TRADE WINDS....

Jason Gregor
March 27 2013 12:45PM

The 2013 NHL trade deadline is next Wednesday at 1 p.m. MST, and the next week will be great for those who love trade rumours. One rumour got squashed yesterday when it was reported that Mikka Kiprusoff would not report to his new team if the Calgary Flames traded him, which of course was met by laughter amongst Edmonton fans.

Thankfully there are many other rumblings, rumours and potential deals floating around.

What will the Oilers do?

Nikolai Khabibulin made Doug Maclean's suggestion that he could fetch a 2nd rounder seem realistic after his 43-save performance last night.

The tougher question is are the Oilers better off having Khabibulin as a $1.2 million back up next year, or moving him for a draft pick?

So let's look at some of the options the Oilers have to trade. These thoughts are a combination of my views as well as what I've heard and read as far as pros and cons for each player from pundits and fans. I don't agree or disagree with all of them, but respect the differing views.

KHABIBULIN

  • Would he want to play for $1.2 million?
  • He turns 41next January, and age catches up with most players.
  • Unreliable due to injuries.
  • His history of injuries is the main concern. The interesting thing about Khabibulin is that he works incredibly hard to stay in shape. He's in really good shape, but you wonder if his body is breaking down. Maybe he pushes too hard, because he seems to tweak something every few weeks.
  • When he plays he's played very well. In six starts he has a sparkling 1.93 GAA and a .941SV%. Those numbers are unattainable over a long period, but we've seen that when he plays he can still win games.
  • He works well with Dubnyk. They have a healthy and respectful relationship.
  • I don't see the Oilers being able to overhaul the blueline in one summer. It would require three solid moves, and while it is possible, I'm not sure it is realistic. If the Oilers don't land highly touted college prospect Danny Dekeyser (who is good, but far from a saviour or lock to be a top-four), and another D-man via a trade of UFA signing (weak pool) then their D won't be much better next year and they will need a reliable back up.

RYAN WHITNEY

  • The free agent list isn't very good, especially for D-men under the age of 30.
  • Justin Schultz would be the only excellent puck mover remaining. The Oilers need D-men who can move the puck quickly and accurately to their skilled forwards.
  • The Oilers recent history of signing UFAs to come into Edmonton isn't great. There is no guarantee they will find a better replacement. There is also a good chance Whitney performs well in another environment. Being comfortable and feeling confident is a huge factor in how a player performs on the ice.
  • The advanced stats show he's struggled.
  • He will never be able to turn due to his surgeries.
  • It is clear the coaching staff doesn't have a lot of confidence in him. When that happens, usually it is hard to change it. If a player is worried about making a mistake and getting benched, usually they make more mistakes.

RYAN JONES

  • For a team that struggles to score ES, at least he can score 5-on-5.
  • He goes to the net regularly and scores garbage goals. Oilers don't have a lot of guys like that.
  • Jones is a complimentary player. He won't be a key cog in winning, but he's shown the ability to produce. While surrendering scoring chances doesn't look good on paper, scoring goals trumps that.
  • He is on the ice for way too many scoring chances against.
  • Teemu Hartikainen is bigger and can replace him.
  • He isn't physical enough on a team that desperately needs some guys who are harder to play against. He's a solid NHLer, but if needed they can find a veteran UFA to replace him.

I suspect those three would make garner the most interest, amongst players the Oilers would consider trading.

There are some other names that have been tossed around for the Oilers...

Ladislav Smid

  • I think the Oilers would be foolish to deal him. I outlined the available free agent D-men yesterday, and no one on that list looks like a potential upgrade to Smid. Smid knows his role and he's good at it. He plays hard and is the most physical D-man who plays every night. I still believe the Oilers and Smid will come to an agreement prior to April 3rd. If they don't we can chat about then after the 3rd.

Ales Hemsky

  • If you trade him at the deadline you are likely only getting picks and prospects in return. At this point in the rebuild the Oilers need to move him in a deal where you get a proven NHL player back in return rather than picks. He's played much better now that his shoulder issues are behind him and I suspect there would be more interest in the summer.

Sam Gagner

  • Gagner has been the lightning rod for years in Edmonton. He's had a great start to the season and will get a raise on his current $3.2 million contract this summer. His trade value is much higher now than it was last year, so the return would be better. Gagner is very popular in the dressing room, he has worked hard at improving his game and no one questions his desire. I don't see any reason to move him at the deadline, and if he they consider moving him in the summer they have to get a solid D-man of big, skilled forward in return. I don't trade Gagner for anything less than a proven player.

LOOKING AHEAD

No one knows what the future holds, but at some point the results have to match the "potential"and "patience" that has been talked about for years in Edmonton.

