PACE IN PRACTICE..

Jason Gregor
March 10 2014 11:11AM

Allen Iverson's rant on practice is a classic. Iverson had sat out a practice and it became a huge story in Philly. When Iverson retired Gary Payton told the story how in the summer prior to this interview Iverson had asked him how he was able to keep his body fresh and play every game. Payton told him his head coach, George Karl, wouldn't let him practice very much. Karl knew he was a smaller guard and he needed rest to keep his body healthy. Iverson took it to heart, but he might not have went about it the right way.

It is still a great rant, and it relates to the Oilers because of what Ladislav Smid and Ilya Bryzgalov said regarding the pace and intensity of their new team's practices.

After his first practice with the Calgary Flames, Smid said he was surprised at how intense the practice was, and last week Ilya Brzygalov said the Wild practices had "a much faster pace."

Do the Oilers need to practice harder? Can they practice harder?

I went looking for the answers to those questions and a few more. I spoke with Dallas Eakins, Sam Gagner and David Perron about the Oilers practices.

I spoke to Perron because he was in St.Louis the previous six seasons, and I was curious if he noticed a difference in how the teams practiced.

Do you think it is up to the players to control the pace and tempo practice?

I do. Dallas mentioned it a lot. Do you want to be the guy driving the practice or do you want to sit in the back of the bus and hope the day goes by, and that’s not a way you get better. It’s up to us to bring that level higher. I think it has improved over the season, but there is another level to get to for sure.

How can you make practices more intense?

It’s pretty simple. Every time there is a rebound you try to score. Every time you go by the net you stop. The hard work comes with the habits. When you have good habits it brings your level higher because you want to succeed.

If you’re not going to do it in the game, you have to start doing it in practice and then it will translate in the game. You will go by the net and it will be natural that you will stop. Early in the year we didn’t have many guys going to the net, but I think it has gotten better and when we do have one-on-one battles in practice we can be harder for sure.

What differences have you noticed from practices in St.Louis to Edmonton?

Here they are a bit longer and we have more explanation at the board. I’m not sure if it’s because we are a younger team and having to explain more system stuff.

In St. Louis it (practice) was pretty short, because when you’ve been on the same team for a bit you’re on the same page, and that’s why they are having success and that’s what we are trying to get to here.

THOUGHTS...

The Oilers are younger than the Blues and Eberle, Nugent-Hopkins, Hall, Yakupov, J.Schultz and Petry have had a new coach every season they've played. It makes sense that this team needs more teaching and likely why their practices don't have a consistent flow as often as a veteran team like the Blues.

The Oilers still don't go to the net as often as they should, but Perron was bang on that at least they are doing it more than they did earlier in the season. The issue with the Oilers top-six isn't the individual talent of the players, rather that they are essentially all the same. Outside of Perron, the other five didn't have a "drive-the-net" philosophy in junior. It is hard to completely alter a player's game, and that's why I believe this group needs a different mix of players. They are all too similar.

GAGNER

89-Gagner-7

Sam Gagner has played his entire career in Edmonton. He's had five different head coaches and I asked him his thoughts on the pace and intensity of Oilers practice.

Some former teammates said the pace in practice was higher on their new team. Perron said your team’s pace was lower at the start of the season, but it has improved throughout the year. Have you noticed a difference, and if so in what way?

I think a lot of times when you are going to a new team you are flying and stuff, and that first practice is going to be tough regardless. For us, pace starts with puck movement and I think it has gotten better as the year’s gone on. If you are going to be a successful team in this league you have to be able to execute. That is something we are really focusing on, especially in practice, and we have to continue to get better if we’re going to become one of the top teams in the league. We still have a way to go.

Do you believe if you practice harder maybe they will play harder and grittier?

I’m a huge believer in it. I’ve always thought when you are in a slump you break it in practice before you break it in a game. You’re not always going to feel great in practice, whether you played a game the night before, but you have to find a way to get the most out of yourself, execute properly and move the puck properly and get your pace going. It translates into a game hugely.

Is the pace of practice set more by the players or the coach?

I think the coach is driving the practice and we’re the ones pushing it. The coaches have a practice plan and they lay it out, but it is on us to make sure we are pushing it.

Thoughts...

Gagner was on to something about the first practice with a new team. Smid's first practice in Calgary came after an off day for the Flames and when he was traveling. However, Gagner did admit his team still has room to improve in practice.

A few years ago I interviewed Nick Lidstrom and he told me that bad passes weren't acceptable during Red Wings practices. Players would get on each other if they made bad passes. He firmly believed that if you accepted bad passing in practice it would happen in the game. Mike Babcock said those rules were put in place by the players not the coaches, because the players needed to manage and decide which passes weren't acceptable. He said it carried more weight when a teammate challenged a player on his passing rather than the coach.

