WHAT THE CLUTTERBUCK???

Jason Gregor
June 25 2013 11:43AM

Minnesota Wild beat reporter Mike Russo wrote that the Oilers are actively pursuing Cal Clutterbuck and the trade could involve Tyler Pitlick. 

One team hot after him is Edmonton; the Wild has talked to the Oilers about a deal that would include Minnesotan Tyler Pitlick. 

Russo had the above line in his piece on the Wild's salary cap situation and where Clutterbuck fits. Clutterbuck is an RFA, and he just finished a three-year deal with a $1.4 million cap hit. He made $1.7 million in actual dollars last year, so you'd think he'd be looking at a deal north of $2 million.

Clutterbuck is coming off his worst season in four years. He scored only 4 goals and 10 points in 42 games last season, but the previous three years he was decent offensively.

YEAR             GP      G        A      PTS      PIM        +/-
2010              74      13      8        21         52         -8
2011              76       19     15      34         79         -5
2012              74      15      12      27        103       -4

The Oilers wouldn't add Clutterbuck just for his offence. He's been a 3rd pairing forward on the PK the past four seasons in Minnesota, and he plays with an edge. He's one of the most physical forwards in the NHL, having led the NHL in hits in 2010 (318), 2011 (336) and he was 3rd in hits in 2012 with 288.

Some will argue that because the Chicago Blackhawks rarely hit you don't need physical players to win, but the Oilers don't possess a blueline like the Hawks, nor are their forwards in the same category as Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews and Patrick Sharp.

The Oilers haven't had a physical player, who could produce and play significant minutes since Ehan Moreau scored 20 goals in 2004. Ryan Jones was pretty good in 2011, but he's not an overly physical player.

JF Jacques led the Oiler forwards in hits in 2010 with 158.
Ryan Jones had 152 in 2011, and he scored 18 goals.
Lennart Petrell had 122 in 2012 and Mike Brown led them with 65 this past season.

Outside of Jones, none of the others played significant minutes or made much of an impact offensively, and they were usually a liability defensively.

Clutterbuck's corsi numbers aren't stellar, but in 2012 the Wild had the worst corsi rating of any team in the league. The entire team sucked, but Clutterbuck has shown improvement over the years. If you want to see his Corsi, Fenwick and other stats read here.

Clutterbuck is exactly what the Oilers need. A fiesty third line player, who can inject some energy, annoys the opposition, skates well, can help out on the PK, plays on the edge and has some decent offensive potential.

If the Oilers have to part with Pitlick and something else to obtain Clutterbuck, I'd do it yesterday.

RECENTLY BY JASON GREGOR

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#51 rickithebear
June 25 2013, 12:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I forgot hall hit him and the baby had to be carried of like he wrecked his knee for a charlie Hoarse.

you need to be able to play with two seprated shoulder to get to the cup final. Jason Smith grit.

you want a charlie hoarse carry off the ice cry baby guy around our young players.

I take horcoff blocking a puck with his face over this baby!

Pathetic! need this GUY? hall lays it on the line and you bring in a wimp like this!

Just Pathetic!

Avatar
#52 Romulus' Apotheosis
June 25 2013, 12:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Racki wrote:

I think you undervalue him, perhaps. I think most of us are still upset about the loss of Curtis Glencross (whom I'd take over Clutterbuck, mind you) and Brodziak. We need quality bottom six guys. They won't necessarily make Eberle or Gagner play bigger, no, but they can help pot some goals when good old fashioned skill isn't getting the job done.

I think Clutterbuck could also slide up to line two, as needed. It's good to have players in the line up that bring some versatility.

He definitely won't solve all our problems, but if that's MacT's first move (Clutterbuck for Pitlick), he's off to a flying start.

Pitlick might turn into a really good player for Minny, but right now he's doing squat for us, and isn't helping his value any. It's not likely to get any better while he's here either.

Unrelated, but if Gagner signs here, I hope they move him to the wing and find a solid player for that 2nd line C role. We need to get better up the middle somehow.

I really think we are arguing at the margins here.

That said, I really don't see Clutterbuck on a 2nd line on a contending team. If he's there on our team Eakins is crazy or we are looking for another lottery pick.

