Nail Yakupov to be scratched again

Jonathan Willis
December 30 2013 12:34PM

 

Edmonton Oilers head coach Dallas Eakins announced this morning that Nail Yakupov will be a healthy scratch against the Phoenix Coyotes on Tuesday.

The Player

Nail Yakupov hasn’t been good enough this season.

His stats line shows that (39GP – 6G – 8A – 14PTS, minus-25), and the fact that he’s getting badly outplayed in the most sheltered minutes available is a real problem. The plus/minus exaggerates things (last year at five-on-five Yakupov’s on-ice save percentage was 0.923; this year it’s 0.868, and one would need to be delusional to think those numbers accurately reflect the state of Yakupov’s defensive game in those two seasons) but he’s been getting out-shot and out-chanced despite getting primarily offensive zone time.

He remains a phenomenally talented player, the guy who led both his team and all NHL rookies in goal-scoring last season. He’s fast and aggressive and has a shot that is already one of the best in the game. But he needs to dramatically improve his overall play to be a useful NHL’er.

The Coach

Dallas Eakins, understandably, feels that Yakupov needs to be better if he’s going to earn more ice-time, and that he can’t just keep gifting him with minutes if the results aren’t there.

“You’ve got to earn it,” he says in the video above. “You have to do a number of things on the ice every day. Every day. It can never change. We cannot give things to people. You have to earn them.”

Eakins further said he’d spoken to Yakupov for “40 to 45 minutes” about the scratch, and that he and the player had a “definite plan moving forward.”

Naturally, the coach is going to take some criticism for the scratch, as he took some criticism for sticking Yakupov on the fourth line and slashing the player’s power play role. It’s impossible not to recognize the talent that the Oilers have in that player, and naturally fans want to see him placed in a position to succeed.

Eakins, though, seems clearly focused on the big picture. A scratch here or there isn’t a big deal; Yakupov’s performance this season isn’t even the primary problem. Yakupov is the kind of player who has the talent to play a pivotal role for the Oilers for the next decade or more. The problem Eakins faces is turning him into the best possible player for that next decade, and if that means making unpopular decisions in a season that (like so many others) was lost before the halfway mark, that’s what it means.

Yakupov entered the NHL and had instant chemistry with his first head coach, Ralph Krueger. His enthusiasm was obvious and infectious and a bright point in an otherwise unmemorable season. But it’s worth remembering it for what it was – that despite Yakupov’s point totals, his line was out-shot game-in and game-out, and that all too often he seemed to be floating around on the ice with no clear idea of where he was supposed to be.

Perhaps Krueger would have been able to correct that with time, or perhaps not. Now the responsibility falls to Eakins. Improving Yakupov’s game might be the single most important thing Eakins does this season as Edmonton’s coach, and given that he’s previously compared Yakupov’s problems to the early struggles of people like Steven Stamkos and Joe Thornton it’s a good bet he knows it.

Recently by Jonathan Willis

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 joshgladu
December 30 2013, 12:39PM
Trash it!
75
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers

Thank god we scratched Yakupov. Might as well ship him out now for more toughness and guys who try really really hard but are ultimately useless like Luke Gazdic!!!

Avatar
#2 EricOG
December 30 2013, 12:39PM
Trash it!
51
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

And the first first overall pick out of town is: #64!!

Good luck signing the other Russians. But, alas, I am just a center ice fan, so what do i know??

Avatar
#3 6zeppelin6
December 30 2013, 12:44PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Cheers
147
cheers

I guess accountability only applies when you are russian.

Sam Gagner gets a free pass for his piss poor performance though.

Avatar
#4 fedUp
December 30 2013, 12:47PM
Trash it!
28
trashes
Cheers
71
cheers

Eakins is an idiot,

"I need him to score" how in the hell will he score with 6 minutes of ice on the 4th line.

If I here him say fitness level once more ill puke look what fitness level has got us last in the west.

Avatar
#5 Ducey
December 30 2013, 12:47PM
Trash it!
21
trashes
Cheers
47
cheers
EricOG wrote:

And the first first overall pick out of town is: #64!!