The Oilers don't have something like that in place, and if they do implement a similar rule, it has to be initiated by the players not the coach.

COACH EAKINS

Dallas Eakins 18

Do you have a response to what Bryzgalov said last week and Smid earlier in the season about the difference in the pace and intensity of practice?

I would totally agree with them. In the Smid case, he traveled the whole day and his first practice came after a day off and of course that will be a high-paced practice.

In Bryz’s case he is excited; he is going to a team that is coming off the trade deadline where they made some moves to try and take a good swat at the Stanley Cup. After that deadline I’m sure their practice was very exciting to get the new players in.

Did they have great pace in those practices, absolutely? But I will tell you this. I’ve watched a lot of teams practice in the NHL, teams that have come into our building and a lot of times when your team is struggling you go watch to make sure you aren’t missing something. I put our practices up against anybody in the league and I’ve seen some very good teams practice that, boy, there was no pace.

It was more rest, move the puck and conserve for the game. There are so many different ways you can skin the cat getting ready for the game. But for our team right now, when it’s supposed to be pace, we go after the pace, but a lot of time it has been about teaching.

How much do you feel is on you to set the pace, or how much of it is up to the players to set the pace?

I think it is up to everyone. It is up to the players to push each other; it is up to the coach to make sure they are going. The structure of the practice depending on the day of the week and how many games they’ve played, what you need to work on, that usually dictates the real pace of the practice is what you are trying to accomplish.

If you are coming off a day off and you don’t play for a couple days, that’s going to be a tough, hard battle, very high-paced practice. When you’re playing every other day you might be just working on your powerplay, which slows down the practice. And for our group, especially this year, we’ve had to do so much teaching that you are stopping practice and going into the details and trying to hammer home these new concepts and new habits. You could go watch a team practice five different days and each day the pace would be greatly, greatly different.

Is the plan to have less whiteboard time next year which will increase the pace of practice?

Exactly. The less you have to go to the board, but more importantly, the less you have to stop the drill and make sure everybody is in the right spots and re-enforce it, then you can get on to other stuff.

You have to be careful with pace in practice. We can go out and do a whole bunch of shooting drills that look nice and shiny and everyone will be skating fast, but they have little to do with the structure of the game. There are days you want the pace high, and there are days where you need the detail and the teaching. Our team right now, much less than at the start of year, we are still in the teaching phase and we are not going to let the details go.

WRAP UP....

  • The Oilers top players aren't very physical or gritty, so I wouldn't expect them to be in practice. They are also young and inexperienced and they keep turning over the puck in games, so I understand why the coach is still spending a lot of time on the whiteboard. I still don't think they battle as hard as they should -- Perron said the same -- but I think that is also a product of the make up of this team.

    The Oilers don't have a very big or aggressive blueline. Prior to Mark Fraser's arrival, Andrew Ference was the only D-man who would play physical. I've watched Fraser in practice and he doesn't go easy on the forwards. That will help them. If they are never exposed to playing against big, mean and aggressive defenders in practice, it makes sense that they would struggle against them in a game. Fraser at least gives them an idea of how hard it will be to go to the net or come out the corner against a big D-man. Petry, J.Schultz, N.Schultz, Potter and Larsen never presented that challenge.

    I remember watching Steve Staios, Jason Smith and Ethan Moreau practice. Smith and Staios practiced like they played, and they used to have some great battles with Moreau. I believe that helped them during games.

    The Oilers are starting to get a few more players like that. Hendricks brings an edge to practice as does Gordon and Perron, but until the Oilers get more skilled players with size I don't see this issue being solved. You practice like you play and the Oilers aren't blessed with many big, strong or aggressive players right now. They also don't have a lot of "old man" strength in their top-six. The Oilers skilled players will be much better and stronger when they are all 24 years of age and older, but they currently they lack the size and strength to compete with other teams.

    I still would like to see a bit more intensity in the battle drills, but like Perron and Gagner said that has to come from the players.

  • I watched last night's game from the lower bowl and the size difference of the Oilers and Kings was even more obvious. If you don't believe the Oilers need more size in their top-six now, then I'm not sure what games you've been watching. I thought the Oilers overall effort was fine, they just aren't as big, mature and experienced as the Kings. The Kings could manhandle the Oilers when they wanted to, and until this team matures and adds some skilled size I don't see that changing.

  • Jordan Nolan sucker punches Jesse Joensuu and nothing happens to him. I didn't see anyone even mouth him off when he was on the ice in the 3rd period. I'm sure Gazdic said something from the bench, but I don't understand why he wasn't put on the ice against Nolan. The score was 4-2 with 10 minutes to play, did anyone think the stingy Kings were going to relinquish the lead? For me it was another example of showing teams they can get away with anything against the Oilers.