Agreed about Pitlick. looking like a 2nd round bust. But he's still got time to turn things around and showed well(ish) in the playoffs. He wouldn't be the first prospect to take a strange route to the NHL and find success. But at this point, getting an actual NHL player (even a 4th liner with 3rd line up-side) for near-expiry magic beans is a no-brainer.

Avatar
#53 Eddie Shore
June 25 2013, 12:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@rickithebear

Give it a rest already. You dont like him, we get it.

Avatar
#54 Sanaa Montana
June 25 2013, 12:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Sign him for the 4th line with Konopka and Green.

Avatar
#55 Jesse
June 25 2013, 12:52PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@JasonGregor

"Some will argue that because the Chicago Blackhawks rarely hit you don't need physical players to win, but the Oilers don't possess a blueline like the Hawks, nor are their forwards in the same category as Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews and Patrick Sharp."

I hope you're not talking about Willis's article, because otherwise that's a great big straw man.

Avatar
#56 Sanaa Montana
June 25 2013, 12:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
mlcselli wrote:

This is just the type of player we need. Sure hope MacT is successful in signing him, and really hope Clutterbuck wants to join the Oil.

Any update on how Gagner negotiations are going? Just curious,

Oilers are in talks with the Florida Panther regarding Gagner and his extension. They will either sign and trade him or trade his rights with a right package. Gagner is a Panther in less than a week.

Avatar
#57 Lochenzo
June 25 2013, 12:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Paajarvi doesn't need to hit to be effective. He just needs to use his body to win contested pucks and get his butt to the net. Tomas Holmstrom was a pretty darn good player with some size and he wasn't a hitter.

Avatar
#58 Lochenzo
June 25 2013, 12:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I was thinking the same thing with Gags. It's an offer, not a signing. Maybe it's a message to the other teams that if they are interested in Gags, they'd better step up their offer.

Avatar
#59 DieHard
June 25 2013, 12:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Clutterbuck + for Pitlick. After all, Pitlick was 31st overall and has size. Hate to be hoodwinked again by those Wild.

Avatar
#60 ricfrankton
June 25 2013, 01:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

my sincere apologies with my immature post boring morning lol..... but lets just say weber could be traded how would people think of my mentioned trade? oil get an unquestioned 1d arguably the best in the nhl plus the fourth to pick Barkov which replaces nuge (in a way) as much as oiler fans love Hall i would think weber would be worth it, maybe add colin wilson and eric belanger to the trade. i guess its not a very good topic because its all dream wishes but it is that time of year that anything is possible (besides whats mentioned above LOL)

Avatar
#61 Racki
June 25 2013, 01:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Romulus' Apotheosis wrote:

I really think we are arguing at the margins here.

That said, I really don't see Clutterbuck on a 2nd line on a contending team. If he's there on our team Eakins is crazy or we are looking for another lottery pick.

Agreed about Pitlick. looking like a 2nd round bust. But he's still got time to turn things around and showed well(ish) in the playoffs. He wouldn't be the first prospect to take a strange route to the NHL and find success. But at this point, getting an actual NHL player (even a 4th liner with 3rd line up-side) for near-expiry magic beans is a no-brainer.

Yah, we agree on Pitlick.

As far as Clutterbuck on the 2nd line, let me take a step back. I just more mean he can slide up in a pinch if an injury occurs (mind you, I thought Jones could too). I wouldn't want him there full term either, and I'm not so sure either if I'd want him for very long at all (maybe a game or two here and there).

Avatar
#62 Ducey
June 25 2013, 01:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Clutterbuck 42GP 10pts -5 15th in team scoring, 13:44 TOI, 87 shots, 155 hits

Petrell 35 GP 9pts -4 14th in team scoring, 11:31 ATOI, 23 shots, 63 hits

Other than hitting (and apparently ineffective extra shooting), there is not a lot of difference between the two. Of course Clutterbuck had a down year.

Not saying that the Oilers shouldn't pursue him, but they should not be selling the farm and they should understand why his offense dropped to Petrellian levels.

Avatar
#63 Racki
June 25 2013, 01:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
ricfrankton wrote:

my sincere apologies with my immature post boring morning lol..... but lets just say weber could be traded how would people think of my mentioned trade? oil get an unquestioned 1d arguably the best in the nhl plus the fourth to pick Barkov which replaces nuge (in a way) as much as oiler fans love Hall i would think weber would be worth it, maybe add colin wilson and eric belanger to the trade. i guess its not a very good topic because its all dream wishes but it is that time of year that anything is possible (besides whats mentioned above LOL)

Barkov sets us back, likely (as he's young and you and I can't say for certain he'll jump right in the league and start running). Weber would be a phenomenal addition.

