2013 DRAFT TAKES: POSSIBLE OILERS

Lowetide
May 02 2013 09:35PM

There's a chance that the "top level" forwards will be gone by the time Stu MacGregor and the Edmonton Oilers step to the podium at the 2013 draft. If so, where do they go? Reach for a lesser forward? Pick a defenseman (like Darnell Nurse, in video)? Trade down?

In his time away from the Oilers, Craig MacTavish no doubt saw a few interesting things he'll bring to the procurement table this summer for the Oilers. A recent Terry Jones article contained a couple of MacT quotes that got me thinking:

  • MacT: “We’re definitely going to look at doing something with that pick. I think we’d be very receptive to moving back and picking up another pick potentially."
  • More MacT: “It’s a very deep draft in my mind. There are tons of players out there who excite me. Or possibly we could pick up somebody that could help us immediately and another pick.”

The Oilers have moved up in the draft (dealt two picks to move up for Riley Nash) and moved down (dealt the Zack Parise pick for Pouliot and Jacques) with results that could be described as "infamous" and remain understated; however, with the club already owning their jacks and kings, perhaps this plan allows them to improve depth.

Personally, the only way I can see it happening is if the following players come off the board 1-6:

  1. Seth Jones
  2. Nathan MacKinnon
  3. Jonathan Drouin
  4. Slava Barkov
  5. Sean Monahan
  6. Elias Lindholm

Should that happen, Edmonton would be left with an abundance of blue (Nurse, Risto Ristolainen, Nikita Zadorov) but perhaps a bit of a gap between those six forwards and the next level (Nichushkin, who may fall due to contract and performance concerns, Hunter Shinkaruk, Max Domi, Curtis Lazar).

THE SOLUTION?

Just thinking out loud, but maybe you deal #7 overall to Winnipeg for #13 and #43. If Curtis Lazar (above) is still there, the Oilers continue the Oil King caravan of tough, physical players. The club would have no need to push him into immediate action, rather allowing him to mature in the WHL--something that paid dividends with Jordan Eberle.

AND WITH THE EXTRA PICK?

The Oilers received good value (so far) from the BCJHL last season when selecting Jujhar Khaira from the Prince George Spruce Kings. He had a fine season at Michigan Tech and is one of the best 'forwards with size' among the organization's prospects.

Although it might be awkward, the Oilers could use that second round selection on Adam Tambellini of the Surrey Eagles. He's on his way to North Dakota (NCAA), so there's no worry about him needing to be signed any time soon. He's also an emerging power forward--this article has him currently at 6.02, 205--and has a scorer's touch.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

History tells us selecting defensemen at the top of the draft rarely results in true value. If the Oilers don't feel it's wise to use the 7th overall pick on a defender, perhaps trading down is the right call.

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on Team 1260.
Avatar
#1 Taylor Gang
May 02 2013, 09:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

LOL WHAT A BABE LT

Avatar
#2 Toro
May 02 2013, 09:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

I don't get why everyone loves Lazar so much, he isn't tough at all total opposite if you ask me, and I could totally see the oilers doing something stupid and trading the 7 pick for more drafts picks , which is exactly the opposite of what they should do , if you don't mind developing the player we draft why not draft Nichushkin, he's contracted to the KHL for 2 years and he's a big power forward we crave and has been rated as high as the 2nd best player at one point, of course there is the Russian factor but with a superstar Russian in Yakupov here I'm sure he would come play here. But if we're gonna trade the pick unless its too move up in the draft it better be got an established player that helps now and can play in the future.

Avatar
#3 Jasmine
May 02 2013, 09:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Toro

Why is there so much hate for Curtis Lazar. In the Draft Preview in THN, Lazar is ranked at #9. Wouldn't much of a reach if Oilers took him at #7.

Avatar
#4 Steve
May 02 2013, 09:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I can't see Carolina taking another center at #5 I see a winger or a Dman

Avatar
#5 OilerLand
May 02 2013, 09:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Monahan, Nichushkin, Nurse.

If none of those players are left then that means some other great player fell to 7.

You take the pick.always take the pick. Forget trading it, the idea gives me chills.

I want either Monahan or the Russian.

Avatar
#6 Walter Sobchak
May 02 2013, 09:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Has trading down ever worked for the Oilers?

