Allen Iverson’s rant on practice is a classic. Iverson had sat out a practice and it became a huge story in Philly. When Iverson retired Gary Payton told the story how in the summer prior to this interview Iverson had asked him how he was able to keep his body fresh and play every game. Payton told him his head coach, George Karl, wouldn’t let him practice very much. Karl knew he was a smaller guard and he needed rest to keep his body healthy. Iverson took it to heart, but he might not have went about it the right way.

It is still a great rant, and it relates to the Oilers because of what Ladislav Smid and Ilya Bryzgalov said regarding the pace and intensity of their new team’s practices.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

After his first practice with the Calgary Flames, Smid said he was surprised at how intense the practice was, and last week Ilya Brzygalov said the Wild practices had “a much faster pace.

Do the Oilers need to practice harder? Can they practice harder?

I went looking for the answers to those questions and a few more. I spoke with Dallas Eakins, Sam Gagner and David Perron about the Oilers practices.

I spoke to Perron because he was in St.Louis the previous six seasons, and I was curious if he noticed a difference in how the teams practiced.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Do you think it is up
to the players to control the pace and tempo practice?

I do. Dallas
mentioned it a lot. Do you want to be the guy driving the practice or do you
want to sit in the back of the bus and hope the day goes by, and that’s not a
way you get better. It’s up to us to bring that level higher. I think it has
improved over the season, but there is another level to get to for sure.

How can you make
practices more intense?

It’s pretty simple. Every time there is a rebound you try to
score. Every time you go by the net you stop. The hard work comes
with the habits. When you have good habits it brings your level higher because
you want to succeed.

If you’re not going to do it in the game, you have to start
doing it in practice and then it will translate in the game. You will go by the
net and it will be natural that you will stop. Early in the year we didn’t have
many guys going to the net, but I think it has gotten better and when we do
have one-on-one battles in practice we can be harder for sure.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

What differences have
you noticed from practices in St.Louis to Edmonton?

Here they are a bit longer and we have more explanation at
the board. I’m not sure if it’s because we are a younger team and having to explain
more system stuff.

In St. Louis it
(practice) was pretty short, because when you’ve been on the same team for a bit
you’re on the same page, and that’s why they are having success and that’s what
we are trying to get to here.


The Oilers are younger than the Blues and Eberle, Nugent-Hopkins, Hall, Yakupov, J.Schultz and Petry have had a new coach every season they’ve played. It makes sense that this team needs more teaching and likely why their practices don’t have a consistent flow as often as a veteran team like the Blues.

The Oilers still don’t go to the net as often as they should, but Perron was bang on that at least they are doing it more than they did earlier in the season. The issue with the Oilers top-six isn’t the individual talent of the players, rather that they are essentially all the same. Outside of Perron, the other five didn’t have a “drive-the-net” philosophy in junior. It is hard to completely alter a player’s game, and that’s why I believe this group needs a different mix of players. They are all too similar.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below



Sam Gagner has played his entire career in Edmonton. He’s had five different head coaches and I asked him his thoughts on the pace and intensity of Oilers practice.

Some former teammates
said the pace in practice was higher on their new team. Perron said your team’s
pace was lower at the start of the season, but it has improved throughout the
year. Have you noticed a difference, and if so in what way?

I think a lot of times when you are going to a new team you
are flying and stuff, and that first practice is going to be tough regardless.
For us, pace starts with puck movement and I think it has gotten better as the
year’s gone on. If you are going to be a successful team in this league you
have to be able to execute. That is something we are really focusing on, especially
in practice, and we have to continue to get better if we’re going to become one
of the top teams in the league. We still have a way to go.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Do you believe if you
practice harder maybe they will play harder and grittier?

I’m a huge believer in it. I’ve always thought when you are
in a slump you break it in practice before you break it in a game. You’re not
always going to feel great in practice, whether you played a game the night
before, but you have to find a way to get the most out of yourself, execute
properly and move the puck properly and get your pace going. It translates into
a game hugely.

Is the pace of
practice set more by the players or the coach?

