THE OILERS STINK BECAUSE . . .

Robin Brownlee
March 10 2014 05:40PM

83-Hemsky-9

Everybody has an opinion about why the Edmonton Oilers have struggled mightily to show significant signs of progress four years into their rebuild, and former Oiler Ales Hemsky added to that lengthy list today. Let's see if we've about got it covered . . .

The Oilers stink because:

  • A.   They have too many small forwards who are too much alike.
  • B.   Dallas Eakins is a lousy coach (and should be fired).
  • C.   They don't have a legitimate first pairing on defense and don't have nearly enough proven NHL defensemen.
  • D.   They don't have enough grit and size throughout the roster.
  • E.    Steve Smith and Kelly Buchberger remain employed as assistant coaches.
  • F.    Eakins is in over his head and needs another associate coach, preferably with experience as an NHL head coach, to bolster his staff.
  • G.   GM Craig MacTavish, like predecessor Steve Tambellini, has the wrong mix of players.
  • H.   MacTavish and Tambellini have tinkered too much with the bottom six forwards and third-pairing defensemen without making enough changes with players who get the most ice time.
  • I.       Owner Daryl Katz refuses to fire friend Kevin Lowe, who still has a significant say in player personnel decisions.
  • J.      The team's pro scouting staff couldn’t find a clue with a map and a flashlight.
  • K.   Eakins has butchered a power play that looked to be on its way under Ralph Krueger and has spent far too much time re-inventing the hockey wheel for a rookie NHL head coach.
  • L.    Young core players like Taylor Hall, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins and Jordan Eberle haven't yet stepped up and shown the leadership needed to guide the team back to contention.

The latest tidbit is courtesy of Hemsky, who added another item to the pile in an interview with the Ottawa Citizen today. So, does the Dirty Dozen above about cover it or have I missed a reason or two?

THAT WAS EASY

Dallas Eakins 16

Thumb through the archives of sites like Oilersnation and you'll find volumes of loser's lament, venom, fear and loathing and reasons why the Oilers are about to miss the playoffs, by a lot, for an eighth straight season.

Everybody, the writers who contribute here, people who stop by to have their say and fans in general have pointed a finger in the blame game, and with the amount of ineptitude we've seen, there's plenty to go around.

While I lean most heavily on items A, C, D, E, F, G and H – I must admit the Hemsky comments today do cause one to take pause – it's safe to say there's a multitude of issues facing this edition of the Oilers. Pointing at just one or two areas isn't going to solve much.

We're seeing that already with changes made in goal. Ben Scrivens has been superb since arriving, but better goaltending by itself – it couldn't have been worse than what Devan Dubnyk and Jason LaBarbera provided – isn’t going to lift this team back into contention.

We're all guilty, to some degree, of over-simplifying the work that remains. "Get bigger and tougher. It'll be fine." "Trade for a legit No. 1 defenseman (and a playing partner) and we'll be on the way." "Fire Eakins . . ."

A LITTLE OF THIS, A LITTLE OF THAT

Craig MacTavish2

What's starting to sink in is the flaws in the roster and the organization as they are structured now are many and multi-layered. The Oilers aren't just one or two or three players away from contention. They aren't (another) new head coach away from turning the corner. The Oilers aren't a Shea Weber short of being a powerhouse.

The Oilers aren't just a busy of summer of work by MacTavish away from getting this sorted out. When it's been this bad this long, everything from the top down has to be looked at. That will take time. I'm not offering up that observation as a free pass for MacTavish. I'm just coming to grips with how broken this organization is. The closer I look, the more profound it seems.

Now, after much fiddling with the fringes of the roster over recent seasons by Tambellini and MacTavish, comes Hemsky on the kids, the core. They are the one component so many fans out there have considered the one sure thing that so much of the hope being sold is hung on.

Add that to the list.

Listen to Robin Brownlee Wednesdays and Thursdays from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. on the Jason Gregor Show on TEAM 1260.

Aceb4a1816f5fa09879a023b07d1a9b4
A sports writer since 1983, including stints at The Edmonton Journal and The Sun 1989-2007, I happily co-host the Jason Gregor Show on TSN 1260 twice a week and write when so inclined. Have the best damn lawn on the internet. Most important, I am Sam's dad. Follow me on Twitter at Robin_Brownlee. Or don't.
Avatar
#1 mike
March 10 2014, 06:00PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

Good read, Brownlee.

