HALL IS STILL GOOD....

Jason Gregor
January 06 2014 10:41PM

Listening to some Oilers fans and pundits it sounds like Taylor Hall is a complete failure as a player, and any mention of him for the Olympic team is laughable.

I don't expect Hall to make the team,  because the hockey world is infatuated with "safe" players, and a turnover is criticized 10x more than a great play, but mainly because Canada has a lot of depth.

However, I believe it is time for some clarity regarding Hall's game.

Here is a quick list of who I believe Canada (not me) will pick for the team, in no particular order:

Tavares-Toews-Stamkos
Benn-Getzlaf-Perry
Sharp-Crosby-Giroux
St.Louis-Thornton-Nash
Bergeron-Couture

Keith-Weber
Subban-Doughty
Bouwmeester-Pietrangelo
Vlasic-Seabrook

Luongo-Price-Smith

There are many others who should be considered like Duchene, Seguin, Hall, E. Staal, Kunitz, Marleau, Carter, Letang, Giordano, Boyle and Crawford, and I'm sure my prediction won't be 100% accurate.

Some very good players will not make the team, but during the past few weeks I've read and heard comments from people that make it sound like Hall is a terrible player.

It's gotten so bad/funny that today people said they would take Duchene over Hall because he has "better hands." One guy said, "Duchene can stickhandle in a phone both, and he has had more Highlight of the Night  honours than Hall. I did not know that making it on Sportscentre was part of the evaluation process, nor did that make you a more effective player.

Duchene can deke better than Hall and he stickhandles more, but Hall is a better skater, can beat goalies on the rush, from 20-30 feet out, and he has outscored Duchene 144-109 since the beginning of the 2011/2012 season. So having better stickhandling skills is now more valuable than producing 35 more points?

I've learned a lot during the lead up to the Olympic team selection.

The major knock on Hall seems to be his turnovers. There is no arguing he turns the puck over, and he sometimes tries to be too fancy. However, he has eliminated the toe drag from his game, and he is improving his overall game. He is a young, dynamic player, and getting all the bad habits out of his game won't happen over night. It rarely does for most players.

The final roster will be full of players with more experience than Hall, but very few of them have been more productive during the past three seasons.

Since the beginning of the 2012 season Hall has scored 144 points in 144 games; 13th most in the NHL and during that span is he one of only seven players who have averaged a point a game.

Crosby:    1.53   (514 career games)
Stamkos: 1.20   (390 career games)
Giroux:      1.07   (375 career games)
Neal:         1.05   (378 career games)
St. Louis:  1.03   (1,021 career games)
Tavares:    1.01   (334 career games)
Hall:           1.00   (209 career games)

Hall is producing with the best players in the game, and all of them have more experience and are on much better teams. Even Tavares' Islanders were good for one season. Hall is producing his points with the worst defence corps in the NHL. I don't think you can overlook how well he has produced considering the quality of his teammates compared to the other top scorers in the game.

The other aspect that can't be overlooked is that Hall scores the majority of his points at even strength. It is harder to score 5-on-5, yet Hall is the 3rd most productive ES scorer in the game this season.

Crosby is averaging 0.93 ES points/game, Getzlaf is at 0.85 and Hall is at 0.84. Despite all of his turnovers and supposed lack of an overall game he produces incredibly well at even strength.

Over the past two seasons here is a look at the most productive players at even strength:

Crosby:     80
Kane:        72
Toews:      72
Hall:           68
St.Louis:   67
Getzlaf:      66
Kunitz:       65
E.Staal:     65
Tavares:    62
Duchene:  62
Perry:          61

I'm not suggesting Hall's overall game is as good as those who will make the Olympic team, but people need to calm down and recognize that very few active players produce as much as Hall has early in their careers. Hall has worked on improving his overall game, and while he does that he has still managed to produce points. He isn't sacrificing offence, because he cut out toe drags or has become better at stripping pucks of the opposition by backchecking harder. That is a good sign, because it shows he will be able to improve his overall game, and likely become even more dangerous offensively.

And that is why people should be excited about his long-term potential.

His overall game is developing nicely, but it's become ridiculous how much criticism he has faced leading up to the Olympic selection.

Scoring goals and producing points is the hardest part of hockey, and Hall is one of the best in the NHL, yet it seems during this entire process all anyone focuses on is his defensive game. That doesn't surprise me, because many coaches, media and fans have decided that sound defensive play is more valuable than scoring points.

