110
Photo Credit: Christopher Hanewinckel-USA TODAY Sports

NHL: Too many missed calls

Despite a call for crackdowns on obstruction, holding and hand slashing, NHL teams in 2017/2018 still have the fifth lowest PP/game average over the past 54 seasons. Despite more speed among the elite players of the game, they are managing to get fewer powerplays than ever before.

I love hockey — always have — but over the past few seasons, I find myself watching fewer games than I used to. I get frustrated by the amount of missed calls, and I find the games are less exciting than before. I was ecstatic when the new TV deal came out a few years ago, knowing we’d see more than just the Toronto Maple Leafs or Montreal Canadiens on Saturday nights. More channels meant more options and more opportunity to see the stars of the game.

However, after watching more games involving the best players, I’ve sadly realized the NHL is the only league that seems hell bent on punishing their best players. They want them to fight through infractions rather than enforce the rulebook. I don’t need an endless parade of penalties, but if the NHL would actually crack down on infractions, the players would adjust. And if they had to stop hooking or holding it would allow the incredible speed of today’s players to shine through more often.

Why wouldn’t the NHL want their most skilled players to be able to show off their incredible skill more often?

Advertisement

Since 1963/1964, only during five seasons have NHL teams averaged 3.2 penalties/game or less.

This year it is 3.2
In 1977/1978 it was 3.19.
In 2015/2016 teams averaged 3.11.
In 2014/2015 it was 3.06
And last season was the lowest ever, with teams averaging 2.99 powerplays/game.

So in the past 54 NHL seasons, four of the five lowest PP/game averages have occurred in the last FOUR NHL seasons.

I’d say it is a trend in the wrong direction.

And it’s down by a significant margin.

From 1980 to 2008, the average PP/game for a team was between 4.00 to 5.85 pp/games. The highest was in 2005/2006, when teams averaged 5.85 PP/game, but as recent as 2008 teams were at 4.16, which is basically one more PP game than what teams average now.

Don’t be fooled into believing players are that much more disciplined today. They aren’t, but they get away with much more holding, slashing and obstruction. During the 1990s when Mario Lemieux accurately complained about all the obstruction, teams still had way more powerplays than we see today.

From 1990 to 1999, the yearly average for powerplays/game for a team was 4.58, 4.57, 5.02, 5.28, 4.85, 4.36, 5.04, 4.10, 4.64 and 4.38.
From 2010 until this season, teams have averaged 3.71, 3.54, 3.31, 3.32, 3.27, 3.06, 3.11, 2.99 and 3.20 power plays per game.

Why the drastic decrease in penalties?

WHY FEWER CALLS?

I spoke with former NHL referee Kerry Fraser about the drop in penalties.

He turned the table and asked me, “Where do you see the potential infraction not being called most often?

I replied, “When a player has the puck with speed either though the neutral zone or entering the offensive zone. I see the most missed calls in those areas.”

Fraser then explained why. And he did it in great detail.

“I absolutely agree with you, and I’ll tell you why, because that’s where the play transitions. The transition through the neutral zone is really quick in the game now and that’s where the officials get caught flat footed. They start to back up from their positions, some of them retreat so far back they’re making long distance calls or they can’t support the puck when the play is down on the far end, and you watch, you’ll see guys standing back, red line or even beyond the red line towards the blue line when the play is deep in the other end. Those are the guys who are a little nervous about a quick transition and are not able to move backwards quick enough,” explained Fraser.

“You (refs) should be able to get out quick. When you read the play, when you see that there is a Connor McDavid starting to spring and he’s moving in open ice and he’s going to be a potential outlet once that Oilers guy regains possession of the puck, it’s at that moment that you read the play, you backup. you start, you always stay ahead of a McDavid or anybody and you’ve got to get moving your feet.

“Some guys don’t see that. They’re puck watchers, all of the sudden they get surprised. ‘Oh my God, the puck’s passed, McDavid has it’. Now you’re playing catch-up as a referee.

“So those elements of seeing the play in advance, reading it, knowing the outlet, when the guy gets the puck, what are all of the outlets, and you do that by setting up freeze frame pictures. You might have to have a [Milan] Lucic on the one side, he might be just inside the blueline. You might have the centremen, McDavid, up high and the other winger is down low supporting the puck. So you’ve got to know when the puck is obtained, where the defensive players are and where the best outlets are as a referee.

