FOUR MINUTE WARNING

Lowetide
July 15 2013 02:59PM

 

The Edmonton Oilers may not add to their current group of forwards for the coming season based on GM Craig MacTavish's words in his latest interview. If true, the bottom 6F look slightly better in some areas and the same or worse in others. How will coach Dallas Eakins get around it? Increased minutes for his top 6F, reliance on the wisdom of the pro scouting department, a winger from his AHL team and perhaps a Baron or two when things get tight.

TIME ON ICE 2012-13

The Oilers under Ralph Krueger employed a 4line rotation that saw Nail Yakupov (12:04) and Eric Belanger (10:47) get about the same even strength time on ice. More stark, the Hall-Nuge-Eberle line played about 15.5 minutes at even strength, about 2 full minutes less than league leaders like Steven Stamkos and Ilya Kovalchuk. Edmonton could easily push their 1line (and their 2line) during games and rotate the bottom 6F's less often. 

Why would they do that? Because in today's NHL any game that can offer points in the standings is vital, and because the Oilers have a massive gap between their 1line and their third and fourth lines.

How would they do that? There are designated times during each game where a television timeout allows the coach to re-set his lines. Coach Ralph Krueger often passed on the opportunity, I think that's one area where the new coach can have an immediate impact.

Other strategies to gain the edge? Offensive zone starts for the best available forwards and monster own zone faceoffs for Boyd Gordon (he's used to it--and good at it!) feeds into an area of strength for the hockey club.

Anything else? The really curious item for me last season was the PP TOI for the top guns. Hall, Nuge and Ebs averaged just 3 minutes a night, while 23 NHL forwards averaged 3.5 minutes per night or more with the man advantage. 

There are 25 NHL players who averaged more than 20 minutes a night on ice a year ago, 35 two years ago. The Oiler leader this past season was Sam Gagner at 19:24, with Hall--the best player on the team--averaging only 18.5 minutes a night. Increasing that number by 90 seconds or two minutes for Hall's line--with a similar increase for the 2line--should give Edmonton more firepower and make them less reliant on the bottom 6 forwards. 

If the Oilers can move some of those depth minutes to the front line of forwards, the results--shot differential, goals for and against--should head in a better direction. The keys are the Hall line, the Gagner line being much better than a year ago, and Boyd Gordon.

THE PRO SCOUTS

If the pro scouts (on both sides of the pond) got it right, Jesse Joensuu may end up being a hidden gem from the free agent frenzy. Signed to a 2-year contract with the Oilers, he's a physical player with skill and some ability

THE HOCKEY NEWS ON JOENSSU

The Hockey News offers an excellent thumbnail sketch on all NHL players and prospects and is a good starting point. Joensuu is exactly the type of player Edmonton used to acquire during the Sather era--a 2nd round pick who struggled with an NHL team not known for succesful talent development-- and hopefully Craig MacTavish inherited it from his old GM/coach.

EAKINS MEN

The Oilers acquired two of Eakins Marlies (Ryan Hamilton and Will Acton) and those two players along with some of the AHL Barons (Anton Lander, Mark Arcobello, Martin Marincin, Taylor Fedun along with recently signed Richard Bachman, Brad Hunt) provide some needed depth. The blueline is especially strong.

I think the Oilers will probably add some training camp invites or late summer ufa additions (guys like C's Marty Reasoner, David Steckel, Jerred Smithson, along with wingers like Brandon Yip, Chuck Kobasew, Peter Mueller) depending on cost and availability. The club up front is pretty exposed currently if they lose someone to injury and MacT will want to cover up the holes as best as he can before September and training camp.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

Photo Credit: -J. Nilsson Photography
Model: Daniela Marin

It has been less than a perfect summer so far, but the improvements in the roster are up the middle--G, D and C--along with added skill and experience in David Perron. A guess at opening night lineups might look like this (C-L-R):

  • Nuge-Hall-Eberle (Arcobello likely slotted in for injured Nuge)
  • Gagner-Perron-Yakupov
  • Gordon-Jones-Hemsky
  • Lander-Smyth-Jonessu
  • Smid-Petry
  • Ference-J Schultz
  • N Schultz-Belov/Larsen
  • Dubnyk/LaBarbera

Those top 2 lines need to play a larger portion of the game, that 3rd line has to be getting most of the available own zone starts, and the 4th line needs to be effective when called upon. The Oilers remain a rebuilding team in transition, but the summer moves have been reasonable and should improve the team next season.

