WWYDW: Should Edmonton Grab Matt Nieto Off Waivers?

Jonathan Willis
January 04 2017 02:21PM

On Wednesday morning, the San Jose Sharks placed winger Matt Nieto on waivers. Nieto, a jack-of-all-trades player who is only 24 years old was a top-nine forward for current Oilers coach Todd McLellan during their time together in San Jose.

In this week’s edition of What Would You Do Wednesday, we ask whether Edmonton should reunite Nieto with the coach under whom he had his best years.

Nieto was originally selected in the second round of the 2011 Draft out of Boston University, where he played three years under the nose of then-Bruins GM Peter Chiarelli. The Hockey News projected him that year as a two-way forward and praised his skating ability. An unnamed scout offered the following capsule summary to the magazine:

He has good feet and a good skill level. His size is probably his only drawback. If he’s six feet, he’s probably going a lot higher.

Nieto played two years in Boston after being drafted, than jumped to the NHL after just 13 games of minor-league seasoning, debuting for McLellan on the 2013-14 Sharks.

As a rookie, Nieto was used in all situations. At evens he played a lot with good players—Patrick Marleau, Logan Couture, Joe Pavelski, plus Tommy Wingels—and did pretty well. His shot metrics were decent but not spectacular on that team, but the real problem was that he didn’t score the way a player in that situation should have. His 1.34 points/hour ranked 10th on the team, and was on par with an average third-liner league-wide.

He did have solid scoring numbers in spot duty on the power play, and the Sharks did well when he was out on the penalty kill, too.

A year later, Nieto was again playing with quality linemates. His shot metrics improved, but his scoring remained unremarkable—again, his hourly rate (1.25 points/hour) ranked 10th on the team and was in the third-line range league-wide. He played significant minutes on the penalty kill and fared well; he also played on the power play and was less impressive.

Since McLellan’s departure, things have been more difficult for Nieto. His power play time was taken away and his even-strength minutes reduced. He was shifted to more of a defensive specialist role and his point scoring rate fell to fourth-line levels. After scoring 20 total goals in two years under McLellan, he has just 19 points in the season-and-a-bit since his departure.

Cap-wise, Nieto makes just $735,000 and is a restricted free agent this summer.

Summing up:

  • The good: His lines have done a good job of driving puck possession. He’s young and cheap. He plays a well-rounded game and has speed to burn. He has history with McLellan and is a known quantity to Chiarelli as well.
  • The bad: He’s undersized. His career scoring rates and 7.5 shooting percentage at the NHL level suggest a player without the offensive chops to play above the third line long-term.

Would you claim him for the Oilers?  

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including the Edmonton Journal, Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#2 Cheesums
January 04 2017, 02:28PM
Trash it!
19
trashes
Cheers
8
cheers

I'd put in a claim for him but I have a feeling someone above the Oilers grabs him. The log jam on the left wing doesn't make a fit for him right now. But if the team seems so adamant to get Pouliot out (I'm not) then he could be a cheap replacement to fill that role.

Avatar
#4 Cheesums
January 04 2017, 02:31PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:

He is a left shot but plays right wing as well.

Ah my mistake. I'd still definitely put in a claim.

Avatar
#5 Shredder
January 04 2017, 02:45PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

Not sure where we sit with a 50 man list, but if we're worried about adding other players at the deadline then maybe we should let him go. Otherwise I don't think there's a lot of risk in picking him up. Is he worse than Lander?

Avatar
#7 kiaora
January 04 2017, 02:53PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
25
cheers

Player seems like Lander - good solid hockey kid, but lacks the scoring touch necessary for an NHL career. Can dominate at AHL, but will never be a full time NHLer. I'd pass, as it costs a roster spot we might need for playoffs.

Avatar
#8 OilCan2
January 04 2017, 02:56PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
33
cheers

Take him if you are planning on sending Pulujarvi to California.

There's no reason to protect him for the Expansion Draft and we could always use a good skater.

Avatar
#9 MGD
January 04 2017, 03:03PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Wasn't a goalie just waived? I'd probably put a claim in for a decent back-up goaltender - another left-handed forward is not a need right now.

