Nail Yakupov to be scratched again

Jonathan Willis
December 30 2013 12:34PM

 

Edmonton Oilers head coach Dallas Eakins announced this morning that Nail Yakupov will be a healthy scratch against the Phoenix Coyotes on Tuesday.

The Player

Nail Yakupov hasn’t been good enough this season.

His stats line shows that (39GP – 6G – 8A – 14PTS, minus-25), and the fact that he’s getting badly outplayed in the most sheltered minutes available is a real problem. The plus/minus exaggerates things (last year at five-on-five Yakupov’s on-ice save percentage was 0.923; this year it’s 0.868, and one would need to be delusional to think those numbers accurately reflect the state of Yakupov’s defensive game in those two seasons) but he’s been getting out-shot and out-chanced despite getting primarily offensive zone time.

He remains a phenomenally talented player, the guy who led both his team and all NHL rookies in goal-scoring last season. He’s fast and aggressive and has a shot that is already one of the best in the game. But he needs to dramatically improve his overall play to be a useful NHL’er.

The Coach

Dallas Eakins, understandably, feels that Yakupov needs to be better if he’s going to earn more ice-time, and that he can’t just keep gifting him with minutes if the results aren’t there.

“You’ve got to earn it,” he says in the video above. “You have to do a number of things on the ice every day. Every day. It can never change. We cannot give things to people. You have to earn them.”

Eakins further said he’d spoken to Yakupov for “40 to 45 minutes” about the scratch, and that he and the player had a “definite plan moving forward.”

Naturally, the coach is going to take some criticism for the scratch, as he took some criticism for sticking Yakupov on the fourth line and slashing the player’s power play role. It’s impossible not to recognize the talent that the Oilers have in that player, and naturally fans want to see him placed in a position to succeed.

Eakins, though, seems clearly focused on the big picture. A scratch here or there isn’t a big deal; Yakupov’s performance this season isn’t even the primary problem. Yakupov is the kind of player who has the talent to play a pivotal role for the Oilers for the next decade or more. The problem Eakins faces is turning him into the best possible player for that next decade, and if that means making unpopular decisions in a season that (like so many others) was lost before the halfway mark, that’s what it means.

Yakupov entered the NHL and had instant chemistry with his first head coach, Ralph Krueger. His enthusiasm was obvious and infectious and a bright point in an otherwise unmemorable season. But it’s worth remembering it for what it was – that despite Yakupov’s point totals, his line was out-shot game-in and game-out, and that all too often he seemed to be floating around on the ice with no clear idea of where he was supposed to be.

Perhaps Krueger would have been able to correct that with time, or perhaps not. Now the responsibility falls to Eakins. Improving Yakupov’s game might be the single most important thing Eakins does this season as Edmonton’s coach, and given that he’s previously compared Yakupov’s problems to the early struggles of people like Steven Stamkos and Joe Thornton it’s a good bet he knows it.

Recently by Jonathan Willis

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#51 **
December 30 2013, 02:14PM
Trash it!
21
trashes
Cheers
71
cheers

Yakupov is going to end up asking for a trade, sent to a contender, end up having a great career, meanwhile the Oilers will still be bottom five for the next 4 years. Eakins is not going to take this team anywhere.

Avatar
#52 **
December 30 2013, 02:17PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
66
cheers

There are 5 other guys on the ice every time Yakupov is burned for a chance against. How come it is only his bad play that sticks out to the coach?. On a contending team Yakupov would be used for what he is, a goal scoring forward. There would be a good goalie, 2 soild defencemen, a responsible 2 way center, and another great forward. Yakupov would eventually get decent enough defensively. But on a sinking ship, it's hard to learn to swim when all your shipmates are going down with the ship.

Avatar
#53 RexHolez
December 30 2013, 02:22PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
69
cheers

Yakupov needs Ice time in all situations to learn and grow. This is a ridiculous move and Eakins just keeps getting harder and harder to support.

Avatar
#54 Ed in PV
December 30 2013, 02:24PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
** wrote:

There are 5 other guys on the ice every time Yakupov is burned for a chance against. How come it is only his bad play that sticks out to the coach?. On a contending team Yakupov would be used for what he is, a goal scoring forward. There would be a good goalie, 2 soild defencemen, a responsible 2 way center, and another great forward. Yakupov would eventually get decent enough defensively. But on a sinking ship, it's hard to learn to swim when all your shipmates are going down with the ship.

