More Ales Hemsky trade rumours!

He’s no Roberto Luongo, but Ales Hemsky is no stranger to trade rumours. The lead-up to last season’s trade deadline featured his name prominently in proposed and rumoured deals; it caught many by surprise when the Oilers opted to re-sign him rather than trade him.

With NHL hockey on its way back, the rumours seem to have started again.

Why I don’t buy *these* rumours

The Fourth Period, which bills itself as “Hockey’s Lifestyle Magazine” says that Hemsky could be on the move in exchange for a young defenceman and specifically cites four Eastern Conference teams as possibly having an interest in the player: the Panthers, Devils, Islanders and Jets.

The piece is here. Personally, I don’t buy it for a bunch of reasons:

  • One of the players cited as going the other way – TFP goes so far as to say a league source told them the Jets and Oilers “could soon explore a deal” involving him – is Zach Bogosian. Bogosian had wrist surgery at the end of August and was expected to miss between four and six months; he skated for the first time since the surgery just four days ago. That makes it hard to include him in a deal.
  • Also, Bogosian had a great year last season filling in when guys like Enstrom and Byfuglien were out of the lineup; it seems a stretch to say the Jets are looking to deal him now.
  • The piece describes the Oilers defence as Justin Schultz “leading a defensive corps that includes veterans Ryan Whitney, Ladislav Smid and Nick Schultz” and makes no mention of Jeff Petry – the 25-year old who led the team in ice-time per game last year and is expected to form one half of the first pairing.
  • The piece also describes the Oilers second line as Sam Gagner, Ryan Smyth and Ales Hemsky – despite expectations that Smyth will start the year on the third line alongside Shawn Horcoff. This isn’t a critical mistake – we haven’t seen the Oilers lines yet, after all – but it seems odd.

Put it all together and there’s no reason to think that The Fourth Period has any special knowledge of internal Oilers discussions regarding Ales Hemsky. There’s also no reason to believe they, or their "league source" have any special knowledge of internal Jets conversations. 

Why Hemsky might get dealt anyway

While I don’t find these specific rumours credible, an Ales Hemsky trade continues to be well within the realm of possibility.

The Oilers have strength on the wings, much of it extremely young. They have needs elsewhere. Hemsky, particularly given his injury history, is a valuable player but seems to be seen as a guy the club could move forward without.

The Oilers could probably use another defenceman, too. The addition of Justin Schultz helps a lot, and there’s a fairly decent supporting cast, but a top-pairing defender could dramatically change the complexion of the team. Hemsky’s probably not going to bring that guy back in trade, but the idea of swapping him for another top-four guy to round out the group, or as part of a package for a big centre is plausible.

We also know the Oilers are interested in making a move. The “wow factor” move that Bob Stauffer brought up this fall generated considerable discussion, and even though that move now seems unlikely, it was all but confirmed at the time by Kevin Lowe. I’m convinced there were legitimate discussions, and reviewing the Oilers’ assets Hemsky hits the sweet spot of having value but also being tradable.

Put shortly: a trade wouldn’t surprise me. What would surprise me is if the unknown author behind The Fourth Period’s report has actual knowledge of such a trade.

Recently by Jonathan Willis

  • Clyde Frog

    Yeah trade away a seasoned .75+ PPG player because those totally grow on trees….

    I get the injury concerns, but we would need a really good return to pass up on a developed player that is dangerous everytime he steps on the ice; trading him away for magic beans or a serious project only hurts this team… badly…

    Especially considering our secondary scoring seems to be slow in developing on the farm.

  • Locksmithluke

    G’day gentleman. After reading this article and the comments that followed, I’m going to go out on a limb here, I see everything staying status quo until the end of the abbreviated season. Quite simply I don’t think we have anything of value to offer, that we’re willing to give up, that would benefit the team on the other end in return for that solid “D” or a viable net minder. The talk of the “WOW” trade has seemingly dissipated over the last two months, and we are looking at starting the campaign up Shultz and Yak. (Two positive attributes no less) I was truly hoping that the organization would address the two glaring weaknesses, but personally don’t see it happening. In question, do any of you feel that the Oil will put something together to stopgap the “D” or “G” issue, or are we playing the “wait and see” scenario?

  • the one guy i would look at from new jersery for hemsky is david clarkson. he is exactly the type of player who edmonton does not have but needs badly. big, hits, fights, and scores. as long as ryan w is healthy i think the defence will be better then what is projected