GODSPEED, CRAIG MACTAVISH

Lowetide
April 29 2013 10:36PM

A Craig MacTavish media conference is always worth the price of admission, and today he rolled out "the plan" for this summer: although it will stop short of a complete makeover, we may not recognize major portions of the roster when the leaves begin to fall.

ROLE PLAYERS

MacT spoke today about role players, about getting better bottom 6F's who could deliver more in all areas of the game. He made a tremendous statement about the 3 and 4 lines:

  • "We had a lot of guys that the best they were going to be in any given game was a non-factor."

If you're an Oiler forward who spent significant time in the bottom 6 and didn't deliver offense, that's an absolutely chilling statement.

5x5/60 (bottom 6F)

  1. Ryan Jones 1.38
  2. Lennart Petrell 1.36
  3. Shawn Horcoff 1.34
  4. Ryan Smyth 1.23
  5. Eric Belanger 0.66
  6. Mike Brown 0.42
  7. Teemu Hartikainen nil

From that list, we can be pretty certain about Horcoff, fairly certain about Smyth and Brown, and at least include Jones as a "possible" for this coming year.

Fair?

BLUE AS BLUE CAN BE

The blueline is going to see some turnover, MacT mentioned Whitney as a goner and it would seem Peckham's future will be elsewhere too. There is some talent on defense, just not enough.

  • “We need more footspeed to play the style that best suits our skill-set. We have to move the puck quicker and the defencemen have to skate into open ice to get them the puck. We didn’t get back hard enough on breakouts.”

The blue all struggled at times this season (especially when playing with Ryan Whitney) but it would be a shock to see any of Justin Schultz, Ladislav Smid or Jeff Petry sent away. Nick Schultz is probably secure too, but with as many as 8 roster spots turned over that's not a certainty. It should be mentioned that Mark Fistric had a solid year (as per the link) and Potter was miles from being the problem.

Can the Oilers add two veterans to Smid-Petry and Schultz's? That's a tall order.

THE ELUSIVE POWER FORWARD

The GM also spoke about three small skill forwards with duplicate skills not being able to get things done, and that can only mean a powerforward entering the picture. On a team that hasn't had a real one since Billy Guerin, some media members feel Nathan Horton is a target.

  • Jim Matheson: I believe the Oilers will go hard after Boston Bruins forward Nathan Horton, who is also an UFA.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

If Craig MacTavish can find a way to add Nathan Horton, a top 4 defender and some depth on the bottom 6 forwards, he'll have accomplished something no Oiler GM has managed since 2006 spring: a balanced roster with enough quality and depth to have some real sustain during the long NHL season.

Godspeed, Craig MacTavish. Godspeed.

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on Team 1260.
Avatar
#1 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
April 29 2013, 10:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Many vets have some "splainin" to do when it comes to yr end meetings with MacTavish. Might want to make sure that trap door is still working Craig.

Deadwood out, new blood/rookies in needs to continue. Horton's only one chicken wing away from being on the shelf for a few months. Let someone else give him 5.5-6 a year for a few 35 game seasons. Rather have Clarkson.

Avatar
#2 Jasmine
April 29 2013, 10:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Next up, is Connor McJesus.

Some fans need some 'splainin' to do as well as why they constantly want Gagner gone. MacT had praises for Gagner unlike some so-called Oilers fans.

Avatar
#3 Cheap Shot Charlie
April 29 2013, 10:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

LT, I agree with your list of droppable players, but I'm not confident with Horton. Does he have the health and motivation the Oil need?

Avatar
#4 Sid
April 29 2013, 10:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Horton is one hit away from being out of the NHL

Avatar
#5 DrunkGuyTy
April 29 2013, 10:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Jasmine

What, out of the first three comments or the article, prompted you to bring that up? You're such a rash.

Avatar
#7 admiralmark
April 29 2013, 11:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

In light of all the "pro" player moves that appear to be on the horizon i found his comment on Morey Gare and the Pro Scouting Dept to be the most disheartening. I dont see how they can be given a vote of confidence based on track record. And to say they are "diligent"?? How does diligence equate to competence? A monkey can diligently try to hammer a a square peg in a round hole all day long.

Avatar
#8 DK0
April 29 2013, 11:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Lowetide

Hard to leak any information when you're in your office generating zero information...