So are you suggesting that the only move the Oil have left is the "shelter him" in OKC?

Avatar
#55 DAVE
December 30 2013, 02:25PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
meh... wrote:

First,I like Yakupov.The upside on him has to be considered as huge.

Yakupov has not played well.

Yakupov would benefit greatly from some quality ice time in the minors in all types of situations in all types of game conditions.Winning,losing,power play, last minutes of games etc

The argument that he may bolt for the KHL if sent to the minors is weak. If the kid wants to leave because he gets sent to the minors to improve his ability, then who cares if he leaves???? 20 year old rookies don't get to make ultimatums to the teams that draft them, whether they are from Russia or Vegreville.

I don't believe he'd want to leave for the Motherland just because a trip to Oklahoma City for more ice time was prescribed for his over-all improvement.

It is the job of the General Manager to make these decisions and then to convey these messages to players, especially young,struggling players.That means our leadership needs to lead.

Please, MacT, I'm begging you...lead.

well said, but the player agents have a vested intrest. 10% OF 3 mill is not the same as 10% of playing in the minors. Your ledger looks a little weaker at the end of the year.

Avatar
#56 Newj
December 30 2013, 02:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
22
cheers

Where's MacTavish,Lowe & Howson in all this? Do they see the same as Eakins?

For me this is as much about how MacT & Klowe & Howson might address these types of hockey operation issues. These are big considerations at stake here & I sure hope they don't screw this up too.

Yes Eakins make the call but its not with an approval from 1 of those those 3.

I hope this works out as intended...sign me skeptical.

Avatar
#57 **
December 30 2013, 02:29PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
45
cheers
Serious Gord wrote:

As Johnathon alludes to - would yak thrive under a different coach?

I would further that question to: has any player played better under Eakins than they did under Krueger?

Gordon and Perrons performance don't count as they were playing under very differnent circumstances last years and thus are difficult to compare.

I think you're full of s%$t 90% of the time, but that other 10% like this comment is always solid.

Krueger should've got the benefit of a full season. Forget Yakupov for a moment, the PP and PK were elite under Krueger and they are in the sewer now under Eakins, even with a better (at least on paper) roster and the benefit of a full pre season.

Avatar
#58 Kr55
December 30 2013, 02:36PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
47
cheers

The only reason to treat a top prospect like this is if your team is very successful and you need the kid to catch up to the level of play everyone else is at, like Seguin in Boston. That is not at all the situation with the Oilers.

We all remember Hall/Ebs and Nuge getting sheltered minutes, allowed to neglect defense to gain confidence in their offensive game. Yak is never going to get that time from the looks of it. So, what you end up with is an offensive talent that isn't even sure he can score at this level anymore. All aspects of his game are going to struggle. Eventually he will turn it around I'm sure, but it's going to take a lot longer than it should have, and the chances Yak will bolt as soon as he is UFA skyrocket because of this treatment he's getting. Doubt we get to see Yak's prime while he wears an Oilers uniform.

Avatar
#59 BIGDAWG
December 30 2013, 02:37PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
22
cheers

That's it..Bench him again.. cause it was alllll Yaks fault the TEAM did squat for the better part of 2 and a half periods vs philly and did the absolute minimum vs the flames... This word accountability is a bunch of horse sheet... there are other players to bench not just petry, smyth and yak.......why did we get rid of Fistric and brown and smid again?? grit toughness and a lil bit of nasty... ya we don't need that at all... I have the Oilers logo and the nations logo on my truck......I really wish this team would get some friggin balls....and why is it that the coach says one thing and the team does nothing or the opposite?? I am really starting to wonder.. AND the I don't care factor is starting to creep in.. I can handle baby steps but I cant stand regression..

