San Jose Sharks looking to trade Martin Havlat?

Jonathan Willis
June 01 2013 09:59AM

With San Jose making their playoff exit on Tuesday, focus has now shifted to the team’s off-season aims. One of them: dealing away veteran winger Martin Havlat.

The Report

From the Mercury News’ Tim Kawakami (via Lyle Richardson):

I presume the Sharks will move on or discard Martin Havlat, who is owed $10 million over the next two seasons -- the Sharks probably will try to trade him to anybody willing to take that money. If there's no deal, they will have to use the amnesty provision and pay out 66 percent of the contract ($6.67 million in Havlat's case) to be done with him.

Kawakami is actually mistaken on the buyout amount – despite his cap hit Havlat is owed $11 million in actual salary over the next two seasons, meaning that a buyout would actually cost $7.33 million.

Havlat’s contract also originally included a no-trade clause which he waived to join the Sharks; it’s unclear whether that clause is still in effect or is negated by that trade.

An Opportunity?

One of the difficulties for the Oilers this summer is what to do with Ales Hemsky. The long-time Oiler has a deserved reputation for being injury prone, is seen as likely on the way out as the Oilers attempt to upgrade their size, and has a contract (paying $5 million next season) that may make it difficult to trade him and get value back.

The big disadvantage to bringing Havlat in to replace Hemsky is the extra year on his contract, but there are some advantages that may offset that. For one, he’s much bigger than Hemsky, being listed at 6’2”, 210 pounds. For another, the left-shooting winger generally plays right wing but has played left wing earlier in his career, so he may be a better positional fit. He has also been relatively healthy the last few years, playing 83% of his team’s games over the last five seasons, though he’s currently on the shelf with a lower body injury.

In a straight 1-for-1 trade, the extra year on Havlat’s contract is too much of a disadvantage to compensate for his advantages over Hemsky. But if San Jose was willing to sweeten the pot a little – perhaps by retaining some of that second year salary or by including something else (they have three second round draft picks), is it a deal that could make sense for the Oilers?

It really depends what other options the Oilers have; likely, this would be too much of a lateral move to make sense, particularly if they have a chance at a player like Nathan Horton in free agency.

Recently around the Nation Network

Justin Azevedo lists Compliance Buyout Candidates for the Western Conference over at NHL Numbers; which three names does he have in mind as potential Oilers buyouts?

 Click the link above to read the whole piece, or feel free check out some of my other pieces here:

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is Managing Editor of the Nation Network. He also currently writes for the Edmonton Journal's Cult of Hockey, Grantland, and Hockey Prospectus. His work has appeared at theScore, ESPN and Puck Daddy. He was previously founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue. Contact him at jonathan (dot) willis (at) live (dot) ca.
Avatar
#1 YEP
June 01 2013, 10:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I like that trade proposal. However we may have to sweeten the pot a bit because there may be a team who offers more.

I'd also look at signing Ryder for secondary scoring and vet presence.

What about trading the 7th overall for Boone Jenner?

Avatar
#2 madjam
June 01 2013, 10:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Seems like he is bit of a headache no matter where he goes . I'd shy away from him . Same I suppose could be said of most of the buyouts . You get them at a good cost maybe worth a try . Prefer to see us go after Vanek or Heatley if their teams go that route .

Avatar
#3 Czar
June 01 2013, 10:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

I'll take a pass. The guy is 32 and has injury issues of his own, costs more money, longer term and would be on his 5th team. As you said JW,it would be a lateral move at best.

Any word on what Antti Raanta decided?

Avatar
#5 Czar
June 01 2013, 10:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
madjam wrote:

Seems like he is bit of a headache no matter where he goes . I'd shy away from him . Same I suppose could be said of most of the buyouts . You get them at a good cost maybe worth a try . Prefer to see us go after Vanek or Heatley if their teams go that route .

Heatley? Just the name is enough to give me a headache. Please keep that D bag away from the kids!

Avatar
#6 Cutterov
June 01 2013, 10:45AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Seems like a pretty lateral deal and do not see why we would want to eat more money... To be completely honest I'd take Hemsky over Havlat... Not a great proposal

Avatar
#8 Czar
June 01 2013, 10:47AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Jonathan Willis

So it's down to us and Minny? Reports say he was looking seriously at 3 teams and Minny was one of them. Hopefully Chabot described just how poor our goaltender depth is,way more hurdles for him in Minny.

Avatar
#9 Death Metal Nightmare
June 01 2013, 11:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props

100% no to Havlat. trade Hemsky for a different type of player, please. anything but speedy euro-floaters who are injured more often than not.