Avatar
#9 Bicepus Maximus - Huge fan boy!
April 29 2013, 11:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Sid wrote:

Horton is one hit away from being out of the NHL

Prior to the last two years, in which he's suffered two fairly serious concussions, his injury history wasn't that bad.

Still, you have to think that will hurt him in this summer's contract negotiations. But who knows. This is the new NHL, where players are signing contacts in excess of $100M.

Avatar
#10 Oilcan
April 29 2013, 11:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jasmine wrote:

Some fans need some 'splainin' to do as well as why they constantly want Gagner gone. MacT had praises for Gagner unlike some so-called Oilers fans.

Because most Oiler fans know something about hockey and know there is more then just putting up points. I dont thinkanyone would argue Gagner is a bad player, I think most would say he is a good scorer, but where the Oilers are at and with the makeup of their roster it doesn't seem like Gagner fits (if the team truly wants to improve and balance) there are too many flaws in Gagners game (in relation to Oiler needs) to justify the contract he will be seeking.

Flaws: Small, weak in the tough areas, poor defensively, horrible on face-offs.

He is a gifted scorer but the Oilers would be better off getting something of value for him and signing Weiss for 3.5-4.0 then keeping Gagner. Weiss won't be the scorer Gagner is but he would compliment the 2nd line with his skill set.

Avatar
#11 DonDon
April 29 2013, 11:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

From MacTavish" "We had a lot of guys that the best they were going to be in any given game was a non-factor."

From Lowetide: "If you're an Oiler forward who spent significant time in the bottom 6 and didn't deliver offense, that's an absolutely chilling statement."

Further from Lowetide: "From that list, we can be pretty certain about Horcoff, fairly certain about Smyth and Brown, and at least include Jones as a "possible" for this coming year."

Maybe Smyth, but why should we be pretty certain about Horcoff, Brown and Jones? They constitute half of the bottom six problem. Hanging onto any of these non-factors takes away from a balanced roster. And what about Petrell, Hartikainen, Belanger, Eager and Smithson? They are no better.

On the whole, the Oiler veteran forwards were the non-factors alluded to by MacTavish.

Avatar
#12 Bicepus Maximus - Huge fan boy!
April 29 2013, 11:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I wasn't surprised to hear MacT talk the way he did about Gagner.

What was interesting is the possibility of moving Gagner to wing. For years now, we've debated where Gagner fits as a center on this team. Looks like Mac already has a very possible original solution.

Moving Gagner to wing would be a small bold move that I applaud.

Avatar
#13 Taylor Gang
April 30 2013, 12:04AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jasmine wrote:

Some fans need some 'splainin' to do as well as why they constantly want Gagner gone. MacT had praises for Gagner unlike some so-called Oilers fans.

If Gagner could play solid two way hockey, win a draw, and play with more sandpaper, then they'd keep him. Unfortunately, Sam's ticket out of YEG comes in the form of a 12 year old boy named Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, who in his rookie year beat Gagner's career year. Gagner can be as good offensively as he wants, but RNH always will be favored.

Avatar
#14 Taylor Gang
April 30 2013, 12:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I believe our biggest problem these past years is the notion of youth.

On paper, it seems brilliant to have all young players because they will be good. But in the real NHL it just doesn't work. Unless you're Sidney Crosby, chances are you won't have much consistency for scoring. And that was outlined more prominently this year than ever before. You want to know the difference between us and Chicago? They had established veteran talent along with the young kids to contribute as well.

While our defense was indeed a concern, I think our real issue was consistency from our young forward group.

Avatar
#15 Crispy
April 30 2013, 12:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

These "bold moves" MacT wants to make kind of scares me. I'd really like us to keep that #7 pick. We will be able to draft one of Monahan, Lindholm, or Nichushkin. If they don't make the team (or are in the khl for now), that's fine- we will need some value contracts, like ELC's in the future when we"re contenders, and any one of those three would fit in nicely down the road. The only bold move including our #7 I'd like to see is if we could move up to take Barkov.

Avatar
#16 Will
April 30 2013, 12:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

So if, and believe me it's a big if, Monahan is still on the board (F#*% you Calgary), does anyone think we could package our first and Gagner to Philly for their first and Coturier? I mean they basically draft a replacement in Monahan while also getting a much more proven skilled centre in Gagner, who might even play better with some of the bigger forwards they have on that team, and we get a big tough second line centre.