For me there is one obvious conclusion coming for the Edmonton Oilers. They won't be able to move forward with all six of their young 19-23 year-old forwards. They don't have the right combination of size, skill and sandpaper needed to succeed in the NHL. That doesn't mean they all won't be successful NHL players, it just means I don't see all of them developing with the Oilers.

Taylor Hall and Jordan Eberle will make $6 million next year. Gagner is in line for a raise that will put him close to $5 million next year and Ryan Nugent-Hopkins likely gets a contract similar to Hall and Eberle starting in 2014.

The Oilers still haven't found a recipe to win, and when they do they won't be able to afford all of their young stars, even if you believe they can win with six skilled forwards.

The Oilers need to get some size down the middle, improve their blueline and get some productive veterans into their lineup. The issue is many think they can do this without trading any of their young skilled players. Reality check, that isn't going to be possible.

The way I see it the Oilers will end up moving two, maybe three players amongst Hemsky, Gagner, Magnus Paajarvi and Nail Yakupov. You might not like that reality, but I don't see any other way this team will be able to improve and afford their lineup if they don't make those types of moves.

There is a good chance that the Oilers trade those guys and they put up decent numbers on another team, and likely more than the players coming to Edmonton, but that doesn't mean the Oilers will lose those trades. If they acquire a strong, steady defenceman for one of them that makes them more competitive.

If they acquire a skilled forward who plays physical, scores, is a good puck retriever and goes to the net that will make them better. The Oilers will still have three very good skilled players remaining, in Hall, RNH and Eberle and one or two of 64, 89, 91 and 83.

You can't expect the Oilers to have six forwards score 55+ points regularly. It just doesn't happen in today's game. You need a good mix in your lineup. You need some some skilled players with size and grit. Suggesting you don't doesn't jive with teams that win championships.

Here are the top scorers, with at least 34 points, of the last four Cup winners: 

LOS ANGELES          
Player  Pos  GP  G  A  P
Anze Kopitar C 82 25 51 76
Justin Williams R 82 22 37 59
Dustin Brown R 82 22 32 54
Mike Richards C 74 18 26 44
Drew Doughty D 77 10 26 36
Jeff Carter L 55 21 13 34
           
BOSTON          
Player  Pos GP  G  A  P
Milan Lucic L 79 30 32 62
David Krejci C 75 13 49 62
Patrice Bergeron C 80 22 35 57
Nathan Horton R 80 26 27 53
Mark Recchi R 81 14 34 48
Tomas Kaberle D 82 4 43 47
Zdeno Chara D 81 14 30 44
Brad Marchand L 77 21 20 41
Rich Peverley C 82 18 23 41
Michael Ryder R 79 18 23 41
           
CHICAGO Pos GP  G  A  P
Patrick Kane R 82 30 58 88
Duncan Keith D 82 14 55 69
Jonathan Toews C 76 25 43 68
Patrick Sharp L 82 25 41 66
Marian Hossa R 57 24 27 51
Kris Versteeg R 79 20 24 44
Troy Brouwer R 78 22 18 40
Andrew Ladd L 82 17 21 38
Brian Campbell D 68 7 31 38
           
PITTSBURGH          
Evgeni Malkin C 82 35 78 113
Sidney Crosby C 77 33 70 103
Chris Kunitz L 82 23 30 53
Jordan Staal C 82 22 27 49
Bill Guerin R 78 21 27 48
Petr Sykora R 76 25 21 46
Ruslan Fedotenko L 65 16 23 39
Miroslav Satan R 65 17 19 36
Tyler Kennedy C 67 15 20 35

Do you honestly believe the Oilers top-six resembles any of those teams?

The reality is the Oilers will need to move some of their skilled forwards.

The difficult question will be when and who?

THINKING OUTLOUD...

Yesterday on my radio show, I asked Jason Strudwick if he'd deal Nail Yakupov for David Clarkson. Of course the deal would hinge on Clarkson having a new contract and the Oilers getting something else in return. It wasn't a one-for-one deal.

The point of the question was to point out  that the Oilers will need to trade away a skilled player; one who likely will produce points elsewhere. (Yakupov was just an example. Not saying he is the 1st one I'd trade) And by trading one or two of them away, that doesn't mean they are bad players. It just means the Oilers need to alter their lineup to become more successful.

The difficult decision for the Oilers GM, whoever that is when the time comes to trade one of them, is making the right move. The move won't be made solely on statistics. They will have to look at other things: contracts, attitude, competitive nature, size, etc.

It won't be easy, but it you believe it won't happen I think you are fooling yourself.

The reactions to the Clarkson topic ranged from "You're an idiot," to "Yakupov could be like Stamkos."

Both made me chuckle, but the latter really stuck with me. Stamkos is the best goal scorer in the game, so of course it is realistic to compare Yakupov to him because they were both #1 picks and because Yakupov has a good one-timer. I hope for Yakupov's sake he becomes like Stamkos, but Stamkos has more to his game than a great one-timer. Stamkos has incredibly high hockey sense, and he's excellent at anticipating where the openings are in the offensive zone to get himself in good scoring areas.

