OILERS PP WOES...

Jason Gregor
February 05 2014 02:01PM

The Oilers have allowed a league-high 10 shorthanded goals so far. When you combine that with a struggling powerplay over the last 33 games, you can understand why many Oilers fans are frustrated.

I've noticed many suggest that coaching has to be the issue with the PP woes. Dallas Eakins wasn't here last year when the PP was 8th, and only allowed one SH goal.

Is Eakins the problem?

It would be too easy to put all the blame on Eakins, just like it was foolish to blame Tom Renney for the woes of the Oilers in 2012 and Ralph Krueger for a 24th place finish in 2013.

When I started out researching the Oilers PP woes I tried to have an open mind and not assume blame for any specific person or group. I wanted to look at different angles to see if it indeed was coaching, the players or bad luck.

I was surprised by some of the data that I found, and also re-watching the 10 SH goals gave some strong evidence that indeed it is a combination of the system and bad decisions by the players that is hurting the PP.

Some have suggested Eakins changed the system, but if you look at the first 25 games I don't think that is the case. More on that later.

I have noticed a recent change, however. Since the home game vs. Nashville the Oilers have moved to a 1-3-1 PP system, but they haven't seen any success yet. They are 0-18 since making the switch. So time will tell if they adjust to that.

Outside of changing coaches, what other changes happened on the PP? What about personnel? 

2014       2013    
Player  PP TOI PP TOI/G  Player  PP TOI PP TOI/G 
Jordan Eberle 189:21:00 3:19   Justin Schultz 153:40:00 3:12
Ryan Nugent-Hopkins 184:45:00 3:17   Jordan Eberle 153:18:00 3:11
Justin Schultz 181:32:00 3:37   Taylor Hall 146:03:00 3:14
Taylor Hall 174:34:00 3:25   Sam Gagner 140:37:00 2:55
David Perron 168:05:00 3:06   Ryan Nugent-Hopkins 121:34:00 3:02
Sam Gagner 123:00:00 2:44   Nail Yakupov 119:07:00 2:28
Nail Yakupov 119:56:00 2:15   Ales Hemsky 100:04:00 2:38
Ales Hemsky 119:48:00 2:23   Ryan Whitney 87:51:00 2:35
Ryan Smyth 113:35:00 2:21   Shawn Horcoff 78:10:00 2:31

You will notice that seven of the top nine players are still here. Perron and Smyth have taken over for Whitney and Horcoff in the top-nine most PP minutes.

Horcoff only played 31 of the 48 games, but he played on the top unit for much of it, and when he did he made an impact. He did all the dirty jobs: winning faceoffs, retrieving pucks in the corners and battling in front of the net. I know many didn't like Horcoff, but you can't overlook his impact on the PP.

In the 31 games he dressed, the PP was 26 of 109 for 23.8%.
In the 17 games he sat out, the PP went 8 of 60 for 13.3%.

I believe he played a key role in the success of the PP over the previous two seasons.

I will get into the Oilers PP success/struggles in a bit, but I wanted to look at every team's PP from last year to this year. The Oilers aren't the only top-ten team from last year to struggle this year. 