Then at 11, we could be free to draft one of the big mean remaining defencemen, Nichushkin if he's fallen that for because of his "Russian Factor" (Coutier, Yak, Nichushkin = most awesome forward line to watch in all of hockey). Or it wouldn't be such a reach to draft Gauthier which would give the Oilers something they haven't had in a long time: Depth and size down the middle.

Or alternatively, same first and Gagner package for Phoenix's first and Yandle. Sure we leave a big gaping hole at second line centre, but we have that top pairing puck moving point machine on D, who isn't over the hill and has a good contract. Plus we could still draft Gauthier and get what we need in a year to come.

Does anyone think these deals are plausible or am I overvaluing Gagner?

Avatar
#17 719
April 30 2013, 12:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Crispy wrote:

These "bold moves" MacT wants to make kind of scares me. I'd really like us to keep that #7 pick. We will be able to draft one of Monahan, Lindholm, or Nichushkin. If they don't make the team (or are in the khl for now), that's fine- we will need some value contracts, like ELC's in the future when we"re contenders, and any one of those three would fit in nicely down the road. The only bold move including our #7 I'd like to see is if we could move up to take Barkov.

Exactly

Avatar
#18 Jimmer
April 30 2013, 12:30AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@LT

Any chance Ryan O'Reilly is a person of interest for McT? Colorado just won the draft and will pick Seth Jones. Obviously they don't want to pay O'Reilly the money he is making...how about a Gagner + pick for him?

Avatar
#19 Johe
April 30 2013, 12:30AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Out- Ales Hemsky, Eric Belanger, Darcy Hordichuk, Theo Peckham, Lennart Petrell, Ryan Whitney, Ryan Smyth, Nikolai Khabibulin, Corey Potter, 2013 1st rounder,

In- Oscar Klefbom, Nathan Horton, Brian Bickell,Kevin Shattenkirk,2013 3rd rounder, Matt Hendricks, Thomas Greiss, Brendan Smith, Kyle Chipchura

Avatar
#20 Jdrevenge
April 30 2013, 12:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Watched all the post game interviews and after watching Hemmer comment, I'm actually going to be disappointed to see him go. Despite all his warts he seems to have that knack of showing up when it's all on the line.

Nothing more exciting than watching him make a team look stupid at full flight and then tucking the puck passed a goaltender while slamming into a goal post.

Tough decisions....

Avatar
#21 westcoastoil
April 30 2013, 01:12AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

He mentioned having 3 players of the same type on one line as something that doesn't work. I don't think they can move forward with Gags, Ebs & Hemsky all in the top 6. I'll be sad to see Hemsky go - it's been a pleasure to watch his skill.

I think Hall would lose his mind if Ebs got traded, but as great a player as he is/will be (& I do like him) at $6M his might be the contract you aren't too fond of in the future and he could likely garner a stud D in a trade. But wow you'd have to get that one 100% right.

Avatar
#22 Mike
April 30 2013, 04:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

L.T. have you checked out Dark Horse Analytics? MacT referenced it in his recent After Hours interview on HNIC.

He didn't exactly exhaust the subject but I'm wondering if this is a statistical technique to forecast future performance of a player early in his minor hockey years(pre-draft) or existing pros with a history of statistics with which to work.

The results seemed to impress the new GM. I wonder if the the Oil have used this system already.

Avatar
#23 Cody anderson
April 30 2013, 05:37AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jasmine wrote:

Some fans need some 'splainin' to do as well as why they constantly want Gagner gone. MacT had praises for Gagner unlike some so-called Oilers fans.

I have always argued that Gags showed more then enough upside to be our future 2nd line centre.

This year he got enough points that his value will be very high. I think it is a major obstacle having neither of your top 2 centres able to win a draw. If we move him to the wing it leaves a hole at centre and still does nothing about the size of the top 6.

I would certainly listen to offers and if you can get a power forward or draft a good #2 centre and get a top 4 dman for Gags I would say the time to trade him has come.

I understand his value and even saw a huge increase in his compete level. He attempted to play with more fire and grit then anyone on the roster outside of Hall and Smid, but you have to trade value to recieve it back. This would get us a piece we are missing and keep the main core together.

Avatar
#24 mayorblaine
April 30 2013, 06:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

1. no Weber - do not trade for Weber. this would be poor decision.

2. unless you can trade up for Seth, trade the pick + for that power forward/bigger center that is a need.

wants have no place in decisions ahead. only needs.

oh, and hi.