Good luck signing the other Russians. But, alas, I am just a center ice fan, so what do i know??

Not much

Avatar
#6 Cody Black
December 30 2013, 12:49PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
53
cheers

There is nothing wrong with a young player learning from the press box. Sometimes you just need to step back from the game and re-boot.

Avatar
#7 Thumby
December 30 2013, 12:53PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
96
cheers

What are Gagner's comparables like? I bet he deserves to sit and watch too.

Avatar
#8 Kr55
December 30 2013, 12:53PM
Trash it!
34
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Yak is just an easy target for Eakins. Lots of players deserved to be benched this year but most of them make too much money.

Barely playing and benching Yak may also be part of a bigger plan to keep his 2nd contract cheaper. We definitely can't afford another 6M/season forward. The season is already done, so might as well keep Yak off the scoresheet as much as possible so he has no ammo during discussions of an extension after this season.

Avatar
#9 Puck_In_Throat
December 30 2013, 12:54PM
Trash it!
24
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

@joshgladu

I cannot believe how many people do not see that you are being sarcastic.

Avatar
#10 bwar
December 30 2013, 12:56PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
29
cheers

I really thought Yak was starting to turn a corner these last few games. Best to blame all our problems on him and send him to the pressbox.

Avatar
#11 Nori know
December 30 2013, 12:57PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Cheers
56
cheers

Coach Eakins, is this a revenge on Yak for being out spoken? I see some other players who should be scratched before Yak. For instance, Sam, jr Shultz , Ebe, so on.....

Avatar
#12 Lochenzo
December 30 2013, 12:57PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
45
cheers

A little surprised given that the team is out of the playoff running already. I'd stick Yak on a line with Gordon and Smyth. Let those two take them under their wings and give him feedback on any shift where his performance or positioning is left wanting.

Gordon-Smyth-Hemsky has been a very good line as of late and I'd hate to break them up, but like I said, we're not playing for the playoffs anymore. Developing Yak should be the priority. I guess you could argue this will teach him accountability. But you could make that argument that some of the other young guns need that lesson too.

Avatar
#13 Dan the Man
December 30 2013, 01:03PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
74
cheers

I don't really have a big problem with Yakupov being scratched. He hasn't been good enough on most nights. I just wish Sam Gagner was held to the same level of accountability. I know it's tough to scratch him right now with Arcobello hurt but what about the rest of the season?

Avatar
#14 Dan the Man
December 30 2013, 01:05PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
23
cheers
Lochenzo wrote:

A little surprised given that the team is out of the playoff running already. I'd stick Yak on a line with Gordon and Smyth. Let those two take them under their wings and give him feedback on any shift where his performance or positioning is left wanting.

Gordon-Smyth-Hemsky has been a very good line as of late and I'd hate to break them up, but like I said, we're not playing for the playoffs anymore. Developing Yak should be the priority. I guess you could argue this will teach him accountability. But you could make that argument that some of the other young guns need that lesson too.

Yak did play with Gordon for a bit but the problem with that is Eakins likes to use Gordon for a most of the D zone draws and against tough competition which would be a huge problem with Yakupov on his wing.

Avatar
#15 Arius Mumin
December 30 2013, 01:07PM
Trash it!
32
trashes
Cheers
27
cheers

Eakins is a joke.

I wish one of those females with microphones in front of him had a set of testicles to actually ask a real question. I would really like to know more about this earned ice time and acountability Eakins speaks of, but everything has to be taken at face value and never questioned.

I am not an idiot and I do not believe Yak and Igor to be. I hope Yak demands a trade, get traded for the lowest possible value, then grows to be an elite on an actual NHL team and haunts Eakins corny ass for the rest of his corny career.

Avatar
#16 David S
December 30 2013, 01:07PM
Trash it!
15
trashes
Cheers
62
cheers

"The goal is to win every game."

*Continues placing 4th liners and AHL'ers with Eberle/Gagner. Lets Yak twist.*

F@ck you Dallas.

