Former NHL GM: “I don’t know if they can get [a second round pick] for Hemsky”

Jonathan Willis
May 20 2013 09:48AM

Craig Button, the one-time general manager of the Calgary Flames, does not believe Ales Hemsky has much in the way of trade value. Barely any trade value at all, in point of fact.

The Quote

Here’s Button, as quoted by the Edmonton Journal’s Jim Matheson:

I don’t think there’s a market for him … I shouldn’t say there’s no market. But the salary cap is coming down to $64.3 million. He makes $5 million for one more year. Would the Oilers pick up half of that to trade him, 50-50 (with another team)? That would still free up $2.5 million in cap space for the Oilers. I don’t know if they can get something tangible in return for Hemsky. Andrew Cogliano got the Oilers a second-round draft (pick). I don’t know if they can get that for Hemsky.

Uh-huh

So, in Button’s scenario, the Oilers eat half of Hemsky’s salary and deal him to a team that will pay $2.5 million per season, and they can’t land a second-round draft pick?

For starters: if the Oilers somehow couldn’t get a second-round pick for a guy making $2.5 million who scores like Hemsky, than they may as well fire the general manager now because he’s hopeless. This link has a list of active players with similar scoring rates to Hemsky over the last five seasons (Hemsky, by the way, ranks 59th among NHL forwards over the last five years in points-per-game which is well above the pace of most second-line forwards).

It’s not a great list, but it really isn’t a bad one either. Joffrey Lupul was dealt in 2011 as part of a package for Francois Beauchemin; the Maple Leafs liked him enough to sign him to a five year extension worth more than $5 million and including a limited no-trade clause. Martin Erat was considered enough of a return for the Capitals to give up star prospect Filip Forsberg. There are other examples, too; Jaromir Jagr earned more of a return as a rental player at the deadline than Button is suggesting Hemsky would fetch at half his salary and for a full year.

Hemsky isn’t going to fetch a massive return – he likely won’t bring in a top-pairing defenceman or a power forward for the second line – but it’s lunacy to think he can’t fetch a second-round draft pick at a $2.5 million cap hit.

Recently around the Nation Network

There has been a lot of talk in Edmonton about the possibility of drafting Sean Monahan, but one of the problems for such aspirations is that the Calgary Flames pick before the Oilers, and he's certainly a potential fit for that club as well. In Flames first round target: Sean Monahan, Kent Wilson looks at the numbers and the scouting reports; here's part of what he had to say:

In some ways, Monahan's scouting reports sounds a lot like recent CHL graduates Gabriel Landeskog and Sean Courturier, both of whom were considered more or less "NHL ready" right out of the draft because of their size and the completeness of their games. Neither guy has set the world on fire offensively in the NHL at this point, but both are already playing tough competition and surviving/thriving in the show as kids.

 Click the link above to read the whole piece, or feel free check out some recent pieces here at Oilers Nation:

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 Romulus' Apotheosis
May 20 2013, 09:59AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
8
props

There's a reason button doesn't have a GM spot anymore.

Operating as a GM on the basis of idiosyncratic beliefs about players is the fastest way to ruin a hockey team.

And... Matheson has a track record of targeting Hemsky for BS reasons.

Avatar
#2 DrunkGuyTy
May 20 2013, 10:10AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
5
props

Button still wears Flames coloured glasses. Wasn't he the GM during their last playoff drought? I don't know how he even maintains a broadcasting role - he's irrelevant.

Avatar
#3 Jeffff
May 20 2013, 10:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Hemsky would have been traded years ago but he is just not worth that much to other teams.

C'mon you can't finish last so many times and second last with good players and on and on.

Outside of a few players on the Oilers most NHL teams know the Oilers have players with lipstick on.

Avatar
#4 Romulus' Apotheosis
May 20 2013, 10:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
Jeffff wrote:

Hemsky would have been traded years ago but he is just not worth that much to other teams.

C'mon you can't finish last so many times and second last with good players and on and on.

Outside of a few players on the Oilers most NHL teams know the Oilers have players with lipstick on.

LT wrote this on his blog today:

"Two deadlines ago, Derek Van Diest from the Sun told me (this was during an on air segment on the Team 1260) that the strongest offer for Hemsky was a 2nd and a 4th (and it came from Nashville)."