Avatar
#25 The Beaker
April 30 2013, 06:44AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jimmer wrote:

@LT

Any chance Ryan O'Reilly is a person of interest for McT? Colorado just won the draft and will pick Seth Jones. Obviously they don't want to pay O'Reilly the money he is making...how about a Gagner + pick for him?

The avs cant trade him until one calander year after signing him. Plus drafting jones doesnt impact the pay structure for another 3 years really.

Avatar
#26 NewAgeSys
April 30 2013, 06:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think that Darkhorse simply repackages the NewAge Hockey Systems data from online and sells it to the Oilers.

I think mac-T knows this very well and is publicly supporting darkhorse to support this stance.The Oilers get quality and innovative data for essentially free,or rather their resource gets it for free,and launders it nice and clean for the Oilers,and gives them a Bill of Sale,cutting the source of the NHS data out of the picture nice and cleanly.Mac-T said they Dig"or"scrape"their data from online,nice try pal,you are trying to justify how your team got the NHS data that can clearly be linked to it,to bad the data stream started BEFORE Darkhorse was even in the picture eh?

The Oilers and darkhorse are trying to make the fans believe that they are the source of the fmany of the consistant positive inputs the team has been recieving from online for 3 years running.They will go to all ends to deny that any outside influence could affect them this way,they refuse to validate this source and retain it ,instead they find a statistical placebo and actively supress the Intuitive source of the data they have and still do use.

The NHS has for 3 years consistantly exposed the Oilers managerial shortcomings,and it has exposed an epiclly inferior system of play,it has identified systemic influences as being the catalyst of the Oilers long history of futility..

Pick a side,sooner or later everyone will have to. L.T have you read up on the NHS yet,maybe you should get the real deal.

Darkhorse and other Data mining companies are limited by the scraps they can find,they CREATE nothing,what happens when the data source dries up?Well Mac-T lets hear your explanation,you seem to have a man crush on Darkhorse so speak up pal,you already picked your team,sorry for your luck.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend and the Flames are looking pretty good as a home for the NHS,if only to teach this smart-ass group a lesson.No wonder teams can dominate us cerebrally so easily,we are handicapped by our need for a protectionist attitude and stance,we are constantly wasting energy in the wrong areas because of this now historic problem.INTEGRITY,Mac-T,or grab your ankles and brace yourself for a ride like nothing you have seen before when the Flames proceed to dissect your team till you retire.

I am thinking I like St.Louis to win the cup this year,hows about we see if we can make that happen be tossing them some NHS Intuitive Dynamic Analysis this year,huh?I wonder if Douggie Weight is interested in satisfying his curiosity he had kindled last year during the playoffs?

Avatar
#27 Citizen David
April 30 2013, 07:03AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

So MacT, and pretty much everyone else, recognizes that our bottom 6 doesn't have enough compete or enough depth scoring... So why are people ok with keeping 80-90% of our Bottom 6?! I would like our fourth line next year to be Brian Boyle, George Parros, Ryan Jones. Our third line Shawn Horcoff can stay for one more year, Paajarvi one winger, one new winger. Mike Brown can be the 13th forward. Ryan Smyth out, Pettrel out, smithson out, Hemsky out, Hartikainen to AHL or traded.

As for Defense, I've always wanted the Oilers to get Ryan Ellis. He's not a top Defensemen but he moves the puck well and will give us offense from the D.

Avatar
#28 NewAgeSys
April 30 2013, 07:03AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think Mac-T should insert the words NewAge Hockey System everywhere he says Darkhorse.

I wonder why Mac-T felt it necessary to take a protectionist stance behind Darkhorse and to publicly state they "scrape'their data from online?Maybe to cover up the fact that the same data that is being scraped,was first offer to ,rejected and then "suppressed" by the Oilers.

Mac-T doesnt seem to be the type of man to lack integrity,but the fact he supports the suppression and then the aquisition and the laundering of another mans ideas is somehow sad to me.To be frank,the team deserves the results they will recieve from this type of managment.

Say it Mac-T,NewAge Hockey System.

Avatar
#29 SrCain
April 30 2013, 07:13AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
Jasmine wrote:

Some fans need some 'splainin' to do as well as why they constantly want Gagner gone. MacT had praises for Gagner unlike some so-called Oilers fans.

