HARD TARGET SEARCH: BRIAN CAMPBELL

Lowetide
January 30 2014 08:26AM

 

In our continuing look at possible solutions to the Oilers defensive woes, our attention turns to sunny Florida and the Miami entry, the Panthers. Brian Campbell's career as a journeyman obscures his status as a top flight defenseman who has driven results for a long period of time. Now deep into his career, can Brian Campbell help the Oilers? 

TRADES

Brian Campbell has been around a long damn time. Drafted by Buffalo in 1997, he arrived as a regular in 2002 and began delivering terrific offensive seasons after the first lockout. He was sent to San Jose as a rental at the 2008 deadline and signed in Chicago that summer. Wins Stanley, 'Hawks can't afford him anymore, ship him to Florida 2011 summer. 

Campbell's offense has been fairly consistent over the years (he's had a down year or two, as well) and fans who have seen him know exactly what to expect: a fine puck moving defenseman who can help a power play, a defender who can be exposed and a man who once won the Lady Byng. 

That isn't the ideal resume for an Edmonton Oiler defenseman. Oiler fans like their blue tough and physical, and things like hits and blocked shots are very important to the Rexall fan. However, the math tells us winning games is a lot about possession and Campbell's been a killer in this regard for eons. 

THE VOLLMAN SLEDGEHAMMER

This year's sledgehammer shows Campbell in his natural habitat (as you'll see in a minute). He gets a zone start pus (52%) but he also plays tough opposition—and even at 34, having an average season offensively—he still delivers a fine blue bubble. That's a valuable player. 

This is the shortened season, Campbell had even more of a zone start push but once again faced tough opposition. Blue bubble, just as sure as sunrise.  

Crazy, isn't it? It's like he's born to do this: get the zone start push, play tough opponents and flourish! Campbell's consistency flies in the face of what we think of him as a player, but there he is in all his incredibly consistent glory. Sure as sunrise. 

Here's his numbers on a line, and isn't the consistency of the Corsi For % exceptional? Man, that's the good stuff right there. Three years in a row, just rolling these things out like they're nothing. Lordy. Breathtaking. 

HIS CONTRACT IS STUPID

Yes. Campbell has two more years after this one (at $7,142,875!!!!) and that's a consideration. However, that also knocks some off the asset price to acquire him and Campbell isn't 40 (he's 35 in May). 

He's also averaging 27:51 a game (!!!) this year and could serve as an outstanding mentor to young puck movers like Justin Schultz. 

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

There  are some real concerns with Campbell. He's an older player, the contract number is high and he's bringing many elements the Oilers already have in a guy like Schultz the younger. 

Still, those possession stats don't lie, he could mentor J Schultz and the dollars will be easier to endure with the new cap (and it's only two seasons). I think Campbell is a player worth considering.  

Up next: a brilliant option closer to home. 

C2a6955161684b5e3189319acfa5ebe4
Lowetide has been one of the Oilogosphere's shining lights for over a century. You can check him out here at OilersNation and at lowetide.ca. He is also the host of Lowdown with Lowetide weekday mornings 10-noon on TSN 1260.
Avatar
#1 Freewheeling Freddie
January 30 2014, 09:54AM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

Campbell overpaid overrated. Dont ever do it mac T

Avatar
#2 Sisyphys
January 30 2014, 09:14AM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Although I think its good to start looking at D options, given how our entire d corps gets blown up this off-season, I think we're getting ahead of ourselves.

What we really need to be asking is--why would any decent veteran dman want to come to Edmonton to play? Put yourself in their shoes--yes, if they're traded here they don't have a choice, but we cant afford to trade for all the d slots we're going to need to fill. In fact, we can trade for about one dman, and that's it. The rest will need to come via free agency. Assuming, of course, we wont touch our young studs.

So lets say we don't put any of the young guys up on the block. How are we supposed to convince anyone to come here? Look at how we play, at the dysfunction, at the forwards who wont be defensively responsible, etc. I'm just thinking its going to be very, very hard to get any FA's who are worth a thing to sign here.

