What should Peter Chiarelli do with Justin Schultz?


Justin Schultz is a restricted free agent. His last contract paid him $3.675 million on a one-year deal, and he probably isn’t worth the money but it’s awfully difficult to sign him for less now.

The Oilers’ new general manager, Peter Chiarelli, will need to decide how to proceed, and there aren’t any really easy answers.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The Options

Peter Chiarelli2

As always the “I’m not a lawyer” caveat applies here, but after looking through the relevant sections of the collective bargaining agreement I believe Chiarelli essentially has five options:

  • Negotiate a new contract prior to the qualifying offer deadline of June 25.
  • Trade Schultz to another team prior to the qualifying offer deadline of June 25.
  • Issue a qualifying offer of $3.675 million.
  • Take Schultz to club-elected arbitration in lieu of a qualifying offer.
  • Issue no qualifying offer and don’t take Schultz to arbitration, making him an unrestricted free agent.

Before making a decision, we need to get a good read on Schultz’s actual value. Schultz plays heavy minutes at even-strength and on the power play but has virtually no role on the penalty kill. How much value does he bring in those disciplines?

Schultz’s Value: Power Play


Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

It’s probably necessary to write a multi-piece series to fully evaluate where Schultz ranks among power play defencemen, so this is of necessity a bare bones description.

Schultz has some real strengths. His best attribute is probably his playmaking vision; he generally leads the Oilers’ zone entries and is adept at distributing the puck from the point position. He’s a good skater and has a good wrist shot. He’s a right shot, which matters. His greatest weakness is that he lacks a cannon from the point and as a rule last season teams didn’t worry too much about the point shot when they defended against the Oilers’ power play.

There are a lot of numbers I could dig into, but I’ll focus on one: points per hour. Using War on Ice, I created a list of every defenceman to play at least 150 minutes on the power play since 2012-13 and then ranked them by point production. Schultz has scored 3.75 points/hour over that span, a figure which ranks him No. 41 of 109 options. If we compare him strictly against first unit power play guys (for these purposes, players averaging 2.5 minutes/game or more) his comparables are as follow:

  • Slava Voynov: 3.84 points/hour (2.57 TOI/game)
  • John Klingberg: 3.83 points/hour (2.93 TOI/game)
  • Dion Phaneuf: 3.76 points/hour (3.34 TOI/game)
  • Justin Schultz: 3.75 points/hour (3.13 TOI/game)
  • Alex Goligoski: 3.71 points/hour (2.68 TOI/game)
  • Cam Fowler: 3.64 points/hour (2.78 TOI/game)
  • Oliver Ekman-Larsson: 3.62 points/hour (3.88 TOI/game)

Schultz is also in the range of players like Dan Boyle and Alex Pietrangelo (they rank slightly higher) and Lubomir Visnovsky and Drew Doughty (they rank slightly lower). It’s a good place to be. The Oilers’ power play has had some ups and downs during Schultz’s time in Edmonton but on balance this strikes me as a reasonable ranking. At No. 41 Schultz is a legitimate top power play option or an awesome second unit weapon.

Schultz’s Value: Even Strength


I’m going to lead with Schultz’s primary strength: offence. All the things that make him a good power play option apply to even-strength as well; there aren’t a lot of defencemen you’d rather see trailing the attacking forwards on an odd-man rush. Among the 192 defencemen who have played 1,500 even-strength minutes since 2012-13, Schultz ranks No. 56 in terms of points/hour (0.82, in the same range as Paul Martin and Brent Seabrook).

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

That ability also helps him in the defensive zone. Schultz had a nasty campaign in 2014-15 in terms of taking/making a pass, regressing significantly in those areas, but over the bulk of his NHL career he’s been adept at moving pucks out of his own end of the rink and that has significant value.

He also has major warts. At 6’2”, 196 pounds he has average size but regrettably doesn’t play a remotely physical game; he has a good stick but if the pokecheck doesn’t work he’s next to useless at taking the puck away from an opponent (he’s so infamous for this that Twitter’s Cameron Thomson coined the phrase “to jultz”, meaning to reach awkwardly for the puck with one hand on the stick; the term caught on quickly in Oil Country). He cheats for offence, often getting caught up ice, and his defensive positioning isn’t great even when he’s back. I lost track of the number of times he failed to take the cross-ice lane away on a two-on-one; at some point one would assume he’d figure it out just based on repetition.


Shift length is an issue, too. Schultz averaged 27.0 shifts per game and played 22:36 per night; for the sake of contrast Mark Fayne averaged 26.6 shifts per game and just 17:56 per night. Some of that relates to usage (power play vs. penalty kill) but Schultz just doesn’t seem good at taking advantage of opportunities to get off the ice.