Avatar
#5 Smokey
May 20 2013, 10:26AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

That's why I say trade Gagner as he's got better value. Keep Hemsky cause you need the either Hemsky or Gagner. Gagner can fetch more, and I don't think team needs another 4.5-5 million dollar winger. Trading Gagner for a return, and then when Hemsky's contract is done this team should have cap flexibility moving forward. Hemsky still produces. I remember a lot of games near the end of the season where this team was dreadful without Hemsky. His value is understated, and before the injury the Oilers were in the playoff mix, and then after they tanked. Hemsky is still a dynamic player, teams still have to know when he's on the ice. I think we might be looking at being more objective if he wasn't slowed by the foot injury for a month.

I think we should be seeing some articles on buying out Shawn Horcoff, and finding replacements. Or what a return on Gagner might be.

Avatar
#6 horndog77
May 20 2013, 10:28AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I said the same thing yesterday on LTs article. Hemsky in most scenarios should fetch a earlier second rounder. So is a second round pick more valueable than Ales or saving cap space for others? May as well let him play out his contract, hopefully he plays well and they trade him at the deadline. I would like to see them trade Hemsky+7th overall+ second b pick to Nashville for their 4th overall.

Avatar
#7 Rk
May 20 2013, 10:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Teams looking for players don't say I want that Hemsky guy. They say that Magnus Paajarvi looks good.

Avatar
#8 Eddie Shore
May 20 2013, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Is this a joke?

Avatar
#9 Rama Lama
May 20 2013, 10:33AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

There are parts of Hemsky's game that every hockey fan loves.........but he is the furthest thing from a complete hockey player, and has never showed the " team play", aspect that we so desperately need.

Too much end-to-end play with the occasional finish is not enough to get anything more than a secoud round draft choice. We could have probably had Forseberg but Tamby do nothing, did nothing.

At this point I would settle for a third round draft choice for Hemsky. Bye Bye.

Avatar
#10 Jeffff
May 20 2013, 10:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
horndog77 wrote:

I said the same thing yesterday on LTs article. Hemsky in most scenarios should fetch a earlier second rounder. So is a second round pick more valueable than Ales or saving cap space for others? May as well let him play out his contract, hopefully he plays well and they trade him at the deadline. I would like to see them trade Hemsky+7th overall+ second b pick to Nashville for their 4th overall.

You know what Nashville would say to this trade.

"Hemsky+7th overall+ second b pick to Nashville for their 4th overall."

Yes we will do it on 1 condition you keep Hemsky.

Avatar
#11 ryan
May 20 2013, 11:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I like hemsky and I think he would be a good option moving forward. I think you use this as leverage for his next contract and you give him some term for value. I think if you have hemsky at a bargain contract its worth it and it would be nice to have that depth on the 3rd line and he is a perfect guy to fill in on the top 6 if we have injuries.

Avatar
#12 Czar
May 20 2013, 11:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

Isn't this the same guy who let St.Louis go for nothing?

Avatar
#13 geoff
May 20 2013, 11:25AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

Hemsky just needs a better team to be a part of.

Avatar
#14 non descript
May 20 2013, 11:28AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

use ales as a piece in a deal for an established (good) bottom six forward.

Avatar
#15 Racki
May 20 2013, 11:30AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Hemsky might be higher up if you look at the last 5 years, but other GMs are really going to scrutinize the last two and focus on how he's barely mustered any offense in those two. And do GMs want guys who miss a lot of hockey each year?

2008-09 10 games

2009-10 60 games

2010-11 35 games

2011-12 13 games

2012-13 10 games

So, 128 games down the toilet in the last 5 seasons, or an overage of 26 per season.. of course 1 of those seasons accounted for half, another accounted for about a quarter... but I think a similar logic is being applied when figuring his points per game pace when only one of those good seasons was based over a reasonable number of games.

Anyways, I'm not trying to put Hemsky down and say he has no value to us, but personally I don't think Button is out of line by thinking it'd be a miracle to get a 2nd rounder. I'm sure he'd get a little more than that. But that quote about "2 deadlines ago" (where he'd only fetch a 2nd + 4th) should tell you his value now when the last two seasons since then he's been on a significant downward trend.

