Shopping for an Assistant Coach for the Edmonton Oilers

Jonathan Willis
April 23 2014 12:28PM

Dallas Eakins 11

There has been a lot of discussion this summer about Dallas Eakins’ assistant coaches. Partially, that’s because coaching seems clearly to have been an issue this year, and the revolving door in Edmonton means Eakins himself isn’t likely to go. Partially it’s because his current assistants fit the ‘old boys’ bill a little too well and have had suspicious longevity in an organization that fires almost everyone else.

Moving beyond the current staff, what qualities would we expect to see in a new Eakins assistant?

Defence

85-Marincin-5

The head coach typically runs the forward lines in-game, while his top assistant is responsible for sending out the defence pairings. So if we were picking a new top assistant for Eakins, ideally it would be someone who has some familiarity with defencemen.

An ability to develop defencemen is particularly important for the Oilers because they will be relying on a lot of young ones. Looking at the current defensive depth chart, the four most important people on it are probably Justin Schultz, Jeff Petry, Martin Marincin and Oscar Klefbom – that’s an awful lot of young talent that needs to grow in a hurry, and with others (Darnell Nurse, Dillon Simpson, Martin Gernat, perhaps even Aaron Ekblad) on the way the Oilers’ ability to develop defencemen may very well dictate the success or failure of the rebuild.

Power Play

The future up front

Dallas Eakins is not a good power play coach. The Oilers’ power play this year struggled, and this isn’t a new thing; when we considered the coach last summer one of the concerns was the impotent man advantage of the Toronto Marlies:

Special teams have been a wash – mostly because Eakins has coached a brilliantly successful penalty kill and a stubbornly impotent power play. Twice he’s coached the best penalty kill in the AHL; three times he’s coached a bottom-five power play. Additionally, his penalty killers tend to score goals while his power play units tend to be scored on.

Eakins’ history suggests that the Oilers would be well-served if he got some help running the man advantage.

Experience

Buchberger, Kelly

Eakins’ assistants in 2013-14 have a combined total of (1) years of head coaching experience – Kelly Buchberger’s middling season at the helm of the Springfield Falcons. Keith Acton’s been through the wars (he was an assistant coach alongside Craig MacTavish and Charlie Huddy on the 1998-99 New York Rangers, and he’d already been in the coaching game for half a decade at that point), but he’s never been the guy making the final calls.

Buchberger got one year in the AHL and has spent the last six as an assistant coach in Edmonton. Steve Smith got a year as an assistant to Brian Sutter in Calgary; otherwise his resume of pro coaching experience includes the last four seasons in Edmonton.

Ideally, a new assistant would bring experience as a head coach and a more varied history to the staff.

The Obvious Choice

Todd Nelson

Well, duh.

Todd Nelson had a pretty decent journeyman’s career as a defenceman during his time as a player. He has history with pretty much all of the key young prospect blueliners the Oilers desperately need to develop over the next few years; he helped Schultz, Petry, Marincin and Klefbom adapt to the professional game, excel in the AHL and ultimately graduate to the majors. Not only has he had success in general in developing defensive prospects; he’s had success with these defensive prospects.

Nelson’s Barons have had a better than 20 percent success rate on the power play in each of the last two seasons. Last year they led the AHL with a 21.6 success rate; in 2013-14 the team improved to 22.1 percent but fell to third in the league – and they managed it without any proven high-end AHL scoring forwards.

Nelson has been Oklahoma’s head coach for four seasons, four seasons in which his team made the playoffs every time after years and years of failure for the Oilers’ AHL affiliate. As an assistant to John Anderson before that, Nelson won an AHL championship with the Chicago Wolves and eventually spent two years in the same role in the NHL. Before that, he was an assistant coach on Detroit’s AHL affiliate and went on to win two championships in the UHL, a team that had a working relationship with that same Red Wings AHL affiliate.

So the first question is: How often does a team have an internal candidate who checks off the needed boxes so perfectly? The second is: How often does a team pass on an internal candidate who seems such an obvious fit?

