Edmonton Oilers recall Anton Lander, again

Jonathan Willis
March 12 2014 03:57PM

51-Lander-1

On Wednesday, the Edmonton Oilers announced that Anton Lander had been recalled from the minors on an emergency basis. It's the second time in four days the team has brought Lander up due to being down to less than 12 forwards.

As we found out last time this happened, the recall doesn't necessarily mean that Lander will get any NHL game action. The Oilers may have a player who is banged up but a gameday decision, but they can't wait until the actual day of the game to recall Lander because at that point it would be too late.

Sam Gagner

It's likely that Lander's up as insurance for Sam Gagner. He took a hit from Matt Cooke late in the Oilers' win over Minnesota, and didn't skate in practice on Wednesday; head coach Dallas Eakins said that he had "tweaked his ankle" and that they felt rest was what was best for Gagner. 

If Gagner can play, it seems probable that the Oilers would return Lander to the minors so as to avoid burning a recall. Edmonton only gets four post-deadline (non-emergency) recalls, and they've used two of them (on Philip Larsen and Oscar Klefbom). 

If Gagner can't play, though, this is a great chance to get a look at Lander in a role other than uber-conservative fourth liner. Gagner's been playing between Taylor Hall and David Perron, so it's possible that Lander would plug right into that slot. Alternatively, the top-six could be rejigged, which would leave Lander with two of Hall, Perron, Jordan Eberle and Nail Yakupov. It's not likely that Boyd Gordon would get bumped out of third line duty, and it's virtually certain that Ryan Smyth won't move up. 

So it's an all or nothing situation. Either Gagner will be well enough to play and Lander will sit, or Lander will have a great chance between quality players to show that he should be in the Oilers' plans beyond this season. 

RECENTLY BY JONATHAN WILLIS

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 Taylor Gang
March 12 2014, 04:08PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
79
cheers

The second line spot is up for grabs.

Seize the moment Lander.

Avatar
#2 bwar
March 12 2014, 04:08PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
60
cheers

While he might not play, man is he racking up the frequent flier miles.

Avatar
#3 **
March 12 2014, 04:13PM
Trash it!
20
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
bwar wrote:

While he might not play, man is he racking up the frequent flier miles.

The Oilers are.

Avatar
#4 Will
March 12 2014, 04:17PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
34
cheers

I hope they do give him a bump on the second line to see what he can do.

I also hope they sign a legit second line centre in the off season. Stasny, Legwand, all of the above.

Avatar
#5 John Chambers
March 12 2014, 04:18PM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Cheers
38
cheers

Gagner has been playing well and putting up points, and my hope is that he can continue to score and through to the end of the year so that he can return actual value in a trade.

By the same token I'd like to see Lander get some at-bats as a 2nd line C to see if he's capable of producing points while providing greater defensive accountability.

Lander to #2 C, while trading the pick and Gagner for a top pairing D - yes please!

Avatar
#6 ThatButthurtOilersFan
March 12 2014, 04:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
41
cheers

Well, this is that 2C chance for Lander everyone wanted to happen. Hope he does well.

Avatar
#7 Shredder
March 12 2014, 04:24PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers

I really hope Lander can develop into that 2 way centre that we've been hoping for since 2009. I truly believe he can be that guy, and ultimately replace Gagner. I'd rather have 2 2way wingers ala Gordon than 2 scoring forwards. As I said in the last post, goaltending is our strongest position, let's build from the net out as we should, which means 2way centres...Nuge can create offense along with his 2way play, and he's only 20. Perfect #1C, and I HOPE Lander can push it for 2nd line C.

Avatar
#8 pelhem grenville
March 12 2014, 04:33PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
33
cheers

memo to mact

draft a centre at the draft

Avatar
#9 Mikey
March 12 2014, 04:51PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
31
cheers

I really do hope that he gets to play with Hall and Perron. Even if for just one game.