Avatar
#2 J.R.
March 10 2014, 06:01PM
Trash it!
15
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers

I choose B. (Although I know there is more to it than just craptacular coaching)

Avatar
#3 Harry
March 10 2014, 06:04PM
Trash it!
78
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Maybe we should add to the list the fact that Hemsky had 7 goals by the trade deadline. Funny how Hemsky doesnt talk about his own terrible play. Once a loser always a loser I guess. So glad that pylon is off the team

Avatar
#4 Surly Duff
March 10 2014, 06:04PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
45
cheers

M. All of the above.

Avatar
#6 ShakyDS
March 10 2014, 06:14PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
28
cheers

When I clicked on the link for this article on twitter, I fully expected it to be the longest article in ON history. Thanks for summing up years of reasons and excuses so briefly Robin.

Avatar
#7 Spoils
March 10 2014, 06:18PM
Trash it!
27
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

all true, but we are still winning the cup in 3 years.

Avatar
#8 Quicksilver ballet
March 10 2014, 06:18PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
18
cheers

It's hard to have any level of success when losing has the annual luster of a Hall, Hopkins, Yakupov or an Ekblad. This is clearly managements goal from day 1. Let this club hit the ice without the important pieces in place every fall to insure Kevin Lowes goal is carried out.

Firing coaches and GM's is all the fanbase will get till these kids mature on their own without supervision it seems. It's clearly been proven, Kevin knows as much about losing, than he does about winning.

Avatar
#9 YakZ
March 10 2014, 06:20PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
38
cheers

Was there no opportunity to bring Eakins as an associate coach to Kreuger before we canned him after a shortened post lockout season?

Avatar
#10 Derian Hatcher
March 10 2014, 06:23PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
44
cheers

Just a simple question if I may. Paul Maurice record is 11-5 (I stand to be corrected on this) since taking over the jets. by all accounts the team is playing better. It is safe to assume he has made adjustments in practice, games, preparation, culture etc. he has a ton of experience and it shows. Conversely, in my opinion Eakins' inexperience also shows on a regular basis. Nothing against the man, but he is learning on the job is he not? So my question...was he the right fit for what this team needs? Is he the right fit going forward?

Avatar
#11 Danger Pay
March 10 2014, 06:23PM
Trash it!
38
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers
Harry wrote:

Maybe we should add to the list the fact that Hemsky had 7 goals by the trade deadline. Funny how Hemsky doesnt talk about his own terrible play. Once a loser always a loser I guess. So glad that pylon is off the team

Agreed, Hemsky has been mailing it in for a while and I'd also like to point out the most selfish play in hockey, the offside caused, I swear to God, Hemsky caused at least 2 offsides a game which just kills momentum and it was even worse when the Oilers couldn't win faceoffs!

Hemsky... rhymes with Gretzky so give him $5 Mil per (at least that how I think how Tambo and Lowe came up with that contract).

Avatar
#12 I AM KEVIN L.
March 10 2014, 06:31PM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

The Oilers do not stink. The fans go to see the games, they like the team.

Avatar
#13 Czar
March 10 2014, 06:31PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers

@Derian Hatcher

I think it was Brownlee that suggested bringing in Maurice after a night on "the panel" where he wasn't roasting the Oilers like the rest of them. Another missed opportunity to get some experience behind the bench, NHL experience.

Avatar
#14 hemi
March 10 2014, 06:33PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

That is one very long list! I used to make fun of the leaf fans for always supporting that "never win anything franchise". Mind you, I grew with a hate for that team (still do) that may have jaded a proper perspective on what fans really are. With my own fan base support of the Oil that I have given to this team since day one, I must be a hypocrite. I am no better than a leaf fan.....depressing!

So, with the blind support that the Oil have received by many a person in this fair city and from other areas of the country and elsewhere, does that make us part of the problem or are we part of the solution? I just wish that we didn't suck this much for so damn long. Dare I say, Go Oil Go?

Avatar
#15 kdunbar
March 10 2014, 06:35PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

THIS... lean most heavily on items A, C, D, E, F, G and H –

and L (but I think this was hoisting it upon the kids without them needing to earn it)

Avatar
#16 Cold Hard Truth
March 10 2014, 06:37PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers

Indeed. It is a red-herring to assume it's one problem, and that the Oiler's are one fix away from catapulting into the standings.

