Mark Arcobello re-signs with the Oilers

26-Arcobello-5

Well, how about that. On Monday, the Oilers passed on the (positive) news that Mark Arcobello, who had been bound for Group VI unrestricted free agency, had re-signed with the team. According to the Oilers’ official press release, Arcobello’s new deal is a one-year extension. 

What wasn’t included in the official release are the details of the contract beyond length. It’s almost certainly a one-way contract – Arcobello’s camp really had no incentive to sign a two-way deal with the Oilers. As for the money, I’d guess something in the six figure range; it isn’t likely that the team would shell out more than that for a player who was consigned to the minor leagues not all that long ago.  

With the small caveat that we can’t be totally sure until we here specifics of the contract, this comes across as very good news for Edmonton. We speculated just a few weeks ago that Arcobello might prefer to try and find his way with a team less focused on getting bigger, and that the end result might be that he was finished as an Oiler. The team should be happy that this turned out not to be the case, because while Arcobello’s still a bit of a question mark he looked a lot like an effective NHL player earlier this season and there’s no question Edmonton could use more of those.

Repercussions

89-Gagner-7

There are a few people who might plausibly be impacted by this signing.

Sam Gagner is at the top of the list. Arcobello got a prolonged shot at a skill job at centre thanks to Gagner’s injury early in the year, and he did a better job in a top-six role than Gagner has all season. More than that, Arcobello showed signs of being a positive possession player – something Gagner’s rarely done over his NHL career. Given that, Gagner’s current slot as second line centre is a plausible (if less than ideal) place to pencil in Arcobello for next season, and this signing isn’t going to do anything to cool the idea that Gagner’s going to be moved out of town over the summer. 

51-Lander-2

Anton Lander is another player potentially impacted by this signing. Lander’s been auditioning in the Mr. Versatility role that Arcobello eventually slid into prior to his demotion, and the results have been mixed. Some good things have happened with Lander on the ice, and by eye he’s been okay, but the offence stubbornly refuses to come even when he’s playing with scorers. The Oilers’ No. 4 and (assuming they use one) No. 5 centre roles for next season are wide open and even the staunchest supporter of the young Swede would admit he hasn’t forced himself into one of those spots. A pessimist might see Arcobello as the perfect 13th forward because he can do a bit of everything but isn’t proven enough to be put in a top-six job; if that’s the Oilers’ view it represents trouble for Lander.  

Bottom Line

Craig MacTavish2

Last summer, one of the things Craig MacTavish did to try and advance his team was bring in a group of players on cheap short-term deals to see if they had something to offer. Ryan Jones, Denis Grebeshkov and Anton Belov were all given one-year deals to show what they could do; they’ve all been various shades of disappointing but in each case the Oilers’ exposure to risk was limited. Jesse Joensuu, on a cheap two-year contract, falls under the same heading. 

The results haven’t been good, but it’s a process that makes a lot of sense for a team like Edmonton that has so much work to do. There’s some risk involved, but also the possibility that one of these cheap deals turns out a player who can further the cause.

This Arcobello extension falls into the same category, and it seems a reasonable bet for management to make. He isn’t a proven player, but he has overcome a lot already and didn’t look out of place in the Oilers’ top-six early in the year; there’s at least some possibility that he ends up dramatically out-performing the dollars he’s signed for. 

Or, as I put it when I was speculating that it might make sense for Arcobello to move on:

Good players sometimes get lost in bad teams, and Arcobello shows all the signs. He may or may not turn out, but he will be a nice cheap bet for some smart team out there.

RECENTLY BY JONATHAN WILLIS

  • 916oiler

    Guys, guys, seriously. I’m sorry. I was wrong. We need Arcobello on the team. With him on the team, we win more games and we’re a stronger team for it. Just think, if Mark Arcobello was on this team at the beginning of the year, we’d be in the playoff hunt right now.

    Wait, wasn’t he with the team for the first half of the season? Huh, I wonder how that went. Well, at least he won some faceoffs and bounced off some guys to show that he had heart, eh. Counts for something with some people, even if it meant absolutely nothing in the standings. I suppose there really are some who like to draft in the top 5 year after year, who knew?

  • 916oiler

    Having Arcobello on a one-year deal gives us options. He can play up and down in the lineup and plays with a chip on his shoulder. He’s far from the answer but having him around gives us some depth as we inevitably move guys out of town.

  • 916oiler

    Soo what Arco is 5.9 and 165 ibs? Sure size matters but it depends on how you use it. Jordin Tootoo is 5.9 and 194 ibs yet he plays like he is 6.5 220 ibs. A guy who finishes checks,can win faceoffs, play defense, and can get points. Sounds like something we have been trying to pursue

  • The key with this contract is that MacT has given himself some options at the centre position going forward. Arcobello is unlikely to slot into the 2C role except in emergencies. More likely that he will fill a bottom 6 role.

    The fact remains however that the Oilers need a 1C or 2C to match up with RNH. I sincerely hope that MacT is able to draft Reinhart, Draisaitl or Bennett to accomplish this. We need significant skill and some size down the middle.

    As for 1st pairing D Men, this is something that will have to be filled via trade or UFAs. While it would be nice to have an overwhelming stud D Man, what you really need is a set of six/seven competent D men playing at a level that is within their respective abilities. The problem we have had this year is that all our D men have been forced to line up at positions well above their level of capability. I would expect that Mac T realizes this and will take steps to try to correct it.

  • Sevenseven

    The offseason, as usual, looks like it will be so much more interesting than the actual season. At the very least, the top 6 is finally going to be broken up. As atrocious as this season has been, I look forward to seeing what MacT comes up with next year.