Avatar
#10 Sevenseven
March 12 2014, 05:15PM
Trash it!
11
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers

I think if Gagner is good to go, play him. The oilers have more to gain by playing him on the top line and him performing well. His trade value should be much higher this summer than at the trade deadline. We can always look at Lander next camp, this is the last chance to showcase Gagner before his NMC kicks in. Good luck to both players, and please play well Gagner! You need a fresh start, and we need a differnt type of player.

Avatar
#11 vetinari
March 12 2014, 05:26PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
57
cheers

Every time that they recall Lander, I think of Lucy pulling the football away from Charlie Brown at the last minute...

Avatar
#12 Rama Lama
March 12 2014, 05:47PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
47
cheers

Playing Lander on the fourth line and expecting him to turn heads is simply stupid.

Unless this guy gets a chance to play with a little skill expect nothing!

Avatar
#13 Smokey
March 12 2014, 05:58PM
Trash it!
15
trashes
Cheers
25
cheers

Should be Arco

Avatar
#14 majin_oil
March 12 2014, 06:03PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers
pelhem grenville wrote:

memo to mact

draft a centre at the draft

Anymore wins and we just might be. Whats interesting, is Draisaitl is having a killer 2nd half to his season and has now has more points than Reinhart(granted 4 more games in hands but he's been narrowing the gaps for weeks regardless). If we can't get Ekblad it has to be Draisaitl!!

Avatar
#15 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
March 12 2014, 06:05PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

Might be a player in there after all.

Here's hoping...

Paul, thought you were a card carrying member of the Ekblad or bust club. Resistance is futile remember.

Avatar
#16 bwar
March 12 2014, 06:45PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

My guess is that this call up also pretty much guarantees that Arcobello won't be signing back on with the club this summer. I was really hoping that Gagner would be traded and that we would get to see both Lander and Arcobello getting a shot as the 2C to close out the season.

I think most people are over Gagner and feel its time to move on. I think we also want to know if we have a legit replacement in the system or if its an issue that need to be address via free agency/draft/trade.

Avatar
#17 New Season New Hope
March 12 2014, 06:53PM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Cheers
21
cheers

I see alot of posts to replace Gagner. However, if the Oilers trade him, they better get good value for him. I know his stats look quite bad on the year as a whole but if you break them down, its not nearly as bad as it seems overall. He has been returning to form recently.

First 7 games - 1 point and -10

Next 22 games - 12 points and -7

Last 24 games - 18 points and -2

Considering how bad the Oilers are, you don't want to trade a guy who can be on pace (based on his last 24 games) for 62 points in an 82 game schedule without getting good value. That is also about the pace he played at last year (38 pts in 48 games). If we keep trading actual NHL caliber players for spare parts (i.e. Horcoff for Larsen) and low draft picks (i.e. Hemsky), we will stay in the basement forever. Unless Lander can get similar points, we should not be getting rid of Gagner without getting either a top six forward or top 4 d-man. No combination of draft picks, bottom six forwards, or 5-6 d-men are going to be worth it. Especially if we see Gagner light it up on another team.

Avatar
#18 Dave
March 12 2014, 08:02PM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers

I have a theory that Gagner's parents took away his soother too soon hence his constant sucking on his mouth guard.

Avatar
#19 Bicepus Maximus - Huge fan boy!
March 12 2014, 08:09PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
26
cheers

@New Season New Hope

Gagner never seems to get there for a guy who's always "on pace".

Time to part ways.

Avatar
#20 Dog Train
March 12 2014, 08:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

If Gagner can't go then plug Lander right in the middle of that same line. For my money, Hall and Perron are our two best offensive players right now. If he can't create scoring chances with that line, he may never be able to do it at the NHL level. That said, if he only gets one game, then St. Louis certainly will be a tough task for him. If he is going to seize the day, he will need to come up with a big game.

Avatar
#21 **
March 12 2014, 08:43PM
Trash it!
25
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

~STOP THE PRESSES!!!! Lander has been recalled, AGAIN!!!!!~.