RECENTLY BY JONATHAN WILLIS

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#1 ThatGuy109
April 23 2014, 12:37PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
97
cheers

Key question is: does Todd Nelson want to be an assistant coach, especially for a team that passed on him a year ago for Dallas Eakins?

I'd love to have him coach here and think he's the right guy for the job but I'm fearful he'll bolt for bigger opportunities elsewhere

Avatar
#2 Spydyr
April 23 2014, 12:38PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
38
cheers

No doubt Todd Nelson would be a good fit but who replaces him.He has done a very good job getting the kids ready for Edmonton.

Avatar
#3 jonny94
April 23 2014, 12:41PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
40
cheers

I really hope Todd Nelson gets promoted to the Edmonton Oilers.... Obvious to the Nation... Oblivious to Management.

Avatar
#4 freelancer
April 23 2014, 12:49PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
32
cheers

How much longer of a contract does he have with the Barons. It seems obvious that Nelson wants an NHL head coaching position. My question is does he think he can get that without having NHL coaching experience. Hopefully we see him behind the bench this year. Seems an obvious choice.

So obviously it won't happen.

Avatar
#5 hankthetank
April 23 2014, 12:50PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
30
cheers
ThatGuy109 wrote:

Key question is: does Todd Nelson want to be an assistant coach, especially for a team that passed on him a year ago for Dallas Eakins?

I'd love to have him coach here and think he's the right guy for the job but I'm fearful he'll bolt for bigger opportunities elsewhere

This all day. You get pigeon holed into a job you do so well that your manager refuses to let you advance. So what do you do? Find greener pastures.

Avatar
#6 K_Mart
April 23 2014, 12:50PM
Trash it!
29
trashes
Cheers
15
cheers

Todd Nelson would likely turn down that job. He is looking to be a head coach, not an assistant. It would be an insult to him if we offered him a job as an assistant.

Avatar
#7 Muji
April 23 2014, 12:53PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
70
cheers

Disagree.

Todd Nelson never played for the Edmonton Oilers. He's never won a Stanley Cup (i.e. doesn't know a thing or two about winning). And he doesn't have a familiar nickname like "Bucky". Pass.

Avatar
#8 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
April 23 2014, 12:54PM
Trash it!
30
trashes
Cheers
32
cheers

Stay the course.

Outside of adding 15' of rope to that equasion. The staus quo is fine. Dallas running the ship show for the full season is our best shot at Connor McDavid.

Avatar
#9 Sevenseven
April 23 2014, 12:54PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
33
cheers

Nelson should be head coach. Duh!

Avatar
#10 Fresh Mess
April 23 2014, 12:58PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
19
cheers

I don't believe Nelson is interested in that job. He will attract more NHL interest as a head coach of a successful AHL program, than he will being an assistant on a perennial loser in the NHL.

Avatar
#11 bazmagoo
April 23 2014, 01:07PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

Trade Bucky for Nelson! Bucky needs to be replaced, preferably with a PP specialist.

Avatar
#12 Spydyr
April 23 2014, 01:08PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
37
cheers
Sevenseven wrote:

Nelson should be head coach. Duh!

Trotz should be the head coach but the Oilers would never hire him.He was this thing called experience that they just don't like for some reason.

Avatar
#13 bazmagoo
April 23 2014, 01:08PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

@Fresh Mess

I think I'd be hesitant to call Nelson's AHL tenure a "successful program". I'd be inclined to think he'll have to spend a few years as an NHL assistant before being offered a head coaching role.

Avatar
#14 Will
April 23 2014, 01:10PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

I don't think Todd Nelson would look at the promotion as an insult. He's been a great asset for the Oilers, and bringing him up would send a good message. Moreover, I bet Eakins would shape us well as that would be like having a 1A and 1B coaching tandem.

Finally, can anyone tell me how these two assistant coaches were under Renny and Krueger, can't help Eakins run a power play. Under Renny and Krueger our PP got way better, even our PK under Kreuger was average.

Now they can't seem to say, well that worked, lets go back to that?