I will actually admit that I don't really want Hemsky here any more, but I try to be objective when it comes to putting a value on a player, and I just find Hemsky a really tough sell to other teams. We aren't going to get anywhere near full value for him even if most of us know he's worth more than that. So on that note, maybe those suggesting to trade Gagner over Hemmer are right. MacT has his work cut out..

Avatar
#16 bwar
May 20 2013, 11:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

If Calgary managed to dump Bouwmeisters 6.7 mil with decent return I would like to think that Edmonton would be able to get decent value from Hemsky at 5.

Avatar
#17 Tim S
May 20 2013, 11:34AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

If no one is willing to trade an asset for Hemsky it is time to start talking extension. See if he is interested in a "hometown" discount to stay long term. He could transition to a 3rd line scoring threat, with the ability to run a 2nd PP unit.

Avatar
#18 geno
May 20 2013, 11:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Hemsky is a sublime talent. There's no arguing that. I just don't know if there's a market for aging wingers-especially ones with large injury histories.

I hope they send Hemsky east and watch him light up the scoresheet

Avatar
#19 Taylor Gang
May 20 2013, 11:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
bwar wrote:

If Calgary managed to dump Bouwmeisters 6.7 mil with decent return I would like to think that Edmonton would be able to get decent value from Hemsky at 5.

While the talent is both there for them, the reason why JBo got good value is because he is one of the most durable players in the league. Hemsky meanwhile, is one of the most injury prone players in the league. This is the reason why nobody really wants him is because they don't know how many games they'll get out of him.

Avatar
#20 Taylor Gang
May 20 2013, 11:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

Does anyone else just want to see Hemsky get sent to a contender and excel? He doesn't deserve the flack he gets.

Avatar
#21 Milt
May 20 2013, 11:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props
Taylor Gang wrote:

Does anyone else just want to see Hemsky get sent to a contender and excel? He doesn't deserve the flack he gets.

No, I want Kevin Lowe fired for his record.

Avatar
#22 Quicksilver ballet
May 20 2013, 11:53AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Hemsky marches to the beat of his own drummer. He is treated a little differently than most of his teammates. His work ethic and overall indifferent attitude has spread throughout this whole hockey club. He's just one of a few guys on this team that are willing to tolerate this Edmonton situation for the sake of a paycheque.

These guys have set the bar far too low here for a lot of years, while management stood behind them, paying them, and parading them like they were amongst the leagues elite. Hockey fans in Edmonton can't be expected to fix dumb, but why is the only option, to support SHIP like this?

Avatar
#23 Fresh Mess
May 20 2013, 11:55AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

It is comical how delusional Oiler fans are regarding Hemsky's worth around the league.

He is not worth much because he is a badly overpaid, fragile under achiever.

Avatar
#24 Fresh Mess
May 20 2013, 12:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
non descript wrote:

use ales as a piece in a deal for an established (good) bottom six forward.

I completely agree. That is how I see his trading valu too.

Trade him for a big, mean, 25 year old who can win a face off and centre the third or fourth line.

Avatar
#25 seanjohn
May 20 2013, 12:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Rishaug was saying he had 'heard' that Tambo had an offer for Hemsky that involved Erat coming to Edmonton, but, as usual, Tambo couldn't bring himself to pull the trigger. Don't know what else was involved, but on the surface, it was probably a mistake.

Avatar
#26 Sean
May 20 2013, 12:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Trade Hemsky and the 7th pick and 52nd pick to Nashville for the 4th pick in the 2013 draft.

Avatar
#27 Quicksilver ballet
May 20 2013, 12:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
seanjohn wrote:

Rishaug was saying he had 'heard' that Tambo had an offer for Hemsky that involved Erat coming to Edmonton, but, as usual, Tambo couldn't bring himself to pull the trigger. Don't know what else was involved, but on the surface, it was probably a mistake.

This is all just part of this holding out for a better draft pick option management has clung to for the last 4 yrs. This losing is the best option method, is really teaching these kids that winning isn't everything/all that important.