Hall can learn to become better defensively and to protect the puck better, but you can't teach other players to be as dominant offensively as he is. I believe too many of us are guilty of watching games and only focusing too much on the negatives, and too often downplaying the positives. Hall can do things that very few players in the league can do, and that won't change once his overall game matures.

Hall can make an unreal pass through legs and sticks, but if it doesn't result in a goal it is forgotten about 30 seconds later. However, if he tries to make a high risk pass that doesn't work he is looked at as a risky player.

Seems a bit unfair, no?

I understand why Hall won't make the team this year, but the suggestions that players like Duchene and Couture are significantly better players is ridiculous.

I would understand if fans in San Jose and Colorado felt that way, but it seems that all the losing in Edmonton is starting to turn some Oiler fans into constant cynics. You should be frustrated with the losing, but your frustration shouldn't be aimed at a 22-year-old who is producing on par with the best offensive players in the NHL.

You should be annoyed at Kevin Lowe. You should be annoyed at Craig MacTavish for icing the weakest blueline in Oiler history, but breaking down Hall's game and suggesting he isn't good is barking up the wrong tree.

He is only going to get better, and everything points to him become an elite player. If management can do their job and surround him with some decent players the Oilers should have success. Winning teams have great players, and as Hall matures he I can see his game becoming elite.

Hall not making the Olympic team as a 22-year-old shouldn't subject him to harsh criticism or inaccurate pot-shots about his game. The fact he is even in the conversation should be viewed as an accomplishment, and his play and future potential should be the main catalyst to believe the Oilers might eventually improve one day.

RECENTLY BY JASON GREGOR 

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#51 S cottV
January 07 2014, 09:03AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Hall's weaknesses are definately magnified by who he plays with in the Oiler back end and with RNH in a 1C learning curve.

One day - it will be awesome to see him with legit first rotation d men, a mature RNH and a pure sniper.

In the meantime, he really needs to develop his north south game, forechecking, backpressure and d zone coverage capabilities. In addition, he needs work on developing more polish in power play situations - interacting with others.

This would make him a more complete player but also aligns himself better with the less than ideal compliments that he currently plays with. He probably has not made enough adjustments in his game, and appears to be one dimensional as a result, which is not helping his Olympic cause this year.

It must be frustrating for him but his time will come, "if" the Oilers can ever get their act together.

Avatar
#52 TonyT
January 07 2014, 09:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Just watched the announcement, and while it would have been nice to see Hall, what I noticed among the "bubble" players, is the versatility (position-wise) of those players. I believe that if Hall's time at center this season was successful that would have contributed to him getting a longer look. Not too many complaints with the selections, however Rick Nash making this team is brutal, IMO.

Avatar
#53 Calgary Oilers
January 07 2014, 10:18AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Great article, well said.

Avatar
#54 sisyphus
January 07 2014, 10:23AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Something of note---for Team Canada's roster---of the 25 players, 22 come from teams in the top half of the standings. The only outliers are Tavares, Weber, and Nash. Hate to say it, but if you play for a team in the bottom half of the league, your chances of making Team Canada plummet. There are a few exceptions, but by and large if you aren't playing for a good team, and playing well for them, you lack a lot of opportunity to make the Olympic roster.

What this says to me about Hallsy's chances for 2018, barring a truly miraculous turnaround by the Oilers, is not good. I hope for his sake he could be one of the exceptions, but it's definitely not a sure thing. And for a guy with his talent level and passion, you'd hate to see him get skipped again because he plays for a joke of an organization.

Avatar
#55 BigE91
January 07 2014, 10:57AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

A player that averages a point a game in the NHL now days is pretty rare. That said there is a lot of depth on Team Canada and Hall's time will come, he's still young and will have a shot at 2018 and 2022.

I'm quite surprised that Giroux was left off the team. He would have likely filled the role that Iginla played in 2010.

Avatar
#56 RexHolez
January 07 2014, 04:32PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@JasonGregor: "You should be annoyed at Craig MacTavish for icing the weakest blueline in Oiler history"

what are the other options that he has? has he not taken trades for better d-men from other teams? has he refused better d-men that wanted to sign here in the off season? just saying if through trades it takes another team to accept a deal. if through free agent signings, it takes that player to want to sign. if through the farm team, it would mean MacT had to be a part of those who were drafted (he wasn't).

could you clarify your statement? thanks.

Comments are closed for this article.