Numbers-wise, Schultz doesn’t come across well. I did an in-depth comparison to Jeff Petry last season; this year I’ll do the same thing but this time to Mark Fayne. Statstics used here come from the marvelous hockeyanalysis.com

Firstly, it’s important to realize that Schultz has a massive advantage in terms of the teammates he plays with. Schultz spent 42.6 percent of his ice-time this year with the quintet of Jordan Eberle, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Taylor Hall, Benoit Pouliot and David Perron. Fayne spent just 35.5 percent of his time with that group. They spent a comparable amount of time with middle-tier forwards, with Schultz having a slight edge there. The difference was made up with fourth-line/fringe NHL types. Schultz spent just 23.7 percent of his ice-time with Boyd Gordon, Matt Hendricks and the AHL crew; Fayne spent fully 33.4 percent of his time with that group.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Schultz spent a lot of time with good players and Fayne didn’t. Fayne also faced top-pairing opponents while Schultz came in sixth among regular Oilers defencemen, ahead of only Keith Aulie. Given quality of competition/teamamtes effects, if Schultz and Fayne were identical players we’d expect Schultz to out-perform Fayne by a wide margin when paired with the same partner. What actually happened?

4.28.15 Schultz v Fayne

  • Both Nikita Nikitin and Andrew Ference were much better with Fayne than Schultz, despite starting far more frequently in the defensive zone with Fayne.
  • Oscar Klefbom, Martin Marincin and Keith Aulie all posted better Corsi numbers with Schultz, but under far less trying circumstances. Ignoring the big advantages in quality of opposition and teammates that Schultz enjoyed, that trio averaged an 8.8 percent Corsi bump but also a 20.2 percent zonestart bump.
  • Digression: I’ve never understood why Marincin/Schultz hasn’t been tried for any length of time in the NHL. They were a very good AHL pair in 2012-13 and they’ve been great in cameos together in the majors.

There’s some room for interpretation in those numbers, but as I read them Fayne looks like a much better defenceman than Schultz. Despite playing with less capable forwards, against better opponents and getting buried with shift after shift starting in the defensive zone, Fayne had better results than Schultz with two of five partners.

Mileage is going to vary, but at this point I have difficulty concluding that Schultz is any better than a No. 4 option at even-strength, and frankly I’m skeptical he’s even that. Ideally, I think he’s a third-pairing offensive specialist at evens and a top-unit power play defenceman.

Schultz’s Value & the Oilers’ Options

So, what do the Oilers do?

Schultz isn’t worth $3.675 million, so issuing a qualifying offer would be a non-starter for me. Arbitration is a better answer but still isn’t great because the arbiter can’t knock his contract value down more than 15 percent ($3.124 million), and arbitration not only tends to open up rifts between players and teams but also won’t necessarily result in a salary deduction.

Signing Schultz to a contract prior to arbitration stinks, too, because he knows he’s not getting less than that $3.124 million number and his agents still doubtless dream of a big year on the power play and big dollars in the future.

Walking away is difficult because Schultz is a young player with some upside and a bad defence won’t be made better by losing assets for nothing.

The best option for the team, in my view, is to trade the player. The return won’t necessarily be great, but it can probably help. Options might include a player like Dustin Byfuglien (a year away from free agency with a $5.2 million cap hit and a turbulent history in Winnipeg) or Dion Phaneuf (a good defenceman who has a tough $7.0 million cap hit until 2021). Ideally the Oilers would have moved Schultz last year, but it’s too late to worry about that now.

Peter Chiarelli should aggressively shop the player. Failing a trade, all he has are options so bad that just walking away might legitimately be the best of them.


  • hagar

    We are talking 8 freaking million dollars in cap space between shultz and nikitin!! 8 million!!

    8 million dollars a year gets you a dman that will be on the ice almost half of the game!!

    I say screw him.. the time of ineptitude is over.

  • I Remember the Orange Jerseys

    Personally, I don’t think Schultz will ever be worth more than $2.5M a year, but here’s hoping he proves me wrong.

    If Schultz is still an Oiler come September, my hope is that Chiarelli has worked enough magic that he’s no higher than number 5/6 on the depth chart, and second power play unit.

    • hagar

      Or that the entire team feeds off the new changes, and turns things up a notch. That is my big hope.

      That goes for everyone that seems to shut down randomly from game to game. I am picturing a glorious revival of everyone’s skills.

      Call it a hunch, but now that this tumor has been lanced, and the players are now accountable for their actions, things will change team wide.

  • Gretzkin

    I often wonder why they don’t make players like Jultz wingers.
    He’d make a near lethal 3rd line sniper and could still play the point on the 1st or 2nd PP Unit.
    That deployment would do wonders to his value.
    I could be wrong.

  • PEBOisONit

    Letting him walk isnt an option so sure try and trade him. The problem is he plays the right side so if we lose him we’re really getting short on that side. We absolutely need several d-men to fix our blueline and it might be tough to get many this summer.

    The back up option is keep him for a year, let him get some easy points passing the puck up to McDavid and trade him at the deadline.

  • AJ88

    Many teams were interested in JS before he came to the Oilers, he lit it up in the AHL, he has struggled in the NHL to date under a team that has been dysfunctional to say the least.

    With new management and a new direction I say qualify him and see if he turns things around. I don’t think there is any question he is a much better player than most on ON agree on. You are not going to get much for him via trade at this time anyways.

    • BigMcD

      He should not be the number one go to guy. Get someone else on this team and let him follow and learn the game , be it from a top rank dman or a coach that knows how to work with a guy of his talents.