Avatar
#10 shea78
June 01 2013, 11:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I truly don't believe that Horton is a possibility. I think he stays out East and most likely he stays with Boston.

Avatar
#11 WhattaMike
June 01 2013, 11:04AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Hey JW, I like to believe that Hemsky is for being part of a defenceman trade package or in a deal that moves the Oilers up to fourth to fifth in the draft.

I dont know what Florida wants to do with their second overall pick but Tallon is open apparently to deal up to within the teams in the top ten only.

Havlat to me is not a better pick up for the Oilers when forward type deals to go for Bickell, Stalberg, Horton, to Boyd Gordon, etc, are available. His contract does not then change the cap space of the Oilers either...and for two more years while Hemsky is just one yr.

also, I am liking the idea of Raanta being with the Oilers. Hope that one works out

Avatar
#12 Quicksilver ballet
June 01 2013, 11:06AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Not a fan of either of these players. Do anything you can to get these kind of underachievers off your roster. If these guys were UFA's going into this summer, these on again off again types would be lucky to get half of what they feel they're worth. Seen enough of these soft Euro type players. No wonder we're on our 4th coach in these last 5 yrs.

Avatar
#13 Oiler Al
June 01 2013, 11:11AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

You might as well keep Hemsky, for the sake of a few pounds.. there is no advantage. In fact I sooner keep Hemsky vs Havlat.

Havlat though talented , dosen't come to play every shift.

Spend your time and money chasing Bicknell, who is a UFA, brings some much need grit to his game.

I woiuld also target guys like Torres and Ott. This is what the Oilers need, not another Euro slick player without heart.

Think play offs.. you see what kind of players this team is missing.

Avatar
#14 John Chambers
June 01 2013, 11:12AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Trade Hemsky for Briere.

Avatar
#15 15w40
June 01 2013, 11:12AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

If FLA is open to trading the 2nd pick and Mackinnon is there, would you trade either #14 or #64 straight up for the centre man and retain #7 overall and select a D-man??

Havlat for Hemsky seems to me like its just giving both players a change in address - no real advantage player wise either way. Extra year on $$ may cause an issue.

Avatar
#17 Quicksilver ballet
June 01 2013, 11:20AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
John Chambers wrote:

Trade Hemsky for Briere.

Horc for Briere, then each team could buy each others albatross out and send then back to their old teams to sign on the cheap end of the scale. 10 is due 7 over 2 yrs, and Daniel is due 5 over that same span.

Horc at 1.5-2 mill for 3/4 line duties is far better than the staus quo.

Avatar
#18 Smokey
June 01 2013, 11:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Seems sideways and pointless. I think we will see Hemsky this season. This team went into tank mode after he left at the end of the season. I think this team will miss him more then we think we would. I betcha you ask Eberle would think of Hemsky being traded, it would sadden him knowing he'll take a brunt of the extra attention.

Avatar
#19 bumboclate
June 01 2013, 11:24AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Whattamike Hemmer is not going to be involved in any trade for high draft picks. No one wants him. I believe that we can still get a really good player at #7 if sean monahan is gone than darnell nurse is our guy. DN games reminds me of chris webber. DN is the second best dman in the draft and if hes there and not SM is gone than we take him and be happy!!

Avatar
#20 Walter Sobchak
June 01 2013, 11:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I don't see a fit here.

Avatar
#21 Quicksilver ballet
June 01 2013, 11:27AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
2
props
Jonathan Willis wrote:

'Ales, thanks for wrecking your body in a vain attempt to help a terrible team win hockey games. Now get out of town, you soft floating piece of Euro Trash.'

I just don't get some Oilers fans.

And to think he still gets injured at his usual sub 95% effort level. Marches to the beat of his own drummer. If there's a role model the Oilers don't want these kids to pattern themselves after, Hemmer's the guy. Mr. I don't need to improve can't be outta here soon enough.

Avatar
#22 madjam
June 01 2013, 11:35AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Hope doesn't seem to cut it anymore with most . We have three "wing and a prayer " newbies in the form of Belov , Klefbom and Marincin . I don't perceive a marked increase in defencesive efficiency if we use all three . We need a top 1-2 to be competitive and I doubt any of them meet that requirement . Sounds like we are not even sold on Smid -he may be up for trade as suggested on other sites . I think there's more questions now with all the talk of how we are going to get better , than answers .