This article just found a new low on my give a $hito-meter.

Avatar
#22 G bear
March 12 2014, 09:07PM
Trash it!
46
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Taylor Gang wrote:

The second line spot is up for grabs.

Seize the moment Lander.

Lander= too SMALL! We have enough small players for the whole division on our team! Let's call up some size and Truculence- Pinnizotto? MacIntyre?

Avatar
#23 Dave
March 12 2014, 09:10PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
Dave wrote:

I have a theory that Gagner's parents took away his soother too soon hence his constant sucking on his mouth guard.

OK I am kidding but I do wonder if had a mouth guard that was somewhat fixed perhaps he would not have needed so much dental work when he got slugged by the high stick.

Avatar
#24 Mason Storm
March 12 2014, 09:17PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Dave wrote:

OK I am kidding but I do wonder if had a mouth guard that was somewhat fixed perhaps he would not have needed so much dental work when he got slugged by the high stick.

That high stick hit him so hard, I think if he had a full cage on it wouldn't have mattered

Avatar
#25 Oiler Al
March 12 2014, 09:19PM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

Lander is not the answer for Oilers Top 6. Maybe third line, but you have Gordon and Arcobello ahead of him for 3rd line duties.

Avatar
#26 nuge2nail
March 12 2014, 09:57PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers

Oiler Domination To Follow

Should have been Arcobello.

The best thing MacT can do is draft a center, preferably Bennett who is the grittiest.

Next step would be to sign Statsny or Legwand.

We would finally have enough depth up the Middle to compete in our Division.

Statsny - Hopkins - Bennett - Gordon - Lander

Than trade Gagner for a #3-#4 Dman.

Finally Dump A Truck Load(30+ Million to be exact) on UFA Defenseman this offseason - preferably on 2-3 year deals.

Avatar
#27 **
March 12 2014, 10:37PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
G bear wrote:

Lander= too SMALL! We have enough small players for the whole division on our team! Let's call up some size and Truculence- Pinnizotto? MacIntyre?

why are you usurping my former self?. There is only one G bear, I'm coming for you boy

Avatar
#28 Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)
March 12 2014, 10:37PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
majin_oil wrote:

Anymore wins and we just might be. Whats interesting, is Draisaitl is having a killer 2nd half to his season and has now has more points than Reinhart(granted 4 more games in hands but he's been narrowing the gaps for weeks regardless). If we can't get Ekblad it has to be Draisaitl!!

With our improved goaltending there's a pretty good chance well be drafting 5th or 6th ....if Ekblad, Reinhart, Bennett and Draisaitl are gone....who do you pick?......

Avatar
#29 bazmagoo
March 12 2014, 10:45PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

@Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)

Doubtful, only team I can see us passing is Florida. 940% save percentages don't last forever my friend.

Avatar
#30 **
March 12 2014, 10:49PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty) wrote:

With our improved goaltending there's a pretty good chance well be drafting 5th or 6th ....if Ekblad, Reinhart, Bennett and Draisaitl are gone....who do you pick?......

I would say if those guys are gone come the Oilers' turn, trade the pick. This year's draft class is relatively weak, I think the team can get better return trading the pick in a package than getting a so so prospect.

Avatar
#31 Rod from Viking
March 12 2014, 11:11PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers
Dog Train wrote:

If Gagner can't go then plug Lander right in the middle of that same line. For my money, Hall and Perron are our two best offensive players right now. If he can't create scoring chances with that line, he may never be able to do it at the NHL level. That said, if he only gets one game, then St. Louis certainly will be a tough task for him. If he is going to seize the day, he will need to come up with a big game.

It seems that everyone does better playing with Hall and Perron, I bet the Nuge would be doing far better if he was centering them as well, Eberle seems to be lost without Hall and Yak is playing so uninspired. If Gagner can't go I would hope Lander is centering one of the top two lines but the lineup decisions have been questionable more often than not this year.

