GDB 42.0: PLAYING FOR PRIDE

Jason Gregor
April 16 2013 12:23PM

The Oilers won't reach their goal of making the playoffs. For them it sucks. They want to win, and missing the playoffs for the 7th consecutive season must feel like a swift kick to the junk. However, the Oilers need to suck it up and compete in their final seven games.

If they don't, then new genernal manager Craig MacTavish will have a much more difficult job trying to re-shape his team. If the Oilers don't have enough competitive players, it doesn't matter how much skill, speed or size they assemble. You can't win if you aren't willing to match the intensity, desperation and desire of the opposition.

"We basically lost to the &*(&*(#@$% Abbotsford Heat last game...We didn't just lose, we got our ass kicked," an Oiler player told me yesterday. He was embarrassed by his team's performance and said the next seven games guys have to show each other they care. He said it off the record, so I can't attribute it to him, but he was fuming which surprised me since I've never seen him that amped up.

We'll see if his teammates feel the same as him when they face the Minnesota Wild.

The Wild are in 6th place, one point up on St. Louis and two up on Detroit and Columbus. A month ago they looked like a lock to make the playoffs, but they are 3-6-1 in their last 10. They aren't playing very well down the stretch and the young Oilers have an opportunity to share their non-playoff disappointment with another Northwest division foe.

LINEUP

The Oilers recalled Teemu Hartikainen and Anton Lander yesterday and both will be in the lineup tonight. I'd have thrown Hartikainen beside RNH and Eberle and put Hall with Gagner and Yakupov, because the top line hasn't scored a goal in five games, so switch it up.

Kreuger will switch up his lines:

Hall/Gagner/Yakupov
Paajarvi/RNH/Eberle
Hartikainen/Lander/Horcoff
Brown/Smyth/Petrell

Smid/Petry
N.Schultz/J.Schultz
Fistric/Potter

Dubnyk

At this point you might as well look at many different combos. It is odd seeing Horcoff on the wing and Smyth at centre, but for one game why not. It shouldnt' matter what positions the players play, all 18 skaters must simply play hard and smart.  

QUICK HITS

  • Craig MacTavish will be much more decisive and proactive than Steve Tambellini. I'm not sure if he'll be Paul Holmgren-ish, but he's not going to hesitate to makes some moves. That could be good and bad of course, but Oilers fans will have lots to discuss this off-season. I suspect you will see at least 7 new regulars on the roster next year.
     
  • I'm not surprised MacTavish said he'd make bold moves. I wrote this on March 27th, yet many claimed I was clueless. A bold move doesn't mean shipping out 4th liners, it means moving out a good player and getting a good one in return. It won't be a surprise when MacTavish pulls off a deal, but it will be intriguing to see how many deals he makes.
     
  • If I had to rank the most pressing needs of the Oilers, i'd go with these. 1. A strong veteran shut down D-man who can play 20 minutes. 2. Another puck moving defenceman. 3. One, and ideally two, top-six forwards with strength and size. 4. A third line veteran forward who is physical, can kill penalties and play tough minutes. None of those are easy to find, but that is what this team needs. If Oscar Klefbom makes the team next year, he has to start the season in the third pairing. They can't rely on him to be a top-four. If he plays his way up the ranks, great, but he shouldn't be expected to start there.
     
  • The great part about sports is that we will all interpret comments/quotes differently. Kevin Lowe's comments yesterday regarding "two-types of fans" had many fans irate. He never said he cares or listens to season ticket holders more, he said they communicate with them more, which is true. Ideally, he never should have said "two-different type of fans," because automatically those who aren't season seat holders will feel offended.  You can say he chose the wrong words, but Lowe interacts with fans more than his players, so any suggestion that he doesn't care about fans would be misleading. I actually thought his comment about six Stanley Cup rings would rile people up more than his fan comment. Either way, It made for some excellent debates.
     
  • The Wild are in a battle for the final three playoff spots. They can't afford to take the Oilers lightly, and I suspect they won't. The Wild didn't skate this morning, but Mikko Koivu made it clear that they expect the Oilers to be hungry and ready to show their new GM they are worthy of being part of the team moving forward. It was an interesting take from an opposing player, and I'm curious to see if he is right.

TONIGHT....

GAME DAY PREDICTION: The Wild played last night, so the Oilers should have more energy and a heightened urge to impress their new GM. Oilers squeek out a 2-1 win.

OBVIOUS GAME DAY PREDICTION: Someone will try and make the Clutterbuck/Hall hit a story line. Clutterbuck has only fought twice in the last three seasons, but someone will go with the redemption angle. Clutterbuck loves to hit, and if he takes a few healthy runs at the Oilers none of us should be surprised.

NOT-SO-OBVIOUS GAME DAY PREDICTION: Lander has played 60 NHL games thus far, but he's played 13+ minutes only 9 times. He will play 14 minutes tonight, and he will end his 19-game (dating back to last year) goal-scoring drought in the 2nd period.