Avatar
#23 John Chambers
June 01 2013, 11:39AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
15w40 wrote:

If FLA is open to trading the 2nd pick and Mackinnon is there, would you trade either #14 or #64 straight up for the centre man and retain #7 overall and select a D-man??

Havlat for Hemsky seems to me like its just giving both players a change in address - no real advantage player wise either way. Extra year on $$ may cause an issue.

Eberle for MacKinnon is maybe the smartest trade proposal I've heard in a month

Avatar
#24 Sanaa Montana
June 01 2013, 11:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
5
props

@Quicksilver ballet

No matter how hard you try, you will never be DSF! Even with the sub 95% effort/thought level you put into your comments, you still aint saying sh!t.

What exactly is your Euro trash? A Canadian that forgot or turned his back on his European roots? A recycled European? I dont understand your wisdom, please explain.

Avatar
#25 Smokey
June 01 2013, 11:49AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
6
props
Jonathan Willis wrote:

'Ales, thanks for wrecking your body in a vain attempt to help a terrible team win hockey games. Now get out of town, you soft floating piece of Euro Trash.'

I just don't get some Oilers fans.

I don't get any Oilers fans. Many nights even last year he would be the best player on the ice. The opposite team would have fits watching him undress their forwards and defenders. When Hemsky's gone we will see other players struggle because he still has to be contained these days. Other players benefit with better match-ups.

He's not a 5 mil player now. If he was a 3-4 million dollar player and a 50-60 point guy when healthy in a secondary scoring role we would be ecstatic. I'm in the camp that they guy deserved more then 4.3 mil for 6 for his cap friendly home town discount contract. (I don't factor in the injuries) He was a 5 to 5.5 mil player then, he's getting a mild overpayment now.

Our record when he went down was horrible, and what happened to Sam Gagner's production? He blew once Hemsky was done. the Oilers also had some difficulties scoring outside of Yakupov. You can't replace skill easily and unless your getting proper compensation, let him play out his contract.

Some Oiler should not be too hasty to run him outta town. Frankly I'd let him play out his year, no point in trading him for a 3rd rounder, and offer him a 3.5 million 2 or 3 year deal or let his take his talents to South Beach, or Madison Square or Joe Louis. I know the idea is to get bigger and younger, but hell he's 30, he produces, and he has never been the problem. The Oilers problem is they are missing size and grit throughout their line-up. The Oilers have suffered through years of poor development and they did not produce enough serviceable assets.

Hemsky played here when no one else wanted, went to the dirty areas like an undersized power forward, took too many Rhegier checks, and wore his body down. Lets give the guy respect...

Avatar
#26 Whattamike
June 01 2013, 11:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@bumboclate, I know Hemskyis not worth a high pick alone, but he has offensive value still.

I can see Hemsky packaged with trading the #7 and a prospect like Gernat or Musil in order to get to #2, #4 or #5.

Maybe the Oil also throws in next yrs first rounder to to get that #2 pick from Florida. Especially if they want MacKinnon. Gagner or hemsky in a package would be okay for Florida as both can provide some decent offence...although Gagner is 23 and better suited for the deal potential.

I also think Carolina will go for Darnell nurse instead of a forward, or even trade that #5 pick to the Oil for the #7 with prospects (again Gernat/Musil) and maybe Omark or Rajala. I think Nurse will be available at #7 still and Carolina will gladly deal it for a kid like Gernat or Musil.

Thats probably only gonna happen if the Oil want barkov or Nichushkin really bad.

Hemsky for Havlat is not a good upgrade or deal right now with Havlat older at 32 and with that extra yr contract.

Avatar
#27 OilersBrass
June 01 2013, 12:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
madjam wrote:

Hope doesn't seem to cut it anymore with most . We have three "wing and a prayer " newbies in the form of Belov , Klefbom and Marincin . I don't perceive a marked increase in defencesive efficiency if we use all three . We need a top 1-2 to be competitive and I doubt any of them meet that requirement . Sounds like we are not even sold on Smid -he may be up for trade as suggested on other sites . I think there's more questions now with all the talk of how we are going to get better , than answers .

How is Belov a "newbie"???

Avatar
#28 djc
June 01 2013, 12:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
5
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Not a fan of either of these players. Do anything you can to get these kind of underachievers off your roster. If these guys were UFA's going into this summer, these on again off again types would be lucky to get half of what they feel they're worth. Seen enough of these soft Euro type players. No wonder we're on our 4th coach in these last 5 yrs.

Euro trash?