Avatar
#32 RexHolez
March 12 2014, 11:15PM
Trash it!
17
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

Oilers recall Lander?! Awesome!! This will solve 8 years of a failed rebuild with the same incompetent management group in charge!

Avatar
#33 RexHolez
March 12 2014, 11:45PM
Trash it!
14
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

Let me guess.... This will be a chance to see what the oilers have and give management a chance to see what they need to improve upon in the offseason. At the same time it will give the young guys a taste of big game experience and allow them to recognize what aspects of their game they need to improve upon.... Heard this story 8 years running now....

Avatar
#34 RexHolez
March 13 2014, 12:00AM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Oh wait, I'm missing somthing. This will also give the team a chance to learn the "ups and downs" of what it takes to compete in this league and provide them with learning experiences that they can draw upon once their fighting for the stanley cup year after year like we've all been told is an inevitable outcome of this grand rebuild we're all so privelaged to be witnessing. Cuz if their's 1 guy who knows about winning, it's the guy in charge of this master piece!!

Avatar
#35 BLAKPOO
March 13 2014, 12:13AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
21
cheers
Oiler Al wrote:

Lander is not the answer for Oilers Top 6. Maybe third line, but you have Gordon and Arcobello ahead of him for 3rd line duties.

Arcobello is ahead of nobody for no jobs on the Oilers.

Look at the size of the teams in our conference, now look at the size of our top 9.

No chance they slide a smurf that can't score goals into the mix. Good guy, decent compete, heart-warming story, whatever. He's small and he doesn't score and he's done here. Let it go.

Lander, if he performs well, provides a stop-gap at 2C that would allow MacT to move Gagner for assets we actually need, namely defence. Lander's really going to have to impress if he hopes to figure into any kind of long term plan though.

Ultimately, I doubt Lander, Arco or Gagner are around for training camp next year. Say what you want about MacT, but one thing he is not is idle.

Avatar
#36 Andrew
March 13 2014, 01:32AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

Do I smell smoke? Is that MacTavish fiddling over there in the corner office while the 2014 season is burnng?

He needs to get the plug out of his a** and get Arco, Pitlick and Lander PLAYING. Are these decisions part of Eakins insanity? Ryan Smyth might be here next season but he shouldn't be. How is it that one of the aforementioned can't replace Ryan Jones, Smyth or Joensuu? These guys are not now nor will ever be part of the future.

Avatar
#37 27Ginge
March 13 2014, 02:52AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

I'd be pumped to see a guy with decent size and great defensive instincts get a crack at the 2 line C spot. Love gags but he just isn't right for this squad.

Avatar
#38 OilDieHard
March 13 2014, 05:58AM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers
BLAKPOO wrote:

Arcobello is ahead of nobody for no jobs on the Oilers.

Look at the size of the teams in our conference, now look at the size of our top 9.

No chance they slide a smurf that can't score goals into the mix. Good guy, decent compete, heart-warming story, whatever. He's small and he doesn't score and he's done here. Let it go.

Lander, if he performs well, provides a stop-gap at 2C that would allow MacT to move Gagner for assets we actually need, namely defence. Lander's really going to have to impress if he hopes to figure into any kind of long term plan though.

Ultimately, I doubt Lander, Arco or Gagner are around for training camp next year. Say what you want about MacT, but one thing he is not is idle.

true, Arco is the feel good story of the year, but he doesn't score goals and is too small to play on a top 6 that already isn't that big. Oilers should see if they can get a decent pick for him.

and i'm not convinced that Lander is the answer as a second line center, but if he plays, put him there and see if he can produce points like he now seems able to do in the AHL.

Avatar
#39 Spydyr
March 13 2014, 07:31AM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers
New Season New Hope wrote:

I see alot of posts to replace Gagner. However, if the Oilers trade him, they better get good value for him. I know his stats look quite bad on the year as a whole but if you break them down, its not nearly as bad as it seems overall. He has been returning to form recently.