  • Darth Oiler

    If I remember my CBA correctly a team can walk away from the decision of the arbitrator and let him be a UFA then? So would arbitration not buy the team time to explore other options?

  • Johnnydapunk

    Jultz should not have to play 23 minutes a night. He is a 4 or 5 on a team with depth. (Much like Petry, Smid and Gilbert before him.) I’d offer a two year deal at 3.5 million.

    Try to push him down the line up, through free agent signings, and the trade market.( LA, Boston, and San Jose will be retooling, all are near the cap. )

  • 15w40

    Oilers are backed into a corner, overpaid on the last deal and due to the CBA are stuck.

    Sounds like no matter what happens with the arbitration, it will still be an overpay for what he is providing plus there is a huge amount of negativity just inherent to the process.

    Two options really IMHO. 1 year qualifying offer at the lowest amount possible and play him where he belongs in the line up (3rd pairing and PP) or trade him for the best return you can get.

    It makes zero sense to walk away for nothing even if the trade is for a 2nd round pick. If its for Byfuglien then you get that document into the NHL offices for sign off when they open tomorrow morning.

  • vetinari

    My take would be to offer him a Yakupov style bridge deal: 2 years at $2.5M/season. Give him until May 31st. If he rejects it, you shop the hell out of him or package him up for something bigger. If still no takers or reasonable offers, go to arbitration and knock him down if you can. Don’t care about burning goodwill as he will either straighten up, improve his gameplay and earn a better contract next time, or flameout and you walk away in a year. I

  • Randaman

    Watching the Soo vs Erie game, one thing is clear. Nurse is the only reason it was 7-5 not 12-5. The second I turned on the TV Mcdavid got an assist. Can’t wait to watch both nest season

  • O.C.

    Stop the Insanity!

    His 3.6 M contract is too rich so the solution is maybe trade for a guy that’s average and grossly overpaid for many, many years?

    If we pretended he was getting 2.6 million and someone else was overpaid by a million, that’s WAY better than screwing your cap for years with a D man that’s (allegedly) overpaid 2 to 2.5 million a year.

  • Serious Gord

    If you want to keep him, you have to be able to make him stronger. He loses every net-front battle. He has to, at least, achieve average NHL strength. I imagine that would help with his shot power too…

  • hagar

    Zarny, I don’t necessarily agree with you. Sure he had 31 points, but he was still -17! For that kind of money, wouldn’t you hope for a guy who could have positive numbers?

  • Bloodsweatandoil

    Jeeze…..Well in my opinion, if we didn’t win that first pick this year and having all hell break loose…..After MacT claimed next year would be another developmental year, I would have been curious to see him play as a winger lol..

    The guy did put up points for, but the points he caused against tips the scales….if somebody is better or more accountable, then turf him! How much more time does he need to prove his worthiness?

  • Oilcounty88

    I don’t believe that trading this player for a bad contract is a good idea. I’d compare Schultz to Mike Green in Washington who for years people talked about what a terrible defenceman he was because he was forced to play big minutes against top lines. Washington brought in Orpik/Niskanen to handle the tough minutes and allowed Green to take more offensive starts and power play time. Green has had his best season in years because of this. We need to start using players in positions where they can succeed instead of throwing them to the wolves. Part of being a good GM is signing players to good contracts and this is a big test off the hop for the new GM.

  • Sheldon "Oilers Fan for Life!!!"

    Sign the kid for 5 years at 3 million per. There is a player there but he is not a first line D-man. Over time 3 mil per will be wonderful if the cap stays strong. I would like to offer 2 Mil per but we have that issue of a contract at present.

  • Johnnydapunk

    My goodness a trade for Byfuglien would be a trade of champions! His hitting alone would make players think twice before coming near any of the Oil scorers.

    I still remember his hit on Gazdic (not sure if Gazdic remembers it) and it was clean and stupidly hard, the Oil need more of that, soooo much more of that.

  • Paq Twinn

    Pairing Schultz at reasonable number with vet on 3rd pairing, good. Pairing a 3.5 million dollar Schultz with anyone on 3rd pairing, BAD. JW summed it up best, “His salary exceeds his abilities”. It doesn’t matter who is paired with him, Schultz cannot handle the work load of a 3.5 million dollar defenceman. Trade or walk, after all we paid only dollars to aquire him in the first place.

  • S cottV

    Buyout or Bury Nikitin and Ference. Then go all out for 2 x 2nd pairing D men. (Sekera/Martin come to mind. pair up Klefbom and Fayne with Sekera and Martin. And then play Schultz with Marincin on the 3rd pairing. Cut Schultz’s min’s back to avg 3rd pairing min’s with primo PP time. PUMP AND DUMP after that. Because we got Nurse all seasoned up in the AHL by then.

  • Anton CP

    I still think that Oilers can sign Schultz to one year qualifying offer. It will not hurt the cap room for one year, trading away Schultz will not get any return whatsoever at his current value. If he can be able to perform better than this year with new coach and new teammates or even a new position then his trade value will go up.