Meaningful Games in April

Jonathan Willis
April 09 2013 08:48AM

One of the items that the optimists watching the Edmonton Oilers have pointed to as a sign of progress is the fact that the team is playing meaningful games this late in the season. They were still in it at the deadline and they were still in it in April; these are big improvements over previous years.

Or are they?

It Isn’t A Normal Season

The fact is, with the compressed schedule, being in the hunt in April of this year is roughly akin to being in the hunt in January if last year; at 40 games, the difference between the also-rans and the nearly-ins and the barely-ins is a lot smaller than it is after 80 games.

That becomes pretty clear when comparing the Oilers’ record this season after 39 games to the Oilers’ record last season after 39 games:

  • 2013: 16-16-7, 39 points, minus-7 goal differential
  • 2011-12: 16-20-3, 35 points, minus-4 goal differential

It’s a four point improvement, but in terms of wins and losses the Oilers are actually in the exact same position as they were one season ago; the difference is entirely the result of four losses taking place after regulation rather than in 60 minutes. The Oilers slumped in the last half of 2011-12, while in 2013 there is no last half of the season to slump in. Ultimately, though, they’re at a pretty comparable place to where they were a year ago.

The difference is that the 39th game a year ago was the start of January; this time it’s the start of April.

The Shot Numbers

Another item to consider is goaltending. The single-biggest factor in the Oilers’ late season slump in 2011-12 was Nikolai Khabibulin’s implosion, just as the single-biggest factor in their early season dominance was Khabibulin’s brilliance. He went 11-8-3 with a 0.932 save percentage before Christmas, then 1-12-4 with a 0.881 save percentage afterward. In other words: the team’s early success and late failure was distorted first by Khabibulin’s excellence and then his struggles.

This year, the goaltending’s been solid throughout, giving the Oilers an advantage last year’s team didn’t have. If we remove goaltending from the equation, and just look at shots for and shots against, how does this year’s group compare to last year’s?

  • 2013: 1055 shots for, 1281 against; Oilers take 45.2% of all shots
  • 2011-12: 2186 shots for, 2518 shots against; Oilers take 46.5% of all shots

Basically, although individual players (hello, Taylor Hall) have taken significant strides, the team as a whole isn’t doing any better at out-shooting the opposition. That’s a problem, and suggests that the improvements the team has made are only skin deep. If not for Devan Dubnyk taking the starting job and running with it, there might be some uncomfortable questions being asked of the management group right now.

Recently around the Nation Network

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 Quicksilver ballet
April 09 2013, 09:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

1-8 down the stretch please. Blowing the Lames out by a touchdown will be fine for me. This team clearly needs more lottery type help sooner rather than later. If the kids aren't on/win it by themselves, the veterans are often nowhere to be found. A Vet of two out, and another rookie in please.

Hemsky,Gagner,Horcoff,Smyth and Whitney yada yada yada, all missing in action when needed most. Nothing but a bunch of prima donnas when it mattered most. This team isn't going anywhere till most, if not all of these guys are gone. Being the shot blocking gurus of the NHL is only a reflection of the puck always being in our end.

Solid article Jonathan, if any, only micro improvements have been made. The kids are doing more whilst the vets do even less.

Avatar
#2 Robin Brownlee
April 09 2013, 09:33AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Four points better BUT in terms of wins and losses . . . but nothing. Four points more is four points more.

If you take Dubnyk out of the equation . . . he's a part of the team, right? So, the goaltending has been better and more consistent but that matters less than, say, shots for an against as an indication of progress?

I think I'll put more weight in having Dubnyk establish that he's capable of being a NO. 1 goaltender -- that WAS a big question, right? -- than in shot count.

Avatar
#3 Will
April 09 2013, 09:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Hopefully they figure it out this summer. I can understand how they might not have wanted to throw away the future on a shortened season, but this is simply the last year for excuses. Either they build a good team and we make the playoffs by closing out games when we have the lead, or gutting out a win in a close game,

Or we continue to be soft, and our rebuild is Tampa Bay: we have some great players, but a bad team.

Avatar
#4 Neal
April 09 2013, 09:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

"there might be some uncomfortable questions being asked of the management group" ????? You're kidding right? It must be great to be an executive at Rexall; having a kind and supportive owner who doesn't worry about results and overlooks glaring mistakes. Ignoring both errors of commission and omission. Looks to be THE best place for young people who don't get zeros to go work!

"might be some uncomfortable questions"??????