Avatar
#15 NJ
April 23 2014, 01:15PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

Seriously? Let's bring in ANOTHER AHL coach? Really? *facepalm* We do NOT need another coach up in the NHL who has to "adjust" to the NHL speed, systems etc... blah blah blah. We don't need another 82 game learning curve. We need an absolute proven NHL coach in here to do the assisant's job. Key word. NHL. I don't give a rip if that's Trotz or Laviolette... or someone.

Todd Nelson is doing a great job in OKC. Leave the guy there and give him a big @$$ raise. Keep the D men developing well and rising in value.

Solution? I'm not sure. Trotz (Nashville)was fired this year and he ran a better PP than the Oilers this year with I would say worse forwards but better d-men. He also knows how to run a solid defense and how to help guys continue their development.

Maybe a Peter Laviolette. I don't know either coach well and I understand Laviolette ran a crappy camp for Philly last year, however bringing in the right assistant coach this time, someone with deep NHL experience and a proven special teams guy is a big deal.

I don't know how long Jacques Martin's contract in Pittsburgh is, but there's a guy that might like another shot at head coach and he would know his chances are better getting one (and losing it) in Edmonton than taking over for Bylsma so maybe we could get a guy like that...

I'm not saying either IS the answer, but I'd suggest either is better than promoting another rookie into our locker room.

Avatar
#16 Vinotintazo
April 23 2014, 01:18PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

anyone have a link to watch okc play tonight?

Avatar
#17 Bubba
April 23 2014, 01:18PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers

Nelson should be moved up ASAP. Not just because he would make an awesome assistant, but to have him ready just in case, for the top job.

Avatar
#18 1979
April 23 2014, 01:18PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

Does anybody have Eakins and Mac-T's email address so we can send them the link to this article??

Avatar
#19 2004Z06
April 23 2014, 01:19PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
18
cheers

Please bring back Charlie Huddy as well.

Avatar
#21 vetinari
April 23 2014, 01:27PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

Nelson would be perfect. And it makes sense. Therefore, we won't do it. We zig when others zag... and it has always* worked out for us.

*"always" is defined as "never"

Frankly, it would be perfect to line up Eakins' competent successor, er, I mean, able assistant, for 2014/15.

Avatar
#22 S cottV
April 23 2014, 01:29PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Synergy and cohesiveness is extremely important between the Head Coach and Assistants.

There also has to be a high level of trust, to the point where the Head Coach allows himself to be challenged by his Assistants at the right times and in the right places.

Buchberger and Smith are too connected to the old boys establishment, to be ideal compliments for Eakins. If there were a smooth way for Eakins to replace them, he would probably go for it.

Can't see Eakins agreeing to work with Todd Nelson re trust issues.

At this point, he isn't dealing from a position of strength, so - will likely do whatever MacT wants.

This makes Eakins a bit of a lame duck and hard to believe that a lame duck can effectively lead the team where it needs to go.

The best of the best would have a difficult time leading the Oilers to the playoffs within 2 years.

Eakins is at best - the worst of the best.

Avatar
#23 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
April 23 2014, 01:36PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Hmmm.....bringing Nelly in, the guy you said no to so you could bring in Dallas Eakins.

Kinda like that compounding stress of having Eakins replacement standing right next to him on the bench next season.

Fragg his arse.

Avatar
#24 DAVE
April 23 2014, 01:40PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers
Spydyr wrote:

No doubt Todd Nelson would be a good fit but who replaces him.He has done a very good job getting the kids ready for Edmonton.

Kelly Buchberger @ S.Smith, Just get Nelson in Edmonton, so he take over when Eakin's get's fired.

Avatar
#25 NewfoundlandOil
April 23 2014, 01:44PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

It wouldn't surprise me if Nelson accepted that type of offer. It's not everyday an NHL coaching job (be it head coach or assistant) gets sent your way.

This potential move might also be signaled by the promotion of Bill Scott. You have to think that he would be pulling to have Nelson move up. Nelson gets a lot of positive comments from MacTavish. Bill Scott's promotion also shows that MacT is prepared to move new people in to senior positions and promote from within. Isn't this one of the main benefits of having the ownership structure that they have built since Katz bought the team.

Nelson to Edmonton Laxdall to OKC

Everybody moves up: players, coaches and management.