I think this would be a bad move though.

Hall and Nuge are the future of this team at forward.. Barkov will bring risks. I doubt he would be better than either of Nuge or Hall. HIGHLY doubt. So we're losing talent at F. As far as the D, Weber would be amazing on D, but I'd sooner retain both Hall and Nuge and find a lesser d-man to bring in here.

BTW, I missed your original suggestion (or I glossed over it, cause it seemed ridiculous to me), but you might not realize that Weber can't be traded until some time after the draft (due to when he signed his offersheet).

Avatar
#64 HardBoiledOil
June 25 2013, 01:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Pitlick + for Clutterbuck and Gagner to Florida for Nick Bjugstad...i could handle that as long as Bjugstad is NHL ready? he's listed at 6'6" and 220 on HockeyDB.

Avatar
#65 Will
June 25 2013, 01:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Hmm, I like this signing. What position does he play? He seems like a guy that could be slotted up and down the line up depending on how the coach wants to approach the opposition. Need a Tikkanen to protect the Nuge, Clutterbuck. Need a third line to shut down the opposition, Paajarvi and Clutterbuck. This would improve our PK and add the nastiness we've been desperately needing. I just hope he's not another Barker and is on the downturn as oppose to turning it around.

Avatar
#66 Will
June 25 2013, 01:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Will wrote:

Hmm, I like this signing. What position does he play? He seems like a guy that could be slotted up and down the line up depending on how the coach wants to approach the opposition. Need a Tikkanen to protect the Nuge, Clutterbuck. Need a third line to shut down the opposition, Paajarvi and Clutterbuck. This would improve our PK and add the nastiness we've been desperately needing. I just hope he's not another Barker and is on the downturn as oppose to turning it around.

Sorry, rumour, not signing.

Avatar
#67 vetinari
June 25 2013, 01:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

If it's Pitlick and a mid round pick or another prospect, make it happen, MacT!

Avatar
#68 Randaman
June 25 2013, 01:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Bucknuck wrote:

The thing about Clutterbuck that sticks out for me is that he is always hustling. The guy's feet are always moving. With his kind of hustle, I can't see what's not to like about this one. Not sure what's in it for Minnesota, though.

Cap relief. When you are paying two players (Parise & Suter) 1/3 of your payroll something has to give.

Avatar
#69 They're $hittie
June 25 2013, 01:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@HardBoiledOil

Nick is 20 and has 1 nhl point. Gagner already had 130 by than. We need the best player in the trade not future assets because they are big. This sets us back.

Avatar
#70 Oilcan
June 25 2013, 01:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I am amazed at how many people get distracted the new shiny toy. Yes maybe mackinnon and barkov are better at this stage then nuge or yak but the thing with nuge and yak is they have proven they belong in the NHL. They are still insanely young but we know for a fact they can play. Not saying the guys taken can't but no one knows they can. The grass isn't always greener....

Avatar
#71 Taylor Gang
June 25 2013, 01:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Romulus' Apotheosis wrote:

For sure. Bottom 6 was brutal last year and has been since the 06 season. improving there by baby steps is very important.

But we still need to have some perspective on what adding a depth player means. The same goes for the Eager signings.

These guys have a tendency (esp. regarding a team like the Oil that overvalues IMO "size") to be overhyped.

100% agreed. Clutterbuck is at the very least a young hitter so it's pretty safe to say he'd be a better player than Eager.

Mind you, Smithson, Hordichuk, Petrell. All players acquired in the Tambellini era. He just had no sense of what a big skilled player was.

Let's just hope MacT does have that sense.

Avatar
#72 Archaeologuy
June 25 2013, 01:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Clutterbuck to the Oilers for Pitlick and change would be music to my ears. It's too good to pass up.*

*Also, to be real

Avatar
#73 HardBoiledOil
June 25 2013, 01:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
They're $hittie wrote:

Nick is 20 and has 1 nhl point. Gagner already had 130 by than. We need the best player in the trade not future assets because they are big. This sets us back.

true it would, but it makes you wonder if MacT is doing a sign and trade with Gagner and whether MacT is eyeballing one of the Panthers young players in return. i don't really want the Oilers to go and get players who are just "big" either, but let's not forget that Bjugstad was a former 1st rounder and was playing in the NHL last year and is very talented, though didn't do much on the score sheet.