Avatar
#10 Spiel
January 04 2017, 03:06PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
67
cheers

Wait and claim Yakupov when he is waived by St.Louis. 5 healthy scratches and counting for Yak city.

Avatar
#12 vetinari
January 04 2017, 03:13PM
Trash it!
5
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers

Playoff teams need defensive players. Take him but only if he clears waivers and you can send back a like value contract (Pochiro, Yakimov, Moroz?). With Pitlick injured and the team likely going to move on from Hendricks (age) or Pouliot (play) at some point, a depth winger trusted by the coach may be a good addition.

@Willis - Capfriendly.com says that Boston's Anton Khudobin is also on waivers-- would he be a step up on our backup? He's had a mediocre year and clocks in at $1.2M/2 year but posted decent numbers for Anaheim and Carolina in the two previous seasons. Thoughts?

EDIT: beat me to the question!

Avatar
#13 Total Points
January 04 2017, 03:28PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
30
cheers

Oilers dont need another 3rd or 4th liner.

Oilers need to deal with the play of RNH, Eberle and Pouliot. If these three played up to their standards from prior years, the Oilers would have 3 more wins.

They are from the Hall core era and may be upset about the Hall trade, more a question than a statement.

Something is wrong here.

Avatar
#14 Weiss-Johnson1
January 04 2017, 03:32PM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Cheers
6
cheers

Putting a claim in on Khudobin would allow us to put him up for the expansion draft instead of LB. we could then put Gustafson on waivers. Nieto looks to have quick hands and faster than Hendricks if we get rid of him or Pouliot at the trade deadline.

Avatar
#16 Stone Cold Iceman
January 04 2017, 03:50PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
33
cheers

Honestly, I would leave it up to Todd if he thinks this kid should be picked up if we get that chance. He knows this kid well enough, better than a scout would. That is if no one else scoops him. Anything to better the team. Others were against us getting Russell. I knew what we were getting and he WANTS to remain in AB. He has made me happy with signing here. But that's just my opinion.

Avatar
#17 Trainreck Is Over??
January 04 2017, 04:00PM
Trash it!
37
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers
Total Points wrote:

Oilers dont need another 3rd or 4th liner.

Oilers need to deal with the play of RNH, Eberle and Pouliot. If these three played up to their standards from prior years, the Oilers would have 3 more wins.

They are from the Hall core era and may be upset about the Hall trade, more a question than a statement.

Something is wrong here.

Everyone who was associated with the Hall core needs to go, management and players included. This franchise will be cursed as long as Lowe and his unqualified minions continue to draw a paycheque.

Avatar
#18 Spurzey
January 04 2017, 04:06PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers

No dust on the one timer!

Avatar
#19 Mitch92
January 04 2017, 04:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
11
cheers

Plucking a player off the waiver wire is always a gamble. Why was he waived in the first (or second or third or...) place? On one hand he could be a cheap warm body to fill out the season with who can step in when inevitable injuries happen. On the other hand there will be opportunities at better players as play-off hopeful teams attempt to shore up their rosters ahead of the trade deadline. We will want to have a roster spot or two available for when sudden opportunities arise.

Avatar
#20 Ron Burgundy
January 04 2017, 04:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers

No to Nieto I'd say. But too bad Ty Rattie didn't make it down to us! I'd have to guess Chia put a claim in for him, but our success this year means we are well down the waiver priority list.

On a related note, the Canes now have 7 players who can play RW. They also have a number of interesting D prospects, and are likely going to struggle with the cap floor next season. Possible trade partner for one of our bigger contracts?

Avatar
#21 IRONman
January 04 2017, 04:53PM
Trash it!
13
trashes
Cheers
12
cheers

Ebs line 3 now

Here comes trade. Hope your happy.

Hall trade was sad, the one is hmmmm

Avatar
#22 a lg dubl dubl
January 04 2017, 04:53PM
Trash it!
8
trashes
Cheers
23
cheers

Pick him up! Can't be worse than Pouliot.