Don't have any confidence that Lowe will be able to ever get this thing turned around. We all must see this now as we head directly into these Infinibuild years. Not even MacTavish and his MBA can fix this mess with Lowe telling him how to do his job.

Avatar
#28 Romulus' Apotheosis
May 20 2013, 12:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Racki

"Anyways, I'm not trying to put Hemsky down and say he has no value to us, but personally I don't think Button is out of line by thinking it'd be a miracle to get a 2nd rounder. I'm sure he'd get a little more than that. But that quote about "2 deadlines ago" (where he'd only fetch a 2nd + 4th) should tell you his value now when the last two seasons since then he's been on a significant downward trend."

Except he didn't just say Hemsky was worth a 2nd. He said something much, much worse.

he said, Hemsky at only 2.5M (i.e., the Oil eat half his salary and cap) is probably not worth a 2nd.

Who in their right mind would turn down that trade. Button would have 29 teams trying to be the lucky 1st caller in.

I appreciate you trying to weigh reasonable value in light of your bias (I have the same problem in the other direction)... but the deal Button suggests is all-world crazy.

Avatar
#29 Spydyr
May 20 2013, 12:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

"There has been a lot of talk in Edmonton about the possibility of drafting Sean Monahan, but one of the problems for such aspirations is that the Calgary Flames pick before the Oilers, and he's certainly a potential fit for that club as well. In Flames first round target: Sean Monahan, Kent Wilson looks at the numbers and the scouting reports; here's part of what he had to say"

Good thing the Oilers won those last two not quite so meaningless games. Some of us caught flack hoping for loses. In hindsight what would you rather have four meaningless points or Sean Monahan?

Thought so.

Avatar
#30 Reg Dunlop
May 20 2013, 12:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Hemsky marches to the beat of his own drummer. He is treated a little differently than most of his teammates. His work ethic and overall indifferent attitude has spread throughout this whole hockey club. He's just one of a few guys on this team that are willing to tolerate this Edmonton situation for the sake of a paycheque.

These guys have set the bar far too low here for a lot of years, while management stood behind them, paying them, and parading them like they were amongst the leagues elite. Hockey fans in Edmonton can't be expected to fix dumb, but why is the only option, to support SHIP like this?

Hate to say I agree. There are only 6 players on the oil roster that have any value in trade. The rest, even Sam Pollock couldn't give away. Next year does not look good but, as I'm sure the plan has been all along, when the new arena opens we will be rid of all the non-NHL-calibre player contracts. This era in oil hockey will go down in history along side the '70s Golden Seals and '80s Devils. Embarrassing and disgraceful.

Avatar
#31 Oiler Al
May 20 2013, 12:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I would blame Tabelini for many things, but maybe not so much on not moving Hemsky. I think Mr. Lowe had a big say on this. In fact there was believe that Lowe himself sealed the 2 year, $ 5 million extension with Hemsky. The buck stops at his desk, so if Tamb. brought a deal that didnt include Malkin, then Lowe would not approve it.

The only hope of getting a return on Hemsky is packaging him with other components to make a deal. Or buy him and Horcoff, out of their contracts and open up some serious money.

Avatar
#32 madjam
May 20 2013, 12:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Button not the sharpest knife in the drawer , nor a Hemsky fan - Eastern bias no doubt. Hemsky worth at least an middle to upper first round pick , and has only 1 year left on contract -which will become a plus .

Avatar
#33 geno
May 20 2013, 12:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
Spydyr wrote:

"There has been a lot of talk in Edmonton about the possibility of drafting Sean Monahan, but one of the problems for such aspirations is that the Calgary Flames pick before the Oilers, and he's certainly a potential fit for that club as well. In Flames first round target: Sean Monahan, Kent Wilson looks at the numbers and the scouting reports; here's part of what he had to say"

Good thing the Oilers won those last two not quite so meaningless games. Some of us caught flack hoping for loses. In hindsight what would you rather have four meaningless points or Sean Monahan?

Thought so.