If coach Eakins can grab 4 minutes in total time from the bottom 6 forwards and hand it to the top 6 forwards, the Oilers may be able to move up the standings enough to make the trade deadline meaningful.

A veteran left winger for that 3rd line wouldn't go amiss either.

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on Team 1260.
Avatar
#1 David S
July 15 2013, 04:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers
Daniela wrote:

hello,, is a great surprise see my picture in bikini here,, how was possible????? thank you

This CANNOT possibly be real.

But in case it is...

*Tucks shirt. Sits straight up. Sucks in gut.*

Helloooo Daniela!

Avatar
#2 Daniela
July 15 2013, 04:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

hello,, is a great surprise see my picture in bikini here,, how was possible????? thank you

Avatar
#3 toprightcorner
July 15 2013, 10:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
DSF wrote:

Mikael Grabovski

Adam Henrique

Luke Adam

Gutsav Nyqvist

Mikkael Boeker

Cody Franson

Joechen Hecht

Damien Brunner

Danny Cleary

Brendan Morrow

Manny Malhotra

Scott Gomez

Mason Raymond

Nik Antropov

Ronn Hainsey

Kyle Wellwood

Not an exhaustive list but I expect you could find a few upgrades.

These are the players you want to add?

Mikael Grabovski - decent, overated, not a 3rd line type of player, only on a 1 year contract

Adam Henrique - not a chance, NJ will never let him go

Luke Adam - big, but plays small, can't win a faceoff (44%), doesn't kill penalties only 75 NHL games

Gutsav Nyqvist - only 40 NHL games, is small and plays smaller (6 hits in career), centre who doesn't take faceoffs?

Mikkael Boedker - good all around player with size and plays well in all zones, RFA Phoenix won't let him go

Cody Franson - defenceman and you have only talked about forwards today, but good player, I would take him, RFA who didn't file for arbitration cause UFA in 2 years and looking for bigger longer term contract. Toronto won't let him go, they need him but with cap trouble would trade but would be expensive

Joechen Hecht - 36 years old, can't skate anymore, can't win a faceoff (41%), soft, he only played here 1 year for a reason

Damien Brunner - small, plays small, centre that doesn't take faceoffs, 27 year old rookie wants over $3 mill

Danny Cleary - 34 years old, past his prime, not coming back to Edmonton, right kind of player 5 years too late

Brendan Morrow - NOPE, already said will only sign with a contender

Manny Malhotra - Injury issues, Vancouver would not allow him to play, but I would give him a chance one 1 year for about $700k and no big loss if he can't play.

Scott Gomez - If you want a new whipping boy to replace Horcoff. Only positive attribute is he can win faceoffs

Mason Raymond - kills penalties, pain in the butt to play against, not very good in the room, terrible character, only produced when played with Sedins. Possibility but likely wants too much money. Would like to have him solely to have him on our team playing Vancouver. Probably do more harm than good for the team dynamics

Nik Antropov - can't win faceoffs (42%), past his prime, no longer productive, not a two-way player, big but plays small, does not come close to competing

Ron Hainsey - Another dman in your list of forwards, good penalty killer, plays soft, we have enough 4/5 dman, doesn't add anything we don't already have and is older and more expensive

Kyle Wellwood - small, plays small, doesn't kill penalties, another centreman who doesn't take faceoffs, very inconsistent, does not compete

So of those on your list, which you basically just went through the teams and plugged in centre's who you know their name and still got a couple defencemen mixed in when you have been talking about forwards.

So out of the 16 players you listed, only 7 would show any measurable improvement on our existing lineup (Gabrovski, Henrique, Boedker, Franson, Morrow, Maholtra and Raymond). 2 (Henrique and Boedker) are RFA's who's team won't give them up , 1 (Morrow) definitly won't come to Edmonton , 1 (Franson)is a defenceman who unless is Brent Burns 2.0 won't help our bottom 6 but even as a dman, RFA that is not available, 1 (Maholtra) has never been cleared to play by Vancouver. So that leave 2 players (Grabovski and Burrows) who could be considered worthwhile upgrades to fill the holes on our bottom 6 that fit the need of the desired replacements.