Yakupov might become a very good scorer, but suggesting he'll be like Stamkos is the ultimate best-case scenario. It is unlikely, however. Just like it is unlikely that the first overall picks taken between Stamkos and Yakupov, John Tavares, Hall and RNH, will score as often as Stamkos.

Many people want the Oilers to acquire good players, but they aren't willing to give up anything of substance. Instead they want to offer up spare parts, usually players you feel are junk, to get players like Clarkson, Lucic, Clowe or others.  

If the Oilers are going to improve moving forward they will eventually need to change the mix amongst their top forwards. It will be a difficult decision, and the organization has to ensure they have the right guy calling the shots. Based on recent decisions, it is fair to question whether the current regime is prepared and able to make the right choice.

This type of trade will occur in the near future, and when it does, the Oilers must make the correct decision and they need the right man calling the shots.

RECENTLY BY JASON GREGOR

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#101 rickithebear
March 27 2013, 03:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

David Clarkson Had 8PPG and 8 PP assists last year. this year he is on pace for 12PPGin a 80 GM season. he is a career 10% goal scorer. his 30G season he was 35% over his caeer average for shooting %.

Give him 2nd PP unit time he gets u 3-4PPG a year. that makes him a 17-18G/year guy.

Clarkson GF/60 rate on PP the last three years. 2.17 12-13 1.51 11-12 0.45 10-11

Our PP: 12-13 Hemsky 3.86 Horcoff 2.81 Yakupov 2.33 Gagner 2.14 MP 2.13 Eberle 1.93 hartikainen 1.59 Hall 1.33

11-12 Hall 3.64 Jones 2.70 Eberle 2.65 Gagner 1.66 Horcoff 1.33

10-11 Horcoff 2.50 Hall 2.18 Hartikainen 2.11 Jones 1.81 Eberle 1.43 there is no way he plays on our first 2 PP units.

Sometimes people are on the first PP unit for teams cause there are no other options.

What I see is you wanting to trade for a guy that will get to play in the exact same role as Ryan jones and likely get the same production.

Ryan jones was top 10 in Pk winger the last two seasons. Something Clarkson does not do.

trading for a guy who cannot PK. Had 30 goal season by having a career shooting % year and being proped up by playing 3 min of PP a game.

when we have a player with simmiliar even scoring rates with no PP time even though he scores more per minute of pp time.

Plus the guy you want to bring in does not PK.

this is awfull on so many levels - less Pk options - Higher Cap hit. - loss of assets.

If lou is smart he trades for Jones. Dumps Clarkson. Gets a better fit for his team @ probably 1/3 the cap hit.

Avatar
#102 Quicksilver ballet
March 27 2013, 03:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Oilfred wrote:

I think most of us know what the answer would be if you where to ask NHL GMs what they think about Yakupov for Clarkson.

The Stamkos comparison goes way beyond a one timer. They played on the same junior team and Yak broke Stamkos' scoring record.

I know you feeling defensive but I have to say this come across as having as much grown up responsibility for ones actions as a 5 year old.

Weak dude.

Weak.

Go easy on him, deep down inside he's just a hockeyfan like the rest of us. No harm no foul.

Every trade ever made in the NHL was laughed at from one side or the other before it actually happened. How many times have we seen an NHL trade happen and thought to ourselves, wow, that was alot to give up. Who knows why trades go down the way they do, money reasons, conflicts between players/management yada yada. From the outside deals like this happen all the time.

Avatar
#103 John Chambers
March 27 2013, 03:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@bored

"I personnally believe we have enough assets to field a playoff team next year, however, I don't think we have the right mix of players."

Bingo.

But Yakupov for someone with far less skill in their late 20's is a fireable offense.

Surely we can obtain a quality young asset on D (Carlson, Del Zotto, Fowler, Gudbrandson, Faulk, etc) as well as a quality YOUNG forward in exchange for Eberle or Yakupov.

But Tambellini isn't much of a salesman.

Avatar
#104 justDOit
March 27 2013, 03:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Quicksilver ballet

Can you remember what the Oilers got back in return for Satan? I can't.

Avatar
#105 TigerUnderGlass
March 27 2013, 03:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

So to be clear - you want us to compare the Oilers top six to the top six in Chicago, but you want to include CHI players who were not in the top six?

Ladd? Brouwer? Not in the top six.

Lets look at the top six based on how they were used instead.

Kane, Toews, Bolland, Versteeg, Hossa, Byfuglien.

I grant that Byfuglien was large and physical. Hossa and Toews are tallish but hardly "gritty". Bolland is one inch taller and 10 pounds lighter than Gagner. Versteeg and Kane are tiny.

Does this mean you would trade a future star like Yakupov for a guy like RW Byfuglien circa 2010 to have a top six that "looks like theirs"?