Avatar
#60 BIGDAWG
December 30 2013, 02:37PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

That's it..Bench him again.. cause it was alllll Yaks fault the TEAM did squat for the better part of 2 and a half periods vs philly and did the absolute minimum vs the flames... This word accountability is a bunch of horse sheet... there are other players to bench not just petry, smyth and yak.......why did we get rid of Fistric and brown and smid again?? grit toughness and a lil bit of nasty... ya we don't need that at all... I have the Oilers logo and the nations logo on my truck......I really wish this team would get some friggin balls....and why is it that the coach says one thing and the team does nothing or the opposite?? I am really starting to wonder.. AND the I don't care factor is starting to creep in.. I can handle baby steps but I cant stand regression..

Avatar
#61 **
December 30 2013, 02:40PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
A-Mc wrote:

I dont understand the love that so many of you have for Yakupov.

Here are a few little fun facts:

1. The higher up the roster a player is, the tougher the competition is going to be for that player - GENERALLY SPEAKING. ex) Nuge plays much tougher competition than Lander or Acton.

2. Even on the 3rd or 4th line, Yakupov's line is being outplayed. read: Outplayed vs weak competition.

3. When Yak is put into the top 6, those lines don't perform as well. Also, he continues to fail to produce even with the good line mates.

Yakupov is a microcosm for our entire team. The Oilers have high offensive potential but they can't seem to figure out their defensive game. High Risk. This style of play is clearly enabling us to be picking top 5 for the 4th time in 5 years at the draft. The Oilers will move up the standings when they start playing better defensive hockey; Yakupov will move up the lines when he starts playing better defensive hockey.

Until then, both the Oilers and Yakupov will be bottom feeders. It's time to break the bad habits and it certainly looks like Eakin's is trying to do that. GJ Coach, keep it going.

YOur first point is just plain uninformed. Gordon plays the tough minutes. Comparing Nuge with Lander or Yak is like comparing Potter with Shea Webber or Ryan Sutter.

Second point, again, misinformed, because, again, Gordon plays third line.

Third point, difficult to asses on black and white. Yakupov played on those lines sometimes against tougher teams where none of his line mates did scrap. Goaltending was also horrible during some of those games, so don't blame it on Yakupov alone.

Next time please learn the difference between fact and opinion

Avatar
#62 RexHolez
December 30 2013, 02:42PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
47
cheers

This is getting me more pissed off the more I think about this!! Just when you think the bottom of the pathetic barrel has been reached you realize we have an AHL coach ruining the career and spirit of our beloved Yak!! I need to stop keeping tabs on this sad sack of misery

Avatar
#63 40 Double D
December 30 2013, 02:42PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
48
cheers

Just play the kid. Ovechkin leads the league in goals and he's still -14.

Avatar
#64 **
December 30 2013, 02:45PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Quintana wrote:

Viva Yak city!!! Eakins cabron hijo de las mil putas!!!!

Yak city: ganar, o morir.

Avatar
#65 **
December 30 2013, 02:47PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
21
cheers
DAVE wrote:

Eakins it appears has a chip on his shoulder against anybody that might be more talented than him. His mentality is starting to get bizzare. Develope the kid in the NHL or devolope the kid in the AHL. Make up your schizo mind. You will both be better off.

I was thinking the same things.

Avatar
#66 Taylor Gang
December 30 2013, 02:48PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Ed in PV wrote:

Gregor, I don't get your comment about Yak" already having one of the best shots in the league." I see his shooting% is about 8%, which is not good. When he gets his shot off it is very hard, but he misses the net too often and really struggles being able to adjust himself to get his shot off with anything less than a perfect pass. More often that getting a good shot on net he has either missed the net or fanned the shot. I'll grant that when he hit's one it goes hard, but I think having "one of the best shots in the league" is more than just speed.

I hope this is the 1st step and he spends the 2nd half of the year in OKC. Not as a punishment but because he needs to work on his game. I recall that Spezza was a number 1 who spent a year in Jr and most of his 1st 2 years of pro in the AHL. Spending some time in the AHL is not the end of his career.

Spezza was actually number 2 to Kovalchuk. Other than that I agree with you.

Avatar
#67 نفسه
December 30 2013, 02:53PM
Trash it!
39
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers

إذا yakupov كان لها هذا الأداء نفسه تحت أي مدرب آخر في NHL تظن أنها سوف babying له، ونأمل أن يحصل على أفضل؟ أشك في ذلك.