It is so simple to say lots of players are available that are way better than who we currently have but when you take 10 minutes to research it, the lists is actually very small.

Chance for the sake of change is not the way to go, unless you can significantly improve the person at that position by filling the need of the team then you don't take the chance.

Next time just don't copy and paste a list of UFA's and RFA's centres and tell everyone they are better options when you don't even look at their stats. you think it makes you look smart but it actually does the opposite.

Your credibility shot again!

Avatar
#4 Butters
July 15 2013, 07:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Wow, a deep discussion and worry about the Oilers' third and fourth lines. The Oilers are making progress.

Avatar
#5 Daniela
July 15 2013, 04:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

hello,, is a great surprise see my picture in bikini here,, how was possible????? thank you

Avatar
#7 Jerry
July 15 2013, 04:04PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Trade Kevin Lowe

Avatar
#9 Mikey
July 15 2013, 05:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Walter Sobchak wrote:

Whats scares me is The third and forth might be ok at home, they will get exposed on the road.

Jones belongs on the forth line and Hemsky is a top six talent....IF Hemsky is not traded do you want to decrease his value further by playing him less?

The other players minus Smyth should be in the AHL to start the season, or we just have the Hartikianen, Lander,Paajarvi model that has failed the last three years.

If they have stong starts in the AHL then you can bring them up, if the struggle at the NHL level.............. who's the top 5 draft pick this year?

If you think Gordon is a AHL player, your view and hockey opinon is garbage.

Avatar
#10 David S
July 15 2013, 05:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Lowetide wrote:

David, I'd like to get some clarity if possible. I've removed the image because Daniela seemed most unaware, and won't post it again until I'm certain she's okay with it. I retrieved it from a site that allows usage, but from her reaction it sounds like she was shocked.

Although I think it's a cool story (you knowing here and reading the blog--what are the odds???) I also want to be respectful to her.

I'M TELLNG WANYE!!!!!!!

BooOOooOOoOOooOOoOOOoo!!!!!

Avatar
#11 oliveoilers
July 15 2013, 09:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
DSF wrote:

Mikael Grabovski

Adam Henrique

Luke Adam

Gutsav Nyqvist

Mikkael Boeker

Cody Franson

Joechen Hecht

Damien Brunner

Danny Cleary

Brendan Morrow

Manny Malhotra

Scott Gomez

Mason Raymond

Nik Antropov

Ronn Hainsey

Kyle Wellwood

Not an exhaustive list but I expect you could find a few upgrades.

So basically the gist is if we had better players, we'd be a better team. Thanks, tips.

Avatar
#12 Gaz
July 15 2013, 10:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@DSF

Wellwood! Wellwood! Wellwood!

Avatar
#13 toprightcorner
July 15 2013, 10:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Kodiak wrote:

Hansen played the fourth most ES minutes for Vancouver + 78 min of PP. He obviously wasn't used in a 3rd/4th line capacity. Hansen had a 53% OZ start, Wellwood a 48% OZ start and Gordon a 33% OZ start. I sure hope those two would outscore him. Hansen was a +0.2 zone start/finish, Wellwood a +4.6 and Gordon a +8.8 and Gordon faced tougher opposition. If anyone of those three was taken to the cleaners it certainly WASN'T Gordon.

That's it? That's all you've got DSF? You're slipping.

More examples of verbal diarrhoea without doing the research.

Wow, Wellwood 55% on the dot, that sure is impressive when you only take 78 faceoffs!! Mike Brown was 71%, make him 4th line centre!!

You are correct though, there are lots of FA options available but as I already wrote in reply to your list, almost all of them are either unattainable or do not benefit the lineup. If you don't look at the stats before you make your suggestions then you are failing. I'm not even a stats guy and I don't make that rookie error!

Kodiak: How can DSF be slipping? I have yet to see him as someone who has anywhere to slip from!

Avatar
#14 oilbaron
July 15 2013, 03:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

"my money will be on the subtraction of Whitney and additions of Ferrence and Belov"

was thinking the same thing

Avatar
#15 Shredder
July 15 2013, 03:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I have to say that I liked Hall paired with Yakupov...they are slightly similar players although less than what most people would say.