Avatar
#74 LinkfromHyrule
June 25 2013, 01:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

lol the hype about that macT conference led to nothing. Right out of the gate he says "I don't really have much for you" and opens the floor for questions. Man I hate this time of year. :(

Avatar
#75 Spydyr
June 25 2013, 01:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
LinkfromHyrule wrote:

lol the hype about that macT conference led to nothing. Right out of the gate he says "I don't really have much for you" and opens the floor for questions. Man I hate this time of year. :(

So...the new phone were in after all.

Avatar
#76 madjam
June 25 2013, 01:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Gagner and our 7th , for Gudbranson and second overall leaving us Jones .

Avatar
#77 LinkfromHyrule
June 25 2013, 01:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Spydyr

pretty much. About the only interesting thing he did say was that they will likely stay at 7 and draft the player.

Avatar
#78 Spydyr
June 25 2013, 01:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
LinkfromHyrule wrote:

pretty much. About the only interesting thing he did say was that they will likely stay at 7 and draft the player.

Well that beats going backwards in the draft.

Avatar
#79 TonyT
June 25 2013, 02:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Wow! I hate Clutterbuck and he isn't he on record as saying some pretty disperaging remarks after the Gilbert-Schultz trade? Having said that, he's probably exactly the type of a-hole the Oilers haven't had and need.

Avatar
#80 blue
June 25 2013, 02:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
madjam wrote:

Gagner and our 7th , for Gudbranson and second overall leaving us Jones .

Seriously ?

Avatar
#81 Lochenzo
June 25 2013, 02:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I wonder what Chuck Fletcher would be willing to pay to get rid of Heatley's contract. That's the one they want to get rid of.

I'm not saying the Oil are the right team to hold onto that contract until Heatley is healthy and then buy him out. But it would be fun to have a new whipping boy in Edmonton that we can agree, actually deserves it.

Avatar
#82 Thinker
June 25 2013, 02:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think jones is going to slide in the draft 1)Mackinnon-avs love him 2) Drouin- florida just can't pass up his offence 3) nichushkin- tampa reaches, as they have already drafted a dman high in hedman 4) jones-nashville drafts him and trades weber for money reasons 5)Carolina trades down to highest bidder in top 12 to get nurse/ristolainen. Bidding war between Edm and Cal for Barkov. Suspect calgary wins by throwing in their three firsts(feasters an idiot) 6)Calgary drafts... Bo Horvat because jankowski right? Sorry theres some technical feaster logic in there. 7) Edmonton is upset at absence of nichushin, and failure to getbarkov, so they fight over lindholm vs. Monohan. Monohan is 3-line center, and gagner stays, or they trade gagner for big lw, and take lindholm. I suspect the former

Edmonton top 9 looks like this coming out of the draft. Hall gagner yakupov ??? Rnh Eberle Mps Monohan ???

Avatar
#83 bdaZZler
June 25 2013, 02:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

What about a guy like Steve Downie? One would think he could be available in Colorado...Thoughts?

Avatar
#84 laughing pug
June 25 2013, 02:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

My dad roomed with Cal's dad at McMaster. They called his mom Peanut. This is important information.

Avatar
#85 justDOit
June 25 2013, 02:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
ricfrankton wrote:

my sincere apologies with my immature post boring morning lol..... but lets just say weber could be traded how would people think of my mentioned trade? oil get an unquestioned 1d arguably the best in the nhl plus the fourth to pick Barkov which replaces nuge (in a way) as much as oiler fans love Hall i would think weber would be worth it, maybe add colin wilson and eric belanger to the trade. i guess its not a very good topic because its all dream wishes but it is that time of year that anything is possible (besides whats mentioned above LOL)

Taylor for sale or rent

Nuge to Nash for picks (get bent!)

Call Poille and don't relent

Before Weber's bonus is spent

Ah but, two hours of workin phones

Gets a Clowe or Bickell clone

MacT's a man of deals and some zeal

King of the Oil

Avatar
#86 Smokey
June 25 2013, 02:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@DieHard

He's done very little offensively in two years in the AHL. Worse case scenario is a third liner for a future 4th liner.