لا أرى لماذا الناس ينقط خارجا على بعض الحب القاسي للyakupov. وقال انه لن يصبح لاعبا أفضل من خلال وجود من السهل مسيرته بأكملها.

وعلى الناس أن تكف عن الشكوى حول كيفية Gagner لا يحصل خدش. إيكنز يعرف رئيس عمال هو مشكوك في 2C هامشية ويعرف كيف موهوب وجيد yakupov هو ذلك عقد لهم نفس المستوى لا معنى له.

Avatar
#68 mikedub
December 30 2013, 02:57PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
23
cheers

@**

Sure Yak would probably be a better player on a contending team, most of the Oilers would. They would be utilized to compliment their skill sets or sent down to the minors to fully develop into the player the organization wants them to be. The Oilers management obviously doesn't roll like that. He's barely surpassed a full nhl season, I say, you want to teach him how to play better defensively? Put him out there with Gordon in those situations. What do the Oilers have to lose? More games? They already do that with or without him in the press box. he's not going to learn anything sitting up there all pissed off. We had patience with the other kids and still have it with Gagner. Let him learn while playing.

Avatar
#69 Freewheeling Freddie
December 30 2013, 02:57PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
55
cheers

How does a player who makes 4.8 million and has several mistake filled games never has to ride the pine? A twenty year old who has less then 1 season under his belt and can actually shot the puck will be sitting out for the third time. This is completely mind boggling. I guess that is why we sit in the sewer hole at 29th

Avatar
#70 Turnover
December 30 2013, 03:02PM
Trash it!
29
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers
** wrote:

Yakupov is going to end up asking for a trade, sent to a contender, end up having a great career, meanwhile the Oilers will still be bottom five for the next 4 years. Eakins is not going to take this team anywhere.

Yakupov will likely never get sent to a contender. Contenders roll four responsible lines. With responsible people. Yakupov is not a responsible player. In fact very irresponsible.

The biggest problem Yakupov has, along with numerous posters here, is, he's nowhere near as good as he, or you believes he is. Another Tyler Seguin. Wants to be "the star". Good competitive teams don't care who gets the points. They play to win as a team. If they are trying to build a team here, and I do believe they are, he don't fit right now.

I also believe he's heading back to the KHL if he doesn't get treated as the baby he is.

I am not a big fan of Eakins, but I am a supporter of this move. Keep him out for a few games. If he still hasen't decided to play a team game, move his ass. We need people who believe in competing as a group.

Make that bold move. If you can find a partener to dance with.

Avatar
#71 **
December 30 2013, 03:15PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers
نفسه wrote:

إذا yakupov كان لها هذا الأداء نفسه تحت أي مدرب آخر في NHL تظن أنها سوف babying له، ونأمل أن يحصل على أفضل؟ أشك في ذلك.

لا أرى لماذا الناس ينقط خارجا على بعض الحب القاسي للyakupov. وقال انه لن يصبح لاعبا أفضل من خلال وجود من السهل مسيرته بأكملها.

وعلى الناس أن تكف عن الشكوى حول كيفية Gagner لا يحصل خدش. إيكنز يعرف رئيس عمال هو مشكوك في 2C هامشية ويعرف كيف موهوب وجيد yakupov هو ذلك عقد لهم نفس المستوى لا معنى له.

@BC Bear: "

if yakupov was having this same performance under any other coach in the NHL do you think they would be babying him and hope that he gets better? Doubt it.

Don't see why people are freaking out over some tough love for yakupov. He's not going to become a better player by having it easy his whole career.

And people have to stop complaining about how Gagner doesn't get scratched. Eakins knows Ganger is a questionable a marginal 2C and he knows how talented and good yakupov is so to hold them to the same standard doesn't make sense."

Why do you repost in a different language?, are you one of those people who live half way accross the world and get paid to post comments online?, and you just forgot to translate your post?

Avatar
#72 Butters
December 30 2013, 03:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
37
cheers

I hope Dallas doesn't leave so big a mess that Coach Horcoff can't clean it up.

Avatar
#73 Kr55
December 30 2013, 03:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers
Butters wrote:

I hope Dallas doesn't leave so big a mess that Coach Horcoff can't clean it up.

It's going to be tough. We might have to wait until GM Horcoff makes an appearance.