    At some point isn't it important to send a message, other than the one that says it is okay to take liberties on our players?

  • I'm looking for a travel agent or agency to team up with me for a great fundraiser. If you are interested please email me at gregor@tsn1260.ca.

  • Oscar Klefbom is a now considered a regular recall and will make his NHL debut in Minnesota tomorrow.

  • Is coaching on the verge of ruining hockey? One NHL sniper thinks it is. Read here.

RECENTLY BY JASON GREGOR

Ddf3e2ba09069c465299f3c416e43eae
One of Canada's most versatile sports personalities. Jason hosts The Jason Gregor Show, weekdays from 2 to 6 p.m., on TSN 1260, and he writes a column every Monday in the Edmonton Journal. You can follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/JasonGregor
Avatar
#1 R U Kidding Me!
March 10 2014, 11:21AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

As always I encourage adding to the conversation by saying more than a reference to a clenched hand. Edited with much love by Gregor.

Avatar
#2 Cold Hard Truth
March 10 2014, 11:27AM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
41
cheers

Eakins, Gagner, and Perron play down the comments made on the pace of Oilers' practice? Surprise, surprise. Ask them again once one of them leaves the team. You'll get an honest answer.

Avatar
#3 BingBong
March 10 2014, 11:32AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers

Good post. My thoughts:

I agree that not every practice is going to be fast paced, so looking at another teams practice and judging ours seems a little unfair.

That being said, you make a great point about our forwards having no tough D to deal with in practice. Schultz, Larson, Petry, etc. We don't have 1 single defensemen who will punish our forwards in practice, which just makes it that much worse in real games.

Finally, the lack of pushback after that Nolan cheapshot was pathetic. I don't understand how you can watch that and then not do anything. The ref saw it firsthand, and gave Nolan 4 minutes. So now we know that a punch to the face when the guy isn't looking is only worth 4 minutes. I would of sent Gazdic and Hendricks out there to punch away...

Avatar
#4 R U Kidding Me!
March 10 2014, 11:32AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
44
cheers

Nothing frustrates and pisses me off more than seeing these players time and time again not sticking up for each other.

This isn't something you can teach, some of these guys have to go.

Avatar
#5 Rama Lama
March 10 2014, 11:33AM
Trash it!
21
trashes
Cheers
21
cheers

JG...........I respect your need to defend Dallas.

I for one do not give a rat's ass how the team practices or what the players say about practicing on other teams.

What most fans care about is seeing improvement...........even incremental improvement. If we improved in any metric, fans would probably lay off this guy. The sad fact is we have NOT improved in any area of the game, except dietary may be.

Avatar
#6 R U Kidding Me!
March 10 2014, 11:35AM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
31
cheers

I'm also sick of the bullpoop coming out of Eakins mouth all the time.

Avatar
#8 Bucky
March 10 2014, 11:48AM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Best way to fix boring defensive hockey.

Give an extra point in the standing for every 5 goals scored in a game.

Win 5-0 Winner gets 3 points loser zero points. Win 10-5 Winner gets 4 points loser gets one point

Teams will try to score more. Fans will be happier and it would be prudent for the coach to think more offensive

Avatar
#9 HugThePost
March 10 2014, 11:57AM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
Bucky wrote:

Best way to fix boring defensive hockey.

Give an extra point in the standing for every 5 goals scored in a game.

Win 5-0 Winner gets 3 points loser zero points. Win 10-5 Winner gets 4 points loser gets one point

Teams will try to score more. Fans will be happier and it would be prudent for the coach to think more offensive

Don't think I agree.

There's nothing boring about a team that forechecks and backchecks hard and plays a possession game (see Chicago).

Do you think giving extra reward for more offense will make watching guys like JShultz and Gagner and Eberle (all of whom probably play better defense on NHL14 than in real life) better more entertaining players to watch? Right now all they think about is offense, and they are horrible to watch.

Avatar
#10 GoKlefbom
March 10 2014, 12:00PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers
Rama Lama wrote:

JG...........I respect your need to defend Dallas.

I for one do not give a rat's ass how the team practices or what the players say about practicing on other teams.

What most fans care about is seeing improvement...........even incremental improvement. If we improved in any metric, fans would probably lay off this guy. The sad fact is we have NOT improved in any area of the game, except dietary may be.

You don't care about practice? That tells me you have no clue how teams are supposed to improve.

I care about having a plan and sticking with it, something this organization hasn't done for four years.

