A WORK IN PROGRESS

Lowetide
August 11 2013 02:59PM

For most of the summer, Oiler fans have been watching Craig MacTavish "build up the middle." A club with so much talent on the wing, and in clear need of an upgrade at G, D and C, would seem to have an obvious 'To Do' list--and for the most part new GM Craig MacTavish has followed the script.

However, the center position remains about the same; with Boyd Gordon replacing Shawn Horcoff, the Edmonton Oilers remain a team without true NHL quality and depth at the position. If the Nuge can't play right away, the club will have to move Taylor Hall over from the wing, weakening an impressive left flank.

We've talked and talked about free agent solutions, but that arena of summer appears to be closed for the Oilers. How then will Craig MacTavish improve center ice? Perhaps we can learn something from his recent past.

PROBLEM SOLVING

So far during his time as GM, Craig MacTavish has procured talent in the following ways:

  • Signed NHL free agents (Ference, Gordon, LaBarbera, Joensuu)
  • Signed his own free agents (Jones)
  • Signed minor league free agents (Ryan Hamilton, Richard Bachman, Will Acton)
  • Signed college free agents (C Andrew Miller)
  • Signed free agents from pro league outside the NHL (Anton Belov, Denis Grebseshkov from the KHL)
  • Traded a veteran (Horcoff) for a fringe NHLer (Larsen) and a pick much later this century
  • Traded a young, less established NHLer (Paajarvi) for a young, more established NHLer (Perron)

If we're guessing about how MacT will address center--and I'm pretty sure he's going to at some point, it may be in-season--and we believe he's done in free agency, it means a trade of some sort.

Question: what if MacT uses the Perron-Paajarvi deal as a template? What if he dealt Anton Lander and a high end prospect (Marincin?) or dealt Lander with next year's 1st round selection? I think the idea of acquiring a solid NHL center becomes much easier using the trade made with St. Louis as a guide.

CENTER AVAILABLE?

The first thing we need to do is identify some teams that are unlikely to contend for the playoffs in 2013-14 or have tremendous depth at the center position. Even at this early stage, it's very unlikely the Calgary Flames, Florida Panthers, New Jersey Devils and Buffalo Sabres will be playoff contenders. Looking at their rosters, we  can come up with an interesting list of potential C's for the Oilers based on a 'Lander and a pick/prospect' return. Other names below may be part of a crowded group, with a player like Lander being a better fit (Lander can be sent to the AHL without waivers).

  1. Mikael Backlund, Calgary: There are some serious problems in suggesting Backlund, not the least of which is that a Flames-Oilers pick happens once a lifetime and Steve Staios is the trivia answer for the 2000's. The other problem is that Backlund is a wildly underrated hockey player (Kent Wilson has documented this brilliantly at Flames Nation). However, I think there's some evidence the Flames don't know what they're doing and I'm pretty certain MacT would appreciate the skills a Backlund offers. The price might be dear, but the player is an outstanding fit for the Oilers.
  2. Shawn Matthias, Florida: I actually like a free agent Panther better (Peter Mueller) but Matthias has some things that make him attractive too. The Panthers have Marcel Goc as well, but I think he's a little long in the tooth to be a legit Oiler target. Matthias has size and good 2-way skills, he is usually solid in the faceoff circle but was poor this season.
  3. John Mitchell, Colorado: The Avs have a stunning depth chart at center, with Mitchell possibly being the odd man out. He blossomed late, and isn't a speed demon, but would be a very nice addition to the current depth chart.
  4. Brian Boyle, Rangers: Big man is being pushed out by insane depth in Manhattan, and could be available sometime this season (when all are signed and straightened away in NYC).

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

I don't really believe Craig MacTavish would do so much heavy work on defense and so little at center--both badly needing improved quality and depth and he's addressed one and not the other.

My feeling is that it's not for a lack of trying and we may see something break before October. Something similar to the Paajarvi and a 2nd deal for Perron, possibly involving one of the many prospect defenders.

We wait.

(Lander photo by Rob Ferguson. All rights reserved).

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on TSN 1260.
Avatar
#51 Gaz
August 11 2013, 10:35PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@uks ya

I'm of the opinion that you have one rookie/developing player in regular rotation in the C position, and hold another rookie as the 5th C.

RNH is brilliant, but sorry folks, he's a developing C in my books. Under that assumption, the Oilers need another veteran C.

Avatar
#52 Romulus' Apotheosis
August 11 2013, 10:43PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
DSF wrote:

He's already waited months.

If he doesn't address the C depth issue before the season starts, is he any different than Tambellini?

Jim Nill identified lack of centre depth on the Stars as a major problem and solved it in ONE DAY.

Most hockey observers differentiate between time during season and time in the off-season. I wonder why?

Avatar
#53 CaptainLander
August 12 2013, 08:45AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I think Steckel could end up an Oiler, but I still think Mac T will attempt to acquire a 3/4 center via Hemmer trade. Steckel is a filler not a 3-5 year solution. I agree that a solid 24-26 year old center with a good contract is what the Oil need. Finding one that a team is willing to trade is another story.

I found exactly zero. Likely best best is to find the fringe NHLer that has a break out year. No problem.

Avatar
#54 Lochenzo
August 12 2013, 09:20AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I've always liked the idea of bringing in Brian Boyle. I'm surprised that the Rangers would not be interested in replacing Gaborik's skill with somebody like Hemsky.

I think things are on hold in NY with AV settling in as the new coach. After training camp, we'll know where things fall and maybe Boyle become available if Brad Richards looks real good.

Avatar
#56 Romulus' Apotheosis
August 11 2013, 08:20PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I hate this idea.