RECENTLY BY JASON GREGOR

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#151 NewAgeSys
April 16 2013, 10:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Darn it I slept through the better part of this game but it doesnt look so bad now. Wonder why we werent doing this sooner?

i must say that the men work their butts off for Ralph when he pulls the tender so early, they must appreciate the opportunity, but they sure surprise me how few times we are scored against when we do this early pull move, I hope it never backfires in the playoffs.

Lets look on the bright side but this was essentially a 5-4 game with the last second miss there.

What the hell happened in the first part of this game . Because the game i saw in the 3rd wasnt the same team that must have shown up in the 1st. We were taking the entire game over in the 3rd period. MMMmmm.... thats odd isnt it, what happened to make us change so drasticlly in that time frame? Did guys just try hrder suddenly or did we make adjustments that worked?? Lets figure it out and try to do it for 60 mins next time. Nice dynamic finish, but where was the start?

Nice to see Yakupov getting some points, keep feeding him the puck boys, elevate him if we can . Nice bounceback tonight, nice effort under less than optimal circumstances. I am glad we left Dubby where he was, maturation comes in many forms

It would have probably been good to see the level of micro-managment we saw in the 3rd much earlier but I wasnt watching this one early so I dont know what the problems were. I do know I would hve liked to have seen another two periods because we seemed to have dialed them in there for most of the thrird period. We were coming on without a doubt.

Avatar
#152 clyde
April 16 2013, 10:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
NewAgeSys wrote:

Darn it I slept through the better part of this game but it doesnt look so bad now. Wonder why we werent doing this sooner?

i must say that the men work their butts off for Ralph when he pulls the tender so early, they must appreciate the opportunity, but they sure surprise me how few times we are scored against when we do this early pull move, I hope it never backfires in the playoffs.

Lets look on the bright side but this was essentially a 5-4 game with the last second miss there.

What the hell happened in the first part of this game . Because the game i saw in the 3rd wasnt the same team that must have shown up in the 1st. We were taking the entire game over in the 3rd period. MMMmmm.... thats odd isnt it, what happened to make us change so drasticlly in that time frame? Did guys just try hrder suddenly or did we make adjustments that worked?? Lets figure it out and try to do it for 60 mins next time. Nice dynamic finish, but where was the start?

Nice to see Yakupov getting some points, keep feeding him the puck boys, elevate him if we can . Nice bounceback tonight, nice effort under less than optimal circumstances. I am glad we left Dubby where he was, maturation comes in many forms

It would have probably been good to see the level of micro-managment we saw in the 3rd much earlier but I wasnt watching this one early so I dont know what the problems were. I do know I would hve liked to have seen another two periods because we seemed to have dialed them in there for most of the thrird period. We were coming on without a doubt.

They were dominated by a tired team on a back to back. It was 5-1 when the Oil scored 2 late meaningless goals against a team who had one skate already off and were thinking about their next game.

Avatar
#153 TDSM31
April 16 2013, 11:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
NewAgeSys wrote:

Darn it I slept through the better part of this game but it doesnt look so bad now. Wonder why we werent doing this sooner?

i must say that the men work their butts off for Ralph when he pulls the tender so early, they must appreciate the opportunity, but they sure surprise me how few times we are scored against when we do this early pull move, I hope it never backfires in the playoffs.

Lets look on the bright side but this was essentially a 5-4 game with the last second miss there.

What the hell happened in the first part of this game . Because the game i saw in the 3rd wasnt the same team that must have shown up in the 1st. We were taking the entire game over in the 3rd period. MMMmmm.... thats odd isnt it, what happened to make us change so drasticlly in that time frame? Did guys just try hrder suddenly or did we make adjustments that worked?? Lets figure it out and try to do it for 60 mins next time. Nice dynamic finish, but where was the start?

Nice to see Yakupov getting some points, keep feeding him the puck boys, elevate him if we can . Nice bounceback tonight, nice effort under less than optimal circumstances. I am glad we left Dubby where he was, maturation comes in many forms

It would have probably been good to see the level of micro-managment we saw in the 3rd much earlier but I wasnt watching this one early so I dont know what the problems were. I do know I would hve liked to have seen another two periods because we seemed to have dialed them in there for most of the thrird period. We were coming on without a doubt.

NewAgeSys, how many lines have you done tonight?...and I'm not talking about lines of text.

Avatar
#154 Gerald R. Ford
April 17 2013, 07:04AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
steelymac wrote:

Hey faithfull,anyone else out there think Jack Michals shoulda followed Dithers out the door?Listen to the guy he gets more jacked up(no pun intended) when the other teams scores than the OIL.I really get the scense he get on Stauffers nerves.

$tauffer's nerves can suck it. Jack Michaels is one of the few things this organization has even come CLOSE to getting right in the last few years. He's not Rod, but he's distinct, keeps my interest, and calls a good game. I would never have listened to another radio broadcast if they had given the permanent play-by-play job to Bob. $tauffer was probably more annoyed about that guy he gave the free tickets to winning the 50/50 last night, and not getting a cut...

Comments are closed for this article.