This fan is sick of fans like you once again asking for the coaches head, but ignoring the truth. The players aren't that good. I don't know if Eakins is good or not, likely not, but I know the players aren't and no coach wins with bad players.

They had 20 good games last year and then sucked down the stretch. Where did they improve under Krueger? They didn't improve under Renney either, because the players aren't that good.

MacTavish needs to improve our blueline and get some beef in our top six..until that happens, we are probably googling McDavid goals next year.

Avatar
#11 **
March 10 2014, 12:03PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
18
cheers

The guy to ask those questions to was Andrew Ference, after all, he is the only one coming form a recent Stanley Cup win.

Avatar
#12 DisappointedFan
March 10 2014, 12:04PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
HugThePost wrote:

Don't think I agree.

There's nothing boring about a team that forechecks and backchecks hard and plays a possession game (see Chicago).

Do you think giving extra reward for more offense will make watching guys like JShultz and Gagner and Eberle (all of whom probably play better defense on NHL14 than in real life) better more entertaining players to watch? Right now all they think about is offense, and they are horrible to watch.

I would argue that the point he is trying to make is that teams would put more effort in scoring tons of goals as opposed to closing up the doors and windows and holding strong when they get the 1-0 lead.

Watching a 1-0 game is the most boring hockey for fans, so what he's suggesting is giving an incentive for teams to try and open up and force the offensive side of the game.

Now maybe a scaling of 1 point for every 5 goals is a bit ridiculous...but it is one possible solution to what is becoming boring hockey to watch.

Avatar
#13 Taylor Gang
March 10 2014, 12:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers

What concerns me the most is the team's breakout habits. Either one or sometimes two players are cherry picking and looking for an easy breakaway, or somebody panics under pressure and just rifles it out of the zone and gives it right back to the opponent. This, in my opinion, is the main reason why Edmonton is hemmed in their zone for seemingly endless periods of time. A change in zone exit strategy could go a long way in terms of possession time.

Avatar
#14 He Who Knows
March 10 2014, 12:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers

Guys not sticking up for each other on this team is going against one of the codes. Where did some of these softies come from? Individualists don't fair well in a team oriented environment.

Avatar
#15 #ThereGoesTheOilers
March 10 2014, 12:18PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

It's fair to ask if our practices compare to other teams, but with due respect to our writers, I can't help but think that there's no substance to this story surrounding Bryz and Smid.

I read both interviews. Both said their new practices were more intense than they're used to. I don't see how this translates into 'shots' at their former organization.

Maybe we're all just a bit insecure as the losingest fans in hockey.

Afterall, if I complement someone else's baking, my wife doesn't automatically assume there's something wrong with hers.

Avatar
#16 Death Metal Nightmare
March 10 2014, 12:21PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers
Jason Gregor wrote:

Your hatred for the coach doesn't allow you to read an article without bias. I never defended his actions. I said I wished they had more intensity in practice, but pointed out that the players aren't a group of aggressive players.

Also it is a fact that the Oilers aren't that big or strong yet. If you go hard in practice on off days they won't be fresh on game days.

You can interpret it however you like, but the fact remains this team's lack of size and aggression is equal in games and practice. I also don't expect a coach to magically make a D team into a B or A team. Eakins might not be the solution, but putting more of the blame on the coach than the players and management is ridiculous. We've seen how that works... Some don't want to face the truth that this group of players don't have the right mix to win, regardless of who is coaching them. Hopefully MacTavish sees it and makes more changes. I suspect he will.

i think people knew LONG ago this wasnt the right mix while media like you were propping up Sam Gagner to be a potential 70 point player while touting the "he's only __ years old..." BS.

his game was apparent in deficiencies that his size and strength are never going to over come at 21+ years old. but people still held that hope there and then they overpaid him at 5 million bucks. then this season "everyone finally comes around". too late, geniuses.

as for the rest of the group, we've known for multiple seasons that this was children mixed with very mediocre-to-poor vets that are forced into roles they can't handle.

and still we had to have the "sexy" coach come in while nothing got fixed on the roster in any qualitative/substantial way.

it's obviously a delicate/micro situation when you're this horrendous but the management has done itself little favor when it falls in love with sad players for too long... we're seeing this trend constantly as they try to think they can outsmart the rest of the league using trash to improve.

if i had to guess, this group of "smart guys" over thinks how to put a team together. they dig so far into detail that they start to sell themselves on mediocre as hell players (Horcoff, Ference, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc) and then just sit in the tar pit. it's time outside perspectives come into this group. their thinking is way too stale. whether it's through firings, etc...

drown in a fishbowl

Avatar
#17 Tim
March 10 2014, 12:21PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers

Gregor, thanks for being the only media guy willing to ask these questions.

