefer he's moved to a new area code.

Avatar
#29 Alsker
December 24 2013, 12:39PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Sorry LT, I too am one of the many that has seen his song and dance act for too long. And yes David S. you can learn defense, tho Gags has not been able(willing) to so far in his career. Depending on MacT's view of the rebuild is what you do with him. If we are to wait for Nurse/Klef/etc. to develop, then you might as well keep him since his contract will expire before then. If the org. wants to move forward now then he has to part of a package to fill one of the holes we have.

Avatar
#30 The Soup Fascist
December 24 2013, 12:41PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
David S wrote:

And I'm not talking about the average value of a 2LC regurgitated from the discard pile who might, MIGHT be as good as the one we already have.

And no, Arco at 20 or so games in isn't going to be the answer alot of you guys think he might be. At least not to a NHL GM making the call.

This. ^

Good on Arco for his performance so far this season. But small sample size does not begin to cover it. Over the long haul I suspect we need a 2C with a bit more jam.

BTW. At what point does Social Services get called in when you abandon your young son two Christmases in a row? Maybe the Oilers have made me cynical but I am beginning think the basic premise for the Home Alone series of movies is not all that plausible.

Avatar
#31 a lg dubl dubl
December 24 2013, 12:47PM
Trash it!
19
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

Gagners FO % is what it is because he had wingers that don't help dig for the puck when it isn't won clean, I think this year is the first year since 06, that the wingers are helping the centerman to. Even RNHs FO% is up this year...or should we trade his ass too, y'know, because...

If Gagner can have a career of 60 pt seasons Im ok with that. Its Hall, Eberle, and Yak that I want to have 80-100 points years every year

Gagner, IMO should have been named captain. I like Ference but for a new guy coming into a new dressing room, seemed off.

Should he be on the wing, maybe, but until the Oilers can get the 6'2 220lb center that EVERY team wants, Frodo does the job on my books.

Merry Christmas ON!!

Avatar
#32 Spydyr
December 24 2013, 12:56PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers
BLAKPOO wrote:

Say what you want about Gagner, just don't back up your argument with +/- stats.

It cheapens us all.

Ummmm ,Stats=career minus sixty something

To be exact career -63 this year -15

It does mean something. It means he hurts his team more than he helps his team.

Yeah he is a keeper alright.

Avatar
#33 MessyEH
December 24 2013, 01:03PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

Agree completely, Gagner is over paid for what he is. Has never scored more then 50pts. Is not great at FOs, Defensively suspect, and paid one million too much. Better off trading him for real 3rd and 4th liners. Maybe we can get Cogs.

Avatar
#34 David S
December 24 2013, 01:04PM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

I'll go on record right now as saying the Gagner you'll see at the end of the year will be a player you cheer for every night. A gritty buzz bomb that'll get you 50-60 points a season, be around 50% on the dot and figure out the D part of the rink enough to become one of our core players. And then you'll all go ballistic when he throws in a Gagner scrap™.

Hey. It's the internet. You can get away with almost anything here. Am I right or am I right?

Avatar
#35 BLAKPOO
December 24 2013, 01:07PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers
Spydyr wrote:

Ummmm ,Stats=career minus sixty something

To be exact career -63 this year -15

It does mean something. It means he hurts his team more than he helps his team.

Yeah he is a keeper alright.

But it doesn't include special teams contributions, or specify line mates and match ups.

+/- is a garbage stat.

Avatar
#36 Spydyr
December 24 2013, 01:12PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers
BLAKPOO wrote:

But it doesn't include special teams contributions, or specify line mates and match ups.

+/- is a garbage stat.

If you cannot see Gagner is weak defensively nothing anyone says can change your opinion of him.

Avatar
#37 K_Mart
December 24 2013, 01:14PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers

Good game gags. Show me 40 good games and I'll care. Many of these players have had good games. Not many have played well for several in a row.

Avatar
#38 Ducey
December 24 2013, 01:38PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers
Spydyr wrote:

If you cannot see Gagner is weak defensively nothing anyone says can change your opinion of him.

And if you can't figure out the problems with +/- then you won't change yours either.

Here are a few hints:

1) Gagner came into the league as an 18 yr old. Young players struggle with defense. This tends to improve over time.

2)Gagner has played on a team intentionally trying to tank for rebuild purposes.

3) Gagner has played with other young players. See point 1.

The question is whether he will improve defensively. I think he will. His dad became a very good all round player after also being considered too small to play in the NHL.

Avatar
#39 They're $hittie
December 24 2013, 01:47PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers
Spydyr wrote:

If you cannot see Gagner is weak defensively nothing anyone says can change your opinion of him.

Has he ever played on a good team?