Is there anyway you and DSF can start your own blog? That way you both can post there 20 times a day, act/pretend you know more than everyone, complain and whine about every decision the Oilers have made and haven't made, cry about Weber, and then the rest of us don't have get annoyed reading your "insight". I'm embarrassed that you get lumped into the term "oilers fans".

Avatar
#29 Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)
June 01 2013, 12:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

No way to Havlat.

Hemmer has been the Oilers best player for many years. Under rated in terms of toughness and value. Deserving of our gratitude.

Time to move him if you get fair value. Should have moved him at the deadline for max value.

Avatar
#30 Rama Lama
June 01 2013, 12:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Keep Havlat away from the young guns.........there are too many possibilities out there to explore besides Havlat.

Watching the combines, I would move heaven and earth to get Nichuskin. Forget getting a huge center, get this guy now..........the possibilities of watching him play along side Yaks is too much for one to imagine!

Nichuskin is big, fast, and can skate like the wind, there is nothing not to like.

Avatar
#31 Smokey
June 01 2013, 12:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
1
props
Whattamike wrote:

@bumboclate, I know Hemskyis not worth a high pick alone, but he has offensive value still.

I can see Hemsky packaged with trading the #7 and a prospect like Gernat or Musil in order to get to #2, #4 or #5.

Maybe the Oil also throws in next yrs first rounder to to get that #2 pick from Florida. Especially if they want MacKinnon. Gagner or hemsky in a package would be okay for Florida as both can provide some decent offence...although Gagner is 23 and better suited for the deal potential.

I also think Carolina will go for Darnell nurse instead of a forward, or even trade that #5 pick to the Oil for the #7 with prospects (again Gernat/Musil) and maybe Omark or Rajala. I think Nurse will be available at #7 still and Carolina will gladly deal it for a kid like Gernat or Musil.

Thats probably only gonna happen if the Oil want barkov or Nichushkin really bad.

Hemsky for Havlat is not a good upgrade or deal right now with Havlat older at 32 and with that extra yr contract.

I don't know what site I saw it on but when teams generally move up in a draft from say say 7th to 4th or 5th, that added pieces are like a late second or third round selection, not a top 6 forward and your second or third best prospect like Gernat. The guys a gem where we got him. He was better then Reinhardt this season who went 4th overall.

These suggestion seem a little bit unrealistic to me. For a Jones or McKinnon you may need that level of overpay as you suggest. I dunno what it would take. These deals never get done unless its a Bowmeester or Rick Nash scenario. Two teams trading a spot or maybe two. Correct me if I am wrong the only other scenario was Spezza for Yashin, but look who was the GM orchestrating that disaster.

This may be a bad example, and roast me accordingly. Say like last year when TO had the 5th. Would we have taken the 5th, Kulemin, and Holzer or Percy for Yakipov. I don't think we would have.

Avatar
#32 clyde
June 01 2013, 12:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
John Chambers wrote:

Eberle for MacKinnon is maybe the smartest trade proposal I've heard in a month

Not if you are Florida. I really can't see them making that move especially for Mckinnon. It would take more. Talon would need to get blown away with an amazing offer. Hard to say though.

Avatar
#33 horndog77
June 01 2013, 12:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

Thanks but no thanks! Seriously Hemsky and Havlat are like brothers from different mothers, high end talent but made of glass. The last thing Edmonton needs to do is take on more salary. The thought of getting another second rounder sounds great, but I'm sure trading Hemsky to a team for a second rounder would be much easier.

Avatar
#34 Thinker
June 01 2013, 12:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

I was thinking about it, do you think columbus would trade 19 overall plus johansen for gagner plus a second? Then we can try to move up, or pick lindholm/monoghan, then draft a mantha or similar with an extra first. Nuge lindholm johansen horcoff ufa(4th liner)

Avatar
#35 Smokey
June 01 2013, 12:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Rama Lama wrote:

Keep Havlat away from the young guns.........there are too many possibilities out there to explore besides Havlat.

Watching the combines, I would move heaven and earth to get Nichuskin. Forget getting a huge center, get this guy now..........the possibilities of watching him play along side Yaks is too much for one to imagine!

Nichuskin is big, fast, and can skate like the wind, there is nothing not to like.

Ya, I almost hope Nichuskin is gone at 7th. That kid is something else, world class speed and size and hands. He's a no brainer top 5 talent that I'm scared may slip totally do to the Russian Factor. The Oilers would probably draft for postion rather then BPA and I don't want to be thinking for 15 years we took the wrong player. Nurse and Nichuskin are the wild cards. If Nurse goes to Carolina which is possible, and Nichuskin slips, I think I'd join the bandwagon to move Hall to Center, and get the kid.