Avatar
#74 Butters
December 30 2013, 03:26PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers
Turnover wrote:

Yakupov will likely never get sent to a contender. Contenders roll four responsible lines. With responsible people. Yakupov is not a responsible player. In fact very irresponsible.

The biggest problem Yakupov has, along with numerous posters here, is, he's nowhere near as good as he, or you believes he is. Another Tyler Seguin. Wants to be "the star". Good competitive teams don't care who gets the points. They play to win as a team. If they are trying to build a team here, and I do believe they are, he don't fit right now.

I also believe he's heading back to the KHL if he doesn't get treated as the baby he is.

I am not a big fan of Eakins, but I am a supporter of this move. Keep him out for a few games. If he still hasen't decided to play a team game, move his ass. We need people who believe in competing as a group.

Make that bold move. If you can find a partener to dance with.

Whether your work a drill press, or play pro hockey, you want to be treated fairly by your employer. Some of us see that there are others who are equally worthy of having a seat in popcorn row.

Yakupov uprooted his whole family to come to NA. Unless he has no other choice, he isn't going to the KHL.

I am worried we are going down the same path that the Oilers went down with Miro Satan, amongst others, except Yak is a better player than Miro.

Avatar
#75 EricOG
December 30 2013, 03:27PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers
Ducey wrote:

Not much

I love it when six rings sends one of his cronies to reply to comments.

Avatar
#76 Cain
December 30 2013, 03:29PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
23
cheers

@Butters

As if the Oilers would be stupid enough to bring back an ex-player to be a coach or GM...how dumb do you think they are...er...um...never mind.

Avatar
#77 **
December 30 2013, 03:30PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

We are all looking at this the wrong way. I just figured it out. Sitting Yak is the Oilers way of officially throwing the towel. "we might as well sit Yak, no need for him to get hurt, let's keep him fresh for next season". PS: I'm being sarcastic

Avatar
#78 merfer
December 30 2013, 03:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
22
cheers
Butters wrote:

I hope Dallas doesn't leave so big a mess that Coach Horcoff can't clean it up.

Well the Oiler GM, Kelly Buchburger, will give Horcoff a 6 year contract so that he has enough time to get his system in place. It's the smart thing to do.

Avatar
#79 Rama Lama
December 30 2013, 03:48PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers
meh... wrote:

First,I like Yakupov.The upside on him has to be considered as huge.

Yakupov has not played well.

Yakupov would benefit greatly from some quality ice time in the minors in all types of situations in all types of game conditions.Winning,losing,power play, last minutes of games etc

The argument that he may bolt for the KHL if sent to the minors is weak. If the kid wants to leave because he gets sent to the minors to improve his ability, then who cares if he leaves???? 20 year old rookies don't get to make ultimatums to the teams that draft them, whether they are from Russia or Vegreville.

I don't believe he'd want to leave for the Motherland just because a trip to Oklahoma City for more ice time was prescribed for his over-all improvement.

It is the job of the General Manager to make these decisions and then to convey these messages to players, especially young,struggling players.That means our leadership needs to lead.

Please, MacT, I'm begging you...lead.

Probably the best comment here in quite a while!

Avatar
#80 Rick Stroppel
December 30 2013, 04:01PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers

(1) I know I have ragged on Eakins pretty good, but consider this. Some of us get to see the game in person. Some of us (like me) only get to see the game on TV, where all you see generally is the guy with the puck and two or three players around him. Eakins gets to see THE ENTIRE ICE SURFACE for every game and every practice. Eakins wants to win. The reason Yakupov is playing seven minutes is that Eakins believes they have a better chance to win when Yakupov is playing 7 minutes, not 20 minutes. (2) I agree a stint in the AHL may be a good idea BUT(a)apparently they were not able to teach Omark how to play defence down there, and (b) what if Yakupov totally lights it up against inferior competition, he may become even more convinced that the only thing he needs to worry about is offence. (3) Recently Yakupov publicly said something like, "I don't like to backcheck, I don't like to play without the puck". Yeah, I know, language barrier. Did anybody (like Larionov) explain to him what those comments meant? Did Yakupov apologize or backtrack? Nope. (4) Yakupov is clearly involved in a war of wills with the coach. If you allow a player to win a war like this, your team is doomed. (5) Two words: "Alexandre Daigle" I am not saying this because I WANT this to happen. But if Yakuov refuses to listen he should be traded, and quickly, while he still has the cachet of a number one overall pick.