This trading back to get something two years down the road is complete BS.

The Oilers needs dictate they be aggressive and move up, not back.

If three elite two way centers don't get the Oilers excited knowing that one of your weakest spots is center then Mac-T has sh!t for brains.

The weakest spot is Defense followed really close by center.

They need to fix that this year, you can talk about trading back next year when the draft is not as deep.

I cant bare to watch a Malkin or a Getzlaf walk because the GM figured another 6'0 190 lbs RW was just what the Oilers needed.

Avatar
#7 Taylor Gang
May 02 2013, 09:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

If people truly want a very good defenseman without trading one of the kids, the time is now.

Gagner (who had a career year) + 7th overall pick. That package alone could get you a VERY good defenseman.

Avatar
#8 Walter Sobchak
May 02 2013, 10:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Jasmine wrote:

Why is there so much hate for Curtis Lazar. In the Draft Preview in THN, Lazar is ranked at #9. Wouldn't much of a reach if Oilers took him at #7.

He plays on a stacked team, where he is not even close to being there top player, as apposed to say a Monahan who was clearly the best player on a terrible team.

Or Barkov who is 17 and is one of the best players playing against men.

As for need, the Oilers don't need another small RW player.

The fact most credible scouting report has Lazar around 15-25 I guess that would be why too.

Avatar
#9 admiralmark
May 02 2013, 10:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Toro wrote:

I don't get why everyone loves Lazar so much, he isn't tough at all total opposite if you ask me, and I could totally see the oilers doing something stupid and trading the 7 pick for more drafts picks , which is exactly the opposite of what they should do , if you don't mind developing the player we draft why not draft Nichushkin, he's contracted to the KHL for 2 years and he's a big power forward we crave and has been rated as high as the 2nd best player at one point, of course there is the Russian factor but with a superstar Russian in Yakupov here I'm sure he would come play here. But if we're gonna trade the pick unless its too move up in the draft it better be got an established player that helps now and can play in the future.

Totally agree if Nichushkin is there at #7 and Monahan's gone they should take him. Nichushkin could very well turn out to be the best player in this draft down the road.

Avatar
#10 Jeffff
May 02 2013, 10:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I see it like this today.

Col – Jones

FL – MacKinnon

TB- Drouin/Barkov

Nash- Drouin/Barkov

Car- Nichushkin/Nurse

Cal- Monahan/Nichushkin/Lindholm

Edm- Monahan/Nichushkin//Lindholm/Nurse

Avatar
#11 Walter Sobchak
May 02 2013, 10:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Steve wrote:

I can't see Carolina taking another center at #5 I see a winger or a Dman

I can see the Hurricanes and the Predators taking wingers or defensive players as well.

I also see them as a willing trading partner to flip picks.

I can see if MacKinnon is off the board the Predators may take a winger or defense.

The Problem is Calgary.

Avatar
#12 Taylor Gang
May 02 2013, 10:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
admiralmark wrote:

Totally agree if Nichushkin is there at #7 and Monahan's gone they should take him. Nichushkin could very well turn out to be the best player in this draft down the road.

Best in the draft? Let's not get ahead of ourselves...

Avatar
#13 admiralmark
May 02 2013, 10:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Taylor Gang wrote:

Best in the draft? Let's not get ahead of ourselves...

I said could be.. and he very well could be. The potential is there for this player. My point is if not for the Russian Factor he would not be there at # 7. Lets put it that way.

Avatar
#14 admiralmark
May 02 2013, 10:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
admiralmark wrote:

I said could be.. and he very well could be. The potential is there for this player. My point is if not for the Russian Factor he would not be there at # 7. Lets put it that way.

Lets put it this way.. If not for the Russian Factor he would not be there at #7.

Avatar
#15 TeddyTurnbuckle
May 02 2013, 10:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I don't think they should trade down. No chance they they trade up even though I'd give up MPS or Gagner and # 7pick to get Mckinnon. Move Hall to Center if its Gagner going. Otherwise I would be happy drafting Monahan, Big Russian or Nurse. If they trade the pick they better get something great and not a watered down group of selections. A #7 pick has potential to play in 2 years while 2 late 1st rounders probably are 3 years away.