The best case scenario to turn this organization around would be to have a third-party consultant -- someone with credentials from outside the organization, i.e. not Messier -- make a complete evaluation of the organization, and then go from there. If MacTavish's performance as GM is deemed to be subpar, then he should be dismissed, if not, not.

I know - I'm dreaming. Katz would never allow a third-party consultant come in and call the shots.

Therein lies the problem (Which you can add to the list, Robin).

Avatar
#17 VK63
March 10 2014, 06:38PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
32
cheers

So i guess the Assistant captain letters these kids are wearing were a tad premature? ;)

Avatar
#18 Young Oil
March 10 2014, 06:40PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
26
cheers

To me, it isn't about getting bigger and tougher, it's about getting players who are going to give their all every single shift, in all areas of the rink. You don't need to be big or tough to take the initiative to hit a guy after he takes a pass. I'm not saying we need to goon it up, but at least make yourself hard to play against, and don't let the other team make easy passes. Make them earn every inch of ice.

The sad thing is, the two players who have been by far the best at this (Arcobello and Pitlick) are in the minors. The players need to step up and take the initiative to be harder to play against,and the coaches and management need to reward the players that consistently play that way instead of keeping them in the minors. If Hall, Eberle, Gagner etc. can't learn to play on both sides of the puck after 200+ games in the NHL, then they need to be moved out for someone who can.

Trading a first liner for a second liner and a top 4 D isn't a terribly rare move, and it could help this team immensely.

Avatar
#19 Cold Hard Truth
March 10 2014, 06:42PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
26
cheers

I think much of the problems you've listed stem from the same source: patronage. The Oilers organization, rather than hiring and promote personnel based on merit, performance, and credentials, is an old boys club that hires its friends. It operates as a club, not a business.

Now, hiring your friends isn't inherently wrong; however, when your friends are unqualified, and when your friendship prevents you from firing your unqualified friend, then it is wrong. This is exactly the case of the Oilers, i.e. MacTavish hiring, and the fact that Smith and Buchberger are still around.

I think this is the biggest problem which compounds all the others. Add it to the list.

Avatar
#20 Chongler
March 10 2014, 06:44PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

A,C,E! A can be used to fix C, but E has a life of its own and should be considered the next priority as far as personnel management goes. It probably won't be, but I see the associate coaches as the greatest hurdle, once the roster is fixed, that would change this team from a playoff spot push to a legit contender.

Avatar
#21 Cold Hard Truth
March 10 2014, 06:46PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
34
cheers

Often I take pity on the Edmonton Oilers and the fans, but then I read comments from blindfaithers like Zarny and my heart hardens and I realize that the Oilers are exactly where they should be.

All this losing didn't happen on accident. It isn't bad luck. The Oilers are not cursed.

It is the product of years of incompetent management, who've been consistently propped up by the owner (Napoleon), the blindfaithers, and the impotent media pundits who are afraid to write anything remotely critical of the managers.

Avatar
#22 Big Cap
March 10 2014, 06:48PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
48
cheers

I 110% Blame Eakins!!!

Instead of coaching to our players strengths like the the PP, speed, and creativity. He insisted they play HIS style.

Because his years of NHL coaching experience proved that his new PP, defensive, and offensive systems where very effective. He insisted they follow his game plan.

He also chose a journeyman to be our captain, just because he's huge into fitness and thinks like he does.

He tore down our once proud tradition of past great players and photos in the dressing room. Imagine a first year rookie head coach doing that in MTL.

He chose our two knuckle head assistant coaches. What is Bucky gonna teach RNH about the PP or being a 1st line Centre. Same goes with Smith teaching Schultz and Petry.

Eakins can't even communicate with his players on the bench mid game. He's the only coach who stands there leaning against the glass with his hands behind his back.

Eakins is a joke. We're playing like an AHL team, because he is an AHL coach.

Cue the soon to be discussion with Hall to MacT that he's ready to move on!

Avatar
#23 I AM KEVIN L.
March 10 2014, 06:49PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

One word: KLOWE.

Avatar
#25 Cervantes
March 10 2014, 07:02PM
Trash it!
19
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers

I think you copy a couple of points, and they can be reduced to a bit shorter and less terrifying of a list.