I get the logic of it. But with FA options out there both high (Grabo) and low (Steckel) and in-between (Mueller), it sure seems like a lot to give up for what could be had for just $$$.

I wish that Finn Count-Kola was available. That would have been sweet!

Avatar
#57 Racki
August 11 2013, 08:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers
mike wrote:

The Oilers would be giving up more than Hemsky to get a guy like Stastny. Goodbye to that first round pick. And perhaps kiss Marincin goodbye also.Still a trade I like.Even at that cost.

I don't agree at all. I think Stastny's stock has severely dropped, especially after the big pay day. I'm not sure the Avs would give him up for Hemsky or not, as I'm not sure how well that addresses their needs, but there is no way I'd be giving them Hemsky + 1st + prospect. Huge contract right now.. could become a UFA.. who wants to throw away 2 assets + a vet for that?

That said, I would do Hemsky for Stastny swap if Avs would, as that would help the Oil right now.

Avatar
#58 Romulus' Apotheosis
August 11 2013, 08:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
Lowetide wrote:

Well, if you're team building and attempting to hurry up the process then trading looks like the only option left this summer.

I understand there are free agents still out there but as DSF pointed out above chances are these players either have other options they prefer or the Oilers aren't interested for cap reasons (or don't like the specific player for their specific situation).

I think the trade route makes real sense if they can get someone who can slide up and down the depth chart and also play in several situations.

That kid in Calgary would be a very nice fit.

Oh. I like the players you picked out just fine. I just don't like the cost.

One thing you didn't explore that seems possible based on your list of MacT moves is finding a C from another pro-league.

The Count-Kola idea was very interesting. Damn his two year contract!

The Belov model: find another Count-Kola type... maybe we should be mining other leagues for FA and players with opt-out clauses. Get Musil and the Finn scout to hustle.

The Grebs model: bring Thoresen back?

Avatar
#60 michael
August 11 2013, 09:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

PS has an expiring contract that is something to keep in mind. His dads blarp last year also to keep in mind.

Would a trade for Nick Shultz and a prospect be more likely? Considering Colorado defence. They could use a veteran. And an expiring contract in NS. I would think PS would certainly look good lined up with Hemsky and Jones . Means you move Gordon down but we all coud lie with that. Why not create a 3rd scoring line and add center depth at the same time. We got so many dmen right now that NS would not be missed.He is a 4-5 guy. Got plenty of those.

Lowetide I see that Ryan Whitney remains unsigned. Seems that what we saw this past 2 years from Whitney others also saw. I see Europe in his future. Real soon.

Avatar
#62 Uks Ya
August 11 2013, 10:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
BOOM! wrote:

we add grabo and roll 3 lines...

November and so on.....

Hall-Nugent-Hopkins-Eberle*** Perron-Gagner-Yakupov*** Jones-Grabovski-Hemsky ** Smyth-Gordon- Brown**

Joensuu is Healthy scratch for now but most likely steal Jones or Smyths spot! :)

Lander also waits for 1of our fragile centermen to go down

also liking the possibility Grabo out played Gagner and it looked ...

**Hall-Nuge-Ebz** **Perron-Grabovski-Yakupov** **Smyth-Gagner-Hemsky** **Jones-Gordon-Brown**

**Joensuu, Lander**

but.......im excited to see Perron play with Gagner and Yakupov..

Gagner and Perron used to battle hard , they came into the NHL same year and were kinda rivals.....sometimes your enemys turn your best friend...I think we have a strong case here

Avatar
#63 fuzzy muppet
August 12 2013, 08:41AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Nothings happening until training camp when the waiver wire may bring some help.

Im still pretty meh on what MacT has done. Sure he brought in a lot of bodies, but are any of them actual improvements on what they had? Perron is the only guy thats an improvement over the player he is replacing.

Im hoping there's something still coming when camps open and the cap limit becomes a more pressing issue.

Avatar
#64 Aitch
August 12 2013, 10:16AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

Lowetide, I'm usually with ya, but once I read package Lander and a 1st to fix the Centre issue, I tuned out. There's no way we should be dumping a future first rounder (not to mention other aspects) for a 4th line Centre. Way to expensive.

Avatar
#65 madjam
August 13 2013, 06:36AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
2004Z06 wrote:

Cracks me up that most of you still see Gagner as a legit #2C. What we need is to get a natural#2C that forces Gagner out to the wing. Stastny for Hemsky works!

Ye of such little Gagner faith as second center may be pleasantly surprised as he has huge breakout year with Perron and the likes of Yakupov . The next M. St.Louis in the makings perhaps emerging ?

Avatar
#66 The_CWD_GarbageMan
August 13 2013, 08:12AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

The biggest factor this year, just like the last few years is our compete level. Every time we are supposed to make the jump to the next stage in the club's development there seems to be one or two teams that we should be better than on paper that overtake us. And it's because of work ethic.

Mac T has made a few decent moves to get us some "character" guys who's track record shows that they can compete, but (Sorry for the baseball reference) as the Jays have shown, you can have a great roster, but if the chemistry and the competitive nature is not consistent, those great names aren't going to take you anywhere.

If Eakins can get these guys to compete on a nightly basis and the players (namely our burgeoning core) buy in, then this could make for an interesting year. If not we are going to be having the same discussion about what guys we need who could turn the tide for us next year.

Avatar
#67 Oilcity
August 13 2013, 11:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I've brought up the idea of Brian boyle for a long time now.. Massive 4th line centre with great pk and face-off stats. He brings size and is just what the oilers need. They need to do this. If thinking either a pick or prospect. Not hemsky because rangers are high on cap hit As it is

Comments are closed for this article.