Avatar
#16 Naky
May 02 2013, 10:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

The Oilers definitely have the Yakupov factor when it comes to Nichushkin. For those who view the KHL contract as a negative, try possibly to look at it this way - he'll be developing further in one of the top men's leagues in the world and he'll be making good enough money to soothe any money concerns he may be having in setting up his family, so leaving for that entry level contract that could turn into AHL money if he isn't ready (shouldn't) be as big a concern for him by then is it wouldn't be for any other player without that opportunity. By then, the Yak will be older, wiser in the ways of the NHL, and far more comfortable in North America to play as an excellent example/mentor for him too.

I suppose the only negative is that he will not be a player we can use right now - but then, there's no guarantee that any other player picked at 7th would be too. Kadri took a while and he was picked in that range. Worked out in the end though!

Avatar
#17 TeddyTurnbuckle
May 02 2013, 10:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Calgary might be stupid enough to trade their pick for an accelerated rebuild roster player.

Avatar
#18 Eric K
May 02 2013, 10:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Naky wrote:

The Oilers definitely have the Yakupov factor when it comes to Nichushkin. For those who view the KHL contract as a negative, try possibly to look at it this way - he'll be developing further in one of the top men's leagues in the world and he'll be making good enough money to soothe any money concerns he may be having in setting up his family, so leaving for that entry level contract that could turn into AHL money if he isn't ready (shouldn't) be as big a concern for him by then is it wouldn't be for any other player without that opportunity. By then, the Yak will be older, wiser in the ways of the NHL, and far more comfortable in North America to play as an excellent example/mentor for him too.

I suppose the only negative is that he will not be a player we can use right now - but then, there's no guarantee that any other player picked at 7th would be too. Kadri took a while and he was picked in that range. Worked out in the end though!

Carolina has Semin

Avatar
#19 Quicksilver ballet
May 02 2013, 10:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

It doesn't take a jeanyus to find the reason why we're in this mess. It's the very poor drafting outside of the first round these last 5 yrs. If someone else isn't doing scoutings homework for them (lotto BPA) they fall short virtually everytime.

If there's one thing we've learned about Stu MacGregor the last five years. Magnificent couldn't be further from the truth. How much longer can the Oilers continue to let these bozos run amateur scouting?

Watch these idiots trade that 7th for more fools gold.

Avatar
#20 Walter Sobchak
May 02 2013, 10:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
TeddyTurnbuckle wrote:

I don't think they should trade down. No chance they they trade up even though I'd give up MPS or Gagner and # 7pick to get Mckinnon. Move Hall to Center if its Gagner going. Otherwise I would be happy drafting Monahan, Big Russian or Nurse. If they trade the pick they better get something great and not a watered down group of selections. A #7 pick has potential to play in 2 years while 2 late 1st rounders probably are 3 years away.

People keep talking like Hall will just simply slide into the center position, the hardest position so effortlessly.

Stop! Hall himself as said no! doesn't want to, admitted it will be tough! You have another two years to wait before he learns a new position!

Avatar
#21 Unhealthy scratch
May 02 2013, 10:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Two things we can't know today - who will be available at 7, and what others will offer for that pick.

Would I do #7 + Gagner for OEL? In a heartbeat. Would Phoenix? Doubtful, but it is worth a shot.

How about #7 + Hemsky for Tyutin? Yep. Would CBJ? They already have 3 first round picks. But maybe they want to trade two other first rounders for a roster player who could help them next season. They'd still end up with two first rounders and two roster players, while giving up one roster player and getting a better top pick.

There are so many moving parts to this, there is no sense doing anything but throwing ideas out there.

Avatar
#22 striker777
May 02 2013, 10:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Nichushkin is the best forward in this year's draft. We should feel blessed he has a current KHL contract. This should scare of other teams and the best power forward could fall to Oilers. Malkin stayed in KHL after being drafted and he turned out pretty well. I hope MacT doesn't move down. That's just stupid, when you have such a high pick.

Avatar
#23 Taylor Gang
May 02 2013, 10:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Unhealthy scratch wrote:

Two things we can't know today - who will be available at 7, and what others will offer for that pick.

Would I do #7 + Gagner for OEL? In a heartbeat. Would Phoenix? Doubtful, but it is worth a shot.