I'd take placing over CGY for the first time in a decade over Sean Monahan. Also apparently like 50% of Monahan's points came from the PP. EDM's PP is good enough. 5 on 5 is a struggle

Avatar
#34 DSF
May 20 2013, 12:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Romulus' Apotheosis wrote:

"Anyways, I'm not trying to put Hemsky down and say he has no value to us, but personally I don't think Button is out of line by thinking it'd be a miracle to get a 2nd rounder. I'm sure he'd get a little more than that. But that quote about "2 deadlines ago" (where he'd only fetch a 2nd + 4th) should tell you his value now when the last two seasons since then he's been on a significant downward trend."

Except he didn't just say Hemsky was worth a 2nd. He said something much, much worse.

he said, Hemsky at only 2.5M (i.e., the Oil eat half his salary and cap) is probably not worth a 2nd.

Who in their right mind would turn down that trade. Button would have 29 teams trying to be the lucky 1st caller in.

I appreciate you trying to weigh reasonable value in light of your bias (I have the same problem in the other direction)... but the deal Button suggests is all-world crazy.

No, no it isn't.

There are going to be more than a few players players bought out and will be available for nothing, nevermind a second round pick.

One example is David Booth, another injury prone winger who has similar stats to Hemsky since the last lockout but can't stay healthy.

It's likely the Canucks buy him out so, not only does another team not have to spend assets to acquire him, they also don't have to live with any part of his last contract.

You can bet that the market for Hemsky, even at $2.5M, is very, very small.

Avatar
#35 Spydyr
May 20 2013, 12:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
geno wrote:

I'd take placing over CGY for the first time in a decade over Sean Monahan. Also apparently like 50% of Monahan's points came from the PP. EDM's PP is good enough. 5 on 5 is a struggle

pride cometh before the fall

Avatar
#36 madjam
May 20 2013, 01:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Hemsky for Fisher straight up .

Avatar
#37 Racki
May 20 2013, 01:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Romulus' Apotheosis wrote:

"Anyways, I'm not trying to put Hemsky down and say he has no value to us, but personally I don't think Button is out of line by thinking it'd be a miracle to get a 2nd rounder. I'm sure he'd get a little more than that. But that quote about "2 deadlines ago" (where he'd only fetch a 2nd + 4th) should tell you his value now when the last two seasons since then he's been on a significant downward trend."

Except he didn't just say Hemsky was worth a 2nd. He said something much, much worse.

he said, Hemsky at only 2.5M (i.e., the Oil eat half his salary and cap) is probably not worth a 2nd.

Who in their right mind would turn down that trade. Button would have 29 teams trying to be the lucky 1st caller in.

I appreciate you trying to weigh reasonable value in light of your bias (I have the same problem in the other direction)... but the deal Button suggests is all-world crazy.

Damn it.. my reply just got eaten.

Anyways, long story short....

I interpreted Button's comments about retaining half of Hemsky's salary and getting a 2nd rounder (if we're lucky) for him as separate thoughts. That might not be true though. I do agree that Hemsky at $2.5M should be worth more than just a 2nd rounder.

I am also not completely against Hemsky. I think when he's on, he's a treat to watch and a force. But I think that blinds people a bit too much.. I don't think he's a very regularly dominant player, and I also think the injuries have taken such a toll that we never really know how many games he'll be good for each year. I think he represents something that will always hold us back. I think we need to look ahead. It wouldn't be the end of the world if we hung on to him, but I'd prefer to turn the page and fill his game roster spot with a strong winger that opens up space for the other talent we have here.

It's like each year our excitement is high because we have a better Hemsky ready to go.. then the wheels fall off that and we're stuck saying.. oh damn, no more Hemsky.. well maybe Omark / Paajarvi / insertotherplayer can fill in for him... and they can't. Really Hemsky is a good player and important here, but I don't think he fulfills our need for enough of the season, if you get my meaning.

Avatar
#38 DSF
May 20 2013, 01:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
madjam wrote:

Hemsky for Fisher straight up .

Carrie?

You might have to throw in a pick and a prospect.

Avatar
#39 clyde
May 20 2013, 01:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

7, 14, 10, 9 are the goal totals for the last 4 years from Hemsky. He provides no physical element or defensive ability. Is Button really crazy to suggest no one would be willing to give up a 2nd for this 30 year old? His ppg has gone down dramatically the last 2 years as well. As someone stated, there are going to be better options on the market for free this year when teams start to shed salary.