Avatar
#26 Wildcard
April 23 2014, 01:45PM
Trash it!
17
trashes
Cheers
24
cheers
Next up, is Connor McJesus. wrote:

Stay the course.

Outside of adding 15' of rope to that equasion. The staus quo is fine. Dallas running the ship show for the full season is our best shot at Connor McDavid.

Already planning for McDavid?

Ladies and Gentlemen, this is what's wrong with the fanbase. A loser mentality that supports tanking year in year out.

Avatar
#27 Spydyr
April 23 2014, 01:49PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers
DAVE wrote:

Kelly Buchberger @ S.Smith, Just get Nelson in Edmonton, so he take over when Eakin's get's fired.

Do you really think Katz is going to send his buddies to OKC?

Avatar
#28 15w40
April 23 2014, 01:59PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

I think the opportunity to bring in Nelson was last year instead of Eakins.

Can't see him wanting to come in under Eakins - he made it no secret how dissapointed he was about being passed over for another AHL coach to take the helm of his parent club (translation - kick to the groin).

If/when Eakins is determined to be a failure the organization can't go back to the same well and bring in another 1st timer from the minors - even if it is the right decision because of the failure the 1st time around. That and the GM has said that the coach decides who to bring in to help and is it likely that he brings in somebody that might make him look like he's not the smartest guy in the room? Uh - No.

I think Nelson will end up in another organization and depending on how much noise OKC makes in the playoffs this year - it could be a soon as this fall.

The fact that he got that team into the post season at all with the 9 goaltenders and the complete turnstile of players coming and going is a feat unto itself.

Too bad really somebody in house that could walk away and be a valuable asset somewhere else with no return.

Hmmm - haven't seen that one before......

Avatar
#29 Next up, is Connor McJesus.
April 23 2014, 02:00PM
Trash it!
16
trashes
Cheers
14
cheers

@Wildcard

You actually believe whats happened here the last five years isn't part of a gameplan? Incompetence of this magnitude isn't an accident.

You may return to watching your Teletubbies program now Wildcard.

Avatar
#30 Old Timer
April 23 2014, 02:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

If the Oilers decide to change assistants, and that is a big if, Eakins should be allowed to pick his own assistants with no meddling from MacT or Six rings.

I think Eakins should offer Nelson a coaches position but as some on here have stated, he probably won't and that would be yet another nail in Eakins coffin.

Whatever happens, I doubt that Nelson will want to be the coach in OKC after this year. He has way too much experience not to be considered for a coaching position somewhere in the NHL.

Avatar
#31 Pouzar99
April 23 2014, 02:06PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

Not only is Nelson a perfect fit for an assistant coaching position with the Oilers, working with the D men and running the PP, but surely other NHL teams must be aware of his skills. He has served his AHL apprenticeship and is ready for an NHL job, initially as an assistant coach, and likely ultimately as head man, here or somewhere else if the Oilers don't promote him. He was openly disappointed to being passed over for Eakins, a rather unfortunate decision, and an indication he feels he has earned a better job.

My fear is that old boys club loyalty to Steve Smith and Eakins' possible resistance to having an assistant who could be a threat to his position will block such a move. Yes, Eakins, as head coach should choose his own assistants, but MacT should press the case for Nelson to him. At this point, the appointment of Eakins appears a very serious mistake, which will not be remedied in the short term, largely because of the massive and disruptive turnover at his position in recent years. The addition of Nelson would have the double advantage of providing superior coaching in crucial areas and grooming a gifted gifted coach for future success within an organization desperately short of such skills. The right decision is obvious, but given recent history is unlikely to be made.

Avatar
#32 Oiler Al
April 23 2014, 02:18PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers

So if Eakins is managing the forward lines and Acton is doing the same for the defense men, what are SMith and Bucky doing on the bench?

Would they not have a better view of the flow of the game etc, from the press box.? I say this because I dont see a lot of communication between them and the players during the game. Smith a bit, Bucky stands there like a cow chewing his cud.

Avatar
#33 Aitch
April 23 2014, 02:20PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Christmas 1991 I got my first ever Oilers jersey. It didn't come with a name and after the mass star exodus that was well underway, I left it blank. I did briefly consider Buchburger because I theorized he would be the last of the old school to leave/be traded.