I'm not in love with all of Eakins answers, but that's likely because part of me knows the players aren't that good.

At least you gave us some insight into what the coach and players think. Good job.

Avatar
#18 Soccer Steve
March 10 2014, 12:21PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

I come on here once in a while and have my short say and I watch most of the games (at least halfway through). I consider this a tough grind for reasons we all know.

But you know who has it bad? Who I really feel for? The Gregor's, Brownlee's, Willis', Mitchell's, et al. who have to actually write lengthy, meaningful articles of some relevance about this pitiful 'team'.

I mean, Gregor, you talkin' 'bout practice, man. Practice.

Avatar
#19 oiler_head
March 10 2014, 12:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

Thought fersur Gazdic was going to tune Nolan. Its amazing to me that Eakins who played that tough role during his hockey career doesn't appreciate the value of sending those messages now that he's coach.

I was at the PDX Winterhawks game on Friday night against the hated Seattle Thunderbirds. As my friend and I were noting the size difference in teams (Seattle much bigger), one of their big guys hit our guys flush in the numbers into the boards. Who showed up? Dominic Turgeon - that's who. Not a fighter but showed up for his team and team mate. He got pasted (and kudos to the Seattle player who recognized the mismatch and didn't go all out) but was the first person on the scene.

Where has that gone in this version of the Oilers? Why didn't Ference, Hendricks, Fraser, Perron, Smyth, Jones, Joensuu, or are skill guys stand up to Nolan?

Disappointing....

Avatar
#20 Will
March 10 2014, 12:24PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Ugh, I mean I know the rest of the season will be spent again wondering what the Oilers do at the draft but are there no better story lines to follow? How far away is Nuge on his two way play from say, Datsyuk?

This many years into his NHL career, how is Hall stacking up as an LW?

Eberle or Yak, make a case to trade one and what could they net?

Addition by subtraction, just how better off would the OIlers be if Arcobello took over the second line centre job?

Free agent shopping list, is it time to overpay? And if so, who is going to shake lose, and how much money will it cost to gets them? Who are these players? Are they stop gaps until we can develop some of our D prospects or are they long term solutions?

Given the small sample size, just how good is Scrivens anyway? Are we talking Schnider territory?

Avatar
#21 Dog Train
March 10 2014, 12:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

I know that we've had a bunch of different coaches over the years but how long does it take to learn a new system? I understand that there is always teaching to be done but we are 65 games into this coach and we are still hammering on the Xs and Os. Systems are important but bottom line is I want to see more passion out of this hockey club. Nobody sticking up for JJ after taking that sucker punch was a joke.

Avatar
#22 loweblows
March 10 2014, 12:27PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
GoKlefbom wrote:

You don't care about practice? That tells me you have no clue how teams are supposed to improve.

I care about having a plan and sticking with it, something this organization hasn't done for four years.

This fan is sick of fans like you once again asking for the coaches head, but ignoring the truth. The players aren't that good. I don't know if Eakins is good or not, likely not, but I know the players aren't and no coach wins with bad players.

They had 20 good games last year and then sucked down the stretch. Where did they improve under Krueger? They didn't improve under Renney either, because the players aren't that good.

MacTavish needs to improve our blueline and get some beef in our top six..until that happens, we are probably googling McDavid goals next year.

start googling

Avatar
#23 OilClog
March 10 2014, 12:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Rules apply to everything.

Practice the way you play.

Best teams I was ever part of, also practiced their asses off harder then the rest. Everytime regardless of talent.

No one on this team is improving under any of the assistant coaches of this team, can them all.

Avatar
#24 Taylor Gang
March 10 2014, 12:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Will wrote:

Ugh, I mean I know the rest of the season will be spent again wondering what the Oilers do at the draft but are there no better story lines to follow? How far away is Nuge on his two way play from say, Datsyuk?

This many years into his NHL career, how is Hall stacking up as an LW?

Eberle or Yak, make a case to trade one and what could they net?

Addition by subtraction, just how better off would the OIlers be if Arcobello took over the second line centre job?

Free agent shopping list, is it time to overpay? And if so, who is going to shake lose, and how much money will it cost to gets them? Who are these players? Are they stop gaps until we can develop some of our D prospects or are they long term solutions?

Given the small sample size, just how good is Scrivens anyway? Are we talking Schnider territory?