Avatar
#17 Ducey
December 30 2013, 01:11PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
30
cheers
bwar wrote:

I really thought Yak was starting to turn a corner these last few games. Best to blame all our problems on him and send him to the pressbox.

He has been playing better but he still looks lost in the neutral zone a lot.

He just kind of glides around. We heard about his speed in junior, but how often do you see it?

There is not a lot of back checking, shot blocking, going to dirty areas, etc.

With that shot he should bet trying to get off 3 or 4 more shots a game.

The question that should be asked is why isn't he getting farmed to OKC. A month dominating down there might do him a world of good.

Avatar
#18 ryan
December 30 2013, 01:12PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
35
cheers

@6zeppelin6

I agree 100% , coach s taking a hard line approach with one guy. Think of the free passes ebs and hall got in their first two years. This guy is getting no chances..........

How could he not be producing playing 6 minutes a night with gadzic ,the only thing owrse would be putting him with belanger lol

Avatar
#19 Arius Mumin
December 30 2013, 01:15PM
Trash it!
30
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Que Tengo Que Hacer

Pa' Que Vuelvas Conmigo

Vamos a Dejar El Pasado Atras

Para Mi La Vida No Tiene Sentido

Si Te Vas

Volver Yak

Avatar
#20 BC BOY
December 30 2013, 01:18PM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers

if yakupov was having this same performance under any other coach in the NHL do you think they would be babying him and hope that he gets better? Doubt it.

Don't see why people are freaking out over some tough love for yakupov. He's not going to become a better player by having it easy his whole career.

And people have to stop complaining about how Gagner doesn't get scratched. Eakins knows Ganger is a questionable a marginal 2C and he knows how talented and good yakupov is so to hold them to the same standard doesn't make sense.

Avatar
#21 Serious Gord
December 30 2013, 01:18PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers

As Johnathon alludes to - would yak thrive under a different coach?

I would further that question to: has any player played better under Eakins than they did under Krueger?

Gordon and Perrons performance don't count as they were playing under very differnent circumstances last years and thus are difficult to compare.

Avatar
#22 ColourMeImpressed
December 30 2013, 01:18PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
26
cheers

Jason,

When you look at Yakupov's line being outshot over and over, especially last year, did you ever look who his center was most of the season? Gagner.

Gagner is a shots-against sieve this year, and was even worse last year when - IMO - he was blatantly cheating for points.

What are Yak's non-Gagner results like, do you know?

Avatar
#23 A-Mc
December 30 2013, 01:19PM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Cheers
28
cheers

I dont understand the love that so many of you have for Yakupov.

Here are a few little fun facts:

1. The higher up the roster a player is, the tougher the competition is going to be for that player - GENERALLY SPEAKING. ex) Nuge plays much tougher competition than Lander or Acton.

2. Even on the 3rd or 4th line, Yakupov's line is being outplayed. read: Outplayed vs weak competition.

3. When Yak is put into the top 6, those lines don't perform as well. Also, he continues to fail to produce even with the good line mates.

Yakupov is a microcosm for our entire team. The Oilers have high offensive potential but they can't seem to figure out their defensive game. High Risk. This style of play is clearly enabling us to be picking top 5 for the 4th time in 5 years at the draft. The Oilers will move up the standings when they start playing better defensive hockey; Yakupov will move up the lines when he starts playing better defensive hockey.

Until then, both the Oilers and Yakupov will be bottom feeders. It's time to break the bad habits and it certainly looks like Eakin's is trying to do that. GJ Coach, keep it going.

Avatar
#24 Stack Pad Save
December 30 2013, 01:22PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers

Disappointing. This only makes my Goat Gagner look like an even better Goat choice.

Avatar
#25 Arius Mumin
December 30 2013, 01:23PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
18
cheers

@A-Mc

Most oppositions 4th lines are way better than Oilers 3rd line, and sometimes even the 2nd.

When you are playing on the worst line on the worst NHL team: what exactly is a sheltered minute?