Why wouldn't you look for grit the way everyone else does? Nobody trades star players for grit, that's how you lose your job. It's crazy.

Avatar
#106 Bucknuck
March 27 2013, 03:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
justDOit wrote:

Can you remember what the Oilers got back in return for Satan? I can't.

A guy named Miller if I remember correctly. Supposed to be a puck moving defensive prospect. I can't remember if he ever played an NHL game.

Avatar
#107 vetinari
March 27 2013, 03:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I'd love to see our GM actually add pieces through UFA's because in those situations, we don't give up players from a position of weakness to fill holes-- those trades tend to be to augment rosters not compensate for what's clearly missing in the lineup.

Of course, our brain trust collectively decided a couple years ago that we needed grit and faceoff ability (which was true) and they added Eager, Hordichuk and Belanger as a result. The results have been 2 out of 3 sent to the minors after clearing waivers, and the third being a frequent flyer on the injury reserved list.

I suspect that we will be deadline sellers even if we are a few points out because this roster, as it currently stands, would get killed in the playoffs because that's when teams get really disciplined and tight, and we can't yet compete on that level on a consistent basis, and guys like Khabibulin and Jones will have no value to us past April 3rd.

I think that Yak and Paajarvi are the most disposable/tradable of the recent first rounders, but they may be more tradable in June when teams have to roll back under the new cap for 2013-14 and teams may be willing to dump quality but pricey veterans for youth.

Frankly, I expect a modest to quiet trade deadline for OilerNation but a busy draft day through to the UFA season.

Avatar
#108 Zack
March 27 2013, 03:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Jason, your a smart hockey brain and I've been reading your articles for years; but you seem desperate now to win some hockey games. I understand the regular season and the playoffs are a whole different animal. Big teams wear down the opposition. But your patience is needed a little bit longer. Let's say 5 years from now if yakupov turns into a 40 goal scorer and we are a playoff contender. Wouldn't we be looking at him as a rental at the trade deadline if we traded him today ?

Avatar
#109 Zack
March 27 2013, 03:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Hemsky for clarkson seem fair. But you don't trade 1st overall picks in today's NHL. And if you do it's a blockbuster trade where we benefit greatly not just a quick upgrade.

Avatar
#110 Butters
March 27 2013, 04:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

"Do you honestly believe the Oilers top-six resembles any of those teams?"

While the Oiler forwards may not resemble the flavour of the year SC Champion LA Kings', I think Jonathon Quick's 940 Save % and 1.36 GAA going into Game 6 played a big part.

Avatar
#111 DieHard
March 27 2013, 04:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I agree, something has to be done. Probably Hemsky and Gagner and another high end prospect BUT not for about 2 more years. I believe we need to keep YAK though.

Avatar
#112 Matt Henderson
March 27 2013, 04:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

RNH, Eberle, Yak, Hall, and Schultz are Untouchable. Absolutely untouchable.

The fact is the Oilers only know how much the Cap is going to be next year. After that it is a mystery. The Cap rose every single year in the last CBA, it will likely continue to do so.

The Oilers are not in a Cap bind with their young players. If they arent int a crunch then they have the luxury of waiting for Yak and RNH to emerge.

Trading Yakupov today would be a terrible mistake. What if Stamkos was traded while Barry Melrose was the Coach and he was struggling?

Avatar
#114 HockeyBoss
March 27 2013, 04:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Jason Gregor

Fair enough.

We agree that "in the near future" somethings gotta give..The Oil have an "embarrassment of riches" at FWD as they say..One can make the arguement that it takes talent to get talent..So i get your point..But disagree that we'll need to move one of the core kids to get tougher....

This is where I think a new GM - someone who can work multiple deals, has the nuts to pull a trade needs to come in...

Move future draft picks...Add a decent roster player (such as a Hemsky)and you get the tough fwd (or Dman) the fill any other void the oilers have.

Make moves now so you don't have to move the core in the future.

Avatar
#116 bazmagoo
March 27 2013, 04:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Trading Yakupov would be a major error in judgement. The kids got a great attitude and has the potential to be a consistent top 25 scorer in the league (or higher).

The only top 6 type forward we should be looking at trading is Hemsky, but it would also have to be a hockey trade. No more trades for picks, we need veterans who can perform on a consistent basis.

Oilersnation continues to be in panic mode, but to be honest I can't understand why. Anyone who watched the first 10 games of the season should have known there was zero chance this team would make the playoffs (still hoping they prove me wrong) but the arrows are all pointing in the right direction. Just need a little more stability on d, more size upfront (note Hall, Eberle, Gagner, Yakupov, and RNH will all get bigger/stronger over the next 5 years as well as they grow into their bodies) and a little more consistent goaltending.