I was thinking that with Scrivens, he looks like Schnieder 2.0

Avatar
#25 sizzay
March 10 2014, 12:30PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Gregor, give me your thoughts here:

2014 1st pick (likely 2nd overall) for Sean Couturier and a second round pick. Perhaps Philly really likes Ekblad and can live with Giroux and Schenn as its 1-2 punch

Gagner + Klefbom + a couple mid round picks for Yandle

Then you take a run at Winnik, Goc and Kulemin this summer

Hall/Couturier/Yakupov

Kulemin/RNH/Eberle

Perron/Goc/Winnik

Smyth/Gordon/Hendricks

Yandle/Petry

Marincin/Schultz

Ference/Fedun or Fraser

I don't know if Yandle is the guy we need but he is an improvement and has been rumored to be available for a couple years.

Avatar
#26 Sailge
March 10 2014, 12:38PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers

Everyone in this organization seems to be pretty good at TALKING, not so much DOING, I'll give em that.....

Avatar
#27 nuge2nail
March 10 2014, 12:39PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Oiler Domination To Follow

Great article.

Now if you can set up an interview with MacT next and find out what he thinks of his current defense and how he plans on improving it.

That should be an interesting read.

Avatar
#28 @Oilanderp
March 10 2014, 12:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Edmonton has scored more goals than LA this year. I wonder why there is such a discrepancy in the standings? ;) LA makes a concerted effort to not let you into the high scoring areas. You know, defense....

Avatar
#29 Old Timer
March 10 2014, 12:41PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
Bucky wrote:

Best way to fix boring defensive hockey.

Give an extra point in the standing for every 5 goals scored in a game.

Win 5-0 Winner gets 3 points loser zero points. Win 10-5 Winner gets 4 points loser gets one point

Teams will try to score more. Fans will be happier and it would be prudent for the coach to think more offensive

I'm not sure your idea would ever fly with the hockey purest crowd but I do think there is some merit in your suggestion.

We need to find some way to convince coaches that scoring goals is important. Give them a reason to score as many as possible and not just kick one in and then play shut down defense the rest of the game.

Avatar
#30 toprightcorner
March 10 2014, 12:43PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Rama Lama wrote:

JG...........I respect your need to defend Dallas.

I for one do not give a rat's ass how the team practices or what the players say about practicing on other teams.

What most fans care about is seeing improvement...........even incremental improvement. If we improved in any metric, fans would probably lay off this guy. The sad fact is we have NOT improved in any area of the game, except dietary may be.

True the team is still not very good but if you think the team has not improved you are mistaken. The team is 1 game under .500 since Dec 27th. Sure it still isn't playoff making winning percentage but it is an improvement.

You have a hate on the coach and you will always be biased by that when having an opinion.

Avatar
#31 nuge2nail
March 10 2014, 12:49PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
sizzay wrote:

Gregor, give me your thoughts here:

2014 1st pick (likely 2nd overall) for Sean Couturier and a second round pick. Perhaps Philly really likes Ekblad and can live with Giroux and Schenn as its 1-2 punch

Gagner + Klefbom + a couple mid round picks for Yandle

Then you take a run at Winnik, Goc and Kulemin this summer

Hall/Couturier/Yakupov

Kulemin/RNH/Eberle

Perron/Goc/Winnik

Smyth/Gordon/Hendricks

Yandle/Petry

Marincin/Schultz

Ference/Fedun or Fraser

I don't know if Yandle is the guy we need but he is an improvement and has been rumored to be available for a couple years.

Oiler Domination To Follow

I would rather overpay for a center like Statsny and keep the draft pick.

Draft Bennett or Reinhert and we finally have some depth at center.

Hopkins - Statsny - Bennett - Gordan

Trade Gagner for a #3-#4 defenseman.

Spend the remaining 30+ million in cap space on Defense, preferably on 2-3 year deals.

Avatar
#32 toprightcorner
March 10 2014, 12:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I agree that the practices need to be pushed to instill those habits and love the Wings mantra of "no bad passes".

I understand with a new coach and system that there will be more whiteboard work on systems play. The fact that through training camp and 65 games they still require a lot of whiteboard time shows how the overall talent level, learning level and structure acceptance level is not good at all.

Not sure if that is not buying in to the system or the system require high quality of execution to succeed that the players cannot provide but it again clearly states that the players are not good enough as a group to be a good team.

To many playing as individuals instead of playing as a team.

Avatar
#33 sizzay
March 10 2014, 12:57PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
nuge2nail wrote:

Oiler Domination To Follow

I would rather overpay for a center like Statsny and keep the draft pick.

Draft Bennett or Reinhert and we finally have some depth at center.

Hopkins - Statsny - Bennett - Gordan

Trade Gagner for a #3-#4 defenseman.

Spend the remaining 30+ million in cap space on Defense, preferably on 2-3 year deals.

If we keep the pick, I want Draisaitl

Avatar
#34 HugThePost
March 10 2014, 12:57PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers
DisappointedFan wrote:

I would argue that the point he is trying to make is that teams would put more effort in scoring tons of goals as opposed to closing up the doors and windows and holding strong when they get the 1-0 lead.