Vote me down all you want, but I'm still on the trade a big name player kick. Hall, RNH, or Eberle. To get back a solid dman to help mentor our youngsters on D, to help them hopefully not fester and flail all the way to another bottom finish next year

Avatar
#3 Rama Lama
January 30 2014, 10:32AM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers

Hold it stop everyone.......have we all lost our minds here??

Yes Brian Campbell is the right size for our team and with no real defensive game, he would be a natural fit for this team but even us OIlers fans have some standards.

For anyone to consider this as an option, please check yourself into a mental clinic, you are part of the problem, not part of the solution. We are looking for size, meaness, and the ability to play defence, non of which BC has on his resume.

Please people do NOT give KLowe and more stupid ideas!

LT.......what have you been smoking?

Avatar
#4 pelhem grenville
January 30 2014, 08:48AM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

...that's sooooooo much money for a 35 year old for still waaaaaay too long no?

Avatar
#5 Sliderule
January 30 2014, 08:43AM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Do we need another small puck mover? This time with a big contract. The oilers need D that can break the cycle. The sharks showed us we don't have that.

Avatar
#6 Ricky's Jalapeno Chips
January 30 2014, 09:44AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

5'10" 190 lbs. Age 34 Cap Hit $7.14 million Really, you would consider this? Opportunity cost…

Avatar
#7 Citizen David
January 30 2014, 10:30AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Campbell would be number one on my list. If we get him that's a major win.

Avatar
#8 Will
January 30 2014, 10:41AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
fasteddy wrote:

Give your head a shake....Yandle is softer than butter, on the downside, and one dimensional. I'd take him, but not for one of the kids.

I'm also a huge Yandle fan. I'm not really sure about his physical play, but he seems like the most expendable one on a Yotes team staked with better and cheaper options.

Again, my big hope is that Callahan goes to free agency and out of spite (and for lots of money) sings here making one of our RW expendable and giving the top 6 some much needed two way play and grit. With that expendable right wing, maybe they can get Yandle. Then finally go out and grab Orpik if he doesn't get resigned.

Hall - Nuge - Ebs

Perron - Gags - Callahan

That looks pretty respectable, especially because Perron is pretty solid defensively.

On the back end you'd be able to keep our deep D prospect pool developing and coming into the line up when ready, or being pieces in further trades. Petry is no slouch in the size department and some nights plays big and mean, others not so much.

Yandle - Petry

Orpiks - J Schultz

Belov - Marincin

Nurse / Klefbomb / Fedune

Avatar
#9 Harry
January 30 2014, 01:22PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Rama Lama wrote:

Hold it stop everyone.......have we all lost our minds here??

Yes Brian Campbell is the right size for our team and with no real defensive game, he would be a natural fit for this team but even us OIlers fans have some standards.

For anyone to consider this as an option, please check yourself into a mental clinic, you are part of the problem, not part of the solution. We are looking for size, meaness, and the ability to play defence, non of which BC has on his resume.

Please people do NOT give KLowe and more stupid ideas!

LT.......what have you been smoking?

Some people just never learn. 5'10" 190 is just too damn small no matter how you look at it. I could see if we already had big dmen buy we dont.

What is it going to take for people to realize that Edm needs size?

Avatar
#10 Mikey
January 30 2014, 09:13AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
superhall wrote:

I don't think we gotta look to much for d. We have a lot of depth coming in the system I think we need a solid number one just to help bring the young d into to the nhl. Not sure if Brian Campbell fits that role. Lowetide?

I would say he defiantly fills that role. The oilers need mentor ship, which they could have used 3 years ago. Let's face it the oilers won't win the cup in the next 3 years. There is just no way. So let's spend some money and get someone in here who can teach.

Not only could he help Schultz, but Marincin could also benefit from him. Who cares about his cap hit, we need a #1 D.

Avatar
#11 OF17
January 30 2014, 10:07AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

I don't see why Florida would trade him. They feel just as much pressure as we do to make the playoffs, and they really don't have much besides Campbell to carry the defensive load. Add to that the fact that Campbell's contract is actually a positive for them in helping them reach the floor, and that Tallon has consistently sung Campbell's praises across two separate organizations, and the Oilers would be in tough to acquire him.