You do realize all oiler fans are allowed to have an opinion right? They are also allowed to disagree with each other. You have absolutely ZERO right to question these "so-called" oiler fans simply because they don't necessarily share your thoughts. Your always on here wanting posters to "stop bashing this and stop bashing that " while you constantly "bash" ppl who disagree with. Get over yourself.

Avatar
#30 The Real Scuba Steve
April 30 2013, 07:17AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

So other say 3 years rebuilding the rebuild, 10 years without playoffs that's a hard pill to take. Well at least the new arena will be built by then.

Avatar
#31 The Real Scuba Steve
April 30 2013, 07:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
SrCain wrote:

You do realize all oiler fans are allowed to have an opinion right? They are also allowed to disagree with each other. You have absolutely ZERO right to question these "so-called" oiler fans simply because they don't necessarily share your thoughts. Your always on here wanting posters to "stop bashing this and stop bashing that " while you constantly "bash" ppl who disagree with. Get over yourself.

Jasmine are you really Kevin Lowe?

Avatar
#32 gcw_rocks
April 30 2013, 07:22AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Horton would be a HUGE risk if its a long term deal. Almost no chance he can play out a long term deal with his concussion history.

Avatar
#33 oliveoilers
April 30 2013, 07:30AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

did anybody else just scroll through NAS's posts without reading them?

Avatar
#34 BingBong
April 30 2013, 07:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I'm thinking the only guys who we know will be in the bottom 6 at this moment are Horcoff and Pajaarvi. Maybe Jones as he does have a knack for scoring. Brown and Smyth stay but in a perfect (healthy) world they'd be in the pressbox. Hemsky's gone, and we replace him with a big vet for the top 6. (Hence the Horton talk...) Khabbi's gone, replace him with a cheap vet. The defense is still the big question mark - we realistically need a good puck mover and a good defensive guy, both top 4. That might be tough.

Avatar
#35 Sliderule
April 30 2013, 07:37AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

When MacT said that oiler top six have to play better away from puck he is spot on.

The top six got 76 goals which compares well with Kings 84 .This is especially so with Nuge only getting four

Their plus minus was minus 12 vs kings plus 28.That tells the tale

When MacT says they may just add Klefbom I think he realizes that the defence isn't the whole problem.The oiler forwards coverage in their own zone is brutal and has to get a lot better if they want to make playoffs.

Avatar
#36 TrentonL
April 30 2013, 07:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

What ever happened to talk of bringing back Grebeshkov? A top 6 D of say:

Streit-Petry Smid-N.Schultz Grebeshkov-J.Schultz

would be a huge improvement over this year.

How about Thoresen? The guy has ripped up the KHL and would be a huge upgrade on our bottom 6.

Avatar
#37 Eddie Shore
April 30 2013, 07:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
TrentonL wrote:

What ever happened to talk of bringing back Grebeshkov? A top 6 D of say:

Streit-Petry Smid-N.Schultz Grebeshkov-J.Schultz

would be a huge improvement over this year.

How about Thoresen? The guy has ripped up the KHL and would be a huge upgrade on our bottom 6.

Softest D in our division if thats what we go into next year with. Schultz x2, Grebeshkov and Streit are all stick first guys. I think that would be too much of the same thing back there.

Avatar
#38 TrentonL
April 30 2013, 07:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Nevermind Thor re-signed through next season in February.

http://en.rsport.ru/hockey/20130202/642915411.html

Avatar
#39 TrentonL
April 30 2013, 07:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Eddie Shore wrote:

Softest D in our division if thats what we go into next year with. Schultz x2, Grebeshkov and Streit are all stick first guys. I think that would be too much of the same thing back there.

I'd take an effective stick first guy over a wreckum peckham anyday.

Avatar
#40 Obiwan Eberle - Team Silver Fox
April 30 2013, 07:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Mac T spoke about doing something with the 7th pick and the draft being a deep one...tell

Mac T spoke highly of Gags, but did mention face-offs and moving him to the wing. He's a righty so which line would he play RW on?

Mac T is continually speaking about analytics....so the fact that Gags is terrible defensively (well not terrible, but definitely subpar) must be well known.

My prediction: Gags and the 7th go for a better 2 way center and a much later pick....

Avatar
#41 oliveoilers
April 30 2013, 07:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I agree with mikey. Someone to scare the beejeesus out of anyone crossing the blue line. A Fistric with footspeed and a little more hockey sense. Fistric at least tries to make the right plays, even if the execution can be sometimes be found wanting.