I think the coach is driving the practice and we’re the ones
pushing it. The coaches have a practice plan and they lay it out, but it is on us to
make sure we are pushing it.


Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Gagner was on to something about the first practice with a new team. Smid’s first practice in Calgary came after an off day for the Flames and when he was traveling. However, Gagner did admit his team still has room to improve in practice.

A few years ago I interviewed Nick Lidstrom and he told me that bad passes weren’t acceptable during Red Wings practices. Players would get on each other if they made bad passes. He firmly believed that if you accepted bad passing in practice it would happen in the game. Mike Babcock said those rules were put in place by the players not the coaches, because the players needed to manage and decide which passes weren’t acceptable. He said it carried more weight when a teammate challenged a player on his passing rather than the coach.

The Oilers don’t have something like that in place, and if they do implement a similar rule, it has to be initiated by the players not the coach.


Dallas Eakins 18

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Do you have a response to what Bryzgalov said last week and Smid earlier in the
season about the difference in the pace and intensity of practice?

I would totally agree with them. In the Smid case, he traveled the whole day and his first practice came after a day off and of
course that will be a high-paced practice.

In Bryz’s case he is excited; he is going to a team that is coming off the
trade deadline where they made some moves to try and take a good swat at the
Stanley Cup. After that deadline I’m sure their practice was very exciting to
get the new players in.

Did they have great pace in those practices, absolutely? But
I will tell you this. I’ve watched a lot of teams practice in the NHL, teams
that have come into our building and a lot of times when your team is struggling
you go watch to make sure you aren’t missing something. I put our practices up
against anybody in the league and I’ve seen some very good teams practice that,
boy, there was no pace.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

It was more rest, move the puck and conserve for the
game. There are so many different ways you can skin the cat getting ready for
the game. But for our team right now, when it’s supposed to be pace, we go after the
pace, but a lot of time it has been about teaching.

How much do you feel
is on you to set the pace, or how much of it is up to the players to set the

I think it is up to everyone. It is up to the players to
push each other; it is up to the coach to make sure they are going. The
structure of the practice depending on the day of the week and how many games
they’ve played, what you need to work on, that usually dictates the real pace
of the practice is what you are trying to accomplish.

If you are coming off a day off and you don’t play for a couple days, that’s going
to be a tough, hard battle, very high-paced practice. When you’re playing every
other day you might be just working on your powerplay, which slows down the
practice. And for our group, especially this year, we’ve had to do so much
teaching that you are stopping practice and going into the details and trying to
hammer home these new concepts and new habits. You could go watch a team
practice five different days and each day the pace would be greatly, greatly

Is the plan to have
less whiteboard time next year which will increase the pace of practice?

Exactly. The less you have to go to the board, but more
importantly, the less you have to stop the drill and make sure everybody is in
the right spots and re-enforce it, then you can get on to other stuff.

You have to be careful with pace in practice. We can go out
and do a whole bunch of shooting drills that look nice and shiny and everyone
will be skating fast, but they have little to do with the structure of the
game. There are days you want the pace high, and there are days where you need
the detail and the teaching. Our team right now, much less than at the start of
year, we are still in the teaching phase and we are not going to let the
details go.


  • The Oilers top players aren’t very physical or gritty, so I wouldn’t expect them to be in practice. They are also young and inexperienced and they keep turning over the puck in games, so I understand why the coach is still spending a lot of time on the whiteboard. I still don’t think they battle as hard as they should — Perron said the same — but I think that is also a product of the make up of this team.

    The Oilers don’t have a very big or aggressive blueline. Prior to Mark Fraser’s arrival, Andrew Ference was the only D-man who would play physical. I’ve watched Fraser in practice and he doesn’t go easy on the forwards. That will help them. If they are never exposed to playing against big, mean and aggressive defenders in practice, it makes sense that they would struggle against them in a game. Fraser at least gives them an idea of how hard it will be to go to the net or come out the corner against a big D-man. Petry, J.Schultz, N.Schultz, Potter and Larsen never presented that challenge.