What do we have to offer? Gagner +? Can't see Florida going for that. I'd think about a Klefbom for Campbell trade, but I'm not sure that they would, and even then, that's giving up a young, promising asset for 2 years of Campbell. The 1st rounder is too much.

I'd absolutely love to see Campbell as an Oiler, absolutely love it, but I don't see a way to make it happen.

Avatar
#12 Mikey
January 30 2014, 10:45AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
Rama Lama wrote:

Hold it stop everyone.......have we all lost our minds here??

Yes Brian Campbell is the right size for our team and with no real defensive game, he would be a natural fit for this team but even us OIlers fans have some standards.

For anyone to consider this as an option, please check yourself into a mental clinic, you are part of the problem, not part of the solution. We are looking for size, meaness, and the ability to play defence, non of which BC has on his resume.

Please people do NOT give KLowe and more stupid ideas!

LT.......what have you been smoking?

I can agree Brian is small and isn't mean but he can play some D. Right now he is playing with Tom Gilbert (who is tied for team lead in points at an amazing 24) and is only -1 on a team that has only scored 129 goals (good for 26th)

Also he is a realistic player Edm could acquire.

Avatar
#13 superhall
January 30 2014, 08:58AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
freelancer wrote:

I would definitely agree that he is worth a long look. I think I would be more effective if we could acquire him AND an additional top 4 guy. If we're looking for guys who can "fix" the Oilers blue line, I don't see him doing that alone.

I don't think we gotta look to much for d. We have a lot of depth coming in the system I think we need a solid number one just to help bring the young d into to the nhl. Not sure if Brian Campbell fits that role. Lowetide?

Avatar
#14 Al Low
January 30 2014, 09:01AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Campbell could be a good option until a guy like Nurse is ready to be the 1st pairing guy we are all projecting him to be.

Avatar
#15 fasteddy
January 30 2014, 10:32AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

@Taylor Gang

Give your head a shake....Yandle is softer than butter, on the downside, and one dimensional. I'd take him, but not for one of the kids.

Avatar
#16 superhall
January 30 2014, 08:48AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
41
cheers
Ben Scrivens wrote:

Ben Scrivens

I also Ben Scrivens

Avatar
#17 freelancer
January 30 2014, 08:52AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

I would definitely agree that he is worth a long look. I think I would be more effective if we could acquire him AND an additional top 4 guy. If we're looking for guys who can "fix" the Oilers blue line, I don't see him doing that alone.

Avatar
#18 ColourMeImpressed
January 30 2014, 09:10AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
25
cheers

How could you possibly think the Oilers need help on the blue, after last night's result?

Avatar
#19 Sisyphys
January 30 2014, 09:44AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

@freelancer

We tried the big bag of money approach. With a guy like Hendricks, no less. He passed. A 4th line grinder passed on a big bag of money so he wouldn't have to come here. Granted, he ended up getting traded her anyways, but the point is...I'm not sure big bags of money are going to do it for guys who may be getting offered decent sized bags of money from other teams

Avatar
#20 YEGFan
January 30 2014, 10:14AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers
Ricky's Jalapeno Chips wrote:

5'10" 190 lbs. Age 34 Cap Hit $7.14 million Really, you would consider this? Opportunity cost…

So the FACT that he is a successful and effective number one defenseman in the NHL is less important than his size? The cap hit is what makes him a legitimate possibility. He'd be considered one of the leagues most valuable assets at a 5-6M cap hit.

Avatar
#21 The Last Big Bear
January 30 2014, 11:19AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Look at the top 10 Corsi Rel defencemen in the NHL.

Oh look, Martin Marincin leads the league. As you would expect for any reasonable measure of defenceman ability.

Followed in a close second by Jean-Phillipe Cote. And rounding out the top-10 are perennial Norris candidates like Anton Strahlman, Matt Donovan, James Wisniewski, and Jake Muzzin.