Here are a list of other players on the oilers that suck defensivly

Hall, Eberle, Hemsky, Yakupov, Jones, Gazdic, Jonesuu, J Schultz, Potter, Grebeshkov, Larsen, N Schultz,

Get the idea, There are not many players on the oilers who are plus since being here.

Also, Two years ago Sam lead the oilers in plus minus. I think it was his best season defensively. Was he the best forward defensively that year? Maybe but if you think not than your argument doesnt stand up.

Plus minus = dumb stat

Avatar
#40 Ed in PV
December 24 2013, 02:04PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
David S wrote:

I'll go on record right now as saying the Gagner you'll see at the end of the year will be a player you cheer for every night. A gritty buzz bomb that'll get you 50-60 points a season, be around 50% on the dot and figure out the D part of the rink enough to become one of our core players. And then you'll all go ballistic when he throws in a Gagner scrap™.

Hey. It's the internet. You can get away with almost anything here. Am I right or am I right?

To me a "buzz bomb" is a player who is very quick as you notice him darting around the ice. Are you expecting Santa to deliver him a new set of legs?

Avatar
#41 kale
December 24 2013, 02:58PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

Seiously Lowetide, did you not see Gags being tossed around in the corner like a rag doll last night? Have we not been discussing ad nauseum the need to be stronger down the middle-and all over quite frankly?

Avatar
#42 bwar
December 24 2013, 03:06PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I've been asking for Gagner to get moved to the wing all year. Will it happen? Absolutely not. Why? Because he was drafted as a center therefore must play center until the end of time.

Avatar
#43 etownman
December 24 2013, 03:06PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
Taylor Gang wrote:

Trade Gagner to a team that is looking to sacrifice a two way centre for some offense

Yes, like Henrique!

Avatar
#44 Fred
December 24 2013, 03:25PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

This is off topic, but why is DD ranked 177 in the NHL's top 200 fantasy players?

Avatar
#45 David S
December 24 2013, 03:28PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Ed in PV wrote:

To me a "buzz bomb" is a player who is very quick as you notice him darting around the ice. Are you expecting Santa to deliver him a new set of legs?

The games I was at last year when he was healthy and on the way to 38/48, he was ripping all over the place. He's alot faster than it looks like on TV. Maybe not Taylor "Cannonball" Hall fast, but pretty damn speedy all the same.

My prediction stands. You guys are gonna be surprised how much he's got it together at the end of this season. It'll be just about the time the annual Weber fantasy trade talks really hit.

Avatar
#46 admiralmark
December 24 2013, 03:40PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I could possibly see hanging on to Gagner if he is moved to wing. But we need a better option at 2C if we hope to start winning games against top 15 teams. In all likelihood he was brought up too early but the years that have now passed are enough for one to conclude Gagner is NEVER going to be defensively effective enough to play in the 2C spot. This team has a huge problem with hanging on to players waaaaaaay past the moment when they should be dealing them(Hemsky for e.g.). So I fully expect Gagner to stay. And we wonder why nothing changes?!

Avatar
#47 D
December 24 2013, 03:52PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers

Respectfully disagree as well LT.

It seems that Gagner has maxed out his potential, and it would be surprising if he had a major breakout that propelled him to 80-100 points. Move him as part payment for another piece of the puzzle.

Also, if he gets shifted to the wing, what is the risk with Yakupov and his ice time. Between Gagner and Yakupov, isn't it preferable to invest time and money into Yak?

Avatar
#48 David S
December 24 2013, 05:45PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
D wrote:

Respectfully disagree as well LT.

It seems that Gagner has maxed out his potential, and it would be surprising if he had a major breakout that propelled him to 80-100 points. Move him as part payment for another piece of the puzzle.

Also, if he gets shifted to the wing, what is the risk with Yakupov and his ice time. Between Gagner and Yakupov, isn't it preferable to invest time and money into Yak?

Sam Gagner was NEVER going to be a 80-100 point player. Taylor Hall MIGHT be one. Maybe.

Throwing up unrealistic performance goals to prove your point is just dumb.

Avatar
#49 S cottV
December 24 2013, 05:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Gagner is capable of playing some good games, mostly against lesser light teams, but is not the guy to help lead the charge in 2C, toward a future playoff position.

Explore trade possibilities involving Gagner in exchange for the key holes to fill.

In the meantime, sure - give him a good look on the wing - but I have my doubts...

Avatar
#50 S cottV
December 24 2013, 05:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Gagner is capable of playing some good games, mostly against lesser light teams, but is not the guy to help lead the charge in 2C, toward a future playoff position.

Explore trade possibilities involving Gagner in exchange for the key holes to fill.

In the meantime, sure - give him a good look on the wing - but I have my doubts...

Comments are closed for this article.