    I remember watching Steve Staios, Jason Smith and Ethan Moreau practice. Smith and Staios practiced like they played, and they used to have some great battles with Moreau. I believe that helped them during games.

    The Oilers are starting to get a few more players like that. Hendricks brings an edge to practice as does Gordon and Perron, but until the Oilers get more skilled players with size I don’t see this issue being solved. You practice like you play and the Oilers aren’t blessed with many big, strong or aggressive players right now. They also don’t have a lot of “old man” strength in their top-six. The Oilers skilled players will be much better and stronger when they are all 24 years of age and older, but they currently they lack the size and strength to compete with other teams.

    I still would like to see a bit more intensity in the battle drills, but like Perron and Gagner said that has to come from the players.

  • I watched last night’s game from the lower bowl and the size difference of the Oilers and Kings was even more obvious. If you don’t believe the Oilers need more size in their top-six now, then I’m not sure what games you’ve been watching. I thought the Oilers overall effort was fine, they just aren’t as big, mature and experienced as the Kings. The Kings could manhandle the Oilers when they wanted to, and until this team matures and adds some skilled size I don’t see that changing.
  • Jordan Nolan sucker punches Jesse Joensuu and nothing happens to him. I didn’t see anyone even mouth him off when he was on the ice in the 3rd period. I’m sure Gazdic said something from the bench, but I don’t understand why he wasn’t put on the ice against Nolan. The score was 4-2 with 10 minutes to play, did anyone think the stingy Kings were going to relinquish the lead? For me it was another example of showing teams they can get away with anything against the Oilers.

    At some point isn’t it important to send a message, other than the one that says it is okay to take liberties on our players?

  • I’m looking for a travel agent or agency to team up with me for a great fundraiser. If you are interested please email me at [email protected].
  • Oscar Klefbom is a now considered a regular recall and will make his NHL debut in Minnesota tomorrow.
  • Is coaching on the verge of ruining hockey? One NHL sniper thinks it is. Read here.


  • Cold Hard Truth

    JG………..I respect your need to defend Dallas.

    I for one do not give a rat’s ass how the team practices or what the players say about practicing on other teams.

    What most fans care about is seeing improvement………..even incremental improvement. If we improved in any metric, fans would probably lay off this guy. The sad fact is we have NOT improved in any area of the game, except dietary may be.

    • Jason Gregor

      Your hatred for the coach doesn’t allow you to read an article without bias. I never defended his actions. I said I wished they had more intensity in practice, but pointed out that the players aren’t a group of aggressive players.

      Also it is a fact that the Oilers aren’t that big or strong yet. If you go hard in practice on off days they won’t be fresh on game days.

      You can interpret it however you like, but the fact remains this team’s lack of size and aggression is equal in games and practice. I also don’t expect a coach to magically make a D team into a B or A team. Eakins might not be the solution, but putting more of the blame on the coach than the players and management is ridiculous. We’ve seen how that works… Some don’t want to face the truth that this group of players don’t have the right mix to win, regardless of who is coaching them. Hopefully MacTavish sees it and makes more changes. I suspect he will.

      • Death Metal Nightmare

        i think people knew LONG ago this wasnt the right mix while media like you were propping up Sam Gagner to be a potential 70 point player while touting the “he’s only __ years old…” BS.

        his game was apparent in deficiencies that his size and strength are never going to over come at 21+ years old. but people still held that hope there and then they overpaid him at 5 million bucks. then this season “everyone finally comes around”. too late, geniuses.

        as for the rest of the group, we’ve known for multiple seasons that this was children mixed with very mediocre-to-poor vets that are forced into roles they can’t handle.

        and still we had to have the “sexy” coach come in while nothing got fixed on the roster in any qualitative/substantial way.

        it’s obviously a delicate/micro situation when you’re this horrendous but the management has done itself little favor when it falls in love with sad players for too long… we’re seeing this trend constantly as they try to think they can outsmart the rest of the league using trash to improve.

        if i had to guess, this group of “smart guys” over thinks how to put a team together. they dig so far into detail that they start to sell themselves on mediocre as hell players (Horcoff, Ference, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc) and then just sit in the tar pit. it’s time outside perspectives come into this group. their thinking is way too stale. whether it’s through firings, etc…

        drown in a fishbowl

    • toprightcorner

      True the team is still not very good but if you think the team has not improved you are mistaken. The team is 1 game under .500 since Dec 27th. Sure it still isn’t playoff making winning percentage but it is an improvement.