Avatar
#26 Quintana
December 30 2013, 01:23PM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Arius Mumin wrote:

Que Tengo Que Hacer

Pa' Que Vuelvas Conmigo

Vamos a Dejar El Pasado Atras

Para Mi La Vida No Tiene Sentido

Si Te Vas

Volver Yak

Viva Yak city!!! Eakins cabron hijo de las mil putas!!!!

Avatar
#27 Lochenzo
December 30 2013, 01:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@Dan the Man

True that regarding Gordon. But I think that's the best way for Yak to learn the defensive side of the game. Play him in those situations with guys that know what they're doing. I'm confident Yak's offence will come around once he's mastered the basics. He definitely won't score if he's being benched.

I think we can also do some things to make Hall and Eberle more complete players. I think the turnovers have declined quite dramatically from earlier in the year, but they could be better on the backcheck.

Avatar
#28 -30-
December 30 2013, 01:25PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Nothing wrong with scratching a young player.

Didn't Eakins say that he WOULD make players responsible and that they would have to EARN their icetime?

I know some would suggest that others should be benched first but really, you can't bench the whole team at once.

Give the young guy some time to learn his role just like Kadri had to.

-30-

Avatar
#29 A-Mc
December 30 2013, 01:26PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers
Arius Mumin wrote:

Most oppositions 4th lines are way better than Oilers 3rd line, and sometimes even the 2nd.

When you are playing on the worst line on the worst NHL team: what exactly is a sheltered minute?

Even so, the competition is still easier on the 3/4 line as opposed to 1/2. Even if the Oilers' 3rd line was more like a teams 5th forward line (if there were such a thing), it still doesnt change the fact that Yakupov is failing vs competition that is weaker than the competition he'd face if he were in the top 6.

Avatar
#30 K_Mart
December 30 2013, 01:26PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
42
cheers
Cody Black wrote:

There is nothing wrong with a young player learning from the press box. Sometimes you just need to step back from the game and re-boot.

Couldn't agree more... Why is gagner playing?

Avatar
#31 DAVE
December 30 2013, 01:29PM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

Eakins it appears has a chip on his shoulder against anybody that might be more talented than him. His mentality is starting to get bizzare. Develope the kid in the NHL or devolope the kid in the AHL. Make up your schizo mind. You will both be better off.

Avatar
#32 sizzay
December 30 2013, 01:31PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

I think Ray Ferraro said it well with Anthony Mantha at the WJ tourney on the weekend.

He spoke about Mantha's 1 dimensional capability and lack of effort at times. He added that most coaches prefer 200 foot players but that last 60 feet (in the offensive zone) is most important. You need goals to win games.

I understand wanting to make Yakupov a 200 foot player, but that wasn't his game when we drafted him and it isn't likely going to be his game in the future.

This kid is a finisher who can dish good passes and is willing to throw the body. He is not a shot blocker, he is not a fighter, he is not a grinder.

Why not stick him with Gordon and Hall? He has good chemistry with Hall, and Gordon can cover their asses defensively.

Avatar
#33 steelymac
December 30 2013, 01:33PM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Cheers
32
cheers

Eakins lost the team with the double standards and he lost this fan as well.The arrogance he portrays is obvious and I cant stand looking at him on the bench.Last game Smyth played 10 more minutes than Yakupov,give the kid a chance to prove himself.Eakins ego seems to be more important than giving Yak the opportunity to succeed.Way to drive down the players value if they were going to trade him,wich I hope for Yaks sake they do.I work with a guy who feels the Oilers ruin young players and I have disagreed with him but as this crap carries on he may be right.Eakins got to this point coaching in the AHL where 90% of his team would never be good enough to make the NHL and here he is dumping on a kid who was the 1st overall in the entire draft.I know the koolaid consumers with trash this post and I could give 2 sh!ts if they do, but has Eakins made any of the kids better players so far this season?

Avatar
#34 A-Mc
December 30 2013, 01:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
sizzay wrote:

I think Ray Ferraro said it well with Anthony Mantha at the WJ tourney on the weekend.