Slowly but surely we are becoming more and more competitive, it isn't likely to happen over night

Avatar
#117 Matt Henderson
March 27 2013, 04:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@Jason Gregor

Jason, dont you think that's a problem for 5 years from now? It's way too premature to be worried about paying a kid who just began his ELC.

Avatar
#118 Newj
March 27 2013, 04:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@Matt Henderson

You said it Indiana...RNH, Eberle, Yak, Hall, and Schultz are Untouchable. Absolutely untouchable.

After that its up for discussion.

But its too early to trade any of the 5 youngsters until we know what they can or cant do.

Avatar
#119 Ducey
March 27 2013, 04:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Jason Gregor

The Oilers are not built, and won't be in four years, to win with all kids. Age, size, maturity, style of play are the reasons. You don't have to like it, but if you don't see the differences between the Oilers and the makeup of the championship teams then you are watching more with your heart.

Uh, in 4 years the kids won't be kids anymore...and they will be more mature...and better defensively, and uh, what are you talking about?

Oh right, it really boils down to the "too small" argument again.

Avatar
#120 Zack
March 27 2013, 04:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Oil Kings 'n' Pretty Things

Looks like Kadri is their leading scorer He acquired him through draft .....

Avatar
#121 The Oilers Shot Clock
March 27 2013, 04:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

Show me where I said compare the Oilers to the Hawks. Actually I included players who had 35 points to show it is rare for teams to even have 4 guys score 50.

Bolland is an excellent two-way player. Size has nothing to do with it. Suggesting Gagner plays like Bolland is completely inaccurate. The Oilers mix isn't just size. It is a lack of defensive awareness.

Hossa is a heavy player. Ask NHL D-men he's incredibly hard to play against. He also was 30 and a veteran. And you didn't include Patrick Sharp in their top-six? He had 66 points playing on the 3rd line? Wow that is the best 3rd liner in recent history.

And Sharp and Hossa were veterans, and the rest were all mid 20s...except Toews and Kane.

The Oilers are all kids and is a major factor. They don't have the gamesmanship or experience needed to win.

The Oilers are not built, and won't be in four years, to win with all kids. Age, size, maturity, style of play are the reasons. You don't have to like it, but if you don't see the differences between the Oilers and the makeup of the championship teams then you are watching more with your heart.

Then you can add in the salary cap factor and how the ELC deals will all be done in two years. Another major hurdle.

100% Theres nothing wrong with trading a good player for another good player if it fills a need. Im as attached to these kids as the next guy but at least one will have to move and I dont understand how thats a bad thing. Our bottom 6 is a disaster and our options on defense are too limited. Trading a kid to sort some of this is both wise in the short term and years down the road.

Avatar
#122 BigE91
March 27 2013, 04:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

What's needed in the top 6 is someone in the mold of Bill Guerin. Hard nosed, heavy game with 30 goal potential. Maybe I missing them but I just don't see many of that type of player around the league right now.

Maybe Ryan O'Reilly but he's not moving for a year now.

Avatar
#123 BRHLBryce
March 27 2013, 04:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

If any of the big 5 (Hall-Ebs-Nuge-Yak-Schultz) has to be traded, you would want to trade the least dynamic of the group. Looking 2-3 years down the road when the contracts are the concern, it HAS to be Eberle that is moved.

I love Ebs, but lets face it, the upside of everyone else on that list surpasses Eberle, and will be more valuable to us in the longterm. Add in his sp% regression to the norm, and Eberle is probably overpaid on his extension.

If Ebs is traded to get us that top pairing dman, or big bodied top 6 forward, it would make sense.

That being said, with tambo at the help, I am sure we deal Whitney and Jones for picks, and stand pat, yet again.

Avatar
#124 Bucknuck
March 27 2013, 04:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

If I was trading one of the kids, then I would be looking at a player like Evander Kane in return.

That I could handle.

Avatar
#125 washed up
March 27 2013, 05:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

The olny player's I would't listen to offers for are, Hall, RNH, and Schultz. Everyone else is fair play.

Avatar
#126 hunkybill
March 27 2013, 05:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

RNH production is down. How about trade him for Joe Thornton and first rounder.

Avatar
#127 washed up
March 27 2013, 05:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

If you can get a deal for Eberle like the Blues got for Johnson. You make that deal all day long.

Avatar
#128 WinterNightSky
March 27 2013, 05:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
justDOit wrote:

Can you remember what the Oilers got back in return for Satan? I can't.

Craig Millar and Len Barrie. That was super awesome.

Avatar
#129 Shredder
March 27 2013, 05:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

So Gregor, feeling a bit defensive for the Clarkson trade suggestion are we? I don't know that we needed a whole other blog to go over this point.