      You have a hate on the coach and you will always be biased by that when having an opinion.

      • A-Mc

        No hate is a strong word. I do not hate him at all in fact I like his personality for the most part.

        What I HATE is not seeing any improvement and the general inability to motivate his star players.

        If the players are to blame ( including the stars of the team) then bench them. Bring in AHL players to send the message to the stars that NOT giving a total effort has ramifications!!

        Has Dallas done that………no and that’s a big part of coaching, do you not agree?

        • nuge2drai

          Oiler Domination To Follow

          I HATE when Eakins preaches accountability but favours players like Gagner and uses players like Yakupov as a punching bag.

          What I HATE is not seeing Eberle get benched after a no look pass on the tape of the opponents stick.

          I HATE the 1-3-1 power play Eakins seems to think is hard to defend.

          Other than that I actually like Eakins personality.

    • R U Kidding Me!

      You don’t care about practice? That tells me you have no clue how teams are supposed to improve.

      I care about having a plan and sticking with it, something this organization hasn’t done for four years.

      This fan is sick of fans like you once again asking for the coaches head, but ignoring the truth. The players aren’t that good. I don’t know if Eakins is good or not, likely not, but I know the players aren’t and no coach wins with bad players.

      They had 20 good games last year and then sucked down the stretch. Where did they improve under Krueger? They didn’t improve under Renney either, because the players aren’t that good.

      MacTavish needs to improve our blueline and get some beef in our top six..until that happens, we are probably googling McDavid goals next year.

  • R U Kidding Me!

    Best way to fix boring defensive hockey.

    Give an extra point in the standing for every 5 goals scored in a game.

    Win 5-0 Winner gets 3 points loser zero points.
    Win 10-5 Winner gets 4 points loser gets one point

    Teams will try to score more. Fans will be happier and it would be prudent for the coach to think more offensive

    • R U Kidding Me!

      Don’t think I agree.

      There’s nothing boring about a team that forechecks and backchecks hard and plays a possession game (see Chicago).

      Do you think giving extra reward for more offense will make watching guys like JShultz and Gagner and Eberle (all of whom probably play better defense on NHL14 than in real life) better more entertaining players to watch? Right now all they think about is offense, and they are horrible to watch.

      • **

        I would argue that the point he is trying to make is that teams would put more effort in scoring tons of goals as opposed to closing up the doors and windows and holding strong when they get the 1-0 lead.

        Watching a 1-0 game is the most boring hockey for fans, so what he’s suggesting is giving an incentive for teams to try and open up and force the offensive side of the game.

        Now maybe a scaling of 1 point for every 5 goals is a bit ridiculous…but it is one possible solution to what is becoming boring hockey to watch.

        • nuge2drai

          The Canadian Men’s hockey team in Sochi did not score much and they played a possession game featuring heavy backcheck/forecheck (ie. every puck was challenged).

          Assuming you watched them, did you find them boring at all?

          I would give my left nut to have the Oilers break up the cycle, retrieve the puck and break it out of their zone like Team Canada did, just once per game at this point. It was poetry to watch.

          • **

            To me the most remarkable achievement of team Canada was how they played their systems to perfection without really practicing much and barely playing together at all.

          • **

            You’re watching the absolute best players in the game, who can break up the cycle, retrieve the puck, and work magic anywhere on the ice. They drastically out-shot their opponents and should have won their games by much higher margins. It was also exciting hockey for you because you’re used to watching the losing Oilers play. That is why it was “poetry to watch”.

            Watch the Minnesota Wild, LA Kings, Tampa Bay Lightning (under Guy), NJ Devils, and you will agree that a hard defensive game is EXTREMELY boring to watch for one simple reason: THEY SIT ON SMALL LEADS.