Avatar
#42 Eddie Shore
April 30 2013, 07:54AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

What about signing Streit(or Jordan Leopold if Streit isnt available) and say Andrew Ference? That would give the Oilers another solid puck mover, who can actually play defence, as well as a tougher to play against guy who isnt scared to stir things up. Both with NHL experience.

Avatar
#43 pelhem grenville
April 30 2013, 08:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

...LT who is this aumont woman i lust for this a.m. thankyou btw ...especially like the hi-light tattoo pattern she's had done ala. mike tyson

sorta back to the point here though...with the colorados picking the jones boy is there room for a former 1st overall pick like erik johnson on our squad to start to bolster our blue ?

Avatar
#44 pelhem grenville
April 30 2013, 08:22AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

thought i liked nathan horton...turns out i just liked his smokin' hot playboy playmate wife ...nevermind no nathan thanks

Avatar
#45 Space Dad
April 30 2013, 08:28AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

While there probably are some things to be gleaned from what MacT says about his team in these pressers, people are reading into his words way too much.

"Oh no! Oilers aren't going to be moving Gagner... MacT seems to like him a lot." Well, let's see - if you were going to move a piece like Gagner, would you downplay his ability and publicly bring up the warts of his game? or would you pump him up in the media, hoping to generate high interest in him? If it was general knowledge that MacT didn't like this player or that, how is he going to maximize the return for said player?

If you look at the pieces the Oilers have at their disposal to use to bring in a strong, two-way, left-shooting defenseman... Gagner is the best one. Management does not want to trade any of the 5 wonderkids (Hall, Eberle, Yak, Nuge, Schultz) and you have to give something to get something.

MacT is not going to show his hand to the media - even Mr. Dithers understood the importance of that. It's more likely that he will use the media to generate interest in the players he is open to moving. If he's doing his job properly, trying to get an accurate read on how he feels about certain players by what he says in his press conferences should be a fruitless endeavour.

Avatar
#46 CaptainLander
April 30 2013, 08:28AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think the Blues may need to make a move to drop some salary, with Pietrangelo, Shattenkirk, Bergland and Stewart all RFAs this year. A well timed offer sheet or to any one of these guys would be a good move in my books. St. Louis will fight hard to keep them but money is tight there and they have a lot of what the Oil will be looking for. Heck trading for on of Steen, Backes works as well.

Avatar
#47 Spydyr
April 30 2013, 09:01AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Matty at the Journal mentioned both Dustin Byfuglien and Cal Clutterbuck may be available.

If possible trade for both. Hemsky , Gagner anyone outside of Kleff not on the team. Anyone not named PRV in the bottom 6. If you trade Gagner grab a free agent center.

Move Dustin back to the wing where he is best. He would look awesome with the kids.

Put Cal on your 4th line to crush people.

Pick up top pairing d-man and a young goalie to push Dubbie.Tweak the bottom 6 a bit. Now you have a more rounded team.

Avatar
#48 Ducey
April 30 2013, 09:05AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Bicepus Maximus - Huge fan boy! wrote:

Prior to the last two years, in which he's suffered two fairly serious concussions, his injury history wasn't that bad.

Still, you have to think that will hurt him in this summer's contract negotiations. But who knows. This is the new NHL, where players are signing contacts in excess of $100M.

He has had a broken leg and shoulder surgery (so he has that out of the way) but the concussions really scare me.

He only fought twice this year and he suffered a concussion in the second one. He will be a big body but he will need to play soft (no hitting or fighting) to stay in the lineup.

Avatar
#49 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
April 30 2013, 09:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
pelhem grenville wrote:

thought i liked nathan horton...turns out i just liked his smokin' hot playboy playmate wife ...nevermind no nathan thanks

You can tell a lot about a potential Oilers future by just looking at his wife. West Edmonton Mall just isn't cutting it anymore I guess.

....i'm, too sexy for the YEG, too sexy for YEG...me's so awesome it hurts...

Avatar
#50 15w40
April 30 2013, 09:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Jeff Petry and Hartakainen to the Leafs for Cody Franson and Joe Colborne. Pretty even swap but gives both teams a bit of a new look.

Maybe Carlyle can bring out the nasty in the Finn

Sign Boyd Gordon - leave Lander in the minors. Look at Colby Armstrong for some proven sandpaper

Comments are closed for this article.