Watching a 1-0 game is the most boring hockey for fans, so what he's suggesting is giving an incentive for teams to try and open up and force the offensive side of the game.

Now maybe a scaling of 1 point for every 5 goals is a bit ridiculous...but it is one possible solution to what is becoming boring hockey to watch.

The Canadian Men's hockey team in Sochi did not score much and they played a possession game featuring heavy backcheck/forecheck (ie. every puck was challenged).

Assuming you watched them, did you find them boring at all?

I would give my left nut to have the Oilers break up the cycle, retrieve the puck and break it out of their zone like Team Canada did, just once per game at this point. It was poetry to watch.

Avatar
#35 sizzay
March 10 2014, 01:03PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
nuge2nail wrote:

Oiler Domination To Follow

I would rather overpay for a center like Statsny and keep the draft pick.

Draft Bennett or Reinhert and we finally have some depth at center.

Hopkins - Statsny - Bennett - Gordan

Trade Gagner for a #3-#4 defenseman.

Spend the remaining 30+ million in cap space on Defense, preferably on 2-3 year deals.

Also that centre depth would get crushed the same as ours right now. Statsny wouldn't thrive here and Bennett is another young guy. We need vets, no more rookie.

Avatar
#36 Will
March 10 2014, 01:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Please, can everyone stop saying the Oilers should be more like Team Canada. I mean we can't even make the playoffs and you think our team should be more like one of the greatest hockey teams ever constructed? Oh, and if we could only play defence like a team who's defence was so good they left off last year's Vezina winner.

Let's make some more realistic goals for our team here everyone. I think being more like Pitsburgh isn't out of the question as their defensive make up isn't that unrealistic.

Avatar
#37 Will
March 10 2014, 01:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@Taylor Gang

It will be interesting to see what he can do with the team next year. I'm equally as excited about Fasth. I know he had a crap showing this year in five games, but last year the guy was incredible. We may have just nabbed the next Ben Bishop.

Avatar
#38 **
March 10 2014, 01:09PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
HugThePost wrote:

The Canadian Men's hockey team in Sochi did not score much and they played a possession game featuring heavy backcheck/forecheck (ie. every puck was challenged).

Assuming you watched them, did you find them boring at all?

I would give my left nut to have the Oilers break up the cycle, retrieve the puck and break it out of their zone like Team Canada did, just once per game at this point. It was poetry to watch.

To me the most remarkable achievement of team Canada was how they played their systems to perfection without really practicing much and barely playing together at all.

Avatar
#39 Will
March 10 2014, 01:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
sizzay wrote:

Also that centre depth would get crushed the same as ours right now. Statsny wouldn't thrive here and Bennett is another young guy. We need vets, no more rookie.

I'm not so sure another rookie would be terrible. It all depends on the rookie. Look at Monahan, that kid is thriving.

Avatar
#40 YAKCITY64
March 10 2014, 01:11PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Man it's like this is Russia and Eakins and his buddies in the media are Putin and the oiler fans are the Russian people. We have lived through all of your promises and propaganda and nothing has changed. The worst thing is like all regimes is you think the people are idiots and you can fool us with your propaganda sorry guys WE ARE NOT FOOLED.

Avatar
#41 **
March 10 2014, 01:12PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

With Lander going back down I guess the great Nordic purge continues.

Avatar
#42 **
March 10 2014, 01:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Wonder if Gustaffson will be coming to NA this summer

Avatar
#43 Oiler Al
March 10 2014, 01:16PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Gregor, great write up , always appreciate you never being shy to ask the question. This was a topic that was bein kicked around by the fans here, without really getting into the in's and out's of the issue.

Thanks. Well done.

PS.. very disappointed Fraser or Gadzic didnt take care of Nolan... he is a bit of a punk that needs a lesson on sucker punching an opponent.

Avatar
#44 DisappointedFan
March 10 2014, 01:16PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

@HugThePost

You're watching the absolute best players in the game, who can break up the cycle, retrieve the puck, and work magic anywhere on the ice. They drastically out-shot their opponents and should have won their games by much higher margins. It was also exciting hockey for you because you're used to watching the losing Oilers play. That is why it was "poetry to watch".

Watch the Minnesota Wild, LA Kings, Tampa Bay Lightning (under Guy), NJ Devils, and you will agree that a hard defensive game is EXTREMELY boring to watch for one simple reason: THEY SIT ON SMALL LEADS.

I've been watching Tampa for years, and when they did their defensive 1-3-1 strategy it was the most boring hockey you would ever watch. Because they'd get their lead with a Lecaviler/StLouis/Richards/Stamkos go ahead goal and just sit on it.