            I’ve been watching Tampa for years, and when they did their defensive 1-3-1 strategy it was the most boring hockey you would ever watch. Because they’d get their lead with a Lecaviler/StLouis/Richards/Stamkos go ahead goal and just sit on it.

            So if the NHL did something to improve this whether it be coaching or rules, I would like to see more offensive games.

          • A-Mc

            I see your point; that’s fine.

            But…I’m just sick and tired of how they Oilers come out and want to be like the Harlem Globetrotters on ice. It all has to be tic-tac-toe. No need to actually back-check and go hard to the net for a greasy rebound and heaven forbid, maybe initiate contact.

            I get the want to see offense. And I get that the team that scores most wins. But, I’m just a little tired of continuing to see guys like Gagner and Eberle only show interest in scoring and not give a rat’s ass when the puck is in their zone.

            Team Canada was a team for the ages, we all can agree on that. But it doesn’t take the best players in the world to contest every puck and backcheck. It takes will, which is something I’m pretty sure most if not all of us can agree that the Oilers don’t have nearly enough of.

    • toprightcorner

      I’m not sure your idea would ever fly with the hockey purest crowd but I do think there is some merit in your suggestion.

      We need to find some way to convince coaches that scoring goals is important. Give them a reason to score as many as possible and not just kick one in and then play shut down defense the rest of the game.

    • A-Mc

      I dont know if that’s the solution but i certainly appreciate the suggestion!

      Interesting… I must let my mind wander a bit to contemplate what that’d look like over 82 games.

  • A-Mc

    I do understand everyone’s frustration about the coach.

    But…. WHO HIRED the Coach?

    Who drafted the players?

    Who makes the trades and sign’s the overpaid contracts?

    This is where the problem lies.. It is not the coach. It is the leadership and management of the team.

    All you problems will not get better until Lowe et al. (including Mac T) are gone.

    The Oilers are a recycle plant for all the NHL garbage (a personal quote from an individual friend who is in management of another NHL club).

    The Oilers will not get better until they have new management to introduce a culture change ie not losing and then can gain some respect of the other teams management to attempt some decent trades.

    • A-Mc

      I want to agree with your statement, on a philosophical level, but i just can’t right now. MacT continues to earn more of my respect with each move he’s made since he arrived here.

      The players has has brought in are clearly better than what we were working with before.

      The coaching situation has been a revolving door since MacT left and it’s a total no brainer that it will take some serious time and effort to work out all the bad habits this team has perpetuated over the last 4 years.

      I don’t think Eakins has been afforded any real coaching time yet with relation to making the team better. I think this year has been more about putting out fires and breaking bad habits. Things always get worse before they get better. I expect a better team next year, based on coaching continuity alone.

  • Puck_In_Throat

    I know that Eakins is taking a lot of heat here, and part of that is his own fault. He shot his mouth off a bit at the start of the year talking about how his system was going to make a big difference.

    But I have to say what has been said by other people: even a great coach can’t coach a team full of bad players to the finals.

    Exhibit A: Ken Hitchcock – coaches a Stacked Dallas team to 5 straight years of 1st place (division) finishes; sacked when performance drops (coincidence: Brett Hull retires and the Stars lose 39 goals and 75 points).

    Hitch coaches Philly to divisional finishes of 1st, 2nd, 1st, 2nd – fired in year 5 with a 1-6-1 start. Goalies for philly all have GAA of above 3.00 and Biron is tops for sv% at .908. ouch

    Hitch coaches CBJ to a 20 point improvement over 3 years, culminating in their first playoff appearance. Columbus is eliminated in the first round. Hitch is fired the next year when it becomes clear 60 games in that they will not make the playoffs.

    Hitch takes a year off and is hired by the Blues. They finish (divisional) 1st, 2nd, and soon-to-be 1st.

    Did Hitch all of a sudden become a bad coach in 2002 (fired from Dallas), 2006 (1-6-1 start in philly) and from 2006-2010 in Columbus where his best finish was 4th in the division?

    Or is it more likely that a good coach can only win with a good team?