First 7 games - 1 point and -10

Next 22 games - 12 points and -7

Last 24 games - 18 points and -2

Considering how bad the Oilers are, you don't want to trade a guy who can be on pace (based on his last 24 games) for 62 points in an 82 game schedule without getting good value. That is also about the pace he played at last year (38 pts in 48 games). If we keep trading actual NHL caliber players for spare parts (i.e. Horcoff for Larsen) and low draft picks (i.e. Hemsky), we will stay in the basement forever. Unless Lander can get similar points, we should not be getting rid of Gagner without getting either a top six forward or top 4 d-man. No combination of draft picks, bottom six forwards, or 5-6 d-men are going to be worth it. Especially if we see Gagner light it up on another team.

OK I will bite. Gagner once scored 8 points in one game. You don't want to trade a guy who can be on pace (based on his one game)for 672 points. See, cherry picking stats is crap.

Avatar
#40 Jacques Strap
March 13 2014, 07:43AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers
OilDieHard wrote:

true, Arco is the feel good story of the year, but he doesn't score goals and is too small to play on a top 6 that already isn't that big. Oilers should see if they can get a decent pick for him.

and i'm not convinced that Lander is the answer as a second line center, but if he plays, put him there and see if he can produce points like he now seems able to do in the AHL.

I believe Arco is a UFA at the end of the season. If that's a true statement we are going to get 5/8 of jack squat for him. Too bad for us but better for him. Realistically we would have been lucky to get a 5th for him anyhow.

Avatar
#41 OilDieHard
March 13 2014, 07:54AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

^yup, i found teams were being very stingy at the trade deadline with giving up players, prospects and especially draft choices. many teams likely will just wait until the summer if they are interested in Arco and sign him for free.

Avatar
#42 j
March 13 2014, 08:19AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

Hey JW - who makes the call as to whether a player is able to play? What are the criteria? In this case, it would make sense for the Oil to get Lander a game or two without burning a 'call-up' so they would rather Gagner be injured. I'm curious how easy this option can be manipulated by teams. On that note, I understand why the league doesn't want 15 call ups down the stretch as it affects the competition level and will impact those teams actually in the play-off hunt but there has to be a better system to allow some showcasing. Perhaps the rule should be a min number of one-way contracts on the big team but the others can be interchanged freely (i.e. no limit on actual amount of call ups - just on how many can play at once).

Avatar
#43 2015Playoffs?Nope!
March 13 2014, 08:30AM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
New Season New Hope wrote:

I see alot of posts to replace Gagner. However, if the Oilers trade him, they better get good value for him. I know his stats look quite bad on the year as a whole but if you break them down, its not nearly as bad as it seems overall. He has been returning to form recently.

First 7 games - 1 point and -10

Next 22 games - 12 points and -7

Last 24 games - 18 points and -2

Considering how bad the Oilers are, you don't want to trade a guy who can be on pace (based on his last 24 games) for 62 points in an 82 game schedule without getting good value. That is also about the pace he played at last year (38 pts in 48 games). If we keep trading actual NHL caliber players for spare parts (i.e. Horcoff for Larsen) and low draft picks (i.e. Hemsky), we will stay in the basement forever. Unless Lander can get similar points, we should not be getting rid of Gagner without getting either a top six forward or top 4 d-man. No combination of draft picks, bottom six forwards, or 5-6 d-men are going to be worth it. Especially if we see Gagner light it up on another team.

Now lets look at his true value. We will put his salary beside his stats:

First 7 games - 1 point and -10 - $410,000

Next 22 games - 12 points and -7 - $1,290,000

Last 24 games - 18 points and -2 - $1,405,000

His contract is terrible and his point production (even if it goes back up to ~40-45 points a year, is still not good value. Id rather pay $1,200,000 more and get a 70pt player in Hall.

How gagner makes more then Perron is just an example of how our management is clueless.