So you want to switch up the skill players for grit and/or defense. I can do that. Clarkson for Yakupov in no way makes sense. What you add to that, go ahead and suggest it. I see Yakupov, as the #1 overall pick, and proving to be worth that pick, being as equal value as one of the top young defensemen in the game. Yes there's a risk he doesn't pan out, but there's also a lot more time on his RFA status that pretty much everyone in the league. That's going to be worth more than you think when the new cap kicks in.

IMO Eberle, Hall, Nuge, Yakupov are the most important pieces of this rebuild. Ideally we can keep Gagner and MPS as well. Schultz(19) is probably a very important player to build a blue line, and we'll need to keep guys like Smid for this team to really work.

I guess the point I'm making is that if you do sell a young guy, who is a big part of the core of the team, you better be able to fill all the holes on the team, not just one. Thornton got 3 role players for one skill player. And still the Bruins looked stupid for that trade. And you'd give up Yak for less? That's where I had an issue.

Avatar
#130 The Soup Fascist
March 27 2013, 05:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
WinterNightSky wrote:

Craig Millar and Len Barrie. That was super awesome.

You had the "Barrie" part right but it was Barrie Moore not Len Barrie. Len Barrie may have actually played a season or two in the NHL - Barrie Moore - not so much.

But allegedly Mr. Moore was much better at paying casinos, taxes and business partners than Mr. Barrie ....... But that is another story.

Avatar
#131 BigE91
March 27 2013, 05:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
BRHLBryce wrote:

If any of the big 5 (Hall-Ebs-Nuge-Yak-Schultz) has to be traded, you would want to trade the least dynamic of the group. Looking 2-3 years down the road when the contracts are the concern, it HAS to be Eberle that is moved.

I love Ebs, but lets face it, the upside of everyone else on that list surpasses Eberle, and will be more valuable to us in the longterm. Add in his sp% regression to the norm, and Eberle is probably overpaid on his extension.

If Ebs is traded to get us that top pairing dman, or big bodied top 6 forward, it would make sense.

That being said, with tambo at the help, I am sure we deal Whitney and Jones for picks, and stand pat, yet again.

Come again? You're going to move the guy that has been compared to Joe Sakic in terms of skill set and hockey sense?

Personally, I can't say which one I'd move. To me Schultz will likely become the cornerstone if he lives up to his potential. Hall can be that power forward and I think the jury is out on RNH and Yakupov. Though if RNH's offense catches up with his defensive game he will be hard to move.

Right now Yakupov is the wild card. He hasn't played himself into a top 6 role YET but he may soon and that will make the decision making process much tougher for the Oilers middling upper management.

Avatar
#132 BRHLBryce
March 27 2013, 05:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

take a shot at Tyler Myers at 5.5 million? You could get him relatively cheap from Buffalo (as in PRV gets a quick yes), he has 8 years at 5.5 left, which is brutal if he plays like he has this year. But if he rebounds, and plays like he did the first 3 years? There's your top pairing young, monster dman.

If he doesn't is management willing to use a compliance buyout on him down the road?

Unfortunately, that outside the box thinking is not prevalent. I guess we wait till Tambo gets fired and see what MacT does

FTNF

Avatar
#133 T__Bone88
March 27 2013, 05:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Maybe a possible Yakupov for James Neal in the summer might work out as a trade? I believe some report was saying that Pittsburgh is loading up for this year because in the next few years might run into cap issues especially with Malkin and Letang coming up for resigning in 2014. So basically it would allow Pittsburgh to free up some cap room and still have a potential 40 goal/80 point player in Yakupov that would look good with Crosby/Malkin. Oilers would get a bigger player in Neal.

Avatar
#134 BRHLBryce
March 27 2013, 05:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

How does who he's been compared to (rightly or wrongly) have any effect on what his longterm ability is?

Again, I like Eberle, but of the big 5? He's the most expendable, since he doesn't have nearly the ceiling that the others do. His skating will never be great, he isn't big, and has no physical game at all.

As far as Sakic, as someone living in Denver, if anyone is Sakic like, it's the Nuge.

Avatar
#135 washed up
March 27 2013, 05:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
T__Bone88 wrote:

Maybe a possible Yakupov for James Neal in the summer might work out as a trade? I believe some report was saying that Pittsburgh is loading up for this year because in the next few years might run into cap issues especially with Malkin and Letang coming up for resigning in 2014. So basically it would allow Pittsburgh to free up some cap room and still have a potential 40 goal/80 point player in Yakupov that would look good with Crosby/Malkin. Oilers would get a bigger player in Neal.

I Agree. That's one of the big adavatages that Yakapov has. He's cheap. For the next few years anyway. That's a big asset when talking trades in this cap era.

Avatar
#136 Crispy
March 27 2013, 05:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

Zack,

In five years you think the Oilers will be able to afford 4,14,93,89,64, 91, Schultz and this year's top pick?

And that they will win with all skilled forwards, with not much size?

How do you see the Oilers getting bigger in their top-six and wearing down teams, if you don't move any of the current players. I don't see them suddenly growing and getting bigger.