How about #7 + Hemsky for Tyutin? Yep. Would CBJ? They already have 3 first round picks. But maybe they want to trade two other first rounders for a roster player who could help them next season. They'd still end up with two first rounders and two roster players, while giving up one roster player and getting a better top pick.

There are so many moving parts to this, there is no sense doing anything but throwing ideas out there.

OEL would be a fair price for Gags and the #7. Phoenix has arguably one of the best defensive cores in the league. That said, it's probably more likely that they trade Yandle, but I'm okay with that. I'm a big fan of Yandle.

Avatar
#24 Rocknrolla
May 02 2013, 10:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

At least we can trust the oilers organization and the rookie GM to make the right decision on draft day.....man I hope they don't f&@$ this up.

Trading down never works...trade for an IMPACT player or take the great pick.

If we end up with a Monaghan, who looks like a great player in 2 years when we are making a run, great...if we trade and get an impact power forward or top 2 D great....

But a FAIL would be trade down for 2 picks and choose another DUD at 18, and get another 2nd round Hail Mary.

Hopefully MacT can learn from our past mistakes with draft picks.

Avatar
#25 misfit
May 02 2013, 10:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Walter Sobchak wrote:

Has trading down ever worked for the Oilers?

This trading back to get something two years down the road is complete BS.

The Oilers needs dictate they be aggressive and move up, not back.

If three elite two way centers don't get the Oilers excited knowing that one of your weakest spots is center then Mac-T has sh!t for brains.

The weakest spot is Defense followed really close by center.

They need to fix that this year, you can talk about trading back next year when the draft is not as deep.

I cant bare to watch a Malkin or a Getzlaf walk because the GM figured another 6'0 190 lbs RW was just what the Oilers needed.

Has a draft day trade involving 1st rounders ever worked in favour of the team trading down?

Maybe a handfull of times, and I'd say most examples involved at least one goaltender (aka, the wildcards of the draft).

Avatar
#26 Greg
May 02 2013, 10:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Funny how fans know exactly how these players will turn out. They know the worth of other players on different teams. We all read articles and form opinions based on our biases.

Avatar
#27 Citizen David
May 02 2013, 10:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I don't understand the Lazar hate. Is he as good as Monahan? No. But I would love for the oilers to get him. He brings everything MacT was talking about - speed (Monahan's weakness), depth scoring, physical hardworking passion

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/sports/hockey/edmonton-oilers/MacKinnon+Smiling+Edmonton+Kings+centre/8318727/story.html

and he's not a player going in the twenties. Bob Mackenzie's final survey of scouts had Lazar just outside the top ten.

http://www.tsn.ca/draftcentre/story/?id=422034

Avatar
#28 Citizen David
May 02 2013, 10:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I like the trade down option. Gets us an extra piece and there are some good players availiable later. Kerby Rychel is exactly what the Oilers are missing, hits everything, fights, two seasons ago: GP 68 G 41 A 33 P 74 this season: GP 68 G 40 A 47 P 87.

Avatar
#29 Quicksilver ballet
May 02 2013, 10:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Oliver Ekman-Larsson, is he another one of those soft types that would need someone to protect him as well?

Avatar
#30 Klima's Mullet
May 02 2013, 10:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Gotta think the Flames are taking Monahan...Canes like Nurse according to the TSN guys. Lindholm will be an Oiler.

Avatar
#31 oilers2k14
May 02 2013, 11:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

I never understood trading out of a top ten pick, most of the time your giving up the best player in the deal if you do that..especially in this years draft. An extra second round pick doesnt justify trading down, unless its only a spot or two.

Avatar
#32 jeffff
May 02 2013, 11:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Oliver Ekman-Larsson, is he another one of those soft types that would need someone to protect him as well?

That is what they use to say about Nicklas Lidstrom . He turned out okay

Avatar
#33 Citizen David
May 02 2013, 11:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Players that will be availiable in the Draft I'd be pleased to be Oilers, Defensemen: Nurse, Ristolainen, Zadorov, Pulock, Mueller. Forwards: Lazar, Rychel, Horvat, Domi, Mantha, Bailey. Goalies: Comrie, Jarry.