I'd make my first line: Hall - Gagner - Yakupov

Then you add the grittiness of Perron (not to mention a good shot and pass) to the sublime passing and finishing of Ebs & Nuge (I see that being a natural compliment) I think you get a top notch line #2 (or 1B).

Top 6 looks real good, and I was really hoping Eakins would play them more.

Avatar
#17 The Soup Fascist
July 15 2013, 05:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Craig1981 wrote:

She was actually very excited about it. I told her to get back to you.

Not half as excited as some .......

P.S. I suddenly think I should increase my Spanish vocabulary, which currently consists of "dos cervezas por favor" .... and "Badges ?? .... we don't need no stinkin' badges (in a bad accent)"

Avatar
#18 Rama Lama
July 15 2013, 06:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
madjam wrote:

Gordon an upgrade on Paajarvi acceptable , and Perron an upgrade on Horcoff is reasonable expectations . I forsee a reasonable upgrade on Whitney and Potter .

Bottom six as shown is subpar in comparison to our other divisional rivalries , and defence better but still weak . Some still available like a Kobasew and/or Steckle might help marginally . Bottom six currently subpar in physical department to most and not very assertive in that regard either . Defence still lacks toughness to get us going in positive direction even though it is slightly better .

Weak enough that Nurse might be a bet to be pressed into action this year , as we still need that physical upgrade to challenge other divisional rivals for playoff s[pot . In a nutshell -on ice operational requirements above development in certain times . We see it all the time including our last 3 top junior picks , and each one did rather well considering .

If Nurse is pressed into the Oilers this season, I will lose all respect for the new management team!

He is a kid, a string bean kid, that by any reasonable measure is NOT ready for prime time. I can think of no one else except maybe LA with DD, where this has worked.

Let the kid play another year in junior and one in the AHL, add some muscle and then earn his spot.......anything else will not do him justice.

Avatar
#19 toprightcorner
July 15 2013, 08:01PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
DSF wrote:

No they're not.

And the solutions are sitting right in front of him...they're available for nothing and they're cheap.

Some statistics may say there are many better alternatives out there but I would suggest that about 30-40% are not better when it comes to work ethic, character compete level. Those we don't want.

Out of the remainder, many probably have not interest in coming to Edmonton either based on point in their career or lack of team success or geographically. Out of the remainder, many of those willing to come would likely have to be overpaid. When it comes to 4th line, an overpayment of $500 - $750k is a lot of money.

So you are now down to a name or possibly two and if these players are the top of the heap for that position, they are best suited to wait a while for the best offer to come in once teams step back and analyse their situation.

Basically, it is very easy to say there are a lot of options out there when in reality it is usually significantly less.

Avatar
#20 chibbs
July 15 2013, 08:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I don't think we are too far off of a playoff spot. I used my excel expertise (or lack thereof if the numbers are wrong) to crunch some numbers (which I'm sure exist on some other website I could not find). Here is what I see from the last season...

Won:19 Lost 29

Points out of a playoff spot: 10

Goals for:
Total(125), Avg(2.6),Median(2),Mode(2)

Goal against:
Total (134), Avg(2.79), Median(3), Mode(3)

Goal Differential:
Total (-9), Avg(-.19), Median(-1), Mode(-1)

Differential when we win:
Avg(2.63), Median(3), Mode (1)

Differential when we lose
Avg (2.03), Median (2), Mode(1)

One Goal Games.
Total: 15
OGG we won: 4
OGG we lost: 11
Regulation win (OGG): 2
Regulation lost (OGG): 4

Shootouts
SO won: 2
SO loss: 3

Overtime
OT win: 2
OT loss: 4

3 or more goals in a game:
won: 10
lost: 10

4 or more goals in a game:
won: 6
lost: 2

So if we can let in between .15 and .2 goals less a game (defense) and score between .15 and .2 goals for a game (offense), win a few close games without the need for SO or OT, I think we have a decent shot at the post season. Given that our young guns are a year older and our upgrade on defense, I don't think that's too far of a reach.