“You’ve got to move, you’ve got to see it, you’ve got to angle yourself in such a position that you’re going to have the best view because when that puck is passed to a guy like McDavid, he skates as fast, if not faster with the puck than without it. And you’ve got to be prepared to move and get an angle because refs have a short window, just like defensive players have a short window to try to catch the fast players like McDavid, Jack Eichel, Nikita Kucherov and the other fast stars. And how often that happens quickly, it’s going to happen almost as quickly as he gets the puck, because that’s usually the closest proximity to the defending player will have. Because once they light it up, look out,” said Fraser.

So the speed of the game is making it more difficult for officials to get in position to make the call. It makes sense, but there are two referees on the ice now compared to the one-man system we used to see and one referee would call more infractions that two do now. That doesn’t make much sense to me.

POSITIONING & THINKING

Oct 4, 2017; Edmonton, Alberta, CAN; Edmonton Oilers forward Connor McDavid (97) celebrates his third period goal against the Calgary Flames at Rogers Place. Mandatory Credit: Perry Nelson-USA TODAY Sports

Many fans around the NHL get frustrated when their best player is impeded or obstructed and there is no call.

Fraser explained what he sees specifically about McDavid, but also said this happens to other stars around the league who carry the puck a lot.

“There are situations with McDavid, based on his speed, the ability to really ignite it, to have the puck a lot, that I believe should be called more. He’s so quick and I think that he’s almost, I hate to say this, he’s almost too quick for the officials. You’ve got to move and get into a position ahead of him to really see the contact, the restraint and when officials get caught a little slow, a little flat footed backing up as this guy ignites and explodes, all of the sudden the referee’s focus, I believe is, ‘Oh my gosh, I’ve got to get moving,'” said Fraser.

“Then they drop their eyes, which you should never do anyways, you should be able to skate backwards without looking down at your feet. But there’s that pause, that pregnant pause that ‘Uh oh, I gotta go,’ and ‘I’m going to get caught,’ and then they start getting out of the way and that’s when things can be missed. You’ve got to set yourself up in advance. You and I have talked before about seeing the game in advance. You talk about Wayne Gretzky, nobody saw it better than him, incredible vision, knew where the puck was going to be two, three, four chess moves down the board.

“And that’s what the officials have to develop. They (NHL) have a lot of young officials, some have just finished playing and the league is on this let’s recruit former players — American League, East Coast League, kind of guys that know the game, or should. That’s terrific, I endorse that, but they’ve got to be taught how to referee. Because when you drop your stick as a player and you put on a whistle on your hand, you’ve got to totally adjust your philosophy. Players attack the puck, but officials have to retreat from the puck and that’s where that vision of understanding the game for sure as a former player will need to change. They have to transition into the referee mindset. Which is totally reverse from attacking the puck,” explained Fraser.

NEEDS TO CHANGE

I’m really perplexed why the NHL is so stubborn in enforcing the rule book. It’s mind boggling.

They will bring in needless rules like offside review and eliminate goals because a skate is off the ice, even though the player is not across the blueline and has no actual advantage, but refuse to crack down on officials for missed calls.

The game is faster than ever, but it isn’t as exciting as it used to be. The NHL needs to address this now.

Just call the game by the wording of the rule book. Empower your officials to call the enforce the rules and ensure they are in the best position to see the play.

Recently by Jason Gregor:

  • Rama Lama

    Just how many times do we have to watch this silly movie……..you know the one I’m talking about!

    Rule changes and new yearfor the first 40 games will see officiating done a certain way. The balance of the 40 games will see officiating done a totally different way. Playoffs will see officiating done completely differently…….the whistles get put away.

    As far as the NHL making the game more interesting………that is what I call cognitive dissonance. They want it, but cant seem to figure out how to do it so they make rule changes…….instead of replacing referees or re-training them!

  • KMA

    Well here’s another missed call, when pistol Pete signed Lucic to a $6M x 6Yr. contract and no one on the old boys management team had the balls to call him out on the gross stupidity of the deal before it was signed.