WTF?????

Avatar
#5 Mike Krushelnyski
April 09 2013, 11:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Seguin and Hall (2010), Hopkins and Larsson(2011), and last summers possibility of Galchenyuk and Ryan Murray(2012). Little doubt one of these deals would've made the Oilers a stronger group going forward with a more motivated management group. Their inactivity has us headed closer to an Infinibuild than a rebuild it appears.

You're saying that all three #1 picks have been the wrong choice?

Wow, I'm no Tambellini fan, but the one thing he's managed to do right is walk up to the podium on draft day and pick the consensus best player.

Avatar
#6 Ducey
April 09 2013, 11:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

This really isn't that complicated.

They finished 29th last year. They are tied for 21st this year.

Thats the only improvement that matters.

Plus the sample size is pretty small. You need to adjust for home and away and strength of schedule.

If you would have done the comparison before they lost to 3 of the best teams in the league, it would look more favourable.

I prefer to look at whether they have core pieces in place. Last year they had maybe 5 players in place that you could say were their core going forward (Hall, Nuge, Ebs, Smid, Petry). This year they have added Gagner, Dubnyk, MPS, Schulz Jr, and Yak.

Doubling the number of good players you can project forward is a significant achievement.

Avatar
#7 The Beaker
April 09 2013, 12:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Smokey wrote:

NO MORE HORCOFF, move on, buy him out, let the ship sail...

People still think this?

Avatar
#8 106 and 106
April 09 2013, 09:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@JW

"...There might be some uncomfortable questions being asked of the management group right now."

Shouldn't there be uncomfortable questions being asked every-season you "manage" a team that can't compete? Pro athletes will only keep their muzzle on for so long before someone pipes up about bad management.

Avatar
#9 season not played
April 09 2013, 09:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

At what point do uncomfortable questions begin to get asked?

Avatar
#10 Spydyr
April 09 2013, 09:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

This is the summer to actually build a team to compete.

Even us bloggers know what needs to be done. Just get it done. The losing end of the rebuild HAS to end this summer. The goal all along was to compete for the Cup in the new arena. That time is getting closer.

If the present management group cannot do it. They should be replaced with a group that can.

Avatar
#11 Oilcan
April 09 2013, 11:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I think a full season and a training camp would have done alot more to help improve this team. Yes they have holes, but a training camp would have helped Schultz and Yakupov way more, longer season means more practice time and for a rookie coach this could have been huge.

I do think the Oilers need to stop hoping players can fill a spot and succeed and put them in a position where they know they can succeed.

I would love to see a 3rd line of Paajarvi-Horcoff-Hartaikenen.

I think the second line needs a retooling, I liked Gags development this year but I think he needs to go for a top pairing dman (make a hockey trade) and I would trade Hemsky for a 2nd line Center. Play Yakupov on the RW for the 2nd line.

Avatar
#12 Spydyr
April 09 2013, 12:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Will wrote:

"Free spot on their bingo card", wow.

30-30-29

Soon to be out of the playoffs for 7 years.

Say 25 this year.

One of the softest teams in the NHL to play against.

Yes, free spot.

Avatar
#13 Quicksilver ballet
April 09 2013, 12:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Mike Krushelnyski wrote:

You're saying that all three #1 picks have been the wrong choice?

Wow, I'm no Tambellini fan, but the one thing he's managed to do right is walk up to the podium on draft day and pick the consensus best player.

Please re-read and try and comprehend what was said. See the AND (as in BOTH)between the names mentioned, big difference between what I mentioned and what you accused me of saying. Edumacation is your friend, my friend.

If one of those deals had been made, the Oilers would be better off today. Old useless vets out, new blood in. It's almost to the point of no return now. If this isn't corrected lickity split, i suspect one of the fab 5 asks to be moved before too long. Hanging onto these tired, overpaid and oft-underachieving veterans is killing this team. Those two possible 2nd rounders Whitney may have fetched look pretty good now don't they Mr. Tambellini?

Avatar
#14 Shredder
April 09 2013, 09:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

This team, despite still being streaky, still seems to have more compete level. The games they've lost seem to be by a slimmer margin (ie: 1 goal games like last night), as well as the 1 goal wins like Yak's big celly...

I see this as a better team. But only as far as "saw them good" goes. I think certain players are pushing for the wins more, and becoming more consistent in their efforts (ex: Gagner). This rebuild isn't complete, so I'm still looking at the little wins, such as Paajarvi taking big strides forward.