Perhaps I should get his name on a sport coat instead.

Avatar
#34 David S
April 23 2014, 02:48PM
Trash it!
12
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

So you're advocating an inexperienced NHL coach AND a no-NHL experience assistant?

If anything Eakins needs a top notch NHL savvy assistant to make up for his *ahem* lack of tactical awareness at the NHL level.

I can see it now.

Eakins (on the bench - looks over at Nelson) - "Doesn't look good Todd, got any ideas?"

Nelson - "Gee Dallas, YOU'RE the head coach. Wanna get some slurpees after the game?" *does best deer in headlights impression, begins drooling*

Eakins - "WE'RE SCREWED NOW BOYS!" *Starts doing (now famous) Velociraptor impression on bench*

Avatar
#35 Grumpy McOilfan
April 23 2014, 02:54PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

Wait a sec... If they got rid of Smith and Bucky who would teach them the correct way to lean against the glass with their hands in their pockets and disinterestedly stare off into the distance while chewing gum not unlike a cow chews their cud ALL GAME LONG...? #ProTips #Poise

Avatar
#36 Racki
April 23 2014, 02:59PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

This is just one man. In my opinion, all of Acton, Smith and Buchy have shown nothing to keep them around any longer. Nelson sounds good to me for one of the 3 replacements.. Who are the next two? Would Rocky Thompson be a good candidate for promotion as well? More familiarity.

What about the other usual suspect.. Mr. Laxdal..?

Avatar
#37 OilDieHard
April 23 2014, 03:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers

hiring Todd Nelson makes too much sense....therefore the Oilers won't do it....at least at the expense of lifelong assistants Bucky and Smith....

Avatar
#38 BobbyO
April 23 2014, 03:10PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

I think the Oilers should stay with there current strategy and hire a former Oiler. It seems to work !

Avatar
#39 Micbilly
April 23 2014, 03:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
4
cheers

If the Oilers truly want to improve, they must take a long look at the players and the coaching staff. The players did not perform to the best of their abilities and the coaching staff did not perform well. If you look at the Oilers defense over the last few years, they have not developed a defenseman. Gilbert/Petry have not grown (Gilbert is gone). Development cannot be totally blamed on the player. The assistant coach needs to take some of that responsibility. The Oilers need to find an assistant coach that can develop young defenseman or they will be in the same position for years.

And who was the last goalie that the Oilers developed or at the least improved with the Oilers? Ah....no one. Whoever has been coaching these goalies has got to go. Find someone else because they are not getting it done.

Avatar
#40 nunyour
April 23 2014, 03:25PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

Why would you bring in someone with no nhl experience,we already have lots of that.

Avatar
#41 LOIL99
April 23 2014, 03:29PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

With the success Nelson is having coupled with the Oilers management's ineptitude, I fully expect he will be, on short order, beating that pants off of the Oilers as a coach of a rival NHL franchise.

Avatar
#42 westcoastoil
April 23 2014, 03:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers

more and more teams have assistants that were head coaches, so there's no reason for Nelson to have his nose out of joint to become an assistant. Since Eakins is staying, I'd be trilled to see him joined by Nelson and some combo of Ramsay and/or Dineen (assuming Eakins would want to keep Acton which seems obvious).

With what teams pay players, having marginally extra dough on your bench in coaches is pennies particularly if it can get your club closer to the payoffs where it's all gravy for the owner.

Avatar
#43 godot10
April 23 2014, 03:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers

So after being passed over for the head coaching job without so much as a courtesy call/interview last summer, Todd Nelson is supposed to accept a demotion to assistant NHL from head coach of an AHL team?

I presume that Todd Nelson wants to be an NHL head coach. He has already done the NHL assistant coach apprenticeship under John Anderson. The best way to be an NHL head coach is to be an AHL head coach.

If Nelson were to take a step back in his career to an NHL assistant, Edmonton would NOT be the place to do it, because if Eakins fails, MacT will have to hire an experienced NHL coach.