He spoke about Mantha's 1 dimensional capability and lack of effort at times. He added that most coaches prefer 200 foot players but that last 60 feet (in the offensive zone) is most important. You need goals to win games.

I understand wanting to make Yakupov a 200 foot player, but that wasn't his game when we drafted him and it isn't likely going to be his game in the future.

This kid is a finisher who can dish good passes and is willing to throw the body. He is not a shot blocker, he is not a fighter, he is not a grinder.

Why not stick him with Gordon and Hall? He has good chemistry with Hall, and Gordon can cover their asses defensively.

That might work, but you'd need two solid 2way guys to go with him to make up for his 1-way game.

The Oilers dont really have any solid 2-way top 6 guys. Nuge is going to be decent one day, and Perron is good now.. That's about it. Hall, Ebs and Gagner (Especially the latter 2) aren't very good defensively.

So.. you're almost damned if you do and damned if you dont

Avatar
#35 ubermiguel
December 30 2013, 01:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

I saw some defensive improvement on Saturday (covering the pinching d-man's position, more skating the neutral zone), but except for about 2 or 3 rushes he was pretty much an offensive non-factor.

Avatar
#36 Arius Mumin
December 30 2013, 01:35PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
A-Mc wrote:

Even so, the competition is still easier on the 3/4 line as opposed to 1/2. Even if the Oilers' 3rd line was more like a teams 5th forward line (if there were such a thing), it still doesnt change the fact that Yakupov is failing vs competition that is weaker than the competition he'd face if he were in the top 6.

Eakins ist schweinlugner.

Wen unterstutzt du? Ich interssierre mich fur Oilers, nikht Eakins.

Avatar
#37 Rob...
December 30 2013, 01:38PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
30
cheers

I'm getting really sick of quotes from a coach who either lacks sincerity or calls it like he sees it but is completely delusional.

Our power play is a joke, our penalty killing is weak, just about every player we put on the ice is making turnover gaffs, but hey, why not go with a single whipping boy... that way you don't 'lose the room'.

Avatar
#38 Serious Gord
December 30 2013, 01:38PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers
steelymac wrote:

Eakins lost the team with the double standards and he lost this fan as well.The arrogance he portrays is obvious and I cant stand looking at him on the bench.Last game Smyth played 10 more minutes than Yakupov,give the kid a chance to prove himself.Eakins ego seems to be more important than giving Yak the opportunity to succeed.Way to drive down the players value if they were going to trade him,wich I hope for Yaks sake they do.I work with a guy who feels the Oilers ruin young players and I have disagreed with him but as this crap carries on he may be right.Eakins got to this point coaching in the AHL where 90% of his team would never be good enough to make the NHL and here he is dumping on a kid who was the 1st overall in the entire draft.I know the koolaid consumers with trash this post and I could give 2 sh!ts if they do, but has Eakins made any of the kids better players so far this season?

I'm feeling the same way. Well put.

And since we are out of the playoffs - why are we wasting valuable ice time on Smyth when he won't be part of this team's future?

Avatar
#39 Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)
December 30 2013, 01:44PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers
Puck_In_Throat wrote:

I cannot believe how many people do not see that you are being sarcastic.

I can't believe YOU cannot see how many people know he is being sarcastic and are trashing him anyway!

Avatar
#40 forsoothed
December 30 2013, 01:47PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
22
cheers

I have no problem with Yak getting benched, he needs to be better. My problem is with Eakins' definition of things like 'accountability' and 'earn your time'.

Example 1: Gagner; example 1a: Joensuu.

Avatar
#41 Rama Lama
December 30 2013, 01:51PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
18
cheers

I feel for Yaks but the bottom line is that he is not fit enough!

When he runs those stairs at Rexall after the games, he is using a body double. For those fans that think Yaks has been singled out for his poor play........remember when Hemsky use to be the turnover machine? I think that Mac T told him to smarten up and look where he is now.

Yaks needs to produce more with less ..........and hit and fight to boot. When he has learned all this then he should become more fit and learn how to compete better........like the rest of the team.