2014               2013            
Rank Team  GP  PP Opp  PPG  PP% SHGA %change Rank Team  GP  PP Opp  PPG  PP% SHGA
30 FLA 56 183 17 9.3 3 -11.10% 6 FLA 48 142 29 20.4 1
28 LAK 58 207 29 14 4 -5.90% 10 LAK 48 166 33 19.9 1
26 CGY 56 177 25 14.1 7 -5.90% 9 CGY 48 155 31 20 2
5 WSH 57 209 47 22.5 7 -4.30% 1 WSH 48 164 44 26.8 4
22 NYI 58 194 32 16.5 5 -3.40% 11 NYI 48 156 31 19.9 0
16 ANA 58 196 36 18.4 5 -3.10% 4 ANA 48 135 29 21.5 5
19 EDM 58 203 35 17.2 10 -2.90% 8 EDM 48 169 34 20.1 1
29 VAN 58 186 25 13.4 2 -2.40% 22 VAN 48 165 26 15.8 3
20 TBL 56 184 31 16.8 5 -2.20% 13 TBL 48 163 31 19 4
18 SJS 57 207 37 17.9 2 -2.20% 7 SJS 48 169 34 20.1 4
15 MTL 57 192 36 18.8 3 -1.90% 5 MTL 48 203 42 20.7 2
8 PHI 57 207 41 19.8 9 -1.80% 3 PHI 48 171 37 21.6 3
21 DET 56 196 33 16.8 3 -1.60% 15 DET 48 185 34 18.4 5
23 DAL 56 199 31 15.6 3 -1.40% 18 DAL 48 171 29 17 3
27 CAR 55 192 27 14.1 2 -0.05% 27 CAR 48 165 24 14.6 4
1 PIT 56 181 45 24.9 3 0.20% 2 PIT 48 170 42 24.7 3
17 MIN 58 181 33 18.2 4 0.30% 16 MIN 48 151 27 17.9 0
25 WPG 58 188 27 14.4 6 0.60% 30 WPG 48 145 20 13.8 3
24 BUF 55 176 26 14.8 3 0.70% 29 BUF 48 163 23 14.1 7
7 NSH 57 171 35 20.5 0 3.40% 17 NSH 48 140 24 17.1 4
13 OTT 57 191 37 19.4 8 3.50% 20 OTT 48 157 25 15.9 1
2 STL 55 196 45 23 5 3.50% 12 STL 48 149 29 19.5 5
10 NJD 57 168 33 19.6 1 3.70% 21 NJD 48 176 28 15.9 6
12 NYR 57 189 37 19.6 5 3.90% 23 NYR 48 153 24 15.7 4
3 TOR 58 185 42 22.7 6 4.00% 14 TOR 48 166 31 18.7 4
11 COL 56 168 33 19.6 1 4.60% 24 COL 48 140 21 15 3
14 CBJ 56 190 36 19 6 4.80% 28 CBJ 48 155 22 14.2 2
9 PHX 56 192 38 19.8 4 5.00% 25 PHX 48 169 25 14.8 2
4 CHI 58 186 42 22.6 5 5.90% 19 CHI 48 150 25 16.7 5
6 BOS 55 159 33 20.8 5 6.00% 26 BOS 48 122 18 14.8 2

A few things I noticed:

We've seen more SH goals this year, 132 in 851 games, compared to last season's 93 in 720 games. The Oilers definitely have played a role in the increase, and so has Ottawa and Philadelphia. I went and looked at the 2012 season, and that year there was 185 SHG in 1230 games, meaning this year they are on almost the exact same pace. It would seem that last year SHG were down a bit. I have no explanation why.

The average PPG/game, however, is essentially the exact same.

In 2013 the league had 872 PPG in 720 games for 1.21 PPG/game.
In 2014 we've seen 1,024 PPG in 851 games for 1.20 PPG/game.
In 2012 there was 1,408 PPG in 1230 games for 1.14 PPG/game, but in 2011 we had 1.27PPG/game, so the past two seasons would fit right in as the average.

WHAT REALLY STOOD OUT...

It is interesting to note that 10 of the top 11 powerplays from 2013 have taken a dip in 2014. Washington and Philadelphia have dropped in %, but they are still 3rd and 8th respectively, so I'd say that 8 of 11 have dropped significantly.

The Canadiens, Ducks, Flames, Islanders, Kings and Sharks have had the same coach both years, while Florida and Edmonton have a new head coach. Many want to blame Eakins for the woes of the Oilers PP, and while he might play a small part, I believe an equal, or more, amount of blame goes to the players.

You can't say it is solely Eakins, when six other top-ten teams for 2013 have all dropped to 15th or worse, but they have the same coach. I believe many factors go into the success and failure of a PP, and most of the success falls to the players.

Washington has the most dangerous goal scorer in the game and their PP focuses on finding him the puck in great shooting positions, usually on the left side where he can one-time the puck. He's a special player, and outside of Steven Stamkos I don't see any players as consistently dangerous on the man advantage.

DO THE OILERS HAVE GREAT PP PLAYERS?

Ovechkin is scary good on the powerplay, especially when he unleashes his heavy shot.

I looked at some of the top PP producers and last year's PP success for the Oilers seemed odd because they didn't have one guy who dominated on the PP.

In 2012 the Oilers finished 20.6% on the PP, 3rd in the NHL, and that year they did have some dominant PP players.

The Oilers scored 54 PP goals. RNH had 23 PP points, Hall had 21 and Eberle had 20. Hall and RNH each missed 20 games, but still produced that well. If you pro-rate their PP points over the full 82 games, RNH and Hall would have had 30 and 28 points respectively, which would have put them close to the leading PP producers.