I want the Oilers to push for the playoffs in the worst way, but there's no doubt it still needs to improve. How much of that can come from players growing and maturing?

Avatar
#15 Jdrevenge
April 09 2013, 09:55AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I'm with RB on this. Your points are effective but ignored some of the key up arrows.

It's too bad we won't play a full season to measure. I think we've seen progres.

Avatar
#16 Jon
April 09 2013, 09:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

The problem with losing out the season for the sake of draft picks is that it is a perpetuation of our current situation. Yes, it will land us a nice rookie, but until this team is competitive nobody is going to want to play here. You can forget about FA's or players waiving NTC's to come be the stabilizing veteran presence this team needs (especially on D). This team needs to play hard, kick the crap out of some tough teams, and become a legitimate threat.

Avatar
#17 oliveoilers
April 09 2013, 09:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Jay-Dubya, you started so well, but got lost! You acknowledge that the compressed season shouldn't be compared to last season, then go on to compare them. What the duece!

The truth is any comparison has to have a point of reference to give it context. And seeing there hasn't been many compressed seasons to compare to, we're kinda stuck. The context this season is that teams hoping to make a run really cannot afford to lose many games. So, instead of a nicely paced season, tweaking things here and there, and the natural order of things finally sorting itself out over 80 games, we have everybody trying to get on the bus at once.

Otherwise, good points, as always well presented!

Avatar
#18 csaw84
April 09 2013, 09:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

JW,

The difference is that half the team had already been playing before this season started. Its not fair to compare seasons when this season is running on a compressed schedule, with no training camp, some players in mid-season form, some having not played in almost a year. Some teams records can be written off this year as an anomoly...ie; Philly.

By eye, this team is making strides, but still has a few areas to address. To say they've made little to no progress isn't likely a fair statement.

Avatar
#19 Quicksilver ballet
April 09 2013, 10:01AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

16 wins in 40 games doesn't exactly scream progress has been made.

Avatar
#20 Zamboni Driver
April 09 2013, 10:07AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think the picture with "PlayStation" underneath this time is just about perfect actually.

Avatar
#21 Halfwise
April 09 2013, 10:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

So far they've played 17 home games and 22 road games. Your numbers have to allow for that before you can make valid comparisons to last year.

Are the Oilers better this year? Probably. But the real question is "are they improving fast enough to get ahead of the rest of the league?"

We can look at the standings and agree to the answer, and the news is not happy.

The holes in the team are the same old holes. Is the failure to address those holes deliberate? If the answer is yes, shame on us fans for supporting the team. If the answer is no, shame on Katz for supporting management.

Avatar
#22 StHenriOilBomb
April 09 2013, 10:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think this team would have really benefited from a training camp.

Small steps this year, and big ones this summer.

I hope.

Avatar
#23 Shredder
April 09 2013, 10:24AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Robin Brownlee wrote:

Four points better BUT in terms of wins and losses . . . but nothing. Four points more is four points more.

If you take Dubnyk out of the equation . . . he's a part of the team, right? So, the goaltending has been better and more consistent but that matters less than, say, shots for an against as an indication of progress?

I think I'll put more weight in having Dubnyk establish that he's capable of being a NO. 1 goaltender -- that WAS a big question, right? -- than in shot count.

My thoughts here are similar. 4 points partway through a season may not seem like much, but that turns to 8 points over a full season. There's a lot more positive than negatives to take out of this season.

Avatar
#24 Ambassador humantorch
April 09 2013, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
season not played wrote:

At what point do uncomfortable questions begin to get asked?

In the Edmonton Oilers organization? Never. That's when.

Avatar
#26 Smokey
April 09 2013, 10:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

1-8 down the stretch please. Blowing the Lames out by a touchdown will be fine for me. This team clearly needs more lottery type help sooner rather than later. If the kids aren't on/win it by themselves, the veterans are often nowhere to be found. A Vet of two out, and another rookie in please.

Hemsky,Gagner,Horcoff,Smyth and Whitney yada yada yada, all missing in action when needed most. Nothing but a bunch of prima donnas when it mattered most. This team isn't going anywhere till most, if not all of these guys are gone. Being the shot blocking gurus of the NHL is only a reflection of the puck always being in our end.

Solid article Jonathan, if any, only micro improvements have been made. The kids are doing more whilst the vets do even less.

I agree with getting better player in the draft, hopefully finding a second line center or top 2 future defenseman in the draft. Fighting for playoff spots will suffice to some, I want a cup.