And I never said the deal happens today, but they will happen in the next two years.

I think we could afford all of those players. Paarvi should be relatively cheap. Right now we're paying Horcoff, Hemsky, Whitney, and Khabibulin 18.25 million. In 5 years those contracts will be gone. That money should be enough to sign 93, 64, and 19, and we will have to give Gagner about a 2 mil raise if he keeps playing like this. As far as size / grit, if we continue to suck this year we may have a shot at drafting Monahen, and hopefully Hartikainen will improve. Also 5 years is a long time, the cap will likely be higher than it is now in 2018.

Avatar
#137 Ducey
March 27 2013, 05:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
BRHLBryce wrote:

take a shot at Tyler Myers at 5.5 million? You could get him relatively cheap from Buffalo (as in PRV gets a quick yes), he has 8 years at 5.5 left, which is brutal if he plays like he has this year. But if he rebounds, and plays like he did the first 3 years? There's your top pairing young, monster dman.

If he doesn't is management willing to use a compliance buyout on him down the road?

Unfortunately, that outside the box thinking is not prevalent. I guess we wait till Tambo gets fired and see what MacT does

FTNF

Thats a big risk. Myers numbers have been going down steadily. He might rebound but you have to figure his confidence may be shot - maybe for good.

I'd take a flyer on him but I would not want to give MPS for him, especially with that contract. He could be an anchor, even with a buyout.

MPS is going to be a stud two way forward in a few years. Just what the Oilers need. He likely will average around 35 - 40 pts, so he shouldn't get too expensive.

I might be inclined to give up Hemsky for him if they take Eager's contract or throw in a pick.

Avatar
#138 justDOit
March 27 2013, 05:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
WinterNightSky wrote:

Craig Millar and Len Barrie. That was super awesome.

Thx. My point was that if the return on that trade didn't suck the big one, we would remember who came back.

Avatar
#139 Ducey
March 27 2013, 05:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
BRHLBryce wrote:

How does who he's been compared to (rightly or wrongly) have any effect on what his longterm ability is?

Again, I like Eberle, but of the big 5? He's the most expendable, since he doesn't have nearly the ceiling that the others do. His skating will never be great, he isn't big, and has no physical game at all.

As far as Sakic, as someone living in Denver, if anyone is Sakic like, it's the Nuge.

Eberle has already established a 76 point season.

He is a pure sniper.

Guys like him always get overlooked. See Luke Robitaille, Joey Mullen etc.

Avatar
#140 justDOit
March 27 2013, 05:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

LeBrun said today that he wouldn't be surprised to see J Jokinen moved soon, but either Carolina keeps some salary, or takes back a player on the deal. Eager for JJ sounds about right then, if the Oilers can take his $3M salary next season - I don't claim to have enough time to delve into any team's cap management strategies.

Avatar
#141 seanjohn
March 27 2013, 06:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@TigerUnderGlass

Yak for the Buf? in a f--king heartbeat. are you kidding me? you guys have to get over your fascination with what you percieve as 'skill'. you do not need or want 6 or 7 danglers on one team. 4 is about right. Hall/RNH/Ebs + one more is enough. trade the other danglers for different types of skill. I'd trade Yak for Lucic just as fast. too many people look at the player and think 'he could be a 40 goal scorer' without considering team needs and surpluses. Yak could probably net 2 or 3 very needed players.

Avatar
#142 Chet134
March 27 2013, 06:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I have the same mind set of management. Raise tickets prices and concessions up 5 to 10 per cent, put two or three more new rookies in the squad, resign smitty and horkoff to 5 year contracts, resign smid whitney fistric and gagner and don't bring in any other players. Hold on crickets crickets from managements office. We can keep bashing other organizations on how poorly they run there team but WE ARE THE JOKE OF LEAGUE. Great supportive fans but the worst run club. Down with the evil empire.

Avatar
#143 Oilerfan4ever
March 27 2013, 06:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

JG, I couldn't agree more with your article. The truth is the Oilers have a great nucleus to build from but they are missing that size,toughness and grit that will make them a playoff and potential stanley cup contender in years to come!

I just don't think under the current regime of ST,KL and Co. that they have the ability to make such moves..........I don't know how as fans we can see there are pieces missing and they working from the inside cannot make the connection.

As always the frustration builds. Serenity now, serenity now!!

Avatar
#144 DSF
March 27 2013, 06:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Here we go.

Iginla a healthy scratch tonight.

Avatar
#145 GVBlackhawk
March 27 2013, 06:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

How does Yakupov project to be a better player?

More consistent effort than Eberle? Please elaborate on that comment.

I am shocked that you have to ask that question.

Yakupov projects to be a better player because he was putting up the same numbers at age 17 that Eberle was doing at age 20. Their age by age comps all favor Yakupov -- and it isn't even close.