    • Odanada

      If Wayne stays quiet then no one else will question it.
      I revere Wayne as a player, but his presence in Oiler management is worrisome. People will simply not disagree with him on hockey matters and time has proven that although he was a beast as a player, his record as coach/management is not ipressive.

    • McDavid's Comet

      @ KMA

      Or… the old boys agreed with Pistol Pete and thought it was a great deal, which explains why we endured a D.O.D. and may very well be descending into another one (I pray to god we are not). I cannot fathom how these a$$-clowns are STILL employed by the Oilers organization, I guess it’s #becauseOilers. I just don’t get it.

  • BingBong

    Great article, along with some great posts.
    Bottom line for me: I think the league values parity over everything. Keep the games close, keep the standings tight, make more money.
    The extra OT point, the vague rules, forcing the best players to play through obvious penalties. This all adds up to parity. It’s ruining the NHL.

  • Lowe But Now High Expectations

    I’ve been saying for a while today’s hockey is awful. Too over coached, boring systems. I’ve watched hockey for about 40 years and my conclusion is when the game had more fighting there was more scoring. Individual battles (like Messier vs Otto) don’t exist anymore. And of course, goalies are way better today with technique and equipment. The game is too much like the owners running it, corporate, stuffy and boring.

  • RJ

    I enjoyed Fraser’s comments. I had a friend who was an NCAA referee. Reffed in the Frozen Four, international competitions etc.

    He was asked to be an NHL referee, but he declined. The NHL was extremely restrictive in their expectations, and the pay was not much better. It was more of a “hey we are the NHL”. A lot of seasoned referees turned them down.

    And now you’re stuck with Young former players who never paid their dues at the lower level. They just wanted to be in the NHL.

    • Bert Raccoon

      Good point but it takes time. Reffing is reactive to the game/players and refs are often a bit older. The wave of speedy skating we see in this generation will take a while before they become speedy refs. I personally vote for Nurse, after a long successful career as a player, to be a ref. Skates backwards faster than some NHL’ers do forwards and is gaining experience on where “the line” is for penalties.

  • OilCan2

    Interesting point of view by K Frazer. Notwithstanding the face offs could easily be called but are not. I see lots of blades on the red hash marks and the whistle is nowhere to be heard. Its cheating because its against the rules.

    The offside BS has to stop to get me back watching. The play is alive so its pointless to go back and change your mind. If the linesman call the play on the blueline they are right 98% of the time.

    Take video review to the rescue of the refs. Allow the coaches to review for holding, slashing etc. at the first stoppage.

    Let’s make NHL hockey great again!

    • IRONman

      Let’s do it like 1999. No player in the blue paint but goalie. Brock B scores lots of goals before the hash marks. Let’s see 1980s way. And Oil please go .500, coz Dahlin can wear no 8.

  • Klarn

    You would think since the 2 ref system was brought in 2000/1, there would naturally be more calls then less? That is why I tend to believe they are just calling game different.

  • JitanPren

    It’s all in service of parity. The longer a team stays in the race the better attendance is and more revenue is generated. Officiating and the awarding of the loser point are the only means the league has to steer their product towards this outcome. By lowering the pp /game numbers to near all time low they can effect offense by eliminating the high danger scoring chances by teams best players that a power play awards thus inhibiting teams ability to pull too far ahead in the playoff races and destroy the desired parity. Big business leaves as little to chance as possible.

  • heyrayray

    Let’s be real here, the nhl is no different than WWE. Refs either call it how they want or how they are instructed. They want the oilers to lose and they try their best to make sure that happens on a regular enough basis so that they don’t make the playoffs, and the oilers are not the only team that it happens to.

      • Bert Raccoon

        Mr. Gregor, I agree with your point and the majority of this fine article. I wonder how much of the penalties-per-game statistic is related to the decline of fighting or the pugilistique type player in our present day iteration of the game? This may make your point further but, might there be a trend towards more stick infractions while players manage their game to avoid the possible “head as initial point of contact” suspension?

    • Bert Raccoon

      Seems like a strange thing to do. Wouldn’t if be good for the league to have McDavid, if no one else, in the playoffs. Seems like that would be good for the brand. What are you seeing with the other teams that are getting shafted by the refs? Curious about which teams.