Hemsky, Smyth, Horcoff, Whitney are all missing in action in so many of these games, and that's the difference between a 10-11 club and a 8th place club. These kids are dragging these vets around the ice. This off season needs about getting rid of the old finally and getting cheaper more effective players.

To me it seems like the Oilers problem is not so much systems play, its not even compete some nights. Its about carrying momentum. You often have one, maybe two lines going and half your defence. The third and fourth line spend their time hemmed up in their own zone, killing any momentum the first or second line can generate. Half this team is quick and exciting, and then there are the vets that are slow and old and provide "leadership." (my big ass)

Avatar
#27 Smokey
April 09 2013, 10:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Will

Ya, we've become Tampa...I'd take loosing 6-5 over 2-1. I get your point however. Lots of talent, but the remaining holes are so big and never get filled. Sounds like our potholes.

Avatar
#28 Rama Lama
April 09 2013, 10:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Maybe Tamby is smarter than all of us?? His "do nothing", approach to management will ensure that we draft high again. If we keep doing this for another two to three years we will be the only team in the NHL to have six number one picks playing on the same team.

Go Tamby!

Avatar
#29 Mark-LW
April 09 2013, 10:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:

Dubnyk's play this year has certainly been a positive step for the team - but it's also served to paper over the lack of improvement in some other areas.

Ideally, the rest of the team would be moving forward at the same pace he is.

Exactly. The point isn't "nothing is better, and we can't take anything positive from this season over last". It's to show that while we have more points, the team as a whole is performing worse.

Having the same amount of regulation wins as last seasons team IS NOT improvement. Points earned in shootouts is more of a matter of luck than any indication of improving as a team.

Avatar
#30 Mark-LW
April 09 2013, 10:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Also;

The team being outshot by a bigger margin WITH Taylor Hall being much more dominant this season implies that other areas are not just stagnant, but getting much worse.

Avatar
#31 Bucknuck
April 09 2013, 10:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Considering that the Oilers won a whole bunch of games they shouldn't have early in the season (last year) with Khabibulin playing so well, and this year they had solid goaltending. Perhaps you can look at the rest of the numbers and figure that goaltending is a non-factor, because in both samples it was excellent.

How about if you compare January to January, and February to February and March to March and see what those numbers look like? Stats are slippery when you cherry pick.

At the end of the day this team still isn't good enough, which is the point I think you were trying to make. They have not improved as much as some folks would like us to think. So I agree with your point. Tambellini should be held accountable (IMO).

With the talent they have I think it's pretty clear that management isn't doing their job. I am glad they didn't blow the team up at the deadline again. I wanted to see how they played in these tough contests. We have our answer. They got pushed around like many thought they would.

The special teams have gotten much better and I think you can thank Ralph Kreuger for that, and also probably for the better win loss record as a result. Other than that, I think the team needs to have a better mix, and that is Tambellini's job.

Avatar
#32 Oilfred
April 09 2013, 11:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:

Dubnyk's play this year has certainly been a positive step for the team - but it's also served to paper over the lack of improvement in some other areas.

Ideally, the rest of the team would be moving forward at the same pace he is.

I don't know. This was a a developement year. We all knew that.

The big questions on any team are top 6F, top 4D, 1G.

The foward group is there although maybe a shuffle is needed.

The D is 3/4 answered.

It just a matter on filling in the pieces now.

Avatar
#33 etownman
April 09 2013, 11:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

If the Oilers maintain a .500 season this would be exactly where I thought they were capable of playing with the current roster. I would be happy with that improvement under those circumstances. Hall, Nuge & Ebs come as advertised & I think Yak will be a sniper with attitude! Don't see anybody intimidating that kid!

Opponents are shooting from everywhere on Dubnyk & for good reason! To me this is one of the reasons for a large shot count! He's a decent shot stopper but I don't really like the rest of his game! Every time he handles the puck it's a give away & it puts a lot of stress on the D! We have to have the poorest communication between D & G in the league in my opinion!

Avatar
#34 JDP
April 09 2013, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I've been saying this for awhile now....this team has talent but is way too smurfy.

Avatar
#35 Will
April 09 2013, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Smokey wrote:

Ya, we've become Tampa...I'd take loosing 6-5 over 2-1. I get your point however. Lots of talent, but the remaining holes are so big and never get filled. Sounds like our potholes.