Avatar
#42 Ed in PV
December 30 2013, 01:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Gregor, I don't get your comment about Yak" already having one of the best shots in the league." I see his shooting% is about 8%, which is not good. When he gets his shot off it is very hard, but he misses the net too often and really struggles being able to adjust himself to get his shot off with anything less than a perfect pass. More often that getting a good shot on net he has either missed the net or fanned the shot. I'll grant that when he hit's one it goes hard, but I think having "one of the best shots in the league" is more than just speed.

I hope this is the 1st step and he spends the 2nd half of the year in OKC. Not as a punishment but because he needs to work on his game. I recall that Spezza was a number 1 who spent a year in Jr and most of his 1st 2 years of pro in the AHL. Spending some time in the AHL is not the end of his career.

Avatar
#43 Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)
December 30 2013, 01:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers
Arius Mumin wrote:

Most oppositions 4th lines are way better than Oilers 3rd line, and sometimes even the 2nd.

When you are playing on the worst line on the worst NHL team: what exactly is a sheltered minute?

So what you're saying is that the only real way to shelter him is to send to the AHL for awhile so he can get way more minutes, learn the defensive side of the game and gain some confidence....I think you're on to something there!

Avatar
#44 Arius Mumin
December 30 2013, 01:59PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty) wrote:

So what you're saying is that the only real way to shelter him is to send to the AHL for awhile so he can get way more minutes, learn the defensive side of the game and gain some confidence....I think you're on to something there!

I didn't say that, I asked a question.

The way you pay attention-you could be a 2C on Eakins team.

Avatar
#45 Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)
December 30 2013, 02:00PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
21
cheers

And why is everyone talking to Jason Gregor?....this is a Jonathan Willis article.

Avatar
#46 Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)
December 30 2013, 02:03PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Arius Mumin wrote:

I didn't say that, I asked a question.

The way you pay attention-you could be a 2C on Eakins team.

You need to pay a little more attention yourself there Arius....I was playing a little trick on you there....putting words in your mouth....read it a couple of more times...let me know when you get it.....then we can move on.

Avatar
#47 **
December 30 2013, 02:07PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

Eakins is using Yakupov as a scape goat to "show" the public he is all about accountability. Gagner is playing much worse when his numbers are adjusted for games played and still sees prime time. If they are really about developing send him to the AHL, don't use him as the pinata when the coach fails to ice a competitive team.

Avatar
#48 wintoon
December 30 2013, 02:07PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers

I have no problem with Yakupov being benched if it is for long term development purposes. In the long run it should pay dividends. However, Gagner is a veteran centre. As a veteran and a centre he should be held even more accountable than a raw rookie. The problem is that I have seen him being gifted ice time rather than being held accountable. To me that is an injustice and is simply not fair to the team. Eakins needs to be perceived as fair or he will lose the room.

Avatar
#49 Arius Mumin
December 30 2013, 02:10PM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty) wrote:

You need to pay a little more attention yourself there Arius....I was playing a little trick on you there....putting words in your mouth....read it a couple of more times...let me know when you get it.....then we can move on.

I'm not a baby or a woman, if there is anything going into my mouth it is because I really want it there.

If I want people trying to trick me: I'd go listen to a Eakins press conference.

Avatar
#50 meh...
December 30 2013, 02:10PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers

First,I like Yakupov.The upside on him has to be considered as huge.

Yakupov has not played well.

Yakupov would benefit greatly from some quality ice time in the minors in all types of situations in all types of game conditions.Winning,losing,power play, last minutes of games etc

The argument that he may bolt for the KHL if sent to the minors is weak. If the kid wants to leave because he gets sent to the minors to improve his ability, then who cares if he leaves???? 20 year old rookies don't get to make ultimatums to the teams that draft them, whether they are from Russia or Vegreville.

I don't believe he'd want to leave for the Motherland just because a trip to Oklahoma City for more ice time was prescribed for his over-all improvement.

It is the job of the General Manager to make these decisions and then to convey these messages to players, especially young,struggling players.That means our leadership needs to lead.

Please, MacT, I'm begging you...lead.

Comments are closed for this article.