Is Jake Gardiner’s five-year extension a fair comparable for Justin Schultz?


On Tuesday, the Toronto Maple Leafs shifted course dramatically on defenceman Jake Gardiner, signing the former University of Wisconsin standout to a five-year contract with an annual cap hit of $4.05 million.

In Edmonton, meanwhile, Justin Schultz remains unsigned. Could he sign a contract comparable to the one his ex-Badgers teammate just inked?

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The Comparison

Jake Gardiner is a 6’2”, 184-pound puck-moving defenceman who turned 24 on July 4, and was originally selected by the Anaheim Ducks early in the 2008 Draft.

Justin Schultz is a 6’2”, 188-pound puck-moving defenceman who turned 24 on July 6, and was originally selected by the Anaheim Ducks early in the 2008 Draft.

So far, so good.

Gardiner averaged 18:10 at evens, 2:16 on the power play and 0:37 on the penalty kill for Toronto last season. Schultz posted 18:55 at evens, 3:26 on the power play and 0:58 on the penalty kill in Edmonton. Schultz got the bigger push, but the usage was similar. Schultz’s offence is better than Gardiner’s – there are lots of ways to express this, but 60 points in 122 games vs. 65 points in 167 games is good enough for our purposes.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

On the other hand, Gardiner’s Relative Corsi rating has consistently been good, and while he’s had a zonestart push he has outperformed it. In other words, Toronto has out-shot the opposition by more than we would expect with Gardiner on the ice if Gardiner were an average defenceman on the team. Schultz’s Relative Corsi rating has not been nearly as good, and while he hasn’t had the same zonestart push that Gardiner has, that doesn’t make up the difference. Even measured against a terrible Oilers’ blue, the team gets out-shot with Schultz on the ice by more than the average.

But even that’s hardly conclusive. Schultz has been welded to Andrew Ference and Nick Schultz for pretty much the entirety of his NHL career; Gardiner has had Cody Franson and Luke Schenn. I don’t think the world of Schenn, but do consider Franson to be the best player on that list of four by a considerable margin.

In short, these guys are close; if I had to commit to one and only one for the next five seasons I don’t know which I’d choose.

The Range


Tyler Dellow wrote about other comparables for Schultz a few weeks back, and noted six defencemen on long-term deals in the $4.0 million range:

With the exception of Hedman, who skews the list, most of these guys look to me like they were reasonably in the range of Schultz and Gardiner when they signed their long-term deals.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

I don’t think $20 million or so over five years is a bargain price for a player like Schultz, but I also don’t think it’s a contract that the Oilers are going to deeply regret. At that rate, if he’s a decent second-pairing guy the team will be okay; right now that takes a bit of projection on our part but I don’t think it’s an unreasonable expectation. From Schultz’s perspective, it’s not the Hall/Eberle/RNH deal, but it’s probably as much money as he can reasonably expect at term.


    • that’s a good point and i agree with you. i think i’d take all of the comparables before schultz but what skews the number is the time, salary cap goes up, salaries go up. i love toews and kane but are they worth 2M more than Sid, no but they signed this year. the gardiner comparison is probably the most accurate and does lay out what schultz is worth today and i think most fans would be fine at this price

  • vetinari

    I know that Schultz’s payday will be based on his comparables but I would take almost any of those other defencemen over Schultz. I have nothing against the guy and hope he sticks around for a while but he is not as developed or as rounded as some of the other guys listed and likely shouldn’t be paid for what he might turn into, at least not yet. My preference would be a 2/3 year bridge deal in the $3.5M/$3.75M range but if it was announced that he just signed for 5 years at $4M/per season, I wouldn’t be choked. Again, I just don’t want them to offer NTC or NMC’s in the deal so that if things go bust, you might be able to move him.

  • I think as much as I’m unsure about Schultz I’d do that same deal Gardiner got in a heartbeat. At worst it’s like average to slightly below average value for what he brings. At best, it’ll be like Hemsky’s first long deal he got that was fantastic value. So Ya, I’d take that small risk. It will be overpriced right now but should correct itself within a couple years at most.

    My only issue is more with fans. Oilers fans don’t see future when it comes to salary… They see now. So it will be tough to live up to.