Can the Edmonton Oilers afford to trade Sam Gagner? Can they afford not to?

Jonathan Willis
March 18 2014 10:13AM

89-Gagner-6

There is no more controversial player in Edmonton than Sam Gagner. The payoff for the difficult 2006-07 season, the still-young forward was supposed to be a primary piece for the Oilers to build around at centre. Instead, nearly 500 games into his NHL career, he continues to struggle.

What should Edmonton do with him?

The Case for Moving

89-Gagner-4

The argument for moving Gagner is that he isn’t a two-way hockey player.

Scoring isn’t really Gagner’s problem. He hasn’t lit the world on fire but he’s been posting very respectable second-line point totals since day one. On a team with Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, that’s good enough (or should be eventually), even if it isn’t what the Oilers had in mind when they picked him sixth overall.

Gagner isn’t big, but that isn’t really a primary problem either. History is full of teams that have won Stanley Cups with centres roughly the size of Nugent-Hopkins and Gagner (fun fact for the ‘every team needs size down the middle!’ people: of the 10 centres to play on the Cup winners from Detroit (2008) and Boston (2011), not even one of them was listed at over 200 pounds). There are plenty of ways to win hockey games, and having a bunch of 6’4” guys who can play pivot is one of them, but not the only one.

What every Stanley Cup winner has in common is good players. And while Gagner is certainly an NHL player, it’s fair to wonder if he’s really the guy a team wants in the No. 2 pivot slot. Chicago won with Martin Hanzal (edit: Michal Handzus) there last season, but very few teams can insulate their No. 2 centre with Jonathan Toews in the No. 1 role and people like Patrick Kane and Patrick Sharp and Marian Hossa on the wings.

Watch Gagner on this goal against from Edmonton’s last game in Carolina:

Justin Schultz grabs the puck at the blue line and jumps up ice. Gagner’s in the middle of the zone, behind the pinching Schultz and his two wingers, and sees it all happen. At about the two second mark, he’s at the far left of the screen about halfway up, watching a battle on the side boards. There’s a Carolina player just above and to the right of him. A good centre knows that, knows that Schultz (smartly) pinched, and covers for the defenceman. Gagner wanders past the Hurricanes forward and suddenly there’s a two-on-one, and eventually a goal against.

Every player makes mistakes, and thus any player can be made to look terrible on video. But from what I’ve seen, this is a mistake typical of Gagner. He doesn’t have the defensive commitment a centre needs. He cheats for offence.

The Case Against Moving

89-Gagner-7

The argument against moving Gagner is equally simple. It’s a stupid idea from an asset management perspective to trade players during low ebbs in value.

The following are Gagner’s totals (projected over 82 games) for the last five seasons:

Season  G A PTS +/-
2009-10 18 31 49 -10
2010-11 18 33 51 -21
2011-12 20 31 51 5
2012-13 24 41 65 -10
2013-14 10  36 46 -31

Gagner is at a low ebb in goal-scoring, a low ebb in point-scoring and a particularly low ebb in plus/minus. I think that in this case the basic statistics reflect reality. He started the year injured, he came back and was brutal, and while he’s improved a little bit lately he simply hasn’t been the Gagner of past seasons.

If the Oilers had traded Gagner two years ago, they likely would have had a better return. Ditto for last season. This year? We’re talking about the Oilers retaining salary and getting back Kyle Clifford.

Bad NHL teams typically bleed talent. One of the reasons is because bad teams generally have managers who make bad decisions, but there’s more to it than that. Bad teams are under more pressure than good teams to move players in off years, because they need everyone performing at a top level just to get within visual range of respectability. Bad teams tend not to have a support system, so when the bottom falls out on a player it really falls out.

Moving Gagner right now will see the Oilers get a 50 cents on the dollar return.

What Should Edmonton Do?

Craig MacTavish10

We are in a situation where the team has competing interests. It needs to get better in the No. 2 centre slot, which means trading Gagner away. But it also needs to get full value (or as close to it as possible) to improve the roster, which means retaining Gagner.

There are all kinds of real world problems here (is Gagner pushing for a trade, which free agents will consider Edmonton, what does the trade market look like) but in theory I think there’s an obvious two-step best course here:

  • 1. Add a replacement for Gagner to the roster.
  • 2. Keep Gagner until his trade value rebounds.

Let’s call Gagner’s replacement “Brandon Dubinsky” (we’re picking on Columbus here because they have Ryan Johansen and Boone Jenner and Artem Anisimov and because virtually any of their four good centres would be a nice fit for the Oilers – but the general idea is just to add a player-type, not a specific player). If the Oilers add “Dubinsky” in the off-season without off-loading Gagner, they could start next year by putting him at centre on the third line and bumping Boyd Gordon down into the role of fourth-line defensive specialist (it’s the role Manny Malhotra played in Vancouver).

That puts Nugent-Hopkins’ line in the power-vs.-power role, the “Dubinsky” line in a secondary tough minutes role, the Gordon line in a defensive zone role, and leaves all kinds of soft minutes for the Gagner line. In that situation, it’s pretty conceivable that Gagner recovers offensively and his trade value increases dramatically, at which point Edmonton’s free to deal him for something else and bump “Dubinsky” into a more offensive role.

As we said, there are real-world considerations that might make this scenario an impossibility. But if possible, I think it’s the best route forward for Edmonton.

RECENTLY BY JONATHAN WILLIS

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#151 dman
March 18 2014, 12:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
They're $hittie wrote:

So you base how you rate players based on size? Thats good to know.

