Blues’ blunder likely ends possibility of trade with Edmonton

Remember all of those optimistic columns about a potential trade between Edmonton and St. Louis for the No. 2/3 centre the Oilers would love to add?

There was a complication on Thursday, as the Blues lost the excellent Vladimir Sobotka to the KHL, potentially for the next three seasons.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below


Sobotka was an outstanding centre.

At even-strength, he was capable of playing tough minutes, and despite that consistently outpaced his team in terms of out-shooting the opposition. He wasn’t just an excellent five-on-five player; he played in all situations, including both special teams.

Just 5’10”, the solidly-built (197 pound) pivot was a consistent physical presence. We’ve talked about him as a two-way threat and he was in the truest sense – he posted 33 points in 61 games last season, which is a pretty decent number for a supporting player.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

He was also the best faceoff man in the NHL last season, winning 61.9 percent of his draws.

The Blues

General manager Doug Armstrong tacitly criticized Sobotka’s willingness to consider a KHL offer, and implied that the Blues’ refusal to meet his demands had some higher principle at its heart.

“The League goes on. No one person can be more important than the fabric of the CBA,” Armstrong was quoted as saying by Puck Daddy’s Greg Wyshynski.

Yeah, right.

The reality is that the Blues got greedy. That same Wyshynski piece hits the highlights; St. Louis paid Sobotka just $1.3 million per year over the last three seasons, making him one of the very best bargains in the NHL. Despite that, the best offer cited in the piece was a two-year deal with a $3.0 million cap hit.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

So when Avangard Omsk came calling with a three-year deal that included out-clauses after every season and a $4.0 million salary (did we mention the tax situation in Russia is better than in St. Louis) this was a no-brainer:

Sobotka did nothing wrong. The Blues played hardball and took him to arbitration, so rather than submit to the team’s demands he looked at other options. He wasn’t under contract, so he was perfectly within his rights to consider playing in another league, and he certainly didn’t threaten the “fabric of the CBA.”

The Oilers

Craig MacTavish9

One imagines the Oilers would have been pretty open to Sobotka, who despite being on the small side has a well-deserved reputation as fierce competitor. The Blues certainly would have been better off trading Sobotka’s rights, once it became clear that the 27-year-old was going to investigate other options. Either the Blues didn’t know he was or they decided to ignore the possibility; either way, it was a blunder that cost them the loss of an excellent player for nothing.

That bad news isn’t just that Edmonton doesn’t have a shot at Sobotka now, but also that this makes it more difficult for the Blues to deal a centre. Sure, they signed Steve Ott, who turns 32 next month; he’s another combative, undersized pivot but he’s at the wrong end of his career curve and was awfully ineffective both in Buffalo and St. Louis last season. He’s much more of a gamble than Sobotka, and with the heightened risk comes the increased probability that the Blues would be reluctant to deal one of their other centremen.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

There aren’t a lot of teams out there who might be willing to deal a centre; this doesn’t help.


  • AHL going to new format test for overtime that NHL might implement the next season after this year. 7 minute overtime 4 on 4 for first 3 minutes , and reduced to 3 on 3 with first whistle after 3 minutes for last 4 minutes . Do you think this would be beneficial to our squad ? Trash for No , Cheers for YES .

    • Craig1981

      The NHL union is a huge hurdle in this. They are very weary of adding an extra 5 min to the overtime. It might not seem like much, but when teams often fly out to other cities as soon as they undress, players don’t want to have to spend 2.5 min on the ice and maybe 10 more min in total time.

      Complain all you want about spoiled players, its their right to refuse.

  • kab

    First about the overtime issue. I do not think that the team concept should be taken out of the game–like Basketball which is more about the individual stars on teams than the teams. Therefore I feel that overtime should be 5-7 minutes 6 on 6 unless penalties have occurred. Lets get back to the joy of having “unsung heroes” deciding games rather than the expected stars–it make everyone feel like they have had an opportunity to contribute and be recognized when they do so.

    Second, I am hoping that the Oilers are looking in the Swedish Elite League or the Finnish or Czech leagues for possible help @ centre. No rock should go unturned….this summer

  • paul wodehouse

    I actually like the shootout so I’m not convinced that they need to fix the game by having a 3 on 3 overtime. It feels just as gimmicky but without the skill that you could see in the shootout. I don’t know maybe 3 on 3 will be amazing but I know I never turned the channel when a shootout was coming up.