Is it just me or are the pit holes like the worst they've ever been? There are car killers out there.

I think there have been a ton of positives this year. Hopefully in the off season we can trim some of the fat, get rid of the contracts that aren't doing anything for the team except taking up a spot in the press box, and finally balance out our top six.

I really like the idea someone proposed the other day about trying to trade Gags for Cotuier. I do think that is a valid trade that Philly would consider as Gagner is much more skilled, and still very young in his career.

There were some games we had no business winning this year, but there were also others that I can't believe we lost. If we can just get to the point where we're closing out just a few more of those games, we become a middle of the pack playoff team.

Avatar
#36 Ogie Oilthorpe
April 09 2013, 11:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

At this point the Oilers are going to get another good first round pick. Management needs to really decide who is untouchable on this team and who isn't. For me Hall and RNH are truly untouchable.They need to deal away one of the young stars plus Whitney, Potter, Jones, and Hemsky and a few draft picks to start pluggin holes. I think the fan base deserves a bit more from Tambo than another "savior" first overall expecting to pull the team out of the basement. Start selling assets to put the effin puzzle together. Tambo can't figure out a remote, how is he going to fix the rubix cube..

Avatar
#37 Quicksilver ballet
April 09 2013, 11:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Seguin and Hall (2010), Hopkins and Larsson(2011), and last summers possibility of Galchenyuk and Ryan Murray(2012). Little doubt one of these deals would've made the Oilers a stronger group going forward with a more motivated management group. Their inactivity has us headed closer to an Infinibuild than a rebuild it appears.

Avatar
#38 Quicksilver ballet
April 09 2013, 11:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Ogie Oilthorpe wrote:

At this point the Oilers are going to get another good first round pick. Management needs to really decide who is untouchable on this team and who isn't. For me Hall and RNH are truly untouchable.They need to deal away one of the young stars plus Whitney, Potter, Jones, and Hemsky and a few draft picks to start pluggin holes. I think the fan base deserves a bit more from Tambo than another "savior" first overall expecting to pull the team out of the basement. Start selling assets to put the effin puzzle together. Tambo can't figure out a remote, how is he going to fix the rubix cube..

Scratch Jonesy and Whitney off your list. In 9 games they can be had for free as a UFA's this summer.

Unless it's a Shea Weber type deal, the fab 5 stay bolted to the floor.

Avatar
#39 Ogie Oilthorpe
April 09 2013, 11:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Seguin and Hall (2010), Hopkins and Larsson(2011), and last summers possibility of Galchenyuk and Ryan Murray(2012). Little doubt one of these deals would've made the Oilers a stronger group going forward with a more motivated management group. Their inactivity has us headed closer to an Infinibuild than a rebuild it appears.

But.. But, we have 50 coke machines that will be ready to play on the 4th line in 5-10 years. That's progress right?

Avatar
#40 Shredder
April 09 2013, 11:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

FYI: here comes the trade speculation...hopefully Tambi is thinking about doing deals too.

As far as I'm concerned, fine, let's discuss some trades even though we're a long ways from anything happening (ie: maybe we should focus on that when we get closer to the draft). And I'd even be ok with trading a quality guy, but the last thing I want to see is Joe Thornton trade, such as Yakupov for Clarkson.

Avatar
#41 Jay
April 09 2013, 11:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Does any of it even matter? A blind dog could hear this team play and know what the holes are on this lousy team. Everyone that has ever commented on an oilers blog/article knows what the holes are on this team. We can type long winded comments, phone in to talk shows, throw the nearest object at the tv, boo the team when they show no effort, raise our pitchforks and start a chant. None of it matters. I have a feeling this team will never be that Stanley Cup contender everyone has been hoping for. Management has'nt shown any competence in building a winning team. I'm not sure they know what it takes. Just walking in the desert.

Avatar
#42 Spydyr
April 09 2013, 11:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Shredder wrote:

FYI: here comes the trade speculation...hopefully Tambi is thinking about doing deals too.

As far as I'm concerned, fine, let's discuss some trades even though we're a long ways from anything happening (ie: maybe we should focus on that when we get closer to the draft). And I'd even be ok with trading a quality guy, but the last thing I want to see is Joe Thornton trade, such as Yakupov for Clarkson.

Trade speculation is easy.

Trade anyone that cannot help the team in 3-5 years.

Keep anybody that can.

Add size and tenacity subtract a couple small skilled players. Hemsky Gagner. Now you are going to say Gagner can help the team in 3-5 years.Sure, but there are 4 players in his role better than him. The team needs some balls.