However, last season when the Oilers were 8th in PP, not one player feasted on the man advantage.

The Oilers scored 34 PPG last year, 6th best in the NHL, but their leading PP point producers were Sam Gagner and Justin Schultz and they were tied for 30th in PP points.

Gagner and J.Schultz had 15 points each, while Hall had 14, RNH had 11 and Yakupov had 10.
Schultz and Gagner were in on 44.1% of the Oilers PP goals. That isn't close to what the best PP guys produce.

2013 PP Leaders:

Henrik Zetterberg was in on 67.6% (23) of Detroit's 34 goals.
Phil Kessel was in on 63.6% (21) of Toronto's 33 goals.
P.K. Subban was in on 61.9% (26) of Montreal's 42 goals.
Joe Thorton was in on 61.7% of (21) of San Jose's 34 scores.
Alex Ovechkin and Mike Ribeiro were in on 61.3% (27) of of WSH's 44 tallies.
Steven Stamkos was in on 58% (18) of Tampa's 31 goals.
Claude Giroux was in on 56.7% (21) of Philly's 37 goals.
Andre Markov was in on 54.7% (23) of Montreal's 42 goals.

All of those teams were in the top 11 of powerplay efficiency, and those players were the catalysts to successful powerplays. The Oilers had PP success, but it was spread around and I feel that "share the wealth" production would be hard to recreate.

If you look at this season you'll see the same trend.

The Oilers have four players in the top-50 scorers in the league, but they only have two players in the top-75 of powerplay points.

Nugent-Hopkins has been in on 45.7% (16) of the Oilers 35 goals. Eberle has contributed to 42.8% (15) while Hall has only been in on 34.2% (12).

2014 PP Leaders:

John Tavares has been in on 75% (24) of the New York's 32 goals.
Nicklas Backstrom has been in on 65.9% (31) of the Capitals' 47 goals.
Erik Karlsson has been in on 64.8% (24) of Ottawa's 37 goals.
Giroux has been a part of 58.5% (24) of the Flyers' 41 goals.
Crosby was a part of 57.7% (26) of the Penguins' 45 goals.
Ovechkin has been in on 57.5% (27) of the Capitals' 47 goals.
Joe Pavelski has been in on 56.7% (21) of the Sharks' 37 goals.
Patrick Kane has been a part of 54.5% (23) of the Hawks' 42 goals.
David Krejci has been in on 54.5% (18) of the Bruins' 33 goals.
Shea Weber has been in on 54.4% (19) of the Predators' 35 goals.

Tavares is the only player on a team not in the top-ten in PP%. The Blues are this year's version of the 2013 Oilers when it comes to the PP. They are 2nd in the league, but none of their players have been in on more than 44.4% (Kevin Shattenkirk) of their goals.

When you look closer to the Blues success, the other thing they have in common with the Oilers is a high SH%. The Blues lead the NHL in 5-on-4 SH% at 16.4. This is almost identical to what the Oiler shooters did last season. 

Last year, the Oilers were 2nd best in the NHL with 5-on-4 SH% at 16.8, but they also averaged the 2nd fewest shots/60 on the PP, so it was unlikely they were going to maintain that success rate on the PP.

This year the Oilers are once again near the bottom, 26th, in SF/60 on 5-on-4, but their SH% has dropped from 16.8 to 11.84. Either they are shooting from worse positions, or more likely not getting as many shots from close range.

WHAT ABOUT SH GOALS?

I think the Oilers actual production on the PP hasn't been awful. In the first 25 games of the season they were 20.7%, a bit better than last year, but in the last 33 games the wheels have fallen off. I highly doubt the coaching staff suddenly changed the system 25 games in.

I've noticed teams are playing the Oilers different this year. They slide block to prevent the back door play, so it's tough to have a guy on the goal line producing. The Oilers have had to work farther out from the net, and because they don't have a heavy shot from the blueline, it makes it much harder to generate quality chances. Until they get a threat from the point their PP will continue to struggle.

They could look at using Nail Yakupov more often on the first unit, but he would need to set up for the one-timer on the right point, and currently the Oilers PP runs off the right wall with RNH. They currently have Hemsky on the left wall with Yak on his off wing on the 2nd unit but that unit hasn't had great success either. They could look at using Gagner as the set up guy on the left wall on the 1st unit, with Yakupov, Smyth, J.Schultz and Hall. The problem with that is I think RNH is their best PP option to run the PP through, so until the get a dangerous right-handed shot on the blueline I think they will be hard-pressed to produce.