Avatar
#87 dallylamma
June 25 2013, 02:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
laughing pug wrote:

My dad roomed with Cal's dad at McMaster. They called his mom Peanut. This is important information.

She's got a huge Clutterous?

Avatar
#88 Smokey
June 25 2013, 02:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
dallylamma wrote:

She's got a huge Clutterous?

Funniest post ever!

Have you been saving that for this day.

Avatar
#89 dallylamma
June 25 2013, 02:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Smokey wrote:

Funniest post ever!

Have you been saving that for this day.

Lol, well there must be a reason they called her Peanut....

Avatar
#90 Bucknuck
June 25 2013, 03:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I've often thought that I would like to see Clutterbuck on the Oilers, but I never thought he would be attainable for anything less than a gross overpay. It would add instant grit to the forwards.

The lack of depth at centre terrifies me. MacT must have a plan of some fashion to solve that one.

Avatar
#91 madjam
June 25 2013, 03:08PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Looks like Gagner for Perron and Reaves .

Avatar
#92 Curcro
June 25 2013, 03:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

As for the why of Clutterbuck's offensive decline this year.

1) No Powerplay Time this year. Last year he averaged 2:11 PP Time per game. This year 0:05 PP Time per game. (7 Points last year versus NIL this year)

2) His PDO dropped by 29 points. The majority coming from the on-ice shooting percentage side of the equation.

3) One of his top 3 linemates Kyle Brodziak(71.6%) also had a crap year 8-4-12. Last year he split Matt Cullen (39.4%) and Broziak (33.4%) pretty evenly.

Based on this information, I think that Clutterbuck as an Oiler would likely get in the range of what he accomplished last year which was a 20 point season more or less.

I don't see him getting more PP Time. His PDO may increase resulting closer to 25 points. And I don't think the Oilers have a Centre to play with him at the level of Cullen or Brodziak even.

Don`t even dream of the 34 Point season unless they put him with Hall & Gagner.

Avatar
#93 DieHard
June 25 2013, 03:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Smokey wrote:

He's done very little offensively in two years in the AHL. Worse case scenario is a third liner for a future 4th liner.

I know all about Pitlick. I just want payback for Brodziak.

Avatar
#94 Bucknuck
June 25 2013, 03:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
madjam wrote:

Looks like Gagner for Perron and Reaves .

God I hope not.

Avatar
#95 Benny Botts
June 25 2013, 03:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
madjam wrote:

Looks like Gagner for Perron and Reaves .

Who reported this??

Avatar
#96 Archaeologuy
June 25 2013, 03:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Benny Botts wrote:

Who reported this??

Madjam. So...

Avatar
#97 EHH Team
June 25 2013, 03:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
justDOit wrote:

Taylor for sale or rent

Nuge to Nash for picks (get bent!)

Call Poille and don't relent

Before Weber's bonus is spent

Ah but, two hours of workin phones

Gets a Clowe or Bickell clone

MacT's a man of deals and some zeal

King of the Oil

props

Avatar
#98 G Money
June 25 2013, 04:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Hate Clutterbuck, a hard working but often dirty chickensh*t player who gets under the skin of the opposition. Not a great possession player, but can at least sometimes take a pass or make a pass or exit the zone when he's not trying to hit the other guys.

In other words - badly needed by the Oilers.

Pitlick a small price to pay (even if he turns out to be a decent player, still a poor bet).

Our first line is fine.

We need a strong possession player and a better system on the second line to right that wrong. Clutterbuck is not that player.

Our third and fourth lines bleed shots and goals like a stuck pig. Clutterbuck is an upgrade on most of what we've got right now, especially on the fourth line.

Avatar
#99 madjam
June 25 2013, 04:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Is Clutterbuck better than Pitluck ? Does Clutterbuck fill a role at NHL level where Pitluck currently after 3 years does not ? If yes , then do it . Is there any role Pitluck will do better than Clutterbuck - we are talking about now , not some hype down the road . Is Pitluck more readily replaced than Clutterbuck , or are they both readily replaceable ? Even on our AHL club he is replaceable and lags behind others like Arcobello .

Avatar
#100 Rod from Viking
June 25 2013, 05:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
dallylamma wrote:

She's got a huge Clutterous?

Doesn't peanut mean small not cavernous?

Comments are closed for this article.