    All those who say it is “Eakins fault”, you may be correct in saying that a good coach could get more out of the team (hello Ralph), but what Gregor and others are getting at is that this TEAM sucks, and that it wouldn’t matter if Scotty Freakin Bowman himself came out of retirement to coach these guys. The Oil would still suck.

    • Benny Botts

      You’re comparing a guy that started head coaching in the NHL in 1995 to a first year coach… seems a bit drastic to me no??..

      Though I agree with all your other points

  • Cold Hard Truth

    Eakins, Gagner, and Perron play down the comments made on the pace of Oilers’ practice? Surprise, surprise. Ask them again once one of them leaves the team. You’ll get an honest answer.

  • nuge2drai

    Gregor, give me your thoughts here:

    2014 1st pick (likely 2nd overall) for Sean Couturier and a second round pick. Perhaps Philly really likes Ekblad and can live with Giroux and Schenn as its 1-2 punch

    Gagner + Klefbom + a couple mid round picks for Yandle

    Then you take a run at Winnik, Goc and Kulemin this summer







    Ference/Fedun or Fraser

    I don’t know if Yandle is the guy we need but he is an improvement and has been rumored to be available for a couple years.

    • nuge2drai

      Oiler Domination To Follow

      I would rather overpay for a center like Statsny and keep the draft pick.

      Draft Bennett or Reinhert and we finally have some depth at center.

      Hopkins – Statsny – Bennett – Gordan

      Trade Gagner for a #3-#4 defenseman.

      Spend the remaining 30+ million in cap space on Defense, preferably on 2-3 year deals.

      • nuge2drai

        Also that centre depth would get crushed the same as ours right now. Statsny wouldn’t thrive here and Bennett is another young guy. We need vets, no more rookie.

        • toprightcorner

          Why would you think Statsney wouldn’t thrive here? What evidence is ther to back that up? He has been playing with young guys in Colorado and thrived so history would suggest he should do fine here. If your going to say he won’t thrive in Edmonton please use evidence to back up your claim.

          Not that I want Statsny, we would have to pay well over $6 mill for him (makes $6.6 now) and I would rather spend that big number on a #1 dman.

          If the Oilers drafted Bennet or Reinhart I would hope that either one would go back to junior. They are not elite playes like Hall, McKinnon, Nuge, Duchene or Tavares. They are closer to a Yakopov or slightly lower and Yak would have benefited from another year of junior. Just casue a player is a top 5 pick doesn’t mean he needs to play in the NHL, just look at Drouin.

    • toprightcorner

      It could take more than a 1st to get Couturier as he was a 1st round pick and has proven he is not a bust.

      Phoenix already has Ribero, Hanzal and Vermette for centres, they don’t need Gagner and may be more inclined to trade Hanzal to upgrade their wingers

      Your not playing Goc and Kulimen ahead of Gordon and Perron as these two are clearly better.

      Trade the 1st and Arcobello for Hanzal
      Sign Orpik
      Sign Brian Boyle
      Sign Winnik
      Sign Setagouchi
      Trade Eberle for Josi
      Trade Gagner, Klefbom,for Brouwer
      Trade Lander for Smith-Pelly

      Hall – Nuge – Brouwer
      Perron – Hanzal – Yak
      Winnik – Gordon – Smith-Pelly
      Gazdic – Boyle – Hendricks

      Josi – Petry
      Orpik – Schultz
      Ference – Marincin

  • Zarny

    We have Nick Lidstrom stating it was the players in Detroit, not Mike Babcock, that held each other accountable and demanded more.

    And yet we still have drivel about the Oilers’ coaching.

    It’s the players, stupid.

  • R U Kidding Me!

    Nothing frustrates and pisses me off more than seeing these players time and time again not sticking up for each other.

    This isn’t something you can teach, some of these guys have to go.


    Man it’s like this is Russia and Eakins and his buddies in the media are Putin and the oiler fans are the Russian people. We have lived through all of your promises and propaganda and nothing has changed. The worst thing is like all regimes is you think the people are idiots and you can fool us with your propaganda sorry guys WE ARE NOT FOOLED.