Avatar
#40 Romulus' Apotheosis
May 20 2013, 01:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Racki wrote:

Damn it.. my reply just got eaten.

Anyways, long story short....

I interpreted Button's comments about retaining half of Hemsky's salary and getting a 2nd rounder (if we're lucky) for him as separate thoughts. That might not be true though. I do agree that Hemsky at $2.5M should be worth more than just a 2nd rounder.

I am also not completely against Hemsky. I think when he's on, he's a treat to watch and a force. But I think that blinds people a bit too much.. I don't think he's a very regularly dominant player, and I also think the injuries have taken such a toll that we never really know how many games he'll be good for each year. I think he represents something that will always hold us back. I think we need to look ahead. It wouldn't be the end of the world if we hung on to him, but I'd prefer to turn the page and fill his game roster spot with a strong winger that opens up space for the other talent we have here.

It's like each year our excitement is high because we have a better Hemsky ready to go.. then the wheels fall off that and we're stuck saying.. oh damn, no more Hemsky.. well maybe Omark / Paajarvi / insertotherplayer can fill in for him... and they can't. Really Hemsky is a good player and important here, but I don't think he fulfills our need for enough of the season, if you get my meaning.

here's the piece so we don't all have to guess:

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/sports/hockey/edmonton-oilers/Hockey+World+Ales+Hemsky+days+Edmonton/8407920/story.html

and here's the quote:

“I don’t think there’s a market for him … I shouldn’t say there’s no market,” said former NHL general Craig Button, who now works for TSN. “But the salary cap is coming down to $64.3 million. He makes $5 million for one more year. Would the Oilers pick up half of that to trade him, 50-50 (with another team)? That would still free up $2.5 million in cap space for the Oilers.

“I don’t know if they can get something tangible in return for Hemsky. Andrew Cogliano got the Oilers a second-round draft (pick). I don’t know if they can get that for Hemsky,” Button said.

I guess you can interpret that two ways... but it seems more logical to me that he is continuing down the same path in his line of thought.

Not sure how we could resolve it really. One problem is the way Matheson inserts info into the quote and then a paragraph break... so you are unsure if he broke up the line of thought, or if Button presented these things as separate ideas.

I take your point about "saw him bad for too long"... but I don't think that is a good way to manage your assets... i.e., I get your attitude: "let's just move on already"... but if you are running a team that way, you ought to be fired immediately.

Bad GMs get fixated on certain players either being the problem or the solution ("Lucic will fix everything! here's everything I have!!!")

If Hemsky's value is really so low on the market as to make Button's assessment his best possible return... well, then you'd be insane to take that return to simply move on from the player. Much better to retain the asset, keep him on the 3rd line if need be, hope he rebounds and take whatever comes next year.

There are two right answers here: Button doesn't have a clue and any GM that follows his logic belongs on the same panel of failed GMs.

Avatar
#41 geno
May 20 2013, 01:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
DSF wrote:

No, no it isn't.

There are going to be more than a few players players bought out and will be available for nothing, nevermind a second round pick.

One example is David Booth, another injury prone winger who has similar stats to Hemsky since the last lockout but can't stay healthy.

It's likely the Canucks buy him out so, not only does another team not have to spend assets to acquire him, they also don't have to live with any part of his last contract.

You can bet that the market for Hemsky, even at $2.5M, is very, very small.

Hemsky since lockout: 467GP 345P. .74PPG

Booth since lockout: 377GP 199P .53PPG

Difference .21PPG

I guess Eberle(.8PPG) and Stamkos(1.03PPG) also have similar career stats. Equal value I guess.

Don't know which lockout you're talking about, or which hemsky you're talking about.

Also Booth just came off a 12 game season.

Avatar
#42 geno
May 20 2013, 01:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props
geno wrote:

Hemsky since lockout: 467GP 345P. .74PPG

Booth since lockout: 377GP 199P .53PPG

Difference .21PPG

I guess Eberle(.8PPG) and Stamkos(1.03PPG) also have similar career stats. Equal value I guess.

Don't know which lockout you're talking about, or which hemsky you're talking about.

Also Booth just came off a 12 game season.

oops that's wrong. Hemsky's PPG was actually .83PPG after the lockout.