Yakupov has a great shot, but so far I haven't seen him put himself in good shooting positions often enough. As much as the coach can diagram certain plays, much of the PP success comes down to the players adlibbing as they go, and right now the Oilers lack a PP catalyst.

Someone needs to step up and become the focal point on their PP, and this summer MacTavish needs to find a defender with a heavy shot who is good on the powerplay.

However, the big concern for the Oilers is that they've allowed a league-high 10 SH goals this year. The crazy part is the Oilers are allowing virtually the exact same amount of shots on goal this year compared to last. Last year they allowed 8.2SA60 and this year they are allowing 8.4.

In the first 25 games when their PP was producing the Oilers allowed 4 SH goals, but one was an empty netter.

Let's look at each goal.

October 5th vs. Vancouver: Brad Richardson.

 They had Hemsky on the right wall with Yakupov, Hall, Smyth and J.Schultz, which in theory would be good for setting up Hall in the slot or Yakupov on right point for one timers. This play starts with a bad pass from Hemsky. The pass is deflected and forces J.Schultz to pinch and it gets by him. If Hemsky makes a good pass this play doesn't happen. I don't blame the set up or the system for that goal.

October 5th vs. Vancouver: Jason Garrison

I think it is safe to say that is an unlucky SH goal against.

October 7th, New Jersey: Patrick Elias

That goal came with :03 seconds left in the Devils penalty. They lost a battle on the far boards that led to the puck going to Elias in the corner. It was another unlucky own goal, and not one due to the offensive zone attack or set up.

November 25th vs. Chicago: Jonathan Toews

 The Oilers go with five forwards. They dump it in and Hall pressures Keith, but you can either say Keith made a great hesitation move to avoid him, or Hall went after the puck instead of the man. Saad breaks his stick and fans on the clearing attempt. Yakupov had leaned backwards thinking the puck was going down the ice, which usually it would, but then he had to try and keep it in at the blueline and Toews pounced. A regular D-man might have been handled the bouncing puck better because they are used to being pressured at the blueline, but it is hard to fault Yakupov on that goal. Usually breaking your stick in your own zone puts your team at a disadvantage, but this time it helped the Hawks. I still think five forwards is rarely a good idea 5-on-4.

December 1st vs Dallas: Ryan Garbutt

This was all Denis Grebeshkov. Right before his brutal giveaway he was unable to keep the puck in at the blueline. This is on the player, not the coach, unless you argue there is no reason Grebeshkov should be on the PP. I'd blame Craig MacTavish for this goal. We had seen this type of play from him often in his first tour with the Oilers, expecting him to be different this time around was wishful thinking.

December 10th vs Carolina: Eric Staal

 Perron falls but makes a good pass to Eberle. Eberle was pressured a bit, but that was a bad pass and Staal makes a great move to score. My other question is why would RNH go down so low in the slot and not stay high. The Oilers had four guys below the ringette line. I watched a few other zone entries, and it does seem that often they have four guys that low. When Eberle picks up the puck his only option is to go to Larsen, and that is where his teammates need to give him better outlets. But ultimately that is a bad pass by Eberle.

December 12th vs. Boston: Brad Marchand

The Oilers have complete control of the puck in the offensive zone. They are set up, Larsen walks the blueline correctly, but then he just fires the puck into Bergeron's pads and away they go. Eberle gives a good effort backchecking, but he doesn't go towards Marchand, instead he stays in the middle of ice. If he goes straight to Marchand and ties up his stick, Marchand might not bury that goal. I don't see coaching as the issue on that goal. Eakins should show Eberle the video and say good effort getting back, but next time to go the man not to the goalie.

December 19th vs. Colorado: Max Talbot.

Again, the Oilers have control of the puck, but they make a high-risk, ill-advised pass that leads to a 2-on-1. Justin Schultz would like to have that pass back. You will notice at the :25 second mark Schultz has control and he had RNH as a safe outlet on the boards, but elected to go to his left instead, where neither Hall or Eberle were set up. On this play the Oilers had four guys above the top of the circles and still gave up an odd-man rush due to a bad pass. That is inexperience and trying to force the play.

January 18th vs Winnipeg: Jacob Trouba

 This was a complete team breakdown. Belov can't get the puck in deep at the offensive blueline and the Jets transition quickly. Petry inexplicably leaves his feet, which should never happen that far out or when you have more guys on the ice, and Ryan Smyth doesn't pick up his man on the backcheck.