How can anyone can claim with a straight face that we should be using Corsi numbers to evaluate defencemen? There are maybe 4 guys in the top-30 Corsi defencemen who would be on a list of the top-30 actual defencemen. That's literally what picking a random list of 30 defencemen would produce. If we're using Corsi as a measuring stick for defencemen, then this series is unnecessary, as the Oilers already have two guys who are currently performing as #1 defenders, in Marincin and Larsen, both top-30 in the league.

I'm all on board with using Corsi measures to evaluate forwards. And I totally feel the nations-network love for underrated Corsi stars like Mikael Backlund and Mikhail Grabovski.

But Corsi numbers do not correlate with defenceman performance. You might expect them to, just like you might expect blocked shots, or on-ice Sv% to be reflective of a defenceman's ability. But just like those other numbers, Corsi measures bear no relation to a player's performance as a defender.

Corsi numbers mean about as much in evaluating defencemen as they do in evaluating goalies. If you think I'm kidding, look up the top Corsi goalies in the NHL, and tell me that list is worse than the top Corsi defencemen.

.

Avatar
#22 Fish
January 30 2014, 11:37AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

You missed spelled Brian Campbell, in the sentence Brian Campbell should be a consideration. Its spelled, Kulikov.

Avatar
#23 Rama Lama
January 30 2014, 12:30PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Citizen David wrote:

Correction we're looking for a top pairing defenceman that might be attainable. See Campbell.

Do you really want another small, non-physical, defenceman? I would contend we have enough of these types of players?

Avatar
#24 Citizen David
January 30 2014, 12:57PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Rama Lama wrote:

Do you really want another small, non-physical, defenceman? I would contend we have enough of these types of players?

I want a top pairing defenseman. Which Brian Campbell is. We get one of those it pushes everyone down a level of competition they face. I don't care one bit about the size of players just if they can play and Campbell can play.

BTW our prospects that are starting to knock on the door (or in Marincin's case, kick it down) are towers. Size on the back end will not be a problem much longer.

Besides it isn't even size but skill and compete level. Nik Lindstrom wasn't a bull dog, wasn't big but I would take a 35 year old Lindstrom on our team in a second regardless our our "size"

We need better players not bigger players. See Brian Campbell.

Avatar
#25 Rama Lama
January 30 2014, 01:14PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Citizen David wrote:

I want a top pairing defenseman. Which Brian Campbell is. We get one of those it pushes everyone down a level of competition they face. I don't care one bit about the size of players just if they can play and Campbell can play.

BTW our prospects that are starting to knock on the door (or in Marincin's case, kick it down) are towers. Size on the back end will not be a problem much longer.

Besides it isn't even size but skill and compete level. Nik Lindstrom wasn't a bull dog, wasn't big but I would take a 35 year old Lindstrom on our team in a second regardless our our "size"

We need better players not bigger players. See Brian Campbell.

You must be talking about a different Nick Lidstrom.......I remember him being over 6'2" ( 210 lbs) not 5'8' (175 lbs) like BC is.

Why do fans like you believe you cant get size and skill in the same package? I for one do not want anymore small, physically incapable defencemen on our team. We play in a different division where size matters.......unlike the eastern conferences.

Mac T already found the smallest defenceman available in Ference and you want more.........no wonder this team is spinning it's wheels!!

Avatar
#26 Mikey
January 30 2014, 01:45PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
Ricky's Jalapeno Chips wrote:

The Oil are (generally) small and easy to play against. Last night's game was a good example. In my opinion (I go to a lot of games) they need to get bigger and harder to play against, i.e. grittier. His cap hit is 7.14 for two more years. It would probably take a lot of good assets (players/picks) to get him.

In my opinion, he is too small, too expensive to acquire, and takes up to much cap space ($2.14 million for two more years). The Oil cannot compete with bigger, "heavier" teams. I would favour one or two cheaper, tougher d-men to be the transition until some of the younger guys in the pipeline are here and settled into important roles. Last night was a good sample of how easy the Oil are to play against. I don't think Brian Campbell will help us compete with L.A., St. Louis, Anaheim, etc. I agree that Campbell is a valuable asset, but, all things considered, he is not what we need.

How do you know he is expensive to acquire? So you would rather have more 5-7 Dmen instead of a true #1? We tried that, it didn't work.