Dont expect a thing in return for Gagner except a bad contract, or another 5/6/7 dman or bottom line/depth forward.

And im very fine with that. I might be the minority, but im also realistic when it comes to Gagner, and i would have EASILY taken the Clifford for Gagner straight up from LA (but i refuse to belive this was ever actually offered).

Avatar
#44 New Season New Hope
March 13 2014, 08:44AM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers

@Bicepus Maximus - Huge fan boy!

Gagner was second last year in points on the team - ahead of Eberle in the same number of games. Neither Perron nor RNH had as many points this year at 48 games as Gagner did last year. So are they just the next ones that never seem to get there or are the expectations on Gagner too high. He makes way less than RNH will next year. A 50-60 point per year guy is a pretty good 2nd line center on most teams. There are teams in the playoffs that don't have 2nd line centers who get that many points per year.

I am not saying that we should keep him, we have too many players of similar size on the team, but we need to get appropriate value for him. Either we get a D-man that is equivalent to a 50-60 point per year forward or a bigger forward that is at a minimum a 45 to 50 point per year guy. Other than that, we are getting rid of an asset without adequate return.

Avatar
#45 New Season New Hope
March 13 2014, 08:56AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@Spydyr

Fine lets go with his last two seasons (which did not include the 8 point night). Thats 69 points in Gagner's last 101 games. That's a 56 point per 82 game pace including the 7 games after he came back from a broken jaw. Does that seem like cherry picking stats to you still. I am just asking that the return for Gagner in a trade is based on a young 50-60 point per year NHL player. Combinations of draft picks and 5-6 D-men don't cut it.

Avatar
#46 Randaman
March 13 2014, 09:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
New Season New Hope wrote:

Gagner was second last year in points on the team - ahead of Eberle in the same number of games. Neither Perron nor RNH had as many points this year at 48 games as Gagner did last year. So are they just the next ones that never seem to get there or are the expectations on Gagner too high. He makes way less than RNH will next year. A 50-60 point per year guy is a pretty good 2nd line center on most teams. There are teams in the playoffs that don't have 2nd line centers who get that many points per year.

I am not saying that we should keep him, we have too many players of similar size on the team, but we need to get appropriate value for him. Either we get a D-man that is equivalent to a 50-60 point per year forward or a bigger forward that is at a minimum a 45 to 50 point per year guy. Other than that, we are getting rid of an asset without adequate return.

Not gonna happen. Plain and simple. MacT will not get value for Gagner because everybody knows he is under the gun. There will have to be a package deal done to achieve value for Gagner.

Avatar
#47 TKB2677
March 13 2014, 09:15AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

I'm looking forward to the day when Gagner is traded and we can once and for all call him EX. OILER SAM GAGNER.

To me Gagner is the poster boy for what is wrong with the mix in the Oilers top 6 and what is wrong with the Oilers "core" of young players.

Problem #1: He's too small especially given the size of the more talented wingers.

Problem #2: He's completely 1 dimensional. That dimension is an inconsistent offensive player. That one dimension isn't elite, it's good but only when he is playing well. When he isn't playing well, his one dimension is completely invisible and he actually hurts your team. He probably only plays well half the year at best. Case in point. For a guy who's only dimension is offense, when you are playing in your 7th NHL season and your best goal total is 18 and your best point total is 49 pts, there's a problem.

Problem #3. He can't play defense what so ever and seems to be unwilling to learn how. When you are in your 7th NHL season, playing primarily offensive minutes, not getting difficult own zone starts, you can't be -19. I'm sorry, that's totally unacceptable. He's second worst on the team to a freaking 19 yr old. I know the Oilers defense sucks and their goaltending for more than half the year sucked and Gagner is still technically young but a 7 yr vet has to be better and has to better example for the younger players. Especially when you aren't used in tough defensive situations. How can you expect the other kids to buy in when their buddy and 7 yr vet Gagner doesn't.