Coaching - Eakins tried to do too much. He's learned his lesson and has clearly reduced his reach as of late. Now the coaching staff needs to reflect the coach. He is a good general developer of players, but he is not a PP specialist (as shown by his team record here and with the Marlies), he is not particularly strong at developing defensemen, and he does not have NHL coaching experience to know the little tricks that help you win. The Oil need to add 2 assistant coaches that collectively cover these 3 failings, so Eakins can focus on his strengths. At least one of Bucky or Smith need to move on to make room, and we need to bring in an experienced NHL assistant coach, and the next coming of Charlie Huddy for D development.

Players - Barring an incredibly Bold (tm) move, our Top 6 is set. Hall/RNH/Ebs, Perron/Gags/Yak. Of those, Perron is the obvious agitator, but Yak and Hall both have shown they don't back down, and that'll get more noticeable as they add another year of muscle on. The obvious bait here is Gagner. Gordon looked really solid as a 2C when Gags was out, and Arco has better underlying numbers in his Top 6 time. Gagner for a larger, rougher 2/3C, even one who needs a year of development, is entirely plausible with the replacements we have already available in the system. However, bottom line, looking with envy at the Kings and Sharks will not help. They spent years slowly getting players who are 2" and 20lbs heavier than ours. We're not going to buy our way into suddenly having a large team. Play the hand you're dealt.

The bottom 6 - They're more important than we're giving them credit for, and weaker than we realize. Right now, Gordon is spending his whole game doing the heavy lifting for the top 6, while the 4th line is just spinning it's wheels. The actual, hockey purpose of a 3rd and 4th line is to be able to split ~20 minutes a night taking PK and DZ responsibilities and push the river the right way. Right now there's only 2 or 3 players who can do that. As a result, our top 6 play more minutes than is ideal. The role that Gordon/Hendricks/Jones have been doing is perfect, but we need a 4th line that is similar. As much as I like their moxie, none of Smith/Gazdic/Joennsu are getting it done, and it weakens the whole team as a result. Gordon is getting run off his feet, the top 6 are putting in more minutes than they should, and we're spending more D zone time as a result. As much as everyone dumps on "tinkering with the 4th line", it's incredibly important, and we've had too many swings and misses for what isn't an incredibly hard role to fill. I'm hoping that Henricks as 3LW is an attempt by the organization to appease him after we did an end-run around his rejection over the summer, and next season sees him as 4C, with a pair of wingers who can handle 10 minutes a night of hard minutes.

Defense - it's obvious, everyone would love a new top pairing, but that would cost more than we can muster. Much like bottom 6 / top 6, I think D choices trickle down. We don't need a pair of Shea Weber's, but another competent top 4 D to even out the minutes. Petry is underrated by the fan base, but he's a legit top 4, even if he is getting an inexplicable lack of PP minutes. Ferrence is a solid 3/4. If Schultz can progress a bit more he'd be a solid 3/4 as well, he's not quite there yet. Marincin is doing well in a small sample size, an ambitious observer would also pencil him in Top 4. The organization doesn't seem sold of Fedun, but the last few years would tell every observer he is a legit NHL defender, even at bottom 6.

Now, if we can slot in a top 4 defender, what happens to that list? Everyone gets pushed down a peg. Is it possible? Meszaros got picked up this trade deadline for cheap. McDonald as well. As nice as it would be, we don't need to spend on a defender who's good for 5+ years, just legit top 4 minutes for a year or two, so Nurse/Klefbom/Gernat/Musil can all mature and emerge. Yes, a top minutes defender would be lovely. But it's not likely to happen, unless we move a top 6.

Anyways, what does all this rambling mean? That there's work to do, but it's not the impossible mountain that everyone seems to think. We're not firing the coach again, we're not pulling off a blockbuster trade for Nash or Weber. Ekblad is not a rookie Top 2 NHL defenseman.

The realistic fine tuning on the rebuild is:

2 assistant coaches for PP, young D, NHL experience. A rebuilt bottom 6 to take more minutes on, push the river, and handle a bit of offense too. Of the existing, only Gordon, Hendricks, Gazdic (13th F I hope), and Jones would be acceptable. Adding experienced players who can move up, similar to Dustin Brown, would be ideal. A single top 4 defender who has 2 good years in him before he starts to decline. Either a 28-30 year old free agent who can play 20 minutes a night, or a younger guy who needs a change of scenery (Tyler Myers).