Avatar
#34 Quicksilver ballet
May 02 2013, 11:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
jeffff wrote:

That is what they use to say about Nicklas Lidstrom . He turned out okay

The Oilers already have Justin Schultz, he doesn't project to be overly physical. Petry,Smid,Nick Schultz, all far too easy to play against already.

Avatar
#35 Romanus
May 02 2013, 11:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Jasmine wrote:

Why is there so much hate for Curtis Lazar. In the Draft Preview in THN, Lazar is ranked at #9. Wouldn't much of a reach if Oilers took him at #7.

It's because of the hate for Lowe and because if he gets drafted, the fans will just drive him out of town and others won't sign here. If it was Sather he would be drafted and nobody would complain. :)

Avatar
#36 oilers4
May 02 2013, 11:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

If Barkov and Monahan are off the board at #7, then Nurse might just be what the doctor ordered! He says he models his play after some guy named Pronger . . . sounds OK to me.

As for taking a defenseman so high in the draft I seem to remember a guy named Coffey going at #6. He did just fine as I recall.

Avatar
#37 Walter Sobchak
May 02 2013, 11:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Citizen David wrote:

I like the trade down option. Gets us an extra piece and there are some good players availiable later. Kerby Rychel is exactly what the Oilers are missing, hits everything, fights, two seasons ago: GP 68 G 41 A 33 P 74 this season: GP 68 G 40 A 47 P 87.

David, This is where I totally agree with you, Kerby Rychel IS what the Oilers need.

Lazar, I get to watch a lot because of my season tickets with both the Oilers and Kings.

Lazar is another same type player the Oilers already have.

Kerby plays LW a need for the Oilers, Lazar doesnt fit into anything the Oilers need, he's a wasted pick IMO.

Trade Hemsky for another pick in the 15-25 range and both Rychel and Lazar will still be there.

Avatar
#38 dougtheslug
May 02 2013, 11:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
striker777 wrote:

Nichushkin is the best forward in this year's draft. We should feel blessed he has a current KHL contract. This should scare of other teams and the best power forward could fall to Oilers. Malkin stayed in KHL after being drafted and he turned out pretty well. I hope MacT doesn't move down. That's just stupid, when you have such a high pick.

http://youtu.be/wp4T8lBBMPw

I'm coming around to this opinion - even though Nichushkin has stated he will honour his contact in the KHL which runs through to 2015. Why not acquire the best available asset? The "depth" of this draft refers to the sure things in the top 10. After that, things drop off pretty quick, and the draft truly becomes a "lottery". Moscow Dynamo just payed a US$10,000,000 transfer fee to Traktor Chelyabinsk for this guy - thats a lotta dough from people that know him a whole lot better than North Americans. He does say that he is coming to the NHL Combine, and will stay in North America to train this summer, but intends to follow the trajectory of Tarasenko in St. Louis. Still, if he is available, I say put him in the bank, and let him appreciate in value.

Avatar
#39 copperblue
May 03 2013, 12:05AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Jasmine

hello i been looking for THN draft preview magazine...is it out at the newstands at the moment ? when did you get yours ? hope i can still get one Thanks

Avatar
#40 dougtheslug
May 03 2013, 12:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Romanus wrote:

It's because of the hate for Lowe and because if he gets drafted, the fans will just drive him out of town and others won't sign here. If it was Sather he would be drafted and nobody would complain. :)

Isn't someone bashing someone else as well?

Avatar
#41 clyde
May 03 2013, 12:08AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
TeddyTurnbuckle wrote:

Calgary might be stupid enough to trade their pick for an accelerated rebuild roster player.

You may be right. Talk out East is that if Calgary's top choice is gone, Nurse is still there and they feel they can get Lindholme, Monahan, Routselainen or Zadorov at 11, they will trade with the Flyers. Calgary would take a salary dump, the 11 and Couturier and the Flyerds would draft Nurse and then use some cap flexibility to go after a goalie.

Avatar
#42 clyde
May 03 2013, 12:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Walter Sobchak wrote:

David, This is where I totally agree with you, Kerby Rychel IS what the Oilers need.

Lazar, I get to watch a lot because of my season tickets with both the Oilers and Kings.

Lazar is another same type player the Oilers already have.