So if the NHL did something to improve this whether it be coaching or rules, I would like to see more offensive games.

Avatar
#45 A-Mc
March 10 2014, 01:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
Bucky wrote:

Best way to fix boring defensive hockey.

Give an extra point in the standing for every 5 goals scored in a game.

Win 5-0 Winner gets 3 points loser zero points. Win 10-5 Winner gets 4 points loser gets one point

Teams will try to score more. Fans will be happier and it would be prudent for the coach to think more offensive

I dont know if that's the solution but i certainly appreciate the suggestion!

Interesting... I must let my mind wander a bit to contemplate what that'd look like over 82 games.

Avatar
#46 **
March 10 2014, 01:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
A-Mc wrote:

I dont know if that's the solution but i certainly appreciate the suggestion!

Interesting... I must let my mind wander a bit to contemplate what that'd look like over 82 games.

Getting rid of the Bettman extra point for surviving until the end of regulation would go a long ways. Winner takes all, no loser points.

Avatar
#47 CaptainLander
March 10 2014, 01:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

You make a great point about the Oil D, never really thought about how having a weak d makes it harder for the forwards to improve as they do not get a regular opportunity to play against really good players.

Same can be said for the d, when the Oil top player are not driving to the net on every play in practice how does the d learn to defend against the Toews of the NHL.

Just a perpetual motion machine of suck.

Avatar
#48 @Oilanderp
March 10 2014, 01:31PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

I am not surprised at all that a lot of time is spent on the whiteboard and diagrams and the teaching aspect. A lot of the players are lost in their own zone. The breakouts are laughable.

As much as everyone likes to talk about how bad our d-men are, I would bet $$$ that even if we had a hall of famer at every position in our top 6 defence we would still not be a playoff team.

Why? Well, imagine the puck is dumped into our zone and YOU are the first d-man on the scene. You have 2 real options:

1. Pass to your d-partner behind the net.

2. Pass to your winger on the half-wall.

3. Pass to your center in front of your own net.

4. Try a stretch pass through many opposition players or ice the puck or put it hard off the glass and out and hope it's not icing.

5. Deke a guy.

If you choose #1, then you are simply restarting this process, and THAT d-man has the same 2 choices.

So pretty much, it is option #2 ALL DAY: move it along the boards to your winger.

And here is where the problems begin. Most of the time the strong-side winger isn't even there. Even when he is there he is usually at a stand-still and easy pickings for a forechecker, or worse the winger is on the wrong side of the puck and is cheating for offence resulting in an easy pickoff and odd-man rush against.

But let's pretend the winger gets the puck on the half-wall. He has 1 real option:

1. Kick it square across to the center.

2. Chip it past the opposing d-man and out, icing it or otherwise relinquishing posession.

3. Try a risky stretch pass cross-ice to the other winger which even if successful will only result in a 1 on 2 attack.

4. Deke a guy.

5. Drop it back to the d-man in which case we repeat the first process all over.

Not many choices are there? The solution? Puck support.The Oilers break out too far apart from each other, leaving the puck carrier with few options. These young forwards seem to think that the only way to score is on the rush and by leaving the zone early.

Until these top 6ers, the core of our team, realize how to defend and support the puck together in their own zone, little progress is going to be made. Until that time, Eakins is going to have to spank these kids and put them to bed without their supper for not doing their homework.

THIS is why teams focus on defense. All the firepower in the world can't help you get out of your own zone. Ekblad or Ehrhoff or both won't change that.

Avatar
#49 A-Mc
March 10 2014, 01:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I really like that tidbit about the Redwings no-bad-passes rule. It's interesting because i think something like that could really help the Oilers.

I think there are a number of games where poor passing is the real culprit to the criticism of poor pace. Every time a pass is missed, the play slows to a crawl or dies. There are many nights that the Oilers just cannot seem to make a clean crisp pass. Conversely, the games where the Oilers are "flying", the passing is excellent!

Avatar
#50 Rama Lama
March 10 2014, 01:43PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
toprightcorner wrote:

True the team is still not very good but if you think the team has not improved you are mistaken. The team is 1 game under .500 since Dec 27th. Sure it still isn't playoff making winning percentage but it is an improvement.

You have a hate on the coach and you will always be biased by that when having an opinion.

No hate is a strong word. I do not hate him at all in fact I like his personality for the most part.

What I HATE is not seeing any improvement and the general inability to motivate his star players.

If the players are to blame ( including the stars of the team) then bench them. Bring in AHL players to send the message to the stars that NOT giving a total effort has ramifications!!

Has Dallas done that.........no and that's a big part of coaching, do you not agree?

Comments are closed for this article.