I expect that Nelson will leave the organization for the above reason. He is blocked from being head coach in Edmonton, even if Eakins fails, so he will look for a head coaching job in the NHL or AHL in another organization.

I'm hoping Trotz puts him on David Poile's radar. He would be a great fit for the Nashville NHL head coaching job.

Avatar
#44 Czar
April 23 2014, 04:19PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
5
cheers
nunyour wrote:

Why would you bring in someone with no nhl experience,we already have lots of that.

Could we talk someone with NHL experience in to working with Eakins? That might be a tough sell in itself?

Avatar
#45 Yaz
April 23 2014, 04:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

@2004Z06

Big yes on Huddy..Also bring up Nelson as an assistant, Smith and Bucky gone . That way when Eakins falls flat on his face 20 games into next year it is all on him and we can move Nelson up as in interim HC if Mac T doesn't just take over the job, either way Nelson deserves a hell of a lot more than the entitled ones in the 6 rings club. Note I have given up that 6 rings will throw in the towel, that would be the best thing that could happen in advance of Eakins face plant.

Avatar
#46 Randaman
April 23 2014, 04:28PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
7
cheers
Wildcard wrote:

Already planning for McDavid?

Ladies and Gentlemen, this is what's wrong with the fanbase. A loser mentality that supports tanking year in year out.

What do you expect when we have been subjected to this loser mentality management group for soooooooo looonnnggg? Garbage in, garbage out.

Back to the article; Out with Smith & Bucky, in with Nelson for the defence and Oates for the power play.

Avatar
#47 gk1980
April 23 2014, 04:33PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
3
cheers

If you think about it, what if the Oilers had hired an experianced NHL coach last year instead of a rookie in Dallas? Would our record have been better? If it would THEN we could say it was the coach all those years. BUT, if the record had remained the same with an experianced coach, then we would hava e better understanding on the state of the team.

A rookie coach leading a bunch of rookie kids is an imppossiblwe way to guage the issue with this club.

It's like a blind pitcher throwing to a blind catcher. Which one is worse? Who's fault is it? The pitcher throwing wild pitched or the catcher who can't see the ball?

(Just an analogy, no disrespect to blind peope)

Avatar
#48 Fresh Mess
April 23 2014, 04:39PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
0
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:

One quibble: everybody down there calls him "Nelly", which is a great familiar nickname.

Effeminate, but not quite nauseating enough to make the grade. I'm sure some oiler fangirls could add a flourish to put it over the top...Nels City..Nelly poo?

Avatar
#49 gus1000
April 23 2014, 04:44PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers
Wildcard wrote:

Already planning for McDavid?

Ladies and Gentlemen, this is what's wrong with the fanbase. A loser mentality that supports tanking year in year out.

Unfortunately the loser mentality starts with management. We fans just keep drinking the kool-aid year in and year out. And then at the end of the season wonder why it didn't work out. We changed a bunch of players around. For every great MacT move: Scrivens, Gordon, Perron, there has been an equally questionable move or attempted move, Labarbera, Gagner extension, Krueger Skyped away. Keep looking down the list on the turnovers, not much has helped.

Remember the old saying, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results.

We have the same guy at the top during all this losing, he brings in the guys like him that he likes, and calls it change -because everyone says MacT is new to GM, so he's new, with the old- Howson, Bucky, Smith etc. as well as our scouting staff is mainly hold overs. The culture is broken in Edmonton.

I kept hearing how great the Pinizotto trade was great,it got us a quality fourth line guy, except we already had him in Mike Brown. Sure we got a 4th for him. Remember the last 4th round pick we turned into a real player?? Me neither. Brown, Gadzic and Hendricks, geez wouldn't it be quite the disruption fourth line.

One other quick example he gets rid of guys like Peckham, and Potter,great they were marginal 6/7 guys. Brought in Fraser, Larsen and Grebeshkov. Really isn't an upgrade there either. But bodies moved, we made changes.

Unfortunately change comes from the top, when the top doesn't see the problem, it is never going to change.

Avatar
#50 tileguy
April 23 2014, 04:47PM
Trash it!
9
trashes
Cheers
1
cheers

Messier

Comments are closed for this article.