The Oilers had two D-men on the ice, yet I'd argue that was the worst SH goal they gave up this year when you consider how many bad decisions were made by multiple players.

February 3rd vs. Buffalo: Drew Stafford

 

You have one of your best puckhandlers bring the puck in the zone, peel off to the boards and create time and space. Eberle needs to make a better pass, but once again you will notice his teammates only gave him one outlet, Yakupov. I'd say this is a combination of a bad decision by the player  and a bad system. I've witnessed the players slide down low so frequently on the PP when they enter the zone that I believe that is their system. It clearly isn't great, but ultimately when you have possession of the puck your skilled players should be able to make a good pass.

I think this goal illustrates perfectly the issue with the PP woes of the Oilers. It is a combination of a bad play by a player, and his teammates failing to provide better outlets. To me it looks like that is how the coach wants the team to enter the zone.

WRAP UP

I understand why people want to blame the coach for the woes of the PP. It was better the past two seasons, and he wasn't here, and as Jonathan Willis pointed out here, teams coached by Eakins have struggled both on the PP and allowing SH goals.

It is fair to say he needs to alter some things on the PP, but after watching those goals it is clear to me the players need to make better decisions with the puck as well. I also think the powerplay has been static far too often this year. They need more consistent motion. It is a skill to learn how to put yourself in good positions to shoot, and that is something the PP units need to improve on.

I think past history proves that blaming the coach for the woes of the Oilers isn't working. The players, just like the coach, need to be more accountable and more consistent, and until that happens this team will struggle on the PP and ES.

RECENTLY BY JASON GREGOR 

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#51 **
February 06 2014, 01:16AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Zarny wrote:

What are you talking about? This isn't football. Coaches don't call "plays". There is no Zulu Tango Foxtrot.

Systems are general zone and/or man assignments not skating routes. You might practice a breakout based on defensive tendencies of your opponent but if they do something different you improvise and move on you don't do it again.

Have you been on the ice when the coach has been drawing x's and o's on the white board? 9 times out of ten it goes for sh*t off the draw and then you just play hockey.

"Have you been on the ice when the coach has been drawing x's and o's on the white board? 9 times out of ten it goes for sh*t off the draw and then you just play hockey."

And yet they hockey coaches keep doing it, so either they are utterly stupid, or there is merit to it. There's no grey area there, chose one. I didn't just mention football, I also mentioned basket ball, which I think is the closest to hockey in terms of fluidity of the game. Stop thinking x's and o's are just the passing routes of a football book.

Avatar
#52 john
February 06 2014, 02:38AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Hi Jason, obviously Eakins is the problem, overhyped AHL coach to lead teams to promised land. Oilers allowed the most goals against in NHL this year, allowed too many shots against. Oilers Power play and Penalty kill are not the top like previous years. Even a retarded monkey can see that, they have 4 forwards and 1 Dman on PP, they don't shoot the puck and turn pucks over the forwards cannot come back and defend. That's why they allowed 10 shorthanded goals against. On penalty kill, they don't pressure the puck carrier and cover the open men, they stand around and watch the puck. Every single players on the team is minus in +/-, I have never seen that before on any team. Yakupov is a scorer, put him out in PP to shoot the puck and go for rebounds. They kept passing the puck around and don't shoot, there is no perfect pass for a highlite goal. Shoot the pucks.

Avatar
#53 2004Z06
February 06 2014, 12:05PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
lennyl wrote:

Here is a thought! Maybe players don't want to play for a coach like that!!?? They loved to play for Krueger last year, just ask Yakupov, and how different it is this year, just ask Yakupov.

Then you reinforce that the players are the problem!

I may not like my boss, but I have pride in my work and I bring it to the table every day.

You are essentially stating that the players have quit on yet another coach.

Speaks volumes!

I do like my boss though.

Avatar
#54 Jeff
February 06 2014, 01:56PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

In the dressing room is a phrase Coach Eakins put up... “Chop Wood Carry Water”

“It would be too easy to put all the blame on Eakins, just like it was foolish to blame Tom Renney for the woes of the Oilers in 2012 and Ralph Krueger for a 24th place finish in 2013.”

Huh.... Tom Renney and Krueger both got tossed for being “foolish to blame”.

“You can't say it is solely Eakins, when six other top-ten teams for 2013 have all dropped to 15th or worse, but they have the same coach. I believe many factors go into the success and failure of a PP, and most of the success falls to the players.”