Also, I discovered that if you win in a shootout, the goal for does not count towards your team stats, but if you lose, the goal does count against you (if my exceling is correct).

FYI (so you don't have to google. no, not you the other guy): Median is what you get if you sort all the values and select the value at the middle of the list and mode is the number that occurs the most. so for 1,1,2,3,9 the median is 2 and the mode is 1.

Avatar
#21 The Soup Fascist
July 15 2013, 08:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
DSF wrote:

Good grief.

If Taylor Hall plays an additional 2 minutes per game, he will play an additional 164 minutes extra next season. (if he plays a full 82 game season)

At his current scoring rate of 3.16 P/60, that would yield an additional 8 points over the course of a season.

Let's assume, based on that, and ignoring he's taking ice time from someone else who could score, the Oilers score an additional 8 ES goals next season (best possible case).

That would mean, all else being equal, the Oilers would score 133GF and 134GA.

18 teams last season had a 5V5 F/A equal or better than 1.00.

Since PP success varies widely from season to season, expecting much progress in the standings based on more ice time for the top 6 at evens doesn't get you very far.

Are you not discounting his line mates who would also have higher points / 60 min than their comparatively pedestrian teammates, plodding along on the 3rd and 4th line?

I agree vastly improved 5 v 5 play is required by all lines, but more time for 93-4-14 (if they indeed play together) should be impactful.

Avatar
#22 toprightcorner
July 15 2013, 08:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
DSF wrote:

Do you think the Oilers could find an upgrade on Ben Eager in free agency?

If Eager plays to is potential and competes every night, I don't see a replacement in the remaining UFA's.

If we were talking about trades, I would love them to try and get Matt Martin from the Islanders. I believe he is a close facsimile of Kyle Clifford at a much lower price tag. Hits a ton, fights, skates, kills penalties and is a force down low.

Avatar
#23 DSF
July 15 2013, 08:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Gaz wrote:

Try and be productive. You've made it clear that MacT is failing - ok, I'll buy it. What do you suggest he does?

Get an actual 3rd line C.

Gordon is a nice player but, if your 3rd line C can't score a lick, you're pooched.

Get 2 actual 3rd line wingers.

Jones might score you a few but he is a defensive disaster.

Jesse Joensuu?

Give me a break.

Avatar
#24 book¡e
July 15 2013, 09:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
DSF wrote:

No, I took the best possible case.

Taylor Hall (and his linemates) scoring at Hall's established level.

The actual results are likely to be less.

You also ignored the possibility of goals against - those matter as well.

Avatar
#25 Maggie the Monkey
July 15 2013, 09:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@DSF

Jochen Hecht retired. I agree that he would have been a good addition, though.

Avatar
#26 Cheap Shot Charlie
July 15 2013, 10:36PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
DSF wrote:

Yes.

If the Oilers had better players they would be a better team.

Problem is, Oiler management doesn't seem to recognize better players.

Oh, how I miss the barrels of laughs when I don't stick around to read your crap!

I love you, man! *HUG*

Avatar
#27 toprightcorner
July 15 2013, 10:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Mean Machine wrote:

I'd like to move Gagner for Shawn Matthias and a 2nd round pick at this point.

Then you run Perron Matthias Yak as your second line.

Offer sheet clifford with the newly acquired

Matthias??

Before you consider him as a 2nd line centre, take a closer look at his stats over the last few years and you will quickly change your mind.

44% on the dot? Was 4th in total face offs taken and barely beat out Weiss who only played 17 games. He's a 4th liner at best. Never plays tough minutes and does not know how to use his size. Who cares if your 6'4" and 220 lbs if you average less than a hit a game and 25 pims a season. His career high is 24 points. only part time on 2nd PP unit and same as PK unit. none of that adds up to a 2nd line centre or a 3rd line centre.

Avatar
#28 OilersBrass
July 15 2013, 03:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Hey Lowetide, can you confirm or deny the rumors that Edmonton has been showing interest in trading for Phaneuf?

Avatar
#29 Beans
July 15 2013, 03:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Klefbom will be on ze team!