The resulting change of minutes distribution for all the lines would let everyone succeed, and would definitely push us in the right direction next season. I think everyone is getting carried away proclaiming all our weakness requires massive shifts. We look with envy at the Sharks and Kings? They spent a decade working hard to get forwards who are 2" and 20lbs heavier than ours. We're not going to emulate them with trades. Play the hand you've been dealt. We're not that bad off.

The only Bold(tm) move I can see coming would be Gags moving before his NTC kicks in. If that resulted in a bigger, rougher 2/3C, that'd be great. Gordon can handle 3/4C, and Arco and Lander can come in and actually play real minutes with real players.

Anyways, sorry for the wall of text. It's just getting a little stale seeing everyone Chicken Little over the Oil. We're not that far off, we just need better distribution of minutes, and players who can handle it.

Avatar
#26 Anton
March 10 2014, 07:03PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
30
cheers

I think there's a misunderstanding, the team is supposed to be bad simply because this team is not ready. Fire Eakins is not because this team is bad, fire Eakins is because he causes more problems than solving it. The regress of team performance is a bigger issue than this team is just simply bad. Fire Eakins is not meant to fix the problem, fire Eakins is meant to stop the never ending downward spiral. Again, anyone with more realistic understanding of this team should know the expectation of this team is trying to stay competitive. It may not be one or two problems with this team, but fix them one-by-one is still needed right? Just because Oilers have lots of issues doesn't mean that managements should just sit on their collective ass and pray for the best right?

Fire Eakins! Fire Eakins! Fire Eakins!

Avatar
#27 Rama Lama
March 10 2014, 07:12PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

Yes RB you nailed it .......there are too many things to consider and yes we fans like to whine........it make us feel better.

I would like to add some positive news if you let me. I for one love Mac T's approach which is taking action. All his moves may not work, but at least he is trying, something that never happened under Mr. Dithers.

If Klowe with his limited vision can land Pronger, Mac T will hopefully have the same fortune.

I know I always pick on Mr. Vanity and his hair, but he will be gone soon enough.......if there is one prediction that is guaranteed to be correct, it's that loser coaches eventually get fired.

After that I expect we will be on the road to 500 again and then onwards and upwards!!

Avatar
#28 ThatButthurtOilersFan
March 10 2014, 07:12PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
32
cheers

New drinking game...

1. Get dry gin.

2. Have a shot whenever a former Oilers says something bad about A) the team or b) the management.

3. Throw up all over your couch, because you had too much gin.

Avatar
#29 mesa
March 10 2014, 07:15PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

A,B,C,D,E,F,G ,H,I,J,K .and cause they never mentored by good players i do not agree with L.

Avatar
#30 Oiltown3000
March 10 2014, 07:16PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Can't they put OKC or Oil Kings games on TV? Because I'm sick and tired of watching a team that loses a lot.

Avatar
#31 Shifty203
March 10 2014, 07:17PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers
VK63 wrote:

So i guess the Assistant captain letters these kids are wearing were a tad premature? ;)

Many players over the years have said that leaders will lead, regardless of who's wearing the A's and C's. This is why I disagreed with giving Hall the C this last summer.

There's one of two things that can be inferred from what we are seeing this year:

1. Hall is unable to unwilling to lead.

2. Hall is leading, and this consistently lazy half-assed play by the team is the result of his leadership.

Now, that's not to say Hall sucks by any stretch, he's an amazing player. I just haven't seen anything from him at all to believe he deserves the C. He's been handed enough opportunities while he's been here, its time for him to earn one.

I also don't believe this team is as bad as they show in the standings, I still say it laziness and a lack of commitment. How many individuals have stepped up and improved? How often do we hear of slacking in practices? How often do they stand up for each other in scrums? There is a severe lack of pride on this team.

Avatar
#32 BC BOY
March 10 2014, 07:17PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

I have to disagree with you RB.

JW hit it right on the spot earlier today. If the oilers had quality NHL dman this season would completely different and we would probably be in a playoff spot or at least competing for one.

Right now the oiler forwards have to pretty much play perfect hockey top from bottom to win, or ben scrivens has to stand on his head. Our defence can't break up cycles, they can't co-ordinate a solid breakout, they can't play against other teams top lines, they get eaten alive from a defensive zone faceoff, they can't quaterback a pp. The list goes on and on.