As for Hockey DB that site lists the weight of the player at his first year pro. Gagner confirmed his weight of 201 on the radio.

As for Draisatl Im not calling him a bust, I have a bad feeling about him. Again this is another player being called lazy and uncommited. Sounds a lot like Grigorenko. As for putting up points. Good for him. Still no where near what Gagner did in 2006, and he did not turn out as planned.

To pikc LD over better players Reinhart and Bennett because his is taller is the stupidiest thing we could do.

Calling him a bust is exactly what you did. See comment #15

Avatar
#152 **
March 18 2014, 12:54PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Tikkanese wrote:

Same could be said for the sell low buy high strategy that has been going on for longer than the what if strategy in Edmonton.

Please elaborate.

Avatar
#153 BaconWrapped
March 18 2014, 01:38PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
** wrote:

I hope you weren't trolling because I just felt respected. *leans back on his chair and nods approvingly*

You sir, just earned a prop. And I never prop.

Avatar
#154 **
March 18 2014, 01:42PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
BaconWrapped wrote:

You sir, just earned a prop. And I never prop.

Much obliged, oh deliciously named stranger.

Avatar
#155 oilerjed
March 18 2014, 01:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
** wrote:

Well there is talk of Bogdan Yakimov coming over this summer. He's Yakupov's homie, plays center, is a massive human being at 6'5, 210 pounds and did some scoring on depth minutes in the KHL this season (7 goals and 12 points in 33 games). It would be interesting to see him at training camp.

On a side note, keeping with JW's awful recommendations, he suggested to trade for David Clarkson back in December:

http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/2013/12/14/should-the-edmonton-oilers-trade-for-toronto-maple-leafs-forward-david-clarkson/

These are Clarkson's numbers so far: 47 games, 4 goals, 6 assists, 10 points, plus/minus -7, $5,250,000 cap hit until 2020.

So, there's that.

Thanks for that. My next question was about Yakimov. How ready is he?

Avatar
#156 **
March 18 2014, 03:01PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Tikkanese wrote:

When you reply to the article titled "Can the Edmonton Oilers afford to trade Sam Gagner? Can they afford not to?", then yes you are saying Yakimov is the answer.

Also name calling will not help your cause.

That is your interpretation, and I don't appreciate it when someone puts words in my mouth (or my fingers, for some overly grammar junkies).

Avatar
#157 Maggie the Monkey
March 18 2014, 03:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
** wrote:

I never liked Clarkson, and I am the one you're replying to. And you giving credence to the people running a team 8 years out of the playoffs, hmmm.... I know you can make a better argument than that. I can assure you Mac. T. is praying hail marys every night thanking the heavens Clarkson didn't sign here. Pretty much what you are predicting for Hendricks is what is happening to Clarkson right now. IF you are talking about khabibulin then I'm confused as to what your point is.

I'm going to release my inner "Steve Smith":

I don't think giving credence means what you think it means.

Avatar
#158 TigerUnderGlass
March 18 2014, 04:16PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

For the anti-Yakupov brigade:

https://twitter.com/mc79hockey/status/446045332246261760/photo/1

Avatar
#159 Oiler Al
March 18 2014, 04:42PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
** wrote:

"I haven't made any arguments", Couldn't have said it better myself. Logical arguments anyways.

Linus taught you were going to bed, didnt mama tuck you in with you cookies, glass of milk and a bed time story,

Avatar
#160 Maggie the Monkey
March 18 2014, 04:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
** wrote:

Nice try, points for originality, sadly, in the words of Inigo Montoya:

"I don't think it means what you think it means"

Here:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/credence

"b : credibility 1 "

My work here is done. Another bites the dust. I like this game.

My previous comment was perhaps a bit too obscure. Although I love The Princess Bride, it was not the reference to which I was pointing. "Steve Smith" is a treasured yet infrequent commenter on LT's site who stopped posting here ages ago. (I think he lost one of those poisoned drink challenges where his opponent had built up immunity.)

The reference to him and one of his jokes was not meant as an insult, and if you must consider it as a challenge, then this is my formal letter accepting defeat.

Your happy monkey,

Maggie

Avatar
#161 Tikkanese
March 19 2014, 11:45AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
TKB2677 wrote:

I live in Red Deer and watched the Rebels - Raiders play in game so I got to watch Draisaitl in person. Wow that kid is big. He's listed at 6'1, 208lbs. He's every bit of that and more. When he took the puck to the net, he took it to the net, there was no stopping him. When he wanted to shield the puck, he did it with no trouble.

I got into a debate with someone yesterday in here about Gagner not being that small and apparently he's 202lbs. I'd like to see Gagner and this kid stand side by side. Apparently Gagner is only 6lbs lighter than Draisaitl. Apparently 6lbs must make a gigantic difference because he would tower over Gagner both in height and width. Granted this is junior but there is no chance in hell Gagner can take the puck to the net like this kid will be able to do or shield guys off the puck like this kid can do with his size.

Maybe the bulk of Gagner's weight is in his legs. Bure & Forsberg were all like that.

Avatar
#162 TKB2677
March 19 2014, 04:00PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

@Tikkanese

Gagner must have one hell of a big set of legs and ass because even if you look at the first picture for this article - Gagner lined up vs Toews. According to the numbers Gagner weighs 202, Toews is 208. You telling me Gagner is only 6 lbs lighter than Toews? Look at how much wider Toews back looks compared to Gagner. 6lbs difference doesn't do that. 15 lbs difference does.

I could easily be wrong and Gagner is 202 but where he puts it I have no clue. That picture doesn't lie.

Comments are closed for this article.