Add two more NHL defensmen and a young goalie to push Dubby.

See Tambo, It is not so hard.

Avatar
#43 Gordoil
April 09 2013, 11:44AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Don't forget kids line is not being protected from other teams best players, as was the case last season.

Avatar
#44 Will
April 09 2013, 11:44AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Does anyone have any thoughts as to why this team is capable of kicking the crap out of the league's best teams one night, but can't put it together the next?

I'm sure it's a combination of things, but to my eye we either win with our special teams, or other teams get drawn into a little bit of river hockey for enough of the game where we can win. That's why disciplined puck possession teams like Detroit are the bane of Oiler existence.

It seems like we have a hard time getting the puck back, especially when we can't win face-offs.

Avatar
#45 Ducey
April 09 2013, 11:48AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Ogie Oilthorpe wrote:

At this point the Oilers are going to get another good first round pick. Management needs to really decide who is untouchable on this team and who isn't. For me Hall and RNH are truly untouchable.They need to deal away one of the young stars plus Whitney, Potter, Jones, and Hemsky and a few draft picks to start pluggin holes. I think the fan base deserves a bit more from Tambo than another "savior" first overall expecting to pull the team out of the basement. Start selling assets to put the effin puzzle together. Tambo can't figure out a remote, how is he going to fix the rubix cube..

How did that work for the Avs?

They traded Shattenkirk and Stewart for a "#1" defenseman in Erik Johnson, and Mclement. They have not been the same since. It has set back their rebuild years.

People need to have some patience. You don't trade young players just so you can try and make the playoffs.

Avatar
#46 Spydyr
April 09 2013, 11:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Will wrote:

Does anyone have any thoughts as to why this team is capable of kicking the crap out of the league's best teams one night, but can't put it together the next?

I'm sure it's a combination of things, but to my eye we either win with our special teams, or other teams get drawn into a little bit of river hockey for enough of the game where we can win. That's why disciplined puck possession teams like Detroit are the bane of Oiler existence.

It seems like we have a hard time getting the puck back, especially when we can't win face-offs.

Perhaps the other team sees the free space on their bingo card and play just well enough to win. Sometimes it backfires and they lose.

Avatar
#47 Rama Lama
April 09 2013, 11:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Mike Krushelnyski

Any monkey (lobotomy included) could have selected the proper first overall pick.......hell the pundits do that for you.

Avatar
#48 Will
April 09 2013, 11:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I also can't blame management for doing so little at the deadline. I imagine they tried to offload players for picks but weren't getting what they wanted. It is well reported we just missed out on Bishop, but given what Tampa gave away, that is understandable.

Until this team stops getting pushed off the puck, and starts winning some second line face offs, I will forever scream to trade Hemsky and Gagner. One needs to go for a centre that gets less points but is larger, can win draws, cycle down low, and retrieve the puck along the boards (*cough Cotuier), and one needs to be packaged up for something that can help us on the blue line.

Our bottom six could use a tweak, and we need a good back-up. If the best guy for that job is Habby, so be it, just as long as that's really the best guy available.

Avatar
#49 Rama Lama
April 09 2013, 11:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Will wrote:

Does anyone have any thoughts as to why this team is capable of kicking the crap out of the league's best teams one night, but can't put it together the next?

I'm sure it's a combination of things, but to my eye we either win with our special teams, or other teams get drawn into a little bit of river hockey for enough of the game where we can win. That's why disciplined puck possession teams like Detroit are the bane of Oiler existence.

It seems like we have a hard time getting the puck back, especially when we can't win face-offs.

I think it has to do with the quality of the motivational speeches at the start of the game.

Show Chris Farley and the Oil win.

RK delivers and the Oil lose.

Avatar
#50 Rama Lama
April 09 2013, 11:52AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Will wrote:

Does anyone have any thoughts as to why this team is capable of kicking the crap out of the league's best teams one night, but can't put it together the next?

I'm sure it's a combination of things, but to my eye we either win with our special teams, or other teams get drawn into a little bit of river hockey for enough of the game where we can win. That's why disciplined puck possession teams like Detroit are the bane of Oiler existence.

It seems like we have a hard time getting the puck back, especially when we can't win face-offs.

I think it has to do with the quality of the motivational speeches at the start of the game.

Show Chris Farley and the Oil win.

RK delivers and the Oil lose.

Comments are closed for this article.