Our forwards have proven they can produce against NHL teams. And yes they aren't the best defensively but no player in the NHL would look like a stud playing with a defence group made up of bottom pairing guys.

There might be one or two teams in the NHL that would be succesful with our defence group but there has to be at least 10-12 teams that would be successful with our forward groups.

Avatar
#33 Oiltown3000
March 10 2014, 07:17PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
38
cheers
Cervantes wrote:

I think you copy a couple of points, and they can be reduced to a bit shorter and less terrifying of a list.

Coaching - Eakins tried to do too much. He's learned his lesson and has clearly reduced his reach as of late. Now the coaching staff needs to reflect the coach. He is a good general developer of players, but he is not a PP specialist (as shown by his team record here and with the Marlies), he is not particularly strong at developing defensemen, and he does not have NHL coaching experience to know the little tricks that help you win. The Oil need to add 2 assistant coaches that collectively cover these 3 failings, so Eakins can focus on his strengths. At least one of Bucky or Smith need to move on to make room, and we need to bring in an experienced NHL assistant coach, and the next coming of Charlie Huddy for D development.

Players - Barring an incredibly Bold (tm) move, our Top 6 is set. Hall/RNH/Ebs, Perron/Gags/Yak. Of those, Perron is the obvious agitator, but Yak and Hall both have shown they don't back down, and that'll get more noticeable as they add another year of muscle on. The obvious bait here is Gagner. Gordon looked really solid as a 2C when Gags was out, and Arco has better underlying numbers in his Top 6 time. Gagner for a larger, rougher 2/3C, even one who needs a year of development, is entirely plausible with the replacements we have already available in the system. However, bottom line, looking with envy at the Kings and Sharks will not help. They spent years slowly getting players who are 2" and 20lbs heavier than ours. We're not going to buy our way into suddenly having a large team. Play the hand you're dealt.

The bottom 6 - They're more important than we're giving them credit for, and weaker than we realize. Right now, Gordon is spending his whole game doing the heavy lifting for the top 6, while the 4th line is just spinning it's wheels. The actual, hockey purpose of a 3rd and 4th line is to be able to split ~20 minutes a night taking PK and DZ responsibilities and push the river the right way. Right now there's only 2 or 3 players who can do that. As a result, our top 6 play more minutes than is ideal. The role that Gordon/Hendricks/Jones have been doing is perfect, but we need a 4th line that is similar. As much as I like their moxie, none of Smith/Gazdic/Joennsu are getting it done, and it weakens the whole team as a result. Gordon is getting run off his feet, the top 6 are putting in more minutes than they should, and we're spending more D zone time as a result. As much as everyone dumps on "tinkering with the 4th line", it's incredibly important, and we've had too many swings and misses for what isn't an incredibly hard role to fill. I'm hoping that Henricks as 3LW is an attempt by the organization to appease him after we did an end-run around his rejection over the summer, and next season sees him as 4C, with a pair of wingers who can handle 10 minutes a night of hard minutes.

Defense - it's obvious, everyone would love a new top pairing, but that would cost more than we can muster. Much like bottom 6 / top 6, I think D choices trickle down. We don't need a pair of Shea Weber's, but another competent top 4 D to even out the minutes. Petry is underrated by the fan base, but he's a legit top 4, even if he is getting an inexplicable lack of PP minutes. Ferrence is a solid 3/4. If Schultz can progress a bit more he'd be a solid 3/4 as well, he's not quite there yet. Marincin is doing well in a small sample size, an ambitious observer would also pencil him in Top 4. The organization doesn't seem sold of Fedun, but the last few years would tell every observer he is a legit NHL defender, even at bottom 6.

Now, if we can slot in a top 4 defender, what happens to that list? Everyone gets pushed down a peg. Is it possible? Meszaros got picked up this trade deadline for cheap. McDonald as well. As nice as it would be, we don't need to spend on a defender who's good for 5+ years, just legit top 4 minutes for a year or two, so Nurse/Klefbom/Gernat/Musil can all mature and emerge. Yes, a top minutes defender would be lovely. But it's not likely to happen, unless we move a top 6.

Anyways, what does all this rambling mean? That there's work to do, but it's not the impossible mountain that everyone seems to think. We're not firing the coach again, we're not pulling off a blockbuster trade for Nash or Weber. Ekblad is not a rookie Top 2 NHL defenseman.