Yakupov's skill set is at a higher level than Eberle's (if not everyone on the Oilers). Better shot, better skater, better passer, better vision. There is a reason why he was coveted as the 1st overall pick.

Eberle stepped into the NHL in his 21 year old season and did well on a sheltered line with cherry minutes. In his 22 year old season, he played lights out on a sheltered line with cherry minutes and an incredibly high shooting percentage. He is regressing now that he has to face tougher competition.

Yakupov is playing NHL in his 19 year old season, not playing sheltered minutes and doesn't receive the power play time that Eberle did in his rookie year.

Regarding the 'consistency of effort' comment, that is difficult to quantify, which is why I said 'by eye'. From what I have observed, Yakupov will engage the body at any time. Eberle rarely engages physically. Yakupov is also more inclined to backcheck and make a defensive play (versus Eberle in his rookie season).

Yakupov is the better player. Ignoring this is just blatant western Canadian homerism (and I was born and raised in Saskatchewan).

Avatar
#146 Racki
March 27 2013, 06:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Can we convince some teams that Ryan Whitney's been scratched for several games this year because we were protecting an asset? ......... =|:)

Avatar
#147 GVBlackhawk
March 27 2013, 07:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Sanaa Montana wrote:

How old do you think you average reader is? 10? 11?

First and foremost, you're trade proposal is ridiculous. Even more ridiculous is the fact that you just won't admit that is is a stupid idea to begin with.

If I was to consider your reasoning as truth, I would conclude that you never had a point to begin with. I can understand how some people would miss the point, and have you accuse them of that: it is very easy to do when no point exist in the first place.

You say that Oilers will need to get one of their young guns, I agree. Then, you don't include Gagner in your list(obvious choice) and go on to call him a lightning rod. Laughable.

If you were trying to make the point and come up with a scenario; why did you only come up with that asinine one? Why only consider Yakupov? Why not something more reasonable, like Gagner? Or for someone who might actually be available instead of Clarkson?

Jones good at 5v5. Again, laughable. He has one goal all in 14 games. Whattathreat.!.. The only thing softer than Jones on the ice during the game is Smyth's shots. Jones was a flash in the pan, at best.

No doubt. Ryan Jones is awful 5v5. The only thing he is good at is falling down.

Have a look at the Blues game from yesterday. Jones has the ultimate 'Jones' shift in the second period where he falls down three times. The third time, at 5:27 of the second period, he falls wildly and looks like Bambi doing it. Then he gets up, skates to the bench, and gets ROCKED. It's comical to watch him.

He skates around and does nothing, but because he is trying so hard, some people think he is good/effective.

Avatar
#148 leadfarmer
March 27 2013, 07:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

Zack,

In five years you think the Oilers will be able to afford 4,14,93,89,64, 91, Schultz and this year's top pick?

And that they will win with all skilled forwards, with not much size?

How do you see the Oilers getting bigger in their top-six and wearing down teams, if you don't move any of the current players. I don't see them suddenly growing and getting bigger.

And I never said the deal happens today, but they will happen in the next two years.

They'll have to move one or 2 but I sure hope the return is better than Clarkson.

Avatar
#149 Wax Man Riley
March 27 2013, 07:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
GVBlackhawk wrote:

I am shocked that you have to ask that question.

Yakupov projects to be a better player because he was putting up the same numbers at age 17 that Eberle was doing at age 20. Their age by age comps all favor Yakupov -- and it isn't even close.

Yakupov's skill set is at a higher level than Eberle's (if not everyone on the Oilers). Better shot, better skater, better passer, better vision. There is a reason why he was coveted as the 1st overall pick.

Eberle stepped into the NHL in his 21 year old season and did well on a sheltered line with cherry minutes. In his 22 year old season, he played lights out on a sheltered line with cherry minutes and an incredibly high shooting percentage. He is regressing now that he has to face tougher competition.

Yakupov is playing NHL in his 19 year old season, not playing sheltered minutes and doesn't receive the power play time that Eberle did in his rookie year.

Regarding the 'consistency of effort' comment, that is difficult to quantify, which is why I said 'by eye'. From what I have observed, Yakupov will engage the body at any time. Eberle rarely engages physically. Yakupov is also more inclined to backcheck and make a defensive play (versus Eberle in his rookie season).

Yakupov is the better player. Ignoring this is just blatant western Canadian homerism (and I was born and raised in Saskatchewan).

Is the question "Who is the better player?" or "Who projects to be better throughout their career?"

If it is "Who is the better player?", then an additional question is "Who would you rather have on the ice with 1min to go?"

Eberle..... all day long. Eberle is the better player today.

Avatar
#150 Clyde Frog
March 27 2013, 07:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

So, if Calgary has a firesale; who is interested in Glencross?

Seems like he would be an excellent (Hopefully cheapish) addition to a top 6..

Comments are closed for this article.