Problem #4: He still sucks at faceoffs. He's 7 yrs in and he's this season 45.9%. Now that's a little better than last year but that's not saying much given he was 43.9 last year. It's has to be better especially 7 yrs in. It again comes back to the dimension thing. If your one dimension that you bring isn't elite, then you have to do something else or LEARN how to do something else.

Problem #5: Gagner makes to much money for what he brings to the team. Part of the problem for the Oilers is Gagner's age. If Gagner was in his 30's then you know exactly what you have with him and he probably makes a little less given his production and the holes in his game. But Gagner is still technically young so the Oilers had to pay him a little more for the "potential" that he will get better. I think on the Oilers, Gagner is about as good as he is going to get. ON the Oilers in a "good year" he will top out at high teens in goals and 50ish points, being a high negative +/- and a 45% faceoff guy. On a different team with a different mix of players, he might add to those totals getting over 20 goals and 60ish pts but he will NEVER do it on the Oilers. On the Oilers, based on what he brings and his production. He makes about 1 mill per year too much. He's making 4.8 this season.

Good example. Grabovski took a while to sign. Signed a 1 yr with the Caps. Grabovski is a 30yr old center. He's 5'11, 185lbs. He has 12 goals, 33 pts, +4 and is 54.1% on the dot. He makes 3 mill. When his contract is up, I doubt he gets a almost 1.8 mill raise per year to match Gagner's contract. You telling me that Gagner is worth 1.8 mill more than Grabovski? HOW?

Avatar
#48 Old Retired Guy (A.K.A. Die-Nasty)
March 13 2014, 09:15AM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

Enough of the talk about the Oilers "Kids" needing more time to mature. or our rebuild being on track.

The Colorado Avalanche Young stars are 18, 21, 23, 23 and 25.

The Avalanche rebuild started in 2009. Twenty Two players on the roster were added on or after 2009.

They do not have ANY Norris Trophy or Vezina Trophy candidates.They do not have a coach with NHL experience.

Matt Duchene C 23 2009, Erik Johnson D 25 2011, Gabriel Landeskog 21 2011, Nathan MacKinnon 18 2013, Ryan O'Reilly 23 2009

The Oilers drafted wrong, recruited wrong, are coached wrong, are managed wrong......what other explanation could there be that Colorado has become an Elite Team in second place in the Western Conference standings while the Oilers are dead last and playing like a perenial lottery pick team?

Avatar
#49 TigerUnderGlass
March 13 2014, 09:15AM
Trash it!
7
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
Spydyr wrote:

OK I will bite. Gagner once scored 8 points in one game. You don't want to trade a guy who can be on pace (based on his one game)for 672 points. See, cherry picking stats is crap.

You don't think it's fair to point out that he played pretty well last season and since returning from his injury this season has been gradually returning to that form?

A response like yours actually makes his position look better because it suggests you have no reasonable counter point.

Avatar
#50 TigerUnderGlass
March 13 2014, 09:25AM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
2015Playoffs?Nope! wrote:

Now lets look at his true value. We will put his salary beside his stats:

First 7 games - 1 point and -10 - $410,000

Next 22 games - 12 points and -7 - $1,290,000

Last 24 games - 18 points and -2 - $1,405,000

His contract is terrible and his point production (even if it goes back up to ~40-45 points a year, is still not good value. Id rather pay $1,200,000 more and get a 70pt player in Hall.

How gagner makes more then Perron is just an example of how our management is clueless.

Dont expect a thing in return for Gagner except a bad contract, or another 5/6/7 dman or bottom line/depth forward.

And im very fine with that. I might be the minority, but im also realistic when it comes to Gagner, and i would have EASILY taken the Clifford for Gagner straight up from LA (but i refuse to belive this was ever actually offered).

I love it when people seriously suggest that the team should have made a trade that could potentially have gone down as one of the worst in history.

Lets trade a real player for a guy with no room for improvement and has no value outside of GRRRRR.

Comments are closed for this article.