The realistic fine tuning on the rebuild is:

2 assistant coaches for PP, young D, NHL experience. A rebuilt bottom 6 to take more minutes on, push the river, and handle a bit of offense too. Of the existing, only Gordon, Hendricks, Gazdic (13th F I hope), and Jones would be acceptable. Adding experienced players who can move up, similar to Dustin Brown, would be ideal. A single top 4 defender who has 2 good years in him before he starts to decline. Either a 28-30 year old free agent who can play 20 minutes a night, or a younger guy who needs a change of scenery (Tyler Myers).

The resulting change of minutes distribution for all the lines would let everyone succeed, and would definitely push us in the right direction next season. I think everyone is getting carried away proclaiming all our weakness requires massive shifts. We look with envy at the Sharks and Kings? They spent a decade working hard to get forwards who are 2" and 20lbs heavier than ours. We're not going to emulate them with trades. Play the hand you've been dealt. We're not that bad off.

The only Bold(tm) move I can see coming would be Gags moving before his NTC kicks in. If that resulted in a bigger, rougher 2/3C, that'd be great. Gordon can handle 3/4C, and Arco and Lander can come in and actually play real minutes with real players.

Anyways, sorry for the wall of text. It's just getting a little stale seeing everyone Chicken Little over the Oil. We're not that far off, we just need better distribution of minutes, and players who can handle it.

Too long don't want to read that

Avatar
#34 Sevenseven
March 10 2014, 07:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

The whole alphabet. When you are this bad for this long? Maybe the whole group of first rounders is not as good as we had hoped. You say you cant judge a draft class until five years after a draft? 4/6 of the top 6 players havent seen 5 years in the nhl. We really need to use 1 or 2 of those players to get what is lacking on this team. Or at least a part of what is lacking.

Avatar
#35 Oil Can
March 10 2014, 07:25PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers

I said it last year at this time and I will say it again. Hire Brent Sutter before someone else does. Then let him replace ALL of the assistant coaches, including the goal tending coach before he ruins Scrivens and Fasth. Or do we wait until someone else hires Brent and then we are on here saying, look at the job he is doing with his new team, just like Maurice, Hitchcock, and the others in Montreal, L.A., Anaheim, Dallas, ect. All NHL coaches who took struggling teams to almost instant success. Yes we might still need a couple of line up changes, but at least then Mac.T. would know what exactly he has and doesn't have. And maybe Sutter can get the players to play with pride, heart and intensity.

Avatar
#36 Young Oil
March 10 2014, 07:27PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
26
cheers
Oiltown3000 wrote:

Too long don't want to read that

Then why do you comment and make all of us scroll through it again haha?

Avatar
#37 Eat #@$% Toronto
March 10 2014, 07:33PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Yes,you did forget at least one....They've changed coaches four outa the last five seasons.

Avatar
#38 Harry
March 10 2014, 07:35PM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Danger Pay wrote:

Agreed, Hemsky has been mailing it in for a while and I'd also like to point out the most selfish play in hockey, the offside caused, I swear to God, Hemsky caused at least 2 offsides a game which just kills momentum and it was even worse when the Oilers couldn't win faceoffs!

Hemsky... rhymes with Gretzky so give him $5 Mil per (at least that how I think how Tambo and Lowe came up with that contract).

Hemsky was in his prime years when all this rebuild talk started. Lets face it he wasnt part of the solution and was part of the problem.

Look at his production when he was the #1 offensive guy on this team. Two words jump out to me, inconsistent and disappointing. Furthermore it was no secret that he was lazy during games and practices.

For him to dump on Hall Nuge Ebs and Yak is the definition of a hypocrit and in itself is LAZY!!!

Avatar
#39 Oiltown3000
March 10 2014, 07:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
Young Oil wrote:

Then why do you comment and make all of us scroll through it again haha?

Good point

Avatar
#40 hoss
March 10 2014, 07:41PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

@Robin

You are referring the the Ottawa Star article right? Hemsky was right, he didn't blast the team or pile on anything more that we did not already know. The kids/core need to lead this team and the fans deserve the playoffs. That was the just of what he said.

Robin I have read your articles since you were with the Sun and are my favourite writer on this site. The one thing I always see though regarding Hemsky is the constant negativity towards him and I will just never understand it.