Avatar
#81 A-Mc
December 30 2013, 04:20PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@**

Nuge vs Lander was comparing the quality of competition they face, which obviously is much different. That was the Point, but you missed it. If Yak was with Nuge, he'd face much harder opposition than if he was with Lander.

The whole Gordon portion of what you're saying doesn't really matter. The normal mode of operation is that lines are matched and therefore, the 1st and 2nd lines are seeing tougher competition than the 3rd and 4th lines.

I was going to type up a nice long factual post with real numbers and everything, to refute your response, but in the end it isn't worth it. What i said IS fact and also some Opinion.

Obviously I'm not too far off base because the coach seems to think Yak isn't doing so well either.

Avatar
#82 Rick Stroppel
December 30 2013, 04:43PM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers
ryan wrote:

I agree 100% , coach s taking a hard line approach with one guy. Think of the free passes ebs and hall got in their first two years. This guy is getting no chances..........

How could he not be producing playing 6 minutes a night with gadzic ,the only thing owrse would be putting him with belanger lol

So Eberle and Hall got "free passes" in their first two years did they? Please look back in their careers and see if they did the following over a forty game period, half a season, in the NHL:

(1) Fourteen points.

(2) One (Two?) even strength goals.

(3) Minus 25.

(4) Publicly says he doesn't like to play defence.

(5) Allows his agent to come to town and gripe. Rather like the parent in Pee Wee hockey who complains to coach that Sonny Boy is not getting enough ice time.

Yakupov is not being singled out. He deserves everything he is getting.

Avatar
#83 Fatbob24
December 30 2013, 05:00PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
** wrote:

YOur first point is just plain uninformed. Gordon plays the tough minutes. Comparing Nuge with Lander or Yak is like comparing Potter with Shea Webber or Ryan Sutter.

Second point, again, misinformed, because, again, Gordon plays third line.

Third point, difficult to asses on black and white. Yakupov played on those lines sometimes against tougher teams where none of his line mates did scrap. Goaltending was also horrible during some of those games, so don't blame it on Yakupov alone.

Next time please learn the difference between fact and opinion

Why? this site is based on opinion, hardly ever fact. Push off.

Avatar
#84 dv.asteroid
December 30 2013, 05:13PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers

New plan...don't bench yak...fire coach...fire assistant coaches. ...re hire coach as assistant...hire Mess as coach. And fire gags.

Avatar
#85 me
December 30 2013, 05:38PM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Who cares? Get a life of your own and stop pretending any of you know jack squat. You don't play for the team...losers.

Avatar
#86 Sliderule
December 30 2013, 05:41PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
26
cheers

This is so stupid it could make you cry.

Hall is the turnover machine.

Gagner is the I can't find a man,

Eberle is the what is this defence crap.

Then we have the assistant coach who doesn't like euros and the head coach who is just trying to save his job by listening to feedback from his cronies.

We are ending up with Yak being Seguin or Nediereiter givin away for a song because we have no brains .

Avatar
#87 **
December 30 2013, 05:54PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Fatbob24 wrote:

Why? this site is based on opinion, hardly ever fact. Push off.

Because he started off by saying "here's a few fun FACTS", his words not mine. How about you read the whole thing before talking trash and then F$%k off?

Avatar
#88 Fresh Mess
December 30 2013, 06:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
Arius Mumin wrote:

Most oppositions 4th lines are way better than Oilers 3rd line, and sometimes even the 2nd.

When you are playing on the worst line on the worst NHL team: what exactly is a sheltered minute?

You must have been trolling when you typed this. Nonsensical.

Avatar
#89 Oiler Al
December 30 2013, 06:20PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

If this team knew what the f..k they were doing , they would do the right thing and send this kid down to OKC!. If he is going to develop, he needs ice time and plenty of it.Playing 6 min. a game with some bozos is not development.