I would also waive Pouliot in the process.

Avatar
#23 FISTO Siltanen
January 04 2017, 05:12PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Cheers
22
cheers
Jonathan Willis wrote:

I believe they're currently at 48 names against the 50-man list.

Does Pouliot count as a player?

Avatar
#24 btrain
January 04 2017, 05:42PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Cheers
28
cheers
Trainreck Is Over?? wrote:

Everyone who was associated with the Hall core needs to go, management and players included. This franchise will be cursed as long as Lowe and his unqualified minions continue to draw a paycheque.

It's time to stop with the Lowe and Co. blaming. How does dwelling and blaming past management/players do anything helpful in the present. This type of thinking perfectly represents the meaning of the expression "kicking a dead horse". It's time to move on and if you have any current issue with management and the roster, you call out Chia. To do anything otherwise undermines his competency and ability to make his own decisions and run an NHL team.

Avatar
#25 OilCan2
January 04 2017, 06:07PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
10
cheers
Spiel wrote:

Wait and claim Yakupov when he is waived by St.Louis. 5 healthy scratches and counting for Yak city.

They do not want to give us the conditional second rounder.

Avatar
#27 Seriously Bored
January 04 2017, 07:04PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
13
cheers
OilCan2 wrote:

They do not want to give us the conditional second rounder.

3 goals in 21 games. There is no way he would hit 15 over 82 anyways.

Avatar
#28 Ever the Optimist
January 04 2017, 07:09PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
17
cheers

I would personally say no to Nieto as we have options to fill the third line like slepyshev.

One that might be worth more to us would not be a waiver pick up but the last of Martin Hazals contract. Last few years he has dominated the face off dot. He has a positive corsi relalative on a horrible team. would slot in nicely as 2nd/3rd center and allow hopkins or draistl to play wing higher up the batting order.

Avatar
#29 Rama Lama
January 04 2017, 07:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
20
cheers

I think we have a lot better options either now or upcoming. I for one am sick and tired trying to buy on the low/down, and waiting for something big.

I'm troubled by our last three games as it seems something is not quite right.......maybe the flu bug?

Just seems like the team is out of sync!

Avatar
#30 Finnish Oiler fan in Edmonton89
January 04 2017, 07:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
OilCan2 wrote:

They do not want to give us the conditional second rounder.

I would say this is the case if he had like 10-12 goals right now

Not the case though, He's scratched because he's not producing and he is a liability

Avatar
#31 hockey1099
January 04 2017, 09:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
21
cheers

Good advanced stats? Well hell yes let's claim him. Yeah corsi. Or maybe not. Can't score, adds to our 50 man list and is a winger not a center. Low or no scoring wingers aren't valuable. We have lander he is damn good at not scoring in the NHL, killing penalties and can win face-offs quite well. Why waste a contract on players we already have in the system.

Avatar
#32 Scratch
January 04 2017, 10:50PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Cheers
9
cheers
Total Points wrote:

Oilers dont need another 3rd or 4th liner.

Oilers need to deal with the play of RNH, Eberle and Pouliot. If these three played up to their standards from prior years, the Oilers would have 3 more wins.

They are from the Hall core era and may be upset about the Hall trade, more a question than a statement.

Something is wrong here.

Definitely, this road trip may answer a lot of questions, if they don't pull up their skates for the next 3 games the playoff hope will be flickering. I just don't get why Puljarvi is still up here and worse why at the time of the draft he was a coin toss with Laine but he's complete bust here..All the scouts cannot be wrong and we're screwing the kid up. Also Pouliot needs press box time along with Hendricks who unfortunately is past his due date. I just don't like the teams energy and how they come out of the gate. We need more Patrick Maroons and some new blood from the farm

Avatar
#33 Spydyr
January 05 2017, 08:36AM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Cheers
2
cheers
IRONman wrote:

Ebs line 3 now

Here comes trade. Hope your happy.

Hall trade was sad, the one is hmmmm

I'm pretty sure that Eberle's effort and production on the ice has a lot more to do with him being on the third line than comments on Oilernation.

Comments are closed for this article.