So a difference of 0.3PPG

Do you even think or research before you type dumb comments like "David Booth, another injury prone winger who has similar stats to Hemsky since the last lockout"?

I don't think you realize the player Hemsky was before 2012.

Avatar
#43 michael
May 20 2013, 01:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Hemsky will playing 3rd line minutes next season plus 2cd unit PP. Yakupov has surpassed him. Hemsky if he plays at a reasonable clip should be a valuable asset either in terms of trade or as a 3rd line winger for this team. It would take a 60 point plus season for Hemsky to come back and ask for another 2 year 5 million per year contract. It won't happen here. Either way I see this as Hemsky's last year as an Oiler if he performs or if does not perform. The only question is if does rebound what will he be worth in an Olympic year? Button's opinion may reflect current market considerations due to declining cap space but it does not include a limited free agent market. The FA market this off season is pathetic even factoring in buy outs this summer.

Avatar
#44 @Oilanderp
May 20 2013, 01:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props

Even Hitler knows: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnqaRY00Cug

Avatar
#45 DSF
May 20 2013, 01:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
geno wrote:

oops that's wrong. Hemsky's PPG was actually .83PPG after the lockout.

So a difference of 0.3PPG

Do you even think or research before you type dumb comments like "David Booth, another injury prone winger who has similar stats to Hemsky since the last lockout"?

I don't think you realize the player Hemsky was before 2012.

Yeah, I'm sure those extra 20 points aper season that occurred mainly half a decade ago will be enough to supercharge his value.

Bottom line is, in his last 4 seasons, he's averaged 30 points.

Avatar
#46 Todd
May 20 2013, 01:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
DSF wrote:

Yeah, I'm sure those extra 20 points aper season that occurred mainly half a decade ago will be enough to supercharge his value.

Bottom line is, in his last 4 seasons, he's averaged 30 points.

Maybe we could trade Hemsky and Yakupov for Peter Mueller.

Avatar
#47 Romulus' Apotheosis
May 20 2013, 01:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I think with Hemsky you are going to have to come up with the answer to this question:

If you can only get .50 on the $1, what is your rationale for pulling the trigger?

Avatar
#48 Todd
May 20 2013, 01:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
clyde wrote:

7, 14, 10, 9 are the goal totals for the last 4 years from Hemsky. He provides no physical element or defensive ability. Is Button really crazy to suggest no one would be willing to give up a 2nd for this 30 year old? His ppg has gone down dramatically the last 2 years as well. As someone stated, there are going to be better options on the market for free this year when teams start to shed salary.

You Flamer fans make me laugh. You guys are convinced that cheap/free/awesome/top6/elite players are going to be raining like skittles this season due to the salary cap and then uncle Feaster is going to gobble them all up and become awesome so fast its gonna be sick.

Good luck with that....

PS - I agree Hemsky is worth very little in a trade. But who cares. Keep him, he isn't detrimental and unless we make some sort of monster move I don't think cap space matters much this year. I like him, flaws and all. In a tertiary role on this team he is great depth.

Avatar
#49 geno
May 20 2013, 02:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
DSF wrote:

Yeah, I'm sure those extra 20 points aper season that occurred mainly half a decade ago will be enough to supercharge his value.

Bottom line is, in his last 4 seasons, he's averaged 30 points.

2 of them he was near a point per game. Don't get me wrong, Hemsky doesn't have much value at all on the trade market. But to say he n booth have similar stats since the lockout is ridiculous. Hemsky's been extremely good since the lockout. Booth had 1 good season.

Avatar
#50 geno
May 20 2013, 02:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
3
props
clyde wrote:

7, 14, 10, 9 are the goal totals for the last 4 years from Hemsky. He provides no physical element or defensive ability. Is Button really crazy to suggest no one would be willing to give up a 2nd for this 30 year old? His ppg has gone down dramatically the last 2 years as well. As someone stated, there are going to be better options on the market for free this year when teams start to shed salary.

and crosby only had 15G in 36GP. It's called being a playmaker. aye aye aye

"Martin St. Louis only had 17 goals in 48 games this year. He sucks!"

Comments are closed for this article.