Avatar
#41 Anton
March 10 2014, 07:45PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
Eat #@$% Toronto wrote:

Yes,you did forget at least one....They've changed coaches four outa the last five seasons.

So, it won't hurt to fire another one right? Unless you like to have Eakins horrendous coaching skill to remain and make this team suck even more, by in a way secure Oilers chance to get McDavid. If this team ever want to see any progress (not winning, mind you) then you know the words:

Fire Eakins! Fire Eakins! Fire Eakins!

Avatar
#42 Quinn the Eskimo
March 10 2014, 07:47PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers
I AM KEVIN L. wrote:

The Oilers do not stink. The fans go to see the games, they like the team.

I agree with that. The Oil still have a winning streak going, they threaten the net a lot more, the roster changes are good ones and I believe management has heard the voice of the faithful in one discarded jersey. I like watching the team this year. Continually saying the Oilers Suck drains fan enthusiasm and perhaps fosters a losing culture. This blog would do itself a favour by being less dour. It's hockey! Be happy. Jebus.

Avatar
#44 Anton
March 10 2014, 07:50PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Quinn the Eskimo wrote:

I agree with that. The Oil still have a winning streak going, they threaten the net a lot more, the roster changes are good ones and I believe management has heard the voice of the faithful in one discarded jersey. I like watching the team this year. Continually saying the Oilers Suck drains fan enthusiasm and perhaps fosters a losing culture. This blog would do itself a favour by being less dour. It's hockey! Be happy. Jebus.

Thank you Chicago Cubs fan.

Avatar
#45 sintaxi
March 10 2014, 07:52PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

Hemsky, I love you buddy but it was your job to show these kids how to play. It was your team to lead but you weren't getting the job done so they hand to bring in Ference to wear the "C" and pass the torch prematurely to the kids. You were given every opportunity to make this your team and be the solution to the problem you are describing.

btw - great game the other night. still rooting for you.

Avatar
#46 bazmagoo
March 10 2014, 07:52PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

I respect Hemsky's opinion and I think it likely has some validity to it, but his comments also comes across as a little jaded. His latest scoring spree will likely dry up once a new contract is signed, just a hunch. He likes playing in the big games and is good in those situations, but he was never really a driving force in getting us to the playoffs (except perhaps in 2006). NHL players need to play their hearts out every night to get to the promised land, or at least I would assume they do. Time for the young guns to step it up!

One more thing to note, Mark Arcobello now has 24 points in 12 games and is plus 10 down in OKC.

Avatar
#47 Rick Stroppel
March 10 2014, 07:53PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers
YakZ wrote:

Was there no opportunity to bring Eakins as an associate coach to Kreuger before we canned him after a shortened post lockout season?

EAKINS THINKS HE IS SOMETHING SPECIAL

I am almost certain that Eakins WAS offered the associate coach position and turned it down and said it was HC or nothing. He probably told MacTavish that he was being hotly pursued as HC by Vancouver (which may or may not have been true).

One of the many infuriating things about Eakins is his arrogance. Taking down the 1980's memorabilia...WOW! I really think he thought he was going to make Edmonton forget about the team that won 5 Stanley Cups.

Eakins should have been fired faster than you can say "George Burnett". Instead he will stick around until about 20-30 games into next season. If the team is not in a playoff position (or really contending) Lowe and MacTavish will fire him...just in time to make another inexperienced, impulsive hire as HC.

Avatar
#48 Spydyr
March 10 2014, 07:55PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
16
cheers

OK you are 18 starting your first job say you are making 50k a year.Not bad change for a first job.Even though you really have done nothing special the boss sees potential in you.He gives you a six fold raise anyhow.The raise is guaranteed the next six years.So you have done nothing except show potential now you are 20 making 350k a year guaranteed.

Now change the numbers to to NHL money 6 million for the next 6 years.You just might lose some desire to improve.

It shows.

Avatar
#49 Spydyr
March 10 2014, 07:58PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

M. "The Braintrust"

Avatar
#50 bazmagoo
March 10 2014, 07:58PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@Spydyr

I agree there is something to be said for the motivating factor of money, I'm often on this site talking about the jump in salary from the AHL to NHL. But the young guns didn't get to where they are because money is their ultimate motivation. No way they accept losing on a long term basis, they are far too competitive.

Comments are closed for this article.