Avatar
#31 LinkfromHyrule
July 15 2013, 03:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

a lot of people seem to think that our bottom 6 is gonna doom our team next year, but honestly, I don't see it as quite that bad. Our 3rd line is actually pretty decent(provided Jones rebounds at least a bit). The fourth is definitely not pretty though, too many question marks for my liking

hopefully training camp will let some OKC guys breach the lineup

Avatar
#32 Walter Sobchak
July 15 2013, 03:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Whats scares me is The third and forth might be ok at home, they will get exposed on the road.

Jones belongs on the forth line and Hemsky is a top six talent....IF Hemsky is not traded do you want to decrease his value further by playing him less?

The other players minus Smyth should be in the AHL to start the season, or we just have the Hartikianen, Lander,Paajarvi model that has failed the last three years.

If they have stong starts in the AHL then you can bring them up, if the struggle at the NHL level.............. who's the top 5 draft pick this year?

Avatar
#33 OilersBrass
July 15 2013, 03:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Lowetide wrote:

I can't, sorry. If they are interested in him, Phaneuf could certainly help imo.

Wrote about him here

http://oilersnation.com/2012/3/13/el-kabong

and here

http://lowetide.ca/blog/2013/07/double-dion-kablammo-el-kabong.html

Lol "double Dion"

Good article on your site. I wouldn't mind Phaneuf on the Oilers.

Avatar
#34 northof51
July 15 2013, 03:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Thanks L/T for the post. I was trying to make the same point about Kruger but I don't have "any credentials" and "nobody would listen to me". With Kruger gone, the Oilers as a team are better.

That said, Kovalchuk (24:44 TOI/G), Stamkos (22:01), St. Louis (21:59), Giroux (21:10), E. Staal (20:59), Semin (20:56), Duchene (20:55), E. Kane (20:27), Eriksson (20:07), and J. Staal (20:06) all missed the playoffs last year. TBL and CAR were particularly dependent on a small group of forwards to carry the mail and while statistically (boxcars) they were up to the task, the rest of the team couldn't pick up the slack.

Simply put, the 3rd and 4th lines will have to be better next year.

Avatar
#35 russ99
July 15 2013, 03:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

LT - That Hockey News site is fantastic!

I've been looking for something like this for a long time.

I've been using a combination of hockeydb, TSN.ca, hockeysfuture and capgeek to hunt down player info, but this has most it in one place.

Props!

Avatar
#36 HardBoiledOil
July 15 2013, 03:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

so far this team is only marginally better on paper....hopefully our young gunz and DD will mature even more and pull us into a playoff spot.

Avatar
#37 oilbaron
July 15 2013, 03:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I really don't ever see Phaneuf coming here, particularly because he is so overpaid.

Really like the look of the current lineup, and I think there is already more depth here than most people realize. Between Mctavish, Eakins and Father Acton I'm pretty sure they're acutely aware of all the details, and (despite what MacT said last night) they might not even be done making moves yet.

I'm most concerned about Eakins coaching style, I just hope it gels with the kids and still lets them optimize their offense. If he can manage that... I can't wait for playoffs!

Avatar
#38 Smokey
July 15 2013, 03:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Having a three holes in your bottom six is going to mean three things. Weaker penalty killing, less of an ability to roll 4 lines wears down your top lines especially on back to backs, and less offensive making the Oilers as a whole easier to check.

Relying on Hamilton and Acton, Jones, Jonesuu, Lander to fill holes and compete at a level essential to making the playoffs is MacT's bad joke. Bottom six is no better then last year, and the whole forward group is smaller as a whole. Maybe he should not of announced the major over-hall day 1.

Avatar
#39 Will
July 15 2013, 03:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I know we improved last year in terms of standings, but after looking at the numbers, especially things like puck possession and shots, it seems the team may have actually regressed. I wonder how much of that was due to Krueger's coaching style?

He really would throw out some weird combinations with lots of time left, especially if he was trying to hold onto a lead, effectively allowing the opposition to bombard Dubnyk.

It's tough to talk about the team and how the new additions will work considering there is a completely new coach and system to consider.

What do you think will make the largest impact: A decent back-up to Dubnyk

The retooling of the forwards with additions like Perron, and Gordon

The development of young starts Schultz and Yakupov

The subtraction of Whitney and addition of Ferrence and Belov

The new coaching?