Avatar
#27 RDS
January 30 2014, 08:42AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
49
cheers

If it means the Oilers won't give up 0.983333 shots per minute, then lets get him!

Avatar
#28 Mikey
January 30 2014, 08:49AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Hey LT, what do you think the asking price would be?

Avatar
#29 vetinari
January 30 2014, 09:27AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

I don't think that Campbell's asking price would be too steep-- likely a couple of prospects and/or a pick? Everyone hates his contract but with the cap projected to go up, it won't feel as bad of a hit over the next two years.

Also, look at it this way-- if Hemsky walks or gets traded, Campbell is only about $1.6M more per season than Hemmer's current contract and we need to rebalance the roster to get some help on the blueline. Ideally, we'd still have a Fistric or Matt Greene type of player on the backend but those ships have sailed.

Avatar
#30 big slick
January 30 2014, 09:44AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

With floor being and issue would Hemsky for Campbell work? They could keep some of his salary too.

Avatar
#31 Taylor Gang
January 30 2014, 10:06AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

If we strike out on the big fish defenseman in the summer, I say what the heck?

A stop gap is EXACTLY what this team needs. Nurse is at least a year from being an NHL regular, and probably 4 years away from being a top 2 stud. Might as well teach the kids how to win before Nurse and Klefbom show up.

Avatar
#32 Mikey
January 30 2014, 10:20AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
Sisyphys wrote:

We tried the big bag of money approach. With a guy like Hendricks, no less. He passed. A 4th line grinder passed on a big bag of money so he wouldn't have to come here. Granted, he ended up getting traded her anyways, but the point is...I'm not sure big bags of money are going to do it for guys who may be getting offered decent sized bags of money from other teams

Or he passed so he could stay in a city he knows and is familiar with, where his wife and kids live and go to school. You picked a very poor example.

Avatar
#33 wintoon
January 30 2014, 10:50AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

This may fall within the parameters of "beggars can't be overly choosy". The Oilers need a player to fill the mentorship role because it is obvious our Assistant Coach (Smith) is incapable of providing this. Furthermore, with his consistent blue bubble, he should be able to provide good service to our top offensive players. This, in itself, would be a huge uptick. Providing the price is doable, this is a hard target worth pursuing.

Avatar
#34 Citizen David
January 30 2014, 11:29AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Rama Lama wrote:

Hold it stop everyone.......have we all lost our minds here??

Yes Brian Campbell is the right size for our team and with no real defensive game, he would be a natural fit for this team but even us OIlers fans have some standards.

For anyone to consider this as an option, please check yourself into a mental clinic, you are part of the problem, not part of the solution. We are looking for size, meaness, and the ability to play defence, non of which BC has on his resume.

Please people do NOT give KLowe and more stupid ideas!

LT.......what have you been smoking?

Correction we're looking for a top pairing defenceman that might be attainable. See Campbell.

Avatar
#35 The Last Big Bear
January 30 2014, 12:17PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
@Oilanderp wrote:

Try 5v5 Corsi Rel QoC (Relative Corsi Quality of Competition), which is the average Relative Corsi of opposing players, weighted by head-to-head ice time.

THIS¹ list might look a little more like what you would expect to see.

If I were looking for a #1 d-man I would take that list I linked to and scroll down and look hard at guys with more than 18 minutes of 5v5 ice-time. I haven't done it but I would imagine it would be a list to drool over.

EDIT: Now that I think of it I wonder how LT generated his list of hopefuls? Probably something similar before crossing off the names that have no chance to be traded or would cost to much to acquire.

That has nothing to do with a defender's Corsi, it tells you the Corsi of the players he's playing against.

Corsi Rel QoC tells you how the coach chooses to deploy a player, and who he matches the player up against. And as I said before, I think Corsi is a good way of evaluating forwards, so I think it is a relatvely accurate overall representation of the calibre of a player's opponents.

And by choosing that stat as best representing a defenceman's ability, you are explicitly stating that a coach's subjective judgement is the best metric for evaluating defenceman ability.

Which I agree with.

And reiterate that it has nothing to do with the corsi of the defenceman in question.