Kerby plays LW a need for the Oilers, Lazar doesnt fit into anything the Oilers need, he's a wasted pick IMO.

Trade Hemsky for another pick in the 15-25 range and both Rychel and Lazar will still be there.

Hemsky won't get you anywhere near that.

Avatar
#43 Oilcan
May 03 2013, 12:38AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

What would it take to get Kulikov out of Florida.

Avatar
#44 Oilcan
May 03 2013, 12:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I wouldnt mind seeing Mac T get creative and send Hemsky to Boston (Play with Kreiji) and retain 3 mill of his contract for Boychuk and a prospect.

I think Hemsky at 2 million would be very attractive to Boston who could use a PP specialist and dynamic RW.

The 3 million wouldnt hurt edmonton too much next year and then they add an NHL defenseman.

Avatar
#45 clyde
May 03 2013, 12:46AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Oilcan wrote:

What would it take to get Kulikov out of Florida.

A very highly touted Calle Jarncrok, Xavier Oulette and a 2nd from Detroit wasn't enough at the deadline. The Wings may have even upgraded to a 1st.

Avatar
#46 clyde
May 03 2013, 12:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Oilcan wrote:

I wouldnt mind seeing Mac T get creative and send Hemsky to Boston (Play with Kreiji) and retain 3 mill of his contract for Boychuk and a prospect.

I think Hemsky at 2 million would be very attractive to Boston who could use a PP specialist and dynamic RW.

The 3 million wouldnt hurt edmonton too much next year and then they add an NHL defenseman.

Doesn't fit as a Bruin. They will resign Horton anyway. Boychuk is a good def to go after though.

Avatar
#47 Geoff
May 03 2013, 01:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

If the oilers get nishkunin or nurse I'd be a VERY happy camper =D

Avatar
#48 OF17
May 03 2013, 01:45AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
clyde wrote:

Doesn't fit as a Bruin. They will resign Horton anyway. Boychuk is a good def to go after though.

I think Hemsky could be a great fit there, and if you're retaining $2-3 million in the deal, trading for Hemsky and re-signing Horton wouldn't be mutually exclusive for Boston.

Lucic - Krejci - Hemsky Marchand - Bergeron - Seguin xxx - Kelly - Horton Paille - Campbell - Thornton

That's assuming that Peverley gets traded, and hopefully to us, for cap reasons.

Avatar
#49 Reg Dunlop
May 03 2013, 02:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Oilers loading up on former oilkings has been tried, unsuccessfully, before. Anyone old enough to remember the McAneeleys and Bob Falkenberg? Kerry Ketter? Yikes were they awful. Confining one's search for talent to the most familiar source is a recipe for failure. But, I can hear voices saying 'Moroz and Gernat were part of the western championship team and Lazar played in the Mem cup'. So did Bob and Ted, and Ron Anderson, Doug Barrie, Ross Perkins, Smokey McLeod and a bunch of other guys that Bill Hunter was buddies with. The oiler tradition of the 'old boys club', dating back to 1972 and still going strong, has to end.

I guess what I am getting at in a round about way is that trading down in the draft to take Lazar in addition to an extra 2nd rounder is the second worst scenario; the worst is drafting Lazar 7th overall. Take the BPA (Monahan or Lindholm).

Avatar
#50 Walter Sobchak
May 03 2013, 03:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Reg Dunlop wrote:

Oilers loading up on former oilkings has been tried, unsuccessfully, before. Anyone old enough to remember the McAneeleys and Bob Falkenberg? Kerry Ketter? Yikes were they awful. Confining one's search for talent to the most familiar source is a recipe for failure. But, I can hear voices saying 'Moroz and Gernat were part of the western championship team and Lazar played in the Mem cup'. So did Bob and Ted, and Ron Anderson, Doug Barrie, Ross Perkins, Smokey McLeod and a bunch of other guys that Bill Hunter was buddies with. The oiler tradition of the 'old boys club', dating back to 1972 and still going strong, has to end.

I guess what I am getting at in a round about way is that trading down in the draft to take Lazar in addition to an extra 2nd rounder is the second worst scenario; the worst is drafting Lazar 7th overall. Take the BPA (Monahan or Lindholm).

This is well said! Props.

Comments are closed for this article.