Obviously it is likely to be a combination of all of these things, as one greatly affects the other, however, my money will be on the subtraction of Whitney and additions of Ferrence and Belov. This is especially true if Klefbomb does what many of the Oiler rookies have done and exceeds expectations.

Avatar
#40 Craig1981
July 15 2013, 03:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Lowetide

I have to ask. Where did you get the photo of my Spanish teacher I had when I was in Ecuador from (yellow swimsuit)? I FBed her and she is dieing to know how it made its way to Canada

Avatar
#41 Will
July 15 2013, 03:58PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Shredder wrote:

I have to say that I liked Hall paired with Yakupov...they are slightly similar players although less than what most people would say.

I'd make my first line: Hall - Gagner - Yakupov

Then you add the grittiness of Perron (not to mention a good shot and pass) to the sublime passing and finishing of Ebs & Nuge (I see that being a natural compliment) I think you get a top notch line #2 (or 1B).

Top 6 looks real good, and I was really hoping Eakins would play them more.

I like this idea a lot. The only problem being Hall and Yak like to set up at the same spot, and Gagner is pretty abysmal down low as he can't seem to win puck battles along the wall. Neither can Nuge but he is such a good passer that the puck is usually on its way before a puck battle even begins.

Having said that, I imagine this is how the season will start out as Nuge likely won't return for a bit. I imagine if that Gagner line produces, they probably won't mess with it.

Getting excited to see what Perron can do on a higher flying team, as well I can't wait to see how much the defence has improved with new additions and the added benefit of a training camp.

Too early for predictions but it's nice to see a real live hockey team as oppose to a bunch of young talent.

Avatar
#42 OILERSORDEATH
July 15 2013, 04:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Shredder wrote:

I have to say that I liked Hall paired with Yakupov...they are slightly similar players although less than what most people would say.

I'd make my first line: Hall - Gagner - Yakupov

Then you add the grittiness of Perron (not to mention a good shot and pass) to the sublime passing and finishing of Ebs & Nuge (I see that being a natural compliment) I think you get a top notch line #2 (or 1B).

Top 6 looks real good, and I was really hoping Eakins would play them more.

@ Shredder Totally agree man, a nightmare for Dman to those two coming down

Avatar
#43 Norm
July 15 2013, 04:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Yet another attempt by Oilers ownership to sell another load of just be 'patient there is a plan'.What has been done so far is not enough to convince me to spend $400/500 to take my spouse to an Oiler game.

Mactavish is rookie lightweight of a Gm. That is now obvious.

Avatar
#44 Rocket
July 15 2013, 04:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

LT

I think TOI totals are really indicative of how this team will control the pace of play in games this coming season. The top lines (at least in the first half of the season), should really be playing more. Especially on the PP, the kids need more time.

Last year it was frustrating watching Krueger put Horcoff & Hemsky out there on the first unit PP at time. Hopefully Eakins fixes that. Anyway, special teams play doesn't concern me. 5on5 will really determine the fate of The Oilers.

More TOI for Hall please.

Avatar
#46 David S
July 15 2013, 04:27PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

*Hottest WDIAM babe EVER!

Avatar
#47 Craig1981
July 15 2013, 04:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@David S

Scouts honor, true as true.

Avatar
#49 15w40
July 15 2013, 04:55PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

So if the Oilers keep Hemsky around do they try for a 3rd semi scoring line and bring up one of the offensive guys like Rajala or Arcobello to play the other wing with Hemsky and Gordon?? on the 3rd line.

If your going to be small you might as well be a threat to score using MacT's thinking. Unless big Finn 2.0 has some offense to contribute on the 3rd line.

Looks like Lander is the default 4th line centre with the Smyth and Jones??

Maybe play Hemsky up the line-up with RNH and Hall to see if you can get his offensive #'s to balloon and increase the trade value?

There will be teams looking for offense in the 1st part of the hear and if Hemsky catches fire trade him then and slide Yak right in there.

Hemsky with Gagner didn't seem to be a good combination on the defensive side of centre.

Avatar
#50 Henry
July 15 2013, 04:57PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

It is starting to sound like Lowe/mact have pulled the chute on 2013-14 already. Looks we have been told by the corporate shill to lower expectations. Lovely.

Comments are closed for this article.