Avatar
#36 Rama Lama
January 30 2014, 01:28PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
Ricky's Jalapeno Chips wrote:

The Oil are (generally) small and easy to play against. Last night's game was a good example. In my opinion (I go to a lot of games) they need to get bigger and harder to play against, i.e. grittier. His cap hit is 7.14 for two more years. It would probably take a lot of good assets (players/picks) to get him.

In my opinion, he is too small, too expensive to acquire, and takes up to much cap space ($2.14 million for two more years). The Oil cannot compete with bigger, "heavier" teams. I would favour one or two cheaper, tougher d-men to be the transition until some of the younger guys in the pipeline are here and settled into important roles. Last night was a good sample of how easy the Oil are to play against. I don't think Brian Campbell will help us compete with L.A., St. Louis, Anaheim, etc. I agree that Campbell is a valuable asset, but, all things considered, he is not what we need.

Thank You........well said.

Avatar
#37 @Oilanderp
January 30 2014, 01:35PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
The Last Big Bear wrote:

That has nothing to do with a defender's Corsi, it tells you the Corsi of the players he's playing against.

Corsi Rel QoC tells you how the coach chooses to deploy a player, and who he matches the player up against. And as I said before, I think Corsi is a good way of evaluating forwards, so I think it is a relatvely accurate overall representation of the calibre of a player's opponents.

And by choosing that stat as best representing a defenceman's ability, you are explicitly stating that a coach's subjective judgement is the best metric for evaluating defenceman ability.

Which I agree with.

And reiterate that it has nothing to do with the corsi of the defenceman in question.

Perhaps if we look closely at the Vollman charts above we can get a sense as to what it is telling us and if that is useful at all in judging a defenseman.

As I see it, there are 4 elements of information being provided:
1. The vertical axis is CorsiRelQoC, so the closer to the top of the graph the player's bubble is, the more he is playing against tough competition.
2. The horizontal axis is OffZoneStart%, which is a measure of where the player is being used. The further right on the chart the more that player is being used in offensive situations.
3. The colour of the bubble can be CorsiOn (which is straight up Corsi (shots attempted by his team when that player is on the ice)), or CorsiRel(which is just shot attempt differential). In either case, the bluer the bubble, the more shot attempts his team is getting while he is on the ice.
4. The size of the bubble is TOI, which is just time on ice (per game). The larger the bubble the more time that player is on the ice.

To summarize, looking at the Vollman charts we can instantly tell four things:
1. quality of competition the d-man faces
2. where the coach uses the d-man (OZ or DZ)
3. whether or not the d-man is getting outshot
4. how much the d-man plays (TOI)

Would you agree that these 4 things are good things to look at when judging a defenceman? If not, what would you add or remove from this list?

Avatar
#38 Heshoothescores
January 30 2014, 02:02PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Why not throw money at UFAs Markov or Gonchar. 1 year deal. He`d be a good mentor.

Same with the forwards. Why isn`t Jagr on this team. Kids can learn a lot from a future HHOF

Avatar
#39 The Last Big Bear
January 30 2014, 02:37PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

Is this the best place to point out that the Oilers had a physical defenceman that they couldn't be bothered to re-sign last year, who just got locked-up with a 3 year extension by the best team in the NHL?

Not saying Fistric is a candidate for the #1 spot, but suggests that the Oilers might not be appropriately valuing NHL-capable physical defencemen.

Oh, and he's 2nd among Ducks defencemen in Corsi Rel, and has the hardest Corsi QoC of any player on the team. For all you Corsi buffs. But not worth the time of day to the Oilers.

Avatar
#40 Mikey
January 30 2014, 02:47PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
The Last Big Bear wrote:

Is this the best place to point out that the Oilers had a physical defenceman that they couldn't be bothered to re-sign last year, who just got locked-up with a 3 year extension by the best team in the NHL?

Not saying Fistric is a candidate for the #1 spot, but suggests that the Oilers might not be appropriately valuing NHL-capable physical defencemen.

Oh, and he's 2nd among Ducks defencemen in Corsi Rel, and has the hardest Corsi QoC of any player on the team. For all you Corsi buffs. But not worth the time of day to the Oilers.