Imagine a line of Nich/Hall/Yak...would there be a faster and a more totally defensively irresponsible line in the NHL. Sign me up.

Avatar
#36 DieHard
June 01 2013, 12:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
John Chambers wrote:

Eberle for MacKinnon is maybe the smartest trade proposal I've heard in a month

How about Eberle plus #7 plus Musil for #2 (if MacKinnon on the board) and Kulikov.

Avatar
#37 magisterrex
June 01 2013, 01:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
4
props
djc wrote:

Euro trash?

Is there anyway you and DSF can start your own blog? That way you both can post there 20 times a day, act/pretend you know more than everyone, complain and whine about every decision the Oilers have made and haven't made, cry about Weber, and then the rest of us don't have get annoyed reading your "insight". I'm embarrassed that you get lumped into the term "oilers fans".

Had to prop this. Best trade proposal I've ever seen on this board.

Avatar
#38 Walter Sobchak
June 01 2013, 01:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Smokey wrote:

I don't get any Oilers fans. Many nights even last year he would be the best player on the ice. The opposite team would have fits watching him undress their forwards and defenders. When Hemsky's gone we will see other players struggle because he still has to be contained these days. Other players benefit with better match-ups.

He's not a 5 mil player now. If he was a 3-4 million dollar player and a 50-60 point guy when healthy in a secondary scoring role we would be ecstatic. I'm in the camp that they guy deserved more then 4.3 mil for 6 for his cap friendly home town discount contract. (I don't factor in the injuries) He was a 5 to 5.5 mil player then, he's getting a mild overpayment now.

Our record when he went down was horrible, and what happened to Sam Gagner's production? He blew once Hemsky was done. the Oilers also had some difficulties scoring outside of Yakupov. You can't replace skill easily and unless your getting proper compensation, let him play out his contract.

Some Oiler should not be too hasty to run him outta town. Frankly I'd let him play out his year, no point in trading him for a 3rd rounder, and offer him a 3.5 million 2 or 3 year deal or let his take his talents to South Beach, or Madison Square or Joe Louis. I know the idea is to get bigger and younger, but hell he's 30, he produces, and he has never been the problem. The Oilers problem is they are missing size and grit throughout their line-up. The Oilers have suffered through years of poor development and they did not produce enough serviceable assets.

Hemsky played here when no one else wanted, went to the dirty areas like an undersized power forward, took too many Rhegier checks, and wore his body down. Lets give the guy respect...

I'll go by paragraph.

No.no.no. Hemsky was the best player on the ice in maybe 4 or 5 games....might have been! You could argue that the players around Hemsky made him better! You could also argue that Hemsky was ONE of the reasons that the second line bleed chance after chance.

No. He's not a 50 to 60 point guy anymore, you can't give ice time to a player that MIGHT stay healthy or MIGHT score 50 points. Yakupov is a superior player to Hemsky and your willing to cut his development and ice time on the off chance Hemsky MIGHT stay healthy or MIGHT score 50 points.

Comparing Gagner production to Hemsky being injured is ridicules, Yakupov was still scoring and Gagner production slowed because the PP dried up on him, not because Hemsky was injured! Gagner still produced despite Hemsky being injured for the last 3 years.

This is a business and as much as we as fans have attachments to certain players, it's what's best for the team and the players on the team, and in some cases best for the player on the way out. Hemsky position has been filled, with a better player, so use Hemsky to fill a position that needs a better player down the roster.

I agree that he was a great player for this team, but keeping him is not filling a role on another spot in the line up that needs an upgrade.

Avatar
#39 Oilergasm
June 01 2013, 01:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
DieHard wrote:

How about Eberle plus #7 plus Musil for #2 (if MacKinnon on the board) and Kulikov.

I'd say Eberle, Musil and #7 is a lot steep for #2.

How about Eberle, Gagner and #7 for

#2, Gudbranson and Matthias

Possibly include a Horcoff for Jovanovski in there, then use a buyout on Jovo?

Avatar
#40 OilersBrass
June 01 2013, 01:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Walter Sobchak wrote:

I'll go by paragraph.

No.no.no. Hemsky was the best player on the ice in maybe 4 or 5 games....might have been! You could argue that the players around Hemsky made him better! You could also argue that Hemsky was ONE of the reasons that the second line bleed chance after chance.