Tell the Yak to put his ego aside, and invest some time in his hockey development, that is if he wants an NHL career.Other players went through that ordeal and turned into pretty good players. This is not a new idea.

Unless the Oilers made a deal with the devil { Larianov] and promised to keep him with the big club.

Avatar
#90 Arius Mumin
December 30 2013, 06:39PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
نفسه wrote:

إذا yakupov كان لها هذا الأداء نفسه تحت أي مدرب آخر في NHL تظن أنها سوف babying له، ونأمل أن يحصل على أفضل؟ أشك في ذلك.

لا أرى لماذا الناس ينقط خارجا على بعض الحب القاسي للyakupov. وقال انه لن يصبح لاعبا أفضل من خلال وجود من السهل مسيرته بأكملها.

وعلى الناس أن تكف عن الشكوى حول كيفية Gagner لا يحصل خدش. إيكنز يعرف رئيس عمال هو مشكوك في 2C هامشية ويعرف كيف موهوب وجيد yakupov هو ذلك عقد لهم نفس المستوى لا معنى له.

Insha'Allah

Avatar
#91 Fresh Mess
December 30 2013, 06:42PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
wintoon wrote:

I have no problem with Yakupov being benched if it is for long term development purposes. In the long run it should pay dividends. However, Gagner is a veteran centre. As a veteran and a centre he should be held even more accountable than a raw rookie. The problem is that I have seen him being gifted ice time rather than being held accountable. To me that is an injustice and is simply not fair to the team. Eakins needs to be perceived as fair or he will lose the room.

Your right, but you can blame MacLooselips for that rather than Eakins, it's coming from up top.

I can't stop laughing at the hilarity of the ON fangirls. They are now defending their new lover 'Yaky' with the same vigour they once had for Gagner and Hemsky. Yakupov is a terrible NHL player. Yes he has raw skill but he is a net liability.

And now the same shrill hystericals who were orgasmic in their excitement over Eakins' hiring have decided he is incarnate evil and responsible for the horrific play of Fail.

Dallas better be careful. If he thought the tongue lashing from comrade Igor was bad, wait 'til he experiences the wraith of comrade mummy and comrade daddy.

Avatar
#92 Stamsky Hemkos
December 30 2013, 06:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
28
cheers

Under Krueger, Yakupov was -4 in 48 games and had 31 pts. Under Eakins, he's -25 in 39 games and has 14 pts. Is there an Oiler from last year's roster that has improved under the Eakins' regime? They've all gone sideways or regressed. An exception would be RNH... but we all knew he would rebound.

Avatar
#93 Fresh Mess
December 30 2013, 06:51PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
40 Double D wrote:

Just play the kid. Ovechkin leads the league in goals and he's still -14.

How many cups has he won?

Avatar
#94 bulldog12
December 30 2013, 06:57PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers
Arius Mumin wrote:

Insha'Allah

This is Alberta Canada We speak English here.

Avatar
#95 Rod from Viking
December 30 2013, 07:32PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I don't know why everyone things Ganger has gotten special treatment, he was on the fourth line for a game and half and was told if he broke another stick over the crossbar after he left his man open again he would have to pay for 1/2 of a new stick.

In all seriousness I wonder if "Snowpants would have been left in the bottom six longer or had a reset if Arco would not of gotten hurt. It sure looks like no one who is paid over $4mil/year has a reset button.

Avatar
#96 ColourMeImpressed
December 30 2013, 07:45PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Puck Daddy chimes in on the issue...

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/fourth-liner-nail-yakupov-healthy-scratched-again-edmonton-213228110--nhl.html

Says the same thing we've been saying.

Avatar
#97 6 ring circus
December 30 2013, 07:58PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers

Maybe Eakins should watch a few games from the press box, maybe he would learn a thing or two, he sure hasn't learned much from standing behind the bench.

Avatar
#98 Wade
December 30 2013, 08:24PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Another Nail in the Yakupov.

Avatar
#99 Merle Eberle
December 30 2013, 08:24PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

If Management is going to stand pat while this egotistic coach ruins the kid's confidence, then they should've never drafted him in the first place.

Avatar
#100 nina russo
December 30 2013, 08:58PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers

Can anyone point me to a Fire Eakins web petition?

Thanks, N.

Comments are closed for this article.