Not sure what your point is. Are you saying the oilers should have kept him? His cap hit at 1.2, suggest he is a 5-7 D man. His games played suggest more of a 7. For the record I would rather him than potter.

Avatar
#41 Rama Lama
January 30 2014, 05:06PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Mikey wrote:

Your memory is shot. Lidstrom is 6'1 190. Campbell is 5'10 190.

So you are telling me that Nik LIdstrom is smaller than Karlsson? I doubt it, I think your stats are goofy!

Avatar
#42 oilfan in yyc
January 30 2014, 05:29PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Everyone's numbers are better in the southeast, although I suppose the now Atlantic division is more difficult. To say that Chicago couldn't afford to keep him might be a bit misleading, I don't remember him being a top pairing guy on their cup run, and don't remember him actually playing that great for them, I think they more likely couldn't afford to pay a guy that much to be a number 3/4 guy.. Might just be my memory though.

Avatar
#43 Zarny
January 30 2014, 05:42PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Campbell's contract is stupid. That's a deal breaker for me.

As a player Campbell is not the ideal solution. He is better than what the Oilers have but his weaknesses also mirror weaknesses the Oilers already have.

So any solution including Campbell would also still require a big, physical top pairing D to handle stuff like defense and breaking up the cycle against guys like Thornton and Getzlaf.

At $7,142,875 per season that becomes very difficult if not impossible. Especially in 2015-16 when Yak's next contract kicks in and MacT goes fishing for the pieces he can't get this year.

Avatar
#44 admiralmark
January 30 2014, 06:34PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Of all the Cockimamey ideas Lowetide?! A 36 year old 7+ million player. This is not what this team needs.

Avatar
#45 4-93-14
January 31 2014, 04:44AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Brian Campbell would be a very bad idea and money not well spent!

Avatar
#46 4-93-14
January 31 2014, 04:46AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Yak Attack wrote:

This is exactly what this team needs ! This would be a bridge to the future. We need real NHL defensemen to gap the 2 or 3 years before our crop of draftee's make or break it.

What we also have been missing in our never ending re-re-re build is veterans to mentor and teach the kids how to be men.

Yes we do need someone to bridge the gap , but not Brian Campbell!

Avatar
#47 Ben Scrivens
January 30 2014, 08:40AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
76
cheers

Ben Scrivens

Avatar
#48 freelancer
January 30 2014, 09:32AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

@Sisyphys

A big bag of money. But seriously. Overpay for guys like Campbell who can give you 2 solid years of player, work as a mentor, and play your top minutes until guys like Nurse can take the load.

Avatar
#49 Taylor Gang
January 30 2014, 10:12AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

LT, my question is what if the Oilers decided to get even more bold than that? I've mentioned on this site before that Yandle would be a perfect addition to the Oilers blueline. His cap hit is 5.25 million and he's worth every penny of it. Do you think the Oilers may consider parting ways with one of our better forwards for him?

Avatar
#50 Mikey
January 30 2014, 10:28AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
OF17 wrote:

I don't see why Florida would trade him. They feel just as much pressure as we do to make the playoffs, and they really don't have much besides Campbell to carry the defensive load. Add to that the fact that Campbell's contract is actually a positive for them in helping them reach the floor, and that Tallon has consistently sung Campbell's praises across two separate organizations, and the Oilers would be in tough to acquire him.

What do we have to offer? Gagner +? Can't see Florida going for that. I'd think about a Klefbom for Campbell trade, but I'm not sure that they would, and even then, that's giving up a young, promising asset for 2 years of Campbell. The 1st rounder is too much.

I'd absolutely love to see Campbell as an Oiler, absolutely love it, but I don't see a way to make it happen.

I have to agree with you. I don't know what edmonton could trade to get him. They would likely want a roster D in the trade and if were to trade Klefbom, it had better be for a younger player than Campbell.

Maybe to get the deal done you enfold more players?

Campbell + BJUGSTAD for Gagner, Klafbom and some other pieces. But I still don't think Florida would do it.

Comments are closed for this article.