No. He's not a 50 to 60 point guy anymore, you can't give ice time to a player that MIGHT stay healthy or MIGHT score 50 points. Yakupov is a superior player to Hemsky and your willing to cut his development and ice time on the off chance Hemsky MIGHT stay healthy or MIGHT score 50 points.

Comparing Gagner production to Hemsky being injured is ridicules, Yakupov was still scoring and Gagner production slowed because the PP dried up on him, not because Hemsky was injured! Gagner still produced despite Hemsky being injured for the last 3 years.

This is a business and as much as we as fans have attachments to certain players, it's what's best for the team and the players on the team, and in some cases best for the player on the way out. Hemsky position has been filled, with a better player, so use Hemsky to fill a position that needs a better player down the roster.

I agree that he was a great player for this team, but keeping him is not filling a role on another spot in the line up that needs an upgrade.

I couldn't disagree more with everything you just said. Yakupov will be better than Hemsky yes, but there's no way he is better than Hemsky now.

Who do you suggest upgrading Hemsky with? Keep in mind before suggesting a ridiculous (ps. that's how ridiculous is properly spelt) trade, that teams don't want to give up a player that is better than Hemsky.

Avatar
#41 Oiler AlA
June 01 2013, 01:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Jonathan Willis wrote:

'Ales, thanks for wrecking your body in a vain attempt to help a terrible team win hockey games. Now get out of town, you soft floating piece of Euro Trash.'

I just don't get some Oilers fans.

Jon, Hemsky, is soft today because he got pounded over the past several years,even though he's what 30 years old, his best days in the NHL, are behind him, due too injuries.

But hey, pound me for $40 million bucks he collected in the last 6 years.

Bigger stars then him have been moved in this league ,,, its business. You can't sit on the bench visualizing how great he was 4 years ago.

I would say that if the team cant get a premium return on him, might as well see what he puts up in the coming season.. its a gamble.

Avatar
#42 clyde
June 01 2013, 01:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
DieHard wrote:

How about Eberle plus #7 plus Musil for #2 (if MacKinnon on the board) and Kulikov.

Detroit offered Jarncrok, a 1st and Oulette for Kulikov at the deadline after they missed out on JBO. That was turned down so I can't see this happening. I don't think Talon can do that even with Kulikov out of your equation unless he is sure on the #7 pick. Giving up a franchise type guy is so risky. With Huberdeau sitting there waiting for an elite center to play with, I just don't think that would do it.

Avatar
#44 Quicksilver ballet
June 01 2013, 02:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Jonathan Willis

Jonny, when MacT mentioned, guys at best were going to be a non factor most nights, Hemsky is one of the guys he was referring to. The play dies far too often when on the stick of either 83 or 89. In a puck possession league, guys like these kill you.

Put Clarkson or Hartnell in his place and the Oilers are already a better hockey club. A one game a month player in Hemsky, out, and in, a guy who'll give it his all for 60-70 nights a season.

Softie out, and a grinder in. The grinder i'm sure will put up more points than Hemsky.

Avatar
#45 MKE
June 01 2013, 02:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
4
props

@Quicksilver ballet

No one is saying don't trade him. But your "euro trash" comment is out of line and really disrespectful.

Then again maybe the only people you have respect for are the people who make more rude, condescending, and overly negative comments then you do.

Avatar
#46 MKE
June 01 2013, 02:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props

@Jonathan Willis

You probably have addressed this already, but is Belov a UFA next summer?

Avatar
#47 OilersBrass
June 01 2013, 03:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
4
props
MKE wrote:

No one is saying don't trade him. But your "euro trash" comment is out of line and really disrespectful.

Then again maybe the only people you have respect for are the people who make more rude, condescending, and overly negative comments then you do.

Someone had to say it! Good on ya man!

Avatar
#48 Wäx Män Riley
June 01 2013, 04:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
shea78 wrote:

I truly don't believe that Horton is a possibility. I think he stays out East and most likely he stays with Boston.

I think he stays out east too, but Boston is in some Cap trouble with only 17 players signed and just over $6M in space.

Avatar
#49 Wäx Män Riley
June 01 2013, 04:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
Wäx Män Riley wrote:

I think he stays out east too, but Boston is in some Cap trouble with only 17 players signed and just over $6M in space.

Most of Boston's core is locked up though, so it probably is a good possibility he stays in Boston

Avatar
#50 Wäx Män Riley
June 01 2013, 04:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
+1
0
props
MKE wrote:

You probably have addressed this already, but is Belov a UFA next summer?

Capgeek says a UFA after next year.

Comments are closed for this article.