No one is saying it solely Eakins (if they are they are foolish), but Eakins is responsible for the result of the team.....period.

“I think past history proves that blaming the coach for the woes of the Oilers isn't working. The players, just like the coach, need to be more accountable and more consistent, and until that happens this team will struggle on the PP and ES.”

This is such a brutal argument. Past history does not prove that that blaming the coach for the woes is wrong. The biggest issue I have with this statement is that everyone needs to be more accountable (including the coach,,,even though this article gives nothing but excuses to JG man crush Eakins)

If the players are not being accountable for the play/ not being in position on the PP/not going to the front of the net/not executing what the coach wants/not competing (and we assume the coach is making these request).... would that not mean the coach is not effectively coaching his team to get the result the coach is looking for. And would that not be the fundamental issue that is arising in the organization.....

“Chop Wood Carry Water” no one (including the coach) is picking up an axe and no one (including the coach) seems to be getting a bucket.

Avatar
#55 THRNHJE
February 05 2014, 05:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@pillay

He doing asset management or something like that for a soccer team. I am sure he is getting some good coin for that, and the respect he deserves for the resume he has.

Avatar
#56 Oiler Al
February 06 2014, 07:06AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

If your shooting % is low on 5X5, its the same shooters on 5X4 that will give you a low %. The mentality wont change much.

Also, the No.1 unit plays tiddly winks around the boards forever, end up loosing the puck most times, and if there was an idea to take a shot or pass to the net, there is no one in front of the blue paint 80% of the time.

Limited scoring from the backend. J. Schultz has 8 pts, .. Ference/Belov/Petry/Potter, combined have 6 pts. Yandle/OEL have 32pts combined and Chara/Krug have 28 pts. combined,Keith/Seabrook 28 pts. etc .

There are teams out there that know something about winning.

Avatar
#57 Rdubb
February 06 2014, 07:44AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Jason I listened to your explanation yesterday to start off your show, and I agree with you, the short handed goals have nothing to do with Eakins but more so with mistakes made by personnel on the ice @ the time. I personally have never blamed Eakins for the SH goals, BUT, Eakins must be blamed for the "NEW SYSTEMS" installed for both PP & PK. On the PP Eakins has his players set up in, well, whacky spots to say the least. And even you know this and have said it many, many times on your show... RNH should be the set up man with either Hall or Yak on the opposite side ready for the one-timers, Eberle down low...but Eakins has everyone pretty much back ass backwards, and even though it is mistakes made by players which leads to short handed goals against, the positioning of the players must be taken into account & is the "lead-up" to these mistakes... It is okay to have 5 forwards on the PP at once, but only when on a 5 on 3, not on the regular 5 on 4. And having J.Schultz on the PP is just like having another forward, although he is a bit more accustomed to defending. So if JS is on the PP, I think/feel like Marincin should be on the opposite side, he has skill, is a good passer, and more importantly, has a harder shot than JS. If MM isn't your guy, than Petry, or even Larsen if he is the line-up. Belov had me excited at the start of the season (& you too! I cannot remember you exact words, but you loved him in the 1st few games) has his shot was hard, low & accurate. Everything one wants from a point shot...but, what happened? If, & that's a big if, Eakins wants to play 4 forwards and JS on the PP, would RNH not be a good guy to play the point? His shot isn't all that hard, but his ability to makes passes, and more importantly, he can defend some to if needed. Than put Ebe's on the 1/2 wall, & either Hall or Yak on the opposite side for a one-timer and the other guy down low...I think that would be a better set-up than what the Oilers are using now... Just my opinion, but what do you think? Peck

Avatar
#58 Jaroslav Pouzar
February 06 2014, 02:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

With all the shorties they've been giving up, they should switch to a 4-1-0 formation for their PP.

Avatar
#59 Tuningout
February 05 2014, 10:06PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

I guess my argument would be that when I get poor, unclear, incorrect, or inconsistent direction from management ... I make poor decisions too. I'm not taking all the blame off the players for these poor decisions. It happens, as proved by many top teams with poor PP this year. I just simply can't get my head wrapped around giving the coaching team 90% of the blame this year. By eye, mostly I attribute this to the confusion and disorganization of simply moving the puck from behind our own net to getting it over the blue line with control. It's like watching scared confused kids, which I assume on many